한국개발연구 표지_.hwp

Similar documents
, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***

34, 40 34, Blume, Easley and O Hara(1994)..,. (random walk),. Easley and O Hara(1987). Karpoff(1987) (1987) (+). (private information) (public informa

제 출 문 국방부 장관 귀하 본 보고서를 국방부 군인연금과에서 당연구원에 의뢰한 군인연금기금 체 계적 관리방안 연구용역의 최종보고서로 제출합니다 (주)한국채권연구원 대표이사 오 규 철

歯목차.PDF

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 1~26 실물옵션을이용한해상풍력실증단지 사업의경제성평가 1

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 학술 전력시장가격에대한역사적요인분해 * 35

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 1~29 정책 용도별특성을고려한도시가스수요함수의 추정 :, ARDL,,, C4, Q4-1 -

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 1~18 가격비대칭성검정모형민감도분석 1


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯표지_최종H_.PDF

歯목차.PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

untitled

, ( ) * 1) *** *** ,.. (i). (ii).. (iii) (effective spread).,.. I. Debondt and Thaler(1985) (-), (loser) (winner) *.. ** ( ) **

#Ȳ¿ë¼®


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


09김정식.PDF


에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Valuation (DCF Multiple ) VIII Case Study 3 1 NOA, IBD ( 1 ) 2 ( 2 ) 3 (DCF 3 ) 4 WACC (DCF 4 ) 5 EBITDA (Multiple 3 ) 6 Multiple (Multiple 4 ) 7 ( 5

CONTENTS SUMMARY PART 1 MARKET MARKET STRATEGY MARKET ISSUE MARKET ISSUE PART 2 CREDIT CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT ISSUE CREDIT STRA

20, 41..,..,.,.,....,.,, (relevant).,.,..??.,

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

공휴일 전력 수요에 관한 산업별 분석

BSC Discussion 1

untitled


2

02신현화

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

歯스왑노트1

Microsoft PowerPoint - Freebairn, John_ppt

歯3이화진

06_À̼º»ó_0929

<C3D6C1BEBFCFBCBA2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D31C8A3292E687770>

02김헌수(51-72.hwp

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M


에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 57~83 발전용유연탄가격과여타상품가격의 동조화현상에대한실증분석 57


164

......(N)

11¹ÚÇý·É

44-4대지.07이영희532~

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

<C7A5C1F620BEE7BDC4>

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 19~41 석유제품브랜드의자산가치측정 : 휘발유를 중심으로 19

, ( ) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). *

부문별 에너지원 수요의 변동특성 및 공통변동에 미치는 거시적 요인들의 영향력 분석

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Vol.32 No.3 / ISSN x 韓國開發硏究 KDI Journal of Economic Policy 2011 Terms of Trade Shocks and Nontradable Goods Price Inflation Targeting Under a

서론 34 2

歯4차학술대회원고(장지연).PDF


14.531~539(08-037).fm

에너지경제연구 제14권 제1호

Microsoft PowerPoint - ch03ysk2012.ppt [호환 모드]

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

기타자료.PDF

1. 목차_kkh hwp


이용석 박환용 - 베이비부머의 특성에 따른 주택유형 선택 변화 연구.hwp

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 95~118 학술 탄소은행제의가정용전력수요절감효과 분석 1) 2) 3) * ** *** 95


Buy one get one with discount promotional strategy

삼교-1-4.hwp

, 41 ( ) * 1) ***.,. I.,..., ( ) ( ).,. ( ) *. ** 1

untitled

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

歯1.PDF

°í¼®ÁÖ Ãâ·Â


지능정보연구제 16 권제 1 호 2010 년 3 월 (pp.71~92),.,.,., Support Vector Machines,,., KOSPI200.,. * 지능정보연구제 16 권제 1 호 2010 년 3 월

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<C6EDC1FD2DBAB8B0EDBCAD BCF6C1A4292D DBABBB9AE2E687770>


- 2 -

THOMSON REUTERS PRESENTATION TEMPLATE

264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

에너지경제연구 제12권 제2호


04-다시_고속철도61~80p

untitled

<2D3828C8AE29B9DAC3B5B1D42E687770>

<C0CCBDB426C1A4C3A D C532C444C5320BDC3C0E5C0C720B0C7C0FCC7D120BCBAC0E5C0BB20C0A7C7D120B9E6BEC82E687770>

- 1 -

<C3D6C1BE2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D32C8A3292E687770>

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF


untitled

韓國開發硏究제 33 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 112 호 ) 재직자직업훈련관련공적재정의구조와성과 : 효과분석 이철인 ( 서울대학교사회과학대학경제학부교수 ) 유경준 ( 한국개발연구원선임연구위원 ) Training Incentives in the Korean Levy-Gran

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Transcription:

韓國開發硏究제 32 권제 1 호 ( 통권제 106 호 ) 우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 신인석 ( 중앙대학교경영학부부교수 ) 조성빈 ( 한국개발연구원부연구위원 ) Performance Evaluation of Equity Funds in Korea Inseok Shin (Assistant Professor, College of Business Administration, Chung-Ang University) Sungbin Cho (Research Fellow, Korea Development Institute) * 신인석 : (e-mail) ishin@cau.ac.kr, (address) Chung-Ang University, 211 Heukseok-dong Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Korea 조성빈 : (e-mail) scho@kdi.re.kr, (address) Korea Development Institute, 49 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 136-701, Korea Key Word: (Fund Performance), (Efficient Market Hypothesis), (Market Timing) JEL code: G23, G29 Received: 2009. 8. 17 Referee Process Started: 2009. 8. 20 Referee Reports Completed: 2009. 12. 30

ABSTRACT We examine performance of actively managed equity funds in Korea for the period from 2002 to 2008 and investigate if fund managers have market timing abilities. We obtain the following findings: (1) average performance of funds evaluated at net return basis(net of expenses) is statistically indistinguishable from zero; (2) average performance of funds evaluated at gross return basis(before netting expenses) exceeds benchmark market returns significantly. More importantly, when funds are grouped by their size of expenses, higher performance is matched with larger expense; (3) the regression results for decomposing positive excessive returns of large-expense funds between market timing and stock selection ability are mixed. The first two findings of the paper are consistent with the Efficient Market Hypothesis a lá Grossman and Stiglitz(1980). Concluding remarks, however, need to be reserved since sources of excessive performance of funds with large expenses are yet to be clarified.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 99 Ⅰ. 서론..?. (Efficient Market Hypothesis). Grossman(1976) Grossman and Stiglitz (1980),. (agency problem). -.. ( )..,.,. Jensen(1968) 1945 1964., 1970 Henriksson(1984), Chang and Lewellen(1984) 0. Ippolito(1989) 1965 1984., (survivorship bias). ( ) (Elton et al.[1993]; Ferson and Schadt[1996]; Carhart[1997])., 1990 (Malkiel[1995]; Gruber[1996];

100 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ Carhart[1997]; Pastor and Stambaugh [2002]). 0,. Chen, Jegadeesh, and Wermers(2000) Jiang, Yao, and Yu (2007),. Grossman and Stiglitz(1980). 1). (2001) 1998 12 2001 3. (2005) 1999 2003 2., (2005) 2000 7 2003 2 3~4%.... 3 (survivorship bias)... Grossman and Stiglitz(1980). 1. 1) (Lakonishok et al.[1991]; Chevalier and Ellison[1997, 1999]; Carhart et al.[2002]; Gaspar et al.[2006])..

