에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 89~114 정책 일본의 CO 2 배출, 원자력에너지, 신재생에너지관계분석 *

Similar documents
에너지경제연구 제12권 제2호

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 1~29 정책 용도별특성을고려한도시가스수요함수의 추정 :, ARDL,,, C4, Q4-1 -

에너지경제연구 제12권 제2호

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 1, March 2018 : pp. 37~65 가정부문전기수요의결정요인분석 : 동태적패널 FD GMM 기법을중심으로 37

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 95~118 학술 탄소은행제의가정용전력수요절감효과 분석 1) 2) 3) * ** *** 95

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 1, March 2018 : pp. 67~94 기온효과를반영한 한국의환경쿠즈네츠가설검정 ** *** :,,,, *. ** ( ), ***

2

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 14, Number 2, September 2015 : pp. 99~126 산유국의재생에너지정책결정요인분석 1) 99

에너지경제연구제 16 권제 1 호 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 16, Number 1, March 2017 : pp. 35~55 학술 전력시장가격에대한역사적요인분해 * 35

부문별 에너지원 수요의 변동특성 및 공통변동에 미치는 거시적 요인들의 영향력 분석

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 1~26 실물옵션을이용한해상풍력실증단지 사업의경제성평가 1

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 1~18 가격비대칭성검정모형민감도분석 1

공휴일 전력 수요에 관한 산업별 분석

에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부

164

IDP www idp or kr IDP 정책연구 한국경제의구조적문제와개혁방향 민주정책연구원 The Institute for Democracy and Policies

조재욱D)-63-88


에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 18, Number 1, March 2019 : pp 에너지전환정책및고령화가국민경제에미치는영향 : 확률적중첩세대일반균형모형 (Stochastic Overlapping Genera

에너지경제연구 제13권 제1호

에너지경제연구 제14권 제1호

09김정식.PDF

5-김재철

192

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 85~114 산업별에너지원간대체관계추정을통한탄소세의 CO 2 감축효과분석 * 85

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 57~83 발전용유연탄가격과여타상품가격의 동조화현상에대한실증분석 57

통합 창원시의 해양관광 현황과 개선방안

국제무역론-02장

*5£00̽ÅÈ�

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 19~41 석유제품브랜드의자산가치측정 : 휘발유를 중심으로 19

¨è ¿¬Â÷º¸°í¼Ł³»Áö-1 PDF

06_À̼º»ó_0929


<C7A5C1F620BEE7BDC4>

<C3D6C1BE2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D32C8A3292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte


09구자용(489~500)

歯표지_최종H_.PDF

KDI정책포럼제221호 ( ) ( ) 내용문의 : 이재준 ( ) 구독문의 : 발간자료담당자 ( ) 본정책포럼의내용은 KDI 홈페이지를 통해서도보실수있습니다. 우리나라경

04김호걸(39~50)ok

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

조사연구 권 호 연구논문 한국노동패널조사자료의분석을위한패널가중치산출및사용방안사례연구 A Case Study on Construction and Use of Longitudinal Weights for Korea Labor Income Panel Survey 2)3) a

논총13집.PDF

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

01이정훈(113~127)ok

Microsoft PowerPoint - Freebairn, John_ppt


afoco백서-내지.indd

아태연구(송석원) hwp

(5차 편집).hwp

대구전시컨벤션센터 전시행사의 지역경제 파급효과 분석

10¿ÀÁ¤ÁØ

03-최신데이터

歯4차학술대회원고(장지연).PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


#Ȳ¿ë¼®

......(N)

기획7.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***

<C7D1B1B9B0E6C1A6BFACB1B8C7D0C8B828C0CCC1BEBFF85FC0CCBBF3B5B75FBDC5B1E2B9E9292E687770>

<3329C0CCC7E5C3A22E687770>

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

<C5EBC0CFB0FA20C6F2C8AD2E687770>

2016-국가봄-6-정은숙( ).hwp

EU탄소배출거래제보고_ hwp

_ _ Reading and Research in Archaeology. _ Reading and Research in Korean Historical Texts,,,,,. _Reading and Research in Historical Materials from Ko

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

에너지경제연구 제13권 제2호

의정연구_36호_0828.hwp

보건사회연구-25일수정

<C3D6C1BE5FBFACB1B8BAB8B0EDBCAD D30335FC1B6B5BFC3B65FBFECB8AEB0E6C1A6C0C7BFAAB5BFBCBA5F6B E687770>

pdf 16..

