- Stu dy of Ch ar act eristic of M odernism in Jeong Ji- Yong ' s P oetry -
- T he Characteristic Study of Modernism About Jeong Ji- Yong ' s a Poem - 2 0 0 0
. 20 0 0 6
.... 1 1.... 2 2.... 7 3.... 9.... 12 1.... 12 2.... 14 3.... 18 4.... 19.... 23 1.... 24 1)... 25.... 26 (1)... 27 (2)...21 2)... 37 (1)... 38 (2)... 41 2.... 45 1)... 46.... 47 - i -
..... 55 ( )... 59 2)... 63.... 78.... 80... 82 ABST RA CT... 86 - ii -
.. 1930.. 1988719. 1),... 1926(19269)3, 9, 5. 2). 3, 3) 1),,,, 5. 2) 3 < >, < >, < >, 5 < >, < >, < >, < >, < ( ) >. 3) < > < >, < >, < >., (, 1981), pp. 188~193. - 1 -
,... 1..,.,.,,,,.,. 4), 4), < >,,(1935. 12) - 2 -
.., 5).,,.,,,,,. 6) 1950.,. 7). 1960. 8), 5),, (, 1949), p. 242. 6),, (, 1947), p. 83. 7),, ( :, 1958) 8) 60.., < >, (, 1961)., < >, (, 1962. 5. :, 1962)., < >, (, 1962. 12)., <, >, (, 1962. 12)., < 60>, (, 1968. 6).,<,. >, (, 1968. 7), pp. 321 ~ 326. - 3 -
. 60,. 9).,,,. 10)..,.. 70. 11) 60 9),, (, 1962), pp. 11 ~ 12. 10), <, >, (, 1962. 12) 11) 70.,, ( 1962. 11) (, :, 1974), pp. 192 ~ 262.,, (,,, 1970), ( : 1976), pp. 85 ~ 139.,..,, (. :.7, 13, 1973 ), pp. 681 ~ 686. - 4 -
..,. 60,. 80,.. 12), 30, ( 9, 1975 ) (, :, 1978), pp. 27 ~ 34,, ( 1979) (, :, 1981), pp. 86 ~ 102,, (1979 ) (,, :, 1982), pp. 158 ~ 174.,, (, 1980), pp. 200 ~ 259.,, (, 1982), pp. 180 ~ 206. 12) 80,., < >, (, 1980), < >, (, 1980), < >, (, 1981), < - >, (, :, 1981), < >, (, 1981), < >, (, 1982) < >, (4, 1985), < >, (, 1982, 7), < - >, ( :, 1984), < - >, (, 1983) - 5 -
,. 1980 13). 100.,. 1987.,., < >, ( 1982), < >, (, :, 1985) 13),, (, 1981) * 90., < >, (, 1990 ), < >, (, 1992 ), < >, (, 1992 ), < -, 1992 ) >, (, < >, (,, 1992 ), < >, (, 1994. ), < 1- ( ), (, 1996 ) - 6 -
2..,.. 14).,.. incarnation.,.,.,. 15) in carn ation.,. 14) Ren e W ellek & A u stin W arren :T heory of L iter ature, (London, 1955), p. 139. 15),, (, 1949), pp. 108 ~ 109. - 7 -
........,...,., 1920,.,.,,. - 8 -
3. 1902 515. 16), 17).. 2 < >, < >., (1913 ). 31, 6. 25 (1928. 2.1) (1934. 11.17 ). 1914325 ( ) 44, 191842, 19141917. 192234, 1. 16),, (, 1987), p. 110.. 1903 1904,. 1904515,. 1902 515. 35(1902) 515. 17),, (, 1982. 7), p. 384. 4. - 9 -
, 1927 7< > 1922 3. < >. 3287 6.,...- -.. - -,,,,,,,. - - < > < >, < >, < >, < >, < > - - 18)., < >, < >, < >, < >. 18), (, 1936. 7 ), pp. 43 ~ 44. - 10 -
.,., 19).,,. 20). 1941 110.. 8. < >, < >, < >. (1941. 9 ).. 193921941 4, 1945,,, < > (1939. 5 ), < > (1939. 10), < > (1939. 11), < >, (1939. 11). 19),, ( :, 1984), p. 47 192353,, 19296 30. 20),, pp. 386 ~ 387. - 11 -
2.. 1946 5, (1946. 10., ), 3 (1950. 3 ).. 21). 1.. 19, 19, 20. (19),.,,. 22)..., 21) 1950. 5 () (pp. 112 ~ 120). 22) F - Jam eson, P os t m od ern ism or the Cultural L og ic of L ate Cap italism, (Duke Univ. Press. 1991), pp. 35 ~ 95. - 12 -
,... 1 : 1,,,.....,. 1863,,...,...,. 23),,.. 24) 23),, (, 1983) - 13 -
16,17 19.. 16,7,., ().,... 19. 20,. 2.... 30..,,,,., 24) S.Lash, S ociety of P os tm od ern ism, (London, 1990) - 14 -
.,. 19 1, 2, 25).. 19,,. 19,,.,. 26),.,,,.,. 27).,,,,,. 28) 25),, (, 1993). pp. 22 ~ 23. 26),, (, 1993.). 27),, 106. 28), (, 3) - 15 -
,,,, 29),..,,,,,,. 30),,. 31),.,,,,,. 32),..,,.,.,,,. 33) 29), T he M od ern W riter and H is W orld, K enky usha, 1956),,(, 1981). p. 43. 30),, (,, 1986), pp. 46 ~ 50. 31) Ihab Has san, P os t M od ernism, (,, 1985), pp. 46 ~ 50. 32),, pp.55 ~ 104. 33) - 16 -