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 101 2002 1 2008 12, 2)... 0. CAPM (Jensen), Fama and French(1993) 3, Ferson and Schadt(1996) CAPM(Conditional CAPM).,.., 4,. Grossman(1976), Grossman and Stiglitz(1980).,... Treynor and Mazuy (1966), Henriksson and Merton(1981) (market timing) (security selection).,.. (Chang and Lewellen[1984]; Ferson and Schadt[1996]; Ferson and Warther [1996]; Edelen[1999]). 2) (2009) 2001 1 2008 5,. 80%,.

102 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ....,..,,.. Ⅱ. 자료및방법론 1. 자료 가. 펀드자료.. 3),.,. 4) (index fund) (active investment)., 2002 1 2008 12.. <Table 1>,,. 2004 2005 2006 3) 100 60 ( 60% ),. 4),.,,,,,,, (2004).

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 103 <Table 1> Summary Information on Fund 1) Year Number of Funds Average Outstanding Balance Average Fund Age 2002 183 208.83 28.33 2003 180 147.19 38.14 2004 212 151.04 40.47 2005 288 606.11 35.60 2006 371 935.44 34.96 2007 458 1378.42 36.43 2008 530 1482.99 42.20 Notes: 1) As of the end of each year. 2) In 100 million KRWON. 3) In months... 나. 펀드수익률자료. : i t, : t, : i j, : j, : j,,,..,,.,.,. 1.

104 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ <Table 2> Trend in Fee Structure Year 1) Management Fee Sales Fee 2) Other Fees Total Fees 2002 0.647 1.641 0.050 2.338 2003 0.641 1.726 0.050 2.417 2004 0.653 1.671 0.111 2.435 2005 0.658 1.619 0.050 2.327 2006 0.665 1.563 0.050 2.278 2007 0.679 1.454 0.050 2.183 2008 0.681 1.426 0.050 2.157 Notes: 1) As of the end of each year. 2) Front-end load and Back-end load included. (Unit: %) Sirri and Tufano(1998), Huang et al.(2007) 7 1/7. <Table 2>. 2.3%,.... = (1 - ) 다. 기타자료및기초통계량 1. 5) KOSPI. (robustness).. 3 WiseFN. 6) 5). 6) 3 10. CD 2007,.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 105 <Table 3> Summary Statistics of Factors Variables Mean Standard Deviation (KOSPI) 0.8142 6.8443-23.1344 12.7090 (Risk-Free Rate) 0.3786 0.0476 0.2701 0.4605 Min Max 1.4331 5.0867-15.2178 14.7776 0.2480 4.9528-14.1843 13.1940 Term Spread 0.0549 0.0371 0.0016 0.1618 Credit Spread 0.2716 0.0527 0.1764 0.3494 Dividend 0.1567 0.0312 0.1061 0.2336 Short-term 0.3378 0.0455 0.2661 0.4273 (Unit: %) Fama and French(1993). 6.,, 30%, 40%, 30%. 6. <Table 3>. 2. 방법론가. 평균펀드투자성과추정방법.., (pooling),,

106 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ. (cross section correlation)., (Ferson and Schadt[1996]). (, ),. 7)., (robustness). 나. 초과성과추정방법 CAPM (), 3, Ferson and Schadt(1996). (1) (2) (3) : t, : t i, (3-1) : t (Market Premium).,,, : t, : t, :, : (conditional variable). 7) Carhart(1997).

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 107 <Table 4> Definition of Conditioning Variables Variable Name Term Spread Credit Spread Dividend Short-term Definition 10-year Treasury bond yield less 1-year Treasury bill yield BBB-rated corporate bond yield less AAA-rated corporate bond yield the dividend yield of the KOSPI index Call rate <Table 5> Explanatory Power of Lagged Conditioning Variables for the Current Market Constant Term Spread(-1) Credit Spread(-1) Dividend (-1) Short-term (-1) Return Dependent Variable: Market Rate of Return (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) 0.8142 (0.7512) 1.6971 (20.3847) 0.8142 (0.7467) 14.2919 (14.2632) 0.8142 (0.7266) 55.7769** (23.4672) 0.8142 (0.7253) -39.2529** (16.0428) 0.8142 (0.7170) -4.7002 (28.0208) -41.1457 (28.9569) 31.0841 (29.2826) -70.2228** (30.7309) R-squared 0.0001 0.012 0.065 0.068 0.1226 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.,,,., Ferson and Schadt (1996). <Table 4>., <Table 5>..

108 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ., p-. (3), (3-1) CAPM (1), 3 (2). (3-1) 3. 3 Fama and French(1993), 3 ( )., (3-1). (3-1) (multi-factor model)., (3-1). 8) (3-1). (3-1). 9) 다. 마켓타이밍추정방법 (market timing) Treynor and Mazuy(1966) Henriksson and Merton (1981). (1), (2) { >0}. { >0} 1 (Indicator Function)...,., { >0} 8) Ferson and Schadt(1996), Ferson(2003). 9),.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 109.. Treynor and Mazuy(1966) (3), (3-1). Henriksson and Merton(1981) (3) (3-1), Ferson and Schadt (1996)., Henriksson and Merton(1981) (3) (3-1).. (4) (4-1), Ⅲ. 분석결과 1. 펀드투자의성과 가. 순수익률 (Net Return) 기준 <Table 6>. 6, 12, 36. CAPM, 0. 3. 3, 0., <Table 6>. (Malkiel[1995]).,

