Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

12이문규

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

<B1A4B0EDC8ABBAB8C7D0BAB8392D345F33C2F75F E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The obje

서론

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Rheu-suppl hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H


ePapyrus PDF Document

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

1..

서론 34 2

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

11¹ÚÇý·É

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff


Output file

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: Exploring Education

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree


27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability


레이아웃 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

歯1.PDF

untitled

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * The Meaning of Pl

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Basic Study on t

YI Ggodme : The Lives and Diseases of Females during the Latter Half of the Joseon Dynasty as Reconstructed with Cases in Yeoksi Manpil (Stray Notes w

<C0CEBCE2BFEB5FBFACB1B85F D32322D3528BAAFBCF6C1A4295F FBCF6C1A42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe



06_ÀÌÀçÈÆ¿Ü0926

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

<C7D1B9CEC1B7BEEEB9AEC7D03631C1FD28C3D6C1BE292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

<B3EDB9AEC1FD5F3235C1FD2E687770>

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

<28BCF6BDC D B0E6B1E2B5B520C1F6BFAABAB020BFA9BCBAC0CFC0DAB8AE20C1A4C3A520C3DFC1F8C0FCB7AB5FC3D6C1BE E E687770>

대한한의학원전학회지26권4호-교정본(1125).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

사회동향1-최종

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


012임수진

Output file

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

민속지_이건욱T 최종

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<332EC0E5B3B2B0E62E687770>

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.295-318 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.4.201812.295 * A Research Trend on the Studies related to Parents of Adults with Disabilities Purpose: The purpose of this study was to contribute to the research on parents of adults with disabilities by analyzing the research trends of parents of adults with disabilities, who are playing a unique parent role according to their child's disability and life cycle, and the parent-related variables in these studies. Method: We selected papers dealing with topics related to parents of adults with disabilities through keyword search and review of references, and then added some papers through searching contents of the journals containing two or more selected papers. Finally a total of 64 papers were confirmed as subjects of this analysis. Research trends were analyzed according to relevant variables such as year of publication, field of academic research, research methods, and research topics. In addition to that, the parents-related variables such as parent characteristics, their child s disability type and age, and the roles of parents in the studies were reviewed. Results: The number of domestic academic papers for parents of adults with disabilities has increased since 2010. Most of the papers were published in the field of education, especially in the journals of special education. Survey researches were the most common. In the social welfare and social science fields, there were many papers related to parents' related topics, while there were many papers related to their children with disabilities in the education field. In terms of research topics, a large number of studies about the demands of supports were implemented in both topics related to parents and topics on their children with disabilities. The results of the analysis of the parent-related variables showed that there were many papers on both mothers and fathers. In the studies, most of their children with disabilities were in their twenties. The advocacy and spokesperson for children with disabilities were the most common roles of their parents. Discussion & Conclusion: The research on the parents of adults with disabilities tends to be biased by each research field, so it is necessary to try various research topics such as father-directed research. Key words : Adults with Disabilities, Parents, Research Trends, Parental Role * 2015 (NRF-2015S1A5A2A03048176). Corresponding Author: Lee, Soojeoung. Uiduk University, Div. of Special Education, Donghaedaero 261, Gangdongmyeon, Gyeongju, Gyeongsangbukdo, Korea, e-mail: soojeong@uu.ac.kr

I.,.,,, (,,, 2017), (,, 2013)...., (parenting) (, 2011;, 2014)..., (, 2015;, 2014; Gray, 2006; Mu, 2006).,,, (,, 2009), (social parenting) (, 2012). (, 2017;,, 2016;,,, 2016) (,, 2015), (,, 2016;, 2015)., 2010 (,, 2013).,,. (,,, 2017;,, 2013;,, 2012). (Sematic Network Analysis),, (2017),,

.,, (,,, 2017)., (, 2015)., (Wilkler, 1981).,,...,?,?..,., ( :,,, 2015) ( :, 2016).., KISS( ) DBpia( ), ( ), e-article( ), RISS( ) 1. 1 43. 17., 2

., :,,,,,,,,,,,, 14 4. 64. 1) 2).,,,,. 2018. (, /, /, ),,,. (,, ),,,,., (, ),.,,,, 5... < -1>.

