에너지경제연구 제12권 제2호

Similar documents
부문별 에너지원 수요의 변동특성 및 공통변동에 미치는 거시적 요인들의 영향력 분석

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 1~29 정책 용도별특성을고려한도시가스수요함수의 추정 :, ARDL,,, C4, Q4-1 -

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 학술 전력시장가격에대한역사적요인분해 * 35

에너지경제연구 제12권 제2호

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 89~114 정책 일본의 CO 2 배출, 원자력에너지, 신재생에너지관계분석 *

공휴일 전력 수요에 관한 산업별 분석

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 1, March 2018 : pp. 37~65 가정부문전기수요의결정요인분석 : 동태적패널 FD GMM 기법을중심으로 37

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 95~118 학술 탄소은행제의가정용전력수요절감효과 분석 1) 2) 3) * ** *** 95

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 1~26 실물옵션을이용한해상풍력실증단지 사업의경제성평가 1

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 1~18 가격비대칭성검정모형민감도분석 1

2

164


에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 14, Number 2, September 2015 : pp. 99~126 산유국의재생에너지정책결정요인분석 1) 99

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 1, March 2018 : pp. 67~94 기온효과를반영한 한국의환경쿠즈네츠가설검정 ** *** :,,,, *. ** ( ), ***

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 57~83 발전용유연탄가격과여타상품가격의 동조화현상에대한실증분석 57

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

에너지경제연구 제12권 제2호

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 85~114 산업별에너지원간대체관계추정을통한탄소세의 CO 2 감축효과분석 * 85

KDI정책포럼제221호 ( ) ( ) 내용문의 : 이재준 ( ) 구독문의 : 발간자료담당자 ( ) 본정책포럼의내용은 KDI 홈페이지를 통해서도보실수있습니다. 우리나라경

<C3D6C1BE2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D32C8A3292E687770>

<C7A5C1F620BEE7BDC4>

에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부

IDP www idp or kr IDP 정책연구 한국경제의구조적문제와개혁방향 민주정책연구원 The Institute for Democracy and Policies

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

歯표지_최종H_.PDF

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 19~41 석유제품브랜드의자산가치측정 : 휘발유를 중심으로 19

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

에너지경제연구 제14권 제1호

동아시아국가들의실질환율, 순수출및 경제성장간의상호관계비교연구 : 시계열및패널자료인과관계분석

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 18, Number 1, March 2019 : pp 에너지전환정책및고령화가국민경제에미치는영향 : 확률적중첩세대일반균형모형 (Stochastic Overlapping Genera

조재욱D)-63-88


06_À̼º»ó_0929

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 147~181 정책 국내도시가구전력소비효율의결정요인분석

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

192

에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

조사연구 권 호 연구논문 한국노동패널조사자료의분석을위한패널가중치산출및사용방안사례연구 A Case Study on Construction and Use of Longitudinal Weights for Korea Labor Income Panel Survey 2)3) a

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

±×¸°¸®Æ÷Æ® ³»Áö5Â÷

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 12, Number 1, March 2013 : pp. 125~158 알뜰주유소전환으로인한자영주유소의 휘발유가격인하효과분석 125

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

untitled

<3133B1C732C8A328BCF6C1A4292E687770>

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

09김정식.PDF


hwp

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

<C7D1B1B9B0E6C1A6BFACB1B8C7D0C8B828C0CCC1BEBFF85FC0CCBBF3B5B75FBDC5B1E2B9E9292E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

13.11 ①초점

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

노동경제논집 38권 4호 (전체).hwp


#Ȳ¿ë¼®

......(N)

