DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Similar documents
DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


03-서연옥.hwp

Lumbar spine

부산대구광주울산경기도충청북도전라북도경상북도인천대전세종강원도충청남도전라남도경상남도제주도서울

03이경미(237~248)ok

hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

10(3)-02.fm

歯1.PDF

서론 34 2

untitled


264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H



Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

433대지05박창용

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

012임수진

,......

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

인문사회과학기술융합학회

03-2ƯÁý -14š

2011ÄÁº¥³»Áö3

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<28BCF6BDC D B0E6B1E2B5B520C1F6BFAABAB020BFA9BCBAC0CFC0DAB8AE20C1A4C3A520C3DFC1F8C0FCB7AB5FC3D6C1BE E E687770>

歯14.양돈규.hwp

2008ÄÁº¥¼ÇÃÖÁ¾

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

학술원논문집 ( 자연과학편 ) 제 50 집 2 호 (2011) 콩의식품적의의및생산수급과식용콩의자급향상 李弘䄷 * 李英豪 ** 李錫河 *** * Significance of Soybean as Food and Strategies for Self Suffici

09김정식.PDF

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Nov.; 26(11),

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

02신현화

<B1B9C1A6B0B3B9DFC7F9B7C25FC3B9B0C9C0BD5FB3BBC1F62E706466>

03권동희(17-26)ok

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe


?

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc


<31332E28C7B0C1BE29B9E8BCAEBAB92E687770>

1..

14 경영관리연구 제6권 제1호 ( ) Ⅰ. 서론 2013년 1월 11일 미국의 유명한 경영전문 월간지 패스트 컴퍼니 가 2013년 글로벌 혁신 기업 50 을 발표했다. 가장 눈에 띄는 것은 2년 연속 혁신기업 1위를 차지했던 애플의 추락 이었다. 음성 인식

PJTROHMPCJPS.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

국내 디지털콘텐츠산업의 Global화 전략

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

10(3)-09.fm

<353420B1C7B9CCB6F52DC1F5B0ADC7F6BDC7C0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120BEC6B5BFB1B3C0B0C7C1B7CEB1D7B7A52E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

¿¬°¨ÃÖÁ¾Àμ⺻-last

¨ë Áö¸®ÇÐȸÁö-¼Û°æ¾ðOK

슬라이드 1

정진명 남재원 떠오르고 있다. 배달앱서비스는 소비자가 배달 앱서비스를 이용하여 배달음식점을 찾고 음식 을 주문하며, 대금을 결제까지 할 수 있는 서비 스를 말한다. 배달앱서비스는 간편한 음식 주문 과 바로결제 서비스를 바탕으로 전 연령층에서 빠르게 보급되고 있는 반면,

공연영상


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

43-4대지07한주성ok

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<B9AEC8ADB0E6C1A6BFACB1B820C1A63137B1C720C1A633C8A C2F720BCF6C1A4BABB292E687770>

09-감마선(dh)

04김호걸(39~50)ok

605.fm

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

1. KT 올레스퀘어 미디어파사드 콘텐츠 개발.hwp

Development of culture technic for practical cultivation under structure in Gastrodia elate Blume

Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

09È«¼®¿µ 5~152s

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 19~41 석유제품브랜드의자산가치측정 : 휘발유를 중심으로 19

09구자용(489~500)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

12.077~081(A12_이종국).fm

요 약 대한민국은 1948년 정부수립 이후 60년 만에 세계 13위의 경제대국으로 비약적인 성 장을 이루었다. 정부수립 2년 만에 북한의 전격 남침으로 전 국토가 초토화되었고, 휴 전 이후에도 안보에 대한 위협은 계속되었다. 그러나 대한민국 국민은 불리한 여건에 좌절하

목 차 회사현황 1. 회사개요 2. 회사연혁 3. 회사업무영역/업무현황 4. 등록면허보유현황 5. 상훈현황 6. 기술자보유현황 7. 시스템보유현황 주요기술자별 약력 1. 대표이사 2. 임원짂 조직 및 용도별 수행실적 1. 조직 2. 용도별 수행실적

