<303820BFF8C0FA C8B2BFEBC0CF2DBFC0BFACB8F D E687770>

Similar documents
노인정신의학회보14-1호

012임수진

hwp


한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

Rheu-suppl hwp

Lumbar spine

139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ



A 617

< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

(

untitled



서론 34 2

歯1.PDF

<30312DC1A4BAB8C5EBBDC5C7E0C1A4B9D7C1A4C3A52DC1A4BFB5C3B62E687770>


03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö

untitled

( )Jkstro011.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

00약제부봄호c03逞풚


278 경찰학연구제 12 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 31 호 )

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Jkcs022(89-113).hwp

03-서연옥.hwp

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

14.531~539(08-037).fm

Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

04조남훈

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

1..

자기공명영상장치(MRI) 자장세기에 따른 MRI 품질관리 영상검사의 개별항목점수 실태조사 A B Fig. 1. High-contrast spatial resolution in phantom test. A. Slice 1 with three sets of hole arr

슬라이드 1

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

03이경미(237~248)ok

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

Sheu HM, et al., British J Dermatol 1997; 136: Kao JS, et al., J Invest Dermatol 2003; 120:


구의 중요성이 인식되기 시작하였다(Kang & Lee, 2001). 이에 대한 결과로 1990 년대 이후 국내에서도 만성신부전환자의 혈액투석경험 (Shin, 1997), 신장이식 체험(Lee, 1998) 과 만성질환자의 강인성에 관한 연구 (Ko, 1999)등 만성질환

서론

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

달생산이 초산모 분만시간에 미치는 영향 Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 達 은 23) 의 丹 溪 에 최초로 기 재된 처방으로, 에 복용하면 한 다하여 난산의 예방과 및, 등에 널리 활용되어 왔다. 達 은 이 毒 하고 는 甘 苦 하여 氣, 氣 寬,, 結 의 효능이 있

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

< FB5B5BAF1B6F32C20B8F1C2F D34292E687770>

<30372EC0CCC0AFC1F82E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

???춍??숏

???? 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

<626BBBE7B7CAB0FCB8AEC1F6C4A7BCAD30332E687770>

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

Trd022.hwp

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

Anxiety and Mood Vol 13, No 2 / pissn / eissn REVIEW ARTICLE 국내우울증평가도구타당화연구의체계적고찰-진단적

09구자용(489~500)

12이문규

YI Ggodme : The Lives and Diseases of Females during the Latter Half of the Joseon Dynasty as Reconstructed with Cases in Yeoksi Manpil (Stray Notes w

기관고유연구사업결과보고

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

원위부요척골관절질환에서의초음파 유도하스테로이드주사치료의효과 - 후향적 1 년경과관찰연구 - 연세대학교대학원 의학과 남상현

페링야간뇨소책자-내지-16

Treatment and Role of Hormaonal Replaement Therapy

[ 영어영문학 ] 제 55 권 4 호 (2010) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1) Kyuchul Yoon, Ji-Yeon Oh & Sang-Cheol Ahn. Teaching English prosody through English poems with clon


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<5BB0F8B0F8BFECC6ED5D20C3D6C1BEBAB8B0EDBCAD5F BFCF292E687770>

online ML Comm ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2013;52: ISSN 한글판우울증선별도구 (Patient Health Qustionnaire-2)

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

전립선암발생률추정과관련요인분석 : The Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II (KCPS-II)



44-4대지.07이영희532~

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

보건사회연구-25일수정

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

±èÇ¥³â

2009;21(1): (1777) 49 (1800 ),.,,.,, ( ) ( ) 1782., ( ). ( ) 1,... 2,3,4,5.,,, ( ), ( ),. 6,,, ( ), ( ),....,.. (, ) (, )

Pharmacotherapeutics Application of New Pathogenesis on the Drug Treatment of Diabetes Young Seol Kim, M.D. Department of Endocrinology Kyung Hee Univ

J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2014;53(2):61-71 보험회사의 합리적 선택은 무엇이게 되는가 그리고 그 합리 성을 넘어설 수 있는 원리는 무엇이어야 하는가 보험을 유지하는 또 다른 요소는 사회적 연대 - 이다 사회적 연대는 합리성과 대척


김범수

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

Transcription:

