韓國開發硏究제 33 권제 1 호 ( 통권제 110 호 ) 소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 이한규 ( 한국개발연구원부연구위원 ) Terms of Trade Shocks and Nontradable Goods Price Inflation Targeting Unde

Similar documents
Vol.32 No.3 / ISSN x 韓國開發硏究 KDI Journal of Economic Policy 2011 Terms of Trade Shocks and Nontradable Goods Price Inflation Targeting Under a

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 학술 전력시장가격에대한역사적요인분해 * 35

부문별 에너지원 수요의 변동특성 및 공통변동에 미치는 거시적 요인들의 영향력 분석

1차1~6장12.9

164

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

KDI정책포럼제221호 ( ) ( ) 내용문의 : 이재준 ( ) 구독문의 : 발간자료담당자 ( ) 본정책포럼의내용은 KDI 홈페이지를 통해서도보실수있습니다. 우리나라경

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 1~18 가격비대칭성검정모형민감도분석 1

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 18, Number 1, March 2019 : pp 에너지전환정책및고령화가국민경제에미치는영향 : 확률적중첩세대일반균형모형 (Stochastic Overlapping Genera

Microsoft PowerPoint - Freebairn, John_ppt

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 1~29 정책 용도별특성을고려한도시가스수요함수의 추정 :, ARDL,,, C4, Q4-1 -

<C7A5C1F620BEE7BDC4>

2

11¹ÚÇý·É

, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

서론 34 2

02김헌수(51-72.hwp


Vol.258 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

공휴일 전력 수요에 관한 산업별 분석

06_À̼º»ó_0929

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호


歯표지_최종H_.PDF

44-4대지.07이영희532~

歯4차학술대회원고(장지연).PDF


에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

Buy one get one with discount promotional strategy


에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 57~83 발전용유연탄가격과여타상품가격의 동조화현상에대한실증분석 57

<C3D6C1BEBFCFBCBA2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D31C8A3292E687770>

, ( ) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). *

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<C3D6C1BE2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D32C8A3292E687770>


에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 85~114 산업별에너지원간대체관계추정을통한탄소세의 CO 2 감축효과분석 * 85

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

<4B C0CEBBE7C0CCC6AE D323720C0CEBCE22E687770>

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 1~26 실물옵션을이용한해상풍력실증단지 사업의경제성평가 1

歯1.PDF

264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부


Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

노동경제논집 38권 4호 (전체).hwp

......(N)

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


한국 출산력의 저하 요인에 관한 연구

¨ë Áö¸®ÇÐȸÁö-¼Û°æ¾ðOK

hwp

#Ȳ¿ë¼®


Microsoft Word - NEW08_prof. Ma

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

- 1 -

<C6EDC1FD2DBAB8B0EDBCAD BCF6C1A4292D DBABBB9AE2E687770>

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

09김정식.PDF

<C7D1B1B9B0E6C1A6BFACB1B8C7D0C8B828C0CCC1BEBFF85FC0CCBBF3B5B75FBDC5B1E2B9E9292E687770>

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

요 약 대한민국은 1948년 정부수립 이후 60년 만에 세계 13위의 경제대국으로 비약적인 성 장을 이루었다. 정부수립 2년 만에 북한의 전격 남침으로 전 국토가 초토화되었고, 휴 전 이후에도 안보에 대한 위협은 계속되었다. 그러나 대한민국 국민은 불리한 여건에 좌절하


1. 목차_kkh hwp

조사연구 권 호 연구논문 한국노동패널조사자료의분석을위한패널가중치산출및사용방안사례연구 A Case Study on Construction and Use of Longitudinal Weights for Korea Labor Income Panel Survey 2)3) a

< BBF3B9DDB1E228C6EDC1FD292E687770>

기타자료.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 95~118 학술 탄소은행제의가정용전력수요절감효과 분석 1) 2) 3) * ** *** 95

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

<C0C7B7CAC0C720BBE7C8B8C0FB20B1E2B4C9B0FA20BAAFC8AD5FC0CCC7F6BCDB2E687770>

지능정보연구제 16 권제 1 호 2010 년 3 월 (pp.71~92),.,.,., Support Vector Machines,,., KOSPI200.,. * 지능정보연구제 16 권제 1 호 2010 년 3 월


02신현화


歯Product1.PDF

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

韓國開發硏究제 33 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 112 호 ) 재직자직업훈련관련공적재정의구조와성과 : 효과분석 이철인 ( 서울대학교사회과학대학경제학부교수 ) 유경준 ( 한국개발연구원선임연구위원 ) Training Incentives in the Korean Levy-Gran

歯목차.PDF

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

도비라

???? 1

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE. vol. 29, no. 10, Oct ,,. 0.5 %.., cm mm FR4 (ε r =4.4)

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

,......


