i Ⅰ. 1 1. 1 2. 7 Ⅱ. 9 1. 9 2. 25 Ⅲ. 34 1. 34 2. 40 3. 58 4. 83 5. 91 Ⅳ. - 69 1. 96 2. 1 :,, 98 3. 2 : 172 4. FGI(Focused Group Interview) 190 Ⅴ. 201 1. 201 2. 246 - iii -
Ⅵ. 257 1. 257 2. 262 3. 271 4. 282 5. 289 297 303 1., 303 2. 315 3. 1, 2 339 4. FGI 368 - iv -
< 1-1> (2001, 2007, 2013) 2 < 1-2> (2012) 3 < 2-1> 41 < 2-2> 91 < 2-3> - 2 2 < 2-4> 52 < 2-5> 62 < 2-6> (2012) 7 2 < 2-7> 82 < 2-8> (1) 9 2 < 2-9> 03 < 2-10> 0 3 < 2-11> 3 3 < 3-1>,, 93 < 3-2> 04 < 3-3> 14 < 3-4> 24 < 3-5> (1, 2012 ) 7 4 < 3-6> 94 < 3-7> 05 < 3-8> 15 < 3-9> 1 2 5 < 3-10> 5 5 < 3-11> 2008 2012 8 5 < 3-12> 60 < 3-13> 2 6 < 3-14> 3 6 < 3-15>, (1= - v -
,..., 3=,..., 5= ) 56 < 3-16> (1=, 2=, 3=, 4=, 5= ) 8 6 < 3-17> (1=, 2=, 3=, 4=, 5= ) 17 < 3-18> (1=, 2=, 3=, 4=, 5= ) 3 7 < 3-19> 6 7 < 3-20> 8 7 < 3-21> (%) 1 8 < 3-22> ( 前 ), 3 8 < 3-23> 84 < 3-24> 35 ( ) 86 < 3-25> 87 < 4-1>,, 79 < 4-2> 99 < 4-3> 10 < 4-4> 101 < 4-5> 103 < 4-6> ( ) 105 < 4-7> ( ) 106 < 4-8> ( ) 108 < 4-9> 109 < 4-10> ( ) 110 - vi -
< 4-11> ( ) 111 < 4-12> ( ) 112 < 4-13> ( ) 113 < 4-14> ( ) 114 < 4-15> ( ) 115 < 4-16> ( ) 116 < 4-17> ( ) 116 < 4-18> (žž) 118 < 4-19> (žž) 119 < 4-20> 120 < 4-21> ( ) 12 1 < 4-22> (ž žž) 123 < 4-23> ( ) 126 < 4-24> ( ) 127 < 4-25> ( ) 129 < 4-26> ( ) 130 < 4-27> ( ) 132 - vii -
< 4-28> ( ) 133 < 4-29> 135 < 4-30> ( ) 135 < 4-31> (žžž) 137 < 4-32> () ( ) 138 < 4-33> () ( ) 138 < 4-34> ( ž ) 140 < 4-35> ( ) 141 < 4-36> ( ) 141 < 4-37> ( ž) 143 < 4-38> ( / ž) 144 < 4-39> (, / ž) 145 < 4-40> ( / ž) 146 < 4-41> ( / ž) 147 < 4-42> ( / ž) 148 < 4-43> ( / ž) 149 < 4-44> ( / ž) 150 < 4-45> ( / ž) 151 - viii -
< 4-46> ( / ž) 152 < 4-47> (/ / ( ž) 153 < 4-48> ( / ž) 154 < 4-49> (žžž) 65 1 < 4-50> (žžž) 75 1 < 4-51> (žžž) 159 < 4-52> (ž žž) 160 < 4-53> 163 < 4-54> 164 < 4-55> 165 < 4-56> 16 < 4-57> 16 < 4-58> 167 < 4-59> 169 < 4-60> ( ) 170 < 4-61> 172 < 4-62> 2 17 < 4-63> 2 182 < 4-64> 2 185 < 4-65> FGI 191 < 4-66> FGI 192 < 5-1> 202 < 5-2> 205 < 5-3> 205 - ix -
< 5-4> 208 < 5-5> 1 210 < 5-6> 1 212 < 5-7> 214 < 5-8> (M) 82 2 < 5-8> (, 2013 6) 232 < 5-9> 235 < 5-10> 242 < 5-11> 1 Yonsei RC 102 250 < 5-12> 2013 253 < 6-1> 1 (2013) 362 < 6-2> 264 < 6-3> (2014) 56 2 < 6-4> 26 < 6-5> (2013) 76 2 < 6-6> 268 < 6-7> 270 < 6-8> 292 < 1>, (1=,..., 3=,..., 5= ) 303 < 2> (1=, 2=, 3=, 4=, 5= ) 304 < 3> (1=, 2=, 3=, 4=, 5= ) 305 < 4> (1=, 2=, 3=, 4=, 5= ) 80 3 < 5> 31 < 6> 313 < 7> 313 - x -
< 1-1> (2001-2013) 1 < 1-2> (2001-2013) 2 < 1-3> 3 < 2-4> 27 < 3-1>,, 1980 2013(: ) 35 < 3-2> OECD, 2013(: OECD Statistics) 35 < 3-3> 45 < 3-4> 75 < 4-1> 178 < 4-2> 179 < 4-3> 180 < 4-4> -- 181 < 4-5> 183 < 4-6> 184 < 4-7> 186 < 4-8> 187 < 4-9> 188 < 5-1> 2013 203 < 5-2> 203 < 5-3> 204 - xi -
< 5-4> 206 < 5-5> 206 < 5-6> 207 < 5-7> 209 < 5-8> 1 21 < 5-9> 213 < 5-10> 234 < 5-11> (2013) 632 < 5-12>, (2013 9) 732 < 5-13> 6 () ()%, 2013 9 ) 238 < 5-14> (2013) 239 < 5-15> (2012 ) 240 < 6-1> 294
,. -.,.. 1, 2. 3 4 1,2 FGI. 5. 6.,,,.,. - (, 2013), (, 2013). (, 2012), - xiii -
(, 2012,, 2012), (, 2012). -, ( (2013)), (, 2013),, 2012).,.,.,. - (39.0%), (33.0%) (, 2012). (2012). 100. (31.8%), (21.2%) (, 2012).,. - xiv -
,. 20~24 25~29. 35 85% 300,..,,... -. -. -. - xv -
-, 50,. -,,,.,.. -,,,,. 1 280,,.,,. - 2 600.. - FGI 10 ( :,, ). - xvi -
(76.5%), (67.6%), (35.8%), (30.8%). 63.2%, 70%. -..., /. 10~99,,. -,. 10,,,. -,,. - xvii -
70%,.,. - (90% ), (40%) (60%~70%).,.,.,. -, 40%, 60%,. -,.,.,. - xviii -
. -,. -...,.. (NEET). -.. - xix -
99% 70%.,,... - (STP),.,,.. - PPO,. - Job Shadow. - 14~16 work-related learning., / (MBTI), (MMPI). - xx -
,..,..,. -,,.. - -,. - xxi -
-,..,.. (governance). - xxii -
- xxiii -
OECD. 3~4%. 60%, 1).. :,,. 1) (discouraged workers) (marginally attached workers). (2005),, <> 2005 1. 2005 pp.35-44,. (2008),,, (KEIS2),.. - 1 -
:,,. 1) :,,. - 2012 (20~24, 25~29) OECD 10%. OECD. - 2 -
: OECD Statistics(http://stats.oecd.org, 2012),,. - 90% 300. : (-). :, 2014 6, 20~28. :,. - 300 (2.3%) (3.8%) 5~9 (6.1%) 10~29 (4.3%). - 3 -
(decent job). (2010) 2). -.. -. ( ),. -... - 2013. 2) (2010).. 10-13. ㅎ. pp.1~253. - 4 -
-,. -,. -,,. -,. -,. -. - 5 -
... - 6 -
. - 1 -. - 2., -,,,,. - 3.. - 4. 2 FGI(Focused Group Interview, ). 1 2. - FGI 8( ).. - 7 -
,. - 5.. 6,,,. - 8 -
,. (2009) 3),,.. (2010) 4), 30.. 3) (2009). Mismatch. 2009. pp.176~192. 4) (2010).. 10-13.. pp.1~253. - 9 -
(2012) 5) 1~7 200,,, 5.. -. (2012) 6)., 4.,. (2013) 7).., 10. (, ). 5) (2012).. 2012-38.. pp.1~227. 6) (2012).. The HRD Review. 2012 3. pp.6~35. 7) (2013). :.. pp.1~170. - 10 -
(2010) 8) 150.,, 4. 4. (2012) 9) 1995..,.. (2014) 10)..,,,,,,.,,. 8) (2010).. 2011-04.. pp.1~192. 9) (2012).,. 2012-56.. pp.1~75. 10) (2014)..,.. pp.96~111. - 11 -
. -, ( ),,. (2013) 11).. -. (, ). -. -,.. 11) (2013)... pp.1~201. - 12 -
-,,. (2011) 12) ( 19.2%, 18.2%), ( 22.8%, 17.8%)). (< 2-1> ) 12) (2011).. 2011.. pp.27~54. - 13 -
: (2013). - 14 -
-,,..,,... (2012) 13),,,,.,,,,,., (2013) 14),.,,. 13) (2012).. &. 49.. pp.1~25. 14), (2013).. The HRD Review. 2013 11.. pp.88~99-15 -
. -,,.,,,.,,,. - 3 ( 先 ).,, ( 超 ),, DB,. (2012) 15),,. 3D. 15) (2012)... pp.1~149. - 16 -
-., -.,. -. - 2010,,...,,,., (2013) 16),,.,. 16), (2013).. pp.1~30. - 17 -
-, (, ).. -,. -,.,.. (2012) 17), (69.1%). (wait unemployment). 17) (2013)... pp.1~20. - 18 -
: (2013).. -. 4~50.. -,.. 104.6%, 64.2%.,,,. - 19 -