제 출 문 경상북도 경산시 농업기술센터 귀하 본 보고서를 6차산업수익모델시범사업 농산물가공품개발 연구용역 과제의 최종보고서로 제출합니다 년 11 월 19 일 주관연구기관명 : 영남대학교 총괄연구책임자 : 한 기 동 연 구 원 : 김 상 욱 이 수 형 이 상

<C7D1B1B9B1A4B0EDC8ABBAB8C7D0BAB85F31302D31C8A35F32C2F75F E687770>

???? 1

31(3B)-07(7055).fm

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

Transcription:

Current Status of Honeybee Production for Pollination Service in 2013 Kyeong Yong Lee, Seung Geu Lee 1, Young Bo Lee, Nam Jung Kim, Jung Hwa Kim 1, Yong Soo Choi, Pil Don Kang and Hyung Joo Yoon* Department of Agricultural Biology, The National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA, Wanju, 565-851, Republic of Korea 1 R&D Extension Division, Extension Service Bureau, RDA, Jeonju, 560-500, Republic of Korea (Received 3 October 2014; Revised 23 October 2014; Accepted 2 November 2014) Abstract Recently, the importance of insect pollinators is a significant and growing for efficient pollination of the crop. We surveyed current status of production of honeybee for pollination service in 2013. Total 2,224 beekeepers produce 216,846 honeybee colonies for pollination in 2013 survey. This account 13.2% of beekeepers and 12.1% of honeybee colony in Korea. In the province-wise, Gyeongbuk was number one with 898 beekeepers (20.0%) and 74,180 colonies (17.2%), followed by Chungnam (16.3%, 14.8%), Gyeongnam (15.4%,16.0%), and Jeonnam (15.0%, 10.0%). The Annual gross income of honeybee pollination service was 23.1 billion won (USD 21.7million) and was 5.8% of total gross income of beekeeping with 378.3 billion won (USD 355 million). Among 7 gross income category of beekeeping industry, honey was the highest with 67.4%, followed by bee venom with 17.3% and then pollination service. The rental price and sale price of colony for pollination service were 82,892 2,819 won (USD 77.8) and 130,586 4,118 won (USD 122.6). The ratio rental to sale was 0.65. In survey that asked the beekeeping income of beekeeper producing pollination colony, honey was higher with 67.4% followed by pollination service with 23.4%. Most beekeeper expressed a positive intention as 92.8% in produce and providing colonies for pollination service. Key words: Current status, Honeybee pollination, Pollination service, Pollination colony (Free, 1970). 65%,, (Pollinator) (Barth, 1985). *Corresponding author. E-mail: yoonhj1023@korea.kr 245

246 2 (Lebuhn et al., 2013), 300 84% (Richards, 1993)., 80~85% (Free, 1970; Delaplane and Mayer, 2000; Klein et al., 2003). 90% (Allsopp et al., 2008). 146 (Morse and Calderone, 2000), 189, 143 (Levin, 1983). 150 43 (Potts, 2004). 35, 17 (RIRDC, 2010). Jung(2008) 5.9, 1 18., Seo et al.(2011) 7,559, 1,838., 19, 99% (Yoon et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2013).,, (Kim et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2008; Kim and Jung 2013; Ahn et al., 2013), (Lee et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2010),., (Lee et al., 2007; Yoon et al., 2008; Yoon et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2012; Yoon et al., 2013).,.,,,,,,,,,,. 2012 (2012, MAFRI),,. 2013, (RDA, 2014). ( ), ( ) (RDA, 2014). 2014 3 3 3 14 8, 1, 8 158.. 2013 12,,,,.