BSC Discussion 1

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


Transcription:

韓國開發硏究제 33 권제 1 호 ( 통권제 110 호 ) 소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 이한규 ( 한국개발연구원부연구위원 ) Terms of Trade Shocks and Nontradable Goods Price Inflation Targeting Under a Small Open Economy Lee, Hangyu (Associate Research Fellow, Korea Development Institute) * 본논문은기발간된 소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 ( 정책연구시리즈 2009-16, 한국개발연구원, 2009) 을보완및수정한것임을밝힌다. ** 이한규 : (e-mail) hglee@kdi.re.kr, (address) Korea Development Institute, 49 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea Key Word: (Small Open Economy), (Terms of Trade Shocks), JEL Code: F41, E52 (Nontradable Goods), (Monetary Policy) Received: 2010. 8. 4 Referee Process Started: 2010. 8. 13 Referee Reports Completed: 2011. 3. 16

ABSTRACT Terms of trade shocks have been considered one of the main driving forces causing business cycle fluctuations in small open economies. Despite their importance in business cycles of small open economies, it is hard to find a serious study in existing literature investigating their implications on monetary policy under a small open economy. Considering it, this paper studies what form of monetary policy rule is the most adequate for a small open economy where terms of trade shocks are dominant factors in generating its business cycle fluctuations. For this purpose, various implementable monetary policy rules frequently analyzed in existing literature are compared in terms of social welfare levels which they can provide for the economy respectively. Main results of this paper can be summarized as follows. First, for a small open economy where terms of trade shocks are main driving forces of its business cycle fluctuations, the nontradable goods price inflation targeting can provide higher level of social welfare than other traditional monetary policy rules such as the CPI inflation targeting or the fixed exchange rate regime. Second, the social welfare improvement of the non-tradable goods price inflation targeting is more apparent when export goods price shocks are more important than import goods price shocks.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 3 Ⅰ. 서론, (price-taker).,.., Mendoza(1995) Kose(2002). 1), Mendoza (1995) (real business cycle theory) (quantitative), 50%,, Kose(2002) 90%,., (New Keynesian),. Galí and Monacelli(2005) 1), Neumeyer and Perri(2004), Lubik and Teo(2005).

4 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ. 2),.,,.., (nontradable goods). (tradable goods),.., (quantitatively).,,.,, Galí and Monacelli(2005),. 2) DSGE(Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium), Faia and Monacelli(2008), De Paoli(2009) (2008).

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 5,,.,.,.,,.. 3), 2.. 4).,. (solution) (approximation).,.,. 3) Rotemberg and Woodford(1999) Galí(2008). 4).

6 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ Ⅱ. 이론모형 1. 이론모형의주요특징,,.,.,,. Galí and Monacelli(2005),.,,.,..,, (observational equivalence),.,. 5),, 5) KDI.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 7., (dynamics),,. 6) (Domestic Inflation Targeting),.,.., Calvo(1983),, (incomplete asset market)., (uncontingent bond).,. 7) 2. 이론모형의구성가. 가계부문, (notations). s t t (state), s t t (history of states) s t ={s 0, s 1,,s t}., π(s t ).. 6) (open macroeconomics) Stockman and Tesar(1995) Burstein et al.(2005). 7) (sector-specific),. Woodford(2003).

