I. 서론 한국과독일의기혼여성고용불평등비교
II. 이론적배경
Ⅲ. 국가별정책레짐의전개와변화
Ⅳ. 연구방법
Ⅴ. 연구결과
χ χ
Ⅵ. 결론
김연명 (2013), 한국복지국가의성격과전망 : 남부유럽복지체제와의비교를중심으로 한국사회복지조사연구 36: 27-59 김유미 (2017), 독일의일 가정양립지원정책및효과 고령화리뷰 10호, 보험연구원김지경 조유현. (2003), 젊은여성의첫출산후노동시장복귀에관한분석 노동경제논집 26(3호 ): 181-207 김진욱 고은주 (2014), 맞벌이부부의가정내무급노동시간영향요인국가비교 : 노르웨이, 독일, 영국, 프랑스, 한국 사회복지정책 41(2): 185-212 김정호 (2012), 육아휴직지원과여성의노동공급 김해순 (2013), 독일통일이후일-가족조화정책과여성경제활동 : 성별분업을위주로 젠더와문화 6(2): 7-42 관계부처합동 (2012), 보육서비스개선대책 민현주 (2011), 여성의경력단절기간별생애사건효과분석 백선희 (2008), 이명박정부의보육정책에대한비판적고찰 KYC 공동육아와공동체교육 참여연대사회복지위원회 한국여성단체연합주최 이명박정부의보육정책과연수요자중심인가? 토론회자료집 (2208. 5. 19) (2011), 보육의공공성강화를위한정책방안 한국보건사회연구원이선주 (2007), 독일의부모수당도입배경과의의. 국제리뷰 한국여성개발원송다영 (2012), 돌봄정책의국가별상이성과젠더관점 : 아동보육부문을중심으로 가족과문화 24(3): 1-33 (2013), 여성주의관점에서본생애주기별복지와돌봄패러다임 페미니즘연구 13(1): 93-129 윤미례 김태일 (2016), 출산여성의노동시장참여상황, 유형과영향요인분석 정책분석평가회보 26(2): 153-185 윤미례 김태일 (2017), 준실험설계에의한보육지원정책의고용효과분석 한국행정학회 51(1): 205-231 윤자영 (2014), 모성보호제도의고용효과 월간노동리뷰 (2014-6), 한국노동연구원 (2017), 일 가정양립지원제도의노동시장효과 : 근로자단위 월간노동리뷰 (2017-2), 한국노동연구원윤홍식 (2014), 박근혜정부의가족화정책과성, 계층불평등성의확대- 보수정부 6년의가족정책을중심으로 경제와사회 (101) 전윤정 (2015), 탈상품화 탈가족화관점에서본한국의일 가족양립정책, 1990 2014: 출산휴가 육아휴직제도와보육정책을중심으로 한국여성학 31(3) 정재훈 (2003), 보수주의복지국가의성차별적특성분석 : 독일보육수당 휴가정책변화를중심으로 사회복지연구 22: 257-289 (2013), 가족을우선하는활성화정책 (activation policy)- 독일사례를중심으로 여성연구 85(2): 45-80 홍찬숙 (2011), 시간제고용은일 / 가족양립을지원하는적합한방법인가?: 구동서독지역여성노동시장비교를통한접근 경제와사회 90: 363-386 2015 고용보험행정DB를활용한노동시장분석 한국고용정보원여성가족부 (2006), 새싹플랜 - 제1차중장기보육계획 (2006~2010) 채혜원 (2017), 독일 : 독일의 남녀동일임금지급 을위한법안발표와남은과제국제동향 http://www.kwdi.re.kr/noticeview.kw;kwdi_kor=0915b72e893b8f810f9a3d023dfb3fe2.worker_kwdi?sgrp=s01&sitecmscd=cm0001 &topcmscd=cm0003&cmscd=cm0026&pnum=4&cnum=2&ntno=1493&dvsn=&src=&srctemp=&currtpg=1, 한국여성정책연구원 Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Workds of Welfare Capitalism 박시종 ( 역 )(2007), 복지자본주의의세가지세계, 성균관대출판부. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies 박시종 ( 역 ) (2007), 복지체제의위기와대응, 성균관대출판부.. (2009), The incomplete revolution: adapting to women s new roles. Polity 주은선 김영미 ( 역 ) (2013), 끝나지않은혁명 : 성역할의혁명, 고령화에대응하는복지국가의도전, 나눔의집. Closing the Gender Gap Act Now (Korean version): Act Now (Korean version), OECD( 역 ), 성별격차해소를위한정책제언 Adema Clarke Frey Greulich Kim Rattenhuber Thévenon(2017), Work/life balance policy in Germany: Promoting equal partnership in families International Social Security Association 70(2): 31 55 Blau, D. M., and Robins, P. K. (1988), Child-Care Costs and Family Labor Supply, Review of Economics and Statistics 70(3), 374-81 Gundula, Z. and H. Irina(2017), The Expansion of Low-Cost, State-Subsidized Childcare Availability and Mothers' Return-to-Work Behaviour in East and West Germany, European Sociological Review 33(5): 693-707 Gustafsson, S. S., Wetzels, C., Vlasblom, J. D. and Dex, S.(1996), Women s labor force transitions in connection with childbirth: A panel data comparison between Germany, Sweden and Great Britain, Journal of Population Ecomomics 9(3): 223-246 Hoherz, S.(2014), Maternity leave in the context of couples: The impact of both partners' characteristics and employment experiences on mothers' re-entry into the labour market, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Berlin Konietzka, D and Kreyenfeld, M(2010) The growing educational divide in mothers employment: An investigation based on the German micro-censuses 1976-2004, Work, Employment