.,,,. Chi-square test.,,.. 2014 3 2 2014 6 2 3 2013 12. (purposive sampling) 42 95.,.,,,,,,,,,,,,., 1 2,000, 2,000. PASW 18 (IBM Inc., 2009) One-way(welch s) ANOVA test, T- test, (Correlation Analysis), (Frequencies Analyze) (Multiple response analyze). One-way ANOVA test,,, Tukey HSD Duncun method. T- test. 40%,,. 158 2013 (Table 2), 2,244, 216,846. 2013 12 16,877 1,795,527 13.2%, 12.1% (RDA, 2014)., 10% 20 (Koapis, 2007), 2007 8.4%. (Table 2), 898 40%, 375 (16.7%), 244 (10.9%). 74,180 (34.2%), 36,060 (16.6%), 32,970 (15.2%). 23 (1%) 1,690 (0.8%),. (Table 2), 11.7 1.5%, 20.0 5.2%. 16.3 5.8%, 15.4 4.5%, 15.0 4.1% 247

248 Table 1. The number of beekeepers providing pollination service in survey of producing honeybee colonies for pollination in 2013 Province Surveyed city or county Number of counties Bee keepers Suwon (2), Namyangju (3), Anseong (1), Gyeonggi-do Yangpkeong (3), Hwaseong (1), Gwangju (1), 8 17 Icheon (3), Yangju (3) Gangwon-do - 0 0 Chungju (3), Jwcheon (1), Jincheon (1), Chungcheongbuk-do Cheongwon (3), Okcheon (1), Goesan (1), 9 17 Eumseong (3), Danyang (2), Boeun (2) Chungcheongnam-do Seocheon (3), Hongseong (3), Taean (3), Dangjin (3) 4 12 Jeollabuk-do Iksan (1) 1 1 Jeollanam-do Boseong (3), Jangheung (-), Yeongwang (3), Hwasun (1), Gokseong (3) 5 10 Sangju (1), Gumi (2), Yeongju (1), Gyeongsangbuk-do Chwongsong (3), Goryeong (3), Chilgok (3), 8 19 Yecheon (3), Seongju (3) Gyeongsangnam-do Gimhae (5), Haman (3), Changnyeong (3), Goseong (2) 4 13 Jeju-do - 0 0 1) Metropolitans Daegu (3), Incheon (2), Daejeon (1) 3 6 Total 42 95 1) Metropolitans is included following cities: Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, Incheon, Daejeon, Ulsan, Sejong. Table 2. Current beekeeper, colonies and rate of beekeepers and colonies for crop pollination in 2013 Province No. of beekeepers No. of colonies Colonies/ beekeepers Honeybee for crop pollination No. of beekeepers No. of colonies Rate of beekeepers Rate of colonies for for pollination pollination (%) (%) Gyeonggi-do 1,287 133,332 104.4 30.2 ab 65 8,416 8.3 3.9 ab 6.1 2.0 abc Gangwon-do 992 99,569 93.5 43.4 ab 23 1,690 2.8 1.5 b 1.6 0.8 c Chungcheongbuk-do 1,633 173,660 310.6 98.9 a 46 19,260 3.3 1.4 b 8.3 2.8 abc Chungcheongnam-do 1,328 167,801 135.4 53.8 ab 244 32,970 16.3 5.8 ab 14.8 5.4 ab Jeollabuk-do 1,109 173,369 74.7 27.3 b 86 5,605 7.5 2.7 ab 5.2 1.9 bc Jeollanam-do 1,860 165,049 67.3 14.9 b 243 14,240 15.0 4.1 ab 10.1 3.5 abc Gyeongsangbuk-do 4,629 398,730 155.5 40.2 ab 898 74,180 20.0 5.2 a 17.2 3.6 a Gyeongsangnam-do 2,234 239,065 175.3 39.6 ab 375 36,060 15.4 4.5 ab 16.0 3.4 ab Jeju-do 397 61,969 1) Metropolitans 1,408 182,715 66.5 18.5 b 264 24,425 13.9 6.1 ab 9.3 4.9 abc Total 16,877 1,795,259 133.9 16.1 2,244 216,846 11.7 1.5 10.0 1.2 1) Metropolitans is included following cities: Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, Incheon, Daejeon, Ulsan, Sejong. 2) The rate of beekeepers, colonies and colonies per beekeepers for pollination service are significantly different among province and metropolitans (Oneway ANOVA test, p<0.05).. Table 2. 10.0 1.2%, 17.2 3.6%., 16.0 3.4%, 14.8 5.4%. 2.8 1.5%, 1.6 0.8%,.

