,,,, : 1995 : : : :. 1950, 60,,, (, 1985). 1970, (Nanette Silv a, 1994). 1983 6 5 (1987). 1989, 1993, 1995 (,1995)., 1985.,,. (1994) 40%, (1988) 60%, 28.5%, 22%.,,,,,,,,,,, (Hiberm an, 1980).
(W etzel, L. & Ross M. A, 1983),,, (, 1987).,,. 80 5.5 3. 30%, 18%, 70% (1996, ). 1987 60,000 100,000 1 1 8 300 (, 1990).,,,., (, 1995), 1972 24.4, 1.2, 4.9% 1992 41.8, 5.7, 13.7% 20 2.5 3.,.,, (1985),,,,,.,,,,,,.,,.,,.,,,.,,,.,,,,, (empow erm ent ).. 1.
1) Scott (1974),,,,,,,. Strau s(1974) CRT (Conflict Resolution T echnique Scales )., K, : L, : M, : N, : O, : P, : Q,. 2),,,,. T och (1969),, (self- indulgent compen sat or ), (self- defender ). W alker (1979)..,. 80%.. (appthy ),,,. W alker (1979),,,,. (Attribution ),,,,,. T V,,,, (, ) (Compell & Landenburger, 1995 : 1993 :, 1987 :, 1993).
3).,,, (Scott, 1974).,,, (, 1984 ; Scott, 1974 : Roun saville, 1978). Hilberm an (1980) 50%, 2 0 50%. McClintock (1963) 30% 90%. Strau s(1978) CRT Scale N - R 1 1-2 3.8%. 40% (, 1984 :, 1984), 708 14% (, 1984). 60%, 28.5%, 22% (, 1988). 20-25%, 20-30%, 2-3% 50%, 80-90%, (, 1984 :, 1984 :, 1985 : Roun saville, 1978).,,,,,, (Scott, 1974),,, (, 1984 ; S cott, 1974)..,,, (, 1984 :, 1985).,,. Snell (1964). (1988) (38.3% ), (18.3% ), (10% ), (8.3% ), (6.7% ), (5.0% ), (5.0% ), (4.2% ), (1.7% ), (0.8% ), (0.8% ). (1985). (1994),,,,
,,,,,,,, ( :,,,, ),, ( ),,. Roun saville(1978) 45%,,, 16%. Roun saville(1978) (, 1984 :, 1985).,,,,, (, 1985). (1988) (57.5% ), (32.7% ), (8% ), (1.8% ). 1 60 88%, 5 92% (, 1984 :, 1985).. 1 5%, 2 5%, 3 6%, 3 5 13%, 15 20 12%, 20 10% (, 1984). (1984). 5 15. (1988) 5 15 (25.6% ), 6 (16.6% ), 2 5 (15.4% ), 3 (14.1% ), 1 (10.3% ), (10.3% ), 15 (7.7% ). 4) 20 20%, 30 50%, 40 25%, 50 4%, 30 (, 1984 : 1984 : Hilberm an, 1978 : Roun saville, 1978). (1988) 20 (15% ), 30 (38% ), 40 (41.5% ), 50 (15.0% ), 60 (1.0% ). 20 40.. 15%, 10%, 43%, 39% (, 1984 :, 1984 :, 1985 : Roun saville, 1978). (1988) (7% ), (19.5% ), (48.5% ), (24.5% ), (0.5% ).