대한내과학회지 : 제 83 권제 4 호 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2012.83.4.468 COPD 환자에서우울증선별검사 1 한림대학교성심병원호흡기내과, 2 고려대학교근거중심의학연구소, 3 가톨릭대학교성바오로병원정신과, 4 국립의료원호흡기내과, 5 울산대학교의과대학서울아산병원호흡기내과 황용일 1 김현정 2 원왕연 3 조준성 4 오연목 5 정기석 1 이상도 5 Screening for Depression in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review Yong Il Hwang 1, Hyun Jung Kim 2, Wang Youn Won 3, Joon Sung Joh 4, Yeon-Mok Oh 5, Ki-Suck Jung 1, and Sang-Do Lee 5 1 Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 2 Institute for Evidence-Based Medicine, Korea University, 3 Department of Psychiatry, St. Paul's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, 4 Department of International Medicine, National Medical Center, 5 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Background/Aims: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often coexists with co-morbid conditions that significantly affect the prognosis. Although depression frequently coexists with COPD, little about how to screen for depression in COPD patients is known. We report the effectiveness of depression screening in patients with COPD and of the instruments used for this purpose. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review of the domestic (Research Information Sharing Service, KoreaMed, and Kmbase) and international (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library) databases using COPD AND depression AND screening tools as key words. Results: No study directly evaluated the effectiveness of screening for depression in COPD patients. However, depression was present more frequently in patients with COPD. COPD patients with depression were also more likely to be in poor health. A total of eight screening instruments for depression were translated into Korean. All had similar reliabilities and internal consistencies. Conclusions: Screening of COPD patients for depression is necessary because individuals with this condition are more likely to suffer from depression, which has a negative impact on health. The choice of depression screening instruments may need to be based on considerations of simplicity. (Korean J Med 2012;83:468-475) Keywords: COPD; Depression; Screening Received: 2012. 4. 24 Revised: 2012. 6. 13 Accepted: 2012. 7. 26 Correspondence to Yeon-Mok Oh, M.D. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and Clinical Research Center for Chronic Obstructive Airway Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asanbyeongwon-gil 86, Sonpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea Tel: +82-2-3010-3136, Fax: +82-2-3010-6968, E-mail: ymoh55@amc.seoul.kr Copyright c 2012 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution - 468 - Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