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

대구전시컨벤션센터 전시행사의 지역경제 파급효과 분석

국제무역론-02장

歯4차학술대회원고(황수경이상호).PDF

11¹Ú´ö±Ô

ISSUE

주요국 에너지 Profile 분석_아랍에미리트

歯목차.PDF


학습영역의 Taxonomy에 기초한 CD-ROM Title의 효과분석

20, 41..,..,.,.,....,.,, (relevant).,.,..??.,

, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***

<C7D1B1B9B1A4B0EDC8ABBAB8C7D0BAB85F31302D31C8A35F32C2F75F E687770>

14.531~539(08-037).fm

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

¹ýÁ¶ 12¿ù ¼öÁ¤.PDF

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

10¿ÀÁ¤ÁØ

<BCF6BDC D31385FB0EDBCD3B5B5B7CEC8DEB0D4C5B8BFEEB5B5C0D4B1B8BBF3BFACB1B85FB1C7BFB5C0CE2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

이용석 박환용 - 베이비부머의 특성에 따른 주택유형 선택 변화 연구.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

지능정보연구제 16 권제 1 호 2010 년 3 월 (pp.71~92),.,.,., Support Vector Machines,,., KOSPI200.,. * 지능정보연구제 16 권제 1 호 2010 년 3 월

02이용배(239~253)ok

공연영상

KEEI ISSUE PAPER(Vol.1, No.6)

untitled

¨ë Áö¸®ÇÐȸÁö-¼Û°æ¾ðOK

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

1-2-2하태수.hwp

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

pdf 16..

04 형사판례연구 hwp

Transcription:

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 12, Number 2, September 2013 : pp. 59~83 부문별에너지소비와경제성장의 인과관계분석 59

60

61

< 표 1> 주요경제및에너지지표변화, 1990 년 2011 년 ~ [ 그림 1] 우리나라의경제및에너지관련주요지표변화, 1990 년 ~2011 년 62

63

64

65

66

67

68

2) 여기서소표본이라함은약 25 35 개의표본을지칭한다. 69

< 표 2> 단위근검정결과 70

71

< 표 3> 산업부문의 Johansen 검정의공적분검정결과 < 표 4> 수송부문의 Johansen 검정의공적분검정결과 72

< 표 5> 가정 상업부문의 Johansen 검정의공적분검정결과 73

< 표 6> Granger 인과관계검정결과 74

< 표 7> 산업부문오차수정모형추정결과 75

< 표 8> 가정 상업부문오차수정모형추정결과 76

77

접수일 (2013 년 6 월 12 일 ), 게재확정일 (2013 년 8 월 12 일 ) 78

. 1998. :. 1.. 2003.. 12 2.. 2011... 2001. : CO 2. 49 1. Abosedra, S. and H. Baghestani. 1991. New evidence on the causal relationship between United States energy consumption and gross national product. Journal of Energy and Development, Vol.14, pp.285~292 Akarca, A. T. and T. V. Long. 1980. On the relationship between energy and GNP: a re-examination. Journal of Energy and Development, Vol.5, pp.326~331 Apergis, N., Payne, J.E. 2009. Energy consumption and economic growth in Central America: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Economics 31, 211 216. Chen, S.-T., Kuo, H.-I., Chen, C.-C. 2007. The relationship between GDP and electricity consumption in 10 Asian Countries. Energy Policy 35, 2611 2621. Cheng, B.S. 1997. Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in brazil, Mexico, and Venezula: A Time Series Analysis. Applied Economics, Letters Vol.4, Engle, R. F. and C.W.J. Granger. 1987. Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55, 251-276. Glasure, Y. U. 2002. Energy and National Income in Korea: Further Evidence on the Role of Omitted Variable. Energy Economics, 24, 355-365. 79