- 60%. ( 50, 3 50, 6 50 ),... -,,,,...,., (2013) 18),,... 18) ž(2013)..,.. pp.5~26. - 20 -
- 20~24 15~19., ( 先 ).,,,.,,. - 25~29.. ILO(2013) 19),. 15~29 30 2008.,. 19) International Labour Organization(2013), Global Employment Trends For Youth 2013 : A generation at risk, International Labour Office(ILO). - 21 -
- 22 -
- 23 -
- 24 -
-.,,.. : :,. - 25 -
,,. : (2013.10),.. (2014. 6) 87 (90) 92.5%.(< 2-5>) OECD Statistics(2012) 2012 20-24 43.2%, OECD 55.2%. - 90% 300. (37.6%),,, (21.7%), (35.4%). - (20-24) 48.9% OECD (50.6%) 39.1% OECD (59.8%) 56.8% OECD (39.7%). 25-29 70.4% OECD (80.1%).(< 2-8>) - 26 -
:, 2014 6, 20-28. ( : ). : (-). : ( / ) 100. :,. : OECD Statistics(http://stats.oecd.org, 2012),,. - (2009 2012, 300 321 ) 10%. 20)21) 20) (2009),, 2009 3. 21) (2012),, 2012 4. - 27 -
: (2009, 2012) ( : 300 321). - 70% (2012). (2012) 80%. 22),. - 92.5% 300. (1 2 2-1) 50% (, 2014). - (24.8%) (19.7%). (< 2-10>). 300 (, 2014). 22) (2012). (1929). 2012 6. pp.1~53. - 28 -
(2014.6), 1. ( :, %). 1:,,. 2-1: 1. 2-2: 1-2. 3: 2-10 /. 4: 10. [ ]. - IT (39.0%), (31.3%), (21.3%), (4.5%), (4.0%). IT (52.7%) (36.1%), (8.3%) (2.5),. (reservation wage) ().. - 29 -
- (2012) (46.3%), (17.1%), (15.9%), (12.8%). - (2012) (39.0%) (33.0%), (17.0%). (2012). 100. - 2,000~2,500 (47. 3%), 2,500~3,000 (29.0%), 1,500~2,000 (12.8%). 3,500 (34.3%) 2,500~3,000 (21.8%), 2,000~2,500 (22.1%) (, 2012). (2012). ( :, % ) - 30 -
- 90.2%. 72.2% 83.3% 10% (, 2012).. - (2012) (84.1%), (56.4%), (40.8%), (12.5%). (75.6%), (43.3%), (18.0%). 4.0%, 2.1%. - 77.6%, (82.9%), (57.0%), (54. 2%). (79.0%), (73. 2%), (75.3%) (, 2012). -. (2012) (31.8%) (21.2%).,. - 31 -
- (42.8%), (23.8%) (20.4%) (, 2012). - < 2-13> () ()(33.2%), (25.2%), (22.2%).. 44.8%, 72.0% (, 2012). - 18.8% 81.2%. (36.2%), (35.1%), (21.3%), (6.4%), (39.7%), (29.8%), (19.4%), (6.6%) (, 2012). -.. - 32 -
(2012). - 33 -
< 3-1> 1980 20 29 1997, 2000. - 15 70% 75%. - 20 29 1980 78%, 1997 72%, 2013 56% 1990. 1990 25 25 NEET( Not in Education, Employment, or Training ). - 15 1980 72%, 1997 74%, 2013 71%. - < 3-2> 20 29 OECD. 2013 20 24 OECD 21%p 25 29 10%p. - 34 -
- 35 -
30 20 29 2000. - 15 1997 1980 40% 10%p 50%. - 20 29 1980 41%, 1997 57%, 2013 58%.,,. - 15 1980 41%, 1997 49%, 2013 49% 20. 30. - < 3-2> 20 29 OECD OECD.,. -,. - 36 -
- 2000 20 30. - 20 24. 2000 20 24 ( ) 25 29. - 2013 8 20 24 24%, 24%, 44% 25 29 57%, 15%, 20%. - 2013 8 20 24 38%, 17%, 40% 25 29 58%, 11%, 24%. < 3-1> 35 85% 300. - 2013 8 20 24 52% 10 5.5% 300 20 24 50% 10 9% 300. - 37 -
- 25 29 10 40% 300 13%. 30 34 45% 10 18% 300, 40% 10 13% 300. - 10 5. - 38 -
: 8. - 39 -
2007 2012 1 6. 2012 20 34( 1978 1992). :, 2012. - 40 -
:, 2012. < 3-2> < 3-3> 2012 ( ) 20% 40%. - 34% 35%. - 41 -
- 51%, 47%. - 42 -
- 43 -
:, *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1. :, 2012. - 44 -
< 3-4>,,. - 4,,,,,. -,,,. - 4 17%p, 4 31%p. - (30 70%) (10% ) 7%p (70% ) 10%p. -,. - 45 -
- 1 1%p 1 0.4%p. -. 1 2,001 4,000 6,001 1 10%p 1 1 19%p.. - 46 -
:, 2012. - 47 -
< 3-5>,,. -. 10%. 2007 2012. - 2012 1. 2007 2012 36% 54%,,. - 48 -
:, 2007 2012. < 3-6>,. - 3 1, 5 1. - 49 -
-,,.. :. :, 2008 2012. 2008 2012 < 3-7>,,. - 50 -
-,,,,. -. :, 2007 2012. - 51 -
2007 2012 < 3-8>. :, 2008 2011. - 52 -
60%. - < 3-9> 10%, 6% 8%, 2. - 30%, 65% 75%. < 3-3> (39%), (18%), (17%). (,, ) 23%. - 53 -
:, 2011. - 54 -
:, 2008 2011. - 55 -
. - < 3-10> 60%. - 65% TV. 2%. - 2 3%. 6:4. - 60% 70%. - 56 -
:, 2011. < 3-4> (45%) (22%). (16%) (8%). - 57 -
2008 2012 5. - (300 ) (300 ). - 36 (25 29, 30 34, 35 44, 45 54) (,, ). - 25 55. :, 2008 2012. - 58 -
- < 3-11> 5 6, 2 4, 1.5 2. - (1 9, 10 49, 50 99, 100 299, 300 999, 1000 ).. - 59 -
:. 2008 2012. - 60 -
< 3-12> 35. - 55%. - 20% 14%. -, 8%. (54%) (23%), (54%) (12%),, (8%) (8%). - 61 -
:, 2012. 2012 < 3-13>. -. - 62 -
- (< 3-6> ),. :, 2008 2012. < 3-14> 60%, 26% 50% 24%. - 10 10% 100 299 40%. - 63 -
- 10 60% 100 299 40%. (),,,, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. < 3-15> -- 3. - 3 (). - 25-29,. - 35-44. -,. - 64 -
: * 5%. :, 2008 2012. - 65 -
- 300 300 25-29 30-34 5%. - 35.,,. < 3-16>. - (1), (2), (3) (), (4) (), (5) (). -,,,, 1 5., 3 3. - 66 -
-. - 3() 3.5 3.5. -.. -,.,.. -.. - 67 -
: * 5%. :, 2008 2012. - 68 -
(3) () (4) ( ).. (5) () 3.4 3.7.. -. - 30-34 3.08. -.. - (1), (2) - 69 -
, (3), (4), (5),,,,. - 1 5 3 3. < 3-17>. - 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.8.. - 25-29, 30-34.. - 70 -
: * 5%. :, 2008 2012. - 71 -
. -.. -,,,,,,,, (1), (2), (3), (4), (5)... - 25 29 -. - 72 -
- 73 -
: * 5%. :, 2008 2012. - 74 -
- 35. -.,,. -. - 35 25-29. -,.. - 35. - 75 -
- -. :, 2008 2012. - 76 -
- < 3-19>.,,, 1/3. 30%. - 2012 ( ),,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,,,. 25 29,, -. ( ) 50 45 54 -,. - 77 -
: * 5%. :, 2008 2012. - 78 -
80 90% 90%. -. - 10%p 10%p...? (1), (2), (3), (4),, (5), (6).,,,. -,, 50%.,. - 79 -
- 35. - 35. -,. - 20% 10%.... - 80 -
- 81 -
: * 5%. :, 2008 2012. - 82 -
2008 2012. - 36 (25 29, 30 34, 35 44, 45 54) (,, ). : 6,703. :, 2008~2012. < 3-22> 5, 1 10%.,. - 25 29 19% 45 54 7%. - 83 -
- 50 13% 1000 4%. - 30 1000 13%. : 657. :, 2008 2012. < 3-23>. - 60% 70%. - 84 -
35 (efficient turnover). - < 3-24> 1%. - 85 -
: * 1%. :, 2008 2012. - 86 -
-. < 3-25>,,,,. - 10% 1%p. - 12%p. - - 7 10%p. - 1 3%p. - 2%p. -,,,,. - 87 -
- 88 -
- 89 -
:, *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1. :, 2008~2012. - 90 -