- Yong Il Hwang, et al. Screening for depression in COPD - 서론우울증은많은만성질환과관련이있다. 종합병원내과계환자들의 10-20% 에서우울증이동반되어있는것으로알려져있다 [1]. 실제로당뇨병환자의 11% [2], 보존적치료를받는암환자들의 15% [3], 심근경색환자들의 20% [4], 파킨슨병환자의 17% [5] 가우울증에이환되어있다. 우울증은질환자체가가지고있는불쾌한감정상태와는별개로동반질환의예후를나쁘게한다. 우울증은인해동반질환에대한환자들의순응도가떨어뜨리며 [6] 환자들의삶의질에영향을준다. 또한우울증은심부전 [7], 후천성면역결핍증 (HIV/AIDS) [8], 암 [9], 신부전 [10], 심근경색 [11], 뇌졸중 [12] 과같은질환의사망률을높이는것으로알려져있다. 이처럼우울증은많은만성질환에서환자들에게흔하고중요한문제로만성질환에동반된우울증의치료에대한중요성은계속강조되어오고있다. 만성폐쇄성폐질환 (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD) 은우리나라에서 2001년도에 45세이상성인에서 17.2%, 2008년도에는 40세이상의성인의 13.4% 에서 COPD에이환되어있는것으로조사될정도로흔한질환이다 [13]. COPD 는심근경색과협심증, 골다공증, 골절, 당뇨, 빈혈, 수면장애등다른질환이잘동반되며, 우울증도그중의하나로알려져있다 [14]. 하지만, 현재 COPD 환자들에게우울증의선별검사의효과와선별검사를무슨도구로시행해야하는지알려진바가전혀없는실정이다. 이에저자들은 COPD 환자에서우울증선별검사효과와우울증진단도구로일차진료의가선별검사목적으로사용할수있는것이어느것인지알아보기위해 COPD 환자에게우울증선별검사를하는것이필요한가? 와 우울증진단도구중, 일선진료의의선별검사목적으로권장할만한것은무엇인가? 라는두가지핵심질문을선정하고이에대한답을구하고자하였다. 방법저자들은위의두가지핵심질문에대한답을얻기위해체계적인문헌고찰을수행하였다. 체계적인문헌고찰을위해먼저선정된핵심질문에대한핵심용어를선정한후선정된핵심용어를바탕으로데이터베이스에서문헌검색을시행하였다. 검색된문헌은연구자들이초록을확인한후최종문헌을선택하였다. 핵심용어의선정문헌검색에사용된핵심용어는국문의경우 만성폐쇄성폐질환 AND 우울증 AND 선별검사 영문의경우는 COPD AND depression AND screening tools 였으며유사어로 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive lung disease, obstructive lung disease, obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive lung diseases, obstructive pulmonary diseases, dysthymua, depressive disorder, depressive symptoms, depressive mood, diagnosis, psychometric scale, psychometric questionnaire, detection, identification 을사용하였다. 문헌검색첫번째핵심질문을위한문헌검색을위해사용한데이터베이스로는국내의경우코리아메드 (www.koreamed.org), 학술연구정보서비스 (www.riss.kr), 국내의학학술지초록검색 (kmbase.medric.or.kr) 를이용하였고국외의경우는 Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library를이용하였다. 검색하고자하는문헌의종류는메타분석, 대조임상시험, 비대조임상시험, 관찰연구모두포함하고사용된언어는영어와한국어로제한하였다. 두번째핵심질문인 COPD 환자에게적절한선별검사도구와관련하여서는국제적으로신체질환이있는환자들에게우울증선별검사로권장되는우울증선별도구 [15] 중한국어로번역되어검증이완료된선별도구에한해서만연구를진행하여국내문헌만을대상으로검색을수행하였다. 선택된문헌의질평가본연구에서포함된연구에대한문헌의질평가는무작위대조군연구의경우의질평가는 QUADAS tool, 비무작위대조군연구의질평가는 Newcastle-Ottawa Scale 을이용하여수행하였다. 또한문헌검색결과얻어진결과에대한근거수준평가는개별연구의연구디자인에따른문헌의질평가결과와연구결과의일관성, 연구결과의직접성, 효과의크기, 연구결과의정확성, 출판오류, 측정된효과의양반응, 교란변수의가능성등을고려한 GRADE 그룹 (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation [GRADE] Working Group) 에서제시하는방법론에따라평가하였다. - 469 -

