Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.91-116 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.29.1.201903.91 : * Research Subject Trend Analysis on Educational Innovation with Network Text Analysis Purpose: The objective of this study was to analyze the research trends on the educational innovation gathered from Korean academic journals and master s and doctoral degree dissertations published from 2004 to 2018. Method: In order to achieve the objectives, 312 articles and dissertations were collected from RISS utilizing the key word "educational innovation". A total of 1,560 key words were selected from the articles to perform the network text analysis, especially to acquire each node's frequency, co-occurrence and centrality degree. Results: The four most frequently appeared key words were 'educational innovation', 'teacher', 'curriculum', and 'instruction'. The key word which appeared with the most frequency across all government administrations that were installed from 2004 to 2018 was 'educational innovation ; and the most frequent key words by coinciding with each administration are as follows: 1) Rho Moo-Hyun: 'teacher' and 'university' 2) Lee Myoung-Bak: 'university' and 'curriculum', 3) Park Geun-Hye: 'curriculum' and 'teachers', 4) Moon Jae-In: '4th Industrial Revolution' and 'teacher'. Extracted key words were categorized into six groups: group one - 'educational innovation' and 'curriculum', group two - 'university education', group three - 'teachers' and 'learners', group four - '4th industrial revolution', group five 'HRD' and 'regional innovation' and group six - 'educational innovation'. Conclusion: While the number of researches on educational innovation increased gradually from 2004, more research trend analyses should be conducted in order to provide better conceptualizations of 'educational innovation', 'educational reform' and 'innovation schools'. Key words : educational innovation, key word analysis, network text analysis, governmental analysis, research trend analysis * (2 ). Corresponding Author: Shon, Mi. Busan National University of Education, Dept. of Education, 24, Gyodae-ro, Yeonje-gu, Busan, South Korea, e-mail: shonm@bnue.ac.kr
.. PISA. (), ICT. ODA.,?? 4?.,.,.,,..,,..,.,, 3.. OECD(2005) (innovation),,. (reform) (,, 2018; OECD, 2005). (, 2018;
,,, 2016).. 2009. RISS. cross-checking. 1995 5 31 5.31 (, 2005).. < I-1> RISS.. 33, 4, 1, 11 5.. 2004 2018 66 246 312. 1961-1993 16 58 132 19 1 226 / 1994-1998 8 33 44 3 10 98 / 1999-2003 10 57 61 17 1 146 / 2004-2008 25 202 214 79 0 520 / 2009-2013 28 134 92 27 6 287 / 2014-2017 47 276 77 44 9 453 / 2018 18 47 19 0 3 87 136 749 507 170 29 1,591 5.31, 15.. (1994),
(2003), (2003), (2005), (2005) 10, (2006) ( ), (2007),,,,, (2009), (2010), (2013) 18.,. (2018) ICT : 18,, ICT.,., (2012),,, (2016).. (2005) 50,,, (2010),, (2018). 2005,,, (2010),,, (2018). 4,. (2004~2008), (2009~2013), (2014~2017) (2018). 1.., 4?, 4?
