case

Similar documents
ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식3)

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

Manufacturing6

untitled

歯CRM개괄_허순영.PDF

15_3oracle

F1-1(수정).ppt

Microsoft PowerPoint - 3.공영DBM_최동욱_본부장-중소기업의_실용주의_CRM

untitled

1.장인석-ITIL 소개.ppt

untitled

I 1 1) TESCO, 1993, ( 96, 98, 99) - : : 354 (19993 ~ , 1 =1737 ) - : 845 ( : 659 ) - : ) CM 9 (CM), CM , 2 CM, -

슬라이드 제목 없음


untitled

BSC Discussion 1

Agenda I. What is SRM? II. Why SRM? Trend, III. Function / To-be - IV. V. Critical Success Factor 2

Oracle Apps Day_SEM

SW¹é¼Ł-³¯°³Æ÷ÇÔÇ¥Áö2013

°í¼®ÁÖ Ãâ·Â

삼성SDI_SR국문_최종

LAYOUT 설계 컨설팅 제안서

정진명 남재원 떠오르고 있다. 배달앱서비스는 소비자가 배달 앱서비스를 이용하여 배달음식점을 찾고 음식 을 주문하며, 대금을 결제까지 할 수 있는 서비 스를 말한다. 배달앱서비스는 간편한 음식 주문 과 바로결제 서비스를 바탕으로 전 연령층에서 빠르게 보급되고 있는 반면,

2013<C724><B9AC><ACBD><C601><C2E4><CC9C><C0AC><B840><C9D1>(<C6F9><C6A9>).pdf

歯목차45호.PDF

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

Main Title

001지식백서_4도

PMP수험서_8-2쇄

슬라이드 1

ETL_project_best_practice1.ppt

03.Agile.key

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

, ( ) 1) *.. I. (batch). (production planning). (downstream stage) (stockout).... (endangered). (utilization). *

06_À̼º»ó_0929

歯3이화진

歯경영혁신 단계별 프로그램 사례.ppt

Service-Oriented Architecture Copyright Tmax Soft 2005

untitled

歯두산3.PDF

3Æí2Àå¨éÀç


Microsoft PowerPoint - 6.CRM_Consulting.ppt

1. BSC, Cycle [Uncertainty Issue], P What To Do? -, IT Process ing Issue ( Key Initiative) [Decision Making Issue] Workout -Brain Storming - Logic Tre

PBR PDF

untitled

02신현화

ePapyrus PDF Document

untitled

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

DW 개요.PDF

歯1.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

시안

example code are examined in this stage The low pressure pressurizer reactor trip module of the Plant Protection System was programmed as subject for

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

재영 솔루텍의 Vision 달성을 위하여…

<C7C1B7A3C2F7C0CCC1EE20B4BABAF1C1EEB4CFBDBA20B7B1C4AA20BBE7B7CA5FBCADB9CEB1B35F28C3D6C1BE292E687770>

OP_Journalism


Page 2 of 6 Here are the rules for conjugating Whether (or not) and If when using a Descriptive Verb. The only difference here from Action Verbs is wh

11¹Ú´ö±Ô

Buy one get one with discount promotional strategy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

_KF_Bulletin webcopy

Corporate PPT Template

이제는 쓸모없는 질문들 1. 스마트폰 열기가 과연 계속될까? 2. 언제 스마트폰이 일반 휴대폰을 앞지를까? (2010년 10%, 2012년 33% 예상) 3. 삼성의 스마트폰 OS 바다는 과연 성공할 수 있을까? 지금부터 기업들이 관심 가져야 할 질문들 1. 스마트폰은

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

02이승민선생_오라클.PDF

<31B1E8C0B1C8F128C6ED2E687770>

FMX M JPG 15MB 320x240 30fps, 160Kbps 11MB View operation,, seek seek Random Access Average Read Sequential Read 12 FMX () 2

학습영역의 Taxonomy에 기초한 CD-ROM Title의 효과분석

13 Who am I? R&D, Product Development Manager / Smart Worker Visualization SW SW KAIST Software Engineering Computer Engineering 3

