PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

Similar documents
F1-1(수정).ppt

2



<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

BSC Discussion 1

02_연구보고서_보행자 안전확보를 위한 기술개발 기획연구( )최종.hwp

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

15_3oracle

歯1.PDF

1.장인석-ITIL 소개.ppt

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

untitled

<30362E20C6EDC1FD2DB0EDBFB5B4EBB4D420BCF6C1A42E687770>

歯 PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

레이아웃 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

슬라이드 1

untitled


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

강의지침서 작성 양식

<C1B6BBE7BFACB1B D303428B1E8BEF0BEC B8F1C2F7292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

untitled



<28BCF6BDC D B0E6B1E2B5B520C1F6BFAABAB020BFA9BCBAC0CFC0DAB8AE20C1A4C3A520C3DFC1F8C0FCB7AB5FC3D6C1BE E E687770>

0511버스교통(표1_4)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

인권1~2부73p

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc


ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식3)

Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) and Special Access Program Facility (SAPF) Criteria

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

2013<C724><B9AC><ACBD><C601><C2E4><CC9C><C0AC><B840><C9D1>(<C6F9><C6A9>).pdf

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

untitled

ZNMMZTUCJDUV.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

13 Who am I? R&D, Product Development Manager / Smart Worker Visualization SW SW KAIST Software Engineering Computer Engineering 3

03.Agile.key

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

SchoolNet튜토리얼.PDF

학교폭력표지

Microsoft Word - 1-차우창.doc

06_ÀÌÀçÈÆ¿Ü0926

서론 34 2

SW¹é¼Ł-³¯°³Æ÷ÇÔÇ¥Áö2013

,.,,. (Vocational Ethics) (, 1999), Brown(2012). (, 2004).,,,,, ,400 (,,, 2011;, 2006)., (, 2006; Brown, 2012). (harm) (, 2006). NCDA(National

훈련교재 목록-내지-0520.indd

<31B1E8C0B1C8F128C6ED2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

08최봉석ㆍ구지선.hwp

64회 SHRM-수정3

Æ÷Àå½Ã¼³94š

11이정민

<BAA3C6AEB3B2C1F6BFF8BBE7BEF72DB1E8B3ADBFB52DC1FD2E687770>

2011´ëÇпø2µµ 24p_0628

<C1DF3320BCF6BEF7B0E8C8B9BCAD2E687770>


저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

ISO17025.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

해사안전소식_2015_겨울.indd

¼±ÅÃÀû º¹¸®ÈÄ»ýÁ¦µµ.hwp

¹ýÁ¶ 12¿ù ¼öÁ¤.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

UPMLOPEKAUWE.hwp

사단법인 커뮤니케이션디자인협회 시각디자인학회

연구실안전사례집-내지

50-5대지05장후은.indd

000표지

04±èºÎ¼º

감사칼럼 (제131호) 다. 미국과 일본의 경제성장률(전기 대비)은 2010년 1/4분기 각각 0.9%와1.2%에서 2/4분기에는 모두 0.4%로 크게 둔화 되었다. 신흥국들도 마찬가지이다. 중국, 브라질 등 신흥국은 선진국에 비해 높은 경제성장률을 기

<C7C1B7A3C2F7C0CCC1EE20B4BABAF1C1EEB4CFBDBA20B7B1C4AA20BBE7B7CA5FBCADB9CEB1B35F28C3D6C1BE292E687770>

13.11 ①초점


국내 기업 사례에서 직무순환이 인사고과 점수와 핵심인재 선정에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구

학교폭력사건 처리과정에 개입한 전문상담교사의 경험연구

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

untitled

歯3이화진

본문01

2016년 5월호 E 세계로, 미래로 나아가는 힘. nergy 우리의 열정과 노력이 KEPCO E&C의 에너지를 만들어냅니다. C ommunication 더 현명하게, 더 여유롭게 더 건강하게, 더 적극적으로 이 세상과 소통합니다. 04 K-Message 경영 메시지

<B0A8BBE7B3EDC1FD B3E23137C8A320C6EDC1FD2E687770>

untitled


제 출 문 문화체육관광부장관 귀하 본 보고서를 문화예술분야 통계 생산 및 관리 방안 연구결과 최종 보고서로 제출합니다. 2010년 10월 숙명여자대학교 산학협력단 본 보고서는 문화체육관광부의 공식적인 견해와 다를 수 있습니다

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

Transcription:

