Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The obje

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

부산교육 311호

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * The Meaning of Pl

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: Exploring Education

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

서론 34 2

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

12이문규

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

04-다시_고속철도61~80p

02양은용

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

Output file

12¾ÈÇö°æ 1-155T304®¶ó

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

4ÃÖÁØ¿µ

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA



Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

γ

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

¿ï¸²58È£

<B3EDB9AEC1FD5F3235C1FD2E687770>

09김정식.PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception


untitled

2015 경제ㆍ재정수첩

<3136C1FD31C8A35FC3D6BCBAC8A3BFDC5F706466BAAFC8AFBFE4C3BB2E687770>

歯1.PDF

<31362DB1E8C7FDBFF82DC0FABFB9BBEA20B5B6B8B3BFB5C8ADC0C720B1B8C0FC20B8B6C4C9C6C32E687770>

,......

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

삼교-1-4.hwp


30이지은.hwp

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;


<332EC0E5B3B2B0E62E687770>

KD hwp

<31342DC0CCBFEBBDC42E687770>

Lumbar spine

대한한의학원전학회지26권4호-교정본(1125).hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Æ÷Àå82š

2 佛敎學報 第 48 輯 서도 이 목적을 준수하였다. 즉 석문의범 에는 승가의 일상의례 보다는 각종의 재 의식에 역점을 두었다. 재의식은 승가와 재가가 함께 호흡하는 공동의 場이므로 포 교와 대중화에 무엇보다 중요한 역할을 수행할 수 있다는 믿음을 지니고 있었다. 둘째

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

IKC43_06.hwp

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: LiD(Learning in Depth)

<5B D B3E220C1A634B1C720C1A632C8A320B3EDB9AEC1F628C3D6C1BE292E687770>

272 石 堂 論 叢 49집 기꾼이 많이 확인된 결과라 할 수 있다. 그리고 이야기의 유형이 가족 담, 도깨비담, 동물담, 지명유래담 등으로 한정되어 있음도 확인하였 다. 전국적인 광포성을 보이는 이인담이나 저승담, 지혜담 등이 많이 조사되지 않은 점도 특징이다. 아울

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.251-273 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.27.2.201706.251 : 1997 2005 Research Trend Analysis on the Korean Alternative Education and School - focused on 1997 to 2015 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper were to analyze the research trend of alternative education and school in Korea so that we can make recommendations for future research. Method: To achieve this purpose, we selected 247 articles from 1997 to 2105 focusing on alternative education and analyzed them by the publishing year, objectives, targets, methodology, subject. Results: The key outcomes are follows: First, on research publication, the number of articles significantly increased from 2003 to 2006. However, from 2006 to 2007, they abruptly decreased. The total number of articles in 2015 increased almost more than fourfold compared to the number in 1997. Second, most of the research was targeted at overall learners without the learner type and age limit. On the alternative school, most of research(52.2%) was performed without giving the type. Third, on the research objectives, practice oriented papers(52.2%) were a little bit more than the theory oriented(49.4%). On the research methods, the literature review(47.8%) and the qualitative analysis(23.5%) were the major ones. Fourth, on the research subjects, generally it was led by education concept(24.3%) rather than education contents(3.5%) and methods(0.4%). Conclusion: In the beginning, research trends related to alternative education was focused on theoretical study. But over time, most of the research has been paying more attention to new contents and practical implementation. Although this change is the essential part of alternative education, there should still be more researches on the purpose and the philosophical discussions of alternative education. Key words: alternative education, alternative school, research of alternative education, research of alternative school Corresponding author: Kim, Young-Hwan. Pusan National University, Dept. of Education, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, Korea; e-mail: 001@alcob.org

I. 20 1997 2014 4 260. 1).. (, 2002, 21;, 2006 ), (, 2006).,., (, 2006). (, 2005)., (, 2003)., 20 (, 2014)., (,, 2001;, 2014;, 2006 ), (,,,, 2014;, 2014), (, 2006;,, 2010), (, 2005;, 2015;, 2004;, 2006;, 2015).. 30 (, 2014). 20,. 1997 7. 1) 260. 30, 230 (, 2014 7 11 ).

., 20.,., (2005), (2007),,. (2002),.. (2005). () (, 2014)., ( ). (, 2014). 1997 2015 20...,,,.,.,..,?,,?,,?,?,.

1997 2015 1997..... (, 2007). (, 2004). () (, 2006). (, 2005) (,, 2010). (2014) /.,. (2015) (2015) /.,.,., /. 1998,.., (2009),,,,

. (2007),.,., (2010),,, (2014),. (2015),, ( ) ( ),,,.. (2015),,,,,.,. ( ) ( ).,. < -1>. (2004) /,, (, ), ( (2009), ),,, (), (2010),,, (), (2014),, ( ) (, (2015),,, ) (2015) (2015) (),,,,, (, ), (,,,, )

1995 (, 2004). 1987 1990,,, (2009) 1992 CNN. 1995 5 31 2) (, 2014).,. 1996 10 (, 2007). 1990 (, 2006). 1998,. (, 2006). (2010) 3. 1 1998 2 76 91 3). 2 60 3 4) 2005 3 2007 6. 2 2) 1995 5 31. 3) ( ) (,,, 2006). 4) 603 (), ( ) 211, 232 3, 24 26, 29 304 26, 29 304 307.. (,,, 2006).