8 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ,.,., (uncontingent). 8). (K(s t-1 )) (C(s t )), (N(s t )), (I(s t )) (B F (s t )) (life-time utility). max β, γ γ n.,., 9). P(s t ) S(s t ), W(s t ) Z(s t ). Q * (s t ) 1, (1+i * (s t )) Q * (s t )=1/(1+i * (s t )) 8), (incomplete asset market), Schmitt- Grohé and Uribe(2002) Letendre(2000), (unique steady state). (approximation) (numerical method),, Schmitt-Grohé and Uribe(2002),. 9),.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 9., Π(s t ), δ, η K..,. q K (s t ) Tobin q,, q K (s t ){1+η K (I(s t )/K(s t-1 )-δ)}., T N, T N. Y(s t ), Y T(s t ) Y N(s t ) T N. T, N, T N T N. T N (P(s t )), P T (s t ) P N (s t ) T N., χ T N, b T N.

10 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ 나. 최종재 N 생산부문 N, (differentiated goods), i [0,1]. N. ε N N, P N(i:s t )(i [0,1]), N., Y N (i:s t )(i[0,1]) N P N(s t ). Γ(s t,s t+τ ) (stochastic discounting factor),. 11) for 10), Calvo(1983)., N. 1-φ N, Calvo. 10) N i, t,. t φ N,. max

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 11 [Figure 1] Structure of Theoretical Model Final Consumption & Investment Final Good : Final Good : Intermediate Good Domestic Intermediate Good Domestic Intermediate Good Capital Labor Capital Labor Perfectly Competitive Market 11),.

12 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ P I N(i,j:s t+τ ) Y I N(i,j:s t+τ ) i j., i, i, i. θ i j. i (optimal reset price) P # N(i:s t ) i j. for P I N(i:s t+τ ) i,. 다. 최종재 T 생산부문 T N, l[0,1]. T.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 13 T P T (l:s t )(l[0,1]), T, Y T(l:s t )(l[0,1]) T P T (s t ). for, T N., φ T T. max P H * (s t ) P F * (s t ),., l, l, l. T. Y H (l:s t ) Y F (l:s t ) l, ρ, a. l P T # (l:s t ) l.

14 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ 생산부문 라. 최종재 N 을위한중간재 N, N. N. N j., j,. max j, A N (s t ), N N (j:s t ), K N (j:s t ) N j. φ NM j, α.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 15 j, N i[0,1],. j. MC n N(s t ), N. 12) 마. 최종재 T 를위한중간재생산부문 T, 12) N (),,.

16 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ.,, (price-taker),,, A T (s t ) T.. 13), T N,., P * H (s t ),, S(s t )P * H (s t ).. T,, Y H(s t ) Y * H (s t ), N T (s t ) K T (s t ). 3. 모형의균형, 실행가능한통화정책및사회후생 가. 모형의균형 2 max., 13).

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 17 (implementable), (metric).,..,,.,, (uncovered interest rate parity)., 1+i(s t ) 1+i * (s t ). 14),,,. 나. 실행가능한통화정책, Ramsey,,,. Ramsey,,. 14),.

18 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ Galí and Monacelli(2005) (CPI Inflation Targeting: CIT), (Domestic Inflation Targeting: DIT), (Exchange Rate Peg).,,.,. (P D (s t )) (ω).,.,,, 1. 15). 다. 사회후생및모형의 2 차근사, Galí and Monacelli(2005).., (metric). Schmitt-Grohé and Uribe(2007) (life-time utility),. 15) Galí and Monacelli(2005) (interest rate smoothing).

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 19 s 0, W C (s 0 ) (conditional welfare). 16) (unconditioinal welfare),., Kim and Kim(2003), 1 (first-order linear approximation). Schmitt- Grohé and Uribe(2004) 2 (second-order approximation). 17), 2,. (optimal reset price) 2., N (infinite sum), 2. 16), s 0 (non-stochastic steady state). 17), 1, 2 (second moment), 2 LQ(linear-quadratic). Woodford(2003).

20 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ, (recursive), 2, 2. 2. Ⅲ. 주요통화정책의사회후생비교 1. 모수의설정., (parameter),.,.,,,

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 21.,,. Stockman and Tesar(1995) 0.44, T Chari et al.(2002) 1.5., T 6, (markup rate) 20%. N 10, 10%.,,. (reference),.,, 40~ 60%. 18),,., 60%., T N b T a GDP GDP 60% 30%.,, 18) Burstein et al.(2005, 2007), Mendoza and Uribe(2000) Goldberg and Campa(2006).