KINAC Experience of Nuclear Security Culture Jeong-ho Lee friend25kr@kinac.re.kr

Contents 01 Background 02 Commitment to NSC (Nuclear Security Culture) 03 Framework of Korean NSC 04 Nuclear Security Education / Training 05 Nuclear Security Awareness / Index 06 Future Works 07 Closing Remarks

Background High Accident Rate Caused by? Old Airplane? Bad Culture? 3

Background International Actions and Efforts Amendment to CPPNM, Fundamental Principle F Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources Nuclear Security Summit 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016 IAEA NSS No.7 (Nuclear Security Culture) Challenges in Nuclear Security Human Factors Insider Threat, Trustworthiness, etc. Korean Nuclear Safety Culture: Since 1994 4

Commitment to NSC Technical Workshop on NSC (Sep. and Nov. 2013) Establish NSC National Implementing Guide 5

Commitment to NSC (Cont.) Regional Workshop on NSC (Dec. 2013) Share Information & Strengthen Cooperation for NSC 6 6

Basic Concept of Korean NSC Culture is NOT Regulated But, Highly Recommended and should be Cultivated Establish & Implement Policy and Guidelines for Nuclear Security Culture Encourage All Stakeholders to Participate in Nuclear Security Culture Assess & Evaluate Level of NSC Awareness Strengthen Training and Education 7

Framework of Korean NSC National NSC Policy Organizational NSC Policy Action Plans Declaration Plan Plan Implementation Operation Education & Training Maintenance NS Awareness Survey Maintenance National Implementing Guide 8

National Implementing Guide Nuclear Security Culture Implementing Guide National NSC Policy Organizational NSC Policy Action Plans Implementation Introduction - Background, Objective, Scope, Structure Concept of Nuclear Security Culture - Definition - Human Factor and Leadership - Interactions between Safety Culture and Security Culture Implementing Guide - State, Organizations, Managers and Staffs Education & Training NS Awareness Survey National Implementing Guide 9

National Implementing Guide 10

National Implementing Guide (Cont.) Fundamental Security Environment Security Policy Statement Management Structures Resources Management Self-assessment and Improvement Strict and Prudent Approach Observation and Report Prompt Reaction State Organizations Managers in Organizations Attitudes of Individuals Distribution of Responsibility Information Security Definition of Responsibilities Practices Management Qualifications and Training Motivation Performance Enhancement 11

Policy at Organization Level Policy statements - All Organizations Established each Policy Statement based on the National Implementing Guide National NSC Policy Organizational NSC Policy Action Plans Implementation Education & Training NS Awareness Survey [KHNP] [KAERI] [KNF] 12

Action Plans at Organization Level Action plans at Organization Level - Every Organizations Established each Action Plan based on Its Own Policy Statement National NSC Policy Organizational NSC Policy Action Plans Implementation Education & Training NS Awareness Survey [KHNP] [KAERI] [KNF] 13

Nuclear Security Training Physical Protection Course for Facility Operators Training Goals - Recognizing the importance of physical protection (PP) - Enhancing national nuclear security culture - Improving performance of PP personnel Legal Base - Act on Physical Protection and Radiological Emergency Requiring training for facility operators since 2012 National Policy Organizational Policy Action Plans Implementation Training and Exercise Evaluation of Awareness Level - Regulations on Physical Protection Training Requiring nuclear security training for all facility operators Requiring training service providers for PP personnel to be authorized 14

Nuclear Security Training Physical Protection Course for Facility Operators Legal Base - Training Requirement Target Audience Training Hours Training Provider All Facility Operators (except PP Personnel) 2 hours or more / yr Operators Facilities PP Personnel Initial Refresh 8 hours or more 4 hours or more / yr Institution designated by NSSC - KINAC Some part of hours can be substituted by remote training. PP Personnel - Managers / Guards / Management personnel / Technicians / CS personnel 15

Nuclear Security Education Physical Protection Course for Facility Operators Remote Training Modules (KINAC e-learning System) Type Basic Training Specialized Training Modules - Overview of Physical Protection - National Regulations on the Physical Protection - Response to Nuclear Security Event - Physical Protection during the Transport - Nuclear Security Culture - Design Basis Threat - PPS Design (I, II) - PPS Evaluation - PPS Element Detection (I, II) - PPS Element Delay - PPS Element Response 16

