122
123 Intangible assets 1) IP OECD IBM TI IP R&D
124 Rivette and Kline 2) 3) IP Patent Troll Acacia Research Corporation 4) MS AOL 5) 6) IP IP IP IP
125 IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP Stevens IP Nikolic IP IP Amable et alip IP IP Patents Copyrights Trademarks 7) IP IPRs IP sale and lease back IP Aberlyn Capital Management radio-pharmaceutical products RhoMed IP 8)
126 IP IP IP IP Bader et. al. 9) IP IP IP IP IP IP Monk 10)
127 IP IP IP IP 11) IP IP IP Intermediaries IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP NPEsNon-Practicing Entities IP defensive
128 aggregatorip offensive aggregator NPEs IP IP IP IP IP IP NPEs IP IP IP IP IP 12) IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IDIntellectual Discovery IP IP IP Sale and License BackIP Pool Syndication Pre Sale & Profit SharingIP M&A PEFIPIP litigation fund 13) IP
129 IPRs 14) IPRs IPRs IP 15) IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IPRs IP NPEs IP IP 16) IP IP 17) IP
130 IP IP IPRs Chen and Lin 18) MIT technology Review CHI Research Ins 19) IPXIIntellectual Property Exchange International, Inc IPRs IP IP IP IP IP IP 20) IP IP IPXIIntellectual Property Exchange International, Inc Ocean Tomo IP IP
131 IPXI IP IP IPXI IP Unit License Right Contract ULR ULR ULR IP Secondary Market IPXI IP IPXI ULR IP IPXI ULR A
132 ULR ULR ULR ULR ULR ULR IPXI IP NPEs IP ULR Phillips, Chicago Board Options Exchange HoldingsCom-Pac InternationalRutgersNorthwesternUtah ULR IPXI IP Unit IP IP IPXI IP IP
133 IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP
134 21) M&A IP Wall Street Journal Patent Scorecard Ocean Tomo Patent Index 22) Patent Board 23) Patent Scorecard Patent Board
135 Patent Board Patent scorecard QualityQuantityScienceSpeed Quality Technology StrengthIndustry Impact Quantity Science Science Strength Research IntensitySpeed Innovation Cycle Time ipiq Technology Strength Industry Impact Science Strength Research Intensity Innovation Cycle Time
136 Patent Board Patent Scorecard IT
137 Apple IT IT IT IT Google LG IT LG
138 LG Notel Network Nokia RIM Blackberry Motorola Alcatel-Lucent Patent Scorecard Blackberry Patent Scorecard IP IP S&P
139 24) IP Ocean Tomo IP Patent Index Ocean Tomo Patent IndexOT IP IP OT multi-generation citation 25)
140 Innovation Ratio OT OT Ocean Tomo atentratings System S&P OT OT IP OT
141 OT Ocean Tomo PatentRatings System IP OT IP Index IP
142 IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IPXI IP unit IP IP IP
143 IP Patent Board Patent Scorecard Ocean Tomo Patent Index IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP IP
144 IP
145 Hand, J. and Lev, B. Intangible Assets: Values, Measures, and Risks, Oxford University Press, 2003. Martin, D. E., and Watson, J. O., Patent Valuation: Is Fair Market Fair?, Lim. E.H. et al., Patent in the Financial Services Industry: What You Need to Know?, Vol.1, PLI, New York, 2004. Amable, B., Chatelain, J.-B., and Kirsten Ralf, K.,Patents as collateral, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol.28 No.3(2010). Calderini, M. and Odasso, M.C., Intellectual property portfolio securitization: an evidence based analysis, Innovation Studies Working Paper, 1(2008). Chen, D.-Z., Lin, W.-Y., and Huang, M.-H., Using essential patent index and essential technological strength to evaluate industrial technological innovation competitiveness, Scientometrics, Vol.71 No.1(2007). Lerner, J. and Tufano, P., Aberlyn Capital Management: July 1993, Harvard Business School Case, No.294083(1994). Monk, A., The emerging market for intellectual property: drivers, restrainers, and implications, Journal of Economic Geography, Vol.9 No.4(2009). Nikolic, A., Securitization of Patents and Its Continued Viability in Light of the Current Economic Conditions, Alb. LJ Sci. & Tech. Vol.19(2009). Rivette, K. G. and Kline, D.,Discovering New Value in Intellectual Property, Harvard Business Review, Vol.55(2000) Stevens, P. Security Interests in Patents and Patent Applications, Pitt. J. Tech. L. & Pol'y, Vol.6(2005). Wang, A.W., Rise of the patent intermediaries, Berkeley Tech. LJ, Vol.25(2010).
146 Bader, M.A., et al. Creating a financial market for IPR, Institute of Technology Management, Univ. of St. Gallen, 2011.12.6. OECD, OECD Factbook 2009: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics, ParisL: OECD, 2009. OECD, Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2006, 2006. Technology Review and CHI Research, Technology Review Patent Scorecard, 2004. Yanagisawa, T. and Guellec, D., The emerging patent marketplace. No.2009/9., OECD Publishing, 2009. <http://www.ipxi.com/>. <http://www.marketwatch.com/>. <http://www.patentboard.com/>. <http://www.oceantomo.com/productsandservices/investments/indexes/ot 300>. <http://www.intellectualventures.com/>. <http://www.rpxcorp.com/>. <http://www.alliedsecuritytrust.com/>. <http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57496641-38/inside-intellectualventures-the-most-hated-company-in-tech/>. <http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2006-07-02/inside-nathanmyhrvolds-mysterious-new-idea-machine>. <http://www.ipxi.com/images/cfa_magazine_nov-dec_2012_get_smarts. pdf>. <http://www.nationalmagazine.ca/articles/september-2012-issue/licensedto-know.aspx>. <http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-08-28/former-microsoftexecutive-to-seek-3-billion-for-patent-fund>. <http://www.dt.co.kr/contexts.html?article_no=2013030402010151759002>.
147 <http://www.acaciaresearch.com/docs/acaciafactsheet4thqtr2012.pdf>. <http://www.itworld.co.kr/news/78907>. <http://article.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.asp?total_id=9161100&cloc =olink article default>.
148 The Journal of Intellectual Property Vol.8 No.3 September 2013 A New Paradigm of IP-based Finance: Insights from Novel IP-based Financing Models Kyung Seo & Youngkwan Kwon Abstract Under knowledge-based economy that intangible assets become major influences on economic growth, a variety of efforts for activating IP-backed finance are recently developed in Korea. However, it is highly uncertain that on-going efforts focusing on activation of IP assets transactions, defensive aggregator, patent loans, etc. because of the unique characteristics of IP assets. This paper seeks to find new directions for activating IP-based financing by examining advanced IPbased finance business models, which is recently emerging and may be more effective and direct ones that could overcome structural limitation of IP assets transactions. As a result, we suggest that new approaches to establish IP assets monetization platforms in favor of potential licensees of IP assets or more direct financing system for IP assets based on objective IP-based indicators or indexes can become new paradigm. We hope that this paper is expected to be the foundation stone of future researches seeking new policy directions for activating IP-based finance. Keywords IP-based Finance, IP assets, IP Monetization Platform, Patent Scorecard, IP Index