Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.405-425 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.1.201803.405 * A Study on the Perceptions and Factors of Immigrant Background Youth About Support Policy in Multi-Cultural Education Purpose: It has been ten years since multi-cultural education support policies were introduced in South Korea. Method: This study set out to analyze what types of supports the subjects and beneficiaries of the policies chose, there were according to the student and parent factors with the data of Multi-cultural Adolescent Panel Survey(MAPS). Results: The analysis results show that the multi-cultural family support policies provided adolescents with the most support in the content of "cultural experience activities" in 2012 and "after-school tuition subsidies" in 2013~2015. The adolescents, who were the beneficiaries of the policies, had hopes for supports for "visit to a theme park" from the fifth grade to the seventh grade and for "subsidies for academy fees" in the eighth grade. The study examined the perceptions of subjects of multi-cultural family support policies among migrant adolescents and found that many of them said it would be better to provide supports regardless of household economy. Conclusion: Academic achievement, peer relations, and parent's monthly income had significant effects on the response, and self-esteem, relations with teachers, and learning activities had no statistically significant effects on it. Key words : Multicultural Educational Support Policies, Immigrant Background Youth, Multi-cultural Adolescent Panel Survey(MAPS), Logistic Regression *,. Corresponding Author: Ko, Eun-Sun. Dharma College, 30, Pildong-ro, 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea, e-mail: kes0720@dongguk.edu
.,. 2017 1.7%, OECD.,, 20%,,,, 10% (Nusche, 2009). OECD (Nusche, 2009).,. OECD, (,,,,, 2016).,, (, 2017). 10. 2006 2 2017 190 (, 2006, 2017). 2006.,., 10. (, 2016)... (one size fit for all). 1),,,,, 1). (, 2011:113)..
(, 2016).,,,,. 10 (Top-down),. (Donna & Philip, 2012).,.,.,..,.,.,,,,,..,??,,?,,?
., (Banks, 2009,, 2011: 3).,,,. Nieto(2009),,,,,,.. Bennett(2007),,., 2008., (, 2013:133).,,,.,,,.,.,.,..,. (Korean as a Second Language),,.
,.,. (, 2012). (, 2016),,,.,,,.,,,,,,. (,,, 2013).. (,,, 2013)...,,,,,,. 1) 정의적측면의자아존중감..
(,, 2017),. 2) 인지적측면의학업성취도., (,, 2009). Ogbu(1992),..,,. (,, 2011).. 3) 사회적측면의교우관계 교사관계 학습활동 (,,,, 2006), (,, 2014), (, 2011),, (, 2016). (,,,, 2006), (, 2011). (,, 2014). 4) 경제적측면의부모월소득 Coleman
.,,. (,,, 2013).. 1) 조사대상, (MAPS). 2011 2016,,, /. 1, 2012 ( 5) 2015 ( 2), 2 3 2014 ( 1) 2015( 2). 2) 관련변인 (1) Coopersmith (1992) 1 5 Likert 5,. Cronbach s α.81. (2) 2015,
,,, 1 5 Likert 5. Cronbach s α.79. (3) (,, ),, (1991) 1 4 Likert 4. Cronbach s α.78, Cronbach s α.62, Cronbach s α.82. (4) (, 2011)..,., VIF 10. < -1>., (p<.01),, (p<.05). < -2>., (p<.01).
1. 1 2..221 ** 1 3..084 *.422 ** 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4..060.400 **.259 ** 1 5..124 **.428 **.331 **.453 ** 1 6..091 *.529 **.496 **.437 **.487 ** 1 7..048.067.145 **.073.018.062 1 (M) 1.40 3.20 3.10 2.90 3.11 2.78 240.10 (SD).49.55.75.39.59.44 110.10 * p<.05, ** p<.01 1. 1 2. -.011 1 3..085 **.391 ** 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4..010.505 **.348 ** 1 5..003.419 **.320 **.503 ** 1 6..033.480 **.620 **.507 **.520 ** 1 7..072 **.034.135 **.080 ** -.003.046 1 ** p<.01 (M) 1.41 3.17 3.09 3.38 3.09 3.07 246.11 (SD).49.53.74.39.56.53 130.03. 1) 학교 / 기관에서지원받은종류와희망하는지원종류분석 /, 2012( 5) 1,502 2,395,
233.2%. (,,,, ) 42.7% /. 2013( 6) 1,446 1,604, 204.1% ( ) 36.4%. 2014( 1) 1,383 871, 201.6% ( ) 35.0%. 2015( 2) 1,348 744, 180.1%. ( ) 33.9%. 2012( 5), 2013( 6) 2015( 2) /., 2012( 5) 1,502 5,561, 373.5%. 60.0%. 2013 ( 6) 1,446 4,884, 341.1%. 53.6%. 2014 ( 1) 1,383 4,608, 336.4%. 39.7%. 2015 ( 2) 1,348 4,260, 318.9%. 35.2%. 2012( 5) 2014 ( 1), 2015 ( 2). / < -1>,,, 2015 ( 2), 2012 ( 5).