Granger, C. W. J. 1969. Investigating Causal Relation By Econometric and Cross-Sectional Method. Econometrica, 37, 424-438. Gonzalo, J. 1994. Comparison of Five Alternative Methods of Estimating Long-Run Equilibrium, Relationships. Journal of Economics, Vol.60, No. 12, pp.203~233. Ho, C-Y., Siu, K.W. 2007. A dynamic equilibrium of electricity consumption and GDP in Hong Kong: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 35. 4), 2507 2513. Hwang, D.B.K and B. Gum. 1991. The causal relationship between energy and GNP: the case of Taiwan. Journal of Energy and Development, Vol.16, pp.219~226 Johansen, S. and K. Juselius. 1990. Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Application to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210. Jumbe, C.B.L. 2004. Cointegration and causality between electricity consumption and GDP: empirical evidence from Malawi. Energy Economics 26, 61 68. Karanfil, F. 2008. Energy consumption and economic growth revisited: does the size of unrecorded economy matter?. Energy Policy 36 (8), 3029 3035. Kraft, J. and Kraft A. 1978. On the Relationship Between Energy and GNP. Journal of Energy and Development, 3, 401-403. Lee, C. C. 2005. Energy Consumption and GDP in Developing Countries: A Co-integrated Panel Analysis. Energy Economics, 27, 415-427. Lee, C. C. and C. P. Chang. 2007. Energy Consumption and GDP Revisited: A Panel Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries. Energy Economics, 29, 1206-1223. Maddala, G.S. 1992. Introduction to Econometrics, Macmillan. Masih, A.M.M. and R. Masih. 1996. Energy Consumption, Real Income and Temporal Causality: Results from a Multi-Country Study Based on Cointegration and Error-Correction Modelling Techniques. Energy Economics, 18, 165-183. Mozumder, P. and Marathe, A. 2007. Causality Relationship Between Electricity Consumption and GDP in Bangladesh. Energy Policy, 35, 395-402. 80

Oh, W. K. and Kihoon Lee. 2004a. Causal Relationship Between Energy Consumption and GDP Revisited: the Case of Korea 1970-1999. Energy Economics, 26, 51-59.. 2004b. Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Korea: Testing the Causality Relation. Journal of Policy Modelling, 26, 973-981. Perman. P. 1991. Cointegratuib: An Introduction to the Literature. Journal of Economic Studies, Vol.18, No 3, pp.3~20. Shiu, A., Lam, P. 2004. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Policy 32, 47 54. 4 Sims, C. A. 1972. Money, Income and Causality. American Economic Review, September, 540-552. Soytas, U. and Sari, R. 2003. Energy Consumption and GDP: Causality Relationship in G7 Countries and Emerging Markets. Energy Economics, 25, 33-37. Squalli, J. 2007. Electricity consumption and economic growth: bounds and causality analyses for OPEC members. Energy Economics 29, 1192 1205. Stern, D. I. 1993. Energy and Growth in the U.S.: A Multivariate Approach. Energy Economics, 15, 136-150. Stewart, Kenneth G. 2005. Introduction to Econometrics, Thomson, 2005. Toda, H. Y. and Phillips, P. C. 1993. Vector Autoregressions and Causality. Econometrica, 61, 1367-1393. Yoo, S. 2005. Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Korea. Energy Policy 33, 1627 1632. Yu, E. S. H. and J. Y. Choi. 1985. The Causal Relationship Between Energy and GNP: An International Comparison. Journal of Energy and Development, 10, 249-272. Yu, E. S. H. and B. K. Hwang. 1984. The Relationship Between Energy and GNP: Further Results. Energy Economics, 6(3), 186-190. Yu, E. S. H. and J. C. Jin. 1992. Co-integration Tests of Energy Consumption, Income and Employment. Resource and Energy, 14(3), 259-266. 81

Zachariadis, Theodoros. 2007. Exploring the Relationship Between Energy Use and Economic Growth with Bivariate Models: New Evidence from G-7 Countries. Energy Economics, 29, 1233-1253. Zhang, Xing-Ping, Cheng, Xiao-Mei. 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics 68 (10), 2706 2712. 82

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between sectoral energy consumption and economic growth for Korea from 1991 to 2011 employing the vector error-correction model estimation. With respect to the direction of causality, industrial sector is uni-directional running from energy consumption to economic growth in long term as well as short term. Transport sector, on the other hand, real GDP growth leads to energy use only in short term. Lastly, there is bidirectional causality between energy consumption and real GDP in residential and commercial sector. These findings have important policy implications, since the adoption of suitable structural policies can induce energy conservation. Key Words : Sectoral energy consumption, Economic growth, Granger causality, Vector error correction model JEL Codes : C22, L94, Q43, Q48 83