205.fm

Similar documents
10(3)-09.fm

304.fm

50(1)-09.fm

10(3)-12.fm

51(2)-09.fm

605.fm

50(5)-07.fm

< DC1A4C3A5B5BFC7E22E666D>

14.531~539(08-037).fm

10(3)-10.fm

11(5)-12(09-10)p fm

50(6)-03.fm

16(1)-3(국문)(p.40-45).fm

69-1(p.1-27).fm

10(3)-02.fm

12.077~081(A12_이종국).fm

19(1) 02.fm

9(3)-4(p ).fm

<30332DB9E8B0E6BCAE2E666D>

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

50(6)-04.fm

07.051~058(345).fm

49(4)-07.fm

82-01.fm

12(3) 10.fm

untitled

27(5A)-07(5806).fm

w w l v e p ƒ ü x mw sƒw. ü w v e p p ƒ w ƒ w š (½kz, 2005; ½xy, 2007). ù w l w gv ¾ y w ww.» w v e p p ƒ(½kz, 2008a; ½kz, 2008b) gv w x w x, w mw gv

16(2)-7(p ).fm

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

15.101~109(174-하천방재).fm

416.fm

<30312DC0CCC7E2B9FC2E666D>

07.045~051(D04_신상욱).fm

51(4)-13.fm

202.fm

8(2)-4(p ).fm

06.177~184(10-079).fm

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

17.393~400(11-033).fm

14(4)-14(심고문2).fm

14.091~100(328-하천방재).fm

49(6)-06.fm

12(4) 10.fm

26(3D)-17.fm

, 66~67dB»e 55dB š 12dBù û»e(65db) w 70~71dB ñ. ù ü»» 35dB(ü), 45dB() r. w» w 1938 œk ³Ø w, 1960 Ø, 1968 ³Ø w. w 1972 ³Ø w w ³ ƒwš, ù y Ø w ³w

12(2)-04.fm

10(1)-08.fm

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

10.063~070(B04_윤성식).fm

<312D303128C1B6BAB4BFC1292E666D>

14(4) 09.fm

4.fm

04-46(1)-06(조현태).fm

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

82.fm

(5차 편집).hwp

15(2)-07.fm

49(6)-10.fm

m, w, w w. xœ y t y w en, ùw,, ƒ y (, 1994; w, 2000). ƒ x œ (NGA; National Geospatial-intelligence Agency) t t wù x (VITD; Vector product Interim Terr

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

201.fm

Microsoft Word - KSR2012A038.doc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

<353420B1C7B9CCB6F52DC1F5B0ADC7F6BDC7C0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120BEC6B5BFB1B3C0B0C7C1B7CEB1D7B7A52E687770>

untitled

50(2)-07.fm

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

32(4B)-04(7455).fm

3-15(3)-05(이주희).fm

14.fm

29(4)-07(김봉채).fm

fm

11(4)-03(김태림).fm

14(2) 02.fm

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

01.01~08(유왕진).fm

w wƒ ƒw xù x mw w w w w. x¾ w s³ w» w ƒ z š œ Darcy-Weisbach œ w ù, ù f Reynolds (ε/d) w w» rw rw. w w š w tx x w. h L = f --- l V 2 Darcy Weisbach d

31(3B)-07(7055).fm

143.fm


50(4)-10.fm

8-15(3)-02(손태근).fm

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

< C0E5BFC1C0E72E666D>

27(5A)-15(5868).fm

100(4)-24(90).fm

fm

11(5)-7(09-37)p fm

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

11(1)-15.fm

Transcription:

Jour. Korean Earth Science Society, v. 31, no. 2, p. 164 171, April 2010 (w ) 3D v y w w w z - w 2w - ù Á Á * w w, 361-763, 410 The Effects of Science Instructions Applying 3D Planetarium Software - using the unit Earth and Star for the 8th grade - Jae-Joon Na, Jong-Bum Park, and Dong-Sik Kook* Department of Earth Science Education, Chungbuk National University, Chungbuk 361-763, Korea Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of instruction applying 3D Planetarium Software (Starry Night Pro 6.0) in terms of the learners science achievement, changes of attitude (attitude toward science as well as scientific attitude), and self-directed learning ability. Participants were 198 8 th graders. This study adopted a quasiexperimental research design in which experimental group was taught with 3D planetarium software vs. control group with traditional lecture-centered teaching method for 6 hours. The effects were investigated by independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test The results are as follows. The instruction using 3D planetarium software was more effective than the traditional lecture-centered curriculum in science achievement and self-directed learning ability.however, there were not meaningful differences in analyzing attitudes related science, the results that were so effective in elevation for self-directed learning could be gained. Students were interested in instruction applying 3D planetarium software, which was helpful for them to understand the content knowledge. Results showed that instruction with 3D planetarium software applied was effective in 8 th grade science learning.,fzxpset Earth and Star, Science Instructions, 3D planetarium software : w 2w w w 3D v (Starry Night pro 6.0) y w w z w w, w k,» w e w w w z w. w 2w 198 w 6 3D v (Starry Night pro 6.0) y w w z w» z mw w z w. t t- t t- w w., 3D v y w m w w z ƒ ùkû (p<.05). ù 3D v y w w k e z w z ƒ ùkû (p>.05),» w w z (p<.05). 3D planetarium software y w 8w w z. š ó eš., w w, 3D v k vp w w w ù x w w *Corresponding author: kookds@chungbuk.ac.kr *Tel: 82-43-261-2738 *Fax: 82-43-271-0526 y š, w y y ƒ w š w. ù Áœ w x ù w y w w (, 1999). wš xw w w w z»

