ๆญฏ PDF

Similar documents
์ง€๋ฐฉ์ž์น˜์‹œ๋Œ€์˜ ์ •์ฑ…๊ฐˆ๋“ฑ ๋ถ„์„

์˜์ •์—ฐ๊ตฌ_36ํ˜ธ_0828.hwp

๋ฏผ์ฃผ์žฅ์ • 100๋…„, ๊ด‘์ฃผ ์ „๋‚จ์ง€์—ญ ์‚ฌํšŒ์šด๋™ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ด ๋ก  ๋‚˜๊ฐ„์ฑ„

๋ด„ํ˜ธ.PDF

<3031C8ABB5E6C7A52E687770>

Microsoft Word - NEW08_prof. Ma

1-3-2 ์œค๊ธฐ์›…, ๊น€์ง„์˜, ๊ณต๋™์„ฑ.hwp

์š” ์•ฝ ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋ฏผ๊ตญ์€ 1948๋…„ ์ •๋ถ€์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ ์ดํ›„ 60๋…„ ๋งŒ์— ์„ธ๊ณ„ 13์œ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์ œ๋Œ€๊ตญ์œผ๋กœ ๋น„์•ฝ์ ์ธ ์„ฑ ์žฅ์„ ์ด๋ฃจ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •๋ถ€์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ 2๋…„ ๋งŒ์— ๋ถํ•œ์˜ ์ „๊ฒฉ ๋‚จ์นจ์œผ๋กœ ์ „ ๊ตญํ† ๊ฐ€ ์ดˆํ† ํ™”๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ , ํœด ์ „ ์ดํ›„์—๋„ ์•ˆ๋ณด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์œ„ํ˜‘์€ ๊ณ„์†๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋ฏผ๊ตญ ๊ตญ๋ฏผ์€ ๋ถˆ๋ฆฌํ•œ ์—ฌ๊ฑด์— ์ขŒ์ ˆํ•˜

5-๊น€์žฌ์ฒ 

<B9DABCBCC1A45FBCB1B9CCBCF6C1A42E687770>

09

<3132B1C732C8A328C0DBBEF7292E687770>

<30312DC8ABBDC2C7E52E687770>

1-2-2ํ•˜ํƒœ์ˆ˜.hwp

6.์žฅ์šฐ์˜๋…ผ๋ฌธ

์กฐ์žฌ์šฑD)-63-88

<302DC5EBC0CFB0FA20C6F2C8AD28BFCF292E687770>

2016-๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ด„-6-์ •์€์ˆ™( ).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

๊ตญ์ œ๋ฌด์—ญ๋ก -02์žฅ

ePapyrus PDF Document

ๅคง ้Ÿ“ ๆ”ฟ ๆฒป ๅญธ ๆœƒ ๅ ฑ ( ็ฌฌ 23่ผฏ 1 ่™Ÿ ) ๋œ์ง€ ์˜ค๋ž˜๋‹ค. ๊ตญํšŒ๊ฐ€ ๋ณธ์—ฐ์˜ ์ž„๋ฌด๋ฅผ ๋‹ค ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฌผ๋ก  ์˜ํšŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ตญ๋ฏผ๋“ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ถˆ์‹  ๋ฐ›๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ๋งŒ์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๊ตญ๋ฏผ๋“ค์ด ๊ตญํšŒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถˆ์‹ ์ด ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ํฌ๋ฉฐ ์—…๋ฌด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ์•„์ฃผ ๋ถ€์ •์ ์œผ

<3036C0CCBCB1BFEC2E687770>

<30315FC0CCB5BFC1D65FC7D1B1B9BCBAB8C5B8C52E687770>

1) ์ด๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ 2009 ๋…„๋„์„ฑ์‹ ์—ฌ์ž๋Œ€ํ•™๊ตํ•™์ˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์กฐ์„ฑ๋น„์ง€์›์—์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ์Œ. 2) Francis Fukuyama, "The End of History," National Interest, No. 16 (Summer 1989), p. 4. 3) ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ๊ตฌ๋ถ„์—๊ด€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š”์กด๋ฒ ์ผ๋ฆฌ์Šค

< C7CFB9DDB1E22028C6EDC1FD292E687770>

3.ํ™ฉ์•„๋ž€

2 ๅคง ้Ÿ“ ๆ”ฟ ๆฒป ๅญธ ๆœƒ ๅ ฑ ( ็ฌฌ 18 ่ผฏ 1 ่™Ÿ ) ๊ณผ์˜ ์†Œํ†ต๋ถ€์žฌ ์†์— ์—ฌ๋‹น๊ณผ ๊ตญํšŒ๋„ ๋ฌด์‹œํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐฉ์ ์ธ ๋ฐ€์–ด๋ถ™์ด๊ธฐ์‹ ๊ตญ์ •์šด์˜์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์ฃผ์˜๊ฐ€ ๋ฌด์—‡์ธ์ง€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋…ผ์˜๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ, ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์ฃผ์˜ ์šด์˜์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ์˜ ์ œ๋„์  ์กฐ๊ฑด์€ ๊ถŒ๋ ฅ ํ–‰์‚ฌ์—์„œ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€๊ธฐ๊ด€ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜

ADU


*5ยฃ00รŒยฝร…รˆ๏ฟฝ

2014 ์ž๊ฒฉ์—ฐ์ˆ˜ ์ œ1๊ธฐ_์ˆ˜์ •.hwp

_ _ Reading and Research in Archaeology. _ Reading and Research in Korean Historical Texts,,,,,. _Reading and Research in Historical Materials from Ko



์•„ํƒœ์—ฐ๊ตฌ(์†ก์„์›) hwp

1.,..,..,..,.,.,,.