A Royaljelly 109 Propolis 2.7% 160 4.0% Pollen 99 2.5% Beeswax 14 0.3% B Royaljelly 955 3.1% Bee venom, 474 1.6% Pollination 231 5.8% Vee venom, 69 17.3% Annual gross income of beekeeping n=158 (100 million won) Honey 2,707 67.4% Beeswax 2,741 9.0% Pollen 2,917 9.5% Pollination service 2,244 7.3% No. of beekeepers selling bee products and pollination service n=30, 573 Propolis 5,730 18.7% Honey 15,512 50.7% Fig. 1. Annual gross income of beekeeping (A) and number of beekeepers selling bee products and pollination service (B) (Welch s ANOVA test:, F=3.385, df=8,55.071, p=0.003;, F=5.351, df=8,52.189, p=0.000). 27.4%, 22.2% 8 (RDA, 2014), (81.2%) (17.8%) (Yoon et al., 2013; Statistics Korea, 2013)., (99.9%) (45.8%) (Yoon et al., 2013; Statistics Korea, 2013). 40%,,, (Correlation analysis: r=0.913),. 94 133.9 16.1. (310.6 98.9 ), 2.3 (Table 2).,,,,,,. (One-way ANOVA F=2.365, df=8,85, p=0.024). 231. (7, 3,783 ) 5.8%, (67.4%, 2,707 ) (17.3%, 694 ) (5.8%, 231 ) (Fig. 1A). 15,512 50.8% (18.7%, 5730 ), (9.5%, 2917 ), (9.0%, 2,741 ), 7.3% (Fig. 1B).,,, 8.5%..,,,,,. 94 Table 3. 130,586 249

Table 3. Current state of production and marketing of honeybees as pollinator for crop pollination in 2013 250 Province Beekeepers Gyeonggi-do 65 147,344 7,241 a 91,250 7,388 68.4 3.7 Gangwon-do 23 119,250 14,738 b Chungcheongbuk-do 46 142,222.2 360 ab 82,778 4,006 58.5 3.3 Chungcheongnam-do 244 101,818 9,635 b 70,000 10,110 60.8 7.9 Jeollabuk-do 86 152,857 34,206 a 77,142 7,468 56.1 10.2 Jeollanam-do 243 140,000 8,548 ab 79,000 9,481 52.3 7.0 Gyeongsangbuk-do 898 133,125 6,239 ab 89,166 7,004 71.6 6.2 Gyeongsangnam-do 375 118,000 4,899 ab 85,909 5,909 75.4 5.7 Jeju-do 1) Metropolitans 264 113,333 19,734 b 82,000 11,135 67.6 11.9 Total 2,244 130,586 4,118 82,891 2,819 64.5 2.5 1) Metropolitans is included following cities: Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, Incheon, Daejeon, Ulsan, Sejong 2) The Average sale price is significantly different among province and metropolitans (One-way ANOVA test, p<0.05) 4,118, 82,892 2,819. 152,857 34,206, 147,344 7,241 12~17%.,, 13 14 (Table 3).,,, 9% 23%. (One-way ANOVA F=2.047, df=8,77, p=0.05)., 10% 91,250 7,388.,, 82,000. 5~16%,. 64.5 2.5% (Table 3)., 11% 75.4 5.7%.,,, 4~7%. 2008 Sale Average price Rental The ratio of rental to sale (%) 91,354 16,932 (Yoon et al., 2011), 2010 80,937 51,675 (Yoon et al., 2012), 107,162 40,396 10,000~20,000,.,,, (Yoon et al., 2013),.,. 95 (Table 1), 342.5 92.0 (Fig. 2). 200 70.5% 100 37.6%, 100-199 32.9%, 1,000 7%., 88.2%