4 20%, 40%. -, -,. -.. -. 10%. -. - 91 -
- (, ) -. 10% 2. - -. - 60%. -.. 6:4. - 2/3. -,. - 92 -
100.. -,. -.,,. - ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,. -. - 93 -
-,.,,,,.,,...,,,,. -,,,,. -. - 94 -
( ). -. -. -. - 95 -
- 1,2 FGI(Focused Group Interview). - 1,2 ( 4 ) (), FGI. 1,. 2 -,. FGI. 1,2 (),,,. FGI,. - <4-1>,. - 96 -
- 97 -
280, 291., 160 (60), 4 (60), (40). 63 10 (16), 10~99 (27), 100 (20). 68. 160, (37.5%) 4 (37.5%), (25%). 80(50%). 23.1%, / 28.8%, 48.1%< 4-2>. 63 10 16(25.4%), 10~99 27(42.9%), 100~199 20(31.7%)., 30(47.6%), 33 (52.4%)< 4-3>. 68, 10 22 (32.4%), 10~99 26(38.2%), 100~299 20(29.4%). 50%. 35(51.5%), 33(48.5%) < 4-4>. - 98 -
- 99 -
- 100 -
- 101 -
(76.5%), (67.6%), (48.5%) < 4-5>. - 10 86.4%, 10~99 80.8%. 100~299 75.0%. 70.6%, 82.4%., 71.4%, 81.8%. - 102 -
1). 2) 68. (36.5%) (20.6%) (57.1%) < 4-6>. 14.3%. - < 4-6> (10 31.3%, 10~99 33.3%, 100~299 45.0%), (10 12.5%, 10~99 14.8%, 100~299 20.0%). - 103 -
100~299 65.0%( 45.0%, 20.0%). 10-99 (29.6%). -, ( 40.0%, 33.3%), (23.3%). - (28.1%), (25.0%) (45.2%). - (46.2%) (20.8%), 20(37.8%) 30(34.6%) (20 24.3%, 30 15.4%)< 4-7>. - 1 (30.8%) 2, 3 53.3%, 45.5%. 3. - 104 -
1) 68. - 105 -
1) 68. - 106 -
(35.8%), (30.8%) 3 2 < 4-8>. 17.5%. - 4 (42.5%) (38.8%). 4 (24.5%). - 4 82.5%, 63.3%.. - (45.2%) 6.5%. 41.9%.. -, 35%, 30%. 25 (51.6%). - 107 -
1) 120. - 2.5%. - 108 -
< 4-9> 91.2%, 79.4%, 72.1%. (52.9%) (54.4%), (23.5%). - 100-299 10-99 57.7% 45.0%. 30%.. 1). 2) 68. - 109 -
< 4-10> (27.1%), (20.3%). - (100-299 21.1% 10 46.2%),, 99 20%. 100-299 (26.3%) () (21.1%). - (33.3%) (20.7%). (34.5%) (20.0%). 1) 59. - 110 -
< 4-11> 27%. (27.3%) (27.3%), (24.3%). - 20(22.2%), 30(34.8%), 30 20. ( 1 33.3% 3 40.0%). 1) 59. - 111 -
< 4-12> (81.4%). 10 100-299. - (82.8%) (80.0%) (83.3%) (79.3%). 1) 59. (81.8%). 20(77.8%) 30(87.0%) 3 100% < 4-13>. - 112 -
1) 59. (30.0%). (17.5%),, (15.0%)< 4-14>. (3.3%) 10%. - (31.7%). - (41.9%), 4 35.0%, 18.4%. (26.5%). - 113 -
-, (/ 29.2%, 31.7%). 1) 120. // (39.0%) /(21.4%). 23, 40%, 23~24 25 34.0% 28.2% < 4-15>. - 114 -
1) 120. (74.2%), 83.9%. / 83.3%.< 4-16> 70% < 4-17>. 23 100%. - 115 -
1) 120. 1) 120. - 116 -
,. -,,. - 70%,.,,., < 4-18>.,, < 4-19>. - 117 -
- 80%.,, 50%. - 100~299 90.0%. (82.4%) (91.2%), (80.0%) (93.9%). žž 1) 5. 2) 68. - 118 -
žž - 119 -
( : 5.9%, 33.8%), ( : 45.6%, 33.8%)< 4-2 0>. ( 60.3%, 79.4%). 50%. 73,5%. 1). 2) 68. 50% < 4-21>. ( 79.4%, 75.6%). - 120 -
- ( 26.7%, 31.8%, 35.1%). ( 21.4%, 23.1%, 29.6%). 1). 2) (45), (63), (64). 5. 4.38, 4.31. / 4.19 < 4-22>. - 100~299 (4.50), (4.50), (4.50 ), / (4.50). 10-99 10 (4.43) / (4.60). - 121 -
- / (4.38) (4.50). - (4.56), (4.44), (4.44), / (4.44) (4.14), (4.14), (4.14). -. - 122 -
žžž. 1) 5. 2) 16. - 123 -
// (28.8%) / (10.6%), // / (8.1%), (7.5%). 10.0%< 4-23>. - // (31.7%) (8.3%), / ( 8.3%), 4 // (26.7%) / (13.3%), // / (13.3%). / / (27.5%), / (12.5%). 15.0%. - // ( 27.5%, 30.0%) / (13.8%), (10.0%), / (17.5%), /// (13.8%).,,,,, ////,. - // / ///, /,. - 124 -
- / // / / ( 43.6%, 15.6%)< 4-24>. 23 / (10.4%). 23~24 25 // ( 27.1%, 27.5%), 23~24 /// (11.4%), 25 / (15.7%). - 125 -
1) 160. - 126 -
1) 160. - 127 -
(4.29), / (4.26), (4.24) (4.24 ) < 4-25>. -, (3.27), (3.74). - / (4.27 ) 4 (4.35) (4.32). (4.45) (4.40). - / (4.34) (4.29). (4.34) (4.30), (4.30 ). - (4.41), / / (4.25)., (4.32). - / (4.31), // / (4.36) < 4-26>. 23 (4.80) (4.80), 23~24 (3.33), 25 (4.31). - 128 -
1) 5. 2) 160. - 129 -
1) 5. 2). - 130 -
88.1%, / 85.6% < 4-27>. - 4 (96.7%) (95.0%). - (88.8%) / (87.5%), (88.8%), ( 87.5%). - (95.5%), / / (90.9%) (89.5%). - / (92.3%) / / / (90.9%) < 4-28>. - 23~24 ( 91.4%), 25,, / 88.2%. - 131 -
1) 5. 2) 160. - 132 -
1) 5. 2). - 133 -
80%~90%,. -.. /,. // /. 10.0% 15.0% 4 / 20.0%., /,,. /,. ( 76.5%, 75.0%)< 4-29>. - 134 -
1). 2) 68. (100%), (73.3%), (66.7%),,, < 4-30>. - 1/3. 1). 2) 68. - 135 -
, 1/3. 159.95 10 161.67, 100~299 157.14 < 4-31>. - 10~99 6.30, 175.41. - (169.71) (151.93) 17.78. 3.72 27.69. - (166.19) (152.04) 17.15. 1.39 0.97. - 19.71, 9.71. - 136 -
žžž 1) 49. 2,356, 4 2,686, 2,382 4 < 4-32>. - 289. - /,.. - 137 -
1) 160. - // / 180, 25 2,572 < 4-33>. 1) 160. - 138 -
10~99,.. 4,,, //. 41.98, 2.00 43.98 < 4-34>. - 10 43.88 0.38 44.25. - 42.55, 41.37 1.18. 1.91. - 42.13, 41.84. - 139 -
-. ž 1) 63. 44.18< 4-35>. 45.38 4 42.70. -,,,. - 140 -
1). 2) 160. - / (49.81) 23 (50.60) < 4-36>. 1). 1) 160. - 141 -
10,,..,,, /, 23. - 4.,. 100~299 (3.55), 100 / (10 3.56, 10-99 3.52). - /,, /. /. - 142 -
-. ž 1) 5. 2) 63. - 143 -
70% 100~299 (30.0%) (25%). 10~99 (29.6%) 7.4% < 4-38>. - (30.0%) (20.0%), (22.6%) (15.6%). (20.5%) (16.7%). ž 1) 63. - 144 -
10 (31.3%)< 4-39>. -, 10 10. - (30.0%) (15.25). (29.0%) (15.6%) 13.4%p. (23.1%) (20.8%). ž 1) 63. - 145 -
10 90% < 4-40>.,,., (43.6%) (33.3%). ž 1) 63. < 4-41>. 10 37.5%. - 146 -
- (23.3%) (30.3%), (29.0%) (25.0%), (30.8%) (20.8%). - 20.5%, 16.7%. ž 1) 63. < 4-42>. - 10~99 40.7%, 39.4%., 35.5%, 34.4%, (38.5%) (29.2%). - 147 -
ž 1) 63. < 4-43>. - - 36.4% 37.5%. - (41.7%) (30.8%). - 148 -
ž 1) 63. < 4-44>. - 10~99 40.7%, 10 37.5%, 100~299 35.0%. 39.4%. - 40.6%, 37.5%, 38.5%. - 149 -
ž 1) 63. 10 31.3% < 4-45>. -. -,, (22.6%) (6.3%) (17.9%) (8.3%). - 150 -
ž 1) 63. 10 (25.0%)< 4-46>. -,,,. - 151 -
ž 1) 63. / 10% 40% < 4-47>. -,, 10%. - 48.5% 46.7%, 53.1% 41.9%. 0.0%. - 48.7% 45.8%. - 152 -