๋Œ€์ค‘.PDF

<30315FB1E2C8B9B3EDB4DC B0A1C0BBC8A3295FB1E8C1DFC8A32E687770>

๋…ธํ›„ ์†Œ๋“๋ณด์žฅ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ๊ฐœํ˜์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

ๆญฏํ‘œ์ง€.PDF

์ฃผ๋ฅ˜-๋น„์ฃผ๋ฅ˜ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์œผ๋กœ ๋ณธ 19๋Œ€ ๋Œ€์„ ๊ตฌ๋„ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์ขŒํด๋ฆญ-์šฐํด๋ฆญ ๋…ผ์Ÿ ๋„˜์–ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋Œ€์„ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹ ํ•„์š” ๋‹จ์ผ๋Œ€์ƒ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„์˜ ๋„˜์–ด ๋“€์–ผ ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ํ•„์š” ๋ณธ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ๋Š” <๋ฐ์ผ๋ฆฌํ•œ๊ตญ>์— ๊ธฐ๊ณ ํ•œ 2017 ๋Œ€์„ , ์ขŒํด๋ฆญ-์šฐํด๋ฆญ ๋…ผ์Ÿ ๋„˜์–ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋“€์–ผ ์ „๋žต ํ•„์š” ์˜ ์›๋ณธ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ์ด๋‹ค(2015๋…„

07_ร€ยฑยฟรธยฑรฆ3ร€รผยบรŽยผรถรยค

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

ใ…ใ…ใ…ใ…ํ†ต๊ณ„์ง€์‹๊ณผ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์  ์ƒ์ƒ์˜ ๊ตฌ์ถ•

์ผ๋ฐ˜๋…ผ๋ฌธ ํ–‰์ •๋…ผ์ด ์ œ 49 ๊ถŒ์ œ 1 ํ˜ธ ( ): 139~165 ์˜์•ฝํ’ˆ๋ฆฌ๋ฒ ์ดํŠธ์ž์œจ๊ทœ์ œ์˜ํ•œ๊ณ„ : ์ œ๋„๋ก ์ ์ ‘๊ทผ โ… . ์„œ๋ก  โ…ก. ์ด๋ก ์ ๊ณ ์ฐฐ โ…ข. ์˜์•ฝํ’ˆ๋ฆฌ๋ฒ ์ดํŠธ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ถ„์„ < ็›ฎๆฌก > โ…ฃ. ์ด๋ก ์ ์‹œ์‚ฌ์  โ…ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก  < ์š”์•ฝ > โ… . ์„œ๋ก  **. 1

IDP www idp or kr IDP ์ •์ฑ…์—ฐ๊ตฌ ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ฒฝ์ œ์˜๊ตฌ์กฐ์ ๋ฌธ์ œ์™€๊ฐœํ˜๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๋ฏผ์ฃผ์ •์ฑ…์—ฐ๊ตฌ์› The Institute for Democracy and Policies

์ค‘๊ฒฌ๊ตญ์™ธ๊ต์—ฐ๊ตฌํšŒ

์„์‚ฌ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ณ„ํš์„œ

1-๊ตญ๊ฐ€๋ด„-๋ฐ•์˜์ค€(5-37).hwp

<B9CEC1D6C1A4C3A5BFACB1B8BFF82DBBE7B6F7B0FAC1A4C3A5BABDC8A328C6EDC1FD292E687770>

?6๏ฆญ็‹™

< BBF3B9DDB1E228C6EDC1FD292E687770>

06_ร€รŒยผยบยปรณ_0929

13.11 โ‘ ์ดˆ์ 

๋Œ€๊ตฌ์ „์‹œ์ปจ๋ฒค์…˜์„ผํ„ฐ ์ „์‹œํ–‰์‚ฌ์˜ ์ง€์—ญ๊ฒฝ์ œ ํŒŒ๊ธ‰ํšจ๊ณผ ๋ถ„์„

2

<C5EBC0CFBFACB1B8BFF85F4B494E5520C5EBC0CFC7C3B7AFBDBA2832C8A3295FB3BBC1F628C0FCC3BC295F37C2F75F E687770>


<C7F6B4EBBACFC7D1BFACB1B F3136B1C72032C8A3292E687770>

รธยฉยบโˆซโˆžห™ โˆžรŠรธยต0

, (, 2000) (public management),,, ( ), (Parasuraman, 1988), Lacobucci(1996) (consumer evaluation),,, ( ) ( E x p e c t a t i o n ) (, 2001) Parasurama

BEAA hwp

๋ถ€๋ฌธ๋ณ„ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์› ์ˆ˜์š”์˜ ๋ณ€๋™ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๊ณตํ†ต๋ณ€๋™์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฑฐ์‹œ์  ์š”์ธ๋“ค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ ๋ถ„์„

์ตœ์ข…ok-1-4.hwp

<3133B1C732C8A328BCF6C1A4292E687770>

G20 ์ œ1์ฐจ ์ •์ƒํšŒ์˜ : ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ์›Œ์‹ฑํ„ด D.C.( ) ์ฐธ๊ฐ€๊ตญ(๊ธฐ๊ตฌ) G20 ํšŒ์›๊ตญ : G7 ํ•œ๊ตญ ์ค‘๊ตญ ์ธ๋„ ํ˜ธ์ฃผ ๋ธŒ๋ผ์งˆ ๋ฉ•์‹œ์ฝ” ์ธ๋„๋„ค์‹œ์•„ ์•„๋ฅดํ—จํ‹ฐ๋‚˜ ๋Ÿฌ์‹œ์•„ ํ„ฐํ‚ค ์‚ฌ์šฐ๋””์•„๋ผ๋น„์•„ ๋‚จ์•„ํ”„๋ฆฌ์นด๊ณตํ™”๊ตญ ์˜์žฅ๊ตญ(ํ”„๋ž‘์Šค) ์ŠคํŽ˜์ธ ๋„ค๋œ๋ž€๋“œ ๊ตญ ์ œ ๊ธฐ ๊ตฌ : UN I

