Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

(5차 편집).hwp


11¹ÚÇý·É

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

<5B D B3E220C1A634B1C720C1A632C8A320B3EDB9AEC1F628C3D6C1BE292E687770>

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

歯14.양돈규.hwp


,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

5/12¼Ò½ÄÁö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

KD hwp

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

,......

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * The Meaning of Pl

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree


상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

<35BFCFBCBA2E687770>

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析


대한한의학원전학회지24권6호-전체최종.hwp

현대패션의 로맨틱 이미지에 관한 연구

이용석 박환용 - 베이비부머의 특성에 따른 주택유형 선택 변화 연구.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

서론 34 2

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

<B1B3B9DFBFF83330B1C7C1A631C8A35FC6EDC1FDBABB5FC7D5BABB362E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

IKC43_06.hwp

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

Æ÷Àå82š

歯kjmh2004v13n1.PDF

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>


03신경숙내지작업

서론

<B3EDB9AEC1FD5F3235C1FD2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: Exploring Education

00내지1번2번

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<31362DB1E8C7FDBFF82DC0FABFB9BBEA20B5B6B8B3BFB5C8ADC0C720B1B8C0FC20B8B6C4C9C6C32E687770>

<B1A4B0EDC8ABBAB8C7D0BAB8392D345F33C2F75F E687770>

,.,,. (Vocational Ethics) (, 1999), Brown(2012). (, 2004).,,,,, ,400 (,,, 2011;, 2006)., (, 2006; Brown, 2012). (harm) (, 2006). NCDA(National

<353420B1C7B9CCB6F52DC1F5B0ADC7F6BDC7C0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120BEC6B5BFB1B3C0B0C7C1B7CEB1D7B7A52E687770>

< FC3D6C1BEBCF6C1A45FB1E2B5B6B1B3B1B3C0B0B3EDC3D E687770>

09김정식.PDF

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Difference in Paren

Rheu-suppl hwp

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.577-601 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.4.201812.577 3 * The Effect of Home-based Activities Using Traditional Fairy Tales on Personality Development of 3-year-old Children Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of family-based activities using traditional fairy tales on the development of personality 3-year-olds. Method: For this study. H kindergarten which is located in S city of Gangwon province was divided into experimental group and comparative group for 3-year-old and 22 young children. Among them, the experiment group was conducted with the family association activity. In order to verify the effect of this study, pre-test and post-test were performed by using the developmental evaluation tool for young children, developed by Baek(2015). We selected traditional fairy tales to perform personality education activities. Based on these, we developed a home-based activity and carried out activities for 13 weeks from January 10, 2018 to February 26, 2018 for seven weeks. Results: The results of the study are as follows: First of all, the group that conducted home-related activities using traditional fairy tales showed a higher personality test score than the group that did not conduct home-based activities, which is statistically significant. Secondly, It was found that the group, which conducted home-based activities by using traditional fairy tales, is positively affected on sharing, respect, order, responsibility, and cooperation among the sub-categories of children's personality (which is sharing, caring, etiquette, patience, respect, order, responsibility, cooperation, honesty) than the group that did not conduct home-based activities. The results of this study are similar to those of the previous studies(shin, 2017; Yoon, 2016; Jang, 2015) in which personality education activities are positively influenced on children's personality when these activities are carried out not only in early childhood education institution but also conducted in based with home. Conclusion: Therefore, we hope to find out the educational activities that can be carried out by the home and early childhood education institutions in the field of early childhood education and actively utilize them to plan the cultivation of childhood personality. Key words : traditional fairy tales, home-based, personality development * 1 2018. Corresponding Author: Hwang, Yoon-Se. Kangwon National University, Dept. of Early Childhood Education, Hwangjo-gil, Dogye-eup, Samcheok-si, Kangwon-do, Korea, e-mail: yshwang@kangwon.ac.kr

..,,,,., (2011). (, 2005; Berkowitz, 2002). Lee(2013).. (, 2013)... (, 2005).,,.,,, (, 2005).,,,,,. (,,, 2012),,,,,. (, 2008)., (2015),. (2007),. (2017),.