- 대한내과학회지 : 제 83 권제 4 호통권제 626 호 2012 - 결과 COPD 환자에게우울증선별검사를하는것이필요한가? 첫번째핵심질문에대해서는총 250개의문헌이검색되었으며이중 COPD 환자에서우울증선별검사의효과에대한관찰연구 2편 [16,17], COPD 환자의우울증유병률에대한메타분석 1편 [18], 대규모역학연구 3편 [19-21] 과국내연구 4편 [22-25] 을선택하였다 (Table 1). COPD 환자들을대상으로우울증선별검사의유용성을조사한무작위대조연구는검색이되지않았지만 COPD 환자들을대상으로한우울증선별검사에대한관찰연구결과를보면우울증선별검사를통해 COPD 환자들의 11.2% [16], 12.9% [17] 에서주요우울증 (major depression) 이진단되었으며메타연구결과에서는 COPD 환자의우울증유병률은 24.6% (95% CI: 20.0-28.6%) 로조사되어대조군의유병률 11.7% (95% CI: 9.0-15.1%) 보다통계적으로의미있게높았다 [18]. 또한 COPD 환자의우울증위험도 (Odds Ratio, OR) 도 2.81에서 4.26 [18-20] 까지조사가되어 COPD 환자들이우울증에이환될위험이높을뿐만아니라 COPD 환자들은일반인들보다심리적인고통을더많이겪고있는것으로조사되었다 [21]. 우울증선별검사에대한관찰연구와메타분석사이의유병률차이에대해서는추가적인연구가필요할것이다. 국내연구결과들은외국의연구보다는우울증의유병률이높게조사가되었다. 국내 COPD 환자들은 17% [22] 에서 55% 까지우울증이동반되어있으며 [23-25] 이는일반인의우울증유병률보다높은것이다 [48]. COPD 환자들이우울증의위험도는 2.7로조사되었다 [25]. 국내연구에서는 COPD 환자들의삶의질에대해서도조사가된연구가두가지있었으며 [23,24] 우울증점수와삶의질을나타내는 St. Goerge Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), COPD Assessment test (CAT) 사이에유의한상관관계가관찰되었다. 우울증진단도구중, 일선진료의의선별검사목적으로권장할만한것은무엇인가? 두번째질문에대해서는국내데이터베이스에서총 11,582 개문헌이검색되었으며중복된문헌을제외하고우울증진단을위해타당도검증을시행한문헌을추출하여총 22 개의문헌이선택되었다 [26-47]. 검사도구별로는 Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) 1편 [26], Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) 1편 [27], Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) 4편 [28-31], Zung s Self-Rating Depression Scale (SRS) 3편 [32-34], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 1편 [35], Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 5편 [36-40], Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) 5편 [41-45], Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 2편 [46,47] 이었다. 이중환자의자가기입이가능한도구는여섯가지이다 [28-47]. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) 17개의항목으로구성된관찰자평가척도로 103명의주요우울증환자를대상으로한연구에서높은내적일치도 (chronbach α = 0.76) 을보였고 MADRS 와높은상관관계를보였고 (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) BDI 와도의미있는상관관계를보였다 (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) [26]. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) 10개의항목으로구성된관찰자평가척도로 107명의주요우울증환자를대상으로한연구에서높은내적일치도 (chronbach α = 0.79) 를보였고 HDRS와높은상관관계를보였고 (r = 0.82, p < 0.001) 자가보고척도인 BDI와도의미있는상관관계를보였다 (r = 0.47, p < 0.001) [27]. Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) 20개의항목으로구성된자가보고형평가척도로일반인을대상으로하여내적일치도를평가한네가지연구에서모두높은내적일치도를보였다 (0.84, 0.89, 0.91, 0.91) [28-31]. 우울증환자에서의내적일치도도 0.89로높게측정되었다 [30]. 우울증진단을위한절단점 (cut-off point) 은외국의경우일반적으로는 16점이상을우울증선별을위한값으로사용하나우울증, 정신분열증, 알코올의존환자들의 CED-D 를비교한초기연구에서는 16점이상인환자의비율이우울증에서는 100%, 정신분열증에서는 61%, 알코올의존증에서는 52% 로조사되어 16점보다는높은값의필요성이제기되었고 [28] 이후연구에서는 24점을절단점으로사용할경우민감도 94%, 특이도 100% 로조사되었으며 [29] 또다른연구에서는정신과환자들을대상으로사용할경우에는 25점, 일반인을대상으로사용할경우에는 21점을절단점으로제시하였다 [30]. - 470 -

- 황용일외 6 인. COPD 환자에서우울증선별검사 - Table 1. Prevalence of depression in COPD patients Author/year Design Sample size Definition Results Julian, et al. 2009 Lamers, et al. 2008 Zhang, et al. 2011 Cross-sectional COPD, n = 188 COPD = physician diagnosis Cross-sectional Meta-analysis COPD, n = 118 8 studies included COPD, n = 39,587 Control, n = 39,431 Depression = MINI International Neuropsychiatric Inventory COPD = physician diagnosis Depression = MINI International Neuropsychiatric Inventory COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD; chronic obstructive airway disease; COAD; chronic obstructive lung; chronic airway obstruction; chronic bronchitis; emphysema [This does not follow the format used elsewhere and the meaning of the second COPD and the final disorders is unclear.] 11.2% 12.9% COPD = 24.6% vs. control =11.7% Pooled odds ratio: 2.81 (95% CI: 1.69-4.66) Egede. 2007 Cross-sectional General population n = 30,801 Wilhelm K, et al. 2003 Wagena EJ, et al. 2005 Chin HJ, et al. 2008 Ryu YJ, et al. 2007 Hwang YI, et al. 2010 Ryu YJ, et al. 2010 Cross-sectional COPD n = 1,681 General population n = 10,641 Cross-sectional COPD, n = 118 General population, n = 500 Psychiatric outpatients, n = 500 Depression = depress COPD = self reported Depression = SIDI-SF Chronic bronchitis = self reported Depression: DSM- IV COPD: Gold guideline No or mild depression: BDI < 15 Moderate-to-severe depression: BDI 15 Cross-sectional COPD, n = 59 COPD: Gold guidelines Cross-sectional COPD, n = 72 Control, n = 50 Depression: CES-D 21 COPD: GOLD guidelines Depression: BDI 21 Cross-sectional COPD, n = 803 COPD: GOLD guidelines Cross-sectional COPD, n = 84 Control, n = 73 Depression: PHQ-9 10 COPD: GOLD guidelines Depression: No or mild depression: BDI < 16 Moderate-to-severe depression: BDI 16 15.4% (13.6,17.4) OR = 3.21 (95% CI: 2.72-3.79) (COPD vs. no health problem) OR = 4.26 (95% CI: 2.47-7.34) (Chronic bronchitis: present vs. absent) 29.6% Total SCL-90-R score: COPD 153.7 ± 53.7 vs. general population 119.4 ± 33.4 (p 0.01) 17% Significant correlation between CES-D and SGRQ scores COPD = 36% vs. control = 6% (p < 0.0001) 23.8% Significant correlation between PHQ-9 and CAT scores COPD = 55% vs. healthy control = 30% (p < 0.05) OR = 2.7(COPD vs. control, p = 0.004) - 471 -