<B1B9B9CEC5EBC7D5C0BB20C0A7C7D120C0CCB3E4B0A5B5EE20C1F8B4DCB0FA20B1B9C8B8C0C720BFAAC7D220B8F0BBF62E687770>

๋ด„ํ˜ธ.PDF


untitled

<312D303620B0F8B0F8B0A5B5EEB0FCB8AEBDC3BDBAC5DBB1B8C3E02E687770>

264 ์ถ•๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฒฐ์ธก์น˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๋Ÿ‰ ์ง‘๊ณ„๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์šฉ์ ๊ธฐ์ค€์—์„œ ์ค‘๋Ÿ‰๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€๊ฒฝ๋˜์–ด ์ž๋ฃŒ ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์ œํ•œ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ 1995๋…„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์“ฐ๋ ˆ๊ธฐ ์ข… ๋Ÿ‰์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋„์ž…๋˜์–ด ์ƒํ™œํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํฌ ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์–ด๋“ค์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋ฏ€๋กœ 1996๋…„๋ถ€

Theoretical foundation for the ethics of coaching sport Sungjoo Park* Kookmin University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:

ยผ๏ฟฝรˆยซยผยฎ รƒรขยทร‚

ๆญฏ๋ฐ•ํšจ์ข…1-1.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design


<3037C0CCC8AFB9FC5FC0CCBCF6C3A22E687770>

<BAF1BBF3B1E2C8B9BAB C8A3295F317E32B4DCB6F42E717864>

Microsoft Word - 21KR_Proceeding_2009_

์ฐจ ๋ก€... ๋ฐ•์˜๋ชฉ **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

ยฑยนรยฆร†รฒรˆล4ยฑร‡1รˆยฃ-รƒร–รยพ

h99-37.PDF

์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ํฌ์ปค์Šค (์ œ2๊ถŒ ์ œ2ํ˜ธ ํ†ต๊ถŒ12ํ˜ธ, ยท4)

๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต์œก151ํ˜ธ-ํ•ฉ์นจ

์š” ์•ฝ ์ œํ’ˆํ˜์‹ ์€ ๊ธฐ์—… ์ƒ์กด์˜ ์—ด์‡ ์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๊ทธ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋ฏธํกํ•˜๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์—…์˜ ์ œํ’ˆํ˜ ์‹  ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” R&D ์ง‘์•ฝ๋„๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ธฐ์—…์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ 2005๋…„ 3.2%๋กœ OECD 30๊ฐœ๊ตญ ์ค‘ 4์œ„์ด ์ง€๋งŒ, ์ œํ’ˆํ˜์‹  ํ™œ๋™์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋†’์€ ์ฐจ์›์˜ ํ˜์‹ ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ธฐ์—… ๋น„์œจ

์ง€๋‚œ 2009๋…„ 11์›” ์• ํ”Œ์˜ ์•„์ดํฐ ์ถœ์‹œ๋กœ ๋Œ€์ค‘ํ™”์— ์ ‘์–ด๋“  ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ์˜ ์—ญ์‚ฌ๋Š” 4๋…„ ๋งŒ์— โ€˜1์ธ 1์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ ์‹œ๋Œ€โ€™๋ฅผ ๋ˆˆ์•ž์— ๋‘๋ฉด์„œ ๋ชจ๋ฐ”์ผ ์ตœ๊ฐ•๊ตญ์˜ ๊ฟˆ์„ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•ด ๊ฐ€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

I. 2

์›๊ณ ์Šคํƒ€์ผ ์ •์˜

ยจรซ รรถยธยฎร‡รรˆยธรรถ-ยผร›ยฐรฆยพรฐOK

<3133B1C733C8A328C0DBBEF7292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

<5B31362E30332E31315D20C5EBC7D5B0C7B0ADC1F5C1F8BBE7BEF720BEC8B3BB2DB1DDBFAC2E687770>

15_3oracle

4.๊ธฐํšํŠน์ง‘5-์ตœ์ข…

์ •๋„์™€ ๋ฐœํ™” ํ–‰๋™ ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋Š” ์ž์—ฐํ™”๋œ ์ธ์‹๋ก ์˜ ํƒ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ฝฐ์ธ์˜ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์„ค๋ช…์€ ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์˜๋ฌธ์„ ๋‚จ๊ธด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์€ ๊ณผํ•™์ž๋“ค์ด ์‚ฐ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๋…ผ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์•„์˜ˆ ์˜์‹ฌ์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„ ๋ฐ– ์— ๋‘๋Š” ์ด์œ ์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œ๋Š” ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ์ •๋„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ, ์›๋ฆฌ์ ์ธ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜๊ณ 

PDF

์—ฐํ•ฉํ•™์ˆ ๋Œ€ํšŒ(๊ตญ๋ฏผ์—ฐ๊ธˆ์œค์„๋ช…1008)ff.hwp

Transcription:

(The Storming Upon Us : Social Conflicts in South Korea) 2001. 4

1 1? 1. 5 2. 11 3.? 18 2 1. 31 2. 40 3. 62 3. 71. 90. 121. 134. 151. 164. 175 4 1. 191 2. 201 211

< -1> 10 75 < -2> 1 76 < -3> 2000 11 11 78 < -4> 79 < -5> 88 < -6> 92 < -7> 5, 6, 7 95 < -8> 13 (1987 ) 97 < -9> 14 (1992 ) 98 < -10> 15 (1997 ) 98 < -11> 102 < -12> 109 < -13> 20 ( ) 112 < -14> 119 < -15> 128 < -16> IMF 139 < -17> (1998.2 2000.9) 142 < -18> 4 144 < -19> 156 < -20> 167 < -21> 12 170 < -22> : vs 173 < -23> 173 < -24> 177 < -25> 180

< -1> 15 < -2> 21 < -3> 23 < -4> 25 < -5> 28 < -1> 33 < -2> 36 < -3> 44 < -1> 80 < -2> 84 < -3> 86 < -4> 99 < -5> 100 < -6> 1960 (%) 102 < -7> 104 < -8> 1987 106 < -9> 108 < -10> 1 (PGRD) (1995 ) 113 < -11> 115 < -12> 123 < -13> 129 < -14> 131 < -15> 136 < -16> 140 < -17> 168 < -18> 181 < -19> 182 < -1> 194 < -2> 199 < -3> 206

1,,.,?...,.,,.

?

I.? 5 1? 1. 1).......,.,????,.,

6 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).... 1)........,. 1),..