44-4대지.07이영희532~

untitled

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

¹ýÁ¶ 12¿ù ¼öÁ¤.PDF

박선영무선충전-내지

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

2월1일자.hwp

요 약 대한민국은 1948년 정부수립 이후 60년 만에 세계 13위의 경제대국으로 비약적인 성 장을 이루었다. 정부수립 2년 만에 북한의 전격 남침으로 전 국토가 초토화되었고, 휴 전 이후에도 안보에 대한 위협은 계속되었다. 그러나 대한민국 국민은 불리한 여건에 좌절하

Microsoft Word K_01_07.docx

03이경미(237~248)ok

<B9DABCBCC1A45FBCB1B9CCBCF6C1A42E687770>

±×¸°¸®Æ÷Æ® ³»Áö5Â÷

Vol.257 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

08최봉석ㆍ구지선.hwp

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 11, Number 2, September 2012 : pp. 141~163 신재생에너지지원정책의지대발생효과와규제 : 신재생에너지공급의무화제도 (RPS) 를중심으로 141

<2D3828C8AE29B9DAC3B5B1D42E687770>



Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

Transcription:

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 17, Number 2, September 2018 : pp. 89~114 정책 일본의 CO 2 배출, 원자력에너지, 신재생에너지관계분석 * - 89 -

- 90 -

- 91 -

- 92 -

- 93 -

- 94 -

. ~ - 95 -

ln ln ln ln ln ln - 96 -

ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln - 97 -

ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln ln - 98 -

. - 99 -

< 표 1> 변수기초통계량 - 100 -

[ 그림 1] 주요변수추세 배출량 인당에너지소비량 원자력발전량 신재생에너지발전량 ln - 101 -

ln < 표 2> 단위근검정 ln ln ln ln ln ln - 102 -

< 표 3> ARDL- 한계검정 ln ln ln ln ln 한계검정 - 103 -

< 표 4> ARDL(1,0,0,0,0) 모형추정 ln ln ln ln ln ln - 104 -

[ 그림 2] ARDL 모형의 CUSUM 검정과 CUSUMSQ 검정 [ 그림 3] ARDL 모형의탄소배출량예측력 - 105 -

< 표 5> ARDL 오차수정모형 ln ln ln ln ln ln - 106 -

[ 그림 3] 단기추정모형의 CUSUM 검정과 CUSUMSQ 검정 - 107 -

< 표 6> CO 2 배출량장 단기탄력성추정 - 108 -

접수일 (2018 년 7 월 13 일 ), 수정일 (2018 년 8 월 25 일 ), 게재확정일 (2018 년 9 월 27 일 ) - 109 -

. 2015., GDP,. 14(1): 35-64.. 2011. 1 CO 2. KIET 2011(4): 41-53.. 2015. CO2. 14(3): 185-201.. 2014.. 62(3): 5-28.. 2013.. 12(2): 59-83.. 2013.., 12(3): 97-122.. 2012. CO 2,. 21(2): 271-297.. 2014. -. 23(4): 115-145. Apergis, N. and Payne, J. E. 2009. CO 2 Emissions, Energy Usage, and Output in Central America. Energy Policy 37: 3282-3286. Asano, K. 2013. Costs Estimation for Renewable Electricity Policies in Japan, IEEE, Sendai Conference Proceeding: 26-29. Baek, J. 2016. Do Nuclear and Renewable Energy Improve the Environment? Empirical Evidence from the United States. Ecological Indicators 66: 325-356. Baek, J. and Kim, H. S. 2013. Is Economic Growth Good or Bad for the Environment? Empirical Evidence from Korea. Energy Economics 36: 744-749. - 110 -

Baek, J. and Kim, H. S. 2011. Trade Liberalization, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and the Environment: Time Series Evidence from G-20 Countries. Journal of East Asia Economic Integration 15: 3-32. Baek, J. and Pride, D. 2014. On the Income-Nuclear-Energy-CO 2 Emissions Nexus Revisited. Energy Economics, 43: 6-10. Bento, C., Paulo, J. and Moutinho, V. 2016. CO 2 Emissions, Non-renewable and Renewable Electricity Production, Economic Growth, and International Trade in Italy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55(C): 142-155. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J. and Evans, J. M. 1975. Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relations over Time. Journal of Royal Statistical Society 37: 149-163. Climate Change Performance Index(CCPI). 2017. Results 2017 Dogan, E. and Seker, F. 2016. Determinants of CO 2 emissions in the European Union: The Role of Renewable and Non-renewable Energy. Renewable Energy 94: 429-439. Fosu, A. K. and Magnus, F. J. 2006 Bounds Testing Approach to Conintegration: An Examination of Foreign Direct Investment Trade and Growth Relationships. American Journal of Applied Sciences 3(11): 2079-2085. Grossman, G. and Krueger, A. 1993. Environmental Impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement. In: Peter Garber, editor. The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, L. and Black, W. C. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. IAEA. 2016. Country Nucelar Power Profile, linked to https://www-pub.iaea.org/mtcd/ publications/pdf/cnpp2016/countryprofiles/japan/japan.htm Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC), 2007. Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. Geneva, Switzerland. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC), 2013. Seventh Assessment Report: Climate Change 2013. Geneva, Switzerland. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2016, Energy Policies of IEA Countries Japan, 2016 Review. - 111 -