110 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ <Table 6> Net Return Performance of Fund Portfolio Total Sample (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (5) 36 months 0.2548 (0.2359) 0.9030*** (0.0345) 0.2820 (0.2485) 0.9042*** (0.0351) 0.0178 (0.0492) -0.0224 (0.0482) 0.2459 (0.2361) 0.9042*** (0.0346) 0.2742 (0.2488) 0.9055*** (0.0351) 0.0150 (0.0493) -0.0227 (0.0482) 0.2299 (0.2363) 0.9053*** (0.0346) 0.2586 (0.2491) 0.9066*** (0.0351) 0.0147 (0.0493) -0.0229 (0.0483) 0.2491 (0.2388) 0.9121*** (0.0350) 0.2867 (0.2517) 0.9139*** (0.0355) 0.0039 (0.0499) -0.0274 (0.0488) 0.2469 (0.2410) 0.9182*** (0.0353) 0.2866 (0.2540) 0.9201*** (0.0358) 0.0021 (0.0503) -0.0287 (0.0492) R-squared 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.894 0.893 0.894 0.892 0.893 0.892 0.893 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.. <Table 7>.,..., (Ferson and Schadt[1996]; Ferson and Warther[1996]). 나. 총수익률 (Gross Return) 기준 1) 전체표본 <Table 8>. (10% ). 0.42% 5.2%.. <Table 9>,. 12.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 111 <Table 7> Net Return Performance of Fund Portfolio: Conditional Models Total Sample (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months 0.2683 (0.2520) 0.8910*** (0.0375) Term Spread Credit Spread Dividend Short-term 1.4821 (1.6258) -2.5357 (1.7036) 0.9877 (1.4694) -0.4581 (1.1844) 0.2949 (0.2672) 0.8929*** (0.0382) 0.0211 (0.0506) -0.0204 (0.0501) 1.5893 (1.6519) -2.6104 (1.7286) 0.8130 (1.5140) -0.5655 (1.2102) 0.2570 (0.2526) 0.8926*** (0.0376) 1.4452 (1.6293) -2.4516 (1.7073) 0.9933 (1.4726) -0.4412 (1.1869) 0.2846 (0.2679) 0.8945*** (0.0383) 0.0181 (0.0508) -0.0205 (0.0502) 1.5434 (1.6560) -2.5167 (1.7330) 0.8266 (1.5178) -0.5386 (1.2132) 0.2365 (0.2531) 0.8942*** (0.0377) 1.4289 (1.6325) -2.4289 (1.7107) 1.0089 (1.4755) -0.4727 (1.1893) 0.2645 (0.2684) 0.8961*** (0.0383) 0.0180 (0.0509) -0.0208 (0.0503) 1.5274 (1.6593) -2.4938 (1.7364) 0.8411 (1.5208) -0.5703 (1.2156) 0.2458 (0.2558) 0.9030*** (0.0381) 1.4229 (1.6500) -2.5431 (1.7290) 0.9469 (1.4913) -0.6813 (1.2020) 0.2845 (0.2713) 0.9054*** (0.0387) 0.0085 (0.0514) -0.0262 (0.0509) 1.5038 (1.6773) -2.5802 (1.7553) 0.7762 (1.5373) -0.7569 (1.2288) 0.2461 (0.2585) 0.9084*** (0.0385) 1.4442 (1.6673) -2.4443 (1.7471) 0.9755 (1.5070) -0.5844 (1.2146) 0.2872 (0.2742) 0.9109*** (0.0392) 0.0062 (0.0520) -0.0273 (0.0514) 1.5206 (1.6949) -2.4747 (1.7737) 0.8050 (1.5534) -0.6546 (1.2417) R-squared 0.897 0.897 0.897 0.897 0.896 0.897 0.896 0.896 0.895 0.896 Note: Standard errors in parentheses. <Table 8> Gross Return Performance of Fund Portfolio Total Sample (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months 0.4473* (0.2365) 0.9051*** (0.0346) 0.4742* (0.2491) 0.9062*** (0.0351) 0.0180 (0.0494) -0.0222 (0.0483) 0.4388* (0.2366) 0.9063*** (0.0346) 0.4669* (0.2494) 0.9075*** (0.0352) 0.0152 (0.0494) -0.0226 (0.0483) 0.4239* (0.2369) 0.9073*** (0.0347) 0.4524* (0.2496) 0.9086*** (0.0352) 0.0149 (0.0495) -0.0228 (0.0484) 0.4497* (0.2394) 0.9140*** (0.0350) 0.4872* (0.2523) 0.9158*** (0.0356) 0.0038 (0.0500) -0.0273 (0.0489) 0.4519* (0.2416) 0.9201*** (0.0354) 0.4916* (0.2546) 0.9220*** (0.0359) 0.0019 (0.0504) -0.0286 (0.0494) R-squared 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.894 0.893 0.894 0.892 0.893 0.892 0.892 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.

112 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ <Table 9> Gross Return Performance of Fund Portfolio: Conditional Models Total Sample (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months 0.4608* (0.2526) 0.8929*** (0.0376) 0.4871* (0.2679) 0.8949*** (0.0383) 0.0213 (0.0508) -0.0202 (0.0502) 0.4499* (0.2532) 0.8945*** (0.0377) 0.4772* (0.2685) 0.8964*** (0.0383) 0.0183 (0.0509) -0.0204 (0.0503) 0.4305* (0.2537) 0.8961*** (0.0377) 0.4582* (0.2690) 0.8981*** (0.0384) 0.0181 (0.0510) -0.0206 (0.0504) 0.4461* (0.2564) 0.9048*** (0.0381) 0.4847* (0.2720) 0.9072*** (0.0388) 0.0084 (0.0516) -0.0260 (0.0510) 0.4509* (0.2591) 0.9102*** (0.0385) 0.4918* (0.2749) 0.9127*** (0.0392) 0.0060 (0.0521) -0.0271 (0.0515) Term Spread 1.4942 (1.6297) 1.6016 (1.6559) 1.4574 (1.6332) 1.5559 (1.6600) 1.4412 (1.6362) 1.5399 (1.6631) 1.4418 (1.6539) 1.5221 (1.6813) 1.4648 (1.6714) 1.5402 (1.6991) Credit Spread -2.5396 (1.7077) -2.6148 (1.7328) -2.4557 (1.7114) -2.5214 (1.7371) -2.4343 (1.7146) -2.4998 (1.7404) -2.5561 (1.7331) -2.5929 (1.7595) -2.4592 (1.7514) -2.4889 (1.7781) Dividend 0.9977 (1.4730) 0.8235 (1.5177) 1.0033 (1.4761) 0.8369 (1.5214) 1.0182 (1.4789) 0.8507 (1.5243) 0.9640 (1.4948) 0.7944 (1.5410) 0.9947 (1.5106) 0.8258 (1.5573) Short-term -0.4540 (1.1872) -0.5617 (1.2131) -0.4372 (1.1898) -0.5350 (1.2161) -0.4697 (1.1920) -0.5677 (1.2184) -0.6793 (1.2049) -0.7543 (1.2317) -0.5815 (1.2176) -0.6507 (1.2448) R-squared 0.897 0.897 0.897 0.897 0.896 0.897 0.896 0.896 0.895 0.896 Note: Standard errors in parentheses. 2) 보수수준별추정 Grossman and Stiglitz(1980),,.. 4. <Table 10>, <Table 11>. <Table 10>. <Table 11> <Table 10>., CAPM