3. 2009 11 5 2014 12 9 25840 ().. (2010). 2014 12 9 16 ( ), 2.... (2000),,. (2004). (2014).,, 3,,..,, (2009). (2008),. (2008).

. KDC. < -2>, < -3>. KDC KDC KDC (%) 370 > 119 43.3 230 > 35 12.8 330 >, 25 9.1 180 > 6 2.2 001 > 5 1.8 84 30.8 274 100% KDC 8 8 4, 1, 1 7 1 2 1 6 3 3 1 4 1, 2 4 1 2 2 4 < -2>, < -3>... < -2>, < -3> (,, 2014;,,, 2015),,,, 5 1 2.

1 (, ),,. 2(2014). 2, (2009),, (2010), (2015). 1,, 2 (),,,, (),,,, (2000) (2014). 5) 1 1997 2015 2 (2004), (2006), (2013), (2013) (2001),,,, (2008) (2006) (2006),,,,,, 3, (2008),, (2006) (2013) (2006) ( ) (2004) (2011), (2012) (2004), (2008) 4, (2015), (2015),, (2015), (2015),, (2014) (2004), (2006) (), (2011), (2014) (2006) 5 (2014) (2008) () (2005), (2006) (2006),, (2010) 5),,,, (2000),,.

.,. DB(www.riss.kr),, (). 1 3,093 1997 2015 247.,,,,,., 1 3,093.,.,,,, 5 < -1>. 1 1997 ~ 2015 19997 2015 19 2, (,, ), (),, 3,,,,,,

( ),, 3 2005 60 3, ( ),,,,, 4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (),, 5 (),,,,,,,,,,,,, (2005),, (2015). 247 3 2. 10, < -1>. 3 247. 2. 1, 2

... 1997. 2003 2006 1997 3 9. 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 3 9 7 6 13 11 10 17 23 27 14 6 8 5 10 22 19 15 22 247. 2003 7, 2005 3 2, 2006 3, 2007 6 28 ( 20116 ). 2009 2010 2015.

(,, (, )), (,, ) < -1>. (81%), (8.9%), (8.1%), 2.0%. (81%) 56.7%.. 90,, 19 0 0 0 19 17 0 0 0 1 1 19 1997 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1998 9 0 0 0 9 7 0 0 0 1 1 9 1999 7 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 2000 36 3 1 0 40 26 0 1 7 6 0 40 2000 6 0 0 0 6 5 0 1 0 0 0 6 2001 12 1 0 0 13 6 0 0 1 6 0 13 2002 10 0 1 0 11 7 0 0 4 0 0 11 2003 8 2 0 0 10 8 0 0 2 0 0 10 2000 54 8 3 2 67 39 6 0 7 11 4 67 2004 14 3 0 0 17 10 1 0 3 3 0 17 2005 16 4 2 1 23 14 1 0 1 5 2 23 2006 24 1 1 1 27 15 4 0 3 3 2 27 2000 23 2 1 2 28 12 4 2 4 6 0 28 2007 11 2 0 1 14 6 1 2 3 2 0 14 2008 4 0 1 1 6 1 2 0 1 2 0 6 2009 8 0 0 0 8 5 1 0 0 2 0 8 2010 43 4 0 9 56 29 5 6 4 7 5 56 2010 4 0 0 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 2 5 2011 8 1 0 1 10 7 3 0 0 0 0 10 2012 18 2 0 2 22 11 1 4 1 4 1 22 2013 13 1 0 5 19 8 1 2 3 3 2 19 2010 25 3 0 9 37 17 1 5 9 4 1 37 2014 11 0 0 4 15 5 1 2 4 3 0 15 2015 14 3 0 5 22 12 0 3 5 1 1 22 200 20 5 22 247 140 16 14 31 35 11 247 (%) 81.0 8.1 2.0 8.9 100.0 56.7 6.5 5.7 12.6 14.2 4.5 100.0

Pearson 44.507 25.010 14.2%, 12.6%, 6.5%, 5.7%. (< -2>), Pearson 44.507, =0.010,., 1998 6 2004 2006. 2005 3 24 60 2. 6) 4.5%.. < -3> (Pearson 83.434, =0.000). 90 00 00 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 6 1 00 10 10 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 2 2 2 5 1 3 1 0 35 8 27 27 (10.9%) Pearson 83.434 10.000 6) [ ] 60 3 () (, 2006).

