Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: : C An Exploration

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: : C An Exploration"

희지 김
4 years ago
Views:

1 Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: : C An Exploration of the Processes of Deriving a School Community s Vision: A Focus on C middle school s case Purpose: The primary purpose of the study was to offer suggestions to schools seeking innovations by undertaking an in-depth exploration of C middle school s case that implemented a series of democratic processes for the purpose of deriving school community s shared vision based upon collective opinions of teachers, students and parents. Methods: The research methodology was designed on the basis of the analyses of relevant studies on domestic and overseas cases to the topic of this study and the questionnaire, which was used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, was also created as a result of implementation of literature review. The questionnaire was administered to teachers, students, and parents three times in order to gather their opinions. The data collected was then analyzed in terms of descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results: It was found that the C middle school s core values were empathy, challenging spirit, collaboration, health, and joy. These core values helped to clarify and establish the desirable characteristics of students, teachers, and parents. Then, the school vision was subsequently derived. Discussion and Conclusion: This study is expected not only to disseminate information conducive to schools that try to carry out the study of the same kind but to lead the school members to have positive perspectives on the school community s vision. Key words : School Innovation, Community of school, Vision, Deriving School Vision Corresponding Author: Lee, Eun-Sang. Changdeok Girls Middle Schhol, Seoul, Korea, eslee15@changdeok.ms.kr

2 .,.,. (Elmore, 2004; Evans, 1996; Fullan & Hargreaves, 2006). (Hall & Hord, 2006)., (, 2009;, 2005;, 2009;, 2002)...., (Sims & Lorenzi, 1992)..,, (,,,,, 2007;, 2003).... (, 2014), (,,, 2016), (,, 2017;,,, 2016).,. C. C..

3 .. (Rice, O Conner, Peters, & Morone, 1998). (Kristof, 1996)..,.,, (Thoms & Greenberger, 1995).. Jim William(1995),,.,.,.,... Barth(1989).,.,.,. (, 2009;, 2005;, 2009;, 2002).,.,...

4 (Sergiovanni, 1994)..,,, (,,, 2015;, 2014).,.. Etzioni(1996).,.,,, (,, 2017). (2015),.,., (Sims & Lorenzi, 1992).,,., (, 2003). (,,,,, 2007)., (,, 2017).. (,,,, 2015).,.. (Barth, 1989)..

5 .,... < -1>.,..,.,,,,,..,..,,,,.,.,.,,..,.,,.,,,.

6 : :,,,,,,,, : :,,,, : : :,, : / / / / : ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ) : : : : : : : 21 : :,, :,, :,, :,, :,,, :,, :,,, :, :,, 1).

7 .. - (Jim & Collins, 1995),,.,,.. - C. --(,, ).,..,. < -1>.,...

8 C. C 2015.,,. C. C,,. 3, < -1>. 1 (2017.3~5), 1,

9 ( ) (2017.6) 2 (2017.9) 3 ( ~11) ( ),, -: 143 (72%), : 17 (61%), 83 (42%) -, () - (12 ) 1 2 -,, - 2) - 17, 15, , 15, 15 3 (Peer Debriefing) (Peer Debriefing) (Peer Debriefing) (member check),, ,,. 2 1, (). 2 1 Likert 5., ) (Coefficient of Variance). 0.5 (, 2006).

10 . 3 (,, ). (Peer Debriefing) (member check).. 1..,,..,,,,., , 17, 83,, 72%, 61%, 42%. 1) 단어빈도수조사 1.,.,. 7 < -1>

11 ( ) ) 응답유목화.,. < -2> , ()

