Park and Lee (Korean Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Fourth edition [K-WPPSI-IV]) (Park, Lee, & Ahn, 2016). K-

Similar documents
Research Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(6): pissn: eissn: X A Study on the St

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Original Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(5): pissn: eissn: X Relationships A

서론 34 2

(5차 편집).hwp


歯14.양돈규.hwp

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of



27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

44-4대지.07이영희532~

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Rheu-suppl hwp


<30312DC1A4BAB8C5EBBDC5C7E0C1A4B9D7C1A4C3A52DC1A4BFB5C3B62E687770>

본문


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

,......

<5BBEF0BEEE33332D335D20312EB1E8B4EBC0CD2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

012임수진

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

<33362D312D3428B9DAC7FDBFF82CBCADBFB9B3AA2CC0CCC1F8BCF D FC3D6C1BE2E687770>

[ 영어영문학 ] 제 55 권 4 호 (2010) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1) Kyuchul Yoon, Ji-Yeon Oh & Sang-Cheol Ahn. Teaching English prosody through English poems with clon

3 한국심리학회지 : 발달 한국발달심리학회

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

서론

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

03이경미(237~248)ok

자기공명영상장치(MRI) 자장세기에 따른 MRI 품질관리 영상검사의 개별항목점수 실태조사 A B Fig. 1. High-contrast spatial resolution in phantom test. A. Slice 1 with three sets of hole arr

03-서연옥.hwp


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

,,,,,, ),,, (Euripides) 2),, (Seneca, LA) 3), 1) )

歯7권2호.PDF


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Nov.; 26(11),

<30345F D F FC0CCB5BFC8F15FB5B5B7CEC5CDB3CEC0C720B0BBB1B8BACE20B0E6B0FCBCB3B0E8B0A120C5CDB3CE20B3BBBACEC1B6B8ED2E687770>

민속지_이건욱T 최종

Æ÷Àå82š

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016;27(4): pissn X / eissn

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

2011´ëÇпø2µµ 24p_0628

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

ePapyrus PDF Document


<35335FBCDBC7D1C1A42DB8E2B8AEBDBAC5CDC0C720C0FCB1E2C0FB20C6AFBCBA20BAD0BCAE2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp


< D B4D9C3CAC1A120BCD2C7C1C6AEC4DCC5C3C6AEB7BBC1EEC0C720B3EBBEC8C0C720BDC3B7C2BAB8C1A4BFA120B4EBC7D120C0AFBFEBBCBA20C6F2B0A E687770>

레이아웃 1

Transcription:

Research Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(6):157-168 https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2016.37.6.157 pissn: 1226-1688 eissn: 2234-408X Intellectual Characteristics of Korean Children: Analyses of K-WPPSI-IV Performance Hyewon Park 1, KyungOk Lee 2 Department of Child & Family Welfare, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea 1 Department of Early Childhood Education, Duksung Women s University, Seoul, Korea 2 : Wechsler 4 (K-WPPSI-IV) 1, 2 1, 2 Objective: This study examined the intellectual characteristics of 1,700 Korean children aged 2 years, 6 months to 7 years, 7 months across two age ranges (2 years, 6 months to 3 years, 11 months; 4 years to 7 years, 7 months). Methods: Data from the standardization study of the K-WPPSI-IV were analyzed using Korean and American norms and in terms of socioeconomic variables such as region, maternal education level, and child gender. Results: Korean children performed differently from their American counterparts in most subtests and indexes. Verbal subtest performances for Korean children were significantly lower and performance subtest performances for Korean children were significantly higher. There were significant regional differences, with higher performances among children from Seoul than from other areas. Children whose mothers had higher education levels showed higher performances than their counterparts. This trend was more apparent in the older age range. Gender differences were found in most subtests, with girls showing higher scores than boys. Conclusion: This study revealed cross-cultural differences in intellectual characteristics measured with the newly standardized K-WPPSI-IV. In addition, significant effects of socioeconomic variables such as region, maternal education level, and gender were found. Keywords: K-WPPSI-IV, U.S. norm, differences by socioeconomic variables, gender differences., (Thurlow & Ysseldyke, 1979). (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence [WPPSI]) Corresponding Author: KyungOk Lee, Department of Early Childhood Education, Duksung Women s University, 33 Samyang-ro 144-gil, Dobonggu, Seoul, Korea E-mail: oaklee@duksung.ac.kr The Korean Association of Child Studies This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Park and Lee 158 1967 2012 4 4 (Korean Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Fourth edition [K-WPPSI-IV]) (Park, Lee, & Ahn, 2016). K-WPPSI-IV WPPSI-IV,, (Carroll, 1993, 1997; Horn & Blankson, 2012; Park et al., 2016; Wechsler, 2012). WPPSI-IV Wechsler WISC-IV (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition; Wechsler, 2003), WAIS-IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition; Wechsler, 2008) 5 4 (Ward, Bergman, & Herbert, 2012). (Verbal Comprehension [VCI]), (Visual Spatial [VSI]), (Fluid Reasoning [FRI]), (Working Memory [WMI]), (Processing Speed [PSI]) (Lee, Park, & Lee, 2015). (Vocabulary Acquisition [VAI]), (Nonverbal [NVI]), (General Ability [GAI]), (Cognitive Proficiency [CPI]). (Block Design [BD]), (Information [IN]), (Matrix Reasoning [MR]), (Bug Search [BS]), (Picture Memory [PM]), (Similarity [SI]), (Picture Concepts [PC]), (Cancellation [CA]), (Zoo Location [ZL]), (Object Assembly [OA]), (Vocabulary [VC]), (Animal Coding [AC]), (Comprehension [CO]), (Receptive Vocabulary [RV]), (Picture Naming [PN]) 15. (,,,, ). WPPSI-IV 2 6 7 7 2 6 3 11 (7 ) 4 7 7 (15 ).,,,,,, 7,, 3,, 3. 15 5, 4. K-WPPSI-IV.,. K-WPPSI-IV ( ) (Lee et al., 2015) (Hwang, Park, & Lee, 2015; Park, Seo, & Lee, 2015), (Park, Lee, Lee, & Park, 2016). WPPSI-IV,, (Raiford, Coalson, & Engi, 2014). (M = 102.5, SD = 14.8), (M = 101.7, SD = 15.3), (M = 101.1, SD = 16.1), (M = 98.3, SD = 12.5), (M = 95.7, SD = 13.9). 8 89.9 (SD = 12.0) 107.4 (SD = 13.8). 101.7 (SD = 14.7), 98.3 (SD = 15.2). (Shaffer & Kipp, 2014)... 1 K-WPPSI-IV?

159 Intellectual Characteristics of Korean Children 2 K-WPPSI-IV? 2-1. K-WPPSI-IV? 2-2. K-WPPSI-IV? 2-3. K-WPPSI-IV?. 9 (2 6 / 12 2 11 / 12 200, 3 3 5 / 12 200, 3 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 200, 4 4 5 / 12 200, 4 6 / 12 4 11 / 12 200, 5 5 5 / 12 200, 5 6 / 12 5 11 / 12 200, 6 6 11 / 12 200, 7 7 7 / 12 100 ). Park (2016). 연구도구 2016 K-WPPSI-IV (Figure 1 ) Table 1. 연구대상 K-WPPSI-IV 30 (2 6 / 12 ) 91 (7 7 / 12 ) 1,700.,,,, / 7 (2010 ). WPPSI-IV,,, 4. 연구절차및자료분석 2014 1 7. 82. 1 2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 30, 4 7 7 / 12 1. SPSS 21.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY). Table 2. Table 2 K-WPPSI-IV.,, t, F. 10, 3. 한국아동의 K-WPPSI-IV 수행 : 미국아동과의비교 Figure 1. K-WPPSI-IV test material. 2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 4