ž 1) 63. 25% < 4-48>. - 10~99 (33.3%). - (39.4%), (34.4%). (33.3%). - 153 -
ž 1) 63. 70%... -.,. - 90%.. - 154 -
-.,,,. -,,.. -,.,. - 10-99,,.. -,.. - 40%.,,,. - 10-99,,.. - 155 -
< 4-49>. - 100~299 80.0%. - 75.8%, 77.4%. - 14.1%p. žžž 1) 63. - 156 -
50% < 4-50>. 10 60.0%. - 75.0% 50%. - 71.4% 44.4% 33.3%.. žžž 1) 16. - 157 -
43.8% < 4-51>. - 100~299 50.0%, 25.0%. 10 40.0%. - 62.5% 37.5%. 100% 42.9%. - 33.3% 44.4%. - (50.0%) 50.0%. - 158 -
žžž 1). 2) 16. (4.38) (4.31) < 4-52>. - 10 / (4.60), 10~99 (4.43). - / (4.38), (4.50). (4.56). - 159 -
-, ( 4.50, 4.25), ( 4.50, 4.25). žžž 1) 5. 2) 16. - 160 -
,.,. -,.,. - 43.8%..,.. -,. 100~299 /, 10~99. /.. - 161 -
< 4-53>. - (76.5%), (67.6%). - (35.8%), (30.8%) 2.5%.. - (36.5%). (20.6%). - 162 -
1). - 163 -
/ < 4-54>. - (63.2%), (36.8%) 81.4%, 74.2% 70%. 1) 68. < 4-55> (91.2%), (79.4%), (72.1%). ( 27.1%, 30.0%), ( - 164 -
16.9%, 9.2%) ( 44.0%, 39.2%). -,.. 1). 2),. 3) 120. - 165 -
/. - < 4-56> (31.5%), (26.3%), (25.6%) (83.4%). - 22.05%, / 26.00%, 20.96%, // 30.99%< 4-57>. -, /. 1). 2) 160. : (2014), 2014. p. 2. - 166 -
21.6%(442.49).. -. 385 (17.1%), 421 (21.9%). 265 (11.8%) 587 (30.6%). -. - 167 -
.,,. - < 4-59> 44.18 43.98. 38.85. - 40 12.... - 168 -
/ 40%,. - / (3.52), (3.44), (3.38), (2.95), (3.08), (3.08). (,, ). - 169 -
-,.. - (2.63%) (2.69), (2.69).. 1) 5. - 170 -
. - (4.38), (4.31), (4.19) / (4.19). - (4.29), / (4.26). (3.62), (3.24).. -. - 171 -
2. :, 2014,,. - 172 -
, 23),,. -,,. (, 65 24) ) () () ( ) (, 6 ), 34, () (1 347, ) (, 2014-13 25) ) () () ( ) () (, ), ( 40,, ). 23). (On the Job Training, OJT).. ().. 24) 2014. 2. 4 25), 2014. 3. 3. - 173 -
.,. (, 65 26) ) (), () 34 (15~34) (, 6, 35~39 ) () 6, 20, 30, (, 27) ) (), () 15 34, 39 26) 2014. 2. 4. 27) 2014. 1. - 174 -
() 50%( 80 ), () 6 65*6(390), 20~30% 1 (, 14, 14 ) () ( ),, () () 21(), 2() 4( ) (), 1 7., 40% ()., () (Work-net),.. - 175 -
(, 28) ) (), ' ' () 18~64 (), ( 150%) ( I), (), ( ) 6, 2, ((NEET)), ( 8 15 ) ( II) () 4. 1 2 3 2~3, 2 3 6. (, 2014 ) () ( ) () 15 34 () () 28) 2014. - 176 -
30 420. - < 4-62> 4,, 1/3 -.. - 177 -
< 4-1> 4. - 4 66% 43%,,, 35%, 20%. - 50% 4 4. - 178 -
- 70%.,,. -,,. < 4-2>. - 12% 10%. - 179 -
-. -, 4. < 4-3> --. -,,. - 180 -
-. < 4-4> (, )- -(, ) 30% 40%. - 4.3%(23 1) 26%(23 6). - 181 -
140 < 4-63>. - 10, 10-99, 100-299,. - 75% 18 33. - 182 -
< 4-5> 40 50% 10%. -.. -. - 183 -
< 4-6> 1/5 5%. 26 2(8%), 12 (46%), (46%). - 184 -
50 2 < 4-64>. - 10 28%, 10-99 42%, 100-299 30%. -, 5:5 60% 20. - 185 -
,,,. < 4-7> 20 30%. -. - 186 -
< 4-8>. - 10(20%) 10%. 10. - 187 -
< 4-9> 1/5. - 10-99. 10 10 6 60%. - 188 -
. -, 40%, 60%. -. -.,.,.. - 189 -
- 1, 2 (Focus Group Interview, FGI). : 2014. 8. 8 11. 3. : 10 : 10 FGI, 29) 5, 30) 3, 31) 2 FGI, 20 4, 50 5, 51-299 1 < 4-65>. 29)..,, ㆍ (, 23) 30). (task) (,,, 2007). ( 21).. 31). (,, 2007),,, ( 8 2).. - 190 -
,,,, < 4-66>. - 191 -
.. < 4-5>. - 192 -
,..,. < 4-5>... -.. -. < 4-15>. - 193 -
-,,,.. -.,. -,,.. - 194 -
< 4-18>. -.,. - ( )..,.. ( : ). (identify). - 195 -
..... < 4-32> 2,486 ( 207 ). 170 < 4-31>.. - 196 -
...,,... - 50-60, 600-700. (labor mobility).. -... - 197 -
... -.. -.. -,.. - 198 -
... -,... -.,.... -.. - 199 -
-.. -... -.. - 200 -
2013. - 2013 6,311 6 41 56.9% 0.4%p. 2013 265 20 4. 2013 4.0% 0.3%p. - 201 -
: 總務省統計局, 勞働力調査.,,,,,. - 202 -
: 厚生労働省, 平成 26 年版労働経済の分析.. : - 203 -
() 2009 8 0.42 2013 11 6 1 1.0 2014 5 1.09. : 2010 60.8% 2012 63.9%, 2013 67.3%, 2014 69.8% 4. 2010 15.8% 4 2014 17.5%. - 204 -
: 總務省統計局, 勞働力調査 2013 5.8% 0.5%p. 15 24 6.9% 1.2%p 25 34 5.3% 0.2%p 15 24. :. - 205 -
: 厚生労働省, 平成 26 年版労働経済の分析. 2014 3 (2014 41 ) 94.4% 93.9% < 5-5>. : 文部科学省, 学校基本調査. - 206 -
32) 33) - 2009 2013 15 34 2 182. 15 24 25 34 < 5-6>. - 2013 3 2002 60. 30 34 18 25 29 17. : 厚生労働省, 平成 26 年版労働経済の分析 32) 3. 1. 2. 3 ( ). 33) 15 34. - 207 -
99.7%, 62.7%. : 2012. ( ). : 中小企業庁, 中小企業白書. 2002 2007 (33.6% 36.4%) (36.0% 37.1%) < 5-7>. 34) 35) - 208 -
: 中小企業庁. 2009 中小企業白書. - 2012 10 ~ 2013 9 1 300 80% < 5-5>. - 209 -
: 2012 10 2013 9. : 厚生労働省 (2014). 平成 25 年若年者雇用実態調査の概況. - 210 -
.. 36). : 中小企業庁. 2006 中小企業白書.. - 2012 10~ 2013 9 1 300 87%, 5-29 38.3%. 36) 中小企業庁. 2006 中小企業白書. - 211 -
: 2012 10 2013 9 :. - 4 1.. - 212 -
- 2014 3 (2014 4 1 ) 94.4%< 5-5 >. 1,000 0.73 300 4.52< 5-9> 37).. : 厚生労働省, 職業安定局. 30 22% 1. - 2013 10 1 80.7%. 30 9 5~29 77.6% 1 22.4% < 5-7>. 37) ( リクルートワークス ), ワークス (2015 ) - 213 -
:. : 厚生労働省 (2014), 平成 25 年若年者雇用実態調査の概況. 38). -. - ( ハローワーク ). 38) 7 (2010) 3. - 214 -
... (career center) (job consulting)... 39) (career advise).. (career consultant) (career consulting).. 39) ( 水路 ). - 215 -
( ハローワーク ). - ( 新卒応援ハローワーク ) (2014 4 1, 57). - ( ジョブサポーター ),,,,,. -,,. -,. 40) 3. - 216 -
, -, 160 ( 地域若者サポートステーション ). -,. ( ). -. - 1,000. -,.. -. - 217 -
-.. - 1957 1967,,, 5. - 43,000 ( 2%), 47. 30, 1,500. - 300, 3. -,. 41). 41),, ( ) - 218 -
. -.,.. -.... -,.,.,. -.. -. - 219 -
(Proposals for Industrial Relations at Small & Medium Size Enterprises). - 1975,.,,,.. -. 6,000. - 47 420 6,000. -. -.. - 220 -
-,.. - 1972.... -,. ) 市.. - 43,000 1,000, 20. - 221 -
- () booth. Needs,. - Booth,.. - 2002 (Jobway).. 1,000 5.. -.,. -. -,.. - 222 -
-. -. -,. -.. -,. -,.,,,. -.... - 223 -
- (),.. 1987 : 1 : 300 : -,, ( 65-70%),. (). 2. - (),. - 224 -
- 2009 2015 4 99 16( 16%). 2012, 2013, 2014 20%.. - 47. - ( ),. -,. -... - 225 -
,. -.. - ( ).,,.,,. - < 5-10> ( 會社デ - タ ),. - 226 -