300-399 colonies 4.7% 500-999 colonies 3.5% 400-499 colonies 4.7% 1000-3000 colonies 3.5% 200-299 colonies 9.4% No. of colonies providing pollination service n=95 100-200 colonies 32.9% More than 3000 colonies 3.5% Below 100 colonies 37.6% Fig. 2. The number of colonies providing crop pollination service., 11.8% (Fig. 3A). (120 ) 48.7%, 21.8%, 16.8%, 6.7%, 2.5%.,,, (Fig. 3B). (17 ), 41.2%, 17.6%, 11.8%,,, 5.9% (Fig. 3C). 2011, 43.3%(14,749 ), 25.8%(8,801 ), 17.2%(5,869 ), 8.6%(2,932 ), 4.5%(1,532 ), (Fig. 3B)(Yoon et al., 2013). 34.1%(3,932 ), 31.9%(3,675 ), 17.9%(2,056 ), 5.6%, 4.3%, 2.9%, 2.3% (Yoon et al., 2013). 17., 59%, 50%, 65% (Fig. 4).,. 2009 49.4%, 46.8% (Yoon et al., 2011). (87 ), 54.3%, 45.7% 10% (Fig. 5A). Fig. 5B., 4 32.2%, 3 30.5% 67.7% 3~4 Fruits 11.8% Crop provided pollination service n=137 Vegetables 88.2% Melon 2.5% Oriental melon 16.8% Pumkin 0.8% Vegetables Crop provided pollination service n=120 Strawberry 48.7% Rasberry 5.9% Cherry 5.9% Blueberry 5.9% Peach 11.8% Fig. 3. The rate of crop (A), vegetable crop (B) and fruit crop (C) provided colonies for pollination service in 2013. Pepper 6.7% Daicon 0.8% Eggplant 0.8% A B C Chinese cabbage 0.8% Fruit tree crop provided pollination service n=17 Sweet persimmon 11.8% Water melon 21.8% Pear 17.6% Apple 41.2% 251

252 Ratio of sale to rental (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0.0 40.7 59.3 Oriental melon Fig. 4. The providing ratio of sale between rental in 3 vegetable crops in 2013. There is statistically no significant difference in the ratio of sale to rental among 3 vegetable crops (Oneway ANOVA, p>0.05).. 5 20.3%. 2 10.2%, 3, 4 3.4%. 93.2% (Fig. 5B). 2009 4.8 0.1 4~5 60.7%.,,. 2,000 80.9% (Yoon et al., 2011). 49.7 50.3 Strawberry Vegetable crops Rental Sale 65.0 35.0 Water melon, 57.5%, 31.0% 11.5% (Fig. 5C). 88.5%,, (RDA, 2009).., 58.4%, 37.7%, 3.9% (Fig. 6A).,,. 225 93.9%, 1~2 54.3%, 3~4 39.0%, (Fig. 6B). 92 (Fig. 7A), 1 Providing method n=87 3 combs, weak 3.4% 5 combs, strong 20.3% 2 combs, strong 10.2% 4 combs, weak 3.4% A B C Rental 45.7% Sale 54.3% Colony strength n=92 4 combs, strong 32.2% In the province 31.0% Out of the province 11.5% Seles area n=113 In the City country and district 57.5% 3 combs, strong 30.5% Fig. 5. The providing method (A), colony strength (B) and sales (C) of colonies for crop pollination service in 2013.

A Plastic 3.9% B No care 7.1% 3 times/month 14.2% 1 time/month 27.6% Wood 37.7% Structure of beehive n=154 Styrofoam 58.4% Over 4 times/month 24.4% Colony care after sale n=225 2 times/month 26.7% Fig. 6. The structure of beehive (A) and colony care after sale (B) for pollination service, 2013. 32.6%, 23.4%, 17.7%, 13.2%, 8.0%, 3.2%, 1.9%. 10~20 29.7%, 10% 23.1%, 20~30% 17.6%, 40% 17.6%, 30~40% 12.1% 10~40% 59.4% (Fig. 7B).,., 5.8%,, 5~20%.. (Fig. 8A), 104 65.4%. (28.8%), (15.4%), (10.6%). 35.6%,. (Fig. 8B), 69.6%, 12%. 24.1%, 20.0%, 19.9%, 18.1%, 14.9%, 3.1% (Fig. 8C).,,. Choi(1987) 94.4%, Kim and Jung(2013) 2011 3, 72%. 40% (Choi and Lee, 1986), 34% (Jung and Kim, 2013). 2011 67.9% (Yoon et al., 2013),.,, 253