% v y w ww z w w 165. x w š w t w Ï k w k ƒ wš y w w w» w» z e w w w w k (wk, 1998). ful y»» x x v ù, x x v y š (½ ³ k, 2002). ful» ful x ƒ w, ful š y w y w y ƒ j (Choi, 2001). w ful y w w y w x w y w w z š w (Hooper and Hannafin, 1991). f ul mw w w w w w w ful w 70% y wš š w (Lehman, 1994). w w ƒ š y k š k, w w š w (Njoo and Jong, 1993). w y x» w, y x, SF(science fiction) y y w w w w xk p y w š. ù x x š p w Á œ š ƒ w gld š w w 2 ù w txw eš. 3 œ ƒ x» w. 3 œ tx w 3D v y w w wš w. 3D v y w w, w, w y š,, y w. w p ƒ» w x y mw tx w ƒ z w w y» w. w 2w w y w š ƒ vp wš, w y gld yw x(learning Cycle Model) w -w w x w w w w k š» w e z. û ü ew G w 2w 6w ûw x 3w 99 m 3w 99 w. - z m (pre-posttest control group design)» w 3D v y w x, m m ù x w. w x m w w w w k,» w w z, 3 r 3D v Starry Night pro 6.0 y w 2 w x m w w 1 6 w. w 2009 3 w ƒ w sƒ w w. 6 x, m w z w k w mw. š z, w w w k y» w» w z w. w k Fraser(1978) w TOSRA(Test of Science Related Attitudes). TOSRA w (x, 1993) k w w k 7ƒ w 70 w ƒƒ 35 w ù Á z y w.» w (2003)ƒ w Áš w» w w. Á z w w.

166 ù Á Á Study process Experiment O 1 X 1 O 3 Control O 2 O 4 O 1, O 2: Pre-inspection(w, w k,» w ) O 3: Post-inspection(w, w k,» w, ) O 4: Post-inspection(w, w k,» w ) X 1: Teaching by using 3D Planetarium Software(3D v y ) Fig. 1. study plan. x m Á z mw 3D v y z» w w (Fig. 1). x m ƒƒ w k» w w z x 3D v y ew š, m m ww. x e z x m ƒƒ w w k» w w š, x 3D v y w w w. 3D v z w 2w w III. 6 (1 - k, 2Á3 -k, 4 -, 5 -, 6 - w) w z yw x w ƒ w w 6 -w 3D v w. w w š w., w s w w ü ƒ e» w w ü ƒ? (2003) w w ü w x, œ ƒ w w ü» w ¾., v š, w, w» w œ w» w x., 3D v x ƒ w w ƒ? 3D v w w w ü w txw. 3D v w ü ƒ w z xw ý w., w k ƒ? w ü z óù w w k w w» w w. w 2w w ü. t ƒ wš, j» d w w. ƒ» w dwš, ƒ k w w. k k w,, w, x p w.»q w.» ùkü w w. p w. w j» w. š (Fig. 2). w (1999) w w (III) ü. w ü ƒ l ƒ mw w wš, x w j» d w w.» j» d w x x w ü w z, j» d y j w., j» d m l d w» w š w w. k k w p, w k w dw»z œw., k d w w w w., l w k k w k w p

% v y w ww z w w 167 Fig. 2. conceptual structure of the unit Earth and Star. w. w» w dwš, 2-3ƒ t» ƒ w w.» ww w.»» ùkü» w w w,. w, wwš, w p w. w w w, wù. y w š w w w w.,»q ww t»q» mw w. œ» w, w ƒ lr š w ü ƒ z xw ý 3D v š w Imaginova Starry Night pro 6.0 v w w w. Starry Night pro x ful v w x, ú w. w ƒ w w r» ƒ l w ¾ w y w vp. Starry Night pro š w 3 e ùký.» ƒ v w w ü w œ x w z ùký. 1 k w ü w k e w w, w ùkù w. w t ƒ j p j l y w š, t e t û wš»ƒ» w y k (Fig. 3). k t p ùkù. w w x» k w y k. k» ùkù d y v NASA, g ù» ƒ w (Fig. 4). 2, 3 k w ü k š w ƒ¾ w w ƒƒ w w t p. w k w t w š, w œ k