- ( 採用デ-タ ),. ( 短期大学 ), ( 高等専門学校 ), ( 専修 各種学校 ). 2,, 1,. - (9:00 17:50), ( 2, ). -. - 227 -
- 228 -
-.. - (career center) (job consulting), 1,000. -. 2010. ()M < 5-10 >.. -. 30.0% <4-14 >. - 229 -
,,.. -. 60% 20-24 94% 92%, 94% 88%. -... -. - 230 -
- 3. -.. - 231 -
. : a- b-. : Singapore Yearbook of Manpower Statistics(2014). 2013 6 344, 214. - 20 29 17% 15% ( 58%) 20 29 ( 48.5%). - 232 -
- 2 1 25 34 4 3. -. 20 24 39% 59% 25 29 70% 77%. 20 24 49% 47% 25 29 69% 78% 10%p. 30. -. 20 29 9% 6%, 20 24 8% 13% 25 29. -. - (20 29).,.,. 2013. - 233 -
: MOM. - < 5-10> 2013 2009 2013 27, 25% 134 (2014 7), 40%. - 2013. - 2013 2015 10% 30%. - 234 -
( 1 200 ) 99% 70%. : / 100. / 100. 100 ( ). : MOM (Labour Market Survey). - 235 -
< 5-10>,, 42). - 4.5% ( ). :. : MOM (Labour Market Survey). 42) 200, 200. MOM 25 25 199. - 236 -
- < 5-11>. -. ( /+ ). - 2013 1.2% 2.6%.. - < 5-12>,,. : MOM (Job Vacancy Survey). - 237 -
. : MOM (Job Vacancy Survey). - < 5-13> 6 200 40% 25 199 50%. - 200 72% 25 199 78%. - 238 -
:. : MOM (Job Vacancy Survey). - < 5-14>,,,, ( ),. -,,. - 239 -
. - 5 200 45%, 34% 43). 23% 9%. : MOM (Conditions of Employment Survey). - 15 1/2 1/4. 43) 44 72( 18).. - 240 -
-,.. -. - STP (Institute of technical education), (Polytechnic), (university),, 44). 44) 6 ( Primary School Leaving Exam ) (,, ) ( ). (Normal Technical) 4 1 2 (Institute of technical education). (Normal Academic) 4 1 3 (Polytechnic). (Express) 4 1 2 3 (junior college) 3( 4) (university).. (: http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/2014 9 10 ) - 241 -
- STP (Minstry of Trade and Industry),, SPRING SPRING. - STP < 5-10>. Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ - 242 -
: SPRING. < 5-10> STP. - STP. -. (Associai on of Small and Medium Enterprises), (Print a nd Media Association, Singapore), (Restaurant Association of Singapore), (Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce - 243 -
& Industry), (Singapore Food Manufacturers Asso ciation), (Singapore Manufacturing Federation), (Singapore Retailers Association), (Textile & Fashion Federation). 100. - SPRING STP STP. - 100 ( 30 40%). (human resource management). (HR Capability Toolkit). (manpower planning), (recruitment & selection), (compensation & benefits), (performance management), (learning & developmen t), (career management), (talent management & succession planning), (employee relations). S$200( S$560, S$360). - 244 -
,, S$5,000 (Innovation & Capability Voucher). ICV. - 30. - 1) 2) 3) 4) 5), 6). - 245 -
45). -,,. Career Service. -.. - 2006 (career start week) 1. -. 45) ㆍ ㆍ (2012). - 246 -
90% 5. 46) - (Work Work Week Tokyo),,,. Practical Professional Orientation(PPO) TET-tori. 47) - 13 16 1 2 Practical Professional Orientation(PPO) 6 5,. - TET-tori(http://www.peda.net/veraja/tori/) Jyväskylä (Finnish Institute for Educational Research) PPO,,,. -. 46) (2012). 47) (2012). - 247 -
1 2. - 8 9( 2 3) 1 2. - 7 9 1 2,, 1. Job Shadow. 48) - Job Shadow 8 18 1,. - 1998 National Job Shadow Coalition(NJSC) America's Promise, Junior Achievement,,, AT&T, Cisco,,, Society for Human Resource Management(SHRM) 48) (2012). - 248 -
2004 9 14 16 work-related learning 49). - Work-related learning, (working practices),,,., /. () : 1 () 13 4 1. :, 2007 1 (). - 'Gateway to College' 'Yonsei RC 101', 'Yonsei RC 102'. 49) (2008). - 249 -
- 'Yonsei RC 101', 'Yonsei RC 102',,,,, lab (< 5-12> ). - 250 -
RC : 2013 Residential College, RC (:,, ). : 1 2010 ',, /. (3 ), 1 2,, 1. 2 4 Junior Seminar - () Creative Leadership(CL) :,... - 251 -
- :. 3 13 2008 :, < 5-12>. - 252 -
- 253 -
: CEO. - () CEO :,. :, - (),,,,, 6 FnC,,.. (MBTI), (MMPI),,,. - 1,500. - 254 -
. - PISA 2006 OECD 27, OECD 27 26. 97.8%, 94.6%, 92.0% 38.4%, 89.2%, 87.4%, 86.8% 51.8%, 94.5%, 94.0%, 93.1% 44.1%. 50) - PISA 2006 "?" 20% (79%), (61%), (59%), (56%). 71% OECD. 51). -. 50), 2009, OECD, p.9. 51), 2009, OECD, p.8. - 255 -
. -. -.. - 256 -
(quality),. -, žž()..... - turnover, turnover. (, 2, 4 ). 4,., 2.. - 257 -
-,,,.,,,,,,... - 3 34.4%, 22.2%. ( 15.5%, 17.3%),, ( 14.8%, 15.4%), (12.1%, 9.7%) < 3-6 >. - 258 -
< 3-9 >. 10%, 6% 8%. 2. - 65-75% (60%) 30%.,,.. 52) -. 52). - 259 -
. -... -... -. - 260 -
. -,, /. -,. -, 2013 Residential College RC 1, /,. - 1 () (). 'Yonsei RC 101', 'Yonsei RC 102'. -, 2 4 Junior Seminar. - 261 -
-,,,. CEO. -. (). - < 4-58> 2,486, 2,044 442 (21.6%). - 1 2013 62% < 6-1>. 100-299 76.0% 30-99 67.6%, 10-29 59.0%, 5~9 49.9% 53). 53). 2013. - 262 -
:. 2013.. - 20-24 94% 92%, 94% 88%. 82% 72%, 89% 82%< 6-2>. - 263 -
:, 平成 25 年賃金構造基本統計調査 ( 全国 ) 結果の概況. - 264 -
,,, 4 2.995%, 4.5%, 0.90%, 0.196% 2.995%, 4.50%, 0.65%, 0.196%< 6-3>. 54) : 1) = (6.55%), 50%. 2) (2013.7.1. ) 0.65%, 0.65%, 150 0.25%. 2012 7 10 135 50% < 6-4>. 54),,,. - 265 -
:. 2013 1.1 1.5%p. 5 3.9%p, 2.5%p 3.9%p < 6-5>. 5 66.5%, 66.4%, 67.8% 60% 5 90%. -. - 266 -
:, 2013... () (,,, ) < 6-6>. 55). 55),,, - 267 -
:,. - (2004) 8. 56). 57) 2013 152.6 286.7 53.2%. 85 55.7%. 10-29 60.1%. - 67.2%.. (, 1996: p.8 9). 56) 1, 2 +, 3 +, 4 ++, 5 +++, 6 ++++, 7 +++++, 8 + +++ 57). - 268 -
(24.9%) (9.0%) 33.9%,,,,,, 23.9%, 15.7%.. -,, 18.7%, 19.5%, 47.9%. - 269 -
: ( ). :.. (Economic Rent). - 270 -
- R&D (Skilled Labor), Economic Rent ž.,. Economics Rent..,,, ž.,.. - (76.5%), (67.6%) (35.8%) (30.8%) 2.5%< 4-53 >. - 271 -
,, (FGI ). 63.2% 36.8% 81.4%, 74.2% < 4-54 >. (30.0%) < 4-55 >., (FGI ). -.. - 272 -