- The Korean Journal of Medicine: Vol. 83, No. 4, 2012 - Zung s Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) 20개의문항으로구성된자가보고형도구로초기연구에서우울증환자의증상평가에도움이되었고 [32] 일반인과우울증환자모두에게서높은내적일치도를보인다 ( 일반인 0.84, 우울증환자 0.77) [33,34]. 또한 BDI와도높은상관계수를보였다 (r = 0.72, p = 0.0001) [34]. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) 30개의문항으로구성된자가보고형도구로노인환자들을대상으로사용이된다. GDS는정상인과노인환자에서모두높은내적일치도를보이며 [41,44,45] 다른우울증선별도구인 BDI, SDS, CES-D, HRDS 등과도높은상관관계를보인다 [44,45]. 하지만연구마다다양한절단점을보인다 (Table 2). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 14개의문항으로구성된자가보고형도구로정상인, 우울장애환자, 불안장애환자를대상으로한연구에서내적일치도는 0.86, BDI 와의상관계수는 0.80이었다. 절단점을 8점으로할경우민감도는 89.2% 특이도는 82.5% 였다 [35]. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) 21개의항목으로구성된자가보고가가능한도구로여러집단을대상으로한연구에서모두높은내적일치도를보이고있다 [36-40]. 다만연구대상마다절단점값이차이가있어일반인을대상으로한경우에는 21점 [36], 다른연구에서는남자 23점, 여자 24점 [37] 이제시되었고일차진료의를찾아오는만성질환환자에서는 14점 [39] 이제시되었다. 정신과환자들의경우에도남자 23점, 여자 24점을제시한연구 [39] 와 22점을제시한연구 [40] 가있다. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) 9개의문항으로구성된자가보고형도구로정상인, 만성질환환자, 정신과외래환자들모두에서높은내적일치도를보이며절단점은 9점, 9.5점으로제시되고있다 [46,47]. 고찰본연구에서 COPD 환자의우울증유병률은 11.2% [16] 에서 55% [25] 까지다양하였지만 COPD 환자들은우울증의위험성이높은것으로조사되었다 [18-20,25]. 이러한유병률의차이는선택된문헌의연구방법의차이에기인한것으로생각되지만보다정확한유병률을구하기위한노력이필요할것이다. COPD 환자들에서우울증이잘동반되는이유로는환자들의나이, 폐기능, 연령과같은임상지표들보다는 COPD 자체의증상이나 COPD로인한삶의질저하등이우울증 Table 2. Depression screening instruments (translated into Korean) Items Cut-off point Sensitivity Specificity PPV Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 NR NR NR NR Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale 10 NR NR NR NR Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale a 20 25 (for patients) 21 (for epidemiology) 24 91.3% 95.7% 94%% 78.8% 69.5% 100% Zung s Self-Rating Depression a 20 SDS index: 56 76% 72% 93% Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale a 14 8 89.2% 82.5% NR Beck Depression Inventory a 21 14 23 (males)/24 (females) Geriatric Depression Scale a 30 18 10 19 Patient Health Questionnaire 9 a 9 9 9.5 NR, not reported; PPV, positive predictive value. a Self reported instrument. 77.7% 66.7% 65.6% 71.7% 91% 90.9% 85% 82.4% 82.9% 64.9% 60.6% 82% 87.0 % 52% NR 95.5 NR NR - 472 -

