Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

부산교육 311호

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: Exploring Education

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

歯1.PDF

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * The Meaning of Pl

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

01.여경총(앞부분)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )


¿ï¸²58È£

γ

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review


특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

KD hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design


,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

서론 34 2

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

1 4/7 2 4/11 3 4/12 4 4/18 5 4/20 6 5/3 7 5/18 8 5/26 9 6/2 10 6/7 11 6/ / / / / / / / /5 20 9/7 21 9/

<C1A4C0C75FC3CAB5EE5FB1B3BBE7BFEBC1F6B5B5BCAD28C3D6C1BE295B315D2E687770>

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

12이문규

2 I.서 론 학생들을 대상으로 강력사고가 해마다 발생하고 있다.범행 장소도 학교 안팎을 가리지 않는다.이제는 학교 안까지 침입하여 스스럼없이 범행을 하고 있는 현실 이 되었다.2008년 12월 11일 학교에 등교하고 있는 학생(여,8세)을 교회 안 화장 실로 납치하여

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

청소년 위기, 함께 나서야 합니다 작년부터 여성가족위원회 활동을 하며 우리 사회 문제 중 위기 청소년에 대한 문 제가 심각함을 느끼고 이 문제에 대한 종합적 대책이 필요하다는 생각을 하게 되었 습니다. 청소년을 보호하고 성장시키는데 있어서 가정에서 담당하던 청소년 교육

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<31342DC0CCBFEBBDC42E687770>


11¹ÚÇý·É

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

878 Yu Kim, Dongjae Kim 지막 용량수준까지도 멈춤 규칙이 만족되지 않아 시행이 종료되지 않는 경우에는 MTD의 추정이 불가 능하다는 단점이 있다. 최근 이 SM방법의 단점을 보완하기 위해 O Quigley 등 (1990)이 제안한 CRM(Continu

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

인문사회과학기술융합학회

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The obje

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

<5B D B3E220C1A634B1C720C1A632C8A320B3EDB9AEC1F628C3D6C1BE292E687770>

50-5대지05장후은.indd

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.243-268 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.27.1.201703.243 * - 2001 2015 - The Research Trends on Peer Counseling in Elementary and Secondary Education in Korea - The Research for the Years 2001 to 2015 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the research trends on peer counseling of the elementary, middle and high school in Korea from the 2001 to 2015. Method: For this, 136 degree thesis and journal articles were selected through KERIS & National Assembly Library. According to the frame of analysis based upon previous research, these studies were categorized into six parts such as the number of studies, research method, subjects, research contents, dependent variables, purpose of program intervention. Results: First, the number of studies increased from 2003 to 2007, and reduced from 2008 to 2012, and then increased from 2013. Second, most of research methods were conducted by experiments(82.3%). Third, by the subjects of researches, elementary school students of dependent variables were self concept(24.2%), interpersonal relationships and communication and social property were followed. Sixth, most of purposes of program intervention were prevention(86.7%), the next were problem solving(13.3%). Conclusion: Future research should address studies on peer counseling for more various types of student problems need to be conducted. Key words : peer counseling, research trend, elementary, middle and high school * (2016). Corresponding Author: Kim, Hyun-Sook, Silla University, Dept. of Education, Baegyang-daero 700, Sasang-gu, Busan, Korea, e-mail: khs@silla.ac.kr

.. 1960 (,,, 1994),.., (growth and prevention model) (outreach program).. (,,,,, 1995). 1980. 1990 1994 (, ). 2012., 1980 (,, 2004). 1990 (, 2013), 2000.,, (,, 2004;, 2013;,, 2015), (,,, 2016;, 2014), (, 2007;, 2004;, 2015;,, 2014), (, 2002), (, 2004).

. 1990-2003 36 (,, 2004), 2004-20012 60 (, 2013), 2000-2015 62 (,, 2015),,. (2015) (,,, 2000). 2000 2001 2015 161, 70 231, 2000 2015 62.,,, (, 2011).,, (,, 2007). (,, 2004;, 2013).,,. 2000, 2001 2015.. (,,,,, ).