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 113 <Table 10> Gross Return Performance of Fund Portfolio: by Total Fee Level Total Fee 1.5 1.5< 2.0 2.0< 2.5 2.5< 0.3507 (0.2314) 0.8637*** (0.0339) 0.3308 (0.2408) 0.8622*** (0.0340) 0.0739 (0.0477) 0.0016 (0.0467) 0.3904 (0.2502) 0.8988*** (0.0366) 0.3525 (0.2605) 0.8963*** (0.0367) 0.0794 (0.0516) 0.0135 (0.0505) 0.4541* (0.2347) 0.8863*** (0.0344) 0.4744* (0.2470) 0.8871*** (0.0348) 0.0277 (0.0489) -0.0192 (0.0479) 0.4817* (0.2490) 0.9275*** (0.0365) 0.5322** (0.2623) 0.9300*** (0.0370) -0.0101 (0.0520) -0.0342 (0.0508) R-squared 0.888 0.891 0.880 0.884 0.890 0.891 0.888 0.888 Note: Standard errors in parentheses. <Table 11> Gross Return Performance of Fund Portfolio: by Total Fee Level - Conditional Models Total Fee 1.5 1.5< 2.0 2.0< 2.5 2.5< 0.4087* (0.2419) 0.8443*** (0.0360) Term Spread Credit Spread Dividend Short-term 0.9828 (1.5601) -2.3852 (1.6348) 1.1151 (1.4101) 0.1894 (1.1365) 0.3736 (0.2537) 0.8435*** (0.0362) 0.0692 (0.0481) 0.0116 (0.0476) 1.1690 (1.5680) -2.5991 (1.6409) 0.9808 (1.4372) -0.0206 (1.1487) 0.4248 (0.2687) 0.8852*** (0.0400) 1.6252 (1.7334) -2.1828 (1.8164) 0.7963 (1.5667) -0.1589 (1.2628) 0.3859 (0.2810) 0.8844*** (0.0401) 0.0849 (0.0533) 0.0116 (0.0527) 1.8592 (1.7370) -2.4462 (1.8178) 0.6168 (1.5920) -0.4212 (1.2725) 0.4705* (0.2503) 0.8738*** (0.0372) 1.5615 (1.6144) -2.6386 (1.6917) 0.9860 (1.4591) -0.4757 (1.1761) 0.4905* (0.2650) 0.8755*** (0.0378) 0.0318 (0.0502) -0.0179 (0.0497) 1.6958 (1.6380) -2.7460 (1.7142) 0.7947 (1.5013) -0.6141 (1.2000) 0.4809* (0.2665) 0.9182*** (0.0397) 1.5177 (1.7194) -2.7201 (1.8017) 0.9166 (1.5540) -0.7562 (1.2526) 0.5343* (0.2826) 0.9212*** (0.0404) -0.0051 (0.0536) -0.0334 (0.0530) 1.5725 (1.7470) -2.7172 (1.8282) 0.7446 (1.6012) -0.7997 (1.2798) R-squared 0.897 0.899 0.883 0.887 0.895 0.896 0.891 0.892 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.

114 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ.. 3) 보수수준과펀드별총수익률기준초과성과의관계추정 <Table 11>.. 9 CAPM 3.,,. 10) (heteroskedasticity) (autocorrelation) Newey- West. <Table 12>,,,. 2. 펀드매니저의마켓타이밍능력 (market timing). Treynor and Mazuy (1966) Henriksson and Merton(1981) <Table 13> Panel A B.., p- 11~ 12%.... (Chang and Lewellen[1984]) 10) Chen et al.(2004), Ferris and Yan(2009), Nanda et al.(2004).

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 115 <Table 12> Relationship between Gross Returns and Fee Level Constant ln(fundsize) Fundage Flow Total Fee Sales Fee (including load) Sales Fee (excluding load) Mgmt Fee Load Dummy 0.1409 (0.3720) 0.0032 (0.0149) -0.0003 (0.0010) 0.2828* (0.1620) 1.2272** (0.5406) 0.0175 (0.0608) CAPM Adjusted 0.1325 (0.3742) 0.0035 (0.0149) -0.0003 (0.0010) 0.2860* (0.1620) 1.1745** (0.5458) 1.3687** (0.6284) 0.0182 (0.0628) Dependent Variable: Gross Fund Return 0.1313 (0.3743) 0.0035 (0.0149) -0.0003 (0.0010) 0.2864* (0.1618) 1.1809** (0.5496) 1.3702** (0.6306) 0.0978 (0.0686) 0.0443 (0.3439) 0.0063 (0.0137) 0.0000 (0.0009) 0.2587* (0.1372) 1.4054*** (0.5389) 0.0337 (0.0602) 3 Factor Adjusted 0.0287 (0.3446) 0.0068 (0.0138) 0.0001 (0.0009) 0.2632* (0.1370) 1.2642** (0.5485) 1.8228*** (0.6129) 0.0366 (0.0620) 0.0263 (0.3448) 0.0068 (0.0138) 0.0001 (0.0009) 0.2635* (0.1367) 1.2902** (0.5500) 1.8283*** (0.6143) 0.1238* (0.0701) No. of Obs 23957 23957 23957 23957 23957 23957 Average R-squared 0.101 0.105 0.105 0.104 0.108 0.108 Note: The t-statistics are adjusted for serial correlation using Newey-West (1987) lags of order two and are shown in parentheses. (Jagannathan and Korajczyk[1986]; Glosten and Jagannathan[1994]),. Ferson and Schadt(1996). <Table 14> <Table 15>. p-.,..,