I.? 7...,...,,.,...,..,. 2) 4. 1. 2

8 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,. 3 7. - -.,,,. 4 (2 ) (3 ).,,,...,... 1) 2) 3) :, 3, 4) :,,, 5) :

I.? 9 5, (relevant groups), (sources), (perceptions), (state role),..,. 1.....,.,,,.,,..,,,..,

10 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,.,.....,,,.,,..,.,.....,,.

I.? 11,.. 2. 1)?,,,,,,,,....,.,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,.,,,,.,,,,.

12 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)..,..,.,.,, (mechanism)...,...,.....

I.? 13. (plurality) (integration),..,.,,... (quality). 21,,. ( ),,... 2).

14 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)....? 2) (inevitable tension).,,,. (cognition), (emotion), (behavior),.,,,,.,,,,.,,,,.., (reciprocity).. 2) confligere, con ( ) fligere (,, ). (homo conflitus).

I.? 15.., (ubiquitous).,., (intensity)..,....,,. 3)?,,,,. < - 1>

16 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,,.,.,,,. 3,... 3).... (manifest interests).,,,,. 3) 6,, 3 3,,.

I.? 17,...,,.,,. 4),,.,... (mechanism),,......,,,,

18 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,,,.,,..,,. 1960.,.,,. 3.? 1)..,....

I.? 19...,...,...,.,....,,,.,.. (prisoner 's dilemma)..

20 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),..,....,..,.,.,,...

I.? 21 2).,,.,.,,,..,.,,,. < - 2>

22 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < -2>.,,,,.,..,,,,.,... 3. ( ) ( ), ( ),,, A, B, C....,... < -3>.. 4) (possibility) 4) (pareto optimality)

I.? 23.. abc A B. E abc. oec 45,, Eac A, Ebc B. oec. < - 3>. (win-win game) (rules of game)..

24 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 3).,?,.,,..?,,,..,.....,.,.,.,..

I.? 25,...,.,.,...,.. < - 4>

26 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < -4>.,.,... 5) (degree of multi-formed heterogeneity),,..,,...,.. 5).

I.? 27,,.....,.,..,,...,. < - 5>.,,.

28 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),.,,,. 3.,.,,,. < - 5>

. 31 2 1. 1),...,,,,.,,.,,.,. (rent- seeking),,.,

32 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,.,,.. (state-building),, (structural trauma)... 1,.,., (mechanism)....,..

. 33..,.,,.,,. < - 1> S : (state capacity) T : (tolerance level) C : (social conflicts) M : (management level),, < - 1>.

34 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),.. (T) (M)...,,..,.,,.,..,,,,,.,.,,.

. 35....,.,.,.. 2).,,.. 1987 6.29. 80.,.,,,.,,,.

36 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 2> 1, 2 : 3,4 : 5 : 6 : : :,,,,.,,...,.,.

. 37,.,.,.,. 1980 1990.,...,,,.,,.,,,.,.

38 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),,..,. 1960 1970,. 1980 1990....,.... 6.29. 3..

. 39,...,,...,.,..,....,,,,.,,,. 20 80.

40 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,....,... 2. 1),,,,.,,. (IMF) 1998, 1999

. 41, 2000,.. 1999 1999. 1998 43 2000 48, 2 (OECD, 1999),.,,.,,,,... (GDP),. IMF 1999,,,,.,,,.,., 1996, 1999. 1999.,

42 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,,.,. 6) 30,,....,,,,,,.,... 7).. 6),. 1980.. 7)....

. 43,.. 8) 2),,,,,,,,......... 1998., 8)..

44 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,,. < - 3>.,,. < -8>..

. 45 (1)...,.,,,. 9)..,....,.,.,.,. 10) 9) 3 3.,,.. 10).

46 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)..,.....,....,..,.,.

. 47. 3..,.... 11).... 12).,. 11)... 12)..,...

48 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)...,,........... 13)..... 13),.

. 49 (2) 1987,.,...,....,,,,,...,..

50 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)....,....,...,.

. 51 (3),. UR,.,,.,,.,..,.,,.....,,., 4, 10 1 14..

52 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),.,.,. (4),,...,. 8 25%.... 28.. 1..

. 53 (3 ). 50% 80%.. 14). 30.. 7 5 1...,.. 80. 5 87 4 11.,. 6 93 12 58 10... 15) 14) 1. 15)

54 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 96 6....,.,..,..,,......,..,.

. 55...,,.....,,.,.. (5) - 1987,...

56 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),.,...,......,,..,.,.,..

. 57.... (6).....,,,..,.?..,..,

58 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).. 40%, 80%.,.....,.. 16),..,.,.,., 16).

. 59.,,...... (7),.,. 17),.,,. 17) (NIMBY: not in my back yards syndrome),..

60 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)..,....,,,.,.,.,..,.,.,.

. 61,,,.,....,.,,.,.,.,..,,.,..

62 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). 3. 1).,,.,,,,...,.,.,.,,..,.

. 63.,. 96 99 3/4 96 25% 25% 4.6. 99 3/4 25% 25% 9.5...., 98 1 1 1 2000 3 16 4. 2 13.8.,...,.. 97 1/4 99 3/4 20% 100, 20% 97 23.2 99 3/4 18.9. 20% 100 20% 18.9 5.. 5.

64 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea), 97 0.283. 98 0.316 99 0.320. 2000 1/4 0.325. 20% 20% 97 4.49 98 5.41, 99 5.49 2000 1/4 5.56.,. (, 2000. 3), 97 0.399, 98 0.440, 99 0.437, (0.319).. 1997 71.7% 1998 53.4%. 2000.. 97 36.7% 2 13.4%..,. 1. 149, 850,. 97 68.5% 98 65.7%, 99 64.8%, 20%, 80% 20 80.?.,. 53%

. 65...,,,,.... 98 0.440, 0.374. 0.066 0.157, 0.111...,...,.,,.

66 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 2),......,.,.,......

. 67.........,,,.

.....................

. : 71. 1. 1999 2000 1,.,.,.. 2000 11 11..,..,,,...,.

