: * ** (*, **. :., 2 00 1, 6, 2, 4 4 7-4 62. -,, -. 4-7 51. 4.,.,.,..,,,..., (Shantz, 1987.,, (Cummings, 1994; Furman & McQuiad, 1992..,..,, 447
,,, (Cicirelli, 1995.., (Rinaldi & Howe, 1998; Siddiqui & Ross, 1999., (Shantz & Hobart, 1989; Vandell & Bailey, 1992.,. (Bank & Kahn, 1982; Faber & Mazlish, 1987.,. (Washo, 1992..,,. Shantz (1987,.,.,,.. (Perlman & Ross, 1997,.,,. 448
:..,...,.,,., Pepler, Abramovitch & Corter (1981,...,,,.,.. 1.? 2.? 2-1.? 2-2.? 3.? 449
. 1. 3-7 51. 51,, <- 1>. <- 1> ( - - 12 6.0 4.0 2.0-14 7.0 4.7 2.3-10 7.1 5.6 1.9-15 7.1 5.0 2.1 2.. (,,,.., (:,,,,,,. 12.,,.,,.,,. 10.,. 450
:. 5.,.,. 5.. Eisenberg & Garvey (1981.,,,.,. 145.. Perlman & Ross (1997. <- 2>.... Siddiqui & Ross (1999. <- 3>. 451
<- 2> : :,, : ( : : : ( : ( : : ( :! : : : :,... : : : (? : : : ( :,,,! : : : : ( : (? : : (,, :,!! : ( 452
: <- 3> :,,?, : (,... :. (....,.,? : ( :!! : : : ( : :, (? :, ( : (... :. : (. : ( ( : : ( : ( :, : ( : : : : ( :. : ( 453
3.. ( 3 8. 2 7( 1. 37 Kramer (1995.., 12, 10, 5, 5.........,,. 20, 95 %, 90 %, 93 %. 454
:. 1. 51 23.5 % 12. 12-5(41.67 %, - 3(25.0 %, - 3(25.0 %, -1(8.3 %.. 39 1451 3.72. <- 4>.,.. <- 4> ( - - 9 33 3.6-9 31 3.4-7 31 4.4-14 50 3.6 39 145 3.8. (58, 40 %, (42, 28.9 %, (23, 15.9 %, (22, 15.2 %.. 1 4.8, 4.2, 4.6, 4.4.. 455
2. 145847. 412, 435. <- 5>..,.,,,.,. <- 5> 50 (12.1 (% 102 (24.8 54 (13.1 8 (1.9 214 (51.9 10 (2.4 59 (14.3 13 (3.2 44 (10.7 11 (2.7 8 (1.9 23 (5.6 30 (7.3 198 (48.1 412 45 (10.3 89 (20.5 26 (6.0 4 (0.9 164 (37.7 15 (3.4 76 (17.5 1 (0.2 22 (5.1 57 (13.1 11 (2.5 39 (9.0 50 (11.5 271 (62.3 435. 20 % <- 6>., <- 6>,,.,,,,.,,,.,. 456
: <- 6> (% 5(10.0 8(7.8 1(1.9 1(12.5 1(10.0 6(10.2 1(7.7 3(6.8 1(9.1 1(4.4 2(6.7 32 12(24.0 35(34.3 7(13.0 3(37.5 10(17.0 2(15.4 4(9.1 3(10.0 76 7(6.9 3(5.6 2(3.4 1(7.7 1(2.3 2(18.2 1(4.4 17 4(8.0 14(13.7 16(29.6 1(12.5 1(10.0 3(5.1 2(4.6 1(4.4 1(3.3 41 2(4.0 3(2.9 3(30.0 1(1.7 2(4.6 3(13.0 4(13.3 17 8(16.0 10(9.8 10(18.5 3(30.0 13(22.0 3(23.1 5(11.4 1(9.1 1(12.5 4(17.4 1(3.3 62 1(2.0 2(2.0 5(8.5 10(22.7 1(9.1 2(25.0 2(8.7 2(6.7 25 8(16.0 4(3.9 6(11.1 1(12.5 7(11.9 3(23.1 3(6.8 1(9.1 2(25.0 6(26.1 12(40.0 53 1(1.0 1(12.5 1(1.7 1(2.3 2(25.0 2(6.7 8 3(6.0 5(4.9 1(1.9 1(12.5 8(13.6 1(7.7 1(2.3 1(9.1 2(8.7 3(10.0 26 7(14.0 13(12.8 10(18.5 2(20.0 3(5.1 50 102 54 8 10 59 2(15.4 12(27.3 4(36.4 1(12.5 3(13.0 57 13 44 11 8 23 30 412. 20 % <- 7>., <- 7>,.,,.,,,,.,,., 457
,. <- 7> (% 6(13.3 10(11.2 1(25.0 1(3.8 7(9.2 1(4.5 5(8.8 4(10.3 8(16.0 43 16(35.6 24(27.1 18(23.7 7(26.9 1(6.7 2(9.1 9(15.8 2(18.1 5(12.8 8(16.0 92 13(14.6 2(50.0 3(6.7 2(7.7 2(13.2 10(13.3 7(12.2 1(2.6 6(12.0 47 5(11.1 8(9.0 6(23.2 2(12.2 2(2.6 4(18.2 9(15.8 1(2.6 2(4.0 40 1(1.1 5(6.6 4(7.0 1(9.1 3(7.7 8(16.0 22 7(15.6 13(14.6 4(15.5 2(13.2 14(18.4 5(22.7 2(3.5 13(33.2 1(2.0 59 1(25.0 2(4.4 4(4.5 1(3.8 1(1.3 1(4.5 4(7.0 1(2.6 15 11(14.5 1(2.2 1(1.1 3(11.5 1(6.7 7(31.8 2(3.5 1(9.1 3(7.7 9(18.0 39 1(2.2 2(2.2 1(3.8 1(6.7 2(2.6 2(9.1 4(8.0 13 3(5.3 2(18.2 2(5.1 7 4(4.5 1(3.8 1(6.7 3(3.9 12(21.1 1(9.1 4(10.3 3(6.0 29 4(8.9 9(10.1 5(33.3 3(3.9 1 4(36.4 2(5.1 1(2.0 29 45 89 26 4 15 76 1 22 57 11 39 50 3. (45 %, (26.4 %, (23.1 %, (5.5 %.. 458
:.,,,.,, 1/4 3.8. 30 3-6 (Dunn & Munn, 1987; Ross et al., 1994.,, -. Ambrovitch et al. (1986 Pelper, Abramovitch & Corter (1981.,.,,.,.,,.,.,,,,.,.,,,,..,.,. 459
. (Ross et al., 1994.,., 20 %,,,..,,.,,. (Martin & Ross, 1995.,. Perman & Ross (1997,.. Stoneman & Brody (199362-78 %. Siddiqui & Ross (1999..., 4.,,..,.. 460
:,. 461