-... - 48.5% (76.5%), (67.6%), (100-299 55.0% 10 36.4%)< 4-5 > - (FGI ).. -. - 273 -
< 4-8> 17.5%. (30.8%) (35.8%)... -,,,, (, ).. -.. -,. -.. - 274 -
- < 4-8>. 4, 41.9%.,. -.... - ( 3). - 275 -
[] ( ) -. -,,,,,,,,.,, 800, 4.0, //ROTC,., (, ). ( ) -, 3,,. ( ) -,,,,,,. -.. - 276 -
-. -,,,.. ( ) -,. -,,, ( ).. ( ) - ( ).. - 277 -
- ( ) ( 30 ). -,. ( ) -, ž. ( ) -,,, /,. ( ) -, (JAT).,, 6 6,600~22,000., PT,. ( ) -. - 278 -
-.,.. ( ),,. -.. - SNS. 150. SNS. - 279 -
-,,,,,, < 5-10 >.. -. -. -.. < 4-27> 84.4%. - 280 -
- (2012) (33.3%) (39.0%) < 2-9 >. 70.8%< 2-11 >.,. -. - (rent-seeking). -,.,. -, (entry barrier). - 281 -
. - (job creation rate) (job destruction rate)...,. - 40.0%< 2-8 > - 282 -
58). -,,. 59) (18%) 60) (43.0%), (26.1%) < 2-2 >.,,. 58) // (35.7%), (32.7%).( (2012),., P.73). 59) 2014.7.1.. 60) (2014),,, 139 (2014.4.49),. - 283 -
- 5 1, 27.6% 61).,. -. 100-299 10.0% 10 31.3% < 4-45 >. (2012) 16.1% 86.4%. 62) - 27.6% < 2-11 >. -.. 61) (2012). P.81. 62). - 284 -
. -,,,. -,. 63) -....,.. 63),,. - 285 -
,.... -. /. - (31.5%), (26.3%), (25.6%) (83.4%) < 4-56 >. < 4-57> 22.1%, / 26.0%, 21.0%, / / 31.0%. - (43.8%). /. < 4-51 >. - 286 -
-.,.. - 170 169 1 < 4-31 >. -,,, /, < 4-38 >.. - FGI 50-60, 600-700.. - 287 -
- < 4-51> (labor mobility)..... -. -,. - 288 -
-. 2010 179, 89,028, 43...,.,..,.. - 289 -
(,, ),. 64). -.,.,,,,.,,,. -.. -. 64) (2010). - -.. pp.1~248. - 290 -
- 65).. 65) (2014).. The HRD review., pp. 20~22. - 291 -
ž ž : (2014). - 292 -
.. - : (2014 4 25) ` 66). -,, ž. TF,,. - 2014 (2014. 5. 1). 185,,,. - 67). 66) (2014.4). :. 67) (2014.5).. 2014. - 293 -
,. (governance) 68)..,. -.. :. 68) (2013) -,, -.,. - 294 -
2009 (horizontal policy-making) (stronger policy coordination)... -,. 69).,,.,.,. - (Cost center),,,.. 69), (2009)... 2009 9.. pp.54~68. - 295 -
( )... -... - (governance),. 4.15 2014 (governance). -,.,.. - 296 -
(2014).,. 139.. (2013)... pp.1~140. (2013). 2013 (2013). 2013. (2014.8.28.). (2014). 2014,,. (2014). 14 (2014).. (2014).. (2014).. 121. (2014).. 2014-6. (2014).. 2014-10. (2014).. 2014-19. (2014).. 31. (2014), 72. (2014).. (2014)., 2014-13. (2012)., 2012-112. (2014).. 2014-17. (2014).. 2014-18. - 297 -
(2014).. 2014-6. (2014).. 4. pp.1~25. (2014).. (2014)., 65. (2014).. (2013.10).. (2014). :., (2009).., 2009 9.. pp.54~68. (2010).. (2014). 2014. p.2 (2014). :. (2014.5).. 2014. (2013)... 2013 5.. pp.19~30. (2011).. 2011.. pp.27~54. (2004). -,, -. The Journal of Vocational Education Research. Vol 23, No.3.. pp.207-238. (2010).. 2011-04.. pp.1~192. (2014)..,.. pp.96~111., (2010)... (2005),, 2005 1. 2005 pp.35-44,. - 298 -
(2012).. &. 49.. pp.1~25. (2013)... pp.1~169. (2014).. The HRD review., pp. 20~22. (2012).. 2012 6. (2009).. 2009 3. (2012)., 2012 4... (2013.5.28.). -. http://m.imaeil.com/view/m/?news_id=26564&yy=2013. (2010).. 10-13.. pp.1~253. (2014). (2007),. (2012). :.. ž(2013).,,.. pp. 5~26 MOM. (Job Vacancy Survey)... (Labour Market Survey)... (Conditions of Employment Survey).., (2013).. The HRD Review. 2013 11.. pp.88~99 (2012).. The HRD Review. 2012 3. pp.6~35. (2010). - -.. pp.1~248. - 299 -
(2008),,, (KEIS2),. (2009). 日本, 2008-14.. pp.1~172. (2013)... pp.1~20. (2012).,. pp.1~626. (2009). OECD : 2006 PISA. working paper 2009-2.. (2008)... (2012). : 2011~2020.. pp.1~203. (2012)... pp.1~149. (2013). :.. pp.1~170. (2010).. 2010 4. pp.1~39. (2010). (1929). 2012 6. pp.1~53. (2013).,. 13. 2013 2. pp.1~87. (2014). 2014 (2014). 2014. 2014-283. (2014)., 2014-46. (2013). 2013. (2013).. (2013)., 2013-49. - 300 -
(2013).. 2013-37. (2013).. 2013-25. (2012)....,, (2012). :. 2012-23.. pp.1~413., (2013).. pp.1~30... (2012).,. 2012-56.. pp.1~75. (2009), Mismatch, 2009. pp.176~192. (2012).. 2012-38.. pp.1~227. (2014)... (2013). 2013. (2014). 4, 2014. 4. 25. p. 1. (2013)... pp.1~201. (2007),,. (2014), 平成 25 年若年者雇用実態調査の概況 Emer Smyth, Delma Byrne, Carmel Hannan (2003). The transition year programme: innovation within upper secondary education in the republic of Ireland. International Labour Organization(2013), Global Employment Trends For Youth 2013 : A generation at risk, International Labour Office(ILO). Singapore Yearbook of Manpower Statistics, 2014-301 -
Yuichi Ito et al(2009), Labour Mismatch in Japan: An Empirical Analysis, Research in Applied Economics. 厚生労働省. 平成 26 年版労働経済の分析. 内閣府 (2006). 企業の採用のあり方に関する調査. 株式会社マイナビ. 大学生就職意識調査. 経済同友会 (2012). 教育委員会 企業の採用と教育に関するアンケート調査. 経済同友会教育委員会. 企業の採用と教育に関するアンケート調査. の結果. - 302 -
: 2008 2012 25 54. * 300-999 5%. - 303 -
- 304 -
: 2008 2012 25 54. * 300-999 5%. - 305 -
- 306 -
: 2008 2012 25 54. * 300-999 5%. - 307 -
- 308 -
- 309 -
: 2008 2012 25 54. * 300-999 5%, - 310 -
- 311 -
: 2008 2012 25 54. * 300-999 5%. - 312 -
- 313 -
: 2008 2012 25 54. * 300-999 5%. - 314 -
(, 65 70) ) () () ( ) (, 6 ), 34, () 1 347( 20%, 278), 70%, ( 30%) (, 2014-13 71) ) () () ( ) () (, ), ( 40,, ) 70) 2014. 2. 4 71), 2014. 3. 3. - 315 -
(, 2013-8 72) ) () () 73) () Module,, CEO,, (, 74) ) (), ㆍ () (, ) () 3 3(,, ()) 1-1, 2, 72), 2013. 4. 18. 73) 762 3. 74) 2013. 2.22, 2014. 4. 23. - 316 -
(, 75) ) () () (,, ), - () (+),, (, 72 76) ) () ㆍㆍ () 15 24,, () 6 700, (, 1 300 ), (, ) () (),, 77) () 15 ( ), (, ) 75) 2013. 2.22, 2014. 4. 23. 76), 2014. 3. 27. 77) (http://upgrade-u.tistory.com/2597) - 317 -
