KISEP Original Articles J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 37, No 6 가족적응력및결속력평가척도한국어판 의 표준화예비연구 - 신뢰도및타당도 이종일 * 성덕규 * 이민규 ** A Preliminary St

Similar documents

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

012임수진


:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

,......


232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

서론 1. 연구대상 1) 정상군 연구대상및방법 2) 성격장애군 526


Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Lumbar spine

Rheu-suppl hwp

ePapyrus PDF Document

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

서론

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

1..


서론 34 2

( )Jkstro011.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

(5차 편집).hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯1.PDF

untitled

159

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

44-4대지.07이영희532~

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

<C3D6C1BEBFCFBCBA2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D31C8A3292E687770>

歯5-4-04(윤치연외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

A 617

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

278 경찰학연구제 12 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 31 호 )

12이문규

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

학습영역의 Taxonomy에 기초한 CD-ROM Title의 효과분석

Output file

박 민 철 1. 공격성 aggression 4

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

14.531~539(08-037).fm

00내지1번2번

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

구의 중요성이 인식되기 시작하였다(Kang & Lee, 2001). 이에 대한 결과로 1990 년대 이후 국내에서도 만성신부전환자의 혈액투석경험 (Shin, 1997), 신장이식 체험(Lee, 1998) 과 만성질환자의 강인성에 관한 연구 (Ko, 1999)등 만성질환

Jkcs022(89-113).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

레이아웃 1


<B1B3B9DFBFF83330B1C7C1A631C8A35FC6EDC1FDBABB5FC7D5BABB362E687770>

歯kjmh2004v13n1.PDF

09권오설_ok.hwp

歯정남운(최종).PDF

±èÇ¥³â

05_최운선_53~67,68.hwp

레이아웃 1

( ) ) ( )3) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4) 1915 ( ) ( ) ) 3) 4) 285

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

<5BC0AFBEC6B1E2C7E0BAB9B0A85D20C0CEBCE2BFEB20C3D6C1BEBABB5F F312E687770>

methods.hwp

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

hwp

03-서연옥.hwp


다는 점을 지적한 바 있다. 어느 시대나 정신질환자가 있기 마련인데, 표현형식이 어떻게 나타나느냐가 중요하며, 강남역 살인사건 피의자가 여성 혐오적 망상을 하게 된 사회적 배 경에 주목해야 한다 는 거다. 80년대 정신질환의 증상이 누군가 나를 도청하고 있다 는 서 사

184

???? 1

<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

전립선암발생률추정과관련요인분석 : The Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II (KCPS-II)

Transcription:

KISEP Original Articles 37 6 1998 J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 37, No 6 가족적응력및결속력평가척도한국어판 의 표준화예비연구 - 신뢰도및타당도 이종일 * 성덕규 * 이민규 ** A Preliminary Study on the Standardization of Korean Version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale II-a Reliability and Validity 국문초록 Jong-Il Lee, M.D.,* Deock-Kyu Seong, M.D.,* Min-Kyu Rhee, M.D.** 연구목적 : 방법 : 결과 : 결론 : 중심단어 Department of General Psychiatry, Seoul National Mental Hospital, Seoul Department of Clinical Psychology, Seoul National Mental Hospital, Seoul Corresponding author 1246

서론 1. 연구대상 1) 1 차조사 연구대상및방법 2) 2차조사 1247

2. 연구도구 1) 1차조사 (1) 적응력 (adaptability) (2) 결속력 (cohesion) 2) 2차조사 3. 통계분석방법 1) 신뢰도검증 2) 타당도검증 1248

Table 1. Communalities and factor loading of K-FACES II items Factor Items h2 Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 Factor 6 Factor 1 Ite m 7.61.65.17.12 Item 1.51.56.09.08 Item 18.52.55.19.11.13 Item 17.56.50.40.10.07 Item 8.51.50.07.13.07 Item 10.43.16.05.19 Factor 2 Item 2.49.19.58.02.15.10 Item 6.40.16.53.15.04 Item 23.09.52.19.01.06 Item 30.49.47.10.16 Item 25.48.45.15.04 Factor 3 Item 21.69.11.75.16.14.05 Item 28.45.54.14.06.10 Item 27.11.43.11.06 Item 15.04.04 Factor 4 Item 4.47.07.19.15.60.02 Item 26.72.40.55.17.10 Item 3.05.11.01.52.11 Ite m 5.62.47.15.51.08 Item 24.02.00.01.01 Factor 5 Item 13.54.12.14.16.64.06 Item 14.57.04.12.62.08 Item 22.65.04.52.04.52.19 Factor 6 Item 12.61.17.08.08.65 Item 29.15.12.16.19 a.83.75.71.75.71.48 Eigenvalue 2.64 2.58 2 1.94 1.69 1 K-FACESKorean version of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale Cronbach s alpha 3) 변별타당도검증 결과 1. 요인의추출 1249