116 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ <Table 13> Estimation of Market Timing Ability Panel A: Treynor-Mazuy Model Total Fee 1.5 1.5< 2.0 2.0< 2.5 2.5< 0.6131** (0.2783) 0.8463*** (0.0351) -0.0055 (0.0033) 0.5496* (0.2847) 0.8463*** (0.0355) 0.0639 (0.0479) 0.0120 (0.0470) -0.0048 (0.0034) 0.4528 (0.3057) 0.8946*** (0.0386) -0.0013 (0.0036) 0.3751 (0.3119) 0.8947*** (0.0389) 0.0784 (0.0525) 0.0146 (0.0514) -0.0005 (0.0037) 0.5112* (0.2867) 0.8825*** (0.0362) -0.0012 (0.0034) 0.5022* (0.2957) 0.8851*** (0.0369) 0.0264 (0.0498) -0.0179 (0.0488) -0.0006 (0.0035) 0.5106* (0.3044) 0.9256*** (0.0384) -0.0006 (0.0036) 0.5450* (0.3141) 0.9291*** (0.0392) -0.0107 (0.0529) -0.0336 (0.0518) -0.0003 (0.0037) R-squared 0.892 0.894 0.880 0.884 0.890 0.891 0.888 0.888 Panel B: Henriksson-Merton Model Total Fee 1.5 1.5< 2.0 2.0< 2.5 2.5< 0.7674* (0.4001) 0.9314*** (0.0629) -0.1491 (0.1170) 0.7023* (0.4021) 0.9239*** (0.0634) 0.0706 (0.0477) 0.0108 (0.0473) -0.1373 (0.1191) 0.4503 (0.4368) 0.9085*** (0.0687) -0.0214 (0.1277) 0.3771 (0.4387) 0.9004*** (0.0692) 0.0792 (0.0520) 0.0141 (0.0516) -0.0091 (0.1299) 0.5126 (0.4097) 0.8958*** (0.0645) -0.0210 (0.1198) 0.4894 (0.4159) 0.8896*** (0.0656) 0.0275 (0.0493) -0.0188 (0.0489) -0.0055 (0.1232) 0.4779 (0.4348) 0.9269*** (0.0684) 0.0014 (0.1271) 0.4900 (0.4416) 0.9230*** (0.0697) -0.0097 (0.0524) -0.0353 (0.0519) 0.0156 (0.1308) R-squared 0.890 0.893 0.880 0.884 0.890 0.891 0.888 0.888 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.,. <Table 14, 15>.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 117 <Table 14> Estimation of Market Timing Ability-Conditional, Treynor-Mazuy Model Total Fee 1.5 1.5< 2.0 2.0< 2.5 2.5< 0.5557* (0.2960) 0.5031 (0.3025) 0.4384 (0.3305) 0.3814 (0.3365) 0.4863 (0.3078) 0.4895 (0.3173) 0.5051 (0.3278) 0.5444 (0.3384) 0.8398*** (0.0364) 0.8389*** (0.0368) 0.8848*** (0.0407) 0.8846*** (0.0409) 0.8733*** (0.0379) 0.8756*** (0.0386) 0.9174*** (0.0403) 0.9208*** (0.0411) 0.0669 (0.0483) 0.0849 (0.0537) 0.0318 (0.0506) -0.0053 (0.0540) 0.0160 (0.0480) 0.0115 (0.0534) -0.0179 (0.0504) -0.0331 (0.0537) -0.0040 (0.0047) -0.0037 (0.0047) -0.0004 (0.0052) 0.0001 (0.0053) -0.0004 (0.0049) 0.0000 (0.0050) -0.0007 (0.0052) -0.0003 (0.0053) Term Spread 1.0382 (1.5639) 1.2041 (1.5725) 1.6303 (1.7460) 1.8580 (1.7493) 1.5675 (1.6261) 1.6956 (1.6496) 1.5268 (1.7318) 1.5752 (1.7592) Credit Spread -2.7678 (1.6963) -2.9437* (1.7018) -2.2181 (1.8938) -2.4344 (1.8930) -2.6799 (1.7637) -2.7433 (1.7852) -2.7831 (1.8783) -2.7442 (1.9038) Dividend 0.9597 (1.4238) 0.8684 (1.4477) 0.7819 (1.5895) 0.6206 (1.6104) 0.9693 (1.4804) 0.7956 (1.5186) 0.8910 (1.5765) 0.7358 (1.6196) Short-term -0.6340 (1.4848) -0.7659 (1.4886) -0.2348 (1.6576) -0.3958 (1.6558) -0.5645 (1.5438) -0.6084 (1.5615) -0.8918 (1.6441) -0.8581 (1.6653) R-squared 0.898 0.900 0.883 0.887 0.895 0.896 0.891 0.892 Note: Standard errors in parentheses. ( ),... (Ferson and Warther[1996]; Edelen [1999]).

118 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ <Table 15> Estimation of Market Timing Ability-Conditional, Henriksson-Merton Model Total Fee 1.5 1.5< 2.0 2.0< 2.5 2.5< 0.4934 (0.3750) 0.4782 (0.3791) 0.2941 (0.4097) 0.2810 (0.4132) 0.3514 (0.3876) 0.3640 (0.3936) 0.3269 (0.4142) 0.3565 (0.4195) 0.8606*** (0.0769) 0.8656*** (0.0776) 0.8756*** (0.0840) 0.8811*** (0.0846) 0.8649*** (0.0794) 0.8643*** (0.0806) 0.9004*** (0.0849) 0.8952*** (0.0859) 0.0481 (0.0490) 0.0609 (0.0534) 0.0122 (0.0509) -0.0268 (0.0542) 0.0108 (0.0482) 0.0041 (0.0525) -0.0233 (0.0500) -0.0394 (0.0533) * -0.0425 (0.1253) -0.0505 (0.1278) 0.0356 (0.1369) 0.0292 (0.1392) 0.0317 (0.1295) 0.0397 (0.1326) 0.0465 (0.1384) 0.0639 (0.1414) Term Spread 0.9801 (2.6534) 0.8748 (2.6806) 1.6392 (2.8987) 1.5441 (2.9216) 1.2826 (2.7421) 1.3595 (2.7829) 1.1262 (2.9302) 1.3175 (2.9661) Credit Spread -4.0108 (2.6544) -4.0115 (2.6734) -4.8556* (2.8998) -4.8557 (2.9136) -4.9774* (2.7431) -4.9753* (2.7753) -5.1363* (2.9314) -5.1332* (2.9580) Dividend 2.8006 (2.1466) 2.5829 (2.1783) 3.6907 (2.3451) 3.3882 (2.3741) 3.1688 (2.2183) 3.0406 (2.2614) 2.9649 (2.3706) 2.9925 (2.4103) Short-term -0.2351 (1.6626) -0.4750 (1.6924) -1.0849 (1.8163) -1.3907 (1.8445) -1.4288 (1.7182) -1.4954 (1.7569) -1.6988 (1.8361) -1.5725 (1.8726) * Term Spread -1.0478 (3.2887) -0.5895 (3.3485) -1.3399 (3.5928) -0.7982 (3.6495) -0.5397 (3.3987) -0.5278 (3.4762) -0.3617 (3.6319) -0.7506 (3.7051) * Credit Spread 1.4932 (3.4334) 1.3697 (3.4609) 3.3815 (3.7509) 3.2139 (3.7719) 3.3191 (3.5482) 3.2573 (3.5928) 3.6278 (3.7917) 3.6575 (3.8294) * Dividend -5.8709* (3.2125) -5.3189 (3.2977) -8.3069** (3.5095) -7.6774** (3.5941) -6.0850* (3.3199) -6.1326* (3.4235) -5.7814 (3.5477) -6.3291* (3.6488) * Short-term -3.5844 (2.9445) -3.0625 (3.0145) -2.8089 (3.2167) -2.1779 (3.2855) -1.4153 (3.0429) -1.3632 (3.1295) -1.1802 (3.2517) -1.5736 (3.3355) R-squared 0.907 0.908 0.898 0.900 0.905 0.906 0.901 0.902 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 119.. Ⅳ. 강건성검증, <Table 16>.. CAPM 3 0.. 1. 설정액기준가중평균포트폴리오사용.. (value-weighted portfolio)., (Sirri and Tufano[1998]),.. 2. 펀드별벤치마크사용 (Roll [1971]; Lehman and Modest[1987]; Admati et al.[1986]; Conner and Korajczyk[1991]; Grinblatt and Titman[1989]). Elton, Gruber, Das, and Hlavka(1993)...