: : (,, ), (, ), (, ), (,,, ) :,,,,, : * (,,, ), ** (,,,, ) :,,, : (,,,, ), (20,,, ), :,,,, * : ** :. 30.8% 20. / ( + ) 100 96.4%..,,. 64 < -1>.

() 1 (1998) - 2 (1999) - 3 (2000) - 4 (2001) 5 (2001) -,, 6 - (2002) 7 (2002) - : 8 (2004) - (. 9, (2005) - ) 10 (2006) - 11, (2008) - 12, (2008) - 13 (2008a) ( ) - 14 (2008b) -,, 15 - (2010) 16, (2010) 17, (2010) - 18 (2010) ( ) - 19 (2011a) - 20 (2011b) - 21 (2011c) - 22, (2011) 23 (2012) -,, 24 - (2012),, 25 -, (2012) 26 (2013) - 27, (2013) -,, 28 -, (2013) 29, (2013) - 30, (2013) - 31, (2014) - 32, (2014) -,, 33 -, (2014) 34, (2014) - 35, (2014) -

( ) () 36, (2015) - : 37, (2015) -,, 38 - (2015) : 39 (2015) -,, 40 - (2015) 41, (2015) - 42 (2015) - 43, (2015) - 44 (2015) - 45, (2015) -,, 46 (2015) 47, (2016) - 48, (2016) -,, 49 - (2016),, 50 - (2016) 51, (2016) - 52, (2016) - 53, (2016),, 54 - (2016) 55, (2016) ( ) 56 (2017) - 57, (2017) - 58, (2017),, : 59 - (2017),, 60,, - (2017),, 61 - (2017),, 62 - (2018),, 63 -, (2018) 64, (2018) - < -1>.

< -1> 1998 2010 2008 0-2 2010 3-5 2015 11. 2016 9, 2017 6. < -2>. 40.6%( 26 ) (21, 32.8%), (12, 18.8%), (5, 7.8%). 23 (35.9%) 14 (21.9%), 7 (10.9%).,, 1 2. (%) 1 (1.6) 2 23 14 7 5 7 1 1 1 2 (3.1) (35.9) (21.9) (10.9) (7.8) (10.9) (1.6) (1.6) (1.6) (3.1) 26(40.6) 21(32.8) 12(18.8) 5(7.8) 64 (100.0) < -2>. < -2> 2010. 2016 2017. 2001 1 2010 1.

,, < -3> 2010.

< -2>. < -2> 29 (45.3%) 24 (37.5%), 5 (7.8%), 3 (4.7%), 2 (3.1%), 1 (1.6%). 13 11. 5 6 4. 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (3.1) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 0 9 8 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 (0.0) (0.0) (14.1) (12.5) (4.7) (4.7) (3.1) (1.6) (1.6) (1.6) (1.6) 0 1 12 4 1 1 4 0 0 0 1 (0.0) (1.6) (18.8) (6.3) (1.6) (1.6) (6.3) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (1.6) 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 (1.6) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (3.1) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) * 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (%) 1(1.6) 2(3.1) 23(35.9) 14(21.9) 7(10.9) 5(7.8) 7(10.9) 1(1.6) 1(1.6) 1(1.6) 2(3.1) * (%) 3 (4.7) 29 (45.3) 24 (37.5) 2 (3.1) 5 (7.8) 1 (1.6) 64 (100.0) < -3>. < -3> 26(40.6%), 38 (59.4%). 20, 6 17, 4, 10, 2, 5. ( 18 ) 13..

1 1 18 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 (1.6) (1.6) (28.1) (1.6) (4.7) (0.0) (3.1) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 (0.0) 20(31.3) 4(6.3) 2(3.1) 0(0.0) 1 (1.6) 5 (7.8) 13 (20.3) 4 (6.3) 5 (7.8) 5 (7.8) 1 (1.6) 1 (1.6) 6(9.4) 17(26.6) 10(15.6) 5(7.8) 1 (1.6) 0 (0.0) 26 (40.6) 2 (3.1) 38 (59.4) (%) 64 (100.0) < -4> < -5>. 26 18 69.2%. 3 (11.5%), 2 (7.7%). 5 (19.2%) 4 (15.4%), 3 (11.5%), 2 (7.7%). 2 1 (,,, 2018) (,, 2014).,,.,. 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (19.2) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (3.8) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (11.5) (3.8) (3.8) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (15.4) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (3.8) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (7.7) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (%) 6 (23.1) 5 (19.2) 5 (19.2) 2 (7.7) 18 (69.2)

( ) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.8) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.8) 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (11.5) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (7.7) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3.8) (3.8) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 1 18 1 2 0 2 00 0 0 0 (3.8) (69.2) (3.8) (7.7) (0.0) (7.7) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (%) 3 (11.5) 3 (11.5) 2 (7.7) 26 (100.0) < -5>. 38 18 47.4%. 13 (34.2%) 4 (10.5%), 1 (2.6%). 6 (15.8%), 5 (13.2%), 4 (10.5%).,,,,,,.,. 0 0 0 5 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (13.2) (5.3) (5.3) (5.3) (2.6) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0) 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (5.3) (0.0) (5.3) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (5.3) (2.6) (0.0) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 (0.0) (0.0) (2.6) (5.3) (0.0) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (2.6) (2.6) (%) 13 (34.2) 4 18 (10.5) (47.4) 1 (2.6) 4 (10.5) 6 (15.8)

( ) 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (7.9) (0.0) (2.6) (0.0) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 (0.0) (2.6) (2.6) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (2.6) 0 1 5 13 4 5 5 1 1 1 2 (0.0) (2.6) (13.2) (34.2) (10.5) (13.2) (13.2) (2.6) (2.6) (2.6) (5.3) (%) 5 (13.2) 5 (13.2) 38 (100.0),,. < -6>. < -6> 34 (53.1%) 24 (37.5%). 5 (7.8%). * (%) 0(0.0) 24(37.5) 34(53.1) 5(7.8) 64(100.0) *, < -7>. < -7> 58 28 (43.8%) 19 (29.7%), 5 (7.8%). 3 (4.7%).

* ** *** **** (%) 19(29.7) 5(7.8) 28(43.8) 3(4.7) 3(4.7) 5(7.8) 64(100.0) * ** ( :,, ) *** ****, < -8>. < -8> 20 21 (32.8%) 2-30 19-50 11 (17.2%). 15 (23.4%). 20 * ** *** 21(32.8) 11(17.2) 0(0.0) 11(17.2) 15(23.4) 5(7.8) 64(100.0) * : (20-30 ), (40-50 ), (19-50 ) ** 19 ***, < -9>. 64 ( :, ) 28 (43.8%) ( : ) 18 (28.1%), ( : ) 10 (15.6%). ( :, ) 16 (25.0%), ( : ) 6 (9.4%), 2 (3.1%). 1 (,,, 2017) 1 (,,, 2012).,,,,,,,

.,,,. 1 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 (1.6) (0.0) (6.3) (0.0) (3.1) (0.0) (3.1) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (1.6) 0 0 0 9 1 3 2 1 1 0 1 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (14.1) (1.6) (4.7) (3.1) (1.6) (1.6) (0.0) (1.6) 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (4.7) (1.6) (1.6) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 0 1 19 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 0 (0.0) (1.6) (29.7) (3.1) (3.1) (1.6) (3.1) (0.0) (0.0) (1.6) (0.0) 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0.0) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (1.6) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) 1 2 22 14 7 5 7 1 1 1 2 (1.6) (3.1) (34.4) (21.9) (10.9) (7.8) (10.9) (1.6) (1.6) (1.6) (3.1) (%) 10(15.6) 18(28.1) 6(9.4) 28(43.8) 2(3.1) 64 (100.0)... 64 2010,.... 20..., 2010 2015 11 2016

. 2016, (2017). 2015 (2014) 2016. 2015..,,,,...., (,, 2017). (, 2011;, 2012;,,, 2017). (, 2015) (,, 2011) (,,, 2017)....,,,.,, 20 30~50..,

. (,, 2013;, 2013) (,,,, 2012). (,, 2010) (, 2011a;, 2010).,..,,,., 37.5%. 1. (,, 2013;, 2012) (,, 2012;,, 2010)..,,,.. -,,..

