Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: * A Study on the Re

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * An Analysis of Diffe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti


., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel


(5차 편집).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

한국교양교육학회/전국대학교양교육협의회/한국교양기초교육원 주최 2015 추계전국학술대회 프로그램 주제 교양교육의 : 당면과제와 전망 일시 : 2015년 11월 20일(금) 14:00~19:00, 21일(토) 09:00~17:00 장소 : 경남대학교 1공학관(공과대학 6층

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>


노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.1-22 DOI: * An Analysis of the Ext

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

1..

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

<C1A63236B1C72031C8A328C6EDC1FDC1DF292E687770>


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met


118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: The Exploratory Stu


歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

ePapyrus PDF Document


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

<C1DF3320BCF6BEF7B0E8C8B9BCAD2E687770>

ePapyrus PDF Document



인문사회과학기술융합학회

서론 34 2

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp.137-158 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.27.3.201709.137 * A Study on the Relationship between College students Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions and the Generalizability by students characteristics Purpose: This study was to analyze the relationships of critical thinking skills and disposition to think critically of college students. In addition, this study tried to determine whether there are differences depending on the students characteristics. Method: The sample was 231 students from A universities who were participated in both diagnoses. To solve the research problems, this study employed confirmatory factor analysis and multiple group analysis. Results: The result did not show statistically significant relationship between critical thinking skills and disposition of college students. Additionally, these relationships can be generalized by students characteristics. However, relationships of some of the sub constructs in 4 grade were statistically significant. Conclusion: The relationship of the sub constructs by critical thinking skills and disposition may result in the adjustment effects of the school year. Therefore, school year should be considered when developing a program that can be promoted both the critical thinking skills and disposition of college students. Key words : critical thinking disposition, critical thinking skills, student characteristics * 3 K-CESA. Corresponding Author: Park, Ji Hoe. Sungkyunkwan University, Dept. of Education, Sungkyunkwan-ro, Joungno-gu, Seoul, Korea, e-mail: jihoe27@naver.com

.,,,. 2008 OECD (AHELO: Assessment of higher education learning outcomes, AHELO) (, 2015;,,, 2011;,,, 2013).,. OECD AHELO. AHELO (generic skills),,,. OECD,, (Nusche, 2007). 2007.,,...(, 2005; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005)., (,, 2006;, 2006; Facione, 1990)., ( ) ( ). (ability or skills) (disposition) (, 2011).. (, 2009;,, 2015;,,,, 2009; Facione, Facione, & Sanchez, 1994; Profetto-McGrath, 2003) (,

, 2006;,,, 2005).,..,,, (, 2015). (,, 2006;,, 2015;, 2005; Farley & Elmore, 1992; McMillan, 1987; Pascarela & Terenzini, 2005; Wilson, 1989). 4. (intended learning outcomes) (self-reported) (, 2007),. K-CESA(Korea Collegiate Essential Skills Assessment),..,,,.,,,..,,,. 2.,?,?

. (critical thinking), (, 2005; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005). (J. Dewey), 1990 (Delphi Report).,,,,,,,, (, 2011).. (,, 2006;, 2006; Facione, 1990),. Siegel(1991) ( ) ( ), (ability or skills) (disposition) (, 2011).. (, 2006;, 2011; Paul, 1982; Ruggiero, 1984; Siegel, 1991)..,,, (, 2002). (Bloom, Englehart, Furst, Hill, & Krathwohl, 1956), (,,,,, 2002; Facione, 1990; Swartz & Perkins, 1990), (,,,, 2011).,,,, (2002), 7,,,.,, (2011)

,,,,,,..,,. (critical thinking skills) (disposition to think critically), (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005).. (, 2009;,, 2015;,,,, 2009; Facione, Facione & Sanchez, 1994; Profetto-McGrath, 2003) (,, 2006;,,, 2005). (2009).. Profetto-McGrath(2003). (2015).2(p<.001)...,,.

,. (value-added).. (,, ), (,,, ), (, ) (, 2015)., (,, 2006;, 2005; Pascarela & Terenzini, 2005) (,, 2015; Profetto-McGrath, 2003). (,, 2006) (Rodzalan & Saat, 2015), (, 2005).,, (,, 2006). (Farley & Elmore, 1992; McMillan, 1987; Wilson, 1989), (,, 2015). 4.,, -.., (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005).,.,.