, 4?...., (1994). (p. 87).,,,,.,, 25. (2003) 5 5 10 (p.118)... (p. 118),,. 15 2019.. (2005) 1980,,,,
.. (p.2).,,. (2005) 10.,.,. (, 2005: 18) (2003) 1980 10,. (2006) 1945 6 4 ( ).. (, 2006: 42).. 13. (2007),,,, (1993-97) (1998-2002) (2003-2007).. (2010).,
,. (2013) 18 < II-1>. -. - - - - - - - -,,,., (,, 2013; Roberts, 1997).., (,,, 2014)., (semantic network matrix) (,, 2012).,, (2018),,,,, (2015),,, (2016), (2018)., (2018) < > 894
.,, (2016) < >. ICT : 18, (, 2018). (2018) (2014-2018 ).. 2004 2018. RISS 1,. 1 txt. 2 2,. RISS,. < -1>. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2 2 1 8 8 3 5 7 4 0 5 4 4 8 5 66 4 9 15 17 11 10 10 16 10 14 17 25 20 33 35 246 6 11 16 25 19 13 15 23 14 14 22 29 24 41 40 312 % 1.9 3.5 5.1 8 6.1 4.2 4.8 7.4 4.5 4.5 7.1 9.3 7.7 13.1 12.8 100
< -1> (Network Text Analysis: NTA) (Popping, 2000). (2018),, (2016)., RISS 2019 1 14 MS-Excel 2016,,,,,.,, 5 2 1 5. 1), 2) 2 3). 3 ( :,, () ), ( :. ), 1,560 (312 x5 ) KrKwic krtitle.exe Leydesdorff(2004).,, 5. words.txt text.txt 5 1. coocc.dbf., coocc.dbf Excel NodeXL,, Fruchterman-Reingold.. 1) 교육혁신관련연구의주요주제어빈도수분석결과
2004 2018 312 5, 1,560. < -1>,,,,.,,,. 50 40 ~ 50 10 ~ 20 7 ~ 10 (125) (41), (41), (41) (19), (15), (14), (14), 4 (13), (12), (11), ()(10), (10), (10), (10) (9), (9), (9), (9), (8), (8), (8), (8), (7), (7), (7), (7), (7), (7) 2) 연도및논문종류별빈도수분석결과 < -2> 312, (, ). 2007 25, 2011 23 2015 29 4, 2017 2 80. 2, 2. < -1>.. 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 n 2 2 1 8 8 3 5 7 4 0 5 4 4 8 5 66 % 3 3 2 12 12 5 8 11 6 0 8 6 6 12 8 100 n 4 9 15 17 11 10 10 16 10 14 17 25 20 33 35 246 % 2 4 6 7 4 4 4 7 4 6 7 10 8 13 14 100 6 11 16 25 19 13 15 23 14 14 22 29 24 41 40 312 (%) 77(24.6) 79(25.3) 116(37.1) 40(12.8) 312(99.8)
3) 정부별주요주제어빈도수분석결과.,,. 1. 2004~2008, 2009~2013, 2014~2017 2018. < -3>. (2004~2008) (2009~2013) (2014~2017) (2018) 77 79 116 40 312 4.,,,.,,.,,. 40, 4. < -4> 10.
(34), (12), (11), (11), (8), (5), (5), (4), (4), (4), (4), (4), (4), (4), (4) (29), (14), (10), (10), (5), (4), (4), (4), (4), (3), (3), (3), (3), (3), (3), (3) (45), (14), (13), (13), (11), (9), (8), 4 (7), ()(7), (7) (17), 4 (6), (6), (6), (5), (4), (4), (4), ()(3), (3), (3) < -5> < -4> ICT,.,. ICT, 10. ICT 4. (2004~2008) (2009~2013) (2014~2017) (2018) ICT (34), (8), (4), (4), (4), (4) (12), (11), (11), (5), (4), (4) (5), (4) 58 (50.8%) 47 (41.3%) 9 (7.9%) 100% (14), (10), (29), (4), (5), (10), (4), (4), (3), (4), 105 (3), (3), (3) (3) (3), (3), 43 (41%) 50 (47.6%) 12 (11.4%) 100% (45),(9), (8), (7) (14), (13), (13), (11), 4 (7), ()(7), 69 (51.5%) 51 (38%) 14 (10.5) 100% (6), (6), 4 (6), (17), (4) (5), (4), 61 (4), (3), (3) ()(3), 21 (34.4%) 31(50.8%) 9 (14.8%) 100% 191 (46.1%) 179 (43.2%) 44 (10.7%) 414 114 134
50.8%. (4). (5), (4), (4). 41% 10% ICT. (4) (3), ICT, ICT 6., 51.5%. ICT. 38%., ICT 4 (). 4 macro () micro,.,,. ICT. < -2>, < -6>., -1.,,,,, 4,,..
