Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

歯1.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

2. NCS는 무엇인가 NCS는 산업현장에서 직무를 수행하기 위하여 요구되는 지식 기술 소양 등의 내용을 국가가 산업 부문별 수준별로 체계화한 것을 말한다( 자격기본법 제2조). 다시 말하면, NCS는 모든 산 업 분야의 일터에서 일을 할 때 필요한 내용들을 담아낸 산

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

키고 있다. 이하에서는 이러한 인적자원과 자격에 대한 주요 정책 이슈들을 논의한다. Ⅱ. 인적자원의 형성과 활용의 흐름 인적자원의 흐름은 사람이 태어나서 무덤에 이르는 생애기간 동안 학습하고, 학습결과를 일터 에서 활용하는 것을 망라하는 넓은 영역을 포괄한다. 우선 이

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>



27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Á¶´öÈñ_0304_final.hwp

歯14.양돈규.hwp


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

<28BCF6BDC D B0E6B1E2B5B520C1F6BFAABAB020BFA9BCBAC0CFC0DAB8AE20C1A4C3A520C3DFC1F8C0FCB7AB5FC3D6C1BE E E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Æ÷Àå½Ã¼³94š

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: The Exploratory Stu

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

02양은용

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

< FC3D6C1BEBCF6C1A45FB1E2B5B6B1B3B1B3C0B0B3EDC3D E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析


ƯÁý2-~27pš

서론 34 2

50-5대지05장후은.indd

<32382DC3BBB0A2C0E5BED6C0DA2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

레이아웃 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Basic Study on t

(5차 편집).hwp


.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

Æ÷Àå82š

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

3. 클라우드 컴퓨팅 상호 운용성 기반의 서비스 평가 방법론 개발.hwp


,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제

278 경찰학연구제 12 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 31 호 )

#Ȳ¿ë¼®


<31362DB1E8C7FDBFF82DC0FABFB9BBEA20B5B6B8B3BFB5C8ADC0C720B1B8C0FC20B8B6C4C9C6C32E687770>

ePapyrus PDF Document

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.133-158 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.27.1.201703.133 NCS : G * The Analysis of the Cognitive Level of Basic Job Skills of Specialized High School Based on NCS Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct the comparisons in cognitive level of basic job skills of graduates of specialized high schools, teachers of specialized high schools, and mainstream company workers. An optimal educational curriculum through the allocation of specialized, basic job skills was also suggested. Method: We analyzed the previous research on the basic ability of the profession through the theoretical review. In addition, the present status of NCS-based curriculum of G technical high school was described. The survey was conducted on teachers in G technical high school, alumni (new employees), large or medium-sized enterprises (more than 300 full-time employees), and Employees in SMEs. The questionnaire items consisted of 10 areas of occupational basic ability of National Competence Standard in which 34 items were developed. Results: Upon examining statistics that analyze the current levels of basic job skills. The results showed that the level of Basic Job Skills recognized by large and medium-sized enterprise workers was significantly higher than those of high school graduates. However, small businesses demonstrated that specialized high school graduates surpassed the others in only 5 different categories. Second, an analysis of the differences in importance of basic job skills was also conducted. Third, to develop curriculum for basic skills of specialization high school mechanical department to organize and operate NCS-based curriculum, in this study, the importance of job basic ability of graduates, teachers, and corporate workers is analyzed and suggested implications for actual education. Conclusion: This research was undertaken with the use of statistic skills. The following researches are expected to be investigated in a deep and elaborate level, and to be connected to the researches in curriculum development and effect. Key words : NCS, Basic Job Skills, Specialized high school * (2015). Corresponding Author: Bae, Gwang-Min, Korea University of Technology and Education, Dept. of Humanities & Sciences and HRD, 1600, Chungjeol-ro, Byeongcheon-myeon, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, 31253 Republic of Korea, e-mail: hongdan7@koreatech.ac.kr

. (National Competency Standards, NCS). NCS,. NCS NCS. NCS,.. NCS OO, OO 10 10. 2014 3 NCS, NCS /. NCS (,,,, 2013,,,,,, 2013,,,,,, 2013). (,,,,, 2013).,.,, (2011),.,,,,,,. (2005),

,.. NCS,,. NCS. NCS 10 34. NCS..,.,.,,,.,.. (,,,,, 1998).,,. (1997).,, (2000),

,,,,, (2004),,,,.,. SCANS. (,, ) (,,,, ) (SCANS, 1992). ASTD. Carrnevale, Gainer, Meltzer(1990),,,,,, 7. OECD,,,,, (Binkley, 2005). NCS 10,. < -1>. 1),,,,,,,

( ) (,, ), (,, ),,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1) (www.ncs.go.kr).