72 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 2. 1) 1963, 37. 1982 7 3,,. 1987 1991. 1999 12, 2000 7 1.. (1) ; 1963, 1982 3. 1965 1966. 1977.. 1981 2, 9. 1982,, 3 2 ( ).

. : 73 1984 5 1 12 31. 18) 1985.,,,. (2) ; 1987 3. 1989,. 1991. 1991 11. 1993. 1993 10 1994. 1999 7. 1996 11,,. 1998 5.,. 18) (1991) 3.

74 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 1999 2 1 2. 4 5 10. 6 9 17.. 11 15,, 12 27. 11 30, 1. (3) ;. 2000 2 17 2.. 78%,.. 4 1 6%, 4 4 6.. 5 21, 10. 6 4, 3. 6 13,. 6 15. 1, 2, 3.

. : 75 < - 1> 10 FDA ( 30 ) 50%, (4. 6 ) 1 6 20 25 6.. 6 21, -. 6 23,.,. 6 24, 7.. 19) 6 25,. 6 26. 19), 39 2., 2 6. 6..

76 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 2> 1 PTP, Foil 30, 6. 7 10 6,,,,. 1, 7 13, 8 1. 7 29. 8 7, 8 10 63%. 8. 2.

. : 77,.,. 9.. 8 9, 80% 2.,. 8 11. 8 24.,. 9, 9 24,. 9 26,. 10 5,. 20) 20)

78 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 10 6 3. 3. (4) ; 9 26. 10 6 3,. 10 24 3. 24 11 11, 3. 11 8. < - 3> 2000 11 11,, 6 60% 40% : 11 13. 10 6 87%, 6%, 50%, 43%.( 10 2 )

. : 79.,,, 9.,,,.,. < - 4> - - E. -,, - - 50% 2001 2005 2 3% 40% - - 15% - 10% 30% : 11 13. -

80 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 1> 2) (1)....,.

. : 81. 1980..,.(, 2000)..,,.. 21)....,.. 21) 1962.(, 2000)

82 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).... (2),,,,.,.,.. (, 2000)..,.

. : 83. 2 3..,....,. (, 2000).,,. 2/3 20 30...,...,.

84 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)... < - 2> 3. 1),. 1977 50 55%, 1998 64.8%..

. : 85,,, ( 3 )..,.,,..,.. 2).., 1987 50%.,....

86 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 3)...,,,,. 3,.,... < - 3>.,

. : 87....,.,..... 4. 1)...

88 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 5> 1 2 3 /,,,, 3.... 2) (1)..

. : 89....,,..,... ( )...(, 2000) (2)......

90 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). 1.., 22). 23).....,,.. 22). (, 1999) 23) (1997).

. : 91 2. 1) (1) (, regional conflict) ( ).. ( ),.. 24).. (2)... 24).

92 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)....,..... < - 6>,

. : 93 2) (1) ; 8. ( ) ( ). 25).. 12,,, (parochial).., (regional discrimination)...,. 25) 2 3.(, 1996)

94 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).. 26).. 1950. 27). 28) 1960.., 1960 23.8% 1995 11.1% 12.7% 600. 29).. 1960.. 26),,.(, 1991) 27) 1945 100, 113.6, 1990 100 219.7.(, 1996) 28). 29) (1996).

. : 95 (2) ; 1967 6. 1963. 1963,. 1967... 1971. 30) < - 7> 5, 6, 7 : 1963 (30.2%), (33.1) (65.1%), (56.9%). :, 30) 5, 6, 7 10%(1963 ), 15%(1967 ), 30%(1971 ).(, 1996)

96 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 1970,.. 1980..,. 1980. 1987. (3) ; 1972.,. 1987...

. : 97... 1987......,. < - 8> 13 (1987 ) ( : %) 36.6 28.0 27.0 8.1 / 33.7 28.2 28.0 8.2 32.2 19.5 11.6 33.7 57.9 25.5 8.6 5.3 9.6 1.2 86.2 0.5 66.8 26.1 2.4 2.3 35.9 52.8 6.8 2.6 :,

98 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 1990 3, 1992. DJP 1997. 1992 1997,,,... < - 9> 14 (1992 ) ( : %) 42.0 33.8 16.3 7.9 / 36.0 34.8 19.8 9.4 36.2 27.3 23.8 12.7 40.8 15.2 33.5 10.5 4.2 90.9 2.3 2.6 61.6 8.7 17.0 12.7 72.1 10.8 8.8 8.3 :,,, :,. < - 10> 15 (1997 ) ( : %) 40.3 38.7 19.2 1.8 / 42.0 38.3 18.1 1.0 43.9 27.4 26.6 2.1 23.8 43.2 30.9 2.1 94.4 3.3 1.5 0.7 13.1 66.9 17.7 2.2 13.7 53.8 30.0 2.0 :,,, :,

. : 99 (4) ; 1997, IMF 15. ( ). 31).,.. < - 4> :. 4 6.4. 6,., 31) (http://www.cwd.go.kr).

100 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). 2000 4 13,. 2000 7..,... < - 5>

. : 101 3) (1) ; 32),, (, 1999). 1960..., 2.. 1930,.,.,. 33) 1950 ( ). 32) (1999). 33). 49.1%, 62.9%, 62.9%, 61.2%, 62.2% 39.7%, 18.7%.

102 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 6> 1960 (%) :, 1970, 34). 35)... < - 11> ( :, %) 3 4 5 6 15(13.4) 6(7.3) 15(10.3) 18(13.2) 11(12.5) 16(19.2) 14(12.5) 15(18.3) 29(20.0) 31(22.8) 11(12.5) 12(14.4) 20(17.9) 14(17.1) 20(14.7) 8(9.4) 16(17.1) 8(9.6) 4(3.6) 4(3.9) 8(5.5) 8(5.9) 5(5.7) 11(13.2) 8(7.1) 6(7.3) 15(10.3) 5(3.7) 6(6.8) 13(15.6) : (1999) 34) 1930. 1922, 1931 23,4% 23.2% (, 1994). 35)...(, 1999)

. : 103.,... 1980.,, (, 1999).. 1987,.. 3... 1987... 1971,. 1987..

