Microsoft Word doc

Similar documents
아동기에주의력결핍과잉행동증상을경험한성인의정신병리와기질성격요인 Psychopathology, Temperament, and Character Factors of Adults with Childhood Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Symptom

012임수진

- 연구대상및방법 1. 연구대상 - 2. 연구방법 1) 검사도구의선정 2) 검사대상

교실, 놀이터, 혹은 유사 임상적 환경에서 실행한다. 대부분의 경우, 주의력과 충동 조 절에 대한 직접 검사(예:Continuous Performance Test)를 통해서는 실제 환경에서 수 집된 자료 이상의 정보를 얻기 힘들다. 유아들 간의 행동 다양성뿐 아니라 초

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff


Table 1. The variables of T.O.V.A. inattention impulsivity disinhibition variability inconsistency 200msec., 291

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

hwp

歯5-4-04(윤치연외).PDF

°ø±â¾Ð±â±â

Lumbar spine

歯남민4.PDF

7.ƯÁýb71ÎÀ¯È« š

159

online ML Comm ORIGINAL ARTICLE 양극성장애부모의자녀에서정신질환 J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2014;53(5): Print

<40BBE7BBF3C3BCC1FAC7D0C8B8C1F65F32332D33C8A32034C2F7BFEB2E687770>

구로아동청소년리플렛-2.qxp

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

2.대상 및 범위(계속) 하천 하천 등급 하천명 연장 (km) 연장 (km) 시점 금회수립현황 종점 지방 하천 함안천 경남 함안군 여항면 내곡리 경남 함안군 함안면 함안천(국가)기점 검단천 경남 함안군 칠북면 검단리 칠원천 6.70

16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

1. 연구대상 연구방법 196

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

노인정신의학회보14-1호

J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2016;55(1):33-40 과 평가 당시의 기분 상태 스트레스 대처방식 등의 요인들이 스트레스의 취약성에 영향을 주는 것으로 알려져 있다 그중에서도 성격은 스트레스 지각에 매우 큰 영향을 주는 변수로서 주어진 상

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의


2014 자격연수 제1기_수정.hwp

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다



서론 34 2


상담학연구 ADHD- : ) 2) 3) 4) 5).,.,. MMPI, K-CBCL, KPR-C,. (Corresponding Author): / / 47 / Tel: /

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>


(5차 편집).hwp


:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>


1. 연구대상 연구방법 2. 측정도구 3. 명상법소개및연구절차 492

- 최원희ㆍ 김명희: 중년후기 여성의 집단회상 경험과 효과에 대한 연구 - 에 직면하며 심리 사회적인 역할갈등, 고립, 위축, 상실 감 등을 경험하게 된다. 이 시기동안 위기에 잘 대처하 지 못하면 자신에 대하여 실망하며 두려움과 슬픔 등 을 겪으면서 자아존중감이 낮아

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

(conversion disorder),, (,,, 2000;,, 1996;, 2002; Kozlowska, Scher, & Williams, 2011; Uijen & Bischoff, 2011). (,, 1996;,, 2001;, 2004; Ruddy & House,

Æ÷Àå82š

ePapyrus PDF Document

<352EC7E3C5C2BFB55FB1B3C5EBB5A5C0CCC5CD5FC0DABFACB0FAC7D0B4EBC7D02E687770>

Original Article J Sasang Constitut Med 2016;28(3): 중학생에서사상성격검사 (SPQ) 의생리심리적타당화연구 이수진 * ㆍ윤보미 * ㆍ최영

Can032.hwp


석사논문.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

서론 1. 연구대상 1) 정상군 연구대상및방법 2) 성격장애군 526

< 학술연구용역사업최종보고서 > 지역사회정신건강고위험군아동청소년추적관리코호트확대 (The follow-up and management system for children and adolescents at high-risk of mental health dwelling

<35BFCFBCBA2E687770>

1..

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

*.,., ,. ( ) (TCI, Cloninger).,.,,.,,.,,. * :,,

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

A 617

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

19 세미만인구의정신장애진단분포 치가 필요한 것으로 조사된 군은 명 인 것으로 발표되었다 년부터 년까지 국내 청소년 사망 원인 중 가장 많은 것이 자살이며 년 자살 충동에 대한 조사 결과 가 지난 년 동안 한 번이라도 자살하고 싶다는 생각을 해 본 적이 있다 고 응답하

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타


9(3)-4(p ).fm

<38BFF93238C0CF28B1DDBFE4C0CF2920BFB9BBF3B9E8B4E72E786C7378>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

,......


