Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

부산교육 311호

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The obje

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

,......

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.1-25 DOI: * An Analysis on Content

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

歯14.양돈규.hwp

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

ePapyrus PDF Document

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **


.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on the Recog

16회말하기

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

(5차 편집).hwp


도비라

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

<313120B9DABFB5B1B82E687770>

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

01.여경총(앞부분)

278 경찰학연구제 12 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 31 호 )

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

¿ï¸²58È£

< FC3D6C1BEBCF6C1A45FB1E2B5B6B1B3B1B3C0B0B3EDC3D E687770>

<C1DF3320BCF6BEF7B0E8C8B9BCAD2E687770>

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: The Exploratory Stu

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

11이정민

학교폭력표지

Æ÷Àå82š


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re

304.fm


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Basic Study on t

歯1.PDF


KD hwp

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

2 佛敎學報 第 48 輯 서도 이 목적을 준수하였다. 즉 석문의범 에는 승가의 일상의례 보다는 각종의 재 의식에 역점을 두었다. 재의식은 승가와 재가가 함께 호흡하는 공동의 場이므로 포 교와 대중화에 무엇보다 중요한 역할을 수행할 수 있다는 믿음을 지니고 있었다. 둘째

<31362DB1E8C7FDBFF82DC0FABFB9BBEA20B5B6B8B3BFB5C8ADC0C720B1B8C0FC20B8B6C4C9C6C32E687770>

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

[ 영어영문학 ] 제 55 권 4 호 (2010) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1) Kyuchul Yoon, Ji-Yeon Oh & Sang-Cheol Ahn. Teaching English prosody through English poems with clon

1)2) 1

00내지1번2번

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

<31342DC0CCBFEBBDC42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * The Meaning of Pl

4ÃÖÁØ¿µ

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.65-89 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.29.1.201903.65 * Suggestions of Ways to Improve Teaching Practicum Based on the Experiences of Pre-Service Teachers Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore ways to improve the teaching practicum based on the experiences of preservice teachers. Method: In 2018, 537 students who completed the required teaching courses for teacher certificate at the national university (P university) participated in the study. The questionnaire survey and open-ended questions the students conducted on the experience of teaching practicum were used as the main data. The content analysis and the network text analysis were applied to find out the difficulties of the preservice teachers in the course of the study, how to improve the teaching practicum, and how to improve the teacher training course respectively. Results: The main results are as follows. First, preservice teachers felt the greatest difficulty in student control and class preparation due to insufficient teaching skills during teaching practicum. Second, the preservice teachers asked the formation of an atmosphere of respect for the students(preservice teachers) at the training school level and the extension of the training period at the Ministry of Education and the Education Office level. Third, preservice teachers actively demanded classroom demonstration, instructional design opportunity expansion, and reinforcement of lecture contents that can be applied to the field. Conclusion: Based on the results, we suggest ways to improve teaching practicum; 1) increase the opportunity of class demonstration in teaching courses, 2) strengthen the development of teaching ability centered on student motivation, and 3) make a more concrete link between teacher training institute and practical training school and school site before and after training. Key words: Preservice teachers, Teaching practicum, Content analysis, Network text analysis. * (2 ). Corresponding Author: Kim, Hyeyoung. Pusan National University, Dept. of Education, Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, Korea, e-mail: 3k1y004@hanmail.net

.,, (, 2015).,,, (,, 2014;, 2004;, 2003;,, 2012;, 2005),, (,, 2007;,,2009;,, 2012). (, 2015). (, 2004;,, 2007;, 2003;,, 2016;, 2005)., (,, 2008).. 1) 2) 3). () 3, (,, 2012;,, 2016)., (,,, 2016). (,, 2012) (,, 2016). (2009). (, 2004),

.,, (, 2008),. 537..,?,?,?.. (,, 2014;, 2004;, 2003;,, 2012;, 2005),, (, 2017;,, 2008;,, 2007;,, 2009;,, 2012), (, 2007;, 2004). (,, 2014;, 2005;, 2017;,, 2014;,, 2016;, 2013). (, 2004;, 2003;, 2005), (, 2003;,, 2016). (, 2005), (,, 2016),

(,, 2016). (2007),,. (2009). (2012).,. (,,, 2016). ( 2005;, 2007;, 2004).. (,, 2009) (,, 2014), (, 2005), (,, 2012), (,, 2016). (, 2012).,,..

(Mixed Method). (P) 537. < -1>, ( ),, < -2>. ( ) 537 100.0 162 30.2 375 69.8 350 65.2 84 15.6 103 19.2 44 8.2 307 57.2 186 34.6 438(81.6) 99(18.4) 537(100.0) 278(79.4) 72(20.6) 350(100.0) 64(76.2) 20(23.8) 84(100.0) 96(93.2) 7(6.8) 103(100.0) 81.6%, 438 93.2%. (, ) P.