(),, (, 2014-6 78) ) () () 15, 3, () ( 2 ) () (, 316,000), (, (, 2013-41 79) ) () (), ㆍ () 20 (ㆍ ), (. : 3,000, : 212,500 ) 78), 2014. 3. 17. 79), 2013. 9. 9. - 318 -
(, 2013-41 80) ) () () () 80~100%, 1 1 ( 150%) (, 2014-10 81) ) (),, (), () () () : ( 15, 80%), ( 4, 100%., 80%), ( 1, 100%) 80), 2013. 9. 9.. 81), 2014. 2. 26. 52 1 6. - 319 -
ㆍ (, 2014-10 82) 27, 252 257) (), 83). () (),, () () () () ( ) (, 2014-18 84) (),. (),,,, 82), 2014. 2. 26. 52 1 6. 83), 4, 2014. 4. 25., p. 1. 84), 2014. 3. 28. - 320 -
() 10(5, 5) 1% ( ), 2.5% (), 4%(,, ). (, 2012-112 85) ) () () () () () () : ( ) 15,000, 20,000, 30,000 (, 2012-112 86) ) (),, () ( ) () (, 2,000 ), (, 800 ) (, 100 ), (, 600, 70% ) 85), 2012. 10. 25. 23, 2. 86), 2012. 10. 25. 24, 3. - 321 -
(, 2012-112 87) ) () HRD (, ) () (),,, 700 (, 2014-19 88) ) () (),, () 100, 1 5 300 ( 200 ) (, 2014-17 89) ) () (),, () 200, 200, 5 300 87), 2012. 10. 25. 25, 4. 88), 2014. 4. 9. 4. 89), 2014. 3. 28. 33, 42. - 322 -
(, 2014-17 90) ) (),, (), 8,000 ( 4,800 ) () ( 200 ) (, 31 91) ) () () (. ) () (,, ) ( 1%, 1.5%) (, 2013-49 92) ) (), 90), 2014. 3. 28. 32, 41. 91), 2012. 3. 20. 92), 2013. 2. 25. - 323 -
() 1 ( ) ( ), 2,, (,, )() () (, ),,, (, 93) ) (), () 15 34, 39 () 50%( 80 ), () 6 65*6(390), 20~30% 1 (, 65 94) ) (), 93) 2014. 1. 94) 2014. 2. 4. - 324 -
() 34 (15~34) (, 6, 35 ~39 ) () 6, 20, 30, (, 2014-46 95) ) () () 21 * 3 ( ) : 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. () (, 96) ) (),, () ( ) 95), 2014. 7. 22. 18 2, 172. 96) 2014., 20, 17.. - 325 -
() (, ( -) 1, ), ( ), ( ), ( ) () () () ( 1/2(10 2/3) 5,000 ), ( 2/3 2 5,000 ), ( 30 1 120 1 ) () (),, () 1 1 ( ) () 3 () () - 326 -
() 1 1 1,080 () () R&D () () ( ) 3 ( ) () 1, 3 (1 3 ),,, 50% 40%, 3 30%. (), () 7, 3, 55-327 -
(), () () () () 1, 3(1 ), 50%( 5,000/) () () 3 ( ), 1 (, )( ), () () () 50%, 2 3( 1 ) R&D () R&D (, ), R&D (), 6 (), () () () 1 5( 3, 2 ) - 328 -
() () () () (),, () : 10 ( ), 50, 3(1 8 ) () ( ) () () () 1, 2 10 180 (, 121 97) ) (),,, () () ( ) 97), 2014. 5. 20. - 329 -
(, ) (),, (),, () ( ) HRD-Net (, ) () () () () ( ) (, 2013 98) ) (), () 2, (),, ( 25 ), 98) 2013. 4.. 18 2( ) 18 3( ) 17 2( ) 17 3( ). - 330 -
(, ) () () (),, (, 99) ) () '' () () ( ), (,, ), (,, ) (, 2015. 7. 1. 100) ) () 99) 2014. 100), :, 2014. 4. 15..,, 2014. 5. 30. - 331 -
() :,, 2014 7 1 1, 2 101), 3 () 2 200 ( 400) (, 102) ) () () CCC : ( 3 ), (, 1, ) () 5 100%, 5 (1 4 ) (, 2013-37 103) ) () 104) () 31,, (20 ) 101),, 2014. 5. 30. 102) 2011. 08. 26.. 103), 2013. 8. 14. 104) http://www.bizinfo.go.kr/usersupportworkinfolist.do?policyinfoserchto.insttse=1&policyin foserchto.insttid=smbaa0000&policyinfoserchto.lclasid=&policyinfoserchto.supportworksn =14-332 -
() 30 (, 2014-283 105) ) () () 3( 10~ 13) 20%, 15%, (2010) 10, 2014 ( 29 ) () 0.4%p ( 70, 10) (, 2014-6 106) ) () () ( 2,400 ), (, [ ] 4, ) () 1 300(), 600() 100. 105) 2014, 2014. 8. 17. 106), 2014. 2. 5. - 333 -
(, 107) ) (), '' () 18~64 (), ( 150%) ( I), (), ( ) 6, 2, ((NEET)), ( 8 15 ) ( II) () 4. 1 2 3 2~3, 2 3 6. 2 (200 30~50% ) I (, I 10~20%) (, 108) ) () () ( 109) 110) ) 24 () ( 3) ( 100, 300) 107) 2014. 108) 2014. 5. 30. 109) 2014. 2.,. 110). - 334 -
(, ) (), () 18~24 () ( ),, 3-1 40,. (, 1181 111) ) () () () (, 2013-25 112) ) () () 5 113) 111), 2014. 3. 26. 2014. 15. 112), 2013. 6. 113) 85 m2, - 335 -
85m2 : 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. () (, 14 114) ) (),, () () 1 80 ( 60 ) 50% 1. 1 1 ( 1). 30%( 60%). 114) 2014. 4. 17. - 336 -
(, 115) ) (), () 5000 (15~29) () 7 3. () (, 116) 25, 52) () () (), () : 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6. () (5, (, )) (, ) () () 4 3,4 2,3 (5 5 115), :, 2014. 4. 15. 2015. 116) 2013. 9. 23, - 337 -
), 100 70, : 4 : () ( ) 200 ( 40 )* - 338 -
3. 1, 2차 설문조사지 가. 제 1차 설문조사(설문지) 1) 청년-중소기업간 미스매치 설문조사(구직자용) QN - 통계법 (제 33조 비밀의 보 호)에 의거 본 조사에서 개인 ID 의 비밀에 속하는 사항은 엄격 히 보호됩니다. (실사관리번호) LISTID 201406 037_01 NO(입력아이디) 청년-중소기업간 미스매치 설문조사(구직자용) 안녕하십니까 이번에 연세대학교 경제연구소에서는 고용노동부의 의뢰를 받아 지속적으로 하락하고 있는 청년 고용률을 높이기 위해 청년-중소기업 간 인력미스매치 완화를 위한 정책과제를 발굴하여 정책대안을 마련하고자 청년-중소기업 미스매치 실태조사 를 실시하고 있습니다. 본 조사를 통해 얻어진 자료는 청년-중소기업 미스매치 완화를 위한 정부 정책수립과 관련 한 연구의 기초자료로 사용될 것입니다. 아울러 여러 분께서 이번에 응답해 주신 내용은 연구를 위한 통계적 분석 이외에는 다른 용도로는 절대 전용하지 않을 것임을 약속드립니다. 여러 가지로 바쁘시더라도 잠시만 시간을 내어주시어 설문에 진솔한 의견을 말씀해 주신다면 정말로 감사하겠습니다. 2014년 7월 연세대학교 경제연구소 최강식교수 문의사항이 있으시면 아래의 전화번호로 연락 부탁드립니다. 조 사 대 행: (주)아이알씨 (150-871 서울시 영등포구 여의도동 14-8 극동VIP빌딩 4층) 문의 및 회신: 나하나 팀장 ( )02-6279-1905 (Fax) 0505-909-8171 (email) hana@irc.ne.kr 면접원이름 면접원ID 검토자1 검토자2 표시 항목은 (주)아이알씨에서 기입하는 란입니다. 응답자 성명 SQ1. 성별 ( 1) 남성 조사일시 월일 전화번호 ) SQ2. 교육정도 SQ2-1. 학력 ( 2) 여성 ) 1) 무학 ( SQ2-3번으로 이동) 3) 중학교 ( SQ2-3번으로 이동) 5) 전문대(초급대) 7) 대학원 2) 초등학교 ( SQ2-3번으로 이동) 4) 고등학교 ( SQ2-3번으로 이동) 6) 대학 - 339 -
- 340 -
<A. 구직자 / 취업자공통설문 - 경제활동상태 > - 341 -
<A-1. 구직자설문설문 > <B. 구직자에대한설문 > <B-1. 중소기업취업의사 > <B-2. 정보의미스매치 > <B-3. 기타미스매치 > - 342 -
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5-343 -
<B-5. 직장경험 > 36. (: ). <C. 개인및가정배경 > - 344 -
201406 QN - 037_02 ID( 실사관리번호 ) LISTID NO( 입력아이디 ) 청년 - 중소기업간미스매치설문조사 ( 취업자용 ) 조사대행 : ( 주 ) 아이알씨 문의및회신 : 나하나팀장 ( )02-6279-1905 (Fax) 0505-909-8171 (email) hana@irc.ne.kr 면접원이름 면접원ID 검토자1 검토자2 조사일시 (). 응답자성명 회사명 전화번호 - 345 -
<A. 구직자 / 취업자공통설문 - 경제활동상태 > <A-1. 취업자설문 > - 346 -
<B. 취업자에대한설문 > <B-1. 정보의미스매치 > - 347 -
<B. 취업자에대한설문 > <B-2. 기타미스매치 > 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5-348 -