( ),,,,,, : (2017)...,, (2006). (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ), (,, ), (,, ) 6,,,,,,,,.,,.,, (2011).,,,,.,,,.

NCS..,,,, G,. NCS NCS,, 4 (, 2014)., (, 2013). 3, NCS. G 2013 NCS, NCS NCS, NCS, NCS 3. G NCS.,,,,.,,, ( ) NCS..

NCS G,. () 2014 9,, 2015 2. 2015 3. 300 (, 2010). (2010), 300, 80, (50 )(2015), (2015) (300 ), (100 300 ), (100 ) 1.,,. G ( ) ( ). /,. < -1>. 49 43 144 236 3 8 30 41 30 4 56 60 31 ~40 15 75 90 41 ~50 11 30 41 51 ~60 20 11 31 61 1 2 3 3 3 85 88 3 ~5 11 16 27 5 ~10 4 34 38 10 ~15 5 20 25

( ) 15 ~20 9 8 17 20 19 11 30 117 117 57 57 NCS,. < -2>. 1-1 5-4 1-2 6-1 1-3 6-2 1-4 6-3 1-5 6-4 2-1 6-5 2-2 7-1 2-3 7-2 2-4 8-1 3-1 8-2 3-2 8-3 4-1 9-1 4-2 9-2 4-3 9-3 5-1 9-4 5-2 10-1 5-3 10-2, (,,, ).,,. < -3>.

() 2015 1 5 2015 3 31,, email,.,,. 10, 34, 1 5 Likert 5. 30 Cronbach's α= 0.95. SPSS 18.0 t, (ANOVA)... 1) 기계계열기업근로자규모별현재수준차이분석. (N1) (N2) t. < -1>.

2-1 2-2 2-3 2-4 3-1 4-3 (N1=117, N2=57) N1 3.63.81.074 N2 3.25.61.080 N1 3.27.90.083 N2 2.98.72.095 N1 3.45.81.075 N2 2.95.67.088 N1 3.27.84.078 N2 2.84.65.086 N1 3.38.65.061 N2 3.16.77.103 N1 3.36.78.072 N2 3.09.85.113 < -2>. (2-1, 2-2, 2-3, 2-4) (3-1), (4-3). < -1>. Levene t- F t () 2-1 11.645.001* 3.210 172.00.002*.387.121 3.534 142.77.001*.387.109 2-2 8.635.004* 2.137 172.00.034*.291.136 2.305 135.39.023*.291.126 2-3 11.646.001* 4.068 172.00.000*.506.124 4.359 133.22.000*.506.116 2-4 8.311.004* 3.329 172.00.001*.423.127 3.641 140.44.000*.423.116 3-1.144.704 2.017 172.00.045*.227.112 1.904 96.14.060.227.119 4-3.331.566 2.086 172.00.038*.271.130 2.026 103.11.045.271.134 *p<.05

2) 기계계열졸업생, 기업근로자현재수준차이분석.,. (N1) (N2) t, < -3>. 1-1 1-5 2-2 2-3 2-4 3-2 4-3 5-1 5-3 5-4 6-2 7-1 7-2 (N1=52, N2=117) N1 3.27.73.092 N2 3.63.71.067 N1 2.15.85.107 N2 2.58.95.090 N1 2.79.727.092 N2 3.27.90.085 N1 2.95.97.123 N2 3.45.80.075 N1 2.82 1.00.127 N2 3.28.84.079 N1 2.90.78.099 N2 3.39.67.063 N1 3.10.82.105 N2 3.38.77.073 N1 3.11.89.113 N2 3.36.71.067 N1 2.90.74.094 N2 3.19.65.061 N1 2.90.80.102 N2 3.22.68.064 N1 2.95 1.02.129 N2 3.24.848.080 N1 3.11 1.03.130 N2 3.64.70.065 N1 3.00.89.113 N2 3.47.77.072, < -4>. (1-1), (1-5), (2-2), (2-3), (2-4),