168 ù Á Á Fig. 3. Features of the surface of the moon. Fig. 4. Sun s surface (left) and total eclipse (right). Fig. 5. Revolution orbit of planet and Mars surface. k w œ ƒ. š ƒ k» w s ƒ¾ k k œ w ƒ w (Fig. 5). (2003) k w Áš w w j» w w w ƒ š ùkû. Starry Night pro» v» w

% v y w ww z w w 169 Fig. 6. The surface of Mars and Saturn. Fig. 7. Comet and Asteroid. j» w w ƒ. w k j»ƒ w w ¾ ù k ¾ ƒ w š w j ƒ ù (Fig. 6). j ƒ k w x k w k t w Õ ƒ ¼ ùkù w, x w w k r Õ ƒ ùkù x ƒ w. w ³ew y ƒ w,» w w w 2 txw. ù» w 3 e, k œ w ƒ (Fig. 7). 7 8w ( w 2w ) w 3D v y w w w, w w k,» w w w z wš w., w w e w w w e» w Á z w w w. z 30 w 30 w š ùkû (Table 1). l ƒƒ 99 w s³ m x ƒƒ 20.70 19.94 š, t r ƒƒ 4.858 6.032 x j ùkû, w w x j

170 ù Á Á Table 1. The result of pre-posttest of science achievement Inspection Pre Post **p<0.01 N Mean SD t p Control 99 20.70 4.858 0.973 0.332 Experiment 99 19.94 6.032 Control 99 7.73 3.455 3.589 0.000** Experiment 99 9.41 3.153 Table 2. The result of pre-posttest of science related attitude N Pretest Posttest Mean SD Mean SD Control 99 103.38 8.813 106.59 12.469 Experiment 99 104.69 10.703 107.33 12.150 Total 198 104.04 9.76 106.96 12.31 Table 3. The result of pretest of science related attitude Inspection pre N Mean SD t p Control 99 103.38 8.813 Experiment 99 104.69 10.703 0.935 0.351 ùkû. ù s³ w ƒ š w. w, z m x s³ ƒƒ 7.73 9.41 x 1.68 ù kû, t r ƒƒ 3.455 3.153 m j ùkû. ù kû t 3.589, p 0.000 ùkù w z w e w ƒ ùkû. 3D v y ew m w w ƒ 3D v y w w z., w k e w k w e» w Á z w k w. Á z w, 35 w 175 w. m 3D v y Á z w k (Table 2). m w m s³ 103.38, 3D v y Table 4. The result of pre-posttest of self controlled learning ability N Pretest w x 104.69. z m s³ 3.20, x 2.65 w m s³ w. t t- t 0.935 š, p 0.351 (p<0.05) ùkù ƒ, w k ƒ š w (Table 3).,» w e» w w e» w Á z» w w. Á z w, 45 w 225 w. m 3D v y Á z» w (Table 4). m w m s³ 138.53, 3D v y w x 133.01. z m s³ 1.93, x 6.99 w x s³ w. t t- t 2.040 š, p 0.113 (p<0.05) ùkù ƒ,» w ƒ š w (Table 5). Posttest Mean SD Mean SD Control 99 138.53 19.274 140.455 17.350 Experiment 99 133.01 18.760 140 17.998 Total 198 135.77 19.02 140.23 17.67 Table 5. The result of pretest of self controlled learning ability Inspection Pre N Mean SD t p Control 99 138.53 19.274 2.040 0.113 Experiment 99 133.01 18.760 w 2w w 3D v y w w

% v y w ww z w w 171 z w, w k,» w. ¾ w., 3D v y w w e z w, x m s³ 1.68 ùkûš, m w z ƒ ùkû (p<0.000)., 3D v y w w k j w., 3D v y» w w z ƒ ùkû., 3D v y w w w w ü ww š, ƒ š w.. 3D v y w w wé k k w w w, w y» ƒ jš, y wš t, w mww y w z w. š x p w Áw y w w. p y w w z z p y w x Á v œw w ƒ. w p w Áw y yw w w x,» mw z w v w. š x, 1999, w w (III).,, 140 p. ½ ³, k, 2002, wk ƒ e z. wz, 23, 49-69.,, xû, Ÿ, 2003, d - m, w,» w. w š, RR2003-15-03, 145 p., 2003, k w Áš w. w w, 34 p. wk, 1998, w w w p l. œ w w, 24 p. x, 1993, Á Áš w w w w k. w w wz, 17, 85-92. Choi, W., 2001, Critical design considerations for effective computer-based instructional simulation. Educational Technology International, 3, 147-175. Fraser, B.J., 1978, Test of Science-Related Attitude. Science Education, 62, 509-515. Hooper, S. and Hannafin, M.J., 1991, The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 27-40. Lehman, J.R., 1994, Secondary science teachers use of microcomputers during instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 413-420. Njoo, M. and Jong, T., 1993, Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instructional support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 821-844. 2010 2 23 2010 4 7 š 2010 4 20 k