22 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ <Table 1> Benchmark Parameters Preference intertemporal elasticity of consumption2 2 elasticity of labor supply1 1 Technology labor share2/3 2/3 Aggregator depreciation rate0.021 0.021 elasticity of substitution between domestic and imported intermediate goods for tradable goods1.5 0.33 elasticity of substitution among intermediate goods for nontradable goods10 0.9 elasticity of substitution between final goods N and T0.44-1.27 elasticity of substitution among differentiated final goods T6 0.83 elasticity of substitution among differentiated final goods N10 0.9 Others frequency of price change: prob. of not reoptimizing price0.66 0.66 time discount factor1% 0.99 sensitivity of policy interest rate to inflation 1.5 Note: 1) a and b are calibrated such that the ratios of tradable goods T and imports to GDP are 60% and 30% respectively at the steady state. 2) η K is calibrated such that the ratio of the standard deviation of investment to that of GDP is around 3. 2/3. 19) ψ π Galí and Monacelli(2005) 1.5.,, VAR(1). 20) log log log log 19),,. Burstein et al.(2005) Lee(2009). 20) (2009).

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 23 0. 21) 2. 기준모수설정하에서의통화정책간사회후생비교 <Table 2> 1,. <Table 2> CPIT, DIT I DIT II. FIX., <Table 2> 100 100, (% deviation), 100. 22), Schmitt- Grohé and Uribe(2004) 2. 23),. -826.95-826.92,., -826.13-825.87, 0.1%. 21) 0,. 22), (level). 23) Schmitt-Grohé and Uribe(2004, 2007).

24 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ <Table 2> Simulation Result with Benchmark Parameters CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -826.95-826.39-826.13-826.24 Unconditional -826.92-826.28-825.87-826.19 (0.49) (0.80) (0.78) (0.57) Standard Deviation Consumption 0.96 1.63 1.53 0.76 Labor 2.05 3.09 2.69 0.75 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.66-0.89-0.84 0.32 Real Marginal Cost 1.96 1.77 1.80 2.06 Trade Balance 1.25 2.44 1.81 0.40 Real Exchange Rate 0.96 1.12 1.13 0.79 CPI Inflation 0.46 0.64 0.53 0.26 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.80 0.91 0.80 0.58 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.68 1.04 0.78 0.23 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 0.99 0.99 0.98 1.00 Labor -0.55-0.82-0.74 0.37 Investment 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 Trade Balance 0.48 0.53 0.65 0.54 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP.,,,. <Table 2>

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 25.,, (volatility).,, 1.53%, 0.96% 0.76%.,,. 24),.,., Galí and Monacelli(2005) (intertemporal elasticity of substitution) (elasticity of substitution between domestically produced goods and imported goods) 1,, (optimal monetary policy) (closed economy).. 24) Ramsey Galí and Monacelli(2005) (2008).

26 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ., ( ). Galí and Monacelli(2005), De Paoli(2009), Faia and Monacelli(2008) (2008) Galí and Monacelli(2005) Galí and Monacelli(2005) (inflation gap).,., GDP.,.,, <Table 3>.,., -826.06-825.77.,, -826.99-826.90,.,.,

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 27 <Table 3> Simulation Results with Export/Import Price Shocks Only A. Export Price Shocks Only CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -826.99-826.31-826.06-826.17 Unconditional -826.90 (0.47) -826.04 (0.83) Standard Deviation -825.77 (0.73) -826.24 (0.42) Consumption 0.74 1.51 1.53 0.63 Labor 2.01 2.85 2.74 0.69 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.69-0.89-0.85 0.68 Real Marginal Cost 1.90 1.64 1.78 2.00 Trade Balance 1.19 2.38 1.85 0.36 Real Exchange Rate 0.79 0.97 1.04 0.63 CPI Inflation 0.44 0.61 0.53 0.20 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.75 0.87 0.81 0.58 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.64 1.01 0.80 0.23 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 0.98 0.99 0.98 1.00 Labor -0.53-0.81-0.75 0.74 Investment 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.99 Trade Balance 0.59 0.56 0.67 0.65 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP., 0.82 1.05, 0.90 1.13.,, <Table 3>,