Park and Lee 160 Table 1 K-WPPSI-IV Subtest and Descriptions BD IN MR BS PM SI PC CA ZL OA VC AC CO RV PN VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ VAI NVI GAI CPI Description Working within a specified time limit, the child views a model and/or a picture and uses one- or two-color blocks to re-create the design. For picture items, the child selects the response option that best answers a question about a general-knowledge topic. For verbal items, the child answers questions about a broad range of general-knowledge topic. The child views an incomplete matrix and selects the response option that completes the matrix. Working within a specified time limit, the child marks the bug in the search group that matches the target bug. The child views a stimulus page of one or more pictures for a specified time and then selects the pictures from options on a response page. For picture items, the child selects the response option that is from the same category as two other depicted objects. For verbal items, the child reads two words that represent common objects or concepts and describes how they are similar. The child views two or three rows of pictures and selects one picture from each row to form a group with a common characteristic. Working within a specified time limit, the child scans two arrangements of objects (one random, one structured) and marks target objects. The child views one or more animal cards placed on a zoo layout for a specified time and then places each card in the previously viewed locations. Working within a specified time limit, the child assembles the pieces of a puzzle to create a representation of an identified object. For picture items, the child names the depicted object. For verbal items, the child defines words that are read aloud. Working within a specified time limit and using a key, the child marks shapes that correspond to pictured animals. For picture items, the child selects the response option that represents the best response to a general principle or social situation. For verbal items, the child answers questions based on his or her understanding of general principles and social situations. The child selects the response option that best represents the word the examiner reads aloud. The child names depicted objects. It best represents acquired knowledge, verbal reasoning, and verbal concept formation. It measures visual-spatial processing, part-whole relationship integration and synthesis, and visual-motor integration. It best represents inductive and fluid reasoning, broad visual intelligence, coceptual thinking, simultaneous processing, and classification ability. It measures visual and visual-spatial working memory and ability to withstand proactive interference. It best represents processing speed, especially quick scanning and discriminaion of simple visual information. It is the most reliable composite score. It includes vital information to general intellectual ability. It measures a child s receptive and expressive vocabulary acquisition. It offers an estimate of overall ability of children who have expressive issues (e.g., language disorder, autism spectrum disorder, Korean language learner). It offers an estimate of intellectual ability that is less influenced by working memory and processing speed. It measures working memory and processing speed. Note. BD = Block Design; IN = Information; MR = Matrix Reasoning; BS = Bug Search; PM = Picture Memory; SI = Similarities; PC = Picture Concepts; CA = Cancellation; ZL = Zoo Locations; OA = Object Assembly; VC = Vocabulary; AC = Animal Coding; CO = Comprehension; RV = Receptive Vocabulary; PN = Picture Naming; VCI = Verbal Comprehension ; VSI = Visual Spatial ; FRI = Fluid Reasoning ; WMI = Working Memory ; PSI = Processing Speed ; FSIQ = Full Scale IQ; VAI = Vocabulary Acquisition ; NVI = Nonverbal ; GAI = General Ability ; CPI = Cognitive Proficiency Table 2, 3. Table 2 (2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 ). 2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 600 9.58 (SD = 3.03) 9.25 (SD = 2.80) (t = 14.91,