- Yong Il Hwang, et al. Screening for depression in COPD - 발생에더욱기여하는것으로알려져있다 [18,49]. 또한우울증은 COPD 환자들의삶의질에나쁜영향을끼쳐 [23,24] COPD 환자들은일반인들보다심리적인고통을더많이겪고있다 [21]. 실제로 2010년국내에서시행된실태조사결과를보면우울증이동반이될경우 COPD Assessment Test (CAT) 로측정한삶의질평가에서 97.9% 의환자들이 CAT 점수가 10점이상으로삶의질에나쁜영향을받는것으로조사되었다 [14,24]. 따라서 COPD 환자들에게서우울증은중요한문제이며우울증의조기발견과치료를위한노력이필요하다. 일반인들에게일률적인우울증선별검사가우울증의진단, 치료, 예후에큰영향을끼치지는않지만 [50], 영국의 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) 지침에서만성질환이동반된환자들에게우울증치료를강조하고있고 [15], 미국의 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 에서도우울증발견후진단, 치료, 추적관찰이가능할경우에는일반성인에서도우울증선별검사를권장하고있으므로 [51] COPD 환자들에게우울증선별검사를시행하는것이필요할것이다. COPD와같은만성질환환자들에게서정확한우울증의진단은중요한문제이다. 하지만신경정신과의사들이아닌의사들이우울증을진단하는것은쉽지않다. 일차진료의들을대상으로한연구에서만성질환이동반된환자들에게서우울증을진단할수있는확률은 23% 로만성질환이없을경우의 94% 와큰차이를보인다 [52]. 따라서우울증발견을위한적절한선별검사의사용이필요하다. 영국의 NICE 지침에서는 13가지의선별검사도구를제시하고있으며각도구는모두비슷한진단적정확도를보이고있으며 [15] 어떤한도구가다른도구보다우월하다는연구는없다 [50]. 본연구에서는우울증선별검사도구중한글로번역이되어있는 8개도구의신뢰도, 타당도를조사하였다. 한글화된각각의도구들은 10-30개의문항으로이루어져있었으며모두높은내적일치도를보이고있다. 자가기입이가능한 6개의도구들은모두비슷한정도의민감도와특이도를보이고있다 (Table 2). 한글화된도구들은한가지도구를여러연구자가서로다르게번역하거나연구에따라서는우울증진단의황금률 (Golden Standard) 이불명확한경우가있기는하나일선진료현장에서사용하는데는무리가없을것으로판단된다. 국내와같이바쁜외래진료환경을고려하면환자의자가기입이가능하고문항수가상대적으로적은 선별도구의사용이유리할것으로생각된다. 결론적으로 COPD 환자에서우울증은흔한동반질환이고 COPD가있을경우우울증의발생또한높아진다. 우울증이동반이될경우 COPD 환자의삶의질은더욱나쁘게되므로 COPD 환자에게우울증선별검사가필요하다. 우울증선별검사도구중한글화되어있는도구는 8가지가있으며각각의도구는비슷한정도의신뢰도와타당도를가진다. 우울증의선별을위해서한글화된 8가지도구도사용이모두가능하나문항수가적고환자의자가기입이가능한도구가현재의진료현실에서는적합할것으로생각된다. 요약목적 : 우울증은 COPD 환자들에게흔하게동반되는질환이다. 하지만현재 COPD 환자들에게우울증의선별검사의효과와선별검사를무슨도구로시행해야하는지알려진바가전혀없는실정이다. 이에체계적문헌고찰을통해 COPD 환자의우울증선별검사효과와도구에대해서알아보고자하였다. 방법 : COPD 환자에서우울증선별검사효과와우울증진단도구로일차진료의가선별검사목적으로사용할수있는것이어느것인지알아보기위해 COPD 환자에게우울증선별검사를하는것이필요한가? 와 우울증진단도구중, 일선진료의의선별검사목적으로권장할만한것은무엇인가? 라는두가지핵심질문을선정하고이에대한답을구하고자하였다. 문헌검색을위한데이터베이스로는국내의경우국내의학학술지초록검색 (kmbase.medric.or.kr), 학술연구정보서비스 (www.riss.kr), 코리아메드 (www.koreamed.org) 를이용하였고국외의경우는 Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library 를이용하였다. 결과 : COPD가있을경우우울증의발생또한높아진다. 우울증이동반이될경우 COPD 환자들이삶의질에나쁜영향을받았다. 우울증선별검사도구중한글화되어있는도구는 8가지가있으며각도구는비슷한정도의신뢰도와타당도를가진다. 결론 : COPD 환자에서우울증의선별검사는필요하며우울증선별을위해서한글화된 8가지도구사용이모두가능하다. 그중에서문항수가적고환자의자가기입이가능한도구가현재의진료현실에서는적합할것으로생각된다. - 473 -