,,..,,,,,.. 34),. 35). 36),.,,.. 34)..., 30,,.,,.,.,,,. 35),, p.79 36),. - 17 -
.,. 37) 3.,,,., 20.. 2. 30,. 20,. 38) 20-30,,, 39)..,, (, 1994) 37), < >, (, 1988), p.79. 38), 20, (, 1989), p. 126.,. 39),, 127. - 18 -
,, (v ort icism ),.. 30 20. 30., 1926< >, < > 30,...,.. 40) 4. 30., 190020 (1933 31, 24), ( ),, 40), - 30,.,1930, (, 1987) - 19 -
1930.,.... 41). (1,, 2,, ) (3 ).,,. - - 1,, 30. 41) W alt er Benjamin (. ),, (, 1990), pp. 197 ~ 231.,,,,..,.,.,.,.,...,,..,... - 20 -
.,... 9.,,,,,,,, 42) 13(1929 ). 43) (), (), ( ),( ), (), ( ), (), ( ), (),,,..,.. 44).,, 19346, 42) (1933. 8.30). 43), - 30, (, 1985) 44) (1933. 10. 1), 1934(1934. 1. 4). - 21 -
.,,,,.,,..,,.. 1926< >, < >, < >,,. < > 1920,,............ 45) 45),, (,, 1949), pp.196~197. - 22 -
,. 1,,.,..,.,,,. 46)....,.,. 47),.,.,. 48). 46). 47),,, (,, 1983), pp. 247 ~ 248. 48),, p. 248. - 23 -
,..,,...,,,. 1., (U rb an ism ) 49) (A b str action ) 50). 49).,,, (A pollo),,, (Diony su s )...,. M. K. Sp erars, op,cit., pp 35 ~40, I hab H assan ( ), op. cit., pp. 42 ~ 46. 50). (W ilhelm W orring er ) (Naturalistic Style) (N on - naturalistic Style). - 24 -
1 ),,, 1, 21 2... 1920 ~ 30....,.,,..... - 25 -
.,,...,......,.,,.,,,,. - 26 -
.,.,... (1 ).,, 51)....,. 52) 51), < >,, 1939. 3. 2 ~ 3. 11. 52) <>. - 27 -
.,.,.,..,... - - < > 1. -. - - < > 2 < >. < >. 1 2. 1 7,.. - 28 -
,, -.,, -., -., -. - 29 -
,,, -. < > -..,,,,..,. 1, 3, 4. (1) (3), (4). (1) (5)... < >,. - 30 -
., -..,. -. 53)., -.., < >..,.. < >..,... < > -. < >.. < >. 53), < >,, (, 1989). - 31 -
(2 ) < >.....,......!......,!... - 32 -
< >,., ().. 54) ( ),. ( ),.,.... 54)....,. - 33 -
!. < >.,.,.,,,,..,.., 55),.,.,. 1926< > < >, < 55)... - 34 -
>,,.,,,. ( )!!!(? ) < > - -..... - 35 -
,!... < > ( ) 1920,,.. 1930, -.,. 56) 56) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 < 1> - 36 -
.., 1930. 2 ) (A. C. Zij derv eld ),. 57),.,..., 58).,. (H erb ert R ead ),. (Dehu m anizat ion ) 57) A. C. Ziderv eld (), T he A bs tract S ociety, (, 1983), p. 87. 58) Rudolf Arnhuim (),T oward a p hy chology of A rt(), (, 1988), pp. 43 ~ 45. - 37 -
(T y pogr aphical A cr ob atic ). (1 ),..,,,. 59),,.,.. (phy sical p oetry )...,,.,..,. 59) Jose Ortega Y Gasset (),L a d eshum an iz ation d el arte, (, 1979), pp. 51 ~ 66. - 38 -
,. < 5, 6>,.,,.. ( descriptiv e im ag e ),.,.,,. (J ohn Crow e R an som, 1888 ~ 1974). 60).,... -... < 9> 60) John Crow e Ran som, 'P oetry : A N ote on On tology ', ed., W illiam J.han dy. et al, T w entieth Century Criticism (New Delhi : Light & Life Publisher s, 1974), p.45. - 39 -
.. ( ), ( ).,.,,..,,.,...,,,,,! < >,.,,. 3-40 -
., 61). (2 ) (N on - n atu r alist ic ), (Geom etric ),...,,,,. ( ). 62) 61),, (, 1971), p. 77. 62) < >.,. - 41 -
. 1926 < >, < >, < >. - -..... < > ( 2, 3),. - 42 -
.., (, )............. - ~!......... < >., - 43 -
. 63) < > < >.,,,, 3 3.. < 3>.,.,. 1930 1926< >, < >, < >,,, 63). < 3> - 44 -
. 2.,,..,,.,. ( ).,.,..,..,,..,. - 45 -
1930 1930.,,,..,.. 1 ).,,., 64).,,,,.,,. 65) 64),,(, 1981), pp.17~18. 65) Erich, F rom n, op. cit., pp. 125~148. - 46 -
