2003 12
LG
< > 2002 534%,, OECD 596%, 566%OECD (GDI; Gender-related Development Index) 14629, (GEM; Gender Employ-ment Measure) 66 61 (, ),, (, ),, 1999 4 531% 350% 461% 269% (M), 10 6 10% 10300
300 53%p 100 10% 276%100 231% " ",
< > < > 1 8 14 22 25
< > < I-1> (2002)1 < I-2>, 20002 < I-3>, 20002 < I-4> (2000)3 < I-5> (GDI) 4 < I-6> (GEM) 4 < I-7> 5 < I-8> 7 < II-1>, (1999)9 < II-2>, (1998)10 < II-3> (1998)10 < II-4> 11 < II-5> 12 < III-1> GDP 14 < III-2> 15 < III-3> 16 < III-4> (TFR) 16 < III-5> (2001~2010)17 < III-6> (1999~2010)17 < III-7> 100 (1996~2000)20 < III-8> 21 < IV-1> IBM 22 < IV-2> Deloitte-Touche 23 < IV-3> 27 <II-1> 9
I 1, OECD, 2002 534%,, OECD 596% 1970 < I-1> *(2002) ( : %) 719 701 693 597 534 410 OECD 596 : * 15 ~ 64 (%) : OECD, Education at a Glance(2003), 25 64 (Tertiary education) 2000 365%OECD 481% 1
OECD < I-2>, 2000* ( : %) 503 496 456 342 365 OECD 481 : * 1999 : OECD, Education at a Glance(2002) < I-3>, 2000* ( : %) 402 475 309 OECD 531 446 156 55~64 35~54 25~34 ( ) : OECD, Education at a Glance(2002) 2001 566%OECD 714%, 689%, 668%, 2
349% OECD 112% 3 < I-4> *(2000) ( : %p) OECD 45 43 116 92 80 112 349 335 : * 25 ~ 54 ; = - : OECD, Education at a Glance(2002),, 20% 2 (GDI; Gender- 3
related Development Index) 14629, (GEM; Gender Employment Measure)6661, (, ),, (, ) < I-5> (GDI) Rank 1 3 4 10 11 12 14 16 23 24 29 49 54 60 64 77 1 08 06 04 : GDI(Gender-related Development Index),, : Human Development Report 2002, UNDP 1 08 06 < I-6> (GEM) Rank 1 3 7 8 10 11 13 16 23 31 32 38 43 50 61 66 66 04 02 0 : GEM(Gender Employment Measure),, : Human Development Report 2002, UNDP 4
3, 1960 1970 1980, 1990 2000 < I-7> 1960~1970 1980 1990 Cost Case Convenience Case Token Case Business Case 1~2, : Token( ) Case :,, 2002 5
4 20, / (work/family balance) EU - 1964/ - 1970/ - 1963/ - 1986/ / - : 20 Initiative - : 80 - : 50 - : 50 - : 90 - : 10-1987/ - - / - (12-18 ), + 11 -, - 1-3 (13) - - - / /, -, -, / / - -, - - -,,,,,,, ( ) 5 (wwwrecruitcokr) 127% (402%), (395%), (324%), (244%) (54%), (57%),, 6
(36%) < I-8> ( : %) 324 395 402 244 121 128 127 36 54 57 IT : 300 60 : wwwrecruitcokr < > A ( : %) 995 994 971 886 666 855 773 05 06 29 114 334 145 227 / : A 7
,, 25~35,,,,,,, Minority 1, 1 1999 4 531% 350% 8
461% 269% < II-1> ( :%) 687 463 730 191 547 561 700 : 4 :, (2003) < II-1>, (100%=134,695) 28 37 53 90 260 531 136 (100%=123,431) 52 82 269 245 216 : 4 :, (2003) 2 2, 24~35 9
M (M) (%) 120 < II-2>, (2001) 90 60 30 0 15~19 20~24 25~29 30~34 35~39 40~44 45~49 50~54 55~59 60~64 : ILO, Yearbook of Labour Statistics(2002) < II-3> (2001) (%) 120 90 60 30 0 15~19 20~24 25~29 30~34 35~39 40~44 45~49 50~54 55~59 60~64 : ILO, Yearbook of Labour Statistics(2002) 10 6 10% 10
< II-4> ( : %) ( 276) ( 164) ( 241) ( 154) 25~34 197 348 25~34 179 291 35~44 162 310 35~44 142 267 45~54 139 166 45~54 164 149 : 25~54 : 3, 11
< II-5> ; : ILO, Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling(2001); 383% 120 44 385 269 236 232 237 383 22 72 :, 2000, 12
13,,
1 21 (pool),, GDP (GDI) 1 < III-1> GDP 08 06 04 02 0-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 GDP(logged) : GDI(Gender-related Development Index) : UNDP, Human Development Report, 2002 14
< III-2> - Affirmative Action,,,,, - - ( 6 ), - - - - 2007 2 15
(%) 80 < III-3> (%) 12 60 () 09 40 06 20 0 () 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 03 00 : (0~14 ) (65 ), =(65 ) / (0~14 )100 : 1 1970453 2002117 1970 2002 (30 )336, (08), (07), (08) () 400 300 < III-4> (TFR) 453 347 283 200 100 167 159 165 147 130 117 000 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 : (Total Fertility Rate, TFR) : 16
, 10300 300 53%p < III-5> (2001~2010) 100%=5,820 100%=2,898 48 139 208 ( :, %) & 220 454 / & 50 290 100%=2,922 285 70 236 :,,, Bloomberg,, < III-6> (1999~2010*) ( : %) 744 13%pt 757 474 53%pt 527 1999 2010(E) 1999 2010(E) : * 15 ; 1 1999 2010 61%, 2010 5% :,,, Bloomberg,, 17
3,,, (War for talent) (Congressional Commission on Advancing Women), 4, 18
19, Catalyst, 85% 5
21 6 P&G 7~8 14 < III-7> 100 *(1996~2000) (%, ) 100 10% 276 100 10% 207 100 231 : * : Catalyst, Fortune, 20
100 10% 276%100 231% "" 100,000 < III-8> ( ) 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2001 : 2001 : US Census Bureau 21
1 IBM IBM 1994, IBM 32% 20%, IBM (TF) ' ' 96 99 175%, 235% < IV-1> IBM - IBM1930 - (Gerstner) IBM IBM - IBM80 ~ 90 - IBM, - 2-22
2 Deloitte-Touche, (Women s Initiative) 9397 2002 460 < IV-2> Deloitte-Touche - (Deloitte) - 5-92 - (Women s Initiative) : - - ( - T/F team, ) 10 5% 14% 25% 18% 10 9397 2002 460-100 30 5 3 23
, MSD - (230) (114) - 2000680 1 1,230 HSBC - 470 286(61%) - 40%,, &, 24
- - - -, 1, 25
,, 2 - Top Management - - IT,,, R&D, Staff - (,,, ) -, Mento,, - - Gap 26
, < IV-3> ( ) ( ) ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :, 2002 27
28 3,, 25-34
29,