104 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). < - 7> :. 7 13 14 15 :,. 1987 90%. 1988. 1988,,, 4,. 1992. 1987 52.8%

. : 105 72.1%.. 1996 15. 20 19,. 15 94.4%.,.,.,. (, 1999)... (2) ; 1987,.,,.

106 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)... 1980 1990 3.,.,.,.. < - 8> 1987

. : 107..,.,.,.... 21 16. 1 ( ),.,..

108 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,.,. < - 9> 3......,..

. : 109 1).,. 36).,.... < - 12> ( : %) 28.4 0.0 12.5 5.9 12.3 8.3 13.0 5.0 13.5 13.6 5.0 2.9 1.8 5.6 4.3 0.0 8.1 0.0 1.3 5.9 1.8 5.6 4.3 0.0 1.4 4.5 1.3 5.9 1.8 13.9 10.0 4.0 12.2 9.0 15.0 14.3 5.5 8.3 4.3 22.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 2.9 5.5 0.0 6.5 11.1 4.1 4.5 6.3 2.9 7.3 0.0 2.2 33.3 9.5 27.3 15.0 28.6 30.9 22.2 26.1 11.1 9.5 18.2 16.3 17.1 9.1 19.4 21.7 11.1 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 22.7 25.0 1.1 20.4 13.9 4.3 0.0 :. : (1999) 36) - ( ),, (, ), -, ( ),,, -,,,.

110 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)..,.,,.., (, 1999).,., 37). (revolving door system)..?. 37) 2 30.5.(Charles O. Jones(1994), (1999) )

. : 111....,., (pool).,.. 1990. 38)..,,.... 38) 3 1, 6 1.(, 1999 )

112 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).. 20 39).,... < - 13> 20 ( ) ( :,%) 20 20 20 2(10%) 17.1% 2(10%) 14.1% 1(5%) 6.2% 1(5%) 2(10%) 0(0%) 11.4% 9.8% 0(0%) 1(5%) 0(0%) 16.9% 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 12.9% 14.1% 2(10%) 2(10%) 4(20%) 23.1% 1(5%) 1(5%) 3(15%) 15.7% 19.6% 1(5%) 0(0%) 10(50%) 24.6% 8(40%) 18.7% 4(20%) 12.7% 1(5%) 16.9% 3(15%) 15.7% 8(40%) 24.0% 1(5%) 7.7% 0(0%) 1.4% 0(0%) 0% 0(0%) 1.5% 2(10%) 7.1% 0(0%) 5.6% 0(0%) 3.1% 20(100%) 100% 20(100%) 100% 20(100%) 100% : (1999) 39) 20,,,,,,,,,,,, 1 2.

. : 113 2),... (GRDP). < - 10> 1 (PGRD) (1995 ) : 3 1997. 1.

114 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 1 1987 1986 1997 2, 1998 1. 1997 IMF 1 6, 2, 4... 1990... 1970 1 (1972 1981 ) 1960.. 2 (1982 1991). 1982 ( ). 1980. 1980

. : 115,. 1987, 1988, 1989. 1989., 1987 1. 1990 7. < - 11> : (1997),, 1980..,.

116 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)., 43.2% 25.7%. 18.4% 40.7%.,. 4. 1) (1)... IMF....

. : 117 (2).,,.......,..,.. 2) (1).

118 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).. 20 30. 40),...........,.. 40), 1999

. : 119 (2). (, 1990), - (, 1997), (, 1998,, 1998,, 1998).... < - 14> - - 2

120 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). -,.,,,..... 41),... 41) (1999).

. : 121. 1. IMF... 98 2 23% 1 4 2. 42%, 20%.. ( ), ( ), 3.., ( ).., 2000 1 1. 83 100....

122 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). 4, 10 1 14.. '97 647 (48.6%), 158 (89.1%). 1. IMF,,.. 4... 1999 8, 2000 7 1,, 3. 98 100 2 3 1981 19.......

. : 123,. < - 12>

124 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 2. 1).. (1).... 88.,.,.. (2),.

. : 125.,,.,. ( ),.. (ICA) 1995.... ICA... 2),,., IMF.

126 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)... 3) (1). 90 UR... (2) 100. '98 4,. '98. 7. 23 7,, ( ) (

. : 127 ), 1. 3 3, 50 ('98. 7. 31). 3 1988 7 28 4. 3 4. 4 7,. 4,,. 1999 2 4. 21. (3). 99 3 8 4., 27. 110, 5, 76, 2,000 (99.4.19 5.8) (99. 6. 8)..

128 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,.. 99 9 7. < - 15> 94. 2 98. 4.13 98. 7.28 99. 2.23 99. 3. 8 99. 4 19 99. 6. 8 99. 6.14 99. 8.13 99. 9. 7 2000. 6. 1 2000. 7. 1 - -, - - - 98. 7.31 3-50 - 4-4 - ( 6018 ).,

. : 129 (4) 6 1. 2000 7 1.,...,,,,. 3,,,,,. < - 13>

130 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 3. 1) ( ).....,. 4..,.......,.

. : 131. < - 14> ( ) 3,, 2). 3C. (common sense)..

132 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). (conference). 99 3 110 5, 76, 2,000.,.,,.. (compromise). 3C..,.,..,...,...

. : 133 4. 2000 7 1. 5 1.,,......, - NGO -...,..

134 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). 1....,,....., IMF.. IMF,,. (too big to fail),,.

. : 135. IMF. IMF........... 2. :..,,

136 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,.,.,. < - 15> IMF...,,,,,.

. : 137........... IMF.,.....,...,,,,,,.

138 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)....,,,,,,.. 3. 1) : IMF IMF... IMF.,,,,. M&A.

. : 139 < - 16> IMF 2).. 98 5+3. 98 2, 5, 99 8, 5 3. 2000 2, 2.

140 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 16> 2000.. 2000 9, 665 ( 44, 236, 385 ).. 99 1/4 918.. 3,.,. M&A,,, M&A.

