Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The objectives of this study are analyzing research trends of the last 20 years and finding futuristic issues of Journal of Educational Information and Media Study. In order to achieve the objectives, we analyzed 545 articles from the Journals which published a total 21 books and 4 volumes in 2015. A total of three researchers selected five major core keywords while reading all of the summaries of the papers. After all, it was possible to select a total 1,141 keywords. The most frequently appeared keywords are e-learning, web-based learning, learning achievement, interaction, satisfaction, distance education. By the criteria of government, the most frequently appearing keywords are as follows: 1) Kim Dae-Jung: web-based learning, educational broadcasting and learning achievement 2) Rho Moo-Hyun: e-learning, web-based learning and learning achievement, 3) Lee Myung-Bak: e-learning, Satisfaction and learning achievement, 4) Park Geun-Hye: learning achievement, e-learning and cooperative learning. These results show some meaningful outcomes. First, the frequency of web-based learning has declined accordingly: 1st-2nd-5th-62nd. Second, the following keywords frequence have also significantly declined - distance education, cyber class and literacy. Third, the frequency of keywords such as cooperative learning, flow, cognitive load, smart education and SNS has increased. These outcomes clearly show a changing tend and terms used in education. Lastly, while using network-text analysis, it was possible to present the median and relationship amongst the keywords of each government. Key words : subject analysis, network text analysis, governmental analysis, research subject change trends, frequency analysis * 2015. ** :, (E-mail : 001@alcob.org)
. (research on the research) (trend analysis),., (,,,,, 2015; Heeks & Balur, 2007; Hsieh & Shannon, 2005).,, (2014).,,,,,, (, 2015)..,,,., 1996 2015 20 20,,.,, (2014),. 20,, 3 (Core Keyword). (Keyword),. 3 5, (Cross Check).,.,.
, (,,,,, 2013).,, (2015),, HRD (,,, 2014;, 2000; Randolph, 2008).. (1998~2002), (2003~2007), (2008~2012), (2013~), 3.., 20?, 20?. 2015 20. 5 10. (2006). 10 200,,,., (92%). (ATI) 34%,.,,,,.,,.
,,, (2014) 2 10(20042013) (,,,,, ) (,, /,,,,, ). 58.8%, (ISD,, /, ) / 74%, (, CAI, /, WBI/, /) WBI/ 56%. 59.5%, / 72.3%. WBI/ 73.3%. (26.6%), (25.3%), /(13.6%), (39.1%), (18.8%), (11.8%).. (2014) () 2006 2012 278( 105, 173),,, 4. 2.0 2008,,.,,,,.,,,, (2005) 1995~2004,, Educational Technology Research and Development, Educational Technology (WBI),., (2015). (1996~2000), ICT (2001~2005), (2006~2010), (2011~2015),,,. 20
.,,,,, (2014),,. (), (semantic network matrix) (, 2015;,, 2012). (keyword),,.. (: ), (, ),. (triangulation) (Core Keyword). (Brewer & Hunter, 2006). (Cross Check).. 1996 1 2015 21 4 20. (RISS),,, 2015 545. < 1>.
