한국전력사 개요

Similar documents
Current Status and Prospect of Korea’s Investment in Uzbekistan


歯1.PDF

레이아웃 1

2013<C724><B9AC><ACBD><C601><C2E4><CC9C><C0AC><B840><C9D1>(<C6F9><C6A9>).pdf

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

15_3oracle

00내지1번2번

단선도 문제점

untitled

GS건설채용브로셔-2011

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

, Analyst, , Table of contents Executive summary 3 Investment thesis Deal tracker 44 Compan

09김정식.PDF

Microsoft PowerPoint - Freebairn, John_ppt

264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부

2013 Energy Info. Korea

제 2 장 골프장의 경영

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션


Valuation (DCF Multiple ) VIII Case Study 3 1 NOA, IBD ( 1 ) 2 ( 2 ) 3 (DCF 3 ) 4 WACC (DCF 4 ) 5 EBITDA (Multiple 3 ) 6 Multiple (Multiple 4 ) 7 ( 5

공급 에는 권역에 두개의 프라임 오피스가 준공 되었다. 청진구역 2,3지구에는 광화문 D타워가 준공되어 대림에서 약 50%를 사용하며 나머지 50%는 임대마케팅을 진행 중이다. 메트로타워는 GS건설의 사옥에서 매각 이후 2013년 4분기에 리모델링을 시작하여, 에 완공

에너지최종-수정(색변화)

공급 에는 3권역 내에 준공된 프라임 오피스가 없었다. 4분기에는 3개동의 프라임 오피스가 신규로 준공 될 예정이다.(사옥1개동, 임대용 오피스 2개동) 수요와 공실률 2014년 10월 한국은행이 발표한 자료에 따르면 한국의 2014년 경제성장률 예측치는 3.5%로 지

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

에너지통계연보(2003)

<B1B9C1A6B0B3B9DFC7F9B7C25FC3B9B0C9C0BD5FB3BBC1F62E706466>

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

< C6AFC1FD28B1C7C7F5C1DF292E687770>

PowerChute Personal Edition v3.1.0 에이전트 사용 설명서

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

untitled

강의지침서 작성 양식

Development of culture technic for practical cultivation under structure in Gastrodia elate Blume

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<BFACB1B85F D30335FB0E6C1A6C0DAC0AFB1B8BFAA2E687770>

pdf 16..

¹Ìµå¹Ì3Â÷Àμâ

ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식3)

02신현화

Output file

삼성SDI_SR국문_최종

슬라이드 1

14.531~539(08-037).fm

1차1~6장12.9

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

05_±è½Ã¿Ł¿Ü_1130

<BAA3C6AEB3B2C1F6BFF8BBE7BEF72DB1E8B3ADBFB52DC1FD2E687770>

2

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Microsoft PowerPoint - ch03ysk2012.ppt [호환 모드]

PJTROHMPCJPS.hwp

RFID USN_K_100107

BSC Discussion 1

±¹¹® »ï¼º Ç¥Áö ¹Û

¹ýÁ¶ 12¿ù ¼öÁ¤.PDF

<3136C1FD31C8A320C5EBC7D52E687770>

12Á¶±ÔÈŁ

<BCF6BDC D31385FB0EDBCD3B5B5B7CEC8DEB0D4C5B8BFEEB5B5C0D4B1B8BBF3BFACB1B85FB1C7BFB5C0CE2E687770>

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

歯주5일본문.PDF

민속지_이건욱T 최종

2015 Energy Info Korea

< FC3E2C0E5BAB8B0EDBCAD5FB1C7BFB5C0CE2E687770>

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

......(N)

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

국내 디지털콘텐츠산업의 Global화 전략

07_À±¿ø±æ3ÀüºÎ¼öÁ¤

수신




에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 학술 전력시장가격에대한역사적요인분해 * 35

??윕햳??