. (2006),., (, 2014),,,, (,, 2007;, 2004;, 2008;, 2008), (, 2010).,,,,,,. Epstein(2001) (, 2014). Berkowitz(2002)..,.., (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2008), (, 2012). (, 2014; Epstein, 2001) (2015) 4. 3,. (, 2018;, 2008),. 3. 3., (, 2011)..

.. 1. 3? 2. 3?. 3.,,,,. H 3 22. 11, 11. 5, 6 11, 7, 4 11. 2 8. 1.

. (2015). 1) 검사도구의구성,,,,,,,, 9. 5, 10, 10, 10, 11, 7, 8, 8, 12 81. Cronbach's α.98, Cronbach's α.85.96. 2) 검사방법.. 3) 채점방법 Likert 6. (1 ),,,,, (6 ), (1 ) (6 ).. 40 57. 1) 교사교육및일치도 1 2 3.,,,,..

5,.93. 2) 사전검사 1 5 1 9 3 22 ( 3 11, 3 11 ).,. 3) 실험처치..,.. 4) 사후검사 11, 11 2018 2 27 28. 3 2018 1 10 2018 2 26 7 13. 1) 전래동화선정 (2012) 3 5

,,,,, 6 1. 1 (2013) (,,, ).. () 1 (1 10 ) 2 (1 15 ) 3 (1 17 ) 4 (1 22 ) 5 (1 24 ) 6 (1 29 ) 7 (1 31 ) 8(2 5 ) 9(2 7 )

( ) () 10 (2 12 ) 11 (2 19 ) 12 (2 21 ) 13 (2 26 ) 2) 전래동화를활용한활동 13,,,, 2..,,.,,,. 2011. 5,.,.. < -3>..

1 2, 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10 11 12 13 () : (), :,, :, :,... 3) 활동개발과정,,... 3..

SPSS WIN 13.0.,. (Cronbach's α). - t. (Analysis of Covariance: ANCOVA).. 3, 3 (,,,,,,,, ) t, < -1>. (n=11) (n=11) M SD M SD t 338.36 44.57 318.36 54.44.94 18.55 5.30 18.91 4.55 -.17 42.09 6.17 39.36 6.90.97 43.45 6.46 37.82 6.49 2.04 39.82 6.59 37.09 7.11.93 45.27 6.71 42.82 7.35.81 33.18 3.19 28.55 6.73 2.06 32.91 6.02 29.82 6.08 1.19 31.91 5.72 33.09 4.55 -.53 51.18 8.75 50.91 7.92.07

, (,,,,,,,, ). 1) 전래동화를활용한가정연계활동이인성전체에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -2>, < -3>. < -2> -,, < -3>., (F (1,19) =12.77, p<.01). ( ).40 40%., 370.20 337.61., 3. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 338.36(44.57) 377.82(37.04) 370.20 11 318.36(54.44) 330.00(48.27) 337.61 F () 28700.06 1 28700.06 65.57 *** () 5592.94 1 5592.94 12.77 ** 8315.57 19 437.66-2805128.00 22 - - ** p<.01, *** p<.001

2) 전래동화를활용한가정연계활동이인성각하위요인에미치는영향 (1) 나눔에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -4> < -5>. < -5> -,, < -7>., (F (1,19) =11.22, p<.01). ( ).37 37%., 23.29 19.44., 3. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 18.55(5.30) 23.18(2.60) 23.29 11 18.91(4.55) 19.55(4.84) 19.44 F () 164.76 1 164.76 22.75 *** () 81.30 1 81.30 11.22 ** 137.59 19 7.24 10416.00 22 ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (2) 배려에미치는영향 3, (, ),

(ANCOVA), < -6> < -7>. < -6> -,, < -7>.,.,. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 42.09(6.17) 47.09(4.44) 46.20 11 39.36(6.90) 41.64(7.37) 42.53 *** p<.001 F () 366.20 1 366.20 18.64 *** () 70.79 1 70.79 3.60 373.24 19 19.64-44202.00 22 - - (3) 예절에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -8> < -9>. < -8> -,, < -9>.,.,.

n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 43.45(6.46) 46.73(5.46) 44.73 11 37.82(6.49) 40.18(6.13) 42.18 F () 421.89 1 421.89 31.81 *** () 29.52 1 29.52 2.22 251.92 19 13.25-42452.00 22 - - *** p<.001 (4) 인내에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -10> < -11>. < -10> -,, < -11>.,.,. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 39.82(6.59) 45.73(5.41) 44.72 11 37.09(7.11) 40.82(6.55) 41.83

