歯표지.PDF

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "歯표지.PDF"

동신 요
7 years ago
Views:

2 LG

3 < > %,, OECD 596%, 566%OECD (GDI; Gender-related Development Index) 14629, (GEM; Gender Employ-ment Measure) (, ),, (, ),, % 350% 461% 269% (M), % 10300

(GEM; Gender Employ-ment Measure) 66 61 (,

4 300 53%p % 276% % " ",

5 < > < >

6 < > < I-1> (2002)1 < I-2>, < I-3>, < I-4> (2000)3 < I-5> (GDI) 4 < I-6> (GEM) 4 < I-7> 5 < I-8> 7 < II-1>, (1999)9 < II-2>, (1998)10 < II-3> (1998)10 < II-4> 11 < II-5> 12 < III-1> GDP 14 < III-2> 15 < III-3> 16 < III-4> (TFR) 16 < III-5> (2001~2010)17 < III-6> (1999~2010)17 < III-7> 100 (1996~2000)20 < III-8> 21 < IV-1> IBM 22 < IV-2> Deloitte-Touche 23 < IV-3> 27 <II-1> 9

III-1> GDP 14 < III-2> 15 < III-3> 16 < III-4> (TFR) 16 < III-5> (2001~2010)17 < III-6>

7 I 1, OECD, %,, OECD 596% 1970 < I-1> *(2002) ( : %) OECD 596 : * 15 ~ 64 (%) : OECD, Education at a Glance(2003), (Tertiary education) %OECD 481% 1

8 OECD < I-2>, 2000* ( : %) OECD 481 : * 1999 : OECD, Education at a Glance(2002) < I-3>, 2000* ( : %) OECD ~64 35~54 25~34 ( ) : OECD, Education at a Glance(2002) %OECD 714%, 689%, 668%, 2

%) 402 475 309 OECD 531 446 156 55~64 35~54 25~34 ( ) :

9 349% OECD 112% 3 < I-4> *(2000) ( : %p) OECD : * 25 ~ 54 ; = - : OECD, Education at a Glance(2002),, 20% 2 (GDI; Gender- 3

10 related Development Index) 14629, (GEM; Gender Employment Measure)6661, (, ),, (, ) < I-5> (GDI) Rank : GDI(Gender-related Development Index),, : Human Development Report 2002, UNDP < I-6> (GEM) Rank : GEM(Gender Employment Measure),, : Human Development Report 2002, UNDP 4

Index),, : Human Development Report 2002, UNDP 1 08 06 < I-6> (GEM) Rank 1 3 7 8 10 11 13 16 23 31

11 3, , < I-7> 1960~ Cost Case Convenience Case Token Case Business Case 1~2, : Token( ) Case :,,

12 4 20, / (work/family balance) EU / / / / / - : 20 Initiative - : 80 - : 50 - : 50 - : 90 - : / - - / - (12-18 ), , (13) / /, -, -, / / - -, - - -,,,,,,, ( ) 5 (wwwrecruitcokr) 127% (402%), (395%), (324%), (244%) (54%), (57%),, 6

(12-18 ), + 11 -, - 1-3 (13) - - - / /, -, -, / / - -, - - -,,,,,,, (

13 (36%) < I-8> ( : %) IT : : wwwrecruitcokr < > A ( : %) / : A 7

14 ,, 25~35,,,,,,, Minority 1, % 350% 8

15 461% 269% < II-1> ( :%) : 4 :, (2003) < II-1>, (100%=134,695) (100%=123,431) : 4 :, (2003) 2 2, 24~35 9

16 M (M) (%) 120 < II-2>, (2001) ~19 20~24 25~29 30~34 35~39 40~44 45~49 50~54 55~59 60~64 : ILO, Yearbook of Labour Statistics(2002) < II-3> (2001) (%) ~19 20~24 25~29 30~34 35~39 40~44 45~49 50~54 55~59 60~64 : ILO, Yearbook of Labour Statistics(2002) % 10

< II-3> (2001) (%) 120 90 60 30 0 15~19 20~24 25~29 30~34 35~39 10 6

17 < II-4> ( : %) ( 276) ( 164) ( 241) ( 154) 25~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : 25~54 : 3, 11

18 < II-5> ; : ILO, Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling(2001); 383% :, 2000, 12

19 13,,

20 1 21 (pool),, GDP (GDI) 1 < III-1> GDP GDP(logged) : GDI(Gender-related Development Index) : UNDP, Human Development Report,

21 < III-2> - Affirmative Action,,,,, - - ( 6 ),

22 (%) 80 < III-3> (%) () () : (0~14 ) (65 ), =(65 ) / (0~14 )100 : (30 )336, (08), (07), (08) () < III-4> (TFR) : (Total Fertility Rate, TFR) : 16

23 , %p < III-5> (2001~2010) 100%=5, %=2, ( :, %) & / & %=2, :,,, Bloomberg,, < III-6> (1999~2010*) ( : %) %pt %pt (E) (E) : * 15 ; %, % :,,, Bloomberg,, 17

24 3,,, (War for talent) (Congressional Commission on Advancing Women), 4, 18

25 19, Catalyst, 85% 5

26 21 6 P&G 7~8 14 < III-7> 100 *(1996~2000) (%, ) % % : * : Catalyst, Fortune, 20

27 100 10% 276% % "" 100,000 < III-8> ( ) 80,000 60,000 40,000 20, : 2001 : US Census Bureau 21

28 1 IBM IBM 1994, IBM 32% 20%, IBM (TF) ' ' %, 235% < IV-1> IBM - IBM (Gerstner) IBM IBM - IBM80 ~ 90 - IBM,

29 2 Deloitte-Touche, (Women s Initiative) < IV-2> Deloitte-Touche - (Deloitte) (Women s Initiative) : - - ( - T/F team, ) 10 5% 14% 25% 18%

30 , MSD - (230) (114) ,230 HSBC (61%) - 40%,, &, 24

31 , 1, 25

32 ,, 2 - Top Management - - IT,,, R&D, Staff - (,,, ) -, Mento,, - - Gap 26

33 , < IV-3> ( ) ( ) ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :,

34 28 3,, 25-34

35 29,

±§ 60¡ÿ ‚±‚ ‰«•¡ˆ

±§ 60¡ÿ ‚±‚ ‰«•¡ˆ 여성고용정책을 통해 본 장애인고용정책의 시사점 이 금 진(기초연구팀) I. 검토 배경 최근 우리나라에서도 교과서의 단일민족 이라는 용어가 차별로 인식될 만큼 다 양성 다문화 에 대한 관심이 증가됨 농촌지역을 중심으로 외국계 여성과의 혼인율이 35.9%로 이 늘어나고 있으며 (통계청, 2006), 코시안(Kosian)을 비롯하여 다양한 혼혈자녀, 외국인 노동자

歯표지.PDF

歯표지.PDF