and Society 24(2): 260-278 Kopf, E. and C. Zabel(2017), Activation programmes for women with a partner in Germany: Challenge or replication of traditional gender roles Int J Soc Welfare 26: 239 253 Leitner, M.(2003), Varieties of Familialism: The Caring Function of the Family in Comparative Perspective European Societies 5(4): 353-375 (2017), Gender and Family in European Economic Policy- Reconciliation of Employment and Childcare in Austria, Germany and Iceland. Examples for Gender Equality in Family Life? Developments in the New Millenniu Liechti, L.(2016), Resource-related inequalities in mothers employment in two family-policy regimes: evidence from Switzerland and West Germany European Societies 19(1): 91-112 Lokteff, M and Piercy, K.(2012), "Who Cares for the Children?" Lessons from a Global Perspective of Child Care Policy Journal of Child and Family Studies 21(1): 120-130 Sainsbury, D.(eds.)(1996), Gender, Equality, and Welfare States. Cambridge University Press Sainsbury, D.(ed.)(1999), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press Saraceno(2016), Varieties of familialism: Comparing four southern European and East Asian welfare regimes Journal of European Social Policy 26(4): 314-326 Schober Spiess(2015), Local Day Care Quality and Maternal Employment: Evidence From East and West Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(3): 712-729 Schober, Pia S and Schmitt, Christian(2013), Day-Care Expansion and Parental Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Germany. Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Wippermann, C.(2016) Was junge Frauen wollen, Lebensrealitäten und familien- und gleichstellungspolitische Erwartungen von Frauen zwischen 18 und 40 Jahren Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Forum Politik und Gesellschaft Zoch Hondralis(2017), The Expansion of Low-Cost, State-Subsidized Childcare Availability and Mother Return-to-Work Behaviour in East and West Germany(2017). European Sociological Review 33(5): 693-707 http://www.dw.com/en/family-policy-becomes-new-german-election-battleground/a-3829232 6 한국 독일 아빠 - 파트엄마 - 전일엄마 - 파트아빠 - 파트엄마 - 전일엄마 - 파트 2001 335.2 62.3 114.8 100.9 66.9 66.5 2002 280.4 62.5 91.2 106.5 67.8 68.5 2003 244.9 63.8 103.7 88.1 71.2 68.3 2004 136.8 60.8 88.1 93.3 70.5 74.2 2005 120.9 57.2 64.9 77.2 67.7 71.6 2006 137.8 57.6 68.5 72.0 69.2 68.7 2007 119.6 56.0 69.6 80.5 67.5 68.5 2008 143.3 59.7 50.7 107.4 64.3 67.5 2009 109.1 60.1 60.0 102.7 70.8 71.6 2010 132.5 62.0 59.8 99.7 72.4 70.4 2011 162.3 61.1 64.3 104.1 70.6 70.9 2012 86.8 65.0 54.8 103.3 73.6 73.1 2013 126.8 64.2 57.4 90.4 78.6 72.6 2014 95.6 66.2 63.6 85.6 69.3 74.4 2015 103.4 64.4 63.2 95.1 75.1 77.3 2016 89.9 67.6 63.2 - - -