28 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ <Table 3> Continued B. Import Price Shocks Only CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -825.90-826.01-826.01-826.01 Unconditional -825.93 (0.33) -826.00 (0.09) -826.01 (0.09) -826.08 (0.34) Standard Deviation Consumption 0.63 0.21 0.26 0.42 Labor 0.52 0.13 0.09 0.29 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.98 0.21-0.35-0.95 Real Marginal Cost 0.56 0.47 0.48 0.45 Trade Balance 0.46 0.42 0.29 0.19 Real Exchange Rate 0.56 0.47 0.48 0.45 CPI Inflation 0.17 0.13 0.13 0.17 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.32 0.12 0.12 0.07 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.28 0.12 0.08 0.00 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Labor -0.99 0.20-0.35-0.95 Investment 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Trade Balance 0.28 0.10 0.02 0.21 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP..,, 0.11..,

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 29,,. (internal transmission mechanism).,, (real marginal cost).,.,.,.. N. (factor-neutral). 25),,. 25), 1,.

30 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ,,.,., T T.., 1%, (impulse response function). [Figure 2] 1%. [Figure 2],,., [Figure 2] [Figure 3]., [Figure 3]. [Figure 3], (CPIT) (FIX), 0.1%. <Table 2>. <Table 2>, 1.8%, 1.90% 2.00%,.,, Galí(2008)

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 31 1.0 [Figure 2] Impulse Response Functions of Real Marginal Cost to an 1% Export Price Shock 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0-0.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 CPIT DITⅠ DITⅡ FIX 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00-0.02-0.04-0.06 [Figure 3] Differences of Impulse Response Functions of Real Marginal Cost to an 1% Export Price Shock FIX CPIT DITⅠ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 (New Keynesian).,.,., (nonsynchronized)

32 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ.,.,,.,,,. 26),,. 27),,,.,. [Figure 4] 1%,. [Figure 4],,,.,,. 26) Galí(2008). 27), Ramsey,.,.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 33 [Figure 4] Impulse Response Functions of Real Marginal Cost to an 1% Import Price Shock 0.02 0.00-0.02-0.04-0.06-0.08-0.10-0.12-0.14-0.16-0.18 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 CPIT DITⅠ DITⅡ FIX,.,,.,.. 3. 결과의민감성검증.,.,,

34 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ.,,.,, 2. <Table 4> 0.50 0.95. <Table 4>, ( 0.75) ( 0.50),.,,,., ( 0.95). <Table 4>,,., <Table 5>. (variance), <Table 5>,.,., 0.0002, 0.5 ( 0.0003)

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 35 <Table 4> Sensitivity Analysis: Persistence of Shock A. AR(1) Coefficient of Price Shocks = 0.5 CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -826.28-825.83-826.02-826.05 Unconditional -826.27 (0.16) -825.75 (0.26) Standard Deviation -825.97 (0.24) -826.08 (0.28) Consumption 0.41 0.74 0.64 0.49 Labor 1.41 1.86 1.64 0.87 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.33-0.75-0.57 0.42 Real Marginal Cost 1.76 1.63 1.74 1.80 Trade Balance 1.01 2.17 1.31 0.65 Real Exchange Rate 0.40 0.47 0.48 0.37 CPI Inflation 0.28 0.43 0.31 0.18 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.69 0.65 0.63 0.55 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.43 0.75 0.43 0.12 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 Labor -0.22-0.68-0.47 0.45 Investment 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 Trade Balance 0.43 0.50 0.61 0.53 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP., 0.0004 1.1. 28), 28).

36 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ <Table 4> Continued B. AR(1) Coefficient of Price Shocks = 0.95 CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -829.69-831.08-829.92-826.81 Unconditional -829.55 (4.27) -830.38 (6.21) Standard Deviation -829.23 (6.49) -826.58 (3.01) Consumption 2.18 2.99 3.05 1.58 Labor 3.25 4.64 4.55 0.74 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.79-0.91-0.92-0.32 Real Marginal Cost 2.50 2.18 2.17 2.81 Trade Balance 1.34 2.12 2.12 0.18 Real Exchange Rate 2.95 3.24 3.21 2.53 CPI Inflation 0.64 0.79 0.70 0.44 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.94 1.05 0.96 0.75 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.98 1.27 1.08 0.50 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 0.93 0.93 0.93 1.00 Labor -0.56-0.73-0.74-0.25 Investment 0.88 0.89 0.91 0.99 Trade Balance 0.56 0.66 0.62 0.07 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP... <Table 6>, GDP