, (2017).. (1), 199-222. (2011).. 237-259.,, (2012).. 171-189., (2009).. (2), 199-223. (2016).. (4), 1-25., (2013).. (1), 71-101.,, (2017).. (3), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2017.23.3.75 (2017).. (2), 51-76. (2011). : (3), 471-484.., (2013).. (3), 333-356. (2015). :. (2), 463-490., (2012).. (3), 279-295., (2013).. (3), 381-407. (2014). :. (1), 1-21.,,, (2012).. (2), 141-175. (2012). :. (2014).. (1), 87-120. (2013).. (2), 1-24., (2010)..

(4), 439-447., (2016).. (1), 43-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.16884/jrr.2016.20.1.43,, (2015).. (2), 169-186., (2012). ADHD. (3), 219-239., (2015).. (10), 349-366. (2015). - -. 5-27., (2017).. (4), 61-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.16884/jrr.2016.20.1.43, (2016).. (6), 334-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.16884/jrr.2016.20.1.43, (2011).. 27-49.,, (2016).. 261-304., (2010).,,. (2), 85-104. (2012). :., (2014). :. (3), 69-92. (2010).. (2), 243-263.,, (2017). :. (4). 75-104. https://doi.org/ 10.26857/JLLS.2017.11.13.4.75 Gray, D. E. (2006). Coping over time: the parents of children with autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(12), 970-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00933.x Mu, P. F. (2006). Transition experience of parents caring of children with epilepsy: A phenomenological study, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 543-551. Wikler, L. (1981). Chronic stresses of families of mentally retarded children. Family Relations, 30(2), 281-288.

<> (2012).. (2), 1-21. (2011a).. 237-259. (2011b).., 39-63. (2011c).., 369-390.,, (2012).. 171-189., (2015). :., 99-118. (2004). : 1980. (4), 271-296., (2015).. (4), 315-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.19049.jsped.2015.16.4.13, (2016).. (1), 35-56., (2016).. (4), 79-100.,, (2015).. (1), 125-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.16884/jrr.2015.19.1.125 (2015). ( ). (3), 83-108. (2017).. (2), 51-76.,, (2010).. (4), 1213-1223., (2008).. (4), 245-276., (2017).. (1), 91-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.20971/kcpmd.2017.60.1.91,, (2002)..

(1), 177-198. (2002).. 133-144.,, (2015).. (3), 127-150., (2011).. (1), 25-35., (2005).. (1), 17-31.,,, (2012).. (2), 141-175., (2008).. (4), 213-244. (2000).., 106-130. (2001). :. (3), 443-451., (2010).. (4), 439-447.,, (2016).. (3), 225-249. (2013).., 1-23., (2013).., 307-327., (2016).. (1), 43-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.16884/jrr.2016.20.1.43 (1998).. 59-84. (1999).. 165-195. (2001). :. 59-88., (2010).. (4), 247-276., (2015).. 29-48.,, (2016). (1),

. (1), 129-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.15861/kjse.2016.51. 1.129 (2015).. (2), 147-177., (2016).. (1), 133-150., (2014). : Q. 143-166., (2012). ADHD. (3), 219-239., (2015).. (10), 349-366. (2015). - -. 5-27.,,, (2013). :. (3), 175-205.,, (2018).. (2), 45-78. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.20971/kcpmd.2018.61.2.45, (2016).. (6), 334-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.16884/jrr.2016.20.1.43, (2014).. (1), 53-78., (2017). :,. (4), 27-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.21321 /jfr.21.4.27,, (2016). :,,. 217-244., (2013).. (3), 263-285., (2015). :. (3), 227-252.,,, (2018).. (1), 333-359. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.21024/pnuedi.28.1.201803.333

,, (2017).. (4), 289-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.19049/ JSPED.2017.18.4.12, (2018).. 81-112.,, (2016).. 261-304., (2013).. 287-316. (3),,,, (2014).. (1), 245-281., (2014). :. (1), 215-239. (2006). :. 5-42.,,,, (2017).. 103-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.15300/ jcw.2017.61.2.103, (2014). :. (3), 69-92. (2008a).,. (1), 89-112. (2008b).. (1), 151-167. (2010).. (2), 243-263.,, (2017). :. (4). 75-104. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.26857JLLS.2017.11.13.4.75, (2016).. (2), 191-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.15820/khjss.2016.42.2.009 : 2018.11.07. / : 2018.11.12. / : 2018.12.20.

:. : 2 64.,,,,,. : 2010,.... 20.. :.