Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in University & 2 Kang Won University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusion] Key words: Ⅰ Ⅲ
Ⅲ Ⅲ
Ⅲ Table 1. Seasonal participants season competition method event N 25th (2009) overall 6 412 26th (2010) overall 5 371 qualifier 4 375 27th (2011) semi 2 230 2 120 qualifier 4 434 28th (2012) semi 2 224 2 128 qualifier 4 456 29th (2013) semi 2 281 2 163 qualifier 4 519 30th (2014) semi 2 293 2 164 qualifier 4 505 31st (2015) semi 2 292 2 174 qualifier 4 358 32nd (2016) semi 2 284 2 133 qualifier 4 431 33rd (2017) semi 2 279 2 142 total 6768
Fig. 1. example for scoring Table 2. events for season and competition method season 25th (2009) 26th (2010) 27th~ 28th (2011~ 2012) 29th~ 33rd (2013~ 2017) event standard parallel progressive parallel free progressive parallel middle progressive parallel combination progressive parallel Standard & Progressive parallel progressive parallel middle combination mogul combination progressive parallel qualifier progressive parallel middle Standard & Progressive parallel semi progressive parallel mogul progressive parallel combination combination progressive parallel qualifier progressive parallel middle Standard & Progressive parallel semi progressive parallel mogul Giant Slalom(gate) progressive parallel
Ⅲ Fig. 2. standard for scoring(ksia, 2017)
σ σ Table 3. analysis results 25th season combination (N=388) free (N=388) middle (N=388) carving (N=388) (N=388) (N=388) J1 89.70 1.42 J2 89.21 1.17 J3 89.18 1.58 J4 89.28 1.27 J5 89.46 1.59 J6 89.67 1.35 J7 89.69 1.30 J8 89.63 1.55 J9 89.63 1.35 J10 89.72 1.58 J11 89.93 1.33 J12 89.77 1.57 J13 89.76 1.72 J14 89.56 1.55 J15 89.54 1.48 J16 90.47 1.49 J17 89.84 1.58 J18 89.76 1.78 J19 89.35 1.49 J20 89.57 1.61 J21 89.66 1.60 J22 90.07 1.71 J23 89.66 1.58 J24 89.77 1.87 J25 90.31 1.58 J26 88.47 2.01 J27 88.26 1.77 J28 88.31 1.87 J29 88.78 1.96 J30 88.26 1.79.930.946.928.931.931.948 p 1.449 70.95 j.045 2.23 p*j.548 26.82 p 1.588 77.65 j.000 0.02 p*j.457 22.33 p 1.703 71.43 j.025 1.05 p*j.656 27.52 p 1.848 68.13 j.175 6.46 p*j.689 25.41 p 2.041 71.00 j.081 2.81 p*j.753 26.19 p 2.786 77.56 j.047 1.32 p*j.759 21.12
Table 4. analysis results 26th season J1 88.29 1.49 p 2.325 74.13 middle J2 88.50 1.92 J3 88.33 1.86.944 j.127 4.04 (N=333) J4 89.18 1.56 J5 88.55 1.80 p*j.685 21.83 J6 88.26 2.06 p 3.962 81.37 mogul (N=333) (N=333) combina tion (N=333) (N=333) J7 88.61 2.11 J8 87.88 2.34 J9 88.48 2.17 J10 88.62 2.23 J11 88.28 1.52 J12 88.35 1.67 J13 87.98 1.78 J14 88.63 1.64 J15 88.09 1.52 J16 89.41 1.57 J17 89.30 1.62 J18 89.70 1.56 J19 89.56 1.29 J20 89.27 1.65 J21 89.80 1.43 J22 90.01 1.45 J23 89.57 1.45 J24 89.08 1.47.961.936.954.939 J25 89.26 1.24 j.094 1.93 p*j.813 16.70 p 1.973 72.70 j.061 2.25 p*j.680 25.05 p 1.917 79.37 j.032 1.34 p*j.466 19.29 p 1.499 70.48 j.141 6.65 p*j.486 22.87 Table 5. analysis results 27th season J1 89.44 1.21 p 1.002 67.73 J2 89.98 1.04 J3 89.65 1.27.926 j.078 5.24 J4 89.48 1.24 J5 89.22 1.15 p*j.400 27.03 J6 88.21 1.35 p 1.279 66.88 J7 88.27 1.16 combi J8 88.90 1.31.919 j.071 3.73 nation J9 88.53 1.42 qualifier J10 88.43 1.52 p*j.562 29.40 (N=362) J11 89.02 1.46 p 1.618 70.50 J12 89.58 1.17 middle J13 89.13 1.53.930 j.070 3.06 J14 