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 37 <Table 5> Sensitivity Analysis: Volatility of Shock A. Variance of Price Shocks = 0.0002 CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -826.61-826.24-826.07-826.14 Unconditional -826.60 (0.40) -826.18 (0.65) Standard Deviation -825.89 (0.64) -826.09 (0.46) Consumption 0.78 1.33 1.24 0.62 Labor 1.68 2.52 2.19 0.61 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.66-0.89-0.84 0.32 Real Marginal Cost 1.60 1.44 1.47 1.68 Trade Balance 1.02 1.99 1.47 0.33 Real Exchange Rate 0.78 0.92 0.92 0.64 CPI Inflation 0.38 0.53 0.43 0.22 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.65 0.74 0.65 0.47 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.55 0.84 0.63 0.19 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 0.99 0.99 0.98 1.00 Labor -0.55-0.82-0.74 0.37 Investment 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 Trade Balance 0.48 0.53 0.66 0.54 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP.,., GDP,,.

38 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ <Table 5> Continued B. Variance of Price Shocks = 0.0004 CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -827.29-826.54-826.20-826.34 Unconditional -827.23 (0.65) -826.27 (0.86) -825.81 (0.98) -826.37 (0.63) Standard Deviation Consumption 1.13 1.82 1.83 0.90 Labor 2.42 3.41 3.24 0.88 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.67-0.88-0.85 0.30 Real Marginal Cost 2.28 2.00 2.11 2.42 Trade Balance 1.46 2.84 2.10 0.47 Real Exchange Rate 1.13 1.27 1.33 0.92 CPI Inflation 0.54 0.75 0.62 0.31 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.93 1.06 0.93 0.67 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.80 1.21 0.91 0.28 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.00 Labor -0.55-0.81-0.76 0.34 Investment 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 Trade Balance 0.48 0.56 0.63 0.52 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 39 <Table 6> Sensitivity Analysis: Degree of Openness A. Tradable Goods/GDP = 0.5 CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -688.61-688.04-688.02-688.16 Unconditional -688.59 (0.39) -688.01 (0.58) -687.91 (0.55) -688.13 (0.47) Standard Deviation Consumption 1.00 1.52 1.39 0.78 Labor 2.13 2.95 2.61 0.74 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.67-0.86-0.81 0.34 Real Marginal Cost 2.01 1.90 1.90 2.11 Trade Balance 1.10 1.88 1.46 0.36 Real Exchange Rate 0.94 1.05 1.03 0.76 CPI Inflation 0.42 0.53 0.47 0.25 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.66 0.73 0.66 0.41 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.58 0.76 0.64 0.23 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 0.99 0.99 0.98 1.00 Labor -0.56-0.77-0.70 0.38 Investment 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 Trade Balance 0.49 0.53 0.61 0.53 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP.

40 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ <Table 6> Continued B. Tradable Goods/GDP = 0.7 CPIT DIT I DIT II FIX Social Welfare Level Conditional -853.55-853.62-852.92-852.55 Unconditional -853.51 (0.60) -853.29 (0.88) -852.28 (1.11) -852.57 (0.56) Standard Deviation Consumption 0.89 1.59 1.84 0.77 Labor 1.96 2.98 3.03 0.75 (Corr. coefficient between consumption and labor) -0.63-0.91-0.89 0.28 Real Marginal Cost 1.93 1.58 1.72 2.05 Trade Balance 1.26 2.68 2.09 0.42 Real Exchange Rate 0.98 1.18 1.34 0.82 CPI Inflation 0.52 0.77 0.66 0.28 Domestic Goods Price Inf. 0.97 1.11 1.04 0.80 Nontradable Goods Price Inf. 0.81 1.41 1.06 0.24 Correlation Coefficient with GDP Consumption 0.99 0.99 0.98 1.00 Labor -0.51-0.84-0.81 0.32 Investment 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 Trade Balance 0.46 0.55 0.69 0.52 Note: 1) The statistics on the table are computed as average of 100 simulations of 100 quarters. 2) The numbers in parentheses in the row of unconditional social welfare level are standard errors of the variable. 3) All variables except for conditional social welfare and unconditional social welfare are defined as % deviations from their steady state level and the trade balance is defined as a ratio to GDP.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 41 Ⅳ. 결론..,,.,,,.,.,.,,.,,.,., Ramsey,.