- 대한내과학회지 : 제 83 권제 4 호통권제 626 호 2012 - 감사의글 본연구는보건복지부보건의료연구개발사업의지원에의하여이루어진것임 ( 과제고유번호 : A102065). 중심단어 : 만성폐쇄성폐질환 ; COPD; 우울증 ; 선별검사 REFERENCES 1. Rayner L, Price A, Evans A, Valsraj K, Higginson IJ, Hotopf M. Antidepressants for depression in physically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD007503. 2. Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. DiabetesCare 2001;24:1069-1078. 3. Hotopf M, Chidgey J, Addington-Hall J, Ly KL. Depression in advanced disease: a systematic review part 1. prevalence and case finding. Palliat Med 2002;16:81-97. 4. Thombs BD, Bass EB, Ford DE, et al. Prevalence of depression in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:30-38. 5. Reijnders JS, Ehrt U, Weber WE, Aarsland D, Leentjens AF. A systematic review of prevalence studies of depression in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2008;23:183-189. 6. DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2101-2107. 7. Jiang W, Alexander J, Christopher E, et al. Relationship of depression to increased risk of mortality and rehospitalization in patients with congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1849-1856. 8. Cook JA, Grey D, Burke J, et al. Depressive symptoms and AIDS-related mortality among a multisite cohort of HIVpositive women. Am J Public Health 2004;94:1133-1140. 9. Schulz R, Bookwala J, Knapp JE, Scheier M, Williamson GM. Pessimism, age, and cancer mortality. Psychol Aging 1996;11:304-309. 10. Peterson RA, Kimmel PL, Sacks CR, Mesquita ML, Simmens SJ, Reiss D. Depression, perception of illness and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. Int J Psychiatry Med 199121:343-354. 11. Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F, Talajic M. Depression following myocardial infarction: impact on 6-month survival. JAMA 1993;270:1819-1825. 12. House A, Knapp P, Bamford J, Vail A. Mortality at 12 and 24 months after stroke may be associated with depressive symptoms at 1 month. Stroke 2001;32:696-701.13. 13. Yoo KH, Kim YS, Sheen SS, et al. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Korea: the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008. Respirology 2011;16:659-665. 14. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevent of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [Internet]: the Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GOLD), 2011 [cited 2012 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org. 15. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem: treatment and management: national clinical practice guideline no. 91 [Internet]. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence, 2009 [cited 2012 Apr 20]. Available from: http//www.nice. org.uk. 16. Julian LJ, Gregorich SE, Earnest G, et al. Screening for depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD 2009;6:452-458. 17. Lamers F, Jonkers CC, Bosma H, Penninx BW, Knottnerus JA, van Eijk JT. Summed score of the patient health questionnaire-9 was a reliable and valid method for depression screening in chronically ill elderly patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:679-687. 18. Zhang MW, Ho RC, Cheung MW, Fu E, Mak A. Prevalence of depressive symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2011;33:217-223. 19. Egede LE. Major depression in individuals with chronic medical disorders: prevalence, correlates and association with health resource utilization, lost productivity and functional disability. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2007;29:409-416. 20. Wilhelm K, Mitchell P, Slade T, Brownhill S, Andrews G. Prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV major depression in an Australian national survey. J Affect Disorder 2003;75: 155-162. 21. Wagena EJ, Arrindell WA, Wouters EF, van Schayck CP. Are patients with COPD psychologically distressed? Eur Respir J 2005;26:242-248. 22. Chin HJ, Lee KH, Park CS, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of depression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tuberc Respir Dis 200865:191-197. 23. Ryu YJ, Chun EM, Sim YS, Lee JH. Depression and anxiety in outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tuberc Respir Dis 2007;62:11-18. 24. Hwang YI, Lee YS, Oh YM, et al. Prevalence of depression and its influence on health-related quality of life in COPD patients. Chest 2011;140:542A. 25. Ryu YJ, Chun EM, Lee JH, Chang JH. Prevalence of - 474 -