161 Intellectual Characteristics of Korean Children Table 2 Subtest and Performance in the Younger Age Range According to Korean and American Norms Korean norm American norm Differences Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD t RV 9.58 3.03 9.25 2.80 0.33 0.54 14.91*** IN 10.43 2.94 10.03 2.54 0.40 1.20 8.11*** PN 10.21 3.28 10.02 3.23 0.20 0.61 7.77*** BD 10.45 2.95 11.37 3.02-0.92 0.65-34.75*** OA 9.79 3.32 11.30 3.16-1.51 0.70-52.68*** PM 10.04 3.66 10.24 3.23-0.20 0.71-6.95*** ZL 10.56 2.93 11.24 2.98-0.68 0.75-22.09*** VCI 101.85 14.63 98.48 11.92 3.37 4.42 18.66*** VSI 99.90 14.67 108.05 14.31-8.15 2.58-77.39*** WMI 102.81 16.74 104.64 15.20-3.63 1.83-12.36*** FSIQ 101.37 15.19 88.76 10.25 12.61 6.57 47.01*** VAI 100.24 15.54 97.79 13.78 2.45 2.90 20.67*** NVI 101.87 15.04 108.20 14.70-6.32 2.88-53.78*** GAI 101.09 14.77 103.96 13.16-2.87 3.52-19.96*** Note. N = 600. ***p <.001. p <.001)..,,.,,,.,,,,,.. 101.37 (SD = 15.19) 88.76 (SD = 10.25). Table 3 4 7 7 / 12,.,,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,,.. 101.63 (SD = 14.38), 97.69 (SD = 13.88). 사회인구학적변인에따른한국아동의 K-WPPSI-IV 수행 K-WPPSI-IV 2 6 / 12 7 7 / 12 3-way MANOVA,,, (3-way, 2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 : Wilk s lambda =.925, F =.799, ns; 4 7 7 / 12 : Wilk s lambda =.907, F = 1.043, ns), 2-way (Wilk s lambda =.888.981, F =.753 1.222, ns) K-WPPSI-IV.

Park and Lee 162 Table 3 Subtest and Performance in the Older Age Range According to Korean and American Norms Korean norm American norm Differences Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD t IN 10.57 2.88 9.01 2.85 0.03 0.92 56.53*** SI 10.06 2.89 9.29 2.29 0.77 0.85 29.93*** VC 9.94 3.17 8.60 2.57 1.33 0.93 47.71*** CO 10.11 2.90 9.92 2.53 0.18 0.78 7.73*** BD 10.62 3.24 12.77 3.12-2.15 0.73-98.10*** OA 10.69 2.81 11.65 2.42-0.96 0.80-39.74*** MR 10.31 3.07 11.01 2.95-0.70 0.60-38.57*** PC 10.06 3.33 9.75 3.16 0.31 0.62 16.60*** PM 10.23 2.84 10.48 2.63-0.25 0.58-14.19*** ZL 10.54 2.71 10.97 2.89-0.44 0.77-18.91*** BS 10.42 3.11 12.91 3.19-2.50 0.64-129.54*** CA 10.34 2.99 10.13 3.01 0.21 0.52 13.05*** AC 10.14 3.19 11.78 3.21-1.64 0.64-85.929*** RV 10.78 2.81 10.49 2.85 0.29 0.67 14.47*** PN 10.49 2.75 10.49 2.64 0.00 0.54-0.06 VCI 102.41 14.57 101.43 13.86 0.98 1.41 23.01*** VSI 103.08 14.76 104.10 14.52-1.03 0.41-83.45*** WMI 103.25 13.39 102.45 13.13 0.80 1.05 25.27*** PSI 102.62 14.51 102.48 14.97 0.14 0.78 6.10*** FRI 102.38 15.29 102.57 13.15-0.19 12.20-0.52 FSIQ 101.63 14.38 97.69 13.88 3.93 7.56 21.45*** VAI 104.63 13.94 103.44 12.87 1.19 1.28 30.67*** NVI 101.23 14.56 102.38 14.02-1.15 0.95-40.01*** GAI 102.02 14.53 102.33 13.50-0.31 1.22-8.40*** CPI 101.54 14.61 102.77 13.63-1.23 1.35-30.13*** Note. N = 1,100. ***p <.001. 지역에따른한국아동의 K-WPPSI-IV 수행 Table 4 2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 (106.01 [SD = 13.03]), (102.50 [SD = 14.99]), (99.51 [SD = 14.17]) (99.51 [SD = 15.74]), (98.24 [SD = 18.35]).,,,,,,,,,.. Table 5 4 7 7 / 12 (105.97 [SD = 14.45]), (102.69 [SD = 14.14]) (100.87 [SD = 13.49]), (100.68 [SD = 13.15]), (100.66 [SD = 13.91]).,,,,,,,,,,,,. 모의학력에따른한국아동의 K-WPPSI-IV 수행