歯kjmh2004v13n1.PDF

13.11 ①초점


<C1B6BBE7BFACB1B D303428B1E8BEF0BEC B8F1C2F7292E687770>

001지식백서_4도


2.BFL_63호 정준혁

<28BCF6BDC D B0E6B1E2B5B520C1F6BFAABAB020BFA9BCBAC0CFC0DAB8AE20C1A4C3A520C3DFC1F8C0FCB7AB5FC3D6C1BE E E687770>

OD..Network....( ).hwp

37 동대문구 청량리8 추진위 청량리동 ,314 재개발 38 성북구 돈암6 추진위 돈암동 ,050 재개발 39 성북구 동소문2 조합 동소문2가 33 20,657 재개발 40 성북구 동선1 추진위 돈암동 ,235 재개발 41 성북구

Main Title

뉴욕 이코노믹클럽 연설을 통하여 비둘기파적 색채를 드러낸 옐런 Jr.Economist 전병하 매크로 Implication Implication 현재 상황에 대한 인식 혼조적 - R

±³º¸¸®¾óÄÚ

1

2 - ABSTRACT The object of this study is to investigate the practical effects of Senior Employment Project, implemented by government as a part of sen

MKIF_확정투자설명서_ PDF

슬라이드 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways


<C0CEBCE2BFEB5FBFACB1B85F D32322D3528BAAFBCF6C1A4295F FBCF6C1A42E687770>

<C7D1B1B9B1A4B0EDC8ABBAB8C7D0BAB85F31302D31C8A35F32C2F75F E687770>

<B0ADB9AE5F33B1C75F30315FC0CEBCE232C2F728B9DAC1D6BEF0295F FB3AAB4AEC5EBB0E85FB0B3BCB1B9E6BEC85FC3D6C1BEBAB8B0EDBCAD28C3D6C1BE295FC3D6C1BE E687770>

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Transcription:

Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO)

1 Overview of KEPCO 2 KEPCO s Growth Story 3 KEPCO s Contribution to Korean Economic Development

전력 I T 개요

1887/1898 The first electric bulb lit the loyal palace, The first electric power company was established in Korea 1950-53 Korean War - Most of generation, transmission, distribution facilities were destroyed 1961 1981 1994 Three regional electric companies were merged into a single national electric power company (KECO) with 367MW capacity T&D loss: 29.4% (1961) 6.7% (1981) Rural electrification was completed: 12% (1960) 99.3% (1981) Listed on the New York Stock Exchange USD 300 million worth of ADRs were issued * ADR: American Depositary Receipts 2009 KEPCO won $20 billion nuclear deal in the UAE

A1 (Moody s), A+ (S&P), A (Fitch) - Positive credit ratings as a state owned utility Total Asset: USD 146 billion Operating Revenue: USD 49 billion Generation Capacity: 79,341MW Twice Winner of International Edison Award by Edison Electric Institute (EEI), US (1997, 2006) - Recognition of KEPCO s world-class technology - The first of its kind outside the US Asia s No.1 Power Utility in 2008 by Platts, US

Organization Chart CEO Auditor General 6 Depts. Audit Office Vice President (domestic) Vice President (overseas) 2 Div., 9 Dept., 14 Regional Div. Nuclear Export Div. Overseas Business Div. Overseas Nuclear Project Development Dept. Nuclear EPC Project Dept. Nuclear IPP Project Dept. Overseas Project Development Dept. Overseas Project Management Dept. Overseas Resources Business Dept.

(KRW in billions) Balance Sheet Income Statement Current Assets 13,933 Revenues 49,334 Non-current Assets 132,219 Sales Other income 47,413 1,921 Total Assets Current Liabilities 146,152 18,817 Total cost Cost of sales 50,784 49,116 Non-current Liabilities 76,271 Other expenses 1,668 Total Liabilities 95,088 Operating Income 1,450 Capital Equity 51,064 Net Income 2,692

Installed Capacity Mix Actual Generation Mix 9.2% 8.3% 26% 1.3% 17.3% 4.9% 40.4% 26.1% 29.7% 35.8% 79,341MW 496,893GWh Nuclear Coal Gas Oil Hydro

- Capacity: 500-519 MW - Plant Efficiency: 39.49-43.45% - 34 Units (17,000 MW) operating - 4 Units (2,000 MW) under construction - Capacity: 814-886 MW - Plant Efficiency: 43.5-43.64 % - 2 Units (1,600 MW) operating Plant design was completed in 2007 - Design Capacity: 1000MW - Expected Plant Efficiency: 45% Dangjin Thermal Power Plant (500MW 6) Yonghung Thermal Power Plant (800MW 2)

In Operation 21 units (17,716MW) Under Construction 7 units (9,600MW) Planned 10 units (2030) (14,000MW) Seoul Ulchin 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Shin-Ulchin 1&2 (Planned) Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (To be built) Ulchin Gyeongju Wolsong Wolsong 1, 2, 3 & 4 Shin-Wolsong 1 & 2 (Under Construction) Yonggwang Kori Younggwang 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Kori 1, 2, 3 & 4 Shin-Kori 1,2,3 & 4 (Under Construction)