- 황용일외 6 인. COPD 환자에서우울증선별검사 - depression and anxiety in outpatients with chronic airway lung disease. Korean J Intern Med 2010;25:51-57. 26. Yi JS, Bae SO, Ahn YM, et al. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Hamilton depression rating scale (K-HDRS). J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2005;44: 456-465. 27. Ahn YM. Lee KY, Yi JS, et al. A validation study of the Korean -version of the Montgomery- Asberg depression rating scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2005;44: 466-476. 28. Chon KK, Rhee MK. Preliminary development of Korean version of CES-D. Korean J Clin Psychol 1992;11:65-76. 29. Shin SC, Kim MK, Yun KS, et al. The center for epidemiologic studies-depressionscale: its use in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1991;30:752-767. 30. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Diagnostic validity of the CES-D (Korean version) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1993;32:381-399. 31. Chon KK, Kwon KD, Kim SK. An attempt to re-vise the korean adaptation of the CES-D. J Soc Sci Research 1999;6: 429-451. 32. Song OH. A study of the self-rating depression scale (SDS) on psychiatric out-clinic patients. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1977;16:84-93. 33. Lee JH. Development of the Korean form of Zung s self-rating depression scale. Yeungnam Univ J Med 1995; 12:292-305. 34. Shin HC, Kim CH, Park YW, et al. Validity of Zung's self-rating depression scale: detection of depression in primary care. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2000;21:1317-1330. 35. Oh SM, Min KJ, Park DB. A study on the standardization of the hospital anxiety and depression scale for Koreans: a comparison of normal, depressed and anxious groups. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1999;38:289-296. 36. Hahn HM, Yum TH, Shin YW, Kim KH, Yoon DJ, Chung KJ. A standardization study of beck depression inventory in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1986;25:487-500. 37. Rhee MK, Lee YH, Park SH, et al. A standardization study of beck depression inventory I-Korean version (K-BDI): reliability and factor analysis. Korean J Psychopathol 1995; 4:77-95. 38. Rhee MK, Lee YH, Jung HY, et al. A standardization study of beck depression inventory 2-Korean version (K-BDI): validity. Korean J Psychopathol 1995;4:96-104. 39. Shin HC, Kim CH, Park YW, et al. Validity of beck depression inventory (BDI): detection of depressio in primary care. J Korean Acad Fam Med 200021:1451-1465. 40. Sung HM, Kim JB, Park YN, Bai DS, Lee SH, Ahn HN. A study on the reliability and the validity of Korean version of the beck depression inventory-ii (BDI-II). J Korean Soc Biol Ther Psychiatry 2008;14:201-212. 41. Kee BS, Lee CW. A preliminary study for the standardization of geriatric depression scale in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1995;34:1875-1885. 42. Kee BS. A preliminary study for the standardization of geriatric depression scale short form-korean version. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1996;35:298-307. 43. Jung IK, Kwak DI, Joe SH, Lee HS. A preliminary study on standaridization of Korean form of geriatric depression scale (KGDS). J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1998;37: 340-351. 44. Jung IK, Kwak DI, Shin DK, Lee MS, Lee HS, Kim JY. A reliability and validity study of geriatric depression scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1997;36:103-112. 45. Cho MJ, Bae JN, Suh GH, et al. Validation of geriatric depression scale, Korean version (GDS) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1999;38:48-63. 46. Choi HS, Choi JH, Park KH, et al. Standardization of the Korean version of patient health questionnaire-9 as a screening instrument for major depressive disorder. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2007;28:114-119. 47. Lim KH, Park YN, Kim DH, Shin IH, Lee WS, Kim JB. A preliminary study of the standardization of the Korean version of the patient health questionnaire-9. Korean J Health Promot Dis Prev 2009;9:275-280. 48. Cho HJ, Chae JH, Jun TY. The overview of clinical assessment tools for depression. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assc 2007;46:110-121. 49. Hanania NA, Müllerova H, Locantore NW, et al. Determinants of depression in the ECLIPSE chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183:604-611. 50. Gilbody S, Sheldon T, House A. Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008; 178:997-1003. 51. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression in adults: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:784-792. 52. Bridges KW, Goldberg DP. Somatic presentation of DSM III psychiatric disorders in primary care. J Psychosom Res 1985;29:563-569. - 475 -