88.88 1.75 J15 89.02 1.50 p*j.607 26.43 J16 88.67 1.15 p 1.033 69.72 J17 88.54 1.10 J18 89.10 1.11.929 j.051 3.48 J19 88.90 1.30 J20 88.98 1.30 p*j.397 26.80 J21 90.30 1.30 p 1.566 79.78 J22 90.37 1.47 J23 90.17 1.40.953 j.007 0.35 J24 90.34 1.36 semi J25 90.40 1.46 p*j.390 19.87 (N=230) J26 90.19 1.81 p 3.061 86.71 J27 90.59 1.90 Mogul J28 90.85 1.85.974 j.068 1.94 J29 90.34 1.71 J30 90.67 2.02 p*j.401 11.35 J31 91.52 1.24 p 1.043 68.97 J32 91.73 1.13 combi J33 91.10 1.14.937 j.119 7.90 nation J34 90.87 1.17 J35 91.51 1.22 p*j.350 23.13 (N=120) J36 91.58 1.19 p 1.205 76.19 J37 91.33 1.22 J38 91.33 1.18.948 j.048 3.03 J39 90.97 1.32 J40 91.17 1.28 p*j.329 20.78
Table 6. analysis results 28th season J1 88.26 1.50 p 1.966 73.40 J2 88.49 1.72 J3 88.20 1.66.934 j.019 0.72 J4 88.45 1.57 J5 88.18 1.70 p*j.693 25.89 J6 89.82 1.53 p 1.755 76.97 combi J7 90.17 1.62 J8 90.28 1.47.948 j.041 1.80 nation J9 90.24 1.31 qualifier J10 90.35 1.52 p*j.484 21.23 (N=414) J11 88.25 1.59 p 1.973 75.13 middle J12 88.03 1.55 J13 88.13 1.60.939 j.015 0.55 J14 88.19 1.67 J15 87.93 1.67 p*j.639 24.32 J16 89.44 1.48 p 1.912 77.97 J17 89.56 1.58 J18 89.79 1.49.949 j.026 1.06 J19 89.81 1.71 J20 89.78 1.52 p*j.514 20.97 J21 90.61 1.34 p 1.063 63.73 J22 90.72 1.51 J23 90.67 1.16.899 j.005 0.29 semi J24 90.62 1.28 J25 90.82 1.12 p*j.600 35.98 J26 88.30 2.55 (N=216) p 6.515 88.94 J27 88.57 2.47 Mogul J28 88.84 2.82.977 j.039 0.53 J29 88.61 2.79 J30 88.43 2.84 p*j.772 10.53 J31 91.45 1.34 p 1.39 73.39 combi J32 91.54 1.31 J33 91.18 1.53.936 j.03 1.67 nation J34 91.48 1.35 J35 91.70 1.28 p*j.47 24.95 (N=121) J36 91.20 1.53 p 1.12 57.59 J37 91.29 1.31 J38 91.25 1.42.875 j.02 1.20 J39 90.89 1.09 J40 91.32 1.52 p*j.80 41.21 Table 7. analysis results 29th season J1 89.42 1.72 p 1.800 72.62 J2 89.48 1.49 J3 89.60 1.54.931 j.014 0.58 J4 89.74 1.57 p*j.664 26.80 J5 89.58 1.51 J6 89.15 1.66 p 2.105 75.42 combi J7 89.01 1.66 j.117 4.21 J8 89.13 1.68.949 nation J9 89.12 1.62 qualifier p*j.569 20.37 J10 89.86 1.55 (N=436) J11 88.91 1.96 p 2.574 78.76 middle J12 88.55 1.75 j.052 1.58 J13 88.53 1.73.952 J14 88.96 1.78 p*j.642 19.65 J15 89.00 1.74 J16 89.37 1.58 p 1.845 68.71 J17 89.68 1.74 j.153 5.69 J18 89.71 1.49.931 J19 89.68 1.75 p*j.687 25.60 J20 88.79 1.35 J21 90.60 1.25 p 1.372 69.46 J22 90.74 1.38 j.026 1.33 J23 90.60 1.22.922 semi J24 90.51 1.53 p*j.577 29.20 J25 90.28 1.57 J26 89.80 1.99 p 3.210 85.85 (N=270) J27 90.03 1.92 Mogul J28 89.79 2.00.970 j.033 0.89 J29 89.77 1.83 p*j.496 13.27 J30 90.19 1.88 J31 90.71 1.38 p 1.36 71.75 J32 91.01 1.31 j 0.08 4.03 J33 90.59 1.34.937 (N=162) J34 91.31 1.32 p*j 0.46 24.22 J35 90.85 1.39
Table 8. analysis results 30th season J1 89.87 1.26 p 1.308 71.23 J2 90.11 1.21 J3 89.93 1.68.928 j.024 1.31 J4 90.27 1.16 J5 90.07 1.35 p*j.504 27.46 J6 89.75 1.40 p 1.239 69.28 combi J7 89.63 1.25 J8 89.75 1.49.923 j.030 1.69 nation J9 89.53 1.21 qualifier J10 89.33 1.26 p*j.519 29.03 (N=475) J11 89.41 1.38 p 1.246 68.27 middle J12 89.51 1.44 J13 89.34 1.25.919 j.032 1.75 J14 89.32 1.43 J15 89.03 1.18 p*j.547 29.98 J16 90.02 1.24 p 1.127 73.64 J17 90.01 1.22 J18 90.16 1.21.924 j.004 0.25 J19 90.10 1.22 J20 90.14 1.28 p*j.400 26.11 J21 90.40 1.13 p.994 68.38 J22 90.84 1.14 J23 90.75 1.23.923 j.043 2.97 semi