254 A Saleing colonies 13.2% Propolis 17.7% Contribution apiculture income n=92 Pollination 23.4% Honey 32.6% More than 40% 17.6% Pollination total income n=92 Fig. 7. Distribution of annual income of beekeepers who provide pollination service (A) and the proportion of income from pollination service (B). Education experience and institution n=104 Bee venom 3.2% Royaljelly 8.0% Etc. 1.9% Satisfaction degree n=92 B 20-30% 17.6% 30-40% 12.1% Beekeeper cooperative union Very low Very high 1.1% A 2.9% B 3.3% C Beekeeper society 10.6% Agricultural Extension Agencies 15.4% Universty 7.7% Beekeeping association 28.8% Inexperience 34.6% Low 15.2% High 10.9% Medium 69.6% Manual of honeybee pollination 18.1% Below 10% 23.1% Production of colony for pollination 14.9% 10-20% 29.7% Etc.3.1% Problem of colony production n=95 Education shortage 19.9% Pesticide damege 24.1% Sales route 20.0% Fig. 8. The education experience of production of colony (A), the satisfaction degree of production of colony (B) and the problem of colony production (C) for pollination service, 2013. 95 (Fig. 9A), 74.7% (Chi-square test: x 2 =46.449, df=4, p=0.0001), 97 (Fig. 9B), 92.8% (Chi-square test: x 2 =61.733, df=3, p=0.0001).,,.,,,,.,,,.., 2013 2,244, 216,846.

A B Very unnecessary 2.1% Reduce 7.2% Unnecessary 11.6% Maintain 46.4% Plan for provide of pollination colony n=95 Increase 46.4% Maintain 11.6% Necessity for research of pollination colony n=95 Very Unecessary 38.9% Necessary 35.8% Fig. 9. The future plan for pollination business (A) and the need of pollination research. 13.2% 12.1%., 898 (20.0%), 74,180 (17.2%), (16.3%, 14.8%), (15.4%, 16.0%), (15.0%, 10.1%). 231. 5.8% (67.4%) (17.3%). 82,892 2,819, 130,586 4,118 65%., 32.6%, 23.4%. 92.8%. ( : PJ01001002). Ahn, K.S., C.M., Yoon, K.H. Kim, S.Y. Nam, M.G. Oh and G.H. Kim. 2013. Evaluation of acute and residual toxicity of insecticides registered on strawberry against honeybee (Apis mellifera). Korean J. Pestic Sci. 17(3): 185-192. Allsopp, M.H., W.J. De Lange and R. Veldtman. 2008. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PLos Biol. 3: 1-8. Barth, F.G. 1985. Insects and flowers. The Biology of a Partnerships. Georgte Allen and Unwin. pp. 293. Betty, J.N. 2009. Honeybees: market for pollination dervices grows. Region Focus. 2009: 20-21. Choi, S.Y. 1987. Questionnaire survey on the pesticide injury of mellifera honey bees. Korean J. Apic. 2: 29-47. Choi, S.Y. and M.L. Lee. 1986. A questionary survey on the injury to honey bees by pesticide poisonings in Korea. Korean J. Apic. 1: 76-89. Delaplane, K.S and D.F. Mayer. 2000. Crop pollination by bees. CABI Publishing. New York. Free, J.B. 1970. Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press. New York. pp. 684. IBM PASW Statistics 18.0. 2009. PASW Core System User s Guide, IBM inc. USA. Jung, C. 2008. Economic value of honeybee pollination on major fruit and vegetable crops in Korea. Korean J. Apic. 23(2): 147-152. Kim, B.S., Y.K. Park, Y.H. Lee, M.H. Jeong, A.S. You, Y.J. Yang, J.B. Kim, O.K. Kwon and Y.J. Ahn. 2008. Honeybee acute and residual toxicity of pesticides registered for strawberry. Korean J. Pestic Sci. 12: 229-235. Kim, D.W. and C.E. Jung. 2013. Comparative analysis of the perception on honeybee damage by the pesticides between beekeepers and apple growers. Korean J. Apic. 28(1): 33-38. Korapis. 2007. Korean Beekeeping Association Hompage. http://korapis.or.kr. Lebuhn, G., S. Droege, E.F. Connor, B. Gemmill-Herren, S.G. Potts, R.L. Minckley, T. Griswold, R. Jean, E. Kula, D.W. Roubik, J.H. Cane, K.W. Wright, G. Frankie and F. Parker. 2013. Detecting insect pollinator declines on 255