() () (%) () 1996 1 8 14(1) 5 16 3.0 1(2) 8 14(2) 12 1997 3 8 8 1.5 2008 14(3) 10 1998 4(1) 9 9 1.7 14(4) 7 5(1) 8 1999 22 4.2 15(1) 9 5(2) 14 15(2) 7 2009 6(1) 8 2000 17 3.2 15(3) 5 6(2) 9 15(4) 14 7(1) 8 16(1) 6 7(2) 7 16(2) 7 2001 26 4.9 2010 7(3) 5 16(3) 6 7(4) 6 16(4) 7 8(1) 6 17(1) 6 () (%) 34 6.4 35 6.6 26 4.9 2002 2003 8(2) 7 17(2) 5 32 6.0 2011 8(3) 10 17(3) 9 8(4) 9 17(4) 6 9(1) 7 18(1) 5 9(2) 4 18(2) 4 28 5.3 2012 9(3) 7 18(3) 7 9(4) 10 18(4) 4 26 4.9 20 3.8 10(1) 5 19(1) 6 2004 10(2) 9 19(2) 6 32 6.0 2013 10(3) 8 19(3) 11 35 6.6 2005 10(4) 10 19(4) 12 11(1) 7 20(1) 6 11(2) 11 20(2) 7 33 6.2 2014 11(3) 6 20(3) 5 11(4) 9 20(4) 10 12(1) 8 21(1) 7 28 5.3 2006 12(2) 13 21(2) 7 48 9.1 2015 12(3) 14 21(3) 7 30 5.7 12(4) 13 21(4) 9 13(1) 13 2007 13(2) 11 13(3) 9 13(4) 7 40 7.6 545 100.0
20 (Core Keyword), (Network Text Analysis: NTA).,, (Popping, 2000). (2015).., 545 MS-Excel 2010,,,,,.., 3 5. 1), 2), 3) 2 3. (: e-, e, e-learning ), (:, ).,., 2,725(545*5) KrKwic. KrKwic krtitle.exe,, Leydesdorff(2004).,, 20., 5 (co-occurrence). words.txt, text.txt 5 1 1). coocc.dbf., coocc.dbf Excel NetMiner 1) krtitle.exe text.txt 1 1.
., 2) (Centrality Degree),. Kamada & Kawai...20 20(19962015) 545 5 1,141.,,,,,,,,, 50 30 ~ 50 20 ~ 30 15 ~ 20 10 ~ 15 5 ~ 10,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ICT,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, e-, LMS,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,, SNS,,,,,,,,,,,,, CAT,,,,,,,, SPRT,,,, EBS,,,,,,,,,,,, ICT,, 2), (, 2012, p.257).
,,,. 5 < 2>, 10 [ 1].. 1998~2002 ( : 331), 2003~2007 ( : 494), 2008~2012 ( : 361), 2013~2015 ( : 317). [ 2], 154.
(1998~2002),,,,,,,. 3 [ 3]. (2003~2007),,,,,,,,., (436), (14 1). 4 [ 4]. (2008~2012).,,,,,. 1~5. (313), (510),,,. 4 [ 5]. (2013~2015) 3.,, SNS,,,,,
.,. (132), (131), (71), (61), SNS (07), (05). 2011., 2,. 3 [ 6].
.,. < 3>.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, SNS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, SNS,,,, 20. < 4>. < 4>,,,,,,,,, SNS,,.,,,,
1 2 5 62 2 130 X X 3 3 3 1 3 13 61 30 5 13 17 62 6 5 4 3 6 31 29 62 6 62 X X 12 1 1 2 41 4 2 14 X 6 8 30 84 7 12 30 X 8 29 X 12 9 12 62 X 40 5 62 X 25 7 9 25 13 17 3 SNS X X X 3 X 40 28 6 X 130 29 6 X X X 6. < 5>. < 6>, [ 7].,,.
3 2 4 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 20 2 14 0.4 9 0.8 9 0.6 8 0.7 7 0.5 7 0.4 7 0.8 5 0.4 5 0.5 5 0.5,., +, +.
< 7>. < 8>, [ 8]. 1 2 8 3 12 3 2 3 3 1 4 1 2 1 7 2 4 7 2 2 1 1 8 1 7 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 12 1 1 1 1 2 7 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 36 3.7 28 1.6 20 1.9 18 2.2 15 1.5 13 1.8 12 1.1 11 0.9 10 1 9 0.5 9 0.8
,,,,., +, +, +, +. < 9>. < 10>, [ 9]. 3 3 4 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 2 5 3 1 2 3 3 3 2 1 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 27 2 19 1.9 16 1.7 15 1.8 13 1.1 13 1.5 10 1.4 9 0.8 9 0.9 9 0.7 8 0.6
,,,,., +, +. < 11>. < 12>, [ 10]. SNS 2 4 1 1 2 2 1 4 2 SNS 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 12 0.9 11 0.6 7 0.7 SNS 7 0.6 7 0.4 5 0.7 5 0.7 5 0.3 4 0.6 4 0.4
3,,., 2.,.,,. V. 1996 1 2015 21 4 20 545 (Core Keyword),,..,, 20,,,,,,,,,,,, 20. (2006),, 10., (1998~2002),,,,, (2003~2007),,,,.,. TV. (TV, ). (2008~2012),,,,, (2013~ ),, SNS,,.,,,, SNS,.
