Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Basic Study on t

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: Operation Plan of W

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The obje

이용석 박환용 - 베이비부머의 특성에 따른 주택유형 선택 변화 연구.hwp

상담학연구. 9., , 21..,,,,,,... (Corresponding Author): / / 154 Tel: /

歯1.PDF

서론 34 2

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /



04 형사판례연구 hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

12이문규

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯14.양돈규.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: Exploring Education

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

,......

KD hwp

,......



Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

<31372DB9DABAB4C8A32E687770>

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

부산교육 311호

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * The Meaning of Pl

(5차 편집).hwp

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의


歯02-2.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: ICF Core Set : * Devel

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

12¾ÈÇö°æ 1-155T304®¶ó

11¹ÚÇý·É

2 佛敎學報 第 48 輯 서도 이 목적을 준수하였다. 즉 석문의범 에는 승가의 일상의례 보다는 각종의 재 의식에 역점을 두었다. 재의식은 승가와 재가가 함께 호흡하는 공동의 場이므로 포 교와 대중화에 무엇보다 중요한 역할을 수행할 수 있다는 믿음을 지니고 있었다. 둘째

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: : C An Exploration

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

<C3D6C1BEBFCFBCBA2DBDC4C7B0C0AFC5EBC7D0C8B8C1F D31C8A3292E687770>

<332EC0E5B3B2B0E62E687770>

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.79-102 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.27.2.201706.79 * Review of Research Trends on Curriculum for Students with Severe and multiple disabilities in Korea Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze current for ten years research Trends of curriculum for students with severe and multiple disabilities in Korea. Through this study, we suggested tasks and direction of future research and base data for effective curriculum development of students with severe and multiple disabilities. Method: For we reviewed, 25 papers published in domestic professional journals over the past 10 years from 2007 to 2016. The results of the study were as follows. Results: First, the trends of curriculum for students with severe and multiple disabilities were analyzed quantitatively according to four variables: publication year, research method, research area, and redundancy type. Second, the qualitative analysis of the study on the curriculum for students with severe and multiple disabilities showed that five main categories: The basic curriculum organization and operation, the direction and teaching method of subject matter education, the theory and model of curriculum, review of overseas curriculum, the others. Conclusion: Based on the above results, we searched major issues in the curriculum for students with severe and multiple disabilities and suggested the direction of follow up study. Key words : severe and multiple disabilities, curriculum, research trends * 2016. Corresponding Author: Kim, Hye-Ri. Joongbu University, Dept. of Secondary Special Education, 305, Dongheon-ro, Deogyang-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 412-480, Korea, e-mail: miss1117@joongbu.ac.kr

. 1980 (Snell & Brown, 2006).,, (, 2010). (, 2011;,, 2013;, 2011;, 2011). (, 2012). 2012,,,,, (, 2015).,, (, 2011).,, (, 2012)., (,, 2013).,

(Stodden, Galloway, & Stodden, 2003),.,, 100% (,,,, 2013)., (, 2011)., -,, - (,,,, 2013).,,,,,, (,, 2015). (,, 2015).,, -.,, -, (,, 2015).,

(, 2010)., 2012 2-3., (2015).,,.. 10,..,?,?. KERIS( ), KISS( ), DBpia( ), 2007 2016 10.,,,,,,, -, 30 1, 25..

, 10. (,, 2015;,, 2011;,,, 2015;,, 2012) 10, 7 2008.,., 10.,,,,,,,, -, 1.,.,.,,, IEP,, -,,.,,,, 4 %. (,, 2011;,, 2009;,,, 2015;,, 2012), (2006).,,, 4,,,,,, 6,,,

, 4.,. Strauss Corbin(1998),,, (, 2012).,.,,,, 5., 1. 25 ( / + ) 100, 97%. 2., 1 1 5 (,,,, ), 4..,,,,.

.,,, 4. 1) 논문게재연도 % 2007 1 4.0 2008 0 0.0 2009 1 4.0 2010 3 12.0 2011 5 20.0 2012 3 12.0 2013 5 20.0 2014 2 8.0 2015 3 12.0 2016 2 8.0 25 100.0 2011 2013 5 (20.0%), 2010. 10 25. 2) 연구방법 % 11 44.0 6 24.0 1 4.0 7 28.0 25 100.0 11 (44.0%), (28.0%), (24.0%).