,.,..,....,, Abstract The importance of integrated design which tries to i

Agenda 2

2011´ëÇпø2µµ 24p_0628

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

09김정식.PDF

정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제

엔젤입문 초급자과정

274 한국문화 73

20(53?)_???_O2O(Online to Offline)??? ???? ??.hwp

원고스타일 정의

<C1DF3320BCF6BEF7B0E8C8B9BCAD2E687770>

목차 1. 서론 1.1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1.2. 연구의 내용 및 방법 2. 제품스타일 분석 2.1. 제품이미지 2.2. 미래지향적 스타일 3. 신세대 감성분석 3.1. 라이프스타일 3.2. 광고전략 3.3. 색채에 따른 제품구매 분석 4. 결론 *참고문헌 ( )

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

제 출 문 문화체육관광부장관 귀하 본 보고서를 문화예술분야 통계 생산 및 관리 방안 연구결과 최종 보고서로 제출합니다. 2010년 10월 숙명여자대학교 산학협력단 본 보고서는 문화체육관광부의 공식적인 견해와 다를 수 있습니다

歯Final-Handout.PDF

Output file

Product A4

<30362E20C6EDC1FD2DB0EDBFB5B4EBB4D420BCF6C1A42E687770>

about_by5

애경은 사랑과 존경의 마음으로 변하지 않는 가치를 만들어 갑니다 우리는 지난 60여 년의 역사를 자양분으로 어떤 외풍에도 흔들리지 않을 단단한 뿌리를 내렸습니다. 때로는 곧게, 때로는 넓게 뻗어낸 뿌리는 그만큼 굳건한 줄기를 길러냈습니다. 매년 풍성한 과실을 얻을 수

<C1B6BBE7BFACB1B D303428B1E8BEF0BEC B8F1C2F7292E687770>


untitled

카테고리 시리즈 명 SME 컨텐트 에센스 심화 컨텐트 탬플릿 평가 대 분 류 중 분 류 개수 평균 시간 개수 총 시간 개수 총 시간 유 형 개수 유무 경영일반 경영기법 Performance Management를 위한 전략적 성과면담 김정일 20 0:43:09 8 6:3

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

PJTROHMPCJPS.hwp

Transcription:

Phil Seong Moon / PMP webmaster@ccpm.co.kr

"Convergence Lean Six Sigma Six Sigma, "

- -,, - - - - -, -

Needs - - - / - - - (Synergy) - / - /

Complexity ERP Lean/TPS Lean/TPS CMMI CMMI Project Managem ment SCM CRM ABC/ABM ABC/ABM TS TS 16949 16949 TOC

: Allen Yurko, CEO, invensys plc Speed of Change

Complexity Problem Complexity Number of Devices/Users and Processes/Applications Complexity increases exponentially!

ASQ SSBOK ASQ Six Sigma BB Body of Knowledge Enterprise-Wide Deployment Business Process Management Project management Six Sigma Improvement Methodology and Tools - Define Six Sigma Improvement Methodology and Tools - Measure Six Sigma Improvement Methodology and Tools - Analyze Six Sigma Improvement Methodology and Tools - Improve Six Sigma Improvement Methodology and Tools - Control Lean Enterprise Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)

ASQ SSBOK ASQ Six Sigma BB Body of Knowledge III. Project Management A. Project charter and plan 1. Charter/plan elements Compare, select, and explain elements of a project's charter and plan. (analysis) 2. Planning tools 3. Project documentation 4. Charter negotiation B. Team leadership 1. Initiating teams 2. Selecting team members 3. Team stages C. Team dynamics and performance 1. Team-building techniques 2.Team facilitation techniques 3.Team performance evaluation 4. Team tools

ASQ SSBOK ASQ Six Sigma BB Body of Knowledge D. Change agent 1. Managing change 2. Organizational roadblocks 3. Negotiation and conflict resolution techniques 4. Motivation techniques 5. Communication 6. Management and Planning Tools VIII. Six Sigma Improvement Methodology and Tools - Control C. Lean tools for control Apply appropriate lean tools (e.g., 5S, visual factory, kaizen, kanban, poka-yoke, total productive maintenance, standard work) as they relate to the control phase of DMAIC (application) [NOTE: The use of lean tools in other areas of DMAIC is covered in section IX. C.]