F () 517.07 1 517.07 47.98 *** () 43.85 1 43.85 4.07 204.73 19 10.77-42050.00 22 - - *** p<.001 (5) 존중에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -12> < -13>. < -12> -,, < -13>., (F (1,19) =8.72, p<.01). ( ).31 31%., 48.70 42.76., 3. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 45.27(6.71) 49.36(4.39) 48.70 11 42.82(7.35) 42.09(7.13) 42.76

F () 292.52 1 292.52 13.59 *** () 187.67 1 187.67 8.72 ** 408.93 19 21.52-46994.00 22 - - ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (6) 질서에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -14> < -15>. < -14> -,, < -15>., (F (1,19) =4.72, p<.05). ( ).19 19%., 32.35 28.56., 3. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 33.18(3.19) 33.82(3.87) 32.35 11 28.55(6.73) 27.09(5.79) 28.56

F () 223.27 1 223.27 16.23 *** () 64.94 1 64.94 4.72 * 261.27 19 13.75-21138.00 22 - - * p<.05, *** p<.001 (7) 책임에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -16> < -17>. < -16> -,, < -17>., (F (1,19) =4.48, p<.05). ( ).19 19%., 35.99 31.74., 3. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 32.91(6.02) 37.18(6.24) 35.99 11 29.82(6.08) 30.55(6.62) 31.74

F () 434.65 1 434.65 20.97 *** () 92.93 1 92.93 4.48 * 393.71 19 20.72-26299.00 22 - - * p<.05, *** p<.001 (8) 협력에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -18> < -19>. < -18> -,, < -19>., (F (1,19) =4.52, p<.05). ( ).19 19%., 37.67 34.15., 3. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 31.91(5.72) 37.36(5.41) 37.67 11 33.09(4.55) 34.45(3.56) 34.15

F () 138.50 1 138.50 9.37 ** () 66.84 1 66.84 4.52 * 280.71 19 14.77-28834.00 22 - - * p<.05, ** p<.01 (9) 정직에미치는영향 3, (, ), (ANCOVA), < -20> < -21>. < -20> -,, < -21>.,.,. n M(SD) M(SD) M 11 51.18(8.75) 57.36(8.44) 57.28 11 50.91(7.92) 53.64(5.26) 53.72 F () 519.94 1 519.94 21.05 *** () 69.70 1 69.70 2.82 469.14 19 24.69-68831.00 22 - - *** p<.001

. 3..,,.,,,,,,. 4 (2015). (2016),..,, (, 2014),,,, (,, 2007;, 2004;, 2008;, 2008), (, 2010).,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,, (2014),, (2015).,,,. 3. (, 2012), 3 6. (2008)

3.,,,,. (, 2017;, 2016;, 2012).,., -. (2013). Berkowitz(2002),,....,,.,,,,,., -..,,.

..,..,.,.., 7 13..., 3.... (2008)...,, (2012).,,. (3), 181-201. (2011). :. (2012). :. (2014)... (2013)...

(2007)... (2014)..., (2007).. (2), 193-204., (2012).. (4), 221-244. (2015)... (2008)... (2013). :. (2018). 3.. (2010)... (2017)... (2008). 3.. (2012). VPE. (6), 451-464. (2005).. (1), 37-48. (2006).. (2016)... (2004)... (2017). 4.. (2007)... (2016)..

. (2008)... (2012)... (2008). : (2012)... (2013)... (2015). 4 :,,. (3), 1-20. (2008)...,. (2014).. (5), 229-248. (2015).. (1), 23-38. Berkowitz, M. W. (2002). The science of character education. W. Damon(Ed.), Bringing in a new era of character education (pp. 43-63), Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press. Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools boulder. Co: West view Press. Josepson (2002). Making ethical decision. Los Angels. CA: Josepson Institute of Ethics. Lee, G. L. (2013). Re-emphasizing character education in early childhood programs: Koreas children's experiences. Childhood Education, 89(5), 315-322. : 2018.11.07. / : 2018.11.12. / : 2018.12.20.

3 : 3. : S H 3 22,.., 2018 1 10 2018 2 26 7 13. :.,,.,,,,,. :