<5BBEF0BEEE33332D335D20312EB1E8B4EBC0CD2E687770>

최종ok-1-4.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

Original Article Psychoanalysis 2019;30(1):1-8 pissn / eissn Temperament and Psych

online ML Comm ORIGINAL ARTICLE ISSN / eissn Korean J Biol Psychiatry 2012;19: 서울대학교의과대학정신과학교실, 1 서울대학교인문대학인지과학협동과정, 2 이화여자

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

< FC1F8B9E6B1B3C0B02E687770>

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

歯6권2호.PDF

Microsoft Word doc

황지웅

노영남

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

다문화 가정의 부모

Transcription:

KISEP Original Article J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 45, No 1 주의력결핍과잉행동장애환아들의기질및성격특성 장원석 홍성도 정유숙 Temperament and Character Patterns of Patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Won Seok Jang, MD, Sungdo D Hong, MD and Yoosook Joung, MD, PhD Department of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Objectives:The purpose of this study is to compare temperament/character patterns of patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorders with normal controls. Methods:The Junior Temperament and Character Inventory was given to a clinical sample of one hundred - four patients with ADHD (all male, mean age 10.46±1.45) and their parents. The diagnoses were done using DSM-IV criteria. Fifty ones of the patients with ADHD were confirmed by K-SADS-PL-K. One hundred forty four normal controls (all male, mean age 13.26±0.26) and their parents were enrolled to compare temperament and character patterns with ADHD patients. Results:Novelty seeking was significantly higher in parental JTCI of patients with ADHD. Reward dependence, persistence, self directedness, cooperativeness and self transcendence (ST23) were significantly lower in both self and parental JTCI of patients with ADHD. Using K-SADS-PL-K, ADHD patients were divided into three groups with their ADHD subtype (combined type:32, inattentive type:11, NOS type:7). Self transcendence (ST23) in self JTCI was significantly lower in ADHD patients of the inattentive type than those of the combined type. Conclusion:The temperament and character patterns of ADHD patients were different from those of normal controls. Novelty seeking was significantly higher in the ADHD patients. Reward dependence, persistence, self directedness, cooperativeness, self transcendence (ST23) were significantly lower in the ADHD patients. (J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2006; 45(1):77-82) KEY WORDS:Temperament ADHD JTCI. 서 론 - 77

방법 연구대상 측정도구 아동용기질성격검사 (Junior temperament and character inventory) - K-SADS-PL-K(Korean Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia -Present and Lifetime Version-Korean Version) 통계분석 결과 78

Table 1. Temperament and character patterns of subjects self rating scale Scale ADHD No MeanSD NC No MeanSD Significance* NS 95 08.293.20 137 08.012.72 0.47* HA 95 10.494.28 137 09.934.53 0.34* RD 95 07.282.61 137 08.712.43 0.00* SD 95 10.223.18 136 11.812.80 0.00* C 95 11.873.44 134 13.903.08 0.00* ST1 95 01.551.48 144 01.551.31 0.99* ST23 95 02.471.57 139 02.951.45 0.02* NCnormal controls, NSnovelty seeking, HAharm avoidance, RDreward dependence, SDself directedness, Ccooperativeness, STself transcendence, independent t test Table 2. Temperament and character patterns of subjects parent rating scale Scale ADHD No MeanSD NC No MeanSD Significance* NS 104 10.183.26 129 08.293.31 0.00* HA 104 09.294.48 125 10.033.83 0.18* RD 104 04.492.30 130 05.142.10 0.00* PS 104 00.881.04 130 01.941.46 0.00* SD 104 07.763.60 128 11.723.98 0.00* C 104 11.634.03 126 14.372.91 0.00* ST1 104 01.081.10 131 01.210.99 0.31* ST23 104 01.321.17 127 01.841.30 0.00* NCnormal controls, NSnovelty seeking, HAharm avoidance, RDreward dependence, PSpersistence, SDself directedness, Ccooperativeness, STself transcendence, independent t test 고찰 - 79

Table 3. Temperament and character patterns of subjects stratified by subtype of ADHD Scale Combined type n32 Inattentive type n11 NOS n7 df P value Self rating NS 22.77 24.00 18.75 2.72 HA 21.64 21.55 28.08 2.52 RD 21.16 26.75 21.67 2.48 SD 21.52 24.40 23.92 2.46 C 21.82 24.40 22.50 2.30 ST1 22.63 23.45 20.33 2.24 ST23 25.71 12.65 23.92 2 *.02* Parent rating NS 24.92 24.91 29.07 2.78 HA 24.02 24.82 33.36 2.30 RD 23.45 30.27 27.36 2.37 PS 26.73 25.00 20.64 2.55 SD 23.34 29.82 28.57 2.37 C 23.95 30.23 25.14 2.47 ST1 25.98 26.59 21.57 2.71 ST23 25.92 28.68 18.57 2.31 Data are given as mean rank unless otherwise indicated NSnovelty seeking, HAharm avoidance, RDreward dependence, PSpersistence, SDself directedness, Ccooperativeness, STself transcendence, NOSnot otherwise specified, Kruskal Wallis test - 80