(, 1984).,. Roun saville(1978), (1985) 48%.,, (, 1985).. (1995) 92.8% 21.4%, 12.9%, 11.4%, 8.6%, 7.1%, 7.1%,,.,,,,,,, (, 1987). 90%,, 10%,, (, 1984 :, 1984)., (, 1985).,,,. (, 1987). 3.,., (, 1984 :, 1985).,. (, 1985), (, 1984).,,,
. (1988) (59.1% ), (31.3% ), (3.5% ), (2.0% ). (, 1985).,, (, 1987). 5) 1985 (, 1992) 1983. (1987) 1,2,3. 1,,,,.. 2 -. 3.. 2. 4. (, 1994)...,,. 24., Draker (1982) (Butler & Snodgrass, 1991)., (Brown, Carpio & Martin, 1982)
, (Delgaty, 1985). (Brown Carpio & Martin, 1982). 2. 1),,,,,,,,...,, (, 1996). 2),.,,,,, ( ),,, (,,,, ),, (, 1993).,,, (, 1989)...,.,. (, 1990). 3. 1.,,,,,... 2,
. 3...,,,.,.. (, 1989). (1989),. Groth 500,,, ( ) (F ortune, 1983 :, 1990 : ).,,. 3) (1991), 329 123 37.7%, 206 62.3%., 21.2% (69 ), 14.1% (46 ), 7.1% (23 ), 10.4% (34 ), 5.2% (17 ), 4.2% (14 ).. 1991 696 83.6%, 24.4%, 15.4%. 1991 4 1992 7 1,024 117 11% 97 (83% ), 20 (17% ).,,,. 1987 12 24%, 23% (92% ), (57% ), (9% ), 17%. (74.7% ), (28% ),
,..,. 10 14%. 40 50%. 1980 47,. 1990 10, (Campbell, 1995). 4).,. 1992 4 2,,,.,, (, 1993)...... (, 1995)..,,
,. 1994 4 1. 6 1.. (, 1995).,.,..,.,,. (, 1993). 3. 1),.,., (,1986). 2).., (, 1993).,
., (, 1993).,. Hom an s, Blu -, Levinger -, Scazoni. Yoder Nichols.....,.. Hill Burr., (, 1993).,,..,. (, 1993),. 3) (, 1975),. (, 1975). 1960,, (, 1986).
,,., (, 1987)., -,, -.,.,.,.. (, 1991).,... 4) 1992 1.31, 4.73, 2.88, 1.87 1.37, 0.45., 5 36.3%, 2 15% 5. 8.4, 9.1, 10.8, 11.6, 13.4, 16.9 (, 1994). 37, 33, 50.. 1972 94.1% 1992 91.1%,, 1972 3.0% 1982 3.2%., 1972 0.5% 1992 2.1% 4.. 1972 2.4% 1992 3.7%.,,,,,,,,,
(, 1995).,,, (, 1994). (25.2% ), (13.3% ), (6.1% ) (14.2% ), (11.9% ), (11.2% ), (9.5% ), (7.3% ), (6.5% ) (, 1994)...,.. (, 1994).,. 5).,,.,, (, 1993)..,.,,,.. 1989,., 1990..,.,,.. (, 1995)...,
(, 1988),.,.,.,..,,,,....,,. T V,,,,..,.,. 24.,,, srl., (empow erm ent ),,,,., (shelter ).,,.,..
.,..,..,.,,,,,,,. < > 1. (1993).,, 88-108. 2. (1994).,. 3. (1984). 1984, 1,,. 4. (1985). 50,, 232-256. 5. (1987).,, 6, 23-25. 6. (1991).,. 7. (1993).,. 8. (1984).,. 9. (1989).,. 10. (1995).,,, 34 (6), 1788-1803. 11. (1990).,. 12. (1990).,, 9. 1-13. 13. (1992).,. 14. (1990).,, 9. 14-25. 15. (1990).,, 9. 26-36. 16. (1996).,.
17. (1984). 1984, 1,,. 18. (1983).,,, 6, 1-10. 19. (1975).,. 20. (1995).,,, 12. 21. (1994).,. 22. (1989).,. 23. (1988).,, 17, 143-158. 24. (1987).,. 25. (1984)., 1,,. 26. (1988). :,. 27. (1986).,. 28. (1993).,,, 1993. 29. (1994).,, 11. 30. (1993).,, 8. 31. (1993).,,,. 32. (1992).,,, 17-33. 33. (1995).,, 19(3), 127-148. 34. (1986).,, (2). 35. (1987).,, 6, 11-22. 36. (1995).. 37. (1993)., : 3,. 38. (1994)., 5. 39. (1995).,. 40., (1993).,, 5, 144-160. 41. Brow n B, Carpio B & M artin D.S.,(1982). W ife Abu se ; An Old F am ily Problem, T he Can adian Nur se, 78 (6), 23-28. 42. Butler M.J & Snodgrass F.G,(1991) Bey ond A bu se, P ar se ' s T heory in practice, Nur sing S cience Quart erly, 4 (2), 76-82. 43. Cam pbell J.C. an d Lan denburger K., Violen ce again st W om en, F og el C.I. & W oods N.F.(1995). In W om en ' s Health Care, S age P ublication. 44. Degaty K.,(1985). Batt ered W om en ; T he Issu e for Nur sing, T he Canadian Nur se, 21-23. 45. Drake V.K.,(1982). Battered W om en ; A H ealth care problem in disguise, Im age, 14 (2), 40-47. 46. Hilberm an, E.,(1980). "T he W ife - b eat er ' s w ife", A.J.P sy chiat. 137, 1336-1347. 47. M cclintock F,(1963). Crim es of violence, N ew York, St. M artin ' s P ress.
