Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.341-366 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.4.201812.341 Exploring Educational Implications through an Analysis of Research Trend on Post-human and Education Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the post - human research trends in the field of education and explore implications for education. Method: To do this, a total of 14 papers with 'Post Human' and 'Education' as main keywords were selected for analysis using the online database provided by RISS and KERIS. As a result of the analysis, post - human and education - related researches have started to be done relatively recently with the papers published within the last 3 years. Results: Thus, in most cases, 'literature study' was conducted to examine theoretical considerations of Post Human and the possibility of applying them to education. Also, the most of researches was made in the field of art education including art and music. The purpose and contents of the study were divided into research that explores the educational direction of post - human era, research that develops curriculum, or suggests educational methods. In the field of education, studeies based on post-human perspective seem to have started very recently. Recent studies showed us that we need to take post-human perspective seriously when we apply it to physical education, art education and life-long education. Particulary, there were critical implications for art education. It plays an emphasis on generative and emergent art curriculum based on aesthetic and affective competencies. Conclusion: Finally, we concluded that there is a need to change our perspective on students from fixed identity as learners to moving and affective material as post-human subjectivity. Key words : posthuman, education, research trend Corresponding Author: Lee, Youn-sun. Pusan National University, Dept. of Early Childhood Education, Busandaehakro, Jangjeondong, Busan, Korea, e-mail: ozzy1002@daum.net
. (Braidotti, 2015: 8).,.,. Hayles(2013),.. -(post-human),, (Hayles, 2013).,,,,., (Best & Kellner, 2001; Braidotti, 2015). (, 2015).,,.. -, (Braidotti, 2015; Habermas, 2003)., (Ettinger, 2011)., (Fukuyama, 2002). Braidotti(2015)
,.., (Hayles, 2013).,,,.,....., (,, 2017), (, 2017). (,,, 2017)., (, 2016).,,.,., (,, 2017)., SF,, (, 2017;, 2017;,,, 2017;, 2017;,, 2017),
,.,,.,.,. (Murris, 2016).. (,, 2009).,,. (,,, 2017),,,,,..,,,.. 1.? 1-1.,,? 1-2.?
., (KERIS: Korea Education and Research Information Service) (RISS: Research Information Service System),., 5 31, 2., 1.,.,,. 4. (2018 6 ) 4, 18.,, 2015 2018 4, 4. 18,.. No 1 2 ( ),, 2017 2017 (keywords) instrumental knowledge, Pansophia, post human, wisdom education, convergence,,,
( ) No 3 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SF (AI) (spirituality)? -,,,, (keywords),,, 2016,, 2018, 2017,, 4, 2017 2017, SF,,, -,,,,,,,,,, 2018,,,,, 2017 2017 2016 13 2018, 14 15 (II) :,, SF',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 4,,,, 2017 2015,,,,, SF,,,,, -,,, -,,,,,
( ) No (keywords) 16 4 4,,, 2017, 17,,, 2017, 18 (inhuman) (nonhuman) Jagodzinsk, 2017,,,,.,,, (,, ).,.,, (,,,, 2018).,.,,., 18,,.,., 1-1,,.,. 2015
2018 6 3 6,.,.,,,, ( ).,, Creswell(2014, 2017),,., 1-2,.,. ~..,,.,, 3,. 3,.,.,...,,,.
18 2015 6 1 (7.1%), 2016 2 (14.3%), 2017 12 (66.7%), 2018 6 3 (16.7%). 4,.,, 2002 300 (,,,, 2018),. 2015 2016 3 2017 12 6,.,,., 15 (83.3%), 2 (11.1%), 1 (5.6%).,., 3. 2 1 1, 1 (5.6%).,.
2015 2016 2017 2018(~6 ) (%) 1 2 9 3 15(83.3%) - - 2-2(11.1%) - - 1-1(5.6%) (%) 1(5.6%) 2(11.1%) 12(66.7%) 3(16.7%) 18(100.0%),,,, 18 9 (50.0%)., 4 (22.2%),, 2 (14.3%). 2 (14.3%), 1 (7.1%).,.,,,., (, 2017).,. (%) SF 2 (11.1%) 3 (16.7%) 1(5.6%) 9 (50.0%)
( ) (%) (inhuman) (nonhuman) (AI) (spirituality)? 3 (16.7%) 4 2 (11.1%) 1(5.6%) 1(5.6%) (II):,, SF',,, 1(5.6%) 9 (50.0%) 4 (22.2%) 1(5.6%) 2 (11.1%) ( ) 2 (11.1%) ( ) 1 (5.6%) 2 (11.1%) 1 (5.6%)., ~. ~.., (1), (2)., 12, 6.. 1) 포스트휴먼시대교육의방향탐색 18 12,.,,
.,.. No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (II) :,, SF',, 21,.,.,. SF SF,,.,, ( ),,.,.,,.