Table 2. ReliabilityCronbach s alpha and corrected item-total correlation of the items of FACES II Subscale a Items Corrected item-total correlation S1.83 I 7.70 I 1.61 I18.56 I17.62 I 8.60 I10.50 S2.75 I 2.53 I 6.49 I23.50 I30.56 I25.54 S3.71 I21.56 I28.56 I27.50 I15 S4.75 I 4.56 I26.68 I 3.44 I 5.60 I24 S5.71 I13.57 I14.52 I22.52 FACESFamily Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale acronbach s alpha S1emotional bonding, S2acceptability and sharing, S3participation, S4negotiation and satisfaction, S5responsibility and expectation 1) 정서적유대 (emotional bonding) 2) 수용과공유 (acceptability and sharing) 3) 참여 (participation) 4) 타협과만족 (negotiation and satisfaction) 5) 책임과기대 (responsibility and expectation) 2. 문항-전체상관 (Corrected item-total correlation) 과내적일치도 (Internal consistency) 3. 변별타당도 1) 신뢰도 2) 하위척도들에대한집단간차이검증 1250

1251 130 129 128 127.43 126.52 125.52.41.44 124.10.36 123.07.41.20.14 122 2.1.19.47 121.55.46.45.52 120.45.12.20 119.10.08.17.16.20 118.40.45.44 117.16.47.48.58.36.46 116.41.17.14 115.09.04.11.19 114.11.49.16.14.41.10.15 113.47.48.17.11.19 112.19.16.14.36 111.40.09.44.15.50.45.41.16 110.17.40.16.14.36.36 19.16.09.11.01.09.08.17.01.00.10.02.08.02.10.10.13 18.20.16.51.41.58.43 17.54.41.53.48.59.40.44 16.16.16.08.45.17 15.43.46.44.20.45.40.49.17.63.36.50 14.47.01.14.16.19.07.09.12.10.51 13.14.08.09.15.11.19.15.13.40.09.08 12.19.48.45.44.06.04.43.06.17.08.43.46 11.48.58.16.40.49.20.49.43 Table 3. Correlation matrix among K-FACES II items 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 K-FACESKorean version of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale

Table 4. Correlation coefficients of subscales of K-FACES II according to variables S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Age.19** ** ** **.12 Education ** ** ** ** ** K-FACESKorean version of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale S1emotional bonding, S2acceptability and sharing, S3participation, S4negotiation and satisfaction, S5responsibility and expectation **p0.01 Table 5. The comparison of the mean and reliabilitycronbach s alpha of subscales of K-FACES II among 2 groups Control Patient Subscale F1,118 P MeanSD Adj. Mean MeanSD Adj. Mean S1 23.723 23.62.81 203.63 20.41.78 25.98.001 S2 18.903.04 18.64.71 15.153.64 15.41.71 28.75.001 S3 15.692 15.65.75 12.162 12.20.73 67.001 S4 18.403 18.19.74 152.75 15.57.76 20.001 S5 11.811.87 11.64.70 11.112 11.68.92 0 K-FACESKorean version of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale acronbach s alpha 1 patientn62family group with schizophrenic patient controln60members of normal families S1emotional bonding, S2acceptability and sharing, S3participation, S4negotiation and satisfaction, S5responsibility and expectation 고찰 1252