. 7,. 3) 연구영역 % 3 12.0 3 12.0 3 12.0 12 48.0 2 8.0 2 8.0 25 100.0 12 (48.0%),.. 4) 중복장애유형 % 2 8.0 5 20.0 1 4.0 17 68.0 25 100.0, 17 (68.0%), 5 (20.0%), 2 (8.0%), 1 (4.0%).,

,,,, (,,, IEP ) 5. 1) 기본교육과정편성 운영 2012, (, 2014)., 50%, (,, 2013)., 2012., (, 2014). (, 2013)., (,,, 2013), (, 2011). (, 2011)., 100%

(,,,, 2013)., (2015),,., (2010),,,,. - (,,,, 2013)., (,, 2013;, 2011), (,, 2015)., -,,, (,, 2015).,,, (, 2013).,,, -., (, 2011).

2) 교과교육의방향성및교수방법 (, 2013). 50%, (, 2012)., (,, 2012).,, (,, 2015).,, (,, 2012)., (, 2011), (, 2012).,, - (,, 2012).,

(, 2013). (2012) -., (2012) ICT,.,. (, 2014). (2010) Dewey.,, 3,. 3) 교육과정이론및모형,, (, 2010). (2010),., (2011),,,

,., (,, 2011). (2015) - (Merleau-Ponty),,,,,,,,,,,,. 4) 국외교육과정분석 (2011),,,,,,.,, (2013),,. 5) 기타 ( 통합교육을위한일반교육과정접근, 학교수준교육과정편성운영방안, 교육과정재구성, IEP 연계방안등 ) 51,,

, (,, 2016).,, (,, 2016).,, (,, 2011)., (,, 2013).,, (, 2014). (,, 2013)., (,, 2016).,, IEP, IEP IEP

(,, 2016)., (, 2011).. 10,.., 2011 2013 2010, 10 25. 7, 2008 (, 2011;,, 2011;, 2011;, 2011;, 2011)., 2012, 2013,. 10 25.,,,,.

, (2015),, ( ),,..,.,,,,., (2015). (2010),.,,.,,.,,.., (,, 2013;, 2011).,

, (,, 2015).,, 2012,,., 2012 (2014) 2012,,,.,, (2013) 2012 50%,., (2015),.. - (,, 2015).

(, 2013), (,,,, 2016). 100% (,,,, 2013),,.,, (, 2011;,, 2015;,, 2015;, 2011;, 2013;, 2011)., (,,, 2013). Agran, Alper, & Wehmeyer(2002),., (, 2015). (2014),. (2009),. (2014)

,.,.,,. Alquraini(2012).,, (2012) -, -.,, (,, 2016). -,., (,, 2012),, (,, 2012). (, 2012). (, 2015).,,,,.

,,.,,. (2015).,,. (,,, 2013),..,,,,, IEP.,.,, (,, 2017).,., (2016) 51,,.

,. (*). * (2009). 2008,. (1), 335-361. * (2011).. (3), 339-355. (2012).. *, (2011).. (3), 171-196. *, (2015).. (4), 73-98.,,, (2016).. (3), 335-363. (2012).., 85-102. *,,, (2013).. (1), 163-185. *, (2015).. (1), 175-197. *, (2013). 2011. (2), 105-128. * (2010).. (4), 149-166. * (2011).. (3), 457-477. * (2015)..

(4), 1-22., (2017).. (1), 127-152. * (2011).. (2), 259-282. *, (2016). :. (3), 115-142., (2011). : 2000. (4), 25-46. *,, (2007).. (2), 345-368. (2012)..., (2009).. (4), 407-427. * (2010).. (2), 23-41., (2006). :. *, (2016).. (4), 111-140. * (2014).. (3), 107-131.,, (2015). : 2005. (1), 337-362. *, (2012).. (1), 51-73. * (2010).. (1), 69-98. * (2012).. (3), 1-20. * (2013).. (1), 19-42. * (2014)..

(3), 187-211. *,, (2013).. (2), 109-127. (2011).. (4), 179-202. *, (2012).. (2), 199-221. *, (2013).. (2), 225-245, (2012). : 2000 2011. (4), 115-135., (2012). :. (1), 1-22. (2013).. (3), 27-52. * (2011). - -. (1), 217-235. Agran, M., Alper, S., & Wehmeyer, M. (2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 123-133. Alquraini, A. T. (2012). Factors related to teachers attitudes towards the inclusive education of students with severe intellectual disabilities in Riyadh, Saudi. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(3), 170-182. Snell, M. E., & Brown, E. (2006). Instruction of students with severe disabilities(6th ed). Pearson Merill: Prentice Hall. Stodden, R. A., Galloway, L. M., & Stodden, N. J. (2003). Secondary school curricula issues: Impact on postsecondary students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, 9-25. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedure for developing Grounded theory(2nd ed). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications. Inc.. : 2017.5.5 / : 2017.5.18 / : 2017.6.20

: 10,. : 2007 2016 10 25,. :,,,, 4.,,,,, 5. :.