< -2>,, 2012 ( 5), 2015 ( 2).. (2016) ( ).,.,. 2) 중복적으로제시된지원과중복적으로지원받은현황, 2012( 5) 1,502 534, 182.9%. ( ) 44.5%. 2013 ( 6) 1,446 580, 195.9%. ( ) 36.1%. 2014 ( 1) 1,383 329, 179.8%. ( ) 36.6%. 2015 ( 2) 1,348 278, 165.5%. (
) 34.5%. 2012( 5) 2015 ( 2) ( )., 2012( 5) 1,502 492, 168.5%. ( ) 42.5%. 2013 ( 6) 1,446 488 164.9%. ( ) 31.1%. 2014 ( 1) 1,383 283, 154.6%. ( ) 31.1%. 2015 ( 2) 1,348 255, 151.8%. ( ) 31.5%. 2012( 5) 2015 ( 2) ( ). / < -3>, ( ), (,,,, ) 2012 ( 5), 2014( 1), 2015 ( 2). < -4> /.
(, 2013)... 1,635 < -1> 269 (47.3%), 300 (52.7%) 569., 336 (59.1%), 233 ((40.9%). n % 336 59.1 233 40.9 569 100.0,, < -2>., (-2LL= 731.95, =32.11, df=6, p<.000), 63.80%., (Wald=19.95, p<.001).., (,, 2007).
*** p<.001 B SE Wald Exp(B) Exp(B) 95% C.I..925 ***.207 19.954 2.521 1.680 3.782 -.028.139.041.972.741 1.277 -.265.273.944.767.450 1.309.256.184 1.950 1.292.902 1.852 -.212.269.621.809.478 1.370.001.001.822.1.001.999 1.002-2Log Likelihood 731.948 (df), P 32.105(6),.000 Prediction rate 63.8% 1,635 < -3> 633 (48.8%), 664 (51.2%) 1,297., 764 (58.9%), 533 ((41.1%). n % 764 58.9 533 41.1 1,297 100.0,, < -4>.
(-2LL=1,739.37, =17.29, df=6, p<.01), 60.1%., (Wald=7.81, p<.01), (Wald=.4.23, p<.01).,.. (,,, 2013)... (2016).,,,. ** p<.01 B SE Wald Exp(B) Exp(B) 95% C.I. -.183.133 1.904.833.642 1.080.279 **.100 7.806 1.322 1.087 1.608.001.186.000 1.001.694 1.442 -.021.128.027.979.762 1.258 -.028.161.030.972.710 1.332.001 **.001 4.233 1.001 1.000 1.002-2Log Likelihood 1,739.372 (df), P 17.290(6),.008 Prediction rate 60.1%
. 10,.,,.,.,,,,,,. 2012, 2013 2015. 5 1, 2.,.. (59.1%),. 40.9%,. (58.9%).,,,,,.. (Thing),.,,,..,.,
,. 10..,. OECD..,.,,,.. (,,, 2014)...
(2017). 2017 (2017.1.12.). :. (2006). (2006.5.1.). :. (2014).. (1), 29-50. (2016). :.. (2017).. (2), 371-393. (2013).. (4), 67-95., (2011).. (3), 19-57., (2011).. (1), 3-12. (2013).. (4), 131-149. (1991)..., (1992). Methylphenidate,,. (1), 235-249. (2011).. (6), 1-27., (2014).. (2), 35-57.,, (2014).,,, :. (1), 127-142. (2011). :. (2), 87-120. (2011). :. (4), 231-254.,, (2013). :.,,,, (2016). :., (2017).
:., (2009). :. (2), 1-16. (2011).. (1), 111-131. (2006).,,. (1), 197-218. (2016). :., (2007).,,. (3), 169-183., (2011).. (1), 55-87., (2014).. (3), 161-179. (2012). :.. (2015). -,..,,, (2006). :. (2004).. (2), 55-75. (2011).. (3), 1-29., (2012). :. (2012). :?. (1), 113-143 (2013). :. 53-81. Apple, M. W. (1979).,. :. Banks, J. A. (2008).,,,. :. Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. (2009).,,. :. Bennett, C. I. (2007).,,,,,,,,,. :. Equality of Educational Opportunity (1966). Donna, G., & Philip, C. C. (2012). Multicultural Education in a Pluralistic Society. 9th Edition. Pearson.
John, U. O. (1992). Understanding Cultural Diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, 21(8), 5-24. Nusche, D. (2009). What works in migrant education? A review of evidence and policy options. OECD Education Working Paper No. 22. Sonia, N. (2009).,,,,,,,,. :. Will, K. (2002).,,,. :. Sleeter, C., & Grant, C. (1994). Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender (2nd edition). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. : 2018.02.05. / : 2018.02.12. / : 2018.03.20.
: 10.,. : (MAPS),,.,,,. : 2012, 2013 2015..,,. :,.