Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp DOI: * (,, )..,., ( ),.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp DOI: * (,, )..,., ( ),."

희경 오
5 years ago
Views:

1 Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp DOI: * (,, )..,., ( ),.,.,.. * (2 ). ** 1 : *** : ( ddhahn@pusan.ac.kr)

2 .,, (Chen, 2008; John et al., 2011; Patterson et al., 2014; Sundaram, 2013),,,,.. ( ), (, 2015;, 2013).,,,,,, (Vivolo et al., 2011: 141). (fact),, (reality) (Blumer, 1969).,,.,,.,,,.,. ( ) (, 2015;, 2013;, 2012;, 2013a, 2013b;, 2012;, 2012), (, 2012;, 2011;,, 2014;, 2014;,, 2014;, 2014), (, 2013;,, 2012;, 2014;, 2013).,., (Craft & Maunder, 2012; Pellegrini & Long, 2002; Pratt & George, 2005; Weller, 2007).,.

3 2 (,, )..,?, ( )?,?.. (symbolic interactionism).,,,,, (Blumer, 1969). (Woods, 1983: 39).,,,?,,?,,? (,,,,, ).,, (Woods, 1983: 24).,., (Woods, 1983: 24-25). (definition of the situation),.,.

4 ,. (, ), (Woods, 1983: 45).,. (Woods, 1983: 67)., ( ),,,,.,,.,,,,. ( ),,., (, 2015;, 2013;, 2012;, 2013a, 2013b;, 2012;, 2012) ( )., (2013b). (2012),., (2012).,. ( ). (

5 , 2012;, 2011;,, 2014;, 2014;,, 2014;, 2014)., (2014)., (2011), (2014), (2014), (auto-ethnography),., (2014),,,,.. (, 2013;,, 2012;, 2014;, 2013)., (2013) (2004 ),, (, 2013)., (2014),., (, 2014).,. ( ),,., ( ),,.,.

6 ( ), A 6 3. (1 ) (2 ), ( ) (4 ) (8 ), (1 ). A. (SES),.,., (2013 ) A 6 3 S 10,., ( ),,.,., ( ) < -1>.., ( ), (2015, 2 ),., ,...,, (crevasse). 2, A,,,,.

7 ., ( ) ( ),. N 2.,. ( ),.,,. B.,. 1,. C, ( ) (,, ). ( ). 2, ( ). C,.,. 3.. C, , A,. ( ),. ( ), ,.,. ( ), ( ).

8 .,, (2 ).,,., , (2 ).., ( : ) (2 ), (,, ),.,,. ( ) ( 1 ) ( 3 ) FGI(Focus Group Interview), (, ). FGI ( )., FGI,., (2 ) ( ). ( ),., ( ) FGI. (abduction),., (2014) (, 1, 2, 3 ). ( : : (

9 ), ( ) : : ( ), : : ( ) )..,., ( ),,.,.,, ( ).,.,..,,,,,.. : ( ).,., ( ),.,.,,.

10 (Hamlall & Morrell, 2012). ( ),.,., ( ).., ( ),. ( ) 6,..,.., ( ). 1.,.,..,...,...,.,.,.?...

11 ,..... ( ,, ), (Cubukcu & Donmez, 2012: 38)., (bullying),,,,, (Murray, 2012).,..., ( ), ( ).,,.,. 2.,,.,, ( ).,,,..,,.,, ( )., ( ). 1,. 2 ( ),,

12 .,.,.,.,.,., , 3. ( ,, ) ( ).,.,.,. ( ).,..

13 ..,.., 1 ( )..,,.,. 2,., (stigma) (trauma)..,..,.,,,...,,, ,. ( )

14 .,.,...,.,.,. :..,.. : :..,.,.. :,..., 1... ( ( ), ) ( ).,,,,. (8 ),

15 ,., ( ),.,.!. ( ). 1,. ( ) (, ). ( )., ( ).,..! ( ).. ( )?..,. ( ) 12 30??... (,

16 .) ( ),. ( ) ( ),. ( ) FGI, ( ).,,.,.,.,,.,., ( ).,, ( ),, ( )., 3.,,., (Waller, 1932).,., (zero tolerance)