J24 90.70 1.37 J25 90.96 1.04 p*j.417 28.65 J26 89.89 2.48 (N=283) p 4.419 85.79 J27 89.61 2.25 Mogul J28 89.56 2.17.969 j.026 0.50 J29 89.43 2.18 J30 89.58 2.22 p*j.706 13.71 J31 91.49 1.48 p 1.715 79.26 J32 91.86 1.46 J33 91.43 1.47.941 j.029 1.35 (N=162) J34 91.45 1.42 J35 91.59 1.48 p*j.419 19.38 Table 9. analysis results 31st season J1 89.15 1.47 p 1.445 69.56 J2 89.19 1.46 J3 89.03 1.33.920 j.004 0.17 J4 89.12 1.44 J5 89.20 1.49 p*j.629 30.27 J6 89.75 1.52 p 1.614 73.67 combi J7 89.69 1.58 J8 89.90 1.48.937 j.037 1.68 nation J9 90.18 1.54 qualifier J10 89.96 1.19 p*j.540 24.65 (N=462) J11 89.46 1.45 p 1.233 53.51 middle J12 89.58 1.63 J13 89.44 1.83.854 j.017 0.75 J14 89.21 1.30 J15 89.33 1.30 p*j 1.054 45.74 J16 89.46 1.45 p 1.423 73.76 J17 89.53 1.30 J18 89.52 1.45.942 j.065 3.36 J19 89.46 1.31 J20 90.06 1.30 p*j.441 22.88 J21 89.34 1.29 p 1.185 69.23 J22 89.46 1.21 J23 89.25 1.27.921 j.021 1.23 semi J24 89.07 1.33 J25 89.39 1.40 p*j.505 29.54 J26 90.13 1.89 (N=276) p 3.282 84.82 J27 90.01 1.99 Mogul J28 90.06 2.21.967 j.020 0.52 J29 89.77 1.88 J30 89.86 1.82 p*j.567 14.66 J31 91.38 1.71 p 2.635 84.40 J32 91.38 1.72 J33 91.51 1.84.966 j.027 0.86 (N=156) J34 91.60 1.83 J35 91.14 1.69 p*j.460 14.74
Table 10. analysis results 32nd season J1 89.72 1.41 p 1.467 70.15 J2 89.83 1.35 J3 89.90 1.55.922 j.004 0.20 J4 89.74 1.34 J5 89.86 1.56 p*j.620 29.66 J6 90.69 1.13 p 1.106 72.49 combi J7 90.52 1.20 J8 90.83 1.33.943 j.084 5.53 nation J9 90.13 1.16 qualifier J10 90.24 1.17 p*j.335 21.98 (N=348) J11 89.68 1.85 p 2.762 76.93 middle J12 90.18 2.19 J13 89.79 1.91.947 j.060 1.68 J14 89.52 1.61 J15 89.68 1.79 p*j.768 21.39 J16 90.90 1.24 p 1.428 76.81 J17 90.69 1.34 J18 90.71 1.47.950 j.058 3.13 J19 90.26 1.24 J20 90.80 1.40 p*j.373 20.06 J21 91.32 1.34 p 1.430 75.99 J22 91.16 1.36 J23 91.42 1.39.945 j.036 1.94 semi J24 90.97 1.30 J25 91.00 1.41 p*j.415 22.08 J26 88.97 2.27 (N=272) p 4.551 89.76 J27 89.32 2.21 Mogul J28 89.18 2.35.979 j.031 0.62 J29 89.27 2.13 J30 88.91 2.26 p*j.488 9.62 J31 91.61 1.51 p 1.505 76.73 J32 91.73 1.30 J33 92.19 1.32.949 j.050 2.53 (N=126) J34 91.71 1.31 J35 91.70 1.47 p*j.407 20.74 Table 11. analysis results 33rd season J1 90.15 1.22 p 1.399 74.61 J2 90.01 1.38 J3 89.68 1.35.941 j.040 2.14 J4 90.19 1.54 J5 89.96 1.26 p*j.436 23.25 J6 89.91 1.41 p 1.401 73.40 combi J7 90.07 1.38 J8 90.00 1.39.933 j.005 0.27 nation J9 90.09 1.32 qualifier J10 89.93 1.41 p*j.502 26.32 (N=398) J11 89.42 1.50 p 1.685 73.81 middle J12 89.68 1.50 J13 89.59 1.51.935 j.019 0.85 J14 89.82 1.43 J15 89.69 1.55 p*j.578 25.34 J16 89.62 1.21 p.978 69.97 J17 89.47 1.25 J18 88.88 1.13.935 j.077 5.53 J19 89.27 1.10 J20 89.22 1.04 p*j.342 24.50 J21 90.73 1.52 p 1.212 66.46 J22 90.45 1.38 J23 90.04 1.23.917 j.064 3.51 semi J24 90.55 1.13 J25 90.52 1.33 p*j.548 30.03 J26 87.76 3.17 (N=299) p 8.729 93.06 J27 87.59 3.00 Mogul J28 87.91 3.07.986 j.030 0.32 J29 88.08 3.00 J30 87.85 3.05 p*j.621 6.62 J31 91.11 1.36 p 1.955 81.24 J32 91.49 1.51 J33 91.25 1.51.958 j.018 0.73 (N=134) J34 91.16 1.64 J35 91.28 1.69 p*j.434 18.03
Ⅱ
Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ
Ann. K. S. (2007). Appropriateness of Dance Performance Assessment by Trimmed Mean Method, Journal of Korea Sport Research, 18(5), 709-718. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. NY: Springer-Verlag. Bae. J. K.(2004) Fairness of Trimmed Mean Method for Assessing a Dance Performance. Korea sport research, 15(2), 275-288. Baumgartner, T. A., & Jackson, A. S. (2006). Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science (8th). Dubuque, IA : WCB McGraw-Hill. Cho. J. H. (2006). An analysis of sources of error and optimal condition of generalizability coefficient in the Korean national bowling player selective match. Korea journal of physical edcuation. 45(6), 157-167. Choi. Y. S. (2010). Performance Assessment for Modern Dance Competitors of Dong-A Concours (2002 2009). The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 12(2). 1-11. Choi. Y. S. (2011). Analyzing the Judges rating in Modern Dance Competitors of Dong-A Concours through Many-Faceted Rasch Model. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 13(2). 53-62. Cho. E. H. & Choi. Y. L. (2015). Analysis of Error Sources in Results of Evaluation of Difficulty(D) and Execution(E) by Judges of Rhythmic Gymnastics Competition. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 17(3), 13-22. Cho. E. H. (2016). Analysis of error source in subjective evaluation results on Taekwondo Poomsae: Application of generalizability theory. Journal of the Korean data & information science society. 27(2), 359-407. Kim. D. Y. & Heo. J. G. (2002). Generalizability Coefficient Estimation of Subjectively Volleyball Test. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science. 4(2), 15-28. Kim. M. Y. (2003). Objectivity in the Judgement of Figure Skating Performance. Korea journal of physical education. 45(2), 745-755. Kim. Y. J. & Kim. E. J. (2005) A Study on the Degree of Perfection and the Objectivity of Judges' Scores for Women's Gymnastics. Korea Sport Research, 16(5), 1087-1096. Kim. W. K. (2007) Interjudge Objectivity of Taekwondo Poomsae Competition, Journal of Korea Sport Research, 18(4), 823-830. Kim. H. D., Woo. D. I. & Kim. E. J. (2011) Objectivity of International Aerobics Referee decision. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 13(2), 63-73. Korea Ski Instructor Association(2017) http://www.ksia.co.kr Lee. T. K., Lee. H. J., Chung. J. E. & Yang. H. W. (2016). Analysis of Judges Judging in Figure Skating, Korean Journal of Sport Science, 27(4), 756-769. Moon. C. Y. (2006). Evaluation of Holistic Methods in Judgment of Sports Performance. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 8(2), 59-74. Oh. S. H., Kim. S. J. & Lee. Y. K. (2001). An Objectivity of a Performance Assessment Instrument in Dance. The Korean Journal Of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science, 3(1), 81-87. Oh, S. H. & Lee. B. Y. (2002) Introduction to Objectivity and its Usage. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 4(1), 1-12.
Shin. J. Y., Cho. E. H. & Eom. H. J. (2015). An Objective Index for Subjective Judgements of Experts: Comparison of Inter-rater Agreement Coefficients. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 54(6), 601-616. Seok. J. S., Kang. S. K. & Lee. J. H. (2016). Objectivity Evaluation of the Ski Level II Test. The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sport Science, 18(2), 63-76.