.,.,.,..., A. A (,,,, 2015). A,,, (,,,,, 2015;,,,, 2015).,, (2015a, 2015b) A,,, 4.,,,,,,,., K-CESA,.

,.. K-CESA,,.,, (, 2016). K-CESA,,, 4 (,,, 2011).,,,.,, ( ),,.,,.,,,, (, 2016).,,,..., [ III-1].

(,, 2009;,, 2012;,,,,, 1991; Piirto, 1992; Urban, 1995).. (,, 2006;, 2005; Terenzini, Springer, Pascarella, & Nora, 1995) (,,, ). A 2~4. (2016 6 20 2016 8 4 ) 1, 1. A K-CESA 2. 1.,,, 744 10.77%. 2 (K-CESA: Korea collegiate essential skills assessment, K-CESA), 2016 9 20 10 10

. (62 ), (1 ), (24 ). 1 744 2 231 < III-1>. 1, 2. 2 (%) 1 (%) (%) 231 (100) 744 (100) 15303 (100) 125 106 (54.1) (45.9) 334 410 (44.9) (55.1) 8423 6880 (55.0) (45.0) 2 3 4 43 116 72 (18.6) (50.2) (31.2) 202 233 309 (27.2) (31.3) (41.5) 3448 3556 4505 (30.0) (30.9) (39.1) 1) ( ) 123 108 (53.2) (46.8) 301 154 (66.2) (33.8) 6472 2917 (68.9) (31.1),,, (2015),,, (2015),,, (2015a, 2015b) A (self-reported)., 2, 4 2016. 2006 2010 K-CESA. K-CESA,. K-CESA 4 (4 45 ). 1) 비판적사고성향 1) < 1>.

,.,,,,,, (,,,, 2015b). < III-2>. 9, 9, 7, 5 5 ( 1 ~ 5 ).. (,,, 2015a, 2015b). 3.56~4.28,.667~.995 4.28 8 ( ).667. ( ).487~.660,.509~.673,.616~.734,.669~.701. Cronbach s α.778( :.781),.781( :.788),.775( :.775),.732( :.733). 30.922( :.924). 2) 비판적사고기능 (ability or skills),,,. K-CESA (higher-order thinking skills) 4 2 8. 2 (, 2011). K-CESA Cronbach s α.954 2).,,,,,, 2).

. A / ( )/ / ( ) / / / ( ) / / (acknowledging alternative explanations/viewpoints), / / /, / / K-CESA (analysis and synthesis (drawing conclusions) of evidence),,, ( ) / / (evaluation of evidence),, IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0 AMOS 21.0..,,,.

I. 1) 연구모형의타당도. (n=231) 2.. 5.0 (Bollen, 1989), RMSEA.05,.10 (Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2005), TLI CFI.9.. TLI CFI SRMR 26.603 21.032.972.985.050 RMSEA (LO90~HI90).058 (.017~.093).5 (convergent validity).. (AVE: average variance extracted).7. : 9.866.069 14.439.000 : 9.825.070 13.698.000 : 7.838.073 13.907.000 : 5.796 - -.000.636.221 6.499.000.609.212 6.345.000.813.209 6.851.000.536 - -.000

( ) 0.006.007.971.332-0.007 0.007 0.971.332 0.002 0.006-1.136.256-0.01 0.008 0.268.789 0.006 0.007-1.477.140 2) 연구모형의교차타당도,,,.,,,. 3),.. Model Measurement weights 6 4.50.609 12 8.08.779 12 10.2.599 6.43.999 Structural covariances 3 10.3.016 6 5.43.490 6 3.59.732 3 9.42.024 Measurement residuals - - - 24 39.2.026 24 34.5.077 - - - 3) 3.19, 3.19 3.62, 3.62.. ( ) 3.19 ( ) 3.19 3.62 ( ) 3.62 ( ) 79 78 74 34.2 33.8 32.0 231 100.0

(n=231). Measuremet weights,, Structural covariances, < IV-4>.., 4 (-.037, p<.05) (.028, p<.05). 2 3 4.137.034.069.069.069.072.072.072.097 -.005 -.158 -.131.042 -.080 -.131 -.085 -.028 -.287 -.037 -.174.089.000 -.220 -.045.312**.223 -.055 -.175 -.102.154 -.183 -.037.177 -.025 -.407** -.171 -.062 -.132 -.060 -.165.112.038 -.107.039.196.129.098 -.028.057.127 ** <.05

.,,,,. 2 A 2~4 A K-CESA. 231., (multiple group analysis),. (2006),, (2005). 4,. 4,. (2009).. (,, 2015), (, 2009), (,, 2006;,,, 2005).., (, 2006; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005) (,, 2015). (, 2008)...