. 3.....,,,.,., ( ). ( ).. 1) 기술통계 (,, ) (%). () (,, ), (, ),. 30% 30%, 30% ** 30% *. 2) 질적분석 (content analysis). 3. 3

3. 95%. 3) 네트워크텍스트분석 (Network Text Analysis, NTA) 3.,, (Poping, 2000).,, (2016).,,,., KrKwic. KrKwc Leydesdrff(2004).,,. 1) 2 ( : + ), 2) ( * 1) ),, 3) ( *, ).,.,. 25.,., NetMiner, Kamada-Kawai.,. (size) ( : 1~50), (width) ( : 1~10).. 1) *.

. (46 ) 491. 509 < -1>.,,,,,,,., < -2>.

345 63.8 283 51.1 76 19.5 71 14.1 62 25.7 50 11.1 40 15.8 36 12.7 34 7.7 29 9.4 27 6.0 25 6.0 24 10.0 21 14.3 20 34.1 20 3.7 18 3.3 17 17.7 17 4.8 16 16.0 15 4.5,,,,,,,..,..,,. -, - -, -,,.. < -1>.,,. 30% 30% ** 30% *..

77 20 30 32 95 (23.40) (24.39) (30.61) (21.33) (26.46) 1 2 3 4 (, ),,, 83 (25.23) 40 (12.16) 25 (7.60) 47 (14.29) 9 (2.74) 46 (13.98) 2 (0.61) 329 (64.64) 23 (28.05) 14** (17.07) 4* (4.88) 11 (13.41) 3** (3.66) 7 (8.54) 0 (0.00) 82 (16.11) 18 (18.37) 12 (12.24) 9 (9.18) 11 (11.22) 3 (3.06) 13 (13.27) 2** (2.04) 98 (19.25) 29 (19.33) 23 (15.33) 13 (8.67) 20 (13.33) 2* (1.33) 29** (19.33) 2** (1.33) 150 (29.47) 95 (26.46) 43 (11.98) 25 (6.96) 49 (13.65) 13 (3.62) 37 (10.31) 2 (0.56) 359 (70.53) / 127 251 (49. 124 31) 66 104 (20. 38 43) 69 84 (16. 50) 15 66 (12.97) 4 (0.79) 509 (100.0) ** (,, ), (, ) 30% * (,, ), (, ) 30%,,,,. 4 (< -1>). 251 (49.31%), 104 (20.43%), 84 (16.50%),,, 66 (12.97%).,..

45.. #1:. 45. #2:,...... #3:,,. #4:.,.,.,.,.,..,,

. (274 ) 262. 267 < -3>.,,,,,., < -4>.

197 54.5 116 38.2 114 35.0 110 35.4 84 20.1 60 25.8 49 19.5 48 10.7 45 8.4 37 13.8 35 8.9 23 8.5 22 15.6 22 7.3 21 8.0 21 7.3 19 7.7 17 3.2 4 15 5.5 14 4.3 - - - - -, -, - - -, - - -.,.,..,,. < -2> 3.

17 6 9** 8 24 (9.83) (14.63) (16.98) (9.09) (13.41) 1 2 3 (,, ) ( ) (,, ) 21 (12.14) 15 (8.67) 10 (5.78) 11 (6.36) 6 (3.47) 41 (23.70) 10 (5.78) 11 (6.36) 9 (5.20) 10 (5.78) 7 (4.05) 4 (2.31) 1* (0.58) 173 (64.79) 0* (0.00) 4 (9.76) 2 (4.88) 2 (4.88) 1 (2.44) 4* (9.76) 8** (19.51) 2 (4.88) 2 (4.88) 0 (0.00) 3 (7.32) 3 (7.32) 4** (9.76) 41 (15.36) 5 (9.43) 2 (3.77) 5 (9.43) 2 (3.77) 1 (1.89) 5* (9.43) 6 (11.32) 3 (5.66) 2 (3.77) 6 (11.32) 3 (5.66) 3 (5.66) 1 (1.89) 53 (19.85) 4* (4.55) 9 (10.23) 7 (7.95) 8** (9.09) 4 (4.55) 23** (26.14) 6 (6.82) 4 (4.55) 3 (3.41) 3 (3.41) 5 (5.68) 3 (3.41) 1 (5.68) 88 (32.96) 22 (12.29) 12** (6.70) 10 (5.59) 7 (3.91) 4 (2.23) 27 (15.08) 18 (10.06) 12 (6.70) 10 (5.59) 13 (7.26) 8 (4.47) 7 (3.91) 5 (2.79) 179 (67.04) / 32 26 21 17 15 8 50 24 16 13 16 13 10 6 119 (44.57) 103 (38.58) 45 (16.85) 267 (100.0) ** (,, ), (, ) 30% * (,, ), (, ) 30%. 119 44.57%,

103 (38.58%), 45 (16.85%).,,,,.,.... #5:,. #6:...,., 4.,. #7: ( ). #8:....