120 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ <Table 16> Reestimating Performance of Fund Portfolio: Value-weighted Portfolio Total Sample Panel A: Net Return Performance (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months 0.2988 (0.2594) 0.9304*** (0.0380) 0.3613 (0.2729) 0.9335*** (0.0385) -0.0138 (0.0541) -0.0422 (0.0529) 0.2988 (0.2594) 0.9304*** (0.0380) 0.3613 (0.2729) 0.9335*** (0.0385) -0.0138 (0.0541) -0.0422 (0.0529) 0.2990 (0.2595) 0.9302*** (0.0380) 0.3615 (0.2730) 0.9334*** (0.0385) -0.0139 (0.0541) -0.0422 (0.0529) 0.3116 (0.2589) 0.9293*** (0.0379) 0.3736 (0.2724) 0.9324*** (0.0384) -0.0147 (0.0540) -0.0417 (0.0528) 0.3197 (0.2615) 0.9293*** (0.0383) 0.3866 (0.2750) 0.9327*** (0.0388) -0.0189 (0.0545) -0.0445 (0.0533) R-squared 0.880 0.881 0.880 0.881 0.880 0.881 0.880 0.881 0.878 0.879 Total Sample Panel B: Gross Return Performance (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months 0.5016* (0.2600) 0.9325*** (0.0381) 0.5640** (0.2736) 0.9356*** (0.0386) -0.0139 (0.0542) -0.0421 (0.0530) 0.5016* (0.2600) 0.9325*** (0.0381) 0.5641** (0.2736) 0.9356*** (0.0386) -0.0139 (0.0542) -0.0421 (0.0530) 0.5023* (0.2601) 0.9324*** (0.0381) 0.5647** (0.2736) 0.9355*** (0.0386) -0.0140 (0.0542) -0.0420 (0.0530) 0.5176** (0.2595) 0.9314*** (0.0380) 0.5795** (0.2731) 0.9345*** (0.0385) -0.0149 (0.0541) -0.0416 (0.0529) 0.5273** (0.2621) 0.9314*** (0.0384) 0.5942** (0.2756) 0.9348*** (0.0389) -0.0191 (0.0546) -0.0444 (0.0534) R-squared 0.880 0.881 0.880 0.881 0.880 0.881 0.880 0.881 0.878 0.879 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.. <Table 17>. KOSPI. 0.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 121 <Table 17> Reestimating Performance of Fund Portfolio: Against Preannounced Target Benchmark Portfolio Total Sample Panel A: Net Return Performance (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months 0.2461 (0.2489) 0.9171*** (0.0373) 0.2732 (0.2611) 0.9189*** (0.0377) 0.0413 (0.0517) -0.0266 (0.0506) 0.2370 (0.2486) 0.9187*** (0.0372) 0.2655 (0.2609) 0.9205*** (0.0376) 0.0383 (0.0517) -0.0271 (0.0506) 0.2209 (0.2485) 0.9199*** (0.0372) 0.2500 (0.2608) 0.9218*** (0.0376) 0.0381 (0.0516) -0.0275 (0.0506) 0.2250 (0.2507) 0.9249*** (0.0374) 0.2588 (0.2632) 0.9271*** (0.0379) 0.0337 (0.0521) -0.0301 (0.0510) 0.2158 (0.2537) 0.9315*** (0.0379) 0.2516 (0.2664) 0.9337*** (0.0384) 0.0324 (0.0527) -0.0313 (0.0516) R-squared 0.881 0.882 0.881 0.883 0.882 0.883 0.882 0.883 0.880 0.882 Total Sample Panel B: Gross Return Performance (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months 0.4386* (0.2495) 0.9192*** (0.0373) 0.4655* (0.2617) 0.9210*** (0.0377) 0.0416 (0.0518) -0.0265 (0.0508) 0.4299* (0.2492) 0.9208*** (0.0373) 0.4582* (0.2615) 0.9226*** (0.0377) 0.0386 (0.0518) -0.0269 (0.0507) 0.4149* (0.2491) 0.9220*** (0.0373) 0.4437* (0.2614) 0.9238*** (0.0377) 0.0383 (0.0518) -0.0273 (0.0507) 0.4255* (0.2513) 0.9269*** (0.0375) 0.4592* (0.2638) 0.9291*** (0.0380) 0.0337 (0.0522) -0.0300 (0.0512) 0.4207 (0.2543) 0.9335*** (0.0380) 0.4565* (0.2670) 0.9358*** (0.0385) 0.0323 (0.0529) -0.0313 (0.0518) R-squared 0.881 0.882 0.881 0.883 0.882 0.883 0.882 0.883 0.880 0.882 Note: Standard errors in parentheses... Sensoy(2009),

122 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ,. 3. 운용스타일별추정. ( 80% ) ( 60~ 80%). <Table 18> <Table 19>.,.,. Ⅴ. 결론 2002 1 2008 12.., 0., 0. 5.2%., 4,., Treynor and Mazuy(1966) Henriksson and Merton (1981),. Grossman and Stiglitz(1980)., ( ). ( 0 ).

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 123 <Table 18> Reestimating Performance of Fund Portfolio: by Investment Style (Aggressive Type - Equity Holding 80% over) Total Sample Panel A: Net Return Performance (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor 0.2472 (0.2357) 0.9006*** (0.0345) 0.2746 (0.2484) 0.9018*** (0.0350) 0.0151 (0.0492) -0.0221 (0.0482) 0.2383 (0.2359) 0.9021*** (0.0345) 0.2672 (0.2487) 0.9034*** (0.0351) 0.0125 (0.0493) -0.0227 (0.0482) 0.2245 (0.2365) 0.9035*** (0.0346) 0.2543 (0.2492) 0.9048*** (0.0352) 0.0122 (0.0494) -0.0234 (0.0483) 0.2399 (0.2395) 0.9129*** (0.0351) 0.2799 (0.2524) 0.9148*** (0.0356) 0.0030 (0.0500) -0.0290 (0.0489) 0.2370 (0.2415) 0.9183*** (0.0354) 0.2792 (0.2545) 0.9203*** (0.0359) 0.0010 (0.0504) -0.0302 (0.0493) R-squared 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.892 0.893 0.892 0.892 Total Sample Panel B: Gross Return Performance (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor 0.4409* (0.2363) 0.9026*** (0.0346) 0.4680* (0.2490) 0.9038*** (0.0351) 0.0153 (0.0493) -0.0219 (0.0483) 0.4324* (0.2365) 0.9042*** (0.0346) 0.4610* (0.2493) 0.9054*** (0.0352) 0.0127 (0.0494) -0.0225 (0.0483) 0.4196* (0.2370) 0.9055*** (0.0347) 0.4492* (0.2498) 0.9068*** (0.0352) 0.0123 (0.0495) -0.0232 (0.0484) 0.4412* (0.2401) 0.9149*** (0.0351) 0.4810* (0.2530) 0.9168*** (0.0357) 0.0029 (0.0501) -0.0289 (0.0490) 0.4430* (0.2421) 0.9202*** (0.0354) 0.4851* (0.2552) 0.9223*** (0.0360) 0.0008 (0.0506) -0.0301 (0.0495) R-squared 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.893 0.892 0.893 0.892 0.892 Note: Standard errors in parentheses....