Korea ranks the 5th in the world in terms of the number of NPPs. after US, France, Japan, and Russia. 104 59 54 31 21 Units US France Japan Russia Korea 1 2 3 4

No.5: World 5 th Largest Nuclear Power 91%: Higher Nuclear Efficiency Rate 47 months: Shortest Construction Time 2,000$/kW: Lowest Construction Cost

T Transmission Distribution Line Length 31,249 c-km Includes HVDC (DC180kV) submarine cable of 231 c-km Voltage No. of S/S[T] No. of P.tr[D] Line Length 435,549 c-km Capacity (MVA) 765kV 6 29,116 345kV 91 111,597 154kV 644 123,226 66kV 8 434 Sungdong Migum Chungbu Seo-Incheon Sin-Yangje Dong-Seoul Youngdeungpo Incheon T/P, C/C Dangjin T/P Taean T/P Sin-Incheon Sin-Bupyung Youngseo Seo-seoul Youngheung T/P Sin-Sihung Sin-Ansan Pyungtaek T/P, C/C Sin-Dangjin Sin-seosan Boryeong T/P, C/C Youngwang N/P Sin-Gapyung Sin-Dukheun Uijeongbu Seo-Incheon C/C Yangju Hwasung Sin-suwon Ansan Sin-onyang Chungyang Sinkaedong Gunsan Sin-Okcheon Muju P/P Goryeong Sin-Gimje Sin-Namwon Sincheong P/P Sin-Hwasun Sin-Gwangju Sin-Sungnam Gonjiam Sin-Youngin Sin-Ansung Sin-Jecheon Sin-Jincheon Chungwon Gwangyang Euiryong Hadong T/P Gwangyang Steel Gwangyang C/C Sunsan Sin-Masan Samcheonpo T/P (As of Dec 31, 2012) Yangyang P/P Sin-Taebaek Sin-Youngju Donghae Sin-Youngil Cheongsong P/P Seo-Daegu Buk-Daegu Sin-Kyeongsan Ulju Daegu Sin-Ulsan Sin-Gosung Bukbusan Pusan C/C Sin-Gimhae Uljin N/P ShinPohang Wolseong N/P Ulsan TP, C/C Sin-Onsan Kori N/P Sin-Yangsan Nam-Pusan Total 749 264,373 Haenam C/S Sin-Gangjin Yeosu N/P D 22.9kV (P.tr)2.005,113 102,582 Hanrim CC Jeju T/P Namjeju

765 kv Transmission Lines

02 765 kv Substation

Low Carbon Green Growth National Policy In 2009, Green Growth Committee has announced Construction of World Class Green-Advanced Country as a national vision mentioning Smart Grid. In Dec, 2009, Korean government announced National Smart Grid Roadmap. Anticipative Power IT Technology Development Technology Development Korean government has invested $210 million in 10 Power IT Projects since 2005. In EV battery field, domestic technologies are nearly at the world top class level. In 2010, Korea started to develop Smart Grid Technologies in earnest. Jeju Smart Grid Test-bed (in August, 2009) Pilot Project Budget : $200 million ($54 million supported by the government) Period : 2009 ~ 2013 (4 Years) 5 domains, 12 consortiums Technology Demonstration / Business Model Development

EPC projects for 17 substations (Kazakhstan) EPC project for power transmission line (Kazakhstan) Consulting services for transmission line, substation, and training (Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ghana, etc.) EPC project for power distribution line (India) EPC project for power distribution line (Dominican Republic) Consulting services for loss reduction, DAS, and energy efficiency (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Laos, Uzbekistan, etc.)

전력 I T 개요

Korea, Hopeless Country Per capita GDP is less than 100 dollars. The ratio of unemployed people accounts for more than 25% of total labor population. Power generation facilities stand at only one-sixth of those of Mexico. Export is hovering around 2 million dollars, whilst import exceeds 200 million dollars. All these figures indicate that Korea s economic miracle would never happen

(Unit: MW) 79,341 Installed capacity stands at 79,341MW (as of 2012) 216 fold Increase 367 1961 2012

% 40 39.94 40.66 40.70 40.97 41.19 35 35.63 30 Efficiency (%) ***gross efficiency '80 01 03 '05 07 10

