Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: K-MOOC * An Explora

Similar documents
<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

ePapyrus PDF Document

인문사회과학기술융합학회

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

歯김길문.PDF

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

학교폭력사건 처리과정에 개입한 전문상담교사의 경험연구


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

(5차 편집).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

< FC3D6C1BEBCF6C1A45FB1E2B5B6B1B3B1B3C0B0B3EDC3D E687770>


상담학연구. 9., , 21..,,,,,,... (Corresponding Author): / / 154 Tel: /

Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The obje

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

레이아웃 1

AT_GraduateProgram.key

1..


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

레이아웃 1

PowerPoint Presentation

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN INSTITUTE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE Nov.; 26(11),

Output file

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

도비라

<353420B1C7B9CCB6F52DC1F5B0ADC7F6BDC7C0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120BEC6B5BFB1B3C0B0C7C1B7CEB1D7B7A52E687770>


05_최운선_53~67,68.hwp

1.장인석-ITIL 소개.ppt

PowerPoint 프레젠테이션

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

04김호걸(39~50)ok

원고스타일 정의

노영남

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

<C1DF3320BCF6BEF7B0E8C8B9BCAD2E687770>

<C1A4C0C75FC3CAB5EE5FB1B3BBE7BFEBC1F6B5B5BCAD28C3D6C1BE295B315D2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on the Recog


Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.147-171 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.29.2.201906.147 K-MOOC * An Exploratory Study on the Risk Factors and Protection Factors of K-MOOC Students' Learning Interruption Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the learning experiences of K-MOOC students in depth, and to explore operational methods for enhancing K-MOOC academic continuity by eliciting protection and risk factors that affect academic discontinuation. Method: We conducted in-depth interviews with 10 learners who had taken K-MOOC courses and had experience in interstudation and continued academic activities during the course, and conducted analyses using CQR(Consensual Qualitative Research). Results: Risk factors were divided into four areas, 11 sub-components, and protection factors were divided into five areas, 17 sub-components. Risk factors were shown as 'class content', 'class support', 'study characteristics' and 'class design'. The protection factors were shown as 'direct and indirect costs to study', 'how to study', 'learning motivation', 'knowledge availability' and 'class content'. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, a measure was proposed to prevent the risk factors of K-MOOC students from stopping their studies and to promote support for their protection. Key words : K-MOOC, Suspension of study, Continuing to study, Protection factors, Risk factors * 2017. Corresponding Author: Lim, I-Rang. University of Seoul, Office of Educational Innovation, Seoulsiripdaero 163, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, e-mail: dlfkddlfkd29@hanmail.net

. MOOC(Massive Open Online Course), (Edx), (Coursera), (Udacity) MOOC. MOOC,.,,,, -. MOOC. (Atiaja & Guerrero, 2016) (Lewin, 2012). MOOC, MOOC. MOOC,. MOOC MOOC (Flipped Learning),,,,,, (,,,, 2014;, 2016;,, 2017;, 2017; Tucker, Pursel & Divinsky, 2014; Yan, Muhua, Bonk, & Yuqing, 2015). MOOC (Blended Learning),, (Bruff, Fisher, McEwen, & Smith, 2013; Huang & Chen, 2016; Torres-Coronas & Vidal-Blasco, 2017). MOOC,. MOOC.,,,, MOOC (Baggaley, 2014; Fischer, 2014; Rai & Chunrao,

2016; Yan, Muhua, Bonk, & Yuqing, 2015). MOOC MOOC (Breslow et al., 2013). MOOC MOOC (Johnson-Farmer & Frenn, 2009; Kember, 2009)., 1-2 sampler 74%, 80% (Kizilcec, Piech, & Schneider, 2013), MOOC MOOC 3-6% (Breslow et al., 2013). K-MOOC( ) 2.6~3.03 (5 ) (, 2017). MOOC (Mazoue, 2014)., MOOC ( ) 10%. Jordan(2014) 39 MOOC 6.5%, Ho (2014) 3.2%, Impey, Wenger Austin(2015) 3%. K-MOOC 2016 18 2., 2015 265, 30 9255 2 7010 8.8% (, 2017.10.09).. MOOC. MOOC (,, 2017; Fini, 2009; Firmin et al., 2014; Impey, Wenger & Austin, 2015) (, 2016; Poellhuber, Roy, Bouchoucha, & Anderson, 2014; Wang & Baker, 2015). K-MOOC K-MOOC (, 2016;, 2016;, 2015;, 2016), K-MOOC, (,, 2017;, 2017;, 2016;,, 2017)..