,,,., 66),, 67).,, ().. 15..,... < >, < >, < >, < >, < >...... 66) M. K. Spear s, op. cit., pp. 24~28. 67), < >, :, 1982.. - 47 -
,.,.,,,......,,,,.,. -. -.,..,..... - 48 -
.,. < 2>...,.,.. < >.. - 49 -
..,,.,....,.,.,...,..,... < >.,.. - 50 -
. < >.!,.. < >......., /./.,..., - 51 -
....,..,,......,.,....,,.... ( )!! /! (? ) -.... - 52 -
,..!.,..,...!..,,../! -..... < >............., - 53 -
..,.......... < ( ), (1)>.,.. () /. < >,......... < >. - 54 -
.......,,.,...... < > < >,.,,. 1930...., - 55 -
. 68),,,,..., 69),. 70).,..... 68), < >, (,, 1980), pp. 24~30. 69),, pp. 76~78. 70), < >, (,, 1980), p. 42. - 56 -
.!..!( )...... < ( 5)>..? 3.,.. -,. - 57 -
,.... ()..,....,.....,. < >...! - 58 -
!. < > 5~7 < >....................... ( ) - 59 -
3,. 3. 1935.,.,.,. < >.,?,. < >, - 60 -
.......,.. /? -,...., -....?,?........ - 61 -
..,. < >...,,........ < > - 62 -
..,,,,. < >.... < >..,.. (2 ) - 63 -
...,,,. 71) 52.,.!.-..! 71),, ( :, 1948),pp. 108 ~ 129. - 64 -
!. < > ( 1933. 6) -...!... - 65 -
...... < >.,...,.,. 2.,....,..,,..,.,...,... - 66 -
., < >.,..,..,! ~!......,..,. 72) 73).. 72),, pp.65 ~ 66. 73),, ( :, 1963) p. 196. - 67 -
,..,.,.,.,..,.. /.,.,. /.,....,..,..... /. - 68 -
..,,........., < > < >..,...,.,..., - 69 -
.,,...,, -,. <.2>, ( 1931. 1)!........!! - 70 -
! (! )! < >, ( 5 1933. 10) ( : ) 1,...,.,.,...,...,.,...,, ().. ().,.... - 71 -
....,...,.. 1,,..,.........,,., - 72 -
......,...,.,..,..! (!)...!..., - 73 -
.,..,.,.. < >,, < >. 74), 74),, ( :, 1978), pp. 328 ~ 336. - 74 -
,.,..,.,,.,.,...,,., -.,, pp. 87 ~ 88.,, 31, 1980), pp. 24 ~ 26. (,, - 75 -
.,. < > < >.,,.,,........ < > < >. < >, < >. < >. - 76 -
.!.. < >.,...,....,?! - 77 -
. < >..,..,.......,..,.. - 78 -
.,.. 20 ~ 30.. < > 20..........,,,.,.,..,. - 79 -
.,. 30...,,. 1920, 1926. 1933. 1930,,,..,..,,,. - 80 -
.,...,.,.,,. - 81 -
1. 1 ( ),,, 1935.,,, 1941.,,, 1948.,,, 1949. 2. 2 ( ), -,, 1981.,,,,, 1983,,, 1962. 11.,,.,, 1968. 7., -,, 1984., 30, 9, 1975..,,,, 1985., 60,. 1968. 6. - 82 -
, - 30., -,, 105, 1963. 9.,, 13, 1973..,,, 1981.,,, 1981.,,, 1936. 7.,,, 1979.,,, 1981.,,, 1980.,, ( ),, 1962. 12.,,, 1993,.,, 31, 1980.,,, 1970.,,, 1983.,,,, 1987.,,, 1962. 5.,,, 1962, 12., - 30,, 1985.,,, 1982.,,, 4, 1985.,, 1982.,,,, 1961.,,, 1982. 7. - 83 -
3.,,, 1947.,,, 1974.,,, 1978.,,, 1984.,,,1993.,,, 1981.,,, 1987.,,, 1958.,,, 1971.,, 1930,, 1987.,,, 1981.,,, 1980.,,, 1963.,,, 1982., 20,, 1989.,,, 1940.,,, 1949.,,, 1983.,,, 1982. - 84 -
4.,,, 1990,,, 1994. J am eson - F, P ost m odern ism or th e Cu ltu ral L og ic of K at e Capit alism, 1991. J oh n Crow e Ran s om, P oetry : A N ot e on On t olog y, ed, W illiam J.h an dy.et al,,,, 1983. La sh. S, S ociet y of P ostm odernism, 1990., T h e M odern W rit er an d H is W orld, K en ky u sh a, 1956. R en e W ellek & A u stin W arren, T h eory of Lit er at ur e, 1955. T w en tieth Cen tu r e Criticism, N ew D elhi : Lig ht & Life P u blish er s, 1974.,,,, 1986.,,, Ih ab H a s s an, post M odern ism,,, 1985. Ih ab H a s s an, M.K.S perar s, op,cit,. Ru doif A rn h uim, T ow ard a ph y ch ology of A rt (),., 1988. J os e Ort eg a Y Ga s set, La desh um an ization del art e,,, 1979. W alt er B enj am in,,. - 85 -