. : 141. M&A,.,., (rules of game).. M&A M&A.........

142 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 17> (1998.2~2000.9)

. : 143...... 3) :... IMF....,.

144 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 18> 4 : 3 7 2000 :,. 2...,.

. : 145 4. 1). 1.....,,..,,...,,. 80 M&A.

146 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).. 2) : -... -... -..

. : 147 3)... 1997.,,,.,,,.. 4). 99. -.

148 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,,.... 200% 1. 1. 200%..,,, 13 50%.. 5. 1)...

. : 149.,,.,...,,. -.,.,.. 2),..,...

150 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)......... 3)...,.,,........

. : 151. 1. 6 74. 3 4,, 10%, 2002 5 31. 58,.,.,.. 4 50 1 20.. 1 1,..

152 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 2. 10, 4 1. 42). 21 29 1 1 22.,. 34 3,.... 25, 5. (1 4 86 ). 4 53, 5 11., 42) 2000 27.2% 7 13.6% 2500.

. : 153. 1... 90% 6%.,... 7 10,. 43), (CCTV). 3... 6 3 21 74. 43) 6 2 3 13%.

154 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 6.9 6.10 6.29,, 3, 1 88. 1 3, 7.1 7.10 3 7.21 8.10, 58 2 70, 17 (IUF), (PSI) 4, 8.21,, 10% 3 4 10% 2002 5 31 14% ( ) 15, 7

. : 155 3.,,..,. (part-time employment)......., 5 2 4. ' '

156 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).. < - 19> 2 5 98 55 57 55 56 ( 1 ) 17% 8%., 21 58 3.. 1 3..

. : 157, (IUF), (PSI) 4... 10, (ASEM). 2.,.,. 44). 14%, 1979 1988. 10%. 1992. '70%+ ', 2 50%.. 44)...

158 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)... 6 10 8. 15 7. 10%,,, 60.., 270 16 17 6. 45),. 46),..,,. 1 45), 17, 20 4. 2 200 64. 46).,.

. : 159..,.,.... 96,.., 123, 302 12 20.,....

160 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),. 20.,...,. 4.,, 3,.. 47), 3. 47) 2 6 29 36 37., 36. 1.. 37 36 37.

. : 161. 48) 6 9,,,. 400 20%.. 5 2. (10%) 20. 10% 90 IMF.... 6 10, (union shop). 95% 65%,. 300.,, 48) 70, 270. 3..

162 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)..,...,.,,....,..,...

. : 163.,.,,.,,,,,...,,,,,,,,..,...., (system fatigue).

164 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). 1. 90 9. 700 1 5,568. 91 3 (92 2001 ). 91 97 97 9.....,...,.,...,.

. : 165.....,.,. 2. 1) < -20>,,, 4. (1) (90.9 97.9) 90 9 97 9.,.,

166 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 49) 97 9., 97 9.. (2) (97.9 99.2) 97 9 99 2.... (3) (99.2 99.8)....,.. 49) 97. 97,,.

. : 167 < - 20> 90.9 91. 91-97 97.9 97.10-9 99.2 99.2-00 00.3 00.6-700, 1 5,568-3 (92 2001), - - -, (6.5 ) 98.8 3, 98.10, 98.11 3, 10 - - - - - (,,,, ) 99.3 PC - (81.8% ) - (91% ) 99.4, ( ) 99.8,,

168 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) (4) (99.8 2000.6) 1999 8.... 2). (< - 14> ). < - 17>

. : 169 (1)... (2)... 3..,, ( 10 ),., (< -21> ).

170 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 21> 12.......... 3 2.. :...,,. 1) ( ) (1).

. : 171. 50). 117,,.. 70. (2). 2006 5, 2011 11.,. 4. (3). 50). 26% 12,929, 10,899.,,,,,,.

172 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea). (4) 98m 7.,. 2) ( ),,.... 97....

. : 173 < - 22> : vs. (, ) (, ), 4. < -23>,.... < -23> ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ),,

174 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,. 97,..,.,,,...,,.,. ( )..

. : 175. 1. 30.,,,. ( )..,... 18 25, 2002 47, 2006 85. 18,, ( 2000).?.. ( 2000).

176 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)......,.,.,.,. 2. 1) (1) 1999 12.

. : 177.. 5 99 21 2000 41. < - 24> ( : ) '96 '97 '98 '99 2000.8 51 198 305 387 448 9 46 105 138 149 1 5 10 21 41 : (2) 2000 5. 1999. 99 7 6.. (3) 2000 6.,,,

178 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)... 7 200.. (4) 8 12.,,,,,,,. 8 21 30, 1,519. 200 ( ) 11. 9, 9 25.. 10 13. 97 99 12,,,,. 10 15.

. : 179 4. 10 19, 26. (5) 10 31 4. 200m 4 1 17. 10,,, 16,. 11 9. 4 1.

180 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 25> 1999. 2 9 12 2000. 4 5 5.15 6 6.12 6.14 6.28 7.13 7.19 8.12 8.21 8.23 8.28 8.30 9.10 9.25 9.30 10.15 10.19 10.23 10.26 10.31 11.9, 6, 1 ( ) 2, 1 (, ), ( ), 1, 4 2, 10, ( ) 4

. : 181 2). 7... 3. < - 18> 7 YMCA,,,,,,,...,...

182 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)........ < - 19> vs

. : 183...,,,. ( 2 m) (50m )..... 3. 1)

184 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)...,.... 2),.. 98 8 ( 200m ),, 485 6 (1.2%). 24 23...,...

. : 185,. 1999 10. 2000 10... 3).. 99 2.. 99 2.. 99 12. 1.

186 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)...,,.,,.. 4. 1).....

. : 187 2)..... 30, 40 1970-1980,.. 3)..,,..,.,,.

. : 177

. 191 4 1. 1),.,....,.,. 51)... 51), 3,.,.

192 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),.,.,,.....,...,. 2)..

. 193..,..?.,,.....,.,...,. < - 1>.