163 Intellectual Characteristics of Korean Children Table 4 Subtest and Performance in the Younger Age Range According to Region Seoul a (n = 94) Gyeonggi b (n = 199) Gyeongsang c (n = 158) Honam d (n = 70) Gangwon & Chungcheong e (n = 79) Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD F Scheffé RV 10.39 2.90 9.52 2.92 9.26 2.98 8.59 3.06 10.28 3.17 4.69** a, e > d IN 10.73 2.50 10.46 2.72 10.27 3.41 10.26 3.10 10.43 2.88.42 PN 10.91 2.73 10.48 3.10 9.56 3.71 9.90 3.29 10.27 3.20 2.71* a > c BD 10.96 2.86 10.75 2.79 10.15 3.12 10.39 3.18 9.78 2.74 2.74* OA 10.64 2.99 10.21 3.18 9.40 3.61 8.73 3.38 9.44 3.01 4.66** a, b > d PM 10.83 3.22 10.16 3.66 9.89 3.49 10.13 3.79 9.06 4.20 2.69* e < a ZL 10.61 3.37 10.37 2.92 10.49 2.86 11.33 2.58 10.42 2.77 1.49 VCI 105.20 13.73 101.75 14.20 100.46 13.68 98.37 16.20 103.99 16.25 2.86* d < a VSI 103.94 13.58 102.01 14.66 97.82 14.07 96.57 17.23 96.89 12.97 5.18*** d. e < a WMI 105.40 16.28 102.60 16.64 102.08 16.30 105.50 17.03 99.34 17.74 1.26 FSIQ 106.01 13.03 102.50 14.99 99.51 14.17 98.24 18.35 99.51 15.74 3.98** c, d, e < a VAI 104.79 14.48 100.85 15.14 97.33 14.89 96.39 16.24 102.52 16.77 4.46** c, d < a NVI 105.63 13.71 102.95 15.09 100.31 14.33 101.41 17.52 98.23 14.58 2.56* c, d < a GAI 105.46 13.55 102.30 14.61 99.01 13.43 97.13 17.61 100.49 15.06 4.37** c, d < a Note. Wilk s lambda =.842, F = 1.781***. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.. Table 6 2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12,,,,,. Table 7 4 7 7 / 12,,,,,,. 성에따른한국아동의 K-WPPSI-IV 수행 K-WPPSI-IV, 2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 (Wilk s lambda =.995, F =.598, ns). 4 7 7 / 12 Table 8,,,,,.,,,..? K-WPPSI-IV 2 6 / 12 7 7 / 12.....