MOOC, MOOC., MOOC MOOC. MOOC. MOOC,. K-MOOC,. K-MOOC, K-MOOC. K-MOOC,.., K-MOOC?, K-MOOC?. K-MOOC.. (Merriam, 2009). K-MOOC,.,,,,,,,., 10. 2017 11 4 2017 11 26,

(face-to-face) 1 1. (,, ), 50 60.. Case 1 32 13 5 7 Case 2 34 13 4 7 Case 3 42 START 15 5 Case 4 46 13 4 Case 5 26 16 3 Case 6 24 15 5 Case 7 28 13 4 Case 8 28 15 6 6 13 4 Case 9 26, 6 Case 10 40 14 3 10 MOOC, MOOC. MOOC 5, MOOC ( ). MOOC. 1 2, 3. 2, 1 3, (pilot test) K-MOOC 2. Krueger Casey(2000). (Opening questions), (Introductory questions), (Transition questions), (Key questions), (Ending questions),

. E-Mail.. (Hill, 2005).,..,,,. K-MOOC 10,. K-MOOC? K-MOOC? K-MOOC ()? K-MOOC? K-MOOC? K-MOOC? K-MOOC?? K-MOOC? K-MOOC?? K-MOOC? K-MOOC ( ),. (protocol)..,, < -3> 3(primary team)

CQR(Consensual Qualitative Research : ). Hill, Thompson Williams(1997). (primary team),. (auditor). K-MOOC 2. CQR. Primary 35 35 team 37 Auditor 53 (Organizing the Team) (primary team) (auditor) 1 2 (Developing Domains) (Constructing Core Ideas) 1 (Auditing) (Cross Analysis) (Representativeness to the Sample) 2 (Audit of Cross Analysis) (Charting the Results) (Stability Check)

. 1) 합의적질적분석 (CQR) 에대한안정성확인결과 CQR 2. 10 1. 10.,, (Hill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997)., 8, 11. (,, ),. 2) 합의적질적분석 (CQR) 최종결과 K-MOOC, 11, 17, 28. 4, 11, 5, 17.. 1 (General), 50% 2 (Typical), 2 50% (Variant). (General), (Typical), (Variant ), 1. < -1>, < -2>.

( ) (8) (7) (7) (7) (4) (5) (5) (3) / (5) (4) (3) ( ) (6), (5) (5) (6) / / (3) (3) (5) (5) (2)

( ) ( ) / (5) (5) / (2) / (8) (5) (4) (3) (2) 1) 수업내용,,.,.,.,.,?... ( G),..,.

..,,.,. ( H),.....,..,. ( E) 2) 수업지원,.,..,... UI. (). ( C),....

... ( J) 3) 학습자특성,,.,.......(). ( A),..,...,. ( E),.., MOOC. 3. () K-MOOC. ( D)

4) 수업설계 /,,., /....,.,. (),. ( B),..,.,..,.. ( F),...... MOOC..

. ( I) 1) 학습소요비용,,., MOOC.,.,. MOOC... ( F), MOOC,.,.,. PC. () MOOC. ( J), MOOC. MOOC..,.. MOOC,.. ( B)

2) 수업방법,,.,.,.,.,.. ( H),..,...,. ( D),.,..,..,. ( F)

3) 학습동기,,.,.,..... ( H),,...,... ( A),.,.... ( G) 4) 지식유용성,,

., MOOC.... (). ( E), MOOC..., MOOC.. ( J), MOOC,..... ( F) 5) 수업내용,,,,.,,.,.

,... ( H), MOOC... K-MOOC.. ( J), MOOC,... K-MOOC... ( H),, MOOC, MOOC. K-MOOC., K-MOOC. ( D), MOOC,.