. 2001 2015. (RISS)...,. 2001 2015 231,, 187. (RISS) 136. (,,,, 2010), (, 2011;,, 2004;, 2013), (,,, 2014). (,,,, 2010),,,, (,, 2004),,,,,,,. (2013) 2004 2012,,,,. (2011),, (,,, 2014),,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,,,

,,... 2001 2015 < -1>. 136 92, 3, 41 2. 2003 2007 2 2008 2012. 2013 2015. (%) 2001 1 7 8 5.9 2002 3 5 8 5.9 2003 7 8 15 11.0 2004 4 12 16 11.8 2005 3 10 13 9.6 2006 1 8 9 6.6 2007 5 10 15 11.0 2008 2 4 6 4.4 2009 2 3 5 3.7 2010 2-2 1.5 2011-5 5 3.7 2012-1 1 0.7 2013 3 9 12 8.8 2014 7 7 14 10.3 2015 1 6 7 5.1 41 95 136 100 (%) 30.1 69.9 100 136,,,

.,,,., < -2>. 112 (82.3%) 89 (65.4%) 23 (16.9%). (11.8%) (3.7%), (2.2%). / (69 61.6%) (1 ), (21 ). 22.,. (%) 2 1 3 2.2 8 8 16 11.8 23 66 89 65.4 5 18 23 16.9 3 2 5 3.7 41 95 136 100 (%) 30.1 69.9 100,, 133.,,,, < -3>. 50 (37.6%) 44 (33.0%), 29 (21.8%), 1 (0.8%), 5 (3.8%),

4 (3.0%).,. 3 1 3. 5 (16 32.0%) 6 (17 34.0%), 1 (13 29.5%) 2 (14 31.8%). 1 (18 62.0%), 3, 5.. 1. (%) 1 1 5-4 5 16(12.0) 33 36 19 1 - - 89(66.9) 13 5 5 - - - 23(17.3) 3 2 - - - - 5(3.8) 50 44 29 1 4 5 133(100) (%) 37.6 33.0 21.8 0.8 3.0 3.8 100,, < -4>. 2. 133 136 108 (79.4%) 19 (14.0%), 9 (6.6%). 112 84 (75.0%), 19 (17.0%), 9 (8.0%).,,.

(%) 31 41 29 7 108 79.4 15 4 - - 19 14.0 4 3 2-9 6.6 50 48 31 7 136 100 (%) 36.8 35.3 22.8 5.1 100,,, 136.,,,.,,. 1. 133 137 < -5>.. 119 (77.5%) 78 (57.4%). (7.4%), (6.6%), (5.1%),... 10%. (%) 3 2-2 7 5.1 23 33 22 1 79 57.7 20 8 5-33 24.1 4 2 1-7 5.1-2 4 5 11 8.0 50 47 32 8 137 100 (%) 36.5 34.3 23.4 5.8 100

136 < -6>.. 2003 2006., 2011. 2001-4 4 - - 8 2002-5 1-2 8 2003 1 8 4 1 1 15 2004 1 7 4 3 1 16 2005-8 2 3-13 2006-5 3 1-9 2007-9 3-3 15 2008-4 2 - - 6 2009-5 - - - 5 2010-2 - - - 2 2011 1 2 2 - - 5 2012 - - - - 1 1 2013 2 6 2 1 1 12 2014 2 8 3-1 14 2015 1 5 2 - - 7 7 78 32 9 10 136 (%) 5.1 57.4 23.5 6.6 7.4 100.. 219,,,,,,,, 9. 1. < -7>.,,,,,

,,,,,..,.,,,,..,,,, -, -,,..,,,.,,,.,. 24.2% 22.0%, 15.1%, 12.8%. 78%. (10.5%) (9.1%) 43... 1. 1. (2.7%), (2.7%),,. (%) 53 24.2 48 22.0 33 15.1 28 12.8 23 10.5 20 9.1 6 2.7 6 2.7 2 0.9 219 100

.,. < -8>. 98 (86.7%), 15 (13.3%). (%) 36 31.9 39 34.5 23 20.3 9 8.0 4 3.5 2 1.8 113 100 15. < -9>. 7 (46.7%) 2 (13.3%). 2 (13.3%).,,,, 1, 1. 3 1.,,, 1. 2.

(%) / (1), (1), (1), (2), (1), (1) 7 46.7 (,, )(1), (1), 2 13.3 - - - (1) (1) 2 13.3 (, ) (1) (1) 2 13.3, 20% (1) 15% (1) 2 13.3 15 100. 2001 2015. 136,,,,,., 136 92, 3, 41. 2001 2007 2. 1994 2000., 2005, 16% (, 2012). 2012, 2013 2012

., 112 (82.3%), 89 (65.4%), 23 (16.9%), (11.8%), (3.7%), (2.2%) 112 (82.3%).,,,., (,, 2004;, 2013;,, 2015),.,,,., 133 (37.6%) (33%), (21.8%). (2015 :5978, :3204, :2344, ). (4, 5, 6 ) 3 (, 2007).,.,,, (79.4%) (14.0%), (6.6%). (2015),.,.,, 119 (86.9%)

. (81.4%).,,. (57.7%),.. 2,,.,.., (,,, 2016), (,,,, 2015),.,,,.. (,, 2004;, 2013),,,.... 2004 2013. 2012., (2004), (2013), (, 2012), (, 2012)