4..,, (,,,,, 2012), 18 35 (McCabe, Roediger, McDaniel, Balota, & Hambrick, 2010).... (, 2009). (2009).,,....,,, (,, 2011;,,, 2010).,. K-CESA,...,

,.,.,.,,.,.,,., (2006).. (3), 1-25.,,,,, (2009). (09-R19-3). :.,,,, (2002). (RRE, 3). :. (2006).. (1), 89-117., (2007). Rasch K. (2), 101-124., (2013).. (4), 139-172. (2011). H. Siegel. 271-292. (2010).,. (2), 129-139. (2015). -AHELO. (3), 109-131.,, (2005).. (2), 382-389.

,, (2015a). :.,, (2015b). :., (2015).. (6), 197-203.,,, (2011). (LCT-CMB). (4), 791-809., (2011).. (1), 63-112., (2009).. (2), 125-147 (2013).. 407-442.,,,, (2012).. (2), 127-148.,,,, (2015). :.,,, (2015). :.,, (2016).. (10), 795-824.,,, (2011).. (5), 435-458.,,, (2009). :., (2012).. 69-94. (2007). (2007- -30). :.,, (2011).. (4), 461-486.,, (2013). (V, RR 2013-21). :.

(2008).. 91-117. (2016). :.,,,, (1991). ( RR 91-18). :. (2013).. (2), 119-141. (2005).. (2), 240-251. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green. Facione, N. C., Facione, P. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (1994). Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 33(8), 345-350. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Millbrae, CA: California Academic. Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44, 1-25. Farley, M. J. & Elmore, P. B. (1992). The relationship of reading comprehension to critical thinking skills, cognitive ability, and vocabulary for a sample of underachieving college freshmen. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 921-931. McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A., Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and Executive Functioning: Evidence for a Common Executive Attention Construct. Neuropsychology, 24(2), 222 243. McMillan, J. H. (1987). Enhancing college students' critical thinking: A review of studies. Research in higher education, 26(1), 3-29. Nusche (2007). Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: A comparative review of selected practices. Paris: OECD Publications. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students(vol. 2): A third dacade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Paul, R. W. (1982). Teaching critical thinking in the strong sense: A focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal. Logic Newsletter, 4(2), 2-7. Piirto, J. (1992). Understanding those who creat. Temp, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.

Profetto-McGrath, J. (2003). The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of advanced nursing, 43(6), 569-577. Rodzalan, S. A., & Saat, M. M. (2015). The Perception of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill among Malaysian Undergraduate Students. Procedia: social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 725-732. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.425 Ruggiero, V. R. (1984). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought. New York, N.Y: Harper & Row. Shaizatul, A. R., & Maisarah, M. S. (2015). The Perception of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill among Malaysian Undergraduate Students [Electronic version]. Procedia-Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 725-732. Siegel, H. (1991). The generalizability of critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 23(1), 18-30. Swartz, R. J., & Perkins, D. N. (1990). Teaching Thinking: Issues and Approaches. Revised Edition. The Practitioners' Guide to Teaching Thinking Series. Midwest Publications, Critical Thinking Press and Software, PO Box 448, Pacific Grove, CA 93950-0448; tele. Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1995). Influences affecting the development of students' critical thinking skills. Research in higher education, 36(1), 23-39. The American Philosophical Association (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction(the Delphi Report). ERICDocument No. ED 315-423. Urban, K. K. (1995). Component model of Creativity. A paper presented at the 11th World Conference on the Gifted and Talented, July 29-Aug.4, HongKong. Wilson, K. D. (1989). Predictors of proficiency in critical thinking for college freshmen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. : 2017.8.6. / : 2017.8.11. / : 2017.9.20.

: (,,, ). : A 2~4 A, K-CESA. 231., (multiple group analysis). :., 4. :.