2005., (2004), (2006). (10.9%). (< -5>), (49.4%), (50.6%) (47.8%), (23.5%), (21.9%), (6.9%). 1997 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 1998 8 1 9 7 0 2 0 9 1999 7 0 7 7 0 0 0 7 2000 5 1 6 5 0 0 1 6 2001 11 2 13 11 1 0 1 13 2002 9 2 11 8 1 2 0 11 2003 8 2 10 8 0 2 0 10 2004 8 9 17 8 5 4 0 17 2005 13 10 23 14 5 3 1 23 2006 13 14 27 13 2 12 0 27 2007 7 7 14 5 5 3 1 14 2008 2 4 6 2 4 0 0 6 2009 5 3 8 5 0 0 3 8 2010 2 3 5 2 0 1 2 5 2011 4 6 10 3 5 2 0 10 2012 5 17 22 4 8 5 5 22 2013 4 15 19 4 9 4 2 19 2014 5 10 15 5 5 5 0 15 2015 3 19 22 4 4 13 1 22 122 125 247 118 54 58 17 247 (%) 49.4 50.6 100 47.8 21.9 23.5 6.9 100

.,,,,., ((),,,, ()),. () () 1997 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1998 4 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 9 1999 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 7 2000 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 2001 5 0 0 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 13 2002 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 2 1 11 2003 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 10 2004 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 4 17 2005 4 3 0 0 0 1 4 0 7 4 23 2006 4 5 1 2 4 2 6 3 0 0 27 2007 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 6 14 2008 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 6 2009 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 2010 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 2011 4 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 10 2012 3 10 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 7 22 2013 1 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 19 2014 2 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 7 15 2015 2 9 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 5 22 60 58 1 7 8 7 42 12 11 41 247 (%) 24.3 23.5 0.4 2.8 3.2 2.8 17.0 4.9 4.5 16.6 100 24.3%

() 23.5%. 17%. 0.4%.. (16.6%),. < -8>, Pearson 109.325, =0.020. () / / / 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 53 60 8 1 5 1 7 0 7 7 2 20 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 8 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 7 10 1 7 0 4 0 6 0 1 13 42 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 9 0 4 0 2 1 3 7 1 14 41 37 2 20 1 17 1 19 17 4 129 247 (%) 15.0 0.8 8.1 0.4 6.9 0.4 7.7 6.9 1.6 52.2 100

Pearson 109.325 81.020 (52.2%). 24.3%. 23.8%... 1997 2015 274,,,,., 2003 2006 1997 3 9. 2009 2010 2015., (,, (, )), (,, ) (81%), (8.9%), (8.1%), 2.0%.,.., (,,,, 2014).. 3. 52.2% (15.0%),

(,,, ) 7.7%,, (6.9%).,,., (49.4%), (50.6%) (47.8%), (23.5%), (21.9%), (6.9%)., 24.3% () 23.5%. 0.4% (16.6%),. Pearson 109.325, =0.020 (52.2%).,.,,.,...,. ( ).., (). ( ).,

,. 4.,. ( ).....,..,?., (Deschooling Society) (Opportunity Web) Self Organized Learning Environment (SOLE)?.,,, (2000).. (2), 179-214.,,, (2014).. 169-201. (2006).. (3), 89-120. (2011).. 1-23. (2015).. 55-87., (2001). ''. 1-17. (2003).. (2), 129-154.

(2014).?. (3), 63-97., (2013). :. 51-77. (2013).,,. 51-63. (2002).. (1), 87-105. (2006).. 45-66., (2005).. 89-112. (2007).. :. (2005).. (2), 23-41., (2011).. (2), 237-256. (2005).. 33-56.,,,, (2008). -. (4), 257-279. (2007).. 121-143. (2006). ''. (1), 211-229. (2015). :. (2), 61-85. (2014).. (2), 163-181. (2003).. 16-23. (2015). - -. (2), 71-95. (2004).. (2), 31-56. (2008).. (1), 163-188.,,, (2005).. (4), 229-254. (2014).. 193-215. (2012).

. (3), 343-364., (2014).. (3), 43-65.,, (2015). : 2005 2014. (3), 181-208. (2014).. (2), 1-19. (2006). -. (3), 23-47.,, (2009). 20 10,. (4), 47-62., (2009).. (6), 237-248. (2006).. (1), 1-19., (2001).. (1), 99-120.,, (2006).., 306-316. :., (2006).. (2), 89-100. (2006).. (1), 61-67. (2015). -. 459-483. (2015).. (1), 147-174., (2010).. (1), 169-197. (2007). :. (2014. 07. 11). 17. http://daily.hankooki.com 2016 8 2. : 2017.5.7 / : 2017.5.18 / : 2017.6.20

: 1997 2005 :. : 1997 2015 247,,,,. :., 2003 ~2006, 2007 ~2009 2010 ~2015., (81%), (8.9%), (8.1%)., (52.2%), (15.0%), (7.7%)., (50.6%) (49.4%), (47.8%), (23.5%), (21.9%), (6.9%)., (24.3%), (3.5%), (0.4%). :,,..