ASQ SSBOK ASQ Six Sigma BB Body of Knowledge IX. Lean Enterprise A. Lean concepts 1. Theory of constraints Describe the theory of constraints 2. Lean thinking Describe concepts such as value, value chain, flow, pull, perfection, etc. 3. Continuous flow manufacturing (CFM) 4. Non-value-added activities 5. Cycle-time reduction Describe how cycle-time reduction can be used to identify defects and NVA activities using kaizen-type methods to reduce waste of space, inventory, labor, and distance. B. Lean tools Define, select, and apply tools such as visual factory, kanban, poka-yoke, standard work, SMED, etc., in areas outside of DMAIC-Control. [NOTE: The use of lean tools in DMAIC-Control is covered in section VIII. C.] C. Total productive maintenance (TPM) Understand the concept of TPM.

Project Definition Operations and projects differ primarily in that operations are ongoing and repetitive while projects are temporary and unique. A project can thus be defined in terms of its distinctive characteristics - a project is a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product or service. Temporary means that every project has a definite beginning and a definite end. Unique means that the product or service is different in some distinguishing way from all other products or services. From PMBOK, PMI

Generation I Six Sigma Generation II Six Sigma Generation III Six Sigma Generation IV Six Sigma Process Optimization Cost Reduction, Business Strategy Value Creation, Maximizing Power DMAIC DFSS New Methodology Y=f(x1, x2, x3, ) Quality/Statistical Analysis Change Acceleration Management System

Customer CTQs: Quality, Cost & Timely delivery Reduce Project Cost Reduce Maintenance Cost Increase Productivity Reduce Time To Market Reduce Life cycle Cost Strengthen Partnership Increase Reliability Reduce Response Time Increase Predictability

Lean Thinking Lean?

Lean Tools Speed Focus Focus Tools: Value Stream Mapping (VSM) Kaizen 5S Pull System / Kanban / JIT Jidoka SMED What else? X-Training

Job Summary Creation - After Lean START: ASSIGN J.ob Summary - Co-Located Team - Standard Processes One JS Owner INCORPORATE COMMENTS 12.5 DEVELOP BUBBLE CHART 8.1 CONFIRM W.B.S. WITH TEAM 2 PHASE CU S PER BUBBLE CHART 3 BUILD CU ASSYS 3 DEVELOP ALL PHASES F Phase PRIORITY 90 2 TECH REVIEW CONTRACT OR IN- HOUSE 30 STATUS ALL CU PH TO PRL.2 APS / ZM REVIEW 12.5 APPROVE SUMM & ALL CU PH.2 END PROCESS START: -LF TGI - PACKAGING PREP S/C PKG. 4 14 SHIP 3 CHECK 3 XFER 1 LLTM TO END USE 1 START SCHEDULING PROCESS UPDATE METRICS & HISTORY FILE Product Line History Cross-Functional Core Team START REMAINING JMLS 10 Self-Directed Reviews FILE STD. PACKAGE MATL SPECALIST COMPL JML LLTM CU PHASE.2 1.5 MATL SPECIALIST ISSUE LLTM JML 1.5 10 MATL PROCESS

Results of the Job Summary Lean Lean Current State Future State Potential Improvement Value Added Time (Days) 15 15 0% Non-Value Added Required 20 8 60% Wait Time (NVA) 62 3 95% Total Lead Time = 97 26 73% Travel Distance (Feet) 30,744 2,464 to 13,944 55 to 92% Process Steps 70 23 67% Hand-Offs 58 10 80% Primary Action: Co-located, Cross-functional Team, FIFO s replaced w/focused individual

