ISSN 1229-0718 한국심리학회지발달 27 권 4 호 (2014 년 12 월 ) THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 목차 중년기성격과노화불안 : 성격 5요인, 생성감과노화불안의관계 김민희 신순옥중년기부부의배려정도와결혼만족도및삶의만족감과의관계 김승주 정영숙과거와미래사건의순서에대한추론의발달과집행기능 윤주인 박영신가리키기행동이해에기반을둔 12개월영아들의행동목표예측능력 김은영 송현주부모의공감적양육과청소년의공감이학교적응에미치는영향 최나래 신나나대학신입생의자기존중감, 자기자비와대처전략및대학생활적응의관계 정영숙 김수빈발달초기학습된단어의유지에있어타인간의사회적상호작용의역할 정은주 최영은 한국발달심리학회
한국심리학회지 : 발달
원고제출및작성요령 1. 한국심리학회지 : 발달,,. 2003 8 ( ). 2. e-mail (kjspp.editor@gmail.com).,,. 3.. 10, 95, -10, 160.. 1,800, 3,700 ( 500 ). 4..,. 5.,, ( ) 1. 6. 150 (600 ),. Psychological Abstracts APA. 7.. (figure graph). 8. ( : 1. ), ( : 1. ). ( : 1..., 1...). 9.. (1970) Köhler(1940) (1970) Köhler Wallach,, (1970) Wallach (1951) (, 1970) (Köhler, 1940) (,, 1970) (Köhler & Wallach, 1944) (, 1970) (Wallach et al.,1951)... (, 1970).... (Köhler, 1940). 10., et al.... :,, (1970).., 20-25. (1975).,,. Miller, G. A. (1950). Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill. Osgood, C. E. (1983). Psycholinguistics. In S. Koch(Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (pp. 244-416). New York: McGraw-Hill. Werner, H., & Chandler, K. A. (1950). Experiences on sensory-tonic field. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 346-350. 11., APA Publication Manual. 12... 한국발달심리학회윤리규정 (www.baldal.or.kr).
* -. 2,. 2.,,..,. * 2014 BK21. (2014).,,,,,,,,,. :,, 84, E-mail: yochoi@cau.ac.kr
., (, referent) ( ). (mapping) (,, Markman, 1990) (fast mapping, Behrend, 1990; Hoff, 2011; Markman, 1990).. - (retention) (Bloom, 2002; Horst & Samuelson, 2008; Horst, Scott, & Pollard, 2010).? Horst Samuelson(2008),. 24 (referent selection task) 5 (retention task).,,.,. 24 ( ). 5,.. 2 5. 18, 24, 30, Bion, Borovsky Fernald(2013) 30.?,,
., Bion (2013) 18, 24 30 30, 2. 30 ( ) 3 2, (Horst et al., 2010). 1 2 2 (Spiegel & Halberda, 2011). Horst (2010).,.,.,.. Axelsson, Churchley Horst(2012). 24,, (ostensive naming)., 5. Horst (2010). Axelsson (2012).,.,,,,,,,.
. (Fenson et al., 1994).? Horst (2010) Axelsson (2012),.. (pointing), (gaze following), (joint attention), (third-party social interaction), (, ) (Akhtar, 2005; Baldwin, 1991; Kalagher & Yu, 2006; Tomasello & Barton, 1994; Tomasello & Farrar, 1986)., Baldwin(1991) 18,,,. Brooks Meltzoff(2005) 10-11 14, 18. 3 (joint attention, Tomasello & Todd, 1983;, 2007 ) (Tomasello & Todd, 1983; Carpenter, Nagell, & Tomasello, 1998). (2011),. Kalagher Yu(2006).,, 18-30.? Horst (2010) Axelsson (2012). Axelsson (2012)..
Horst Samuelson(2008) Horst (2010),.. Horst (2010)., Kalagher Yu(2006), ( ), Horst (2010), ( ) 4. ( ). Horst (2010)? - (third-party social interaction. )- (Akhtar, Jipson & Callanan, 2001; Akhtar, 2005, O Doherty, Troseth, Shimpi, Goldenberg, Akhtar, & Saylor, 2011)., (,, ). Akhtar(2005) 25 30,.,,.. O Doherty (2011) 30
., Kim Mundy(2012)., (Initiating Joint Attention; IJA) (Responding Joint Attention: RJA).. (Akhtar, 2005; Baldwin, 1991; Kalagher & Yu, 2006; Tomasello & Barton, 1994; Tomasello & Farrar, 1986),., Horst (2010). Horst (2010).,. (third-party social interaction, O Doherty et al., 2011).,.. 2 Horst (2010). (2014) 2 ( 31 ). (Horst, 2010) 2 60% 2 40%,
. 2,.,,.. 19 2 2, 2, 1 14. 50% 11 ( 31.7, 28-34, 7 ). Horst (2010). 50%.. 16 8.,. (,,,,,,, ).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ( 1, 2 )., 3. 5. 1. 5 (,..? ), 5
... (? ). 4, 4 8. 5. 이건코끼리야 ( 총 5 회언급 ) 이건오리야 ( 총 5 회언급 ) 이건삐소야 ( 총 5 회언급 ) 이건또마야 ( 총 5 회언급 ) 까티를찾아줄래? ( 총 5회언급 ) 또마를찾아줄래? ( 총 5회언급 )
. 5 4 1,. 4 (,?????). 5., 4 ( )..,. 5 ( 2 ). 5. 4, 4 8. 5 4 1. 4 5. Kuhl, Tsao Liu(2003). Kuhl (2003),. 5 /. 10 5 ( ).