194 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < - 1> A : B : C : : Davies' the J-curve of social revolution (1969) ( A ). (status inconsistency).,. (rising levels of expectations or aspirations) ( B ). (demonstration effects). (conspicuous consumption),

. 195. ( C ).,,,., 1. 52)........,..,.,.,.,, 52).,.

196 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,...,....,.,.,.,,.,....,,,,,..,,,,,.,,.,,..

. 197 3),.,.,,.,,, 3,,,,,,.,.,.,,.,...,..,

198 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,,.,.,..,,..,.. (technical response).....,.....

. 199.,.,. < - 2>...,..

200 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),,,,,,,...,..,.. (filter-down effects)...,,.....

. 201.,,...... 2. 1),?...,...,..

202 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea)..,.,...,.,..,,.,. 53).... 80 (corporatism),. 53) 2.,,..,.

. 203. (self-reliance)... 54)..,. 55)...,...,... 54),. IMF. 55) 1987,.

204 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),.. 56)..,. (conflict situations).,......,,,.. 56),.,,.

. 205,,, (relative power position).. 2),,.,...,,, 3,,....,.,,.,,,

206 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea),,,,... < - 3> < -3>. 3.,. 2 1. 1.

. 207..,,,...,.... 3) 20 3. 1970,,, 1980,,,,,, 1980,,,. (crisis of success), (crisis of failure).,.

208 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 3....,..,,. (homeless mind).,,,.,,,,,,.. ( )....,

. 209,. 3. (NGOs) (NPOs)... (public goods).,... 57),..,,..... 57),,...,.

210 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea).,....,.,,..

213 ( ) ( ) : : :,, : : :, vs. : : vs. ( / ) : 100 3 (, : 3, ) vs., : ( ),,

214 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) ( ) ( ), vs. (, ) : : 5, ( ) vs. ( ), 8% 10% : 3 4 : :, 17%, :, : ( ) : (,, ( vs. ) ) : : vs. (, : : ( ) : : ( vs. ) :,

215 1. 1) :, 2) : 3) : - : - : - : 4) : 5) : -, -, 6) : - -

216 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 2. 1) : 2) :, 3) : - :, - : - : 4) : 5) : - -, 6) : - -

217 3. 1) : ( ) 2) : 3) : - : ( ) - : ( ) 4) : - 5) : - 6) : - ( ) - ( ) - ( )

218 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 4. 1) : - -,,,,, 2) : - (,, ) 3) : - : - : - 3 : 4) : ( ) 5) :, 6) : - - - -

219 5. 1) :, 2) : ( ) 3) : - : - : 4) : - - 5) : - - 6) : - - ( )

220 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) 6. 1) : -,, - 2) : - - 3) : - : (,,, ) -, : (, ) - : ( ) - : (, ) 4) : 5) : 6) :

221 7. 1) : - - ( ) 2) : - -, 3) : - :, - :, - :, 4) : - - (, ) - 5) : - - - - 6) : -

222 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) < > (1993), - -, 27 3,. (1997),, (2000),,?,. (1995),,, 29 3,. (1997), ", -,. (1994), :, 28,. (1999), " :, -,. (1999), :, -,. (1999), :, -,. (1996),., 18, (1998) :, 32 1,. 4 (2000),. (1999.8),.,, (1999.3),. (1997),,. (1989),,. (2000.4), 3.

223 (1998.12),,. (1996) -, 18,. (2000),,. (1998), :, 1 1,. (1985),,. (1998),, 2 1,. (1999), -,. (1991),,. (1999), :, 1999 -,. (1999),, 11. (1994),,,. (1997), :, 31 2,. (1994),,,. (2000),,. (2000),,. (1999), :, 1999 : 50,. (1999), :, 33 2,. (1999),,,. (1999), 99.

224 (The Storming Upon Us: Social Conflicts in South Korea) (1998.11),. (1996),,. (1997),,. (1999),, -,. (1999), :, -,. (2000), :,,. (1999), ( ). < > Bates, R. and A. Krueger(1993), Political and Economic Interactions in Economic Policy Reform, Oxford, Blackwell. Benhabib, J. and A. Rustinchini, "Social Conflict and Growth," Journal of Economic Growth 1: 125-142. Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis(1998), Recasting Egalitarianism: New Rules for Communities, States and Markets, New York, Verso. Cohen, A.(1974), Two-Dimensional Man: An Essay on the Anthropology of Power and Symbolism in Complex Society, Berkeley, University of California Press. Davies, James(1969), "The J- Curve of Rising and Decling Satisfaction as a Cause of some Great Revolutions and a Contained Rebellion," in H. D. Graham and T. Gurr (eds.), Violence in America, New York, Bantam. Giddens, A.(1975), The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies, New York, Harper & Row. Gurr, Ted(1974), "Persistence and Change in Political Systems," American Political Science Review 68: 1482-1504. Haggard, S. and R. Kaufman(1995), The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions, Princeton, Princeton University Press. Huntington, S.(1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, Oklahoma University Press.

225 Jones, Charles(1994), The Presidency in a Separated System, Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution. Krueger, A.(1993), Political Economy of Policy Reform in Developing Countries, Cambridge, MIT Press. Mueller, Dennis(1997), Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Nye, Johseph(1997), Why People Don't Trust Government?, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Olson, Mancur(1971), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Parsons(1939), The Professions and Social Structure, Social Forces 17: 457-67. Roemer, John(1998), Theories of Distributive Justice, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Shapiro, Thomas(2000), Great Divides, Mountain View, Mayfield Publishing. Skocpol, T.(1979), States and Social Revolutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Stavenhagen, R. (ed.)(1996), Ethnic Conflict and the Nation State, New York, St. Martin Press. Stewart, F., F. Humphrey and Nick Lee(1997), "Civil Conflict in Developing Countries over the Last Quarter of a Century: An Empirical Overview of Economic and Social Consequences, Oxford Development Studies 25 (1) Susskind, Lawrence et al.(1999), The Consensus Building Handbook, London, Sage. Wright, Erik(1999), Classes, New York, Verso.