48. Nan ett e Silv a, (1994). T ow ard a fem in st m ethodology in Research an Batt ered W om en in Dan. A.J. Refram ing w om en ' s health, S age P ublication. 49. Roun saville, B.J.,(1978). T he T heories in m arital violen ce ; Eviden ce from a stu dy of b att ered w om en, Victim ology, 3, 11-31. 50. S cott P.D.,(1974). Batt ered w iv es, Brit. J. P sy chiat, 125, 433-441. 51. Strau s M.A.,(1975). Lev elin g, civility and violen ce in th e fam ily, J. M arriage & F am ily, 36, 13-29. 52. T och H,(1969). Violent m en, Chicago, Aldin e. 53. W alker L.E,(1979). T he batt ered w om an, New York, Harper & Row. 54. W et zel L. & Ros s M.A,(1983). P sy chological an d leadin g to a coun sellin g m ethodology for victim s of dom estic. 55. Violen ce, (1983). J. P er son al & Guidance, 61, 423-428. - A b s t rac t - T he S tudy on W om an 's He alth Problem in the V iew of B attering, S ex u al V iolenc e and Div orce Euy S oon Choi Muyn g Suk Koh Eyu Eun H ee Suk Youn g Kil Euy S oon Choi : Colleg e of Nur sin g, Cath olic Univ er sity Muyng Suk Koh : Dept. of Nur sin g, S am yuk Univ er sity Eyu Eun H ee : Yeong Don g Junior Colleg e Suk Young Kil : Dept. of Nur sing, Korea Univ er sity T his paper review s battering, sexu al violen ce and div orce ex perien ced am ong w om en. T here three problem s hav e negativ e influence on h ealth st atu s in w om en an d are furth er dev eloped t o social problem s su ch as fam ily dissolution. T he victim s of the problem s m ay m anifest phy sical injury, em otion al difficulties an d social w ithdraw l, w hile th eir children m ay sh ow problem s cau sed by lack of parent al caring an d by resem blin g abu siv e behavior s of their parent s. H en ce, nur ses n eed to pay attention t o battin g, sex ual v iolen ce, and div orce an d t o dev elop relev ant nur sing int erv ention s for th em.
S om e strategies of dealing w ith those problem s are presented in the follow in g. F ir st, w e h av e t o elim inat e sex ism prev ailing in out society. Our society is as signin g inequ al and asym m etrical gen der role. M as s m edia sh ould in spire equality bet w een g en der s and show a healthy m odel of fam ily and com m unity. S econd, social sy st em and law s should be ch ang ed throu gh collectiv e effort s. T hose liv in g condition s of w om en cann ot be chang ed by the effort of w om en them s elv es only. W e all need to work for establishing and changing the law, so that those women in sufferin g can obtain im m ediate an d adequ at e protection. T hird, social support sy st em of con sultin g and referrin g w om en ' s problem s should b e est ablish ed. Such support sy stem a s hot lin e, sh elt er an d coun selin g clinics w ould h elp w om en in crisis. F ourth, job training and arrang em ent sh ould be av ailable t o w om en w ho are div orced. F ifth, there sh ould be self- help group for those w om en in sufferin g. S elf- help group w ould h elp those w om en in sharin g their problem s and feeling s and in establishing coping strategies. Nur ses, a s the largest group am on g h ealth professionals, are sen sitiv e and respon d t o h ealth needs of client s an d hav e an effect on m an aging w om en ' s health. H ow ev er, w e nur ses hav e not been ready for dealin g w ith problem s of w om en, alth ou gh m ost of u s are w om en. w e not n eed t o chan ge our per spectiv e of w om en ' s h ealth problem s from a traditional m edical per spectiv e t o fem inistic on e. A ccordingly, nur ses n eed t o dev elop realistic w ay of caring those w om en in sufferin g an d to as sist th em in m aking decision s for their lives by them selves.