Park and Lee 164 Table 5 Subtest and Performance in the Older Age Range According to Region Seoul a (n = 168) Gyeonggi b (n = 388) Gyeongsang c (n = 287) Honam d (n = 127) Gangwon & Chungcheong e (n = 130) Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD IN 11.29 2.86 10.55 2.63 9.96 2.96 11.01 2.96 10.65 3.09 4.97** c < d, a SI 10.51 2.90 9.96 2.78 10.09 2.89 10.15 2.90 9.62 3.18 1.19 VC 10.47 3.36 10.01 3.06 9.41 3.03 9.85 3.28 10.27 3.29 2.58* c < a CO 10.67 2.77 10.32 2.86 9.46 2.99 9.86 2.82 10.41 2.78 5.99*** c < e, a BD 11.16 3.34 10.43 3.22 10.50 3.16 11.20 3.33 10.21 3.16 2.51* OA 10.83 3.20 10.81 2.66 10.45 2.91 10.87 2.67 10.52 2.63.97 MR 10.85 3.16 9.90 3.06 10.39 2.93 10.67 3.13 10.29 3.10 2.63* PC 10.52 3.52 10.03 3.12 9.86 3.47 10.28 3.28 9.77 3.43.84 PM 11.09 3.14 10.02 2.82 10.07 2.77 10.02 2.68 10.37 2.66 3.59** c, e < d ZL 10.80 2.83 10.51 2.61 10.26 2.92 11.17 2.11 10.28 2.81 2.92* c, e < d BS 10.67 3.27 10.49 3.09 10.53 3.08 9.83 3.36 10.21 2.67 1.62 F Scheffé CA 10.64 2.81 10.57 2.74 10.56 2.84 8.70 3.80 10.38 2.89 11.93*** d < a, b, c, e AC 10.34 3.10 10.14 3.16 10.43 3.47 9.59 2.98 9.77 2.84 1.79 RV 11.49 2.88 10.69 2.58 10.62 3.01 10.65 2.92 10.59 2.69 1.60 e < a PN 11.42 2.84 10.29 2.71 9.80 2.70 10.74 2.40 11.15 2.70 9.69*** e < b, c < a VCI 105.88 14.77 102.05 14.10 100.70 14.16 103.92 14.59 101.29 15.89 2.41* c < a VSI 105.11 15.98 102.86 14.28 102.00 15.05 105.30 14.37 101.31 13.90 1.85 WMI 106.76 14.09 102.45 13.03 101.89 13.95 104.54 11.93 102.86 12.94 1.67 c, b < a FRI 105.30 16.46 101.10 14.29 102.02 15.52 104.07 15.84 101.53 15.21 3.12* PSI 104.23 13.87 103.49 13.73 103.52 14.29 96.32 17.90 102.10 12.88 7.68*** d < a, b, c, e FSIQ 105.97 14.45 100.66 13.91 100.87 13.49 102.69 14.14 100.68 13.15 3.05* b, c, e < a VAI 109.58 14.62 103.74 13.08 102.11 14.24 105.04 13.18 106.05 13.98 5.61*** b, c, d < a NVI 105.11 15.23 100.12 14.27 100.78 14.41 101.71 15.46 100.08 13.25 2.26 b, e < a GAI 105.90 15.01 100.82 14.38 100.92 13.99 104.50 14.45 100.62 14.64 3.58** b, c, e < a CPI 104.77 15.35 101.64 14.38 101.33 14.97 98.05 14.45 100.94 12.89 2.99* d < a Note. Wilk s lambda =.800, F = 2.422***. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.,,,,,,.,,,,,,. 2. 4 7 7 / 12.,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,