. (, 2014),.., (86.7%) 13.3%..,,,, (,, 2014), (,, 2015),, (,, 2004)., 1980,,,,, (Boias & Myrick, 1999; Cox, 1999; Janine et al., 2016),.., (RISS).,,,,,,.,,,,., 1990 20,.., Wee Class Wee Center( ) 2009. Wee Class Wee Center (,

2013).,.,, (2012)..,, (1994).. 1-190.,,,, (1995).. 1-243.,, (2016).. (2), 305-327. (2012). :. 1-28. (2012).. (3), 5-17. (2011)... (2007)..., (2004).. (2), 3-10.,,, (2015). :. (2), 361-391. (2013). 2004 2012 -..,,,,, (2014).. (2), 363-381., (2007).. (1), 261-278.,, (2000).. (1), 75-92.,, (2014).. (2),

109-122., (2015).. (3), 87-110.,,, (2010). : ( ~2009). (2), 507-524. Boias, A. K., & Myrick, R. D. (1999). A peer facilitator led intervention with middle school problem-behavior students. Professional School Counseling, 3, 27-34. CoX, R. A. (1998). A guide to peer counseling. NC: Jason Aronson. Janine, G. D., Caroline, B. L., Lynne, W., Jennifer, W., Path, S., Lihong, Z., Matthew, C., Debra, H., & David, S. (2016). Peer-counseling for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: A randomized community/research collaboration trial. Cancer, 122(15), 2408-2417. : 2017.1.31 / : 2017.3.4 / : 2017.3.20

< > (2006)... (2004)..., (2010).. (1), 1-14. (2005).. (1), 1-17. (2015)... (2001). - -.. (2013)... (2008)... (2004).. 135-140. (2002)... (2002)..., (2007).. (1), 42-53. (2005)... (2007)..., (2014).. (1), 103-117. (2005)...

(2011)... (2004)... (2014).,.. (2003)... (2003)... (2002)... (2007)..., (2013).. (7), 45-74., (2005).. (1), 39-56. (2004)... (2005)... (2012). : CIPP.. (2013)... (2006)... (2013)... (2001)... (2007).. (2), 15-27.

(2007).. (3), 189-222., (2004).. (2), 3-10., (2007). - -. (1), 29-38. (2007).,.. (2001)... (2005)... (2014). -.., (2003).. (1), 17-30. (2008)... (2007)... (2006)... (2014).., 7-32. (2007)... (2003).. 93-98. (2007)... (2014).. 71-95. (2006)... (2006). -.

. (2004)... (2010).. 243-259.,,,,, (2014).. (1), 281-302. (2015)... (2007). -.. (2005)... (2004). (leader),..,, (2014).. (1), 123-148. (2003)... (2011)... (2005)... (2013)... (2006)... (2013). -2004 2012 -.. (2003)... (2003)... (2008).. (2), 169-180. (2001)..

. (2007)... (2008)... (2002)...,,,,, (2014).. (2), 363-381. (2003). -CA ( ) -. 211-238. (2014)... (2009)... (2006)... (2011)..., (2001).. (1), 215-224. (2009). - - (4), 253-279. (2014)... (2001)..., (2007).. (1), 261-278. (2011)... (2015)... (2002). -

-.. (2002).,. (4), 41-59. (2013)... (2011)... (2004). 1318. 211-216. (2005)... (2004)... (2007)... (2013)... (2003).. 82-99. (2005)... (2013)... (2004). - -.. (2003)... (2013)... (2003)... (2001)..., (2009).. (2), 79-92. (2015)..

., (2003).. (3), 291-308. (2014)..., (2013).. (3), 365-383. (2009)... (2009)... (2006)... (2004). 5.., (2008).. (1), 185-203. (2005)... (2002). (Gifted Underachiever). (1), 35-63., (2015). -. (1), 109-117. (2003)..., (2006). -,, -. 1-16. (2005)... (2004). -.., (2014). - -. (6), 2557-2579., (2003)..

(1), 116-125. (2004)... (2001)... (2004).,,.. (2002).. 87-93., (2003),. (2), 201-216., (2005).. (2), 415-433. (2004)... (2008)..., (2004).. (2), 85-99. (2014)...,, (2013).. 193-208. (2014). Socio Net.. (2007)... (2015)... (2015)...

* - 2001 2015 - : 2001 2015 15. : 136,,,,,,. :, 2003 2007 2008 2012 2013., 82.3%., (37.6%), (33.0%), (21.8%),.,, 85.0%, 10%., (24.2%),,,,., 86.7%, 13.3%. :.