42 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ Ramsey,.

소규모개방경제하에서의교역조건충격과통화정책 43 참고문헌,, 2009-16,, 2009.,,, 12 2, 2008, pp.151~179. Burstein, A., M. Eichenbaum, and S. Rebelo, Large Devaluations and the Real Exchange Rate, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 113, No. 4, 2005, pp.742~784. Burstein, A., M. Eichenbaum, and S. Rebelo, Modeling Exchange Rate Passthrough after Large Devaluations, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 54, 2007, pp.364~368. Calvo, G. A., Staggered Prices in a Utility-maximizing Framework, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 12, 1983, pp.383~398. Chari, V. V., P. J. Kehoe, and E. R. Mcgrattan, Can Sticky Price Models Generate Volatile and Persistent Real Exchange Rates? Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 69, 2002, pp.533~563. Correia, I., J. C. Neves, and S. Rebelo, Business Cycles in a Small Open Economy, European Economic Review, Vol. 39, 1995, pp.1089~1113. De Paoli, B., Monetary Policy and Welfare in a Small Open Economy, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 77, 2009, pp.11~22. Faia, E. and T. Monacelli, Optimal Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy with Home Bias, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2008. Galí, J., Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework, Princeton University Press, 2008. Galí, J. and T. Monacelli, Monetary Policy and Exchange Volatility in a Small Open Economy, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 72, 2005, pp.707~734. Goldberg, L. S. and J. M. Campa, Distributional Margins, Imported Inputs, and the Sensitivity of the CPI to Exchange Rates, NBER Working Paper #12121, 2006. Kim, J. and S. H. Kim, Spurious Welfare Reversals in International Business Cycle Models, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 60, 2003, pp.471~500. Kose, M. A., Explaining Business Cycles in Small Open Economies How Much Do World Prices Matter? Journal of International Economics, Vol. 56, 2002, pp.299~327. Lee, H., Dynamics of Relative Price of Nontradable Goods and Heterogeneity in Price Stickiness, Working Paper, KDI, 2009. Letendre, Marc-Andre, Linear Approximation Methods and International Real Business Cycles with

44 韓國開發硏究 / 2011. Ⅰ Incomplete Asset Markets, Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers #1539, 2000. Lubik, T. A. and W. L. Teo, Do World Shocks Drive Domestic Business Cycles? Some Evidence from Structural Estimation, Working Paper, Johns Hopkins University, 2005. Mendoza, E. G., The Terms of Trade, the Real Exchange Rate, and Economic Fluctuations, International Economic Review, Vol. 36, 1995, pp.101~137. Mendoza, E. G. and M. Uribe, Devaluation Risk and the Business-cycle Implications of Exchange Rate Management, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 53, 2000, pp.239~296. Neumeyer, A. and F. Perri, Business Cycles in Emerging Economies: the Role of Interest Rates, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 52, No. 2, 2004, pp.345~380. Rotemberg, J. and M. Woodford, Interest Rate Rules in an Estimated Sticky Price Model, in J. B. Taylor (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules, University of Chicago Press, 1999. Schmitt-Grohé, S. and M. Uribe, Closing Small Open Economy Models, NBER Working Paper #9270, 2002. Schmitt-Grohé, S. and M. Uribe, Solving Dynamic General Equilibrium Models Using a Second-order Approximation to the Policy Function, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 28, 2004, pp.755~775. Schmitt-Grohé, S. and M. Uribe, Optimal Simple and Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 54, 2007, pp.1702~1725. Stockman, A. C. and L. L. Tesar, Tastes and Technology in a Two-country Model of the Business Cycle: Explaining International Comovements, American Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 1, 1995, pp.168~185. Woodford, M., Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy, Princeton University Press, 2003.