QN - 201406 037_03 ID( 실사관리번호 ) LISTID NO( 입력아이디 ) 청년 - 중소기업간미스매치설문조사 ( 인사담당자용 ) 조사대행 : ( 주 ) 아이알씨 문의및회신 : 나하나팀장 ( )02-6279-1905 (Fax) 0505-909-8171 (email) hana@irc.ne.kr 면접원이름 면접원ID 검토자1 검토자2 조사일시 (). 응답자성명회사 ( 기관 ) 명 E-mail 주소 전화번호 부서 / 직위 - 349 -
I. 설문대상판정 II. 정보의미스매치 - 350 -
III. 스킬미스매치 - 351 -
IV. 기타미스매치 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5-352 -
V. 기업의특성 - 353 -
<B-4. 이직관련사항 > 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5-354 -
<C. 개인및가정배경 > - 355 -
나. 제 2차 설문조사(설문지) 1) 청년-중소기업간 미스매치 설문조사(구직자용), QN - 통계법 (제의거33조본 비밀 의 보호)에 조사 에서 개인의 비밀에 속하 는 사항은 엄격히 보호 됩 니다. ID(실사관리번호) LISTID 201410 080_03 NO(입력아이디) 2014년 청년-중소기업간 미스매치 실태조사(구직자용) 안녕하십니까 이번에 연세대학교 경제연구소에서는 고용노동부의 의뢰를 받아 지속적으로 하락 하고 있는 청년 고용률을 높이기 위해 청년-중소기업 간 인력미스매치 완화를 위한 정책과제를 발굴하여 정책대안을 마련하고자 청년-중소기업 미스매치 실태조사 를 실시하고 있습니다. 본 조사를 통해 얻어진 자료는 청년-중소기업 미스매치 완화를 위한 정부 정책수 립과 관련한 연구의 기초자료로 사용될 것입니다. 아울러 여러 분께서 이번에 응답해 주신 내용은 연구를 위한 통계적 분석 이외에는 다른 용도로는 절대 전용하지 않을 것 임을 약속드립니다. 여러 가지로 바쁘시더라도 잠시만 시간을 내어주시어 설문에 진솔한 의견을 말씀 해 주신다면 정말로 감사하겠습니다. 2014년 10월 연세대학교 경제연구소 최강식교수 문의사항이 있으시면 아래의 전화번호로 연락 부탁드립니다. 조 사 대 행: (주)아이알씨 (150-871 서울시 영등포구 여의도동 14-8 극동VIP빌딩 4층) 문의 및 회신: 나하나 팀장 ( )02-6279-1905 (Fax) 0505-909-8171 (email) hana@irc.ne.kr 면접원이름 면접원ID 검토자1 검토자2 표시 항목은 (주)아이알씨에서 기입하는 란입니다. 응답자 성명 SQ1. 성별 ( 1) 남성 조사일시 월일 전화번호 ) SQ2. 교육정도 SQ2-1. 학력 ( 2) 여성 ) 1) 무학 ( SQ2-3번으로 이동) 3) 중학교 ( SQ2-3번으로 이동) 5) 전문대(초급대) 7) 대학원 2) 초등학교 ( SQ2-3번으로 이동) 4) 고등학교 ( SQ2-3번으로 이동) 6) 대학 - 356 -
- 357 -
<A. 구직자 / 취업자공통설문 - 경제활동상태 > <A-1. 구직자설문설문 > - 358 -
<B. 정책 > 7. 다음정책에대해다음사항을각각표시해주십시오. 일 학습병행제 ( 취업을원하는청년근로자가일과학습을병행하는제도 ) 취업성공패키지 (1:1 개인별맞춤취업지원프로그램 ) 스펙초월멘토스쿨 (34세미만청년들에게멘토들이현장맞춤으로멘토링을제공하여취업으로연계 ) 청년강소기업체험프로그램 ( 구 직장체험프로그램 으로 3개월이내직장체험지원 ) 중소기업청년인턴제 ( 중소기업인턴고용및정규직전환시임금의일부지원 ) 청년취업아카데미 ( 대학졸업예정자, 졸업생, 일반고출신학생들에게산업연관교육제공 ) 청년취업진로지원 ( 대학청년고용센터 ) 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 참여하였다 1) 안다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 2) 참여하지않았다 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다응답향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답 인지여부 응답 참여여부 응답 참여시만족도 1) 참여하였다 1) 안다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답 인지여부 응답 참여여부 응답 참여시만족도 1) 참여하였다 1) 안다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 참여하였다 1) 안다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 2) 참여하지않았다 4) 만족5) 매우만족 2) 모른다응답향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 참여하였다 1) 안다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 참여하지않았다 2) 모른다응답향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 2) 참여하지않았다 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다응답향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답 인지여부 응답 참여여부 응답 참여시만족도 1) 안 1) 참여하였다 다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 - 359 -
QN - ID( 실사관리번호 ) LISTID NO( 입력아이디 ) 201410 080_02 2014 년청년 - 중소기업간미스매치실태조사 ( 취업자용 ) 조사대행 : ( 주 ) 아이알씨 문의및회신 : 나하나팀장 ( )02-6279-1905 (Fax) 0505-909-8171 (email) hana@irc.ne.kr 면접원이름 면접원ID 검토자1 검토자2 조사일시 (). 응답자성명 회사명 전화번호 - 360 -
<A. 구직자 / 취업자공통설문 - 경제활동상태 > - 361 -
<A. 취업자설문 > - 362 -
<B. 정책 > 11. 다음정책에대해다음사항을각각표시해주십시오. 일 학습병행제 ( 취업을원하는청년근로자가 일과학습을병행하는제도 ) 취업성공패키지 (1:1 개인별맞춤 취업지원프로그램 ) 스펙초월멘토스쿨 (34세미만청년들에게멘토들이현장 맞춤으로멘토링을제공하여취업으로연계 ) 청년강소기업체험프로그램 ( 구 직장체험 프로그램 으로 3개월이내직장체험지원 ) 중소기업청년인턴제 ( 중소기업인턴고용및 정규직전환시임금의일부지원 ) 청년취업아카데미 ( 대학졸업예정자, 졸업생, 일반고출신 학생들에게산업연관교육제공 ) 청년취업진로지원 ( 대학청년고 용센터 ) 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다응답향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 2) 참여하지않았다 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 1) 참여향후참여희망여부희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다 응답 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 - 363 -
<C. 개인및가정배경 > - 364 -
QN - ID( 실사관리번호 ) LISTID NO( 입력아이디 ) 2014060 37_03 2014 년청년 - 중소기업간미스매치실태조사 ( 인사담당자용 ) 조사대행 : ( 주 ) 아이알씨 문의및회신 : 나하나팀장 ( )02-6279-1905 (Fax) 0505-909-8171 (email) hana@irc.ne.kr 면접원이름 면접원ID 검토자1 검토자2 조사일시 (). 응답자성명 회사 ( 기관 ) 명 전화번호 부서 / 직위 E-mail 주소 - 365 -
I. 설문대상판정 Ⅱ. 정책 2. 다음정책에대해다음사항을각각표시해주십시오 일 학습병행제 ( 취업을원하는 청년근로자가일과학습을병행하는제도 ) 청년강소기업체험프로그램 ( 구 직장체험 프로그램 으로 3개월이내직장체험지원 ) 중소기업청년인턴제 ( 중소기업 인턴고용및 정규직전환시임금의일부지원 ) 청년취업아카데미 ( 대학졸업예정자, 졸업생, 일반고출신학생들에게산업연관교육제공 ) 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다응답향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 2) 모른다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 응답 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다응답향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 응답인지여부응답참여여부응답참여시만족도 1) 안다 1) 참여하였다 2) 참여하지않았다 1) 매우불만족 2) 불만족 3) 보통 4) 만족 5) 매우만족 2) 모른다응답향후참여희망여부 1) 참여희망 2) 참여의사없다 - 366 -
Ⅲ. 기업의특성 - 367 -
[].,.. ( A, B, C, F, F, I). []... ( )... ( B, D, E, F, J) [] ( ).. ( A, B, C, D, F, F, H, I) [].( H). - 368 -
[],... ( I) []. ( B, H) []...( C) []. ( B)., ( D). [] (MBTI, )..... ( J) - 369 -
[]....( A, B, D, E, H, G, I, J) []... ( A, D, E, I, J) []..,.. ( A, D, E, I) [] (, ).,.. ( A, D, E, F, G, I, J) - 370 -
[].... ( F, G) []..,... -. ( B) []...,.. ( A) []..,. (D) []...,. ( A, H) - 371 -
[]........ ( D) []..( C) []... ( A, B, D, E, F, G, I, H, J) [],... ( A, B, D, I, J) [] 10-11. 50.. ( H) - 372 -
[] ( C, H) []...,. ( F, G) [].( C) [ ]., ( 50-60, 600-700 ).,.( A, B, F, G) - 373 -
[]... ( I) [].... ( C, F, G) []....,. ( A, B, D, E, F, G, I, J) [].... ( A, B, D, E, I, J) - 374 -
[].,... ( F, G) []. ( A) [].. (D) [ ]..,. ( A, C) - 375 -