(3-2), (4-3), (5-1), (5-3), (5-4), (6-2), (7-1, 7-2). < -3>. Levene t- F t () 1-1.002.962-3.129 173.002* -.354.113-3.105 122.952.002* -.354.114 1-5 3.321.070-3.032 173.003* -.439.145-3.138 138.659.002* -.439.140 2-2 5.121.025-3.635 173.000* -.484.133-3.865 149.055.000* -.484.125 2-3.238.627-3.664 173.000* -.500.136-3.472 107.508.001* -.500.144 2-4.570.451-3.240 173.001* -.461.142-3.079 108.431.003* -.461.150 3-2.003.953-4.306 173.000* -.486.113-4.122 110.678.000* -.486.118 4-3.777.379-2.272 173.024* -.284.125-2.228 118.798.028* -.284.127 5-1 1.595.208-2.036 173.043* -.24993.123-1.907 103.971.059 -.250.131 5-3.477.491-2.693 173.008* -.291.108-2.596 112.959.011* -.291.112 5-4.038.846-2.776 173.006* -.318.115-2.642 108.862.009* -.318.120 6-2.068.794-1.997 173.047* -.287.144-1.895 108.037.061 -.287.152 7-1 4.779.030-4.011 173.000* -.524.131-3.596 92.408.001* -.524.146 7-2 1.195.276-3.654 173.000* -.469.128-3.504 111.301.001* -.469.134 *p<.05,. < -5>.

3-2 5-4 7-1 7-2 10-2 (N1=52, N2=57) N1 2.90.78.099 N2 3.28.82.108 N1 2.90.80.102 N2 3.23.82.109 N1 3.11 1.03.130 N2 3.46.83.109 N1 3.00.89.113 N2 3.37.82.108 N1 3.98.88.111 N2 3.63.75.099, < -6>. (3-2), (5-4), (7-1, 7-2), (10-2). < -5> (3-2), (5-4), (7-1, 7-2), (10-2). Levene t- F t () 3-2.673.414-2.571 117.00.011* -.377.147-2.566 115.10.012* -.377.147 5-4 1.178.280-2.176 117.00.032* -.325.149-2.173 115.61.032* -.325.149 7-1.469.495-2.000 117.00.048* -.343.172-2.018 115.02.046* -.343.170 7-2.932.336-2.352 117.00.020* -.368.157-2.360 117.00.020* -.368.156 10-2.338.562 2.348 117.00.021*.352.150 2.364 116.33.020*.352.149 *p<.05 () 13 (,

,,,,,,,,,,, ), 4.,,. 1) 졸업생, 교사, 기업근로자중요도차이분석,, < -7>.,,.,, (),. df F 1-2 - 4.419 2 2.210 3.374.036* - 148.663 227.655 2-4 - 7.906 2 3.953 4.627.011* - 193.937 227.854 7-1 - 8.420 2 4.210 6.928.001* - 137.946 227.608 8-2 - 4.721 2 2.361 3.733.025* - 143.561 227.632 9-2 - 3.439 2 1.720 3.088.048* - 126.404 227.557 *p<.05 (1-2), (2-4), (7-1), (8-2), (9-2). LSD( ) < -8>.

1-2 2-4 7-1 8-2 9-2 *p<.05 (I) (J) 95% (I-J) -.260.150.085 -.555.036 -.329*.128.011 -.581 -.077.260.150.085 -.036.555 -.069.133.604 -.331.193.328*.128.011.077.582.069.133.604 -.193.331 -.196.171.253 -.534.141 -.436*.146.003 -.724 -.148.196.171.253 -.141.534 -.240.152.116 -.539.060.436*.146.003.148.724.240.152.116 -.060.539 -.377*.144.010 -.661 -.092 -.450*.123.000 -.693 -.207.377*.144.010.092.661 -.073.128.568 -.326.179.450*.123.000.207.693.073.128.568 -.179.326.386*.147.009.095.676.263*.126.037.016.511 -.386*.147.009 -.676 -.095 -.122.131.351 -.380.135 -.263*.126.037 -.511 -.016.122.131.351 -.135.380.313*.138.024.041.586.247*.118.037.015.480 -.313*.138.024 -.586 -.041 -.066.123.590 -.308.176 -.247*.118.037 -.480 -.015.066.123.590 -.176.308,, () < -9>.

n F LSD (a) 62 3.71.84 1-2 (b) 55 4.00.64 3.374.036* a<c (c) 113 3.92.66 230 3.88.71 (a) 62 3.11 1.13 2-4 (b) 55 3.31.90 4.627.011* a<c (c) 113 3.55.80 230 3.37.94 (a) 62 3.53.94 7-1 (b) 55 3.91.67 6.928.001* a<b,c (c) 113 3.98.73 230 3.84.80 (a) 62 4.11.79 8-2 (b) 55 3.73.73 3.733.025* b,c<a (c) 113 3.85.83 230 3.89.80 (a) 62 3.82.84 9-2 (b) 55 3.51.74 3.088.048* b,c<a (c) 113 3.58.69 230 3.63.75 *p<.05 (7-1), (8-2), (9-2),,..,.,, < -10>.