124 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ <Table 19> Reestimating Performance of Fund Portfolio: by Investment Style Total Sample Panel A: Net Return Performance (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor 0.3647 (0.2404) 0.9192*** (0.0352) 0.3201 (0.2503) 0.9170*** (0.0354) 0.0607 (0.0497) 0.0240 (0.0507) 0.3612 (0.2402) 0.9185*** (0.0352) 0.3152 (0.2501) 0.9162*** (0.0354) 0.0604 (0.0496) 0.0251 (0.0506) 0.3411 (0.2393) 0.9193*** (0.0351) 0.2920 (0.2490) 0.9169*** (0.0352) 0.0621 (0.0494) 0.0272 (0.0504) 0.4028* (0.2353) 0.8959*** (0.0345) 0.3470 (0.2455) 0.8934*** (0.0348) 0.0457 (0.0487) 0.0357 (0.0497) 0.4015* (0.2406) 0.9127*** (0.0353) 0.3477 (0.2511) 0.9103*** (0.0355) 0.0490 (0.0498) 0.0334 (0.0508) R-squared 0.894 0.896 0.894 0.896 0.895 0.897 0.893 0.894 0.892 0.894 Total Sample Panel B: Gross Return Performance (1) 6 months (2) 12 months (3) 24 months (4) 36 months CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor CAPM 3Factor 0.5382** (0.2409) 0.9210*** (0.0353) (Growth Type - Equity Holding 60~80%) 0.4935* (0.2507) 0.9188*** (0.0355) 0.0616 (0.0498) 0.0238 (0.0508) 0.5347** (0.2407) 0.9202*** (0.0353) 0.4886* (0.2505) 0.9180*** (0.0355) 0.0614 (0.0497) 0.0250 (0.0507) 0.5147** (0.2398) 0.9211*** (0.0352) 0.4656* (0.2494) 0.9187*** (0.0353) 0.0631 (0.0495) 0.0270 (0.0505) 0.5818** (0.2357) 0.8973*** (0.0345) 0.5263** (0.2459) 0.8948*** (0.0348) 0.0464 (0.0488) 0.0354 (0.0498) 0.5788** (0.2411) 0.9142*** (0.0353) 0.5253** (0.2515) 0.9118*** (0.0356) 0.0497 (0.0499) 0.0331 (0.0509) R-squared 0.894 0.896 0.894 0.896 0.894 0.897 0.893 0.894 0.892 0.894 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 125 참고문헌,,, 18 1, 2005, pp.31~67.,,, 29, 2001, pp.117~143., :, 2004-16,, 2004.,,, 2009.,,, 2005. Admati, R. A., S. Bhattacharya, P. Pfleiderer, and S. A. Ross, On Timing and Selectivity, Journal of Finance, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1986, pp.715~730. Carhart, M., On The Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 1, 1997, pp.57~82. Carhart, M., J. N. Carpenter, A. N. Lynch, and D. K. Musto, Mutual Fund Survivorship, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2002, pp.1439~1463. Chang, E. C. and W. G. Lewellen, Market Timing and Mutual Fund Investment Performance, Journal of Business, Vol. 57, No. 1, 1984, pp.57~72. Chen, H. L., N. Jegadeesh, and R. Wermers, The Value of Active Mutual Fund Management: An Examination of The Stockholdings and Trades of Fund Managers, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2000, pp.343~368. Chen, Joseph, Harrison Hong, Ming Huang, and Jeffrey Kubik, Does Fund Size Erode Performance? The Role of Liquidity, Organization, American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 5, 2004, pp.1276~1302. Chevalier, J. and G. Ellison, Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, No. 6, 1997, pp.1167~1200. Chevalier, J. and G. Ellison, Career Concerns of Mutual Fund Managers, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 2, 1999, pp.389~432. Conner, G. and R. Korajczyk, The Attributes Behavior and Performance of U.S. Mutual Funds, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1991, pp.4~25.

126 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ Edelen, R. M., Investor Flows and The Assessed Performance of Open-end Mutual Funds, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 53, Issue 3, 1999, pp.439~466. Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber, S. Das, and M. Hlavka, Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1993, pp.1~22. Fama, E. and K. French, Common Risk Factors in The Returns on Bonds and Stocks, Journal of financial Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1993, pp.3~56. Ferson, W. E., Tests of Multifactor Pricing Models, Volatility Bounds and Portfolio Performance, Ch. 12, in G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, and R. M. Stulz (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Elsevier, North Holland, 2003. Ferson, W. E. and R. Schadt, Measuring Fund Strategy and Performance in Changing Economic Conditions, Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, No. 2, 1996, pp.425~461. Ferson, W. E. and V. A. Warther, Evaluating Fund Performance in a Dynamic Market, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 52, No. 6, 1996, pp.20~28. Ferris, S. P. and X. Yan, Agency Costs, Governance, and Organizational Forms: Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 33, 2009, pp.619~626. Gaspar, J. M., M. Massa, and P. Matos, Favoritism in Mutual Fund Families? Evidence on Strategic Cross-Fund Subsidization, Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2006, pp.73~104. Glosten, L. and R. Jagannathan, A Contingent Claims Approach to Performance Evaluation, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 1, 1994, pp.133~166. Grinblatt, M. and S. Titman, Portfolio Performance Evaluation: Old Issues and Insights, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1989, pp.393~421. Grossman, S. J., On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information, Journal of Finance, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1976, pp.573~585. Grossman, S. J. and J. E. Stiglitz, On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets, American Economic Review, Vol. 70, No. 3, 1980, pp.393~408. Gruber, M. J., Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds, Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1996, pp.783~810. Henriksson, R. D., Market Timing and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Business, Vol. 57, No. 1, Part 1, 1984, pp.73~96. Henriksson, R. and R. Merton, On Market Timing and Investment Performance II: Statistical Procedures for Evaluating Forecasting Skills, Journal of Business, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1981, pp.513~533. Ippolito, R. A., Efficiency with Costly Information: A Study of Mutual Fund Performance, 1965-1984, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 104, No. 1, 1989, pp.1~23. Jagannathan, R. and R. Korajczyk, Assessing the Market Timing Performance of Managed Portfolios, Journal of Business, Vol. 59, 1986, pp.217~236