1253

참고문헌 1) Goldenberg I, Goldenberg H(1991):Family ther- 1254

apy;an Overview. 3rd ed, California, Brooks/Core, pp3-12 2) 배성일, 임효덕, 김영환 (1990): 정신과환자가족의스트레스지각및대응전략. 신경정신의학 24:421-430 3) 이선이 (1995) : 가족의위기. 여성한국사회연구회 (1995): 가족과한국사회. 서울, 경문사, pp341-346 4) Rolland JS, Walsh F(1994):Family Therapy. In: Textbook of Psychiatry. 2nd ed, Ed by Hales RE and Yudofsky SC and Talbott JA, Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press, pp1177-1185 5) Olson DH, Sprenkle DH, Russel CS(1979):Circumplex model of marital and family systems:cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Fam Process 18:3-28 6) Olson DH(1988):The Circumplex Model. New York, Haworth Press 7) Parker G, Johnston P, Hayward L(1988):Parental expressed emotion as a predictor of schizophrenic relapse. Arch Gen Psychiatry 45:806-813 8) Kantor D, Lehr W(1975):Inside the family. In: Family therapy;an Overview. 3rd ed, Ed by Goldenberg I and Goldenberg H(1991), California, Brooks /Core, pp267-268 9) Olson DH(1982):FACES II;Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. Family Social Science, Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press 10) Reiss D(1981):The family's construction of reality. In:Family therapy;an Overview. 3rd ed, Ed by Goldenberg I and Goldenberg H(1991), California, Brooks/Core, pp269-271 11) Beavers WR(1981):A systems model of family for family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 7:229-307 12) Epstein N, Bishop DS, Baldwin LM(1982):Mc- Master model of family functioning;a view of the normal family. In:Family therapy;an Overview. 3rd ed, Ed by Goldenberg I and Goldenberg H(1991), California, Brooks/Core, pp275 13) Moos RH(1974):Combind preliminary manual; Family, work, and group environment scales. In:Family therapy;an Overview. 3rd ed, Ed by Goldenberg I and Goldenberg H(1991), California, Brooks/Core, pp276-277 14) 오석환 (1963): 정신분열증환자의가정배경에관한고찰. 부산의대잡지 3:183-189 15) 강석헌 (1970): 정신분열증의가족에관한연구. 경북의대잡지부록 1:127-140 16) 고천석, 이형영 (1985): 정신과환자가족의불안에관한연구. 신경정신의학 24:88-93 17) 이정식, 김광일 (1991): 정신병환자가족의걱정에관한조사. 신경정신의학 30:517-531 18) American Psychiatric Association(1994):Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder. 4th ed, Washington DC, American Psychiatric Association 19) Goldenberg I, Goldenberg H(1991):Family therapy:an Overview. 3rd ed, California, Brooks/Core, pp33-49 20) 김용식 (1974): 청소년정신분열증성격장애자및정상대조군의가족관계에관한비교고찰. 신경정신의학 12:446-453 21) Anthony EJ(1970):The impact of mental and physical illness on family life. Am J Psychiatry 127: 138-146 22) Gibbons JS, Horn SH, Powell JM, Gibbons JL (1984):Schizophrenic patients and their families: Survey in a psychiatry service based on DGH unit. Br J Psychiatry 144:70-77 23) Cobb S(1976):Social support as a modulator of life stress. Psychom Med 38:300-314 24) 홍순원, 이병욱, 이수일 (1994): 정신병환자가족의심리적반응과대응전략에관한연구. 신경정신의학 33:117-128 25) 이효재 (1985): 분단시대의사회학. 여성한국사회연구회ᄑ1995): 한국가족문화의오늘과내일. 서울, 사회문화연구소출판부, pp23-55 26) 손승영 (1995): 한국사회의변화와가족. 여성한국사회연구회 (1995): 한국가족문화의오늘과내일. 서울, 사회문화연구소출판부, pp23-55 27) Barnes H, Olson DH(1985):Parent adolescent communication and the Circumplex Model. Child Development 56:438-447 28) Beavers WR, Voeller MN(1983):Comparing and contrasting the Olson Circumplex Model with the Beavers Systems Model. Family Precess 24:250-260 1255

ABSTRACT J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 37, No 6, November, 1998 A Preliminary Study on the Standardization of Korean Version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale II-a Reliability and Validity Jong-Il Lee, M.D., Deock-Kyu Seong, M.D., Min-Kyu Rhee, M.D. Department of General Psychiatry, Seoul National Mental Hospital, Seoul ObjectivesFamily environment is important in treatment, course, relapse, and prognosis of psychiatric illnesses. Thus the evaluation of family structure and the family therapy is important in the investigation and treatment of psychopathology. This preliminary study was designed to attempt to verify the reliability and validity of a Korean version of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale IIK-FACES II which evaluate the adaptability and cohesion of family structures. MethodThe translated FACES II which constructed a questionnaire composed of a total of 30 items was applied to 124 members from families with no psychiatric patient in Seoul and Pusan by random sampling. Then the authors extracted the factors which were able to compose the scale and evaluated the concurrent reliability. Also for the discriminative validity test, the authors selected 62 members, who have been no psychiatric history, of families with schizophrenic patient diagnosed with the criteria of DSM-IV who have been treated in Seoul National Mental Hospital and 60 members of families without schizophrenic patient in Seoul and Pusan for control. ResultThe results were as followsthe authors extracted 5 subscales of emotional bonding, acceptability and sharing, participation, negotiation and satisfaction, responsibility and expectation of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scalewhich constructed a questionnaire composed of a total of 23 items. Cronbach s alpha value of each subscale which show its internal consistency was.83,.75,.71,.75,.71 respectively. In the discriminative validity test, all subscales except responsibility and expectationsubscale significantly discriminated between family group with schizophrenic patient and control group. ConclusionThese findings confirmed the high reliability and validity of preliminary form of K- FACES II and suggest the possibility that K-FACES II could be a useful measure to evaluate the adaptability and cohesion of family structures. But we think that further study should be needed considering some limitations that 7 items were excluded and extracted factors could not be matched with FACES in factor analysis. KEY WORDSFamily structure FACES Reliability Validity Schizophrenia. 1256

부 록 1257

1258

1259