(Unit: %) Histroical Improvement (Unit: %) International Comparison 74.0 76.2 76.2 66.2 59.3 62.4 64.1 66.6 1961 2000 2011 US Japan France UK Korea

수색 부산 ³ì» ê ³²ºÎ» ê Ù ë ¹üà µ ¼ ºÎ» ê ¼ öá µ 쌍문미아 창동 상계노원 은평돈암종암휘경옥인운니녹번안암현저원남신내세종로군자흥인수색신촌화양아현서대문신당마장가양연대서소문왕십리광장상암당인리순화중앙성동화곡양천마포풍납양평용산여의한남뚝도중부선릉구의강동목동의사당문래동빙고보광삼성신사역곡영등포오류서초대치잠실송파온수노들노량진구로반포신양재가락신길양지도곡독산사당개포수서교대구공대방시흥염곡 녹산 구서북부산명장구포미남동래덕포모라범천양정서부산개금서면수정엄궁동부산신평부민부산남부산부산T/P 영도 다대 수영좌동 Asia s first 765kV Transmission line World s first Double circuit 765kV Transmission line World s first 765kV with full-gis substation Power Network (1965) 문산 부평서울T/P 화천H/P 청평H/P 덕소영월T/P 천안상주남대전대구진영삼계 Power Network (2011) 문산전곡상남주문진동두천포천춘천H/P 소양강H/P 덕계금오춘천금촌송우가평녹양남춘천의정부서인천강화 C/C 양주도봉청평의암 H/P H/P 강릉H/P 강릉송포진접불광영동T/P 양곡일산C/C 서인천일산지도구리마석청평양수신가평경서계양인천T/P 북인천임학능곡한화T/P 덕소팔당H/P 홍천횡계안인신부평미금영종송월신현부천C/C 신장영종C/C 송현부흥중동신공항동해남인천신인천주안부개부천광명만수횡성평창성남동서울관교연수소래평촌과천초월원미남동영서북평동춘안양야탑성현분당동해T/P 북시화안양신시흥동안양 C/C 분당C/C 의왕서시화산본반월신성남삼척남시화우만수지안산율전율현이원시화목내일동반월C/C 용인이천원주사강서서울서수원동수원송포동탄남수원신용인여주남원주신갈영흥T/P 문막정선발안오산신안성영월T/P 태백당진화성평택 T/P 신태백 C/C 평택울진평택T/P 송탄안성대산감곡 #1,2 울진 #3,4 N/P 한보철강송악포승충주H/P 제천성연개폐소원정충주당진서천안만승태안T/P 둔포금왕음성신제천인주성거신진천단양봉화신당진탕정천안영주태안서산아산진천장연안면동천안풍동온양증평신서산오창신영주예산전의봉명평해홍성조치원서청주사직청주예천안동H/P 점촌안동신풍진보공주월산죽림청원임하H/P 부강청양대청T/P 동안동신일보은상주관창덕진신계룡유성대덕신탄진둔산대화영덕가수원동대전신흥보령T/P 서대전유천두마남대전신옥천보령C/C 대천부여의성옥산논산옥천고아군위청하서천T/P 영동김천구미은진금산남구미인동선산상정북포항장항함열구암군산T/P 동군산남인동남포항영등무주구미열병합서군산칠곡관음팔달군공이리영천포항내초북전주용담진안 Hydraulic 팔봉무주P/P 서대구침산검단공평천북와룡산격영일내당안심달서성주동인효목태평강창남대구반야월김제전주아화상정성서봉덕범물노변동전주달성상인경주신포항부안다산신김제남전주논공진량직동신경산 #1,2 #3,4 거창고령섬진강임실청도외동월성N/P 유가정공울주매암북울산효문정주함양합천언양울산방어진옥동고창밀양영남T/P 남원산청합천H/P 의령용연초동창녕 #1,2 담양신남원삼랑진신울산처용 P/P 산막웅촌울산T/P 영광#5,6 #3,4 N/P 칠서서창온산양산신온산홍농 #3,4 영광곡성구룡신마산진영 #1,2 장성이현호포고리N/P 신월하남비아일곡가야차룡신김해마산북광주창공삼계기장신광주산청P/P 계림진주중리수출신양산평동농성충장월림완암장유소태삼정남광주하동개양진동운남화순구례사천나주태금하동T/P 서마산진해마천매월엄다삼천포고성순천광양신고성목포신화순안정주암H/P 서순천북항대불영암벌교율촌용성호남T/P 삼천포T/P 여천여수남해 T/P 충무거제아주신강진여수강진장흥고흥 진도 해남남창 해남변환소완도 운천 철원화천H/P 간성 인제 속초 양양 154kV System: 산지 ( 제주변환소 ) 한림C/C 신제주동제주성산안덕한라남제주신서귀 T/P 154kV System: 345kV System: 765kV System:

Source side 3.3, 6.6, 11.4 kv (1960s) 22.9 kv (2000s) Customer side Light 220V 110V Motor 380V 220V

(Unit: %) Historical Improvement (Unit: %) International Comparison 29.3 8.9 6.1 6.7 6.7 3.7 5.1 4.8 3.7 1961 2000 2012 UK US France Japan Taiwan Korea

1950s 1960~70s 1980~90s 2000s Korean War (Social Disorder) 41.7% (1957) Voltage Conversion Started (1963) & Anti-pilferage 19.21% (1965) Introduction of Low Loss Materials 5.89% (1985) Voltage Conversion Completed (2005) & AMR System 3.69% (2012)

Technical Loss Transmission & Distribution Voltage Conversion Use of Low Loss Materials Power Factor Management Use of Computerized Tool (Voltage Drop & Loss Calculation) Non-technical Loss Introduction of AMR (Automatic Meter Reading system) Prevention of Pilferage Delinquent Payment Charge (2% Surcharge) Correct Meter Reading & Billing

SAIDI Improvement International Comparison (Unit: Minutes) Outage time (Unit: Minutes) 137 454 295 56.6 68 39.2 21.5 12.4 12.4 30.2 1986 1990 1995 2000 2012 Korea Taiwan France UK US

Field work Cut Out Switch Manipulation Jumper Cable Connection Cable Loading Vehicle By pass Cable Arrangement

KEPCO DAS Strengths High Reliability - Decades of stable operation at home and abroad Open System Architecture - Easy adoption of new systems using Middleware Effective Application - FLISR, Protective coordination, network optimization High Adaptability to Communication Methods - Fiber optic, CDMA, GSM/GPRS, TRS, etc. Reduced Interruption Duration Remarkable reduction of outage time with FLISR - 53min. 3 min. Technical loss reduction and load factor improvement by grid optimization Automatic acquisition of real-time network data 53min. 3min. Before After Outage time

DAS Configuration

Electricity Tariff (Unit: US ) (250% increase) 120.5 Consumer Price index 48.1 88.4 6.5 Electricity Tariff 6.3 7.9 (21% increase) 1986 1996 2012

International Comparison 13.2 (Unit: US / kwh) * Source: International Energy Agency 11.5 12.0 7.9 8.6 Korea US France UK Japan Korea imports 99% of generation fuel from abroad Although KEPCO offers one of the lowest tariffs in the world, it still enjoys 49.1% of equity to debt ratio (Global utilities averaged debt ratio level is over 200%)

한국전력의전력 IT 현황

Rural Electrification Rate 99.3% 25.5% 1964 1981 (Unit: %)

66kV T/L Construction in 1962 in Central Seoul Rural Electrification in 1969

Strong Public-Private Partnership - Voltage conversion & simplification (220V / 22.9kV) - Standardization of technical specification - Special law and regulation to facilitate the rural electrification - Push on power development under strong leadership Emphasis on Training and Knowledge Sharing - Employee training in the technologically advanced organizations - Joint study & information exchange with developed countries - Huge and steady investment in H.R.D Relatively Clean and Transparent Organization Culture

Knowledge and Experience Sharing Mechanism Employees could learn know-hows and skills from experts in KEPCO Academy KEPRI (KEPCO Research Institute) played a significant role in sharing and disseminating information on new technologies KEPCO Employees Higher Loyalty to Their Organization Work-oriented mindset stemmed from life-long employment system Tend to consider themselves as the owner of the company rather than being employed by the company Peaceful and Constructive Labor-Management Relationship Maintain communication channel between Labor Union and Management Partnership based upon trust, cooperation, concession and mutual understanding

Based upon discussions so far we can come to conclude that KEPCO has successfully overcome a variety of challenges in developing its technologies and skills over the past 4 decades and has made itself one of the world-leading power companies. KEPCO wishes to share knowledge and experience and transfer technologies and skills to people living in developing countries to help ease their sufferings from the shortage of electric power. Through these supportive and contributive activities, KEPCO will continue to play a pivotal role in not only enhancing the quality of life but also bringing our fellow people more prosperous and brighter future.