( ) No 8 9 10 4 4,,, 4,., (inhuman) 21 (nonhuman). -,. 11,,. 12 (AI) (spirituality)?,.,.,.,,,,,,.,, (2017).,.,,,,. (2016).,
,,., () ().,.,,,,.,, (2017) SF., (2016).,.,. (2017)..,,. (2017).. -,.,.
, (2015),,, SF,., 21.,.,,, (2016).,,.,,,,,.,.,,,, (2017) SF. SF,,.,.., Jagodzinsk (2017), Deleuze Guattari () ( ).,
,,., (2018) (spirituality).., (2017),,.,,.,., (2017). 4,.,,.,,,.,,.,.,,.
2) 교육과정의개발및방법론적제안, 6.,,.,.,.. No 1 2 3 4 5-6,,,.,.,,,.,,,. The Readers,. 4,,.
, (2017),.,,.,.. (2017),.,.,,.,,..,,.,.,., (, 2018),,
.,, (2017).,., <A. I.>, < >,,,,,..,,, (2017)., Michel Ocelot < (Les Trois Inventeurs)>.,,.,.,. (2017).,. Leonardo da Vinci, < >,.,,, -,.,,
.,....,,,.,, 18 3 6 12 (66.7%) 2017, 15 (83.3%)., 9 (50.0%).,, 12, 6.,.,,..,.,.
.., 18 3 1 6..,.,,.,.,. (50.0%),,, (,, 2017;, 2017).,,.,. (Olsson, 2016).,. Tyler.,.,,, (Taguchi, 2018),.,,
.,,,,,,,,,..,,,.,, (,, 2016).,,.,,,,., (Murris, 2016), (Taguchi, 2018)..,...,..,, Piaget.
.,. 4.,,,,,..,,,,.,.,..,,, (2018). :. (3), 399-421. (2017). ( ). 1-36.,, (2017).. (4), 479-499. (2017).,,. (4), 73-87. (2017).,. 34-61. (2017).. 53-80.,, (2018).. (1),
417-435., (2016).. (6), 349-374.,, (2017).., 157-188., (2018).. (6), 829-847., (2017).. (2), 179-216. (2017). SF. 45-68. (2017).. 153-176. (2018). (AI) (spirituality)? :. 217-243., (2009).. (3), 293-314.,, (2017). -. 267-297. (2017).. (2), 127-152. (2016).. 83-111. (2018).. (8), 1-22., (2017).. (6), 191-215. (2015). (II) :,, SF ',. 465-505. Jagodzinsk, J., (2017). (inhuman) (nonhuman). (2), 41-55., (2016). (keyword network). (2), 81-94. (2015). :. (2017). 4. (2), 53-89. (2017). :. (5), 69-89. (2017).. (1), 1-26.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman.., (2015) :. Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2001). The postmodern adventure: Science, technology, and cultural studies at the third millennium. New York: Guilford Press. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches..,,,,,,,,, (2017). :. Ettinger, R. (1962). The Prospect of Immortality.., (2011). :. Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press. Halberstam, J., & Livingston, I. (1995). Posthuman bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women : the reinvention of nature.., (2002). :. Hayles, K. N. (1999). How we became posthuman : virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics.., (2013). : :. Herbrechter, S. (2009). Posthumanismus..,, (2012). :. Jaques, Z. (2015). Children's literature and the posthuman: animal, environment, cyborg. New York : London : Routledge. Murris, K. (2016). The Posthuman Child: Educational Transformation through Philosophy with Picturebooks. Contesting Early Childhood Series (eds G. Dahlberg and P. Moss). London: Routledge. Olsson, L. M. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education..,,,, (2016). :. Taguchi, H. L. (2010). Going beyong the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy..,,,,,,,,, (2018). :. : 2018.10.15. / : 2018.11.12. / : 2018.12.20.
:,. :, (KERIS) (RISS) 18. :,,,,.,.,.,. :.