165 Intellectual Characteristics of Korean Children Table 6 Subtest and Performance in the Younger Age Range According to Maternal Education Level,,,.. Less than 13 years (n = 242) More than 12 years (n = 358) Mean SD Mean SD RV 8.95 2.96 10.00 3.00 9.60** IN 9.99 3.15 10.72 2.76 8.04** PN 9.60 3.52 10.62 3.04 13.39*** BD 10.06 3.05 10.72 2.85 5.00* OA 9.60 3.40 9.91 3.26.00 PM 9.72 3.80 10.26 3.56 1.84 ZL 10.37 2.94 10.69 2.92 3.66 VCI 98.69 14.23 103.99 14.52 13.44*** VSI 98.17 14.58 101.06 14.64 1.91 WMI 101.24 17.22 103.87 16.35 3.63 FSIQ 98.59 15.43 103.25 14.75 7.64** VAI 96.57 15.48 102.72 15.10 17.33*** NVI 100.02 15.42 103.13 14.67 3.85 GAI 98.23 14.71 103.02 14.51 8.48** Note. Wilk s lambda =.949, F = 2.198**. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.. 101.37 (SD = 15.19) 88.76 (SD = 10.25) 101.63 (SD = 14.38), 97.69 (SD = 13.88)..... Cho Park (2008) 1 42 F Table 7 Subtest and Performance in the Older Age Range According to Maternal Education Level Less than 13 years (n = 462). Chung, Rhee Park (1993).. More than 12 years (n = 638) Mean SD Mean SD F IN 9.86 2.82 11.09 2.82 30.26*** SI 9.56 2.96 10.42 2.79 15.93*** VC 9.59 3.10 10.19 3.20 7.39** CO 9.81 2.96 10.32 2.83 2.26 BD 9.97 3.07 11.09 3.28 22.88*** OA 10.35 2.89 10.94 2.73 6.88** MR 10.10 2.97 10.45 3.13 3.27 PC 9.41 3.46 10.53 3.16 24.07*** PM 9.94 2.86 10.45 2.81 2.44 ZL 10.29 2.73 10.71 2.69 1.52 BS 10.02 3.03 10.70 3.13 6.00* CA 10.28 3.05 10.38 2.95.03 AC 9.87 3.23 10.33 3.14 2.72 RV 10.28 2.83 11.14 2.74 15.65*** PN 10.03 2.71 10.82 2.73 12.94*** VCI 98.82 14.59 105.01 14.01 30.94*** VSI 100.15 14.30 105.20 14.73 21.11*** WMI 101.60 13.55 104.45 13.16 17.90*** FRI 99.86 15.30 104.20 15.04 3.23 PSI 101.32 14.59 103.56 14.38 2.62 FSIQ 98.30 14.02 104.28 13.32 30.31*** VAI 101.76 13.86 106.71 13.63 20.72*** NVI 98.06 14.51 103.54 14.16 24.75*** GAI 98.44 14.49 104.62 14.01 33.64*** CPI 99.68 14.68 102.88 14.42 4.15* Note. Wilk s lambda =.939, F = 2.748***. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.

Park and Lee 166 Table 8 Subtest and Performance in the Older Age Range According to Gender Boys (n = 550) Girls (n = 550) Mean SD Mean SD IN 10.68 3.03 10.47 2.72.49 SI 9.90 2.96 10.22 2.82 6.32* VC 10.08 3.28 9.80 3.05.05 CO 10.03 2.86 10.19 2.93 2.53 BD 10.82 3.40 10.43 3.07 3.12 OA 10.71 2.87 10.67 2.76.12 MR 10.30 3.17 10.32 2.96.04 PC 10.05 3.37 10.07 3.29.14 PM 10.05 2.89 10.42 2.79 7.04** ZL 10.52 2.78 10.56 2.64.34 BS 10.03 3.09 10.81 3.08 14.21*** CA 10.14 2.99 10.54 2.97 4.03* AC 9.71 3.05 10.57 3.26 15.66*** RV 10.56 2.92 11.00 2.68 5.04* PN 10.34 2.73 10.64 2.76 3.33 VCI 102.27 15.23 102.55 13.90 1.16 VSI 103.73 15.61 102.42 13.85 1.91 WMI 102.63 13.51 103.87 13.26.11 FRI 102.32 15.69 102.43 14.90 4.37* PSI 100.97 14.37 104.27 14.47 12.05*** FSIQ 101.22 14.56 102.31 13.25 3.16* VAI 103.50 14.16 105.76 13.63 6.06* NVI 100.65 15.13 101.82 13.95 2.42 GAI 102.25 15.09 101.79 13.95.00 CPI 100.04 14.83 103.04 14.24 12.17** Note. Wilk s lambda =.943, F = 2.548***. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001. (Lee et al., 2015),. K-WPPSI-IV WPPSI-IV. Wechsler WPPSI-IV... F K-WPPSI-IV..,. (Raiford et al., 2014; Shaffer & Kipp, 2014; Song, 1995).,,,,,. 4 7 7 / 12,,,,,,. Cho Park (2008) 1 42 K-BSID-II (Korean Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second edition). (Shaffer & Kipp, 2014). (Shaffer & Kipp, 2014). 2. K-BSID-II (Cho & Park, 2008). K-WPPSI-IV (Raiford et al., 2014; Wechsler, 2012).,,,,,,,,.,,