Nuclear Security Education Physical Protection Course for Facility Operators Training Topics (Generic + Job specific) - Security awareness - Security basics (e-leaning) CRT - Good practices - Lessons learned from security incidents Hands-on Ex. - Legal and regulatory requirements - Hands-on exercises using SETT - Professional development X-Ray CBT

Nuclear Security Exercise Objectives Verifying Operators Contingency Plans & Response Capabilities against DBT National Policy Organizational Policy Action Plans Implementation Training and Exercise Evaluation of Awareness Level Requirements Partial Scope Exercise: 2 times / yr Full Scope Exercise: 1 time / yr Exercise Plan, Result, and Self-Assessment - Prepared by Facility Operators - Submitted to Regulatory Authority Force-on-Force Exercise Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES) - Using lasers and blank cartridges to simulate actual battle 18

Nuclear Security Exercise National Policy Organizational Policy Action Plans Implementation Training and Exercise Evaluation of Awareness Level 19

Survey on Nuclear Security Awareness NS Awareness Level Measured based on surveys since 2010 - Organized by KINAC - Developed, Implemented and Analyzed by Consulting Firm (TEHNOVALUE) and University (SNU) National Policy Organizational Policy Action Plans Implementation Training and Exercise Evaluation of Awareness Level 2015 Survey - Target: KHNP (NPP Operator) - Respondents: 849 Persons (Managers and Employees) Emergency Planning Office, Nuclear Security Team, Security Guards, Cyber Security Team, HR Team, etc. - Questionnaires: 64 Questions - Method: On-line Survey - Period: Oct. 26~Nov. 6, 2015 (12 days) 20

Nuclear Security (Culture) Index How to measure Nuclear Security Culture! Conceptualize Key Elements of Nuclear Security OUTSIDE IN FACILITY 21

Survey on Nuclear Security Awareness Questionnaires Ref. NSS No.7 Belief & Attitude (7 Questions) Operation System (18 Questions) Leadership (22 Questions) Employee Behavior (9 Questions) 22

Survey on Nuclear Security Awareness Survey Results NS Awareness 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 64.1 70.0 80.0 80.7 84.9 85.3 Management Systems [84.8] 26.1% 2015 Survey Beliefs & Attitudes [86.0] Leadership Behaviour [83.8] Manager [87.1] Employee [82.8] 47.0% 26.9% NS Awareness [85.3] Employee Behaviour [88.4] Identifying deficiencies i.e. Motivation in Leadership Behaviour Deducing causes and Creating action plans by facility oper. 23

Nuclear Security Workshop Seeking for Action Items based on Nuclear Security Awareness Survey 사업소명 개선과제 추진부서 : OOO 발전본부 : 내부직원에대한출입통제강화 : OOO 부서 추진프로세스및세부활동 추진단계 현출입통제 절차분석 내부규정및 지침개정 전직원대상 변경내용공유 방호종사자 교육시행 변경된출입통제 절차피드백 세부추진활동 ( 구체적으로 ) 내부직원동선분석 문제점도출 내부직원의견수렴 방호종사자의견수렴 핵안보보완교육실시 내부인트라넷개시 방호종사자교육 시범운영을통한보수교육실시 변경된출입통제실시 모니터링실시 규정및지침개정 규제기관승인요청및보고 타부서협력 기관외부협력 시기 ( 월 ) 24

Nuclear Security Workshop Seeking for Action Items based on Nuclear Security Awareness Survey 조직및인사제도와관련된문제 직원들이핵안보수준증진에기여한부분을적절하게인정 ( 보상, 인사고과반영, 칭찬등 ) 보상제도가제대로마련되지않음 보안관련부서는기피부서임 승진등의쿼터제도가없음 보상보다는처벌제도가많음 회사의주된목적이아님 핵심원인 중요성인식이부족함 핵안보를저해하는사안들에대해자유롭게보고 ( 또는신고 ) 할수있는창구및경로가마련 창구를잘모름 홍보가부족함 방호인력충원필요 업무가강화됨 규제가강화됨 업무에대한분석이부정확함 직원들이핵안보수준증진을위한다양한제안을할수있도록장려 관심이부족함

Future Works Nuclear Security Policy Statement Survey on Nuclear Security Awareness In-depth Analysis with Focus Group Interview Feedback to Nuclear Security Policy Self-assessment Framework of NSC Localization Based on IAEA Guideline Development of Nuclear Security Culture Index 26

Closing Remarks 27

Closing Remarks 28

Thank you