df F 6-1 - 8.186 2 4.093 7.250.001* - 96.533 171.565 7-1 - 5.218 2 2.609 3.979.020* - 112.121 171.656 8-2 - 6.680 2 3.340 6.247.002* - 91.435 171.535 9-2 - 3.361 2 1.680 3.095.048* - 92.829 171.543 10-1 - 4.081 2 2.040 3.909.022* - 89.258 171.522 10-2 - 5.117 2 2.558 4.413.014* - 99.142 171.580 *p<.05,, () (6-1), (7-1), (8-2), (9-2), (10-1, 10-2). < -11>. 6-1 7-1 8-2 (I) (J) 95% (I-J).115.139.411 -.160.389.505*.138.000.233.777 -.115.139.411 -.389.160.390*.142.007.110.672 -.505*.138.000 -.777 -.233 -.390*.142.007 -.671 -.110 -.377*.150.013 -.673 -.081 -.345*.149.021 -.638 -.052.377*.150.013.081.673.033.153.835 -.270.334.345*.149.021.052.638 -.032.153.835 -.334.270.386*.135.005.118.653.429*.134.002.164.694 -.386*.135.005 -.653 -.118.043.138.756 -.230.316 -.429*.134.002 -.694 -.164 -.043.138.756 -.316.230

( ) 9-2 10-1 10-2 *p<.05 (I) (J) 95% (I-J).313*.136.023.044.583.261.135.055 -.006.528 -.313*.136.023 -.584 -.044 -.052.139.708 -.327.223 -.261.135.055 -.528.006.052.139.708 -.224.327 -.041.134.759 -.305.223.305*.133.023.043.567.041.134.759 -.223.305.346*.137.012.077.616 -.305*.133.023 -.567 -.043 -.346*.137.012 -.616 -.077 -.075.141.594 -.354.203.324*.140.022.048.600.075.141.594 -.203.354.399*.144.006.115.684 -.324*.140.022 -.600 -.048 -.399*.144.006 -.684 -.115,, () < -12>. (7-1), (8-2), (9-2), (10-1, 10-2).,. n F LSD (a) 62 4.24.78 6-1 (b) 55 4.13.79 7.250.001* c<b,a (c) 57 3.74.67 174 4.04.78 (a) 62 3.53.94 7-1 (b) 55 3.91.67 3.979.020* a<c,b (c) 57 3.88.78 174 3.76.82 (a) 62 4.11.79 8-2 (b) 55 3.73.73 6.247.002* c,b<a (c) 57 3.68.66 174 3.85.75

( ) n F LSD (a) 62 3.82.84 9-2 (b) 55 3.51.74 3.095.048* b<a (c) 57 3.56.60 174 3.64.75 (a) 62 4.32.74 10-1 (b) 55 4.36.73 3.909.022* c<a,b (c) 57 4.02.69 174 4.24.73 (a) 62 4.31.86 10-2 (b) 55 4.38.73 4.413.014* c<a,b (c) 57 3.98.67 174 4.22.78 *p<.05 4 (,,, ),.,. NCS,,.. G.,,. NCS,

< -13>.,. /,,.. (,, )...,,..,,,..,,,, NCS.,.,,. NCS / G,,

NCS. NCS 3 G NCS (,, ). 2015 247 139 ( 56%), 1-3. 34., Cronbach's α..,.,,,,,,,,,,,, 13.,,,.,,,. 5,. 6,,, NCS,,.,,..

,..,, (2016) /..,.,,. (, ), 3., NCS 10, 34. NCS 10.,, NCS,.,..,..

,,,, (2013). :. (2017). (10 ). :. (2015). CSR, (2), 9-43.,, (2011).. :.,,, (2013). NCS. :. (2014). NCS -(NCS). : ( ).,,,, (2013).,. (2010)... (2010)...,, (2006).. (2), 145-170.,, (2016).. (3), 17-36.,, (2000)...,,,,,,, (1997).. (2), 109-130.,, (2011).. (4), 51-67. (2005).. :. (2015)...,,, (2004). :.,,,, (1998).

..,,,, (2013).. (2013). : NCS. Murray, T. S., Clermont, Y., & Binkley, M. (2005). Moving towards measurement: The overarching conceptual framework for the ALL Study. Statistics CANADA. Carrnevale, A. P., Gainer, L. J., & Meltzer, A. S. (1990). Workplace basics: The Essential Skills Employers Want. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. SCANS (1992). Learning a living: A blueprint for high performance. Wasington, D. C: U. S. Department of Labor. (Secretary s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, 1991: ). : 2017.1.14 / : 2017.2.27 / : 2017.3.20

NCS : G :,,,. :, G NCS. G (), ( 300 ), 10 34. :,. 13. 5.,,,., NCS,,. :,..