125 0.93 10 0.24 41 0.69 9 0.31 41 0.62 9 0.31 41 0.62 9 0.28 19 0.34 9 0.31 15 0.31 8 0.24 14 0.38 8 0.21 14 0.24 8 0.17 4 13 0.41 8 0.41 12 0.31 7 0.21 11 0.34 7 0.24 11 0.34 7 0.14 () 10 0.24 7 0.21 10 0.34 7 0.38 10 0.34 7 0.41 Wakita-Tsurumi
< -7> 6. 1,,. 2,,,. 3. 4 4,. 5 6. < -3>. G1,,,,, G2,,,, G3 (),,,, G4,,, 4, G5,,,, G6,,,
,.,, ()... 1) 노무현정부주요주제어네트워크텍스트분석결과 11, < -9> (0.57). < -4>.,, < -8> +. 0 13 5 5 0 5 3 1 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 13 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5 2 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 5 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
34 0.79 12 0.5 11 0.57 11 0.43 8 0.36 5 0.29 5 0.36 4 0.36 4 0.29 4 0.14 4 0.29 4 0.21 4 0.36 4 0.21 4 0.29 2) 이명박정부주요주제어네트워크텍스트분석결과 0 9 6 4 1 0 5 2 3 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 9 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 4 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
29 0.87 14 0.47 10 0.53 10 0.33 5 0.2 4 0.07 4 0.4 4 0.27 4 0.4 3 0.13 3 0.27 3 0.13 3 0.2 3 0.2 3 0.33 3 0.27 < -5> < -11> (0.53) (0.47), (0.4), (0.4). 5., +. 3) 박근혜정부주요주제어네트워크텍스트분석결과 4 () 0 6 3 7 7 0 2 3 4 3 6 0 4 4 2 0 0 2 1 0 3 4 0 4 0 0 3 1 1 2 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 3 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 () 4 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 0
45 0.89 14 0.67 13 0.78 13 0.56 11 0.44 9 0.11 8 0.44 4 7 0.56 () 7 0.67 7 0.44,. (0.78), (0,67), () (0.67), (0.56). (),. +, +,. 4) 문재인정부의주요주제어네트워크텍스트분석결과 4 () 0 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 3 4 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 2 () 2 1 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0
17 1 4 6 0.5 6 0.7 6 0.4 5 0.5 4 0.2 4 0.5 4 0.4 () 3 0.6 3 0.7 3 0.5 < -15> (0.7), (0.5). < -4>,. < -14> +.. 2018..,. 2017 2018. 2.
., 2013..,,,. ICT 7.9% 14.9%. ICT (2018) ICT. 2018 ICT ICT,,, e-learning,, u-learning,,,,,, m, m-learning,,,,,, MOOC,,,, (p.246),, RISS. (5 ) (4 ) 4 (7 ) () (7 ). (3 ) 3. ICT. ICT, ICT ICT.,, ICT,,, 4, ().. ICT ICT ICT. ICT, ICT. (, 2018: 259),
. < -6>, (0.93) (0.31), (0.31), (0.34) 4 (0.41), (0.31), (0.24), (0.21), (0.21) ICT. ICT,. (0.69) (0.31).,.,,.. < -3> 6. 6,,, 4,.. ICT (2018). ICT,.,.,.,. 1, 2, 5.. 3 ICT ()..
.,.,. < -5>, 0.57( ) 0.67( ). 41% 34% 0.33( ) 0.4( ).,,,... ( 4, )... (0.2), < -4>.,. 312? <-1> 507 170,.. 4,.
,, (2014). : 1982~2012. (1), 63-92. (2003).. (1), 117-140. (2018).. (3), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.3.201809.1 (2013). 18,. (3), 153-180.,, (2010).. (3), 181-204.,, (2018). : (2002-2017). (1), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.20306/ kces.2018.28.1.1 (2003). 참여정부교육개혁, 추진력에문제있다. (2003. 11. 5). https://news.joins.com/article/2437989,,,, (2015). :. (1), 291-315. (2018). ICT : 18,. (4), 239-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/ pnuedi.28.4.201812.239, (2018).. (2), 281-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.22553/keas.2018.36.2.281, (2018).. (2), 287-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.2.201806.287,, (2016). :. (2006). (). 41-66.,,,, (2009).,. (1), 1-24., (2013). :. (2). 73-108., Leydesdorff, L. (2004). KrKwic. (5), 1377-1388.
,,,,,, (2005). 50 :. (2), 181-198.,, (2016). : 20,. (1), 31-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.15833/kafeiam.22.1.031 (1994).. (1), 85-102.,, (2018).. (2), 211-240. http://dx.doi.org/:10.24211/tjkte.2018.35.2.211 (2003). [ ]. 35-78. (2012).. (4), 349-378.,,, (2016).. (3). 81-105.,, (2016). -. (2), 153-185. (2005).. 1-30. (2005). : 10. (1), 1-16. (2010).. (2), 175-203., (2012).. (2), 53-66. (2007).. 140-177. OECD (2005). Oslo Manual, OECD & Statistical Office of the European Communities. Paris: OECD Publishing. Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis. London: SAGE. Roberts, C. W. (1997). "Introduction" In C. W. Roberts, ed. Text Analysis for the Social Sciences: Methods for Drawing Statistical Inferences from Texts and Transcripts, 1-8. Mahwah, NJ: Saur. : 2019.01.31. / : 2019.02.07. / : 2019.03.20.
: : 2004 2018. : RISS 2004 2018 66 245 312.. 5 4 1,560. : 4,,,,.,,, 4.. 1, 2, 3, 4 4, 5, 6. 4, (),. : 4,.. ICT, ICT (, 4, (), )..