167 Intellectual Characteristics of Korean Children. WPPSI-IV (Wechsler, 2012).,.. K-WPPSI-IV. Wechsler,.,,,. K-ABC (Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children; Moon, 2014), (Park, 2015) (Feuerstein, Feuerstein, Falik, & Rand, 2002; Sternberg, 1997). Notes This article was presented at the 2016 Annual Spring Conference of the Korean Association of Child Studies. Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. In English References Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factoranalytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press. Carroll, J. B. (1997). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 122-130). New York: Guilford. Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem, Israel: International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential. Horn, J. L., & Blankson, A. N. (2012). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, test, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 73-98). New York: Guilford. Raiford, S. E., Coalson, D. L., & Engi, M. D. (2014) WPPSI- IV score differences across demographic groups. In S. E. Raiford & D. L. Coalson (Eds.), Essentials of WPPSI-IV assessment (pp. 215-236). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Shaffer, D., & Kipp, K. (2014). Developmental psychology: Childhood and adolescence (9th ed.). Stamford, CT: Wadworth. Sternberg, R. (1997). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Plume. Thurlow, M. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1979). Current assessment and decision making practices in model LD programs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(4), 15-24. doi:10.2307/1510821 Ward, L. C., Bergman, M. A., & Hebert, K. R. (2012). WAIS- IV subtest covariance structure: Conceptual and statistical considerations. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 328-340. doi:10.1037/a0025614 Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Wechsler, D. (2012). Technical and interpretative manual: WPPSI- IV. New York: Pearson. In Korean Cho, B., & Park, H. (2008). The standardization study (1) of Korean Bayley Scales of Infant Development (K-BSID- II): Analyses of Korean infant s performance of K-BSID-II in terms of demographical variables. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 191-206. Retrieved from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/article/node06374994 Chung, M. J., Rhee, U. H., & Park, K. J. (1993). A preliminary study on the standardization of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for Korean infants. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 14(1), 5-21. Retrieved from http://www.kiss. kstudy.com

Park and Lee 168 Hwang, M., Park, H., & Lee, K. (2015). Correlation between K-WPPSI-IV and K-BSID-II performances. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention, 6(1), 1-17. Retrieved from http://www.newnonmun.com/article=192839 Lee, K., Park, H., & Lee, S. (2015). A pilot study for the Korean- WPPSI-IV. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 20(1), 811-832. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com Moon, S. B. (2014). Korean Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II. Seoul: Hakjisa. Park, H. (2015). Korean Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-II. Seoul: Mindpress. Park, H., Lee, K., & Ahn, D. (2016). Korean Wechsler Preschool & Primary Scale of Intelligence-IV. Seoul: Hakjisa. Park, H., Lee, K., Lee, S., & Park, M. (2016). A study on the standardization of K-WPPSI-IV: Analyses of reliability and validity. Korean Journal of Childcare & Education, 12(4), 111-130. doi:10.14698/jkcce.2016.12.04.111 Park, H., Seo, Y., & Lee, J. (2015). A study on the concurrent validities of K-WPPSI-IV. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 36(1), 65-83. doi:10.5723/kjcs.2015.36.1.65 Song, M. J. (1995). Developmental psychology. Seoul: Hakjisa. ORCID Hyewon Park http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2074-6128 KyungOk Lee http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6270-2145 Received October 31, 2016 Revision received December 20, 2016 Accepted December 22, 2016