Repair "Simplified" Value Stream Map - Current Lean - VSM Supplier (Customer) Value Stream Map - Existing Takt Time = 1 Week Customer 50 Breakers / Yr Rec / Inspect Time = 2 hrs Ship to Shop Time = 1 hr Waiting for Shop RIDL This loop happens up to 9 times per Breaker Time = 1hr Shop Inspect Waiting for Tech. Code Time = 2 hr Order Parts Time = 8 hrs Wait Repair Time = 34.5 hrs Wait Appendix A Time = 2 hrs Wait Wait Wait Reliability Time = 2 days Wait Wait Appendix B Time = 16 hrs Wait Wait Waiting for Paperwork Waiting for Parts 139 Inspect Time = 1 hr Wait Pack / Ship Time = 1 hr Wait Packaging Time = 2 hrs RFI Inventory Up to 30 Days 10 to 100 days 2 Days 3 Days 2 to 15 Days 3 Days 2 Days 2 Days 2 Hr 8 Hrs 34.5 Hrs 2 Hrs 2 Days 16 Hrs 1 Hr 1 Hr 2 Hr Repair Lead Time= 155days Value Added Time=84.5 hrs

Current-state Value Stream Lean - VSM

Future-state Value Stream Lean - VSM

Lean Six Sigma?

( EHS ) H 16 4 7 1 8 3 12 M 9 13 6 17 14 10 L 11 5 LL Ref: Michael George: Lean Six Sigma L 15 M H 2 HH (Capex & )

TOC? ASQ SSBOK TOC? Theory of Constraints

(Chain)

(Process) (System) - -, - Goal (Interact) Interact)?

TOC Tool

TOC 5 step 5 Identify (, Drum) Decide (, Buffer) Subordinate (, Rope) Elevate ( ) Repeat & Control

The Goal

TOC - DBR? RM Rope Buffer Drum A B C D E 11 Parts per Day 9 Parts per Day 5 Parts per Day 8 Parts per Day 15 Parts per Day

TOC - TP? What To Change? How To Cause The Change? What to Change To?

TOC - TP?

Evaporating Cloud (EC) TOC - TP?

TOC - TP? : 15. ( 2 ) A Be Happy B Get adequate Sleep C Do what I Enjoy D Go to bed by 11:00 (on school nights) D Don t go to bed by 11:00

TOC - TP?? A-B A-B B-D 7 B-D 7. A-C. A-C. C-D. C-D 11:00. The weakest assumption seems to be here Injection: Manage time better

TOC - TP? ) ( ERP.

TOC - TP?? ( ) CRT, FRT, TT, PT / TRIZ

TOC - CCPM? 6. PROJECT TIME MANAGEMENT 6.4 SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT 6.4.2 Tools and Techniques for Schedule Development 6.4.2.1 Resource leveling heuristics Line 19: Critical chain is a technique that modifies the project schedule to account for limited resources. * PMBOK: Project Management Body of Knowledge by PMI (PMI: Project Management Institute, USA)

TOC - CCPM? Project Management *Critical chain impacts shaded blocks. 1 Integration 2 Scope 3 Time 4 Cost 5 Quality 6 Human Resources 7 Communications 8 Risk 9 Procurement Communications Management:

: TOC CCPM? WBS " " OBS " " WBS O B S MATRIX " " ( ) Bar chart Display of Network Data CPM (Activities)

PMBOK vs. Six Sigma Tool TOC CCPM?

PMBOK vs. Six Sigma Tool TOC CCPM?

TOC - CCPM? (Safety) Student Syndrome. Parkinson s Law? Bad Multitasking Fire-fighting

Student Syndrome. TOC - CCPM?

TOC - CCPM?

TOC - CCPM? Multi Multi-Tasking? Multi-tasking tasking Task A Task B Task C 3 days 3 days 3 days Should happen: Task A Task B Task C 3 days 3 days 3 days Could happen: A B C A B C 6 days Does happen: A B C A B C 7 days

TOC - CCPM? How long will it take? Task A : 5 Task B : 5 Task A 5 Days Task C : 5 Task B 5 Days Task D 10 Days Task D : 10 How long is the project? Task C 5 Days

Delays are passed on and Gains are NOT TOC - CCPM? Task A 3? Task A 5 3 Days X Task C 8? Task A, B, C 2? Task B 5 Days Task D 10 Days Task C Task D 3? 5 X8 Days Protecting Individual Tasks Provides Little Protection!

Project Common Cause & Special Cause TOC - CCPM? - Common Cause? - Special Cause?