결 중심단어 REFERENCES 1) Barkley RA. A critique of current diagnostic criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: clinical and research implications. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1990;11:343-352. 2) APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington D.C. American Psychiatric Association Press;1994. 3) Szatmari P, Offord DR. Correlates, associated impairments and patterns of service utilization of children with attention deficit disorder: finding from the Ontario Child Health Study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1989;30:205-217. 4) 조수철, 신윤오. 파탄적행동장애의유병률에대한연구. 소아청소년정신의학 1991;41:141-149. 5) 홍강의, 오경자. 소아정신과와소아과외래환자의과잉행동에관한연구. 최신정신의학 1980;23:51-57. 6) Shastry BS. Molecular genetics of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an update. Neurochem Int 2004;44:469-474. 론 81

7) Bates. Concepts and measurement of temperament: in Kohnstamm GA, Bates JE, Rothbart MK (eds): Temperament in Childhood. Chichester Wiley & Sons;1989. p.3-26. 8) Goldsmith HH, Buss AH, Plomin R, MK R. What is temperament? Four approaches. Child Dev 1987;58:505-527. 9) Goldsmith HH, Gottesman II. Origins of variation in behavioral style: a longitudinal study of temperament in young twins. Child Dev 1981; 52:91-103. 10) Comings DE, Gade-Andavolu R, Gonzalez N, Wu S, Muhleman D, Blake H, et al. A multivariate analysis of 59 candidate genes in personality traits: the temperament and character inventory. Clin Genet 2000;58:375-385. 11) Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM. The temperament and character inventory (TCI): a guide to its development and use. Washinton Univ, St Louis; Missouri: Center for psychobiology of personality;1994. 12) Luby JL, Svrakic DM, McCallum K, Przybeck TR, Cloninger CR. The Junior Temperament and Character Inventory: preliminary validation of a child self-report measure. Psychol Rep 1999;84:1127-1138. 13) Lyoo IK, Han CH, Lee SJ, Yune SK, Ha JH, Chung SJ, et al. The reliability and validity of the junior temperament and character inventory. Compr Psychiatry 2004;45:121-128. 14) Kim YS, Cheon KA, Kim BN, Chang SA, Yoo HJ, Kim JW, et al. The reliability and validity of Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version- Korean version (K-SADS-PL-K). Yonsei Med J 2004;45:81-89. 15) 박병관. 학습능력검사. 한국심리검사연구소 ;2000. 16) 소유경, 노주선, 김영신, 고선규, 고윤주. 한국어판부모교사 ADHD 평가척도의신뢰도와타당도연구. 신경정신의학 2002; 41:283-289. 17) Thomas A, Chess S. Temperament and development;1977. 18) Rutter M. Temperament, Personality and Personality Disorders. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:443-458. 19) Strelau J. Temperament: a psychological perspective. New York: Plenum Press;1998. 20) Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:573-588. 21) Cloninger CR, Svarakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993;50:975-990. 22) Ebstein RP, Novick O, Umansky R, Priel B, Osher Y, Blaine D, et al. Dopamine D4 receptor exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty seeking. Nat Genet 1996;12:78-80. 23) Benjamin J, Li L, Patterson C, Greenberg BD, Murphy DL, Hamer DA. Populational and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measure of Novelty seeking. Nat Genet 1996;12: 81-84. 24) Bussing R, Gary FA, Mason DM, Leon CE, Sinha K, Garvan CW. Child temperament, ADHD, and caregiver strain: exploring relationships in an epidemiological sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003;42:184-192. 25) Tillman R, Geller B, Craney JL, Bolhofner K, Williams M, Zimerman B, et al. Temperament and character factors in a prepubertal and early adolescent bipolar disorder phenotype compared to attention deficit hyperactive and normal controls. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2003;13:531-543. 26) Eddy LS, Toro TJ, Salamero BM, Castro FJ, Cruz Hernandez M. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. A survey to evaluate risk factors, associated factors and parental child rearing behavior. An Esp Pediatr 1999;50:145-150. 27) 조수철, 김동현, 김자성. 주의력결핍과잉운동장애아의기질적특성. 소아청소년정신의학 1993;4:114-123. 28) Herbst JH, Zonderman AB, McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Do the dimensions of the Temperament and Character Inventory map a simple genetic architecture? Evidence from molecular genetics and factor analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:1285-1290. 82