12 교육혁신연구, 제28권 제4호 2. 2차 설문조사 차 설문조사 결과를 토대로 비전, 가치, 구성원상(학생상, 교사상, 학부모상)이 모두 연결된 흐름을 가질 필요가 있다고 판단했다. 1차 설문조사에서 연구참여자들은 비전, 가치, 구성원상을 각각 독립적으로 기술한다기 보다는 유사한 의견을 반복적으로 제시하고 있었다. 이는 문헌 및 사례 분석에서 지적한 바와 일치한다. 따라서 2차 설문도구는 1차 설문조사에서 도출한 주요 가 치를 중심으로 제작되었다. 2차 설문조사 참여자는 1차 설문조사에서 지속적인 연구 참여에 동 의한 구성원들을 대상으로 하였다. 교직원 17명, 학생, 학부모는 각각 15명이었다. 1 1) 설문도구 구성 차 설문도구는 핵심가치를 중심으로 구성되었다. 1차 설문에서 응답한 결과로부터 빈도수가 높게 나타난 가치와 빈도수가 낮더라도 여러 단어에 그 의미가 분산되어있다고 판단한 가치를 12개 선별하였다. 선별된 핵심가치는 자유, 창의, 본질, 도전, 협력, 실천, 건강, 공감, 끈기, 즐거 움, 탐구, 정의 등이었다. 각 가치에 대한 설명은 비전과 구성원상에 나타난 응답자들의 서술을 참고해서 작성하였다. 설문도구는 <그림 Ⅳ-1>과 같이 구성하였는데, 한 단어로 표현된 12개의 가치를 설명하고, 학생상, 교사상, 학부모상으로 얼마나 적합하다고 생각하는지에 대해 5점 척도로 응답한 후 우 선순위를 5위까지 표시하도록 하였다. 또한, 해당 단어의 설명에 대해 수정 의견을 물었고, 설문 의 마지막에는 12개의 가치 이외에 필요하다고 생각하는 핵심가치를 추가적으로 작성하도록 하 였다. 2 <그림 Ⅳ-1> 2차 설문도구 2) 설문결과 우선 5점 척도의 응답에서 응답자별로 학생상, 교사상, 학부모상에 포함되어야 할 핵심가치의

13 , 5 1, < -3>,,. 0.1~0.3., 5. 2,.,,,,,,,,,.,,,, , 1 1, , 5.

14 7, 5.,.,.. 3:1:1, < -4>., 5., 2, 4, 5. 1, 2 4.,, ,,,,, 5..,,,,,,,,,,. 2. 1,., 3. 1) 설문도구구성 3 2 5,

15 , 3,,.,. 2,, 3. 2) 설문결과 3 < -5>. [] [] [] [ ] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3..

16 ,.. C,. < -2>.

17 . (Hall & Hord, 2006),.. C. C,,,.,,,,,,,. C.,..,,.,. C C. 5,, 3,., C.,.,....,...,,..,.

18 ..,..,.., ---( ).,,,. -. (),,..,, (,, ).,.,,....,.,,. (,,, 2017), (,,, 2013), (,,, 2018)..,.

19 .,.. (2009).. (2), (2014).. (3), ,, (2013).. (3), (2005). :. (2), 3-29.,,,, (2007). :. (2), (2006). :., (2017).,. (8), ,, (2014).. (4), (2014) (2003). :.,, (2016).. (2), ,,, (2015).. (1), 1-20.,, (2016).. (1), ,, (2017).. (1), (2009).. (1), (2002)

20 ,, (2018).. (1), ,,,,, (2015).. (4), Barth, R. S. (1989). The principal and profession of teaching. In T.J. Sergiovanni & J.H. Moore(Eds.). Schooling for tomorrow: Directing reforms to issues that count(pp ). Needham Heights, Mass.: Allyn & Bacon. Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside-out. Cambridge: Harvard university press. Etzioni, A. (1996). A moderate communitarian proposal. Political Theory, 24(2), Evans, R. (1996). The human side of school change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Fullan, M., & Hargreves, A. (2006). What's worth fighting for in your school. Teachers College press., (2006). :. Hall, G. E., & Hord, M. S. (2006). Implement Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes (2nd ed.).,,,,,,, (2011). :. Jim, C. C., & William C. L. (1995). Beyond entrepreneurship. Prentice Hall Press., (2004). :. Kristof, A. L. (1996), Person-Organization Fit: an Intergrative Review of its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), Rice, M., O Conner. G., Peters. L., & Morone, J. (1998). Managing Discontinuous Innovation. Research Technology Management, 41(3), Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Organizations or communities?: Changing the metaphor changes the theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(2), Sims Jr, H. P., & Lorenzi, P. (1992). The New Leadership Paradigm: Social Learning and Cognition in Organizations. London: Sage Publications, Inc.. Thoms, P., & Greenberger, D. B. (1995), Training Business Leaders to Create Positive Organizational Visions of the Future: Is it Successful?. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995(1), : / : / :

21 : C :. :,. 3,. : C,,,,, (,, ).. :.

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.423-441 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.29.1.201903.423 An Exploratory Study on the Improvement of Democratic Consultative Culture