17 (Chen, 2008). S,. S,..,,..... ( )...,.?,..?. 1?...,?. ( S. ) S,,,.,,. S,.,., S,,

18 .,.. ( ),,.,,,, ( ),.,.,,,. ( ),,.,,,...,.,.,,,.,,,, (, 2013). (, )

19 ,.,,.,.,,.,,.,., ( 7849 ).,.,., ( ),,,.,.,,?,?.,, ( ),.,.,.,..,.,.,

20 .,,.,,. ( ).,,,.,.,...,,.,,.,,..,,,.,. (2013) (2012).. (3), , (2012).. (2), (2015)..

21 (1), (2013).. (3), (2011).. (5), (2012).. (3), , (2014). :. (1), ,,, (2014). -14-R08.., (2014).. (3), (2013a).. (3), (2013b) (2012).. (2), (2014)..., (2014).. (2), (2013). : (2013). :,,. (2), (2012). :. (1), ,, (2013).. (4), (2014).. (2), Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chen, G. (2008). Communities, students, schools, and school crime: A confirmatory study of crime in U.S. high schools. Urban Education, 43(3), Craft, S., & Maunder, R. (2012). Understanding transitions using a sociocultural framework. Educational &

22 Child Psychological Society, 29(1), Cubukcu, Z., & Donmez, A. (2012). Primary school administrators views about types of violence and methods coping with violence introduction. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 18(1), Hamlall, V., & Morrell, R. (2012). Conflict, provocation and fights among boys in a south african high school. Gender and Education, 24(5), Johnson, S. L., Burke, J. G., & Gielen, A. C. (2011). Prioritizing the school environment in school violence prevention efforts. Journal of School Health, 81(6), Murray, S. S., Hewitt, P., & Maniss, S. (2012). They re just being kids : Recognizing and preventing bullying. National Science Journal, 39(1), Patterson, R. M., Maldonado, N., & Howe, M. (2014). School district officials and city stakeholders perceptions regarding school violence and ways to prevent school violence. Paper presented at the annual mid-south educational research(msera) conference. Knoxville, Tennessee. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, Pratt, S., & George, R. (2005). Transferring friendship: Girls and boys friendships in the transition from primary to secondary school. Children & Society, 19, Sundaram, V. (2013). Violence as understandable, deserved or unacceptable? Listening for gender in teenagers talk about violence. Gender and Education, 25(7), Vivolo, A., Matjasko, J. L., & Massetti, G. M. (2011). Mobilizing communities and building capacity for youth violence prevention: The national academic centers of excellence for youth violence prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. NY: Wiley. Weller, S. (2007). Sticking with your mates? children s friendship trajectories during the transition from primary to secondary school. Children & Society, 21, Woods, P. (1983). Sociology and the school: An interactionist viewpoint. ( ) (1998). :. : / : / :

23 A Qualitative Case Study on the Definitions of Situation of Members regarding a School Violence in the Elementary School: Focusing on the - Na, Il-Su Case - * The purpose of this paper was to identify different definitions of the situation of members (students, parents, teacher) regarding a school violence by a longitudinal qualitative case study, which is rooted in symbolic interactionism. The specific results and conclusions were as follows. Firstly, a furious student as a trigger in a school violence, and his parents as complainant had pursued the human rights of students, and judical justice through raising a school violence problem against a elementary school and Office of Education. Secondly, the students and parents as defendant in a school violence event had made an effort to put the situation under control, had asserted judical innocence by overcoming stigma as an accident. Thirdly, a teacher in charge as a bystander had been left from a violence event in forfeiting educational authority. Meanwhile, a violence event in an elementary school was a subjective and multiple social reality according to different definitions of the situation and various interpretations of social actors rather than an objective social fact. The results of this paper would be able to provide insights to prevent and resolve school violence through profound understanding on the school violence based on the different definitions of situation of school members. Key words : School violence, Definition of the situation, Symbolic interactionism, Qualitative case study * This work was supported by a 2-Year Research Grant of Pusan National University

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.149-171 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.27.4.201712.149 * A Study on Teachers and Parents Perceptions on the Introduction of Innovational