.,.. ( C). K-MOOC, K-MOOC., 10, CQR., 4, 11, 5, 17. K-MOOC. K-MOOC,,,. K-MOOC.,., K-MOOC,.. K-MOOC. K-MOOC..,,,. Level..,

.., K-MOOC. K-MOOC. UI.,.,., K-MOOC.,,,. K-MOOC. K-MOOC... Social learning., K-MOOC.,,,,.,,., (,,,, ).,., K-MOOC

...,.,,.., K-MOOC.,..,.,., K-MOOC... MOOC 4 20% (Jordan, 2014), 16 K-MOOC.. K-MOOC 10,,.,.,,. 11 17 K-MOOC. K-MOOC.. ( )

. K-MOOC.,,, (2014). MOOC. (2), 149-151. (2017). K-MOOC.. (2016). MOOC,. 227-261., (2017). : MOOC. (11), 283-306. (2016). (K-MOOC). (2), 121-140., (2017). K-MOOC. (3), 125-154. (2016). MOOC(Massive Open Online Course),. (3), 121-129. (2017). MOOC., 82, 219-236. (2015). MOOC MOOC K-MOOC. (2), 227-251. (2017). K-MOOC. (2), 161-182. (2016). MOOC,,.., (2015). MOOCs. (4), 193-223., (2017). K-MOOC. (1), 185-207. (2016). K-MOOC. (2), 1-24. (2017.10.09.) K-MOOC,. http://news.unn.net/news/articleview.ht

ml?idxno=179927 2017.12.20. Atiaja, L. N., & Guerrero, R. S. (2016). MOOCs: origin, characterization, principal problems and challenges in higher education. Journal of E-Learning & Knowledge Society, 12(1), 65-76. Baggaley, J. (2014). MOOCS: Digesting the facts. Distance Education, 35(2), 159-163. Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of On line Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187-199. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13-25. Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5), 1-26. Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E. D., & Sujitparapitaya, S. (2014). Case study: Using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Education, 12(7), 94-115. Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 149-158. Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517-572. Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: an update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196-205. Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Emanuel, J., Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., Chuang, I., & Ho, A. D. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses, fall 2012-summer 2013. HarvardX and MITx Working Paper. Huang, J., & Chen, H. (2016). Practice of blended teaching and learning model based on MOOC for the course of agricultural ecology. Journal of Anhui agricultural Sciences, 44(19), 275-277. Impey, C. D., Wenger, M. C., & Austin, C. L. (2015). Astronomy for astronomical numbers: A worldwide mooc. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 57-79. Johnson-Farmer, B. & Frenn, M. (2009). Teaching excellence: what great teachers teach us. Journal of Professional Nursing, 25(5), 267-272. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133-160. Kember, D. (2009). Promoting Student-Centred Forms of Learning across an Entire University. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 58(1), 1-13.

Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170-179). ACM. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Groups (3rd ed). California: Sage publications. Lewin, T. (2012). Instruction for masses knocks down campus walls. The New York Times, March 4. Mazoue, J. G. (2014). The MOOC model: Challenging traditional education. EDUCAUSE Review Online, 28(2). Merriam. S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Poellhuber, B., Roy, N. Bouchoucha, I., & Anderson, T. (2014). The relationships between the motivational profiles, engagement profiles and persistence of MOOC participants. MOOC Research Initiative, Final Report. Rai, L., & Chunrao, D. (2016). Influencing factors of success and failure in MOOC and general analysis of learner behavior. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(4), 262-268. Torres-Coronas, T., & Vidal-Blasco, M. A. (2017). MOOC and Blended Learning Models: Analysis from a Stakeholders' Perspective. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(3), 88-99. Tucker, C., Pursel, B. K., & Divinsky, A. (2014). Mining Student-Generated Textual Data in MOOCs and Qunatifying Their Effects on Student Performance and Learning Outcomes. Computers In Education Journal, 5(4), 84-95. Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2015). Content or platform: why do students complete MOOCs?. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 17. Yan, L., Muhua, Z., Bonk, C. J. & Yuqing, G. (2015). Integrating MOOC and flipped classroom practice in a traditional undergraduate course: students' experience and perceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(6), 4-10. : 2019.05.08. / : 2019.05.13. / : 2019.06.20.

K-MOOC : K-MOOC, K-MOOC. : K-MOOC, 10, CQR(Consensual Qualitative Research). : 4, 11, 5, 17.,,,.,,,,. : K-MOOC.