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 127 Jensen, M. C., The Performance of Mutual Funds in The Period 1945-1964, Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1968, pp.389~416. Jiang, G. J., T. Yao, and T. Yu, Do Mutual Funds Time The Market? Evidence from Portfolio Holdings, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 86, Issue 3, 2007, pp.724~758. Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, R. Thaler, and R. W. Vishny, Window Dressing by Pension Fund Managers, American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 2, 1991, pp.227~231. Lehman, B. and D. Modest, Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1987, pp.233~265. Malkiel, B. G., Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991, Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1995, pp.549~572. Nanda, Z. Vikram, Jay Wang, and Lu Zheng, Family Values and the Star Phenomenon: Strategies of Mutual Fund Families, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 17, 2004, pp.667~698. Pastor, L. and R. F. Stambaugh, Mutual Fund Performance and Seemingly Unrelated Assets, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 63, Issue 3, 2002, pp.315~349. Roll, R., Sensitivity of Performance Measurement Index Choice Commonly Used Indices, Working Paper, University of California, 1971. Sensoy, B., Performance Evaluation and Self-designated Benchmark Indexes in the Mutual Fund Industry, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 92, 2009, pp.25~39. Sirri, E. R. and P. Tufano, Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows, Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 5, 1998, pp.1589~1622. Treynor, J. L. and K. K. Mazuy, Can Mutual Funds Outguess The Market, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 44, Issue 4, 1996, pp.131~136.

128 韓國開發硏究 / 2010.Ⅰ <Appendix> <Table A-1> Net Return Performance of Fund Portfolio: Conditional Models - Alternative Specification (1) (2) (3) (4) Total Sample survived longer survived longer survived longer survived longer than 6 months than 12 months than 24 months than 36 months 0.3108 0.2973 0.2758 0.2871 0.2869 (0.2895) (0.2904) (0.2911) (0.2944) (0.2974) 0.8838*** 0.8859*** 0.8877*** 0.8968*** 0.9019*** (0.0422) (0.0423) (0.0424) (0.0429) (0.0433) 0.0136 0.0114 0.0120 0.0019-0.0005 (0.0589) (0.0591) (0.0593) (0.0599) (0.0605) -0.0193-0.0196-0.0198-0.0240-0.0244 (0.0542) (0.0544) (0.0545) (0.0551) (0.0557) Term Spread 1.4446 1.4008 1.3849 1.3387 1.3482 (1.8869) (1.8928) (1.8972) (1.9183) (1.9383) Credit Spread -2.7044 (1.9050) -2.6064 (1.9109) -2.5841 (1.9153) -2.6842 (1.9366) -2.5967 (1.9568) Dividend 0.5304 0.5772 0.6061 0.5935 0.6302 (1.7649) (1.7704) (1.7745) (1.7942) (1.8129) Short-term -0.8390 (1.4168) -0.7856 (1.4212) -0.7974 (1.4245) -0.9756 (1.4403) -0.8722 (1.4553) Term Spread -0.4771 (1.9708) -0.5301 (1.9769) -0.5557 (1.9815) -0.7193 (2.0036) -0.8039 (2.0244) Credit Spread 0.7389 (2.2330) 0.6422 (2.2399) 0.5381 (2.2451) 0.3963 (2.2701) 0.2840 (2.2937) Dividend 0.1150 (2.3258) -0.0049 (2.3330) -0.1095 (2.3384) -0.1398 (2.3644) -0.2030 (2.3890) Short-term 0.6538 (2.4479) 0.5249 (2.4555) 0.3926 (2.4612) 0.1846 (2.4886) 0.0246 (2.5145) Term Spread -0.6257 (2.2450) -0.6145 (2.2519) -0.5741 (2.2572) -0.6047 (2.2823) -0.6183 (2.3060) Credit Spread 0.1537 (2.2804) 0.1960 (2.2875) 0.1312 (2.2928) 0.1976 (2.3183) 0.0909 (2.3424) Dividend -1.0752 (2.5830) -1.0231 (2.5911) -1.0176 (2.5971) -1.0994 (2.6259) -1.2204 (2.6533) Short-term -1.4657 (2.7889) -1.3801 (2.7976) -1.4148 (2.8041) -1.3422 (2.8352) -1.4766 (2.8648) R-squared 0.899 0.898 0.898 0.897 0.897 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.

우리나라주식형펀드의투자성과평가 129 <Table A-2> Gross Return Performance of Fund Portfolio: Conditional Models - Alternative Specification Total Sample 0.5029* (0.2902) 0.8857*** (0.0423) 0.0138 (0.0591) -0.0191 (0.0544) Term Spread 1.4547 (1.8914) Credit -2.7065 Spread (1.9095) Dividend 0.5420 (1.7691) Short-term -0.8332 (1.4202) Term -0.4823 Spread (1.9755) Credit 0.7433 Spread (2.2383) Dividend 0.1077 (2.3313) Short-term 0.6519 (2.4538) Term -0.6234 Spread (2.2503) Credit 0.1617 Spread (2.2858) Dividend -1.0697 (2.5892) Short-term -1.4658 (2.7956) (1) survived longer than 6 months 0.4898* (0.2911) 0.8879*** (0.0424) 0.0116 (0.0593) -0.0194 (0.0545) 1.4112 (1.8972) -2.6088 (1.9153) 0.5886 (1.7745) -0.7801 (1.4245) -0.5347 (1.9816) 0.6468 (2.2451) -0.0121 (2.3384) 0.5232 (2.4613) -0.6123 (2.2572) 0.2032 (2.2928) -1.0180 (2.5971) -1.3813 (2.8041) (2) survived longer than 12 months 0.4695 (0.2918) 0.8897*** (0.0425) 0.0122 (0.0594) -0.0197 (0.0547) 1.3952 (1.9014) -2.5877 (1.9196) 0.6165 (1.7784) -0.7930 (1.4277) -0.5602 (1.9859) 0.5435 (2.2501) -0.1161 (2.3436) 0.3918 (2.4667) -0.5716 (2.2622) 0.1385 (2.2979) -1.0128 (2.6028) -1.4155 (2.8103) (3) survived longer than 24 months 0.4872 (0.2950) 0.8986*** (0.0430) 0.0018 (0.0601) -0.0239 (0.0553) 1.3543 (1.9228) -2.6948 (1.9411) 0.6130 (1.7984) -0.9713 (1.4437) -0.7191 (2.0083) 0.4007 (2.2754) -0.1445 (2.3700) 0.1855 (2.4944) -0.5949 (2.2876) 0.2063 (2.3237) -1.0948 (2.6321) -1.3366 (2.8419) (4) survived longer than 36 months 0.4915 (0.2982) 0.9036*** (0.0434) -0.0007 (0.0607) -0.0243 (0.0558) 1.3649 (1.9430) -2.6090 (1.9616) 0.6517 (1.8173) -0.8671 (1.4589) -0.8031 (2.0294) 0.2869 (2.2993) -0.2086 (2.3949) 0.0260 (2.5207) -0.6067 (2.3117) 0.0984 (2.3482) -1.2161 (2.6598) -1.4710 (2.8718) R-squared 0.899 0.898 0.898 0.897 0.897 Note: Standard errors in parentheses.