TOC - CCPM? Common Cause Variation 50% 90% t Probability Time

CCPM

CCPM User Report

TOC - TA? Throughput Account (TA) T I OE (NP) = T - OE (ROI) = / = / * /

TOC TOC - TA? (T) (I) (OE) (Throughtput): T = ( ) - ( + ) (Inventory) :, (,, ) (Operating Expense): = +

TA Question: / Speed?

TRIZ TRIZ?

TRIZ TRIZ

LEAN/TOC Six Sigma Convergence High Level LEAN / TOC Define Measure Analyze Improve Control Low Level LEAN / TOC : - Value based Project - - Speed

LEAN/TOC Six Sigma Lean and Six Sigma Convergence # of Parts (Steps) OVERALL YIELD % Distribution Shifted ± 1.5σ Avg ± 3σ Yield ± 4σ at each ± 5σ Step ± 6σ 1 93.3% 99.4% 99.9% 99.99% 7 61.6 95.7 99.8 99.99 10 50.18 94.0 99.8 99.99 20 25.1 88.3 99.5 99.99 80.4 60.8 98.2 99.97 100.1 53.6 97.7 99.96 200 --- 28.8 95.5 99.93 500 --- 4.4 89.0 99.83 1000 ---.2 79.2 99.66 3000 --- --- 50.2 98.98 17000 --- --- 1.9 94.38 Lean Six Sigma

LEAN/TOC Six Sigma Convergence

LEAN/TOC Six Sigma Convergence Integration : ASQ Six Sigma BB Body of Knowledge GE Capital DFSS : PM + Design & Engineering Technique + Six Sigma Lean Six Sigma by George Group: PM, Lean+TOC CMMI & Six Sigma : GM, Ford, Raytheon, Honeywell, AveryDennison

LEAN/TOC Six Sigma 1. Identify the Constraint 2. Exploit the Constraint Convergence 3. Subordinate everything to the Constraint 4. Elevate the Constraint 5. Repeat for the new Constraint

LEAN/TOC Six Sigma Process Improvements Roadmap: CMMI & 6 Sigma Measure Improvements and Rebaseline (CMMI 5) Convergence Deploy Improvements (CMMI 5) 6 Sigma Sigma Pilot Improvements (CMMI 5) Select And Prioritize Improvements (CMMI 5) Causal Analysis and Resolution (CMMI 5) Establish Process Capability Baseline (CMM 4) Set Objective Performance and Quality Goals (CMM 4)

CASE STUDY Lean/TOC Six Sigma Convergence

A Case Lean/TOC Six Sigma.,. 200 TOC/Lean,. - 17% 25% - 23% - 47% - 80% - 50% 90% - 50% 300%

A Case : - TOC,, Lean(TPS) - - / - -?

A Case 5S (Lean): - - - ( ) - Spare part Lean Thinking (Six Sigma) (TOC/Lean) / (TOC/Lean)

Case Study : Non-manufacturing Processes Bank of America: ROI in a Sales & Marketing Environment focusing on revenue enhancement rather than expense savings and having a systematic means of capturing financial impact HSBC: Improve trading capability in retail brokerage, successful merging of three brokerage trading platforms which enabled them to reduce their costs per transactions DOE for Non-Manufacturing Processes: - Improve response rate on a direct-mail post card - Attract people to their new Internet Site - RS design with three factors(commercial length, repetition, etc.) - Two level factorial design a better telephone bill with color, font, etc. - Reduce the receivables from 200 to only 44 days, studying 4 factor Ad Billing - Factors in Pilot Training and Transfer - DOE in Marketing, 7 factors with ad medium, packaging design, size of candy bar, etc. - DOE to reduce service order processing time and response time to customers

Hidden Methodology for CI & Value Creating Organization Strategy Goal Breakthrough Management Tools Organization Asset Standard Process Common Process Asset

Organizational Excellence Back to the Basic GOOD LEADERSHIP GOOD STRATEGY GOOD PROCESSES supported by good People, Resources and Partners GOOD RESULTS

Organizational Excellence Back to the Basic A customer-driven strategy A people-orientated strategy About leadership and management involvement A result-orientated strategy