4 1, 0. 0 1 (4 )., (M=1.0, SD=.00). (, M=0.98, SD=.08;, t(10) = 39.37, <.001,, M= 1.0, SD=.00). ( 4 ), ( (3, 7) =.237, =.87, (1, 7) =.269, =.62 (2, 7) =.345 =.72).,,. 1, 0., 4 ( 0-1 ). 4,, ( (3, 7) =.824, =.52, (1, 7) =.043, =.84 (2, 7). = 1.269 =.34). 3 (M = 0.34, SD = 0.17) (M = 0.57, SD = 0.37) ( t, t(10) = -2.32, =.04).
4 0 3 3 0 2 2 5 3 0~1 6 3 11 11 1. 1 0-2 11 3 4, 2 3,. 2.., (M = 4.04, SD = 0.46) (M = 4.32, SD = 0.41). t, (t(9)= -3.28, =.01)., 2..,, 34% 57%.. Axelsson (2012)
. Axelsson (2012). Horst (2010) 2..,. 11., Axelsson (2012). O Doherty (2011),. (overhearing) (Aktar, 2011, Akhtar, 2005).,....
. 2......... Cartmill (2013) 3..,,...,.. Cartmill (2013).
. (2011). :,. (6), 217-234.,, (2007).. (5), 297-307. (2014).. (, ). Akhtar, N. (2005). The robustness of learning through overhearing. Developmental Science, 8(2), 199-209. Axelsson, E. L., Churchley, K., & Horst, J. S. (2012). The right thing at the right time: why ostensive naming facilitates word learning. Frontiers in psychology, 3. Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child development, 62(5), 874-890. Bloom, P. (2002). How children learn the meanings of words. MIT press. Bion, R. A., Borovsky, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Fast mapping, slow learning: Disambiguation of novel word-object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30months. Cognition, 126(1), 39-53. Brooks, R., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Developmental science, 8(6), 535-543. Cartmill, E, A., Armstrong III, B. F., Gleitman, L. R., Goldin-Medow, S., Medina, T. N., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(PNAS), 110(28), 11278-11283, doi:10.1073/pnas.1309518110 Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethick, S. J.,... & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the society for research in child development, i-185. Hoff, E. (2011)., (,, ), : Cengage Learning Korea. Horst, J. S., & S amuelson, L. K. (2008). Fast mapping but poor retention by 24-month-old infants. Infancy, 13(2), 128-157. Horst, J. S., Scott, E. J., & Pollard, J. A. (2010). The role of competition in word learning via referent selection. Developmental Science, 13(5), 706-713. Kalagher, H., & Yu, C. (2006). The effects of deictic pointing in word learning. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Development and Learning. Bloomington, IN. Kim, K., & Mundy, P. (2012). Joint attention, social-cognition, and recognition memory in adults. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6. Kucker, S. C., & Samuelson, L. K. (2012). The First Slow Step: Differential Effects of Object and Word Form Familiarization on Retention of Fast Mapped Words. Infancy, 17(3),
295-323. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F. M., & Liu, H. M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096-9101. Markman, E. M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 57-77. O Doherty, K., Troseth, G. L., Shimpi, P. M., Goldenberg, E., Akhtar, N., &S aylor, M. M. (2011). Third Party Social Interaction and Word Learning From Video. Child development, 82(3), 902-915. Spiegel, C., & Halberda, J. (2011). Rapid fast-mapping abilities in 2-year-olds. Journal of experimental child psychology, 109(1), 132-140. Tomasello, M., & Barton, M. E. (1994). Learning words in nonostensive contexts. Developmental psychology, 30(5), 639. Tomasello, M., & Farrar, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child development, 1454-1463. Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2012). Fast mapping across time: memory processes support children s retention of learned words. Frontiers in psychology, 3. Yuan, S., & Fisher, C. (2009). Really? She blicked the baby? : Two-year-olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening. Psychological Science, 20, 619-626. 1 : 2014. 10. 15. : 2014. 11. 28. : 2014. 12. 03.
The Role of Third-party Interaction in Retaining Newly Learned Words Eunju Jung Youngon Choi Chung-Ang University, Psychology Successful word learning requires retaining a newly learned connection between the label and the referent, as well as mapping of the referent to the label. Prior research has demonstrated that unlike their impressive mapping abilities, 2-year-olds display a great deal of difficulty in retaining newly learned referent-label associations, even after a 5-minute delay between mapping and retention tasks. The present study examined whether watching adults interact with the target referent during mapping can help Korean-learning 2-year-olds to retain newly mapped words after a 5-minute delay. Eleven 2-year-olds with very low scores on an earlier retention task scored much higher in the retention test when they mapped the novel words after watching two adults interact with the referent object. Furthermore, the child s attention level was rated higher during the mapping task with a social interaction cue than during mapping without a social cue. These results suggest that adults interactions with the target referent help direct and maintain the child s attention to the target referent, and this facilitates the retention of newly mapped words among young word learners. Key words : language development, word learning, fast mapping, retention, third-party social interaction, attention