Abramovitch, R., Corter, C., Pelper, D. J. & Stanhope, L. (1986. Sibling and peer interaction: A final follow - up and a comparison. Child D evelop m ent, 57, 217-229. Bank, S. P. & Kahn, M. D. (1982. The S ibling B ond. New York: Basic Books. Cicirelli. V. G. (1995. S ibling R elationship A cross the L if e Span. New York: Plenum Press. Cummings, E. M. (1994. Marital conflict and children s functioning. Social D evelopm ent, 3, 16-36. Dunn, J. & Munn, P. (1987. Development of justification in disputes with mother and sibling. D evelopm ental Psychology, 23, 791-798. Eisenberg, A. & Garvey, C. (1981. Children s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. D iscourse P rocesses, 4, 149-170. Faber, A. & Mazlish, E. (1987. S ibling Without R ivalry : H ow to H elp Your Children L ive Tog ether so You Can L ive, Too. New York: Avon Books. Furman, W. & McQuiad, E. L. (1992. Intervention programs for the management of conflict. In C. U. Shantz & W. W. Hartup (Eds., Conflict in Child and A dolescent D evelop m ent. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kramer, L. (1995. Sibling relationships : An interview with Laurie Kramer [Online]. Available: http: // www.cpirc.org/ pnwes/ 1999/ pnews 599/ lnt599.html [1999, May]. Martin, J. L. & Ross, H. S. (1995. The development within sibling conflict. Early E ducation and D evelopm ent, 6, 335-358. Pelper, D., Abramovitch, R. & Corter, C. (1981. Sibling interaction in the home: A longitudinal study. Child D evelop m ent, 52, 1344-1347. Perlman, M. & Ross, H. S. (1997. The benefits of parent intervention in children s disputes : An examination of concurrent changes in children s fighting styles. Child D evelopm ent, 64(4, 690-700. Rinaldi, C. & Howe, N. (1998. Siblings reports of conflict and the quality of their relationships. M errill- Palm er Quarterly, 44(3, 404-422. Ross, H., Filyer, R., Lollis, S. P., Perlman, M. & Martin, J. L. (1994. Administring justice in the family. A m erican Psycholog ical A ssociation, 8(3, 254-273. Shantz, C. U. (1987. Conflicts between children. Child D evelop m ent, 58, 283-305. Shantz, C. U. & Hobart, C. J. (1989. Social conflict and development: Peer and siblings. In T. Berndt & G. W. Ladd (Eds., P eer R elationship s in Child D evelopm ent (pp. 71-94. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Siddiqui, A. & Ross, H. S (1999. How do siblings, conflicts end? Early E ducation & D evelop m ent, 10(3, 315-330. Stoneman, Z. & Brody, G. H. (1993. Sibling temperaments, conflict, warmth, and role asymmetry. Child D evelop m ent, 64, 1786-1800. Vandell, D. & Bailey, M. (1992. Conflicts between siblings. In C. Shantz & W. Hartup (Eds., 462
: Conf lict in Child and A dolescent D evelopm ent (pp. 242-270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Washo, C. A. (1992. Parental strategies for managing sibling conflict. Unpublished Master s Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. AB ST RACT T he Char act eristics of Con flict s B et w een Youn g Siblin g s P ark, S o R a (Si- Yeon Kindergarten K im, H e ejin * (Dept. of Early Childhood Education, Ewha Womans University The purpose of this study was to examine the processes of sibling conflicts. The subjects of this study were 51 sibling pairs whose ages were between four and seven. The siblings were asked to complete 4 tasks together and the conflicts occurring during the tasks were observed. The results of the study can be summarized as follows: First, sibling conflicts were observed most frequently in the male- girl siblings. Second, the strategies used by a sibling were related to the strategies employed by the other sibling. Third, the sibling conflicts were more or less resolved when submission was admitted by one party. Desirable directions for parental intervention in sibling conflicts are discussed. * e-mail: heejin88@mm.ewha.ac.kr 463