Iwata, H., Okada, K. and Samreth, S. 2010. Empirical Study on the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO 2 in France: the Role of Nuclear Energy. Energy Policy 38: 4057-63. Iwata, H., Okada, K. and Samreth, S. 2011. A Note on the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO 2 : a Pooled Mean Group Approach. Applied Energy 88: 1986-1996. Jalil, A. and Mahmud, S. F. 2009. Environment Kuznets Curve for CO 2 Emissions: a Cointegration Analysis for China. Energy Policy 37: 5167-5172. Kijima, M., Nishide, K. and Ohyama, A. 2010. Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: A survey. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34(7): 1187-1201 Kwiatkowski, D, Phillips, P., Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. 1992. Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationary Against the Alternative of a Unit Root. Journal of Econometrics 54: 159-178. Lee, S., Kim, M., and Lee J. 2017. Analyzing the Impact of Nuclear Power on CO 2 Emissions. Sustainability 9:1-13. Liu, X. 2005. Explaining the Relationship between CO 2 Emissions and National Income - the Role of Energy Consumption. Economic Letters 87: 325-328. Marques, A. C., Fuinhas, J. A. and Menegaki, A. N. 2016. Renewable vs Non-renewable Electricity and the Industrial Production Nexus: Evidence from an ARDL Bounds Test Approach for Greece. Renewable Energy 96: 645-665. Menyah, K. and Wolde-Rufael, Y. 2010. CO 2 Emissions, Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy and Economic Growth in the US. Energy Policy 38: 2911-2915. Narayan, P. K. 2005. The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests. Applied economics 37(17): 1979-1990. Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. 1995. An Autoregressive Distributed-lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. In Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, ed. S. Strøm, chap. 11, 371-413. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - 112 -

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith R. 2001. Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationship, Journal of Applied Economics, 16: 289-326. Phillips, P. and Perron, P. 1988. Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika 75: 335-346. Richmond, A. K., and Kaufman, R. K. 2006. Is There a Turning Point in the Relationship between Income and Energy Use and/or Carbon Emissions? Ecological Economics 56: 176-89. Stern, D. I. 2004. The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development 32(8): 1419-1439. Sebri, M. and Ben-Salha, O. 2014. On the Causal Dynamics between Economic Growth, Renewable Energy Consumption, CO 2 emissions and Trade Openness: Fresh Evidence from BRICS Countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39: 14-23. Shafiei, S. and Salim, R. A. 2014. Non-renewable and Renewable Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis. Energy Policy 66: 547-556. Soytas, U., Sari, R. and Ewing, B. T. 2007. Energy Consumption, Income, and Carbon Emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 62: 482-489. World Nuclear Association (WNA). 2012. Nuclear Power in Japan. World Nuclear Association (WNA). 2017. Nuclear Power in Japan. Zhang, X. P., and Cheng, X. M. 2009. Energy Consumption, Carbon Emissions, and Economic Growth in China. Ecological Economics 68: 2706-2712. - 113 -

ABSTRACT This study analyzed the long-term relationship between CO 2 emissions and energy consumption in Japan using the ARDL model. The ARDL-bound test results show that there is a cointegration between Japan's CO 2 emissions, income, energy consumption, renewable energy consumption, and nuclear energy consumption. CO 2 emissions in Japan were determined in the long term by total energy consumption and nuclear energy consumption. Nuclear energy consumption has been shown to help reduce CO 2 emissions. However, new and renewable energy has no significant effect on reducing CO 2 emissions, because the proportion of new and renewable energy is still insignificant, and it is because the new renewable energy is not produced efficiently. It can be expected that Japan would have some difficultly in fulfillment CO 2 emission abatement unless Japan resume nuclear power generation. Key Words : ARDL, CO 2, Renewables, Nuclear energy - 114 -