#9:.. #10:,.,.,..,,.,.,,,. () (33 ) (37 ) 467. 586 < -5>.,,,,,,.

, < -6>. 547 126.3 166 39.0 127 41.0 97 23.4 95 28.6 91 24.6 90 32.6 81 44.2 72 22.8 65 18.4 64 14.1 62 17.8 59 17.5 53 26.7 53 21.0 52 15.1 49 21.2 45 14.3 43 12.4 40 15.4 34 12.1 31 10.4 29 9.6 27 9.1 27 11.1

,,,,,,. -, -, - -, -, -, - -.,,..,,,,. < -3> 3. 99 31 28 38 120 / (26.83) (31.31) (23.73) (22.62) (28.71) 1 2 3 ()/ /// (/ /) / ( ) / ( ) 47 (12.74) 109 (29.54) 21 (5.69) 13 (3.52) 49 (13.28) 14* (3.79) 17 (4.61) 369 (62.97) 14 (14.14) 21 (21.21) 4 (4.04) 4 (4.04) 17** (17.17) 4 (4.04) 4 (4.04) 99 (16.89) 29** (24.58) 27 (22.88) 5 (4.24) 4 (3.39) 5* (4.24) 15** (12.71) 5 (4.24) 118 (20.14) 18* (10.71) 50 (29.76) 9 (5.36) 9** (5.36) 26 (15.48) 8 (4.76) 10 (5.95) 168 (28.67) 72 (17.22) 107 (25.60) 21 (5.02) 12 (2.87) 45 (10.77) 25 (5.98) 16 (3.83) 418 (71.33) / 158 90 157 30 21 71 33 26 248 (42.32) 208 (35.49) 130 (22.18) 586 (100.0)

** (,, ), (, ) 30% * (,, ), (, ) 30%, 268 42.32%. 208 (35.49%), 130 (22.18%).,..,. #11:. #12:,.,. #13:.,..,,. #14: ()....,,,.

,. /,.,.,..... ; 1)?, 2)?, 3)?., (50%), (20%), (13%).,.. 50%,,. 20%.,, (, 2005).

(, 2005;,, 2012). () (, 2005). (13%)., ((45%), / (40%), (17%)) 3. 45%. (,, 2016) (,, 2012) 45%.,,. 40%,..,,.,. ( 17%). (,, 2016).,,,.,,,..., 35%.

22%..,. -(,, 2007;,, 2009; Sato, 2014), (,, 2008;,, 2012; Darling-Hammond, 2012).. (,, 2017;,, 2007).. (, 2005;, 2005;,, 2012),, (, 2013). (, 2013). (,, 2009;, 2013). (,,, 2016;, 2013). (, 2013). (,, 2007).,..,, (2016) 4..

(2015).., (2014).. (3), 321-348. (2005).?. (4), 49-76., (2008).. (1), 79-97., (2017). KTOP (Korean Teaching Observation Protocol). (6), 961-970., (2014). A. (1), 51-78. (2004).. (4), 215-232. (2005).. (4), 103-124. (2007).. (3), 185-212. (2012).. (3), 71-100., Loet Leydesdorff (2004). KrKwic. 6(5), 1377-1388., (2007).. (4), 1-29,,,, (2007).. (1), 47-69.,, (2016). : 20,. (1), 31-53.,, (2016).. (1), 1-25. (2004).. (4), 251-271., (2009).. (3),

491-508. (2003).. (1), 69-91., (2012).. (3), 77 94., (2004).. 323-345. (2007).. 1-12., (2016)., -. (3), 159-184.,, (2018). (3), 297-324., (2012).. (4), 63-83. (2004).,. (2), 209-230. (2008).. (4),25-58. (2013). -. (4), 229-262. (2005).. (4), 113-123. Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). The right start: Creating a strong foundation for the teaching career. Kappanmagazine.org, 94(3), 8-13. Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis. London: Sage. Sato, M. (2014). What is the underlying conception of teaching of the edtpa? Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 421 434. : 2019.01.31. / : 2019.02.07. / : 2019.03.20.

:. : 2018 (P) 537. (content analysis) (Network Text Analysis),,. :.,.,,.,. :,,.