A B S T RA CT S tu dy of Ch ara ct eri s t ic s of M o de rni s m in Je on g Ji - Y on g 's P o etry K im E un - S ook T h e Gradu at e S c h o ol of E du c at i on K in - K u k U n iv ers it y T he w orld view and thought s of a poet w hose poem s imply modernism can be br ought out by scrutinizing social and economical backgrounds along with cultur al hist ory surrounding his w ork activities. Modernity of modernism is not ju st a reproduction or r eflection of r eality, but a cr eativ e configuration of m odernity, namely, a new recognition and criticism of the pr esent in contrast to the contempor ary social and cultur al condition s. T he starting point of m odernism in our history of liter atur e goes back to mid 1920' s w hen lot s of modernism tr ends including dadaism w ere introduced to the nation, and further, in 1926, Jeong debuted his fir st modernism poem. Modernism in it s r eal name, how ev er, w as ignited by the or ganization of ' KuInHoi - a group of nine poets ' in 1933. T he poetry of modernity in 1930' s w as based on ' fr eak ' capitalism, m ainly in Seoul which w as built by Japanese colonialism, and configur ated by the member s of city generation of poet s including Kim Ki Rim, Jeong Ji Yong, Lee Sang and Kim Kw ang Kyun who repr esented the urban sen sitivity and new liter ary spirit in modernity. T his - 86 -
paper fir st defines the esthetic form and self- consciou snes s of modernity which consist of esthetic categories of modernism as the char acteristics of modernism, and go on to dig out the elem ent s of r ecognition of m odernity by focu sing on Jeong ' s poetry. Urbanism and City images, the characteristics of modern art, for esthetic typed modernity, and the sen ses of estrangem ent and anxiety for esthetic self- con sciousness are the basic element s of recognition. T he esthetic self- con sciousness of modernism is represented in the form of estrangem ent in Jeong ' s poem s. T he sen se of estr angement in his poem s is as sociated with cultur al criticism, eschatology, escape from r ational and reasonal w orld, and explor ation of new cultur al trend, etc. How ev er, the ideology of our modernism is differ ent fr om those of Western counterpart s. T hat is becau se the social background and civilization history of the W est, the root of W estern modernism, is different from our s. Sen sitiv e of contemporary social changes, Jeong seemed not to lead his liter atur e r egar dless of the literal theme of anxiety. His early w ork s such as children ' s rhymes and folk song style poem s show the con sciou sness of anxiety. Con sidering they are the early w orks of clear r epresentation of his con sciou sness, w e can under stand them as the basic thought of his liter ary world. A s seen abov e, the modernism liter ature of Kor ea has it s own limit s of Western - oriented styles though it is based on our ow n social backgrounds and a mer e superficial admission as part of ideological imitation of Western cultur e. Relation s betw een the esthetic form s and self- con sciou sness of modernism and the contemporary sociocultur al backgrounds and cultural history ar e not ju st a simple and direct r espon se, but r elation ships betw een them and v ariou s super structur es of religiou s, philosophic and liter ary dev elopm ent s in an indir ect m anner. - 87 -