https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2017.15.8.1 김재철가천대학교도시계획학과 Development of a Diagnosis Manual to Evaluate the Pedestrian Safety in a Neighborhood Using the Mixed Research Method Jaecheol Kim Dept. of Urban Planning, Gachon University 요약이연구는근린보행안전개선에필요한체계적진단매뉴얼을개발하고, 사례연구를통하여매뉴얼의구체적적용과정과유용성을보여주는것을주목적으로기술적 탐색적연구이다. 선행연구검토를통해개발한진단매뉴얼은간접자료를활용하는도면 / 데이터분석, 조사원에의한현장관찰, 그리고주민을대상으로하는이용자설문인터뷰의세가지조사방법을포함하는혼합연구방법을채택하고있다. 저자는서울창신동대상으로진단매뉴얼을적용한사례연구에서세가지조사방법에따른연구결과들을통합적으로분석하여대상지내위험지역과위험요인들을체계적으로도출하는과정을구체적으로기술함으로써진단매뉴얼의유용성을보여주었다. 이연구는실무적으로는계획가들에게근린보행안전성진단을위한체계적수단을제공했다는점에서, 학술적으로는여러조사방법간의차이를비교하고통합적인결론을도출하는삼각검증프로세스를실증적으로보여줬다는점에서의의를갖는다. 후속연구에서는진단매뉴얼을더많은사례들에적용하여봄으로써다양한맥락에서보다정교하게작동할수있도록개선할계획이다. 주제어 : 근린환경, 계획도구, 도시재생, 사례연구, 혼합연구방법 Abstract This study is a descriptive and exploratory one aiming to develop a systematic/diagnostic manual that is necessary for the improvement of the pedestrian safety of a neighborhood and show the practical application and usefulness of the manual through a case study. The diagnostic manual developed on the basis of the previous research review adopted a mixed research method including three investigation tools of map/data analysis using secondary data, field observation by investigators, and resident survey interview. In the case study applying the manual to Changsin-dong, Seoul, the author analyzed the results of the three investigations in integrative ways and showed the usefulness of the manual by systematically deriving the places prone to pedestrian-vehicle accidents and the influencing factors. This study contributes to the practical field in that it provides planners with a systematic tool to diagnose the pedestrian safety in the neighborhood environment while it contributes to the academic field in that it provides the concrete process that empirically compares the differences between different environmental investigative methods and deduce integrative implication from them. In a follow-up study, the author plan to apply the diagnostic manual presented in this study to more cases and improve them to work in various contexts. Key Words : Neighborhood environment, Planning tool, Urban rehabilitation, Case study, Mixed methodology Journal of Digital Convergence 1
1. 서론 2. 선행연구검토 2.1 근린환경과보행안전성 2.2 안전한근린환경조성을위한설계기법들 1) Jacobs 1995, p.273 2 Journal of Digital Convergence 2017 Aug; 15(8): 1-14
Development of a Diagnosis Manual to Evaluate the Pedestrian Safety in a Neighborhood Using the Mixed Research Method 2.3 맥락적접근을위한실무적진단도구의필요성 2.4 보행안전진단관련선행연구검토 2) Jacobs 1995, p.273 <Table 1> Pedestrian Traffic Improvement Index 3) 지속가능교통물류발전법제 37 조보행교통실태조사, 시행규칙제 9 조보행교통개선지표 Journal of Digital Convergence 3
3. 근린보행환경진단매뉴얼개발 3.1 진단매뉴얼의전제조건 3.1.1 다양한조사방법및자료의활용 3.1.2 전문가및이용자간의조화 4) Yin 2014, p.120 5) Geetzs 2000, p.75 4 Journal of Digital Convergence 2017 Aug; 15(8): 1-14
Development of a Diagnosis Manual to Evaluate the Pedestrian Safety in a Neighborhood Using the Mixed Research Method 3.1.3 대상지맥락에민감한절차적접근 3.2 표준진단매뉴얼의개발 <Table 2> Pros and cons of the investigative methods 3.2.1 도면 / 데이터분석 6) Lynch and Hack 1984, pp.80-105 7) Lynch and Hack 1984, p.81 Journal of Digital Convergence 5
3.2.2 현장관찰 3.2.3 이용자설문인터뷰 8) Lynch and Hack 1984, p.83 9) Yin 2014, p.114 3.2.4 삼각검증 4. 사례연구 : 진단매뉴얼의보정및적용 10) Lynch and Hack 1984, p.91 6 Journal of Digital Convergence 2017 Aug; 15(8): 1-14
Development of a Diagnosis Manual to Evaluate the Pedestrian Safety in a Neighborhood Using the Mixed Research Method 4.1 대상지선정 <Table 3> Items of investigation for map/data analysis [Fig. 1] Site for the case study (Source: http://map.daum.net/) 4.2 대상지여건을고려한표준진단매뉴얼의 보정및적용 4.2.1 도면 / 데이터분석 4.2.2 현장관찰 Journal of Digital Convergence 7
<Table 4> Street classification & Investigation route 22 21 <Table 5> Items of investigation for field observation 4.2.3 이용자설문인터뷰 <Table 6> Items for resident survey interview 11) 본설문에앞서피설문자에게대상지내에거주하는지, 대상지를그의동네로인식하는지묻고그렇다고응답한경우에만설문에포함하였다. 12) 성별 : 남성 41%, 여성 59% / 연령별 : 20 대이하 13%, 30 대 8 Journal of Digital Convergence 2017 Aug; 15(8): 1-14
Development of a Diagnosis Manual to Evaluate the Pedestrian Safety in a Neighborhood Using the Mixed Research Method 4.3 진단매뉴얼에따른대상지분석 4.3.1 도면 / 데이터분석 [Fig. 3] Pedestrian-vehicle accident locations (Source: http://taas.koroad.or.kr) [Fig. 2] Public transit system(a) and road characteristics(b) 4.3.2 현장관찰 8%, 40 대 23%, 50 대 28%, 60 대이상 28% [Fig. 4] Pedestrian(a) and vehicular traffic(b) Journal of Digital Convergence 9
[Fig. 5] Interactions between pedestrians and vehicles(a) and Perceived vehicle speeds(b) [Fig. 6] Investigators evaluation for the pedestrian safety of the neighborhood 4.3.3 이용자설문인터뷰 [Fig. 7] Residents evaluation for the pedestrian safety of the neighborhood 10 Journal of Digital Convergence 2017 Aug; 15(8): 1-14
Development of a Diagnosis Manual to Evaluate the Pedestrian Safety in a Neighborhood Using the Mixed Research Method [Fig. 9] Comparison and triangulation of investigators and residents evaluations [Fig. 8] Resident survey: places prone to pedestrianvehicle accidents 4.3.4 삼각검증을통한시사점도출 Journal of Digital Convergence 11
5. 결론 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES 12 Journal of Digital Convergence 2017 Aug; 15(8): 1-14
Development of a Diagnosis Manual to Evaluate the Pedestrian Safety in a Neighborhood Using the Mixed Research Method Journal of Digital Convergence 13
김재철 (Kim, Jaecheol) 14 Journal of Digital Convergence 2017 Aug; 15(8): 1-14