,,,,,,,, SNS,,. (, 2011), SNS,.,,,.., (2013 ~) SNS,,, ( ) (, 2011). 2009, 2010 3),.., 20 20 12,,,,, 6,,,,,.,.,.,,.,.,,,,.. 3) 2010~2012 Riss 48, 8.
..,..,, (Risk Society).
,, (2014). : 1982~2012. (1), 63-92. (Translated in English) Kwak, S. G., Park, H. O., & Kim, H. J. (2014). The Research Trends in The Publications on University-based Lifelong Education - Based on theses and dissertations published in Korea from 1982 to 2012. Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(1), 63-92. (2011). :. (Translated in English) Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). The implementation plan of smart education strategy. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology,,,, (2015). :. (1), 291-315. (Translated in English) Kim, Y. H., Jeong, J. H., Kang, D. B., Park, K. M., & Kim, S. M. (2015). Trend Analysis of Research Topics in Journal of Lifelong Learning Society: Using Network Text Analysis. Journal fo Lifelong Learning Society, 11(1), 291-315., Loet Leydesdorff (2004). KrKwic. (5), 1377-1388. (Translated in English) Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1388.,,,, (2013). :. (2), 45-71. (Translated in English) Bae, S. H., Jang, H. Y., Oh, S. H., Jang, C. S., & Lee, T. H. (2013). Vocational Education Research in Korea: A Trend Analysis of the Journal of Vocational Education Research. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 32(2), 45-71., (2015).. (2), 341-363. (Translated in English) Song, H. D., & Kim, K. S. (2015). Analyses on Research Trends in the Field of Educational Technology According to the ICT Policy Changes. Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 341-363., (2014). :. (1), 117-136. (Translated in English) Wang, Y., & Lee, Y. J. (2014). An Analysis of Research Trends on Educational Media in School Education in Korea and China: Review of the Journal of Educational Information
and Media and Electrifying Education Research Journal. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(1), 117-136.,,,, (2005).. (4), 229-254. (Translated in English) Lee, S. S., Kang, J. C., Lee, I. J., Hwang, J. Y., & Lee Y. N. (2005). An analysis of trends in WBI researches published in the major Korean and American journals of educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(4), 229-254. (2012). :. (Translated in English) Lee, S. S. (2012). Network Analysis Methods. Seoul: Nonhyung.,, (2014). 10:. (2), 137-159. (Translated in English) Lim, H. J., Yoo, Y. S., & Chung, J. S. (2014). The Comparison Analysis of Domestic Research Trends of Educational Technology in Last Decade. Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(2), 137-159., (2012).. (2), 53-66. (Translated in English) Jang, J. W., & Choi, K. H. (2012). Statics Act Content Analysis using Semantic Network Analysis. Journal of The Korean Official Statistics, 17(2), 53-66. (2000).. (4), 167-194. (Translated in English) Jin, W. K. (2000). The Interdisciplinarity of Educational Technology and It's Developmental Direction. Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 3-25. (2006).. (2), 189-212. (Translated in English) Heo, H. O. (2006). The trends and future directions in educational information and media research. Journal of Educational Information and Media, 12(2), 189-212. Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265. Hsieh, H. F., Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis. London: Sage. Randolph, J. J. (2008). Multidisciplinary methods in educational technology and development. Finland: HAMK University of Applied Science. : 2015.02.15 / : 2015.02.23 / : 2015.03.21
: 20,,, 20,. 21 4 545., 3 5(Core Keyword). 1,141., 20,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,. 1-2 -5-62,,,,,,,, SNS...