256 regional and global scales. Con. Biolo. 27(1): 113-120. Lee, M.L., K.H. Choi, S.W. Lee and J.B. Kim. 2008. Physical symptoms of honeybees, Apis mellifera L., after contact with residual acephate on apple trees. Korean J. Apic. 23: 235-239. Lee, S.B., H.J. Yoon, I.K. Park, Y.S. Kim, M.Y. Lee and M.L. Lee. 2006. Comparion on the pollinating activities of bumblebee, Bombus terrestris L. and honeybee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera : Apidae) in the strawberry house. Korean J. Apic 21: 125-130. Lee, S.B., Y.S. Kim, M.L. Lee, M.Y. Lee and H.J. Yoon. 2006. The foraging activity and the effect of honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the watermelon houses. Korean J. Apic. 21(1): 49-54. Lee, S.B., K.Y. Lee, N.G. Ha, H.J. Yoon, I.G. Park, S.J. Hwang and H.S. Gang. 2007. The status of the pollinator uses on major economical crops in Korea. Korean J. Apic. 22(1): 79-86. Lee, S.B., H.S. Sim, W.T. Kim, K.H. Park, S.J. Hwang and Y.C. Choi. 2010. Characteristics of pollinating activities by Bombus terrestris worker, drone and Apis mellifera worker at the oriental melon houses. Korean J. Apic. 25(4): 245-252. Levin, M.D. 1983. Value of bee pollination to U.S. Bull. Entomol Soc Am. 29(4): 50-51. Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA). 2012. Domestic animals statistics. 54-57pp. MAFRA Press, Sejong, Korea. Morse, R.A. and N.W. Calderone. 2000. The value of honey bees as pollinators of US crops in 2000. Bee Culture. 128:1-15 Potts, S.G. 2004. European pollinator initiative: assessing the risks of pollinator loss. in: solitary bees and their role in pollination. (eds. B. Freitas and V. Fonseca). Proceedings of the International Workshop on solitary bees and their role in pollination pp. 43-55, Fortaleza, Brazil Richards, K.W. 1993. Non-Apis bees as crop pollinators. Rev. Suisse Zoo.l 100: 807-822. Roger, A.M., W.C. Nicholas. 2000. The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. Crops in 2000. Bee Culturw. 128: special pullout supplement. Rural Development Administration (RDA). 2009. Current status of pollinators use for tomato. 89-100pp. RDA Press, Jeonju, Korea. Rural Development Administration (RDA). 2014. The current status of apiculture in 2013. 1-4pp. RDA Official paper. Jeonju, Korea. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC). 2010. Pollination aware: the real value of pollination in australia. RIRDC Pub. 2010: 10-81. Seo, D.K., S.B. Lee, S.Y. Lee, S.H. Park, D.S. Kim, W.T. Kim, K.H. Park and Y.C. Choi. 2011. An economic analysis of pollinator s activities on the production of major fruit trees in Korea. Korean J. Apic. 26(4): 331-340. Statistics Korea. 2013. Crops production statistics, http://kosis.kr. Yoon, H.J., K.Y. Lee, S.B. Lee, I.G. Park, S.J. Jang, Y.C. Choi, Y.S. Choi and G.G Lee. 2008. Research on the current status of insect pollinator use in Korea. Korean J. Apic 23: 295-304. Yoon, H.J., K.Y. Lee, M.I. Kim, I.G. Park and Y.C. Choi. 2011a. Current status of insect pollinators use in strawberry crop in Korea. Korean J. Apic. 26: 143-155. Yoon, H.J., K.Y. Lee, I.G. Park, M.I. Kim, Y.M. Kim and P.D. Kang. 2012a. Current status of insect pollinators use in apple orchards. Korean J. Apic. 27: 105-116. Yoon, H.J., K.Y. Lee, I.G. Park, M.I. Kim, Y.M. Kim and P.D. Kang. 2013. Current status of insect pollinators use for horticultural crops in 2011. Korean J. Apic. 28(1): 9-18.