상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;


歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )


27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

인문사회과학기술융합학회

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

상담학연구 * -,, ,,....,.,.,... * 2011 ( ) (NRF B00234). (Corresponding Author): / / Tel: /

: * (Theory of Planned Behavior; Ajzen, 1991),.,,,., ,..,,.. * 2012 ( ) (NRF-2012-S1A3A ). :,, Tel : ,

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **


.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

202 김 수 현 원 영 신 있으므로, 이러한 선수들의 긍정적인 태도를 높여 구 단의 성과를 향상시킬 수 있는 조직적 차원의 연구가 요구된다 하겠다. 따라서 선수들을 대상으로 한 프로 구단의 조직성과 제고에 관한 학문적 작업은 중요한 연구과제인 것이다. 최근 조직 커뮤

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

상담학연구 , , ,, ( ),.,., 15 19,, 30, (Corresponding Author): / Tel: /


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

Rheu-suppl hwp

,......

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).


,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

(5차 편집).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:

서론 34 2


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯유성경97.PDF

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

380 Hyun Seok Choi Yunji Kwon Jeongcheol Ha 기존 선행연구에서는 이론연구 (Ki, 2010; Lee, 2012), 단순통계분석 (Lee, 2008), 회귀분석 (Kim, 2012)과 요인분석 (Chung, 2012), 경로분석 (Ku,

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

<C1A63238B1C731C8A328C6EDC1FDC1DF292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A Longitudinal St



Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

<B0E6C8F1B4EBBBE7C8B8B0FAC7D05F3339B1C732C8A32E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

한국 출산력의 저하 요인에 관한 연구

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: * A Study on the Re

< FC3D6C1BEBAB8B0EDBCAD E687770>

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>



DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationship among

ʻ ʼ

03신경숙내지작업

ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

03-배화옥

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

歯1.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

레이아웃 1

상담학연구 : Vocational Identity Status Assessment(VISA-K) 412 Porfeli et al., (2011) (Vocational Identity Status Assesment: VISA),, (2014) VISA-K,,,,, 6.

2004 (Study Korea Project) ,526 85,923 (, 2013).,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (,, 2010;,,,, 2010;,, 2009;,, 2011; Mori, 2000; Raffaelli, Torres Stone

상담학연구. 9., , 21..,,,,,,... (Corresponding Author): / / 154 Tel: /

44-6대지.08김정희-5

Transcription:

* Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * 2012. (Corresponding Author): / / (702-701) 1370 Tel: 053-950-5813 / E-mail: flow@knu.ac.kr

(self-efficacy) (forethought) (Bandura, 1977).,,, (Löve, Moore & Hensing, 2012),,,, (Leung & Leung, 2011). (Shelton, 1990). Bandura(1997),. Bandura (Shelton, 1990). (, 2004). Sherer et al.(1982) (Chen, Gully & Eden, 2001; Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995; Shelton, 1990; Tipton & Worthington Jr., 1984).,, (, 2010).. (Chen, Gully, Whiteman, & Kilcullen, 2000). (generalized or general self-efficacy). (Scherbaum, Cohen-Charash & Kern, 2006) (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995). (specific self-efficacy). Eden(2001)..,.,.

, (, 2002). (proximal motivational state), (distal motivational trait).. Shelton(1990) (spill-over).,,. Shelton. (Chen et al., 2001, 2004; Ferrari & Parker, 1992; Mueller, 1992) Shelton(1990) Eden(2001)., Chen et al.(2001, 2004) 10,. (, 2010;, 2002;, 1997),.. (, 1997; Dahlbeck & Lightsey, Jr., 2008; Kumar & Lal, 2006).,. (Sharf, 2010).. Hackett Betz (1981), Taylor Betz(1983).,,, (Hackett & Betz, 1995),

(,, 2007)., (,, 2011;,, 2010;,, 2007;,, 2011; Lent, Brown & Hackett, 1994)., (,, 2007). (Eden, 2001; Shelton, 1990),,,..., (, 2010)., (, 1997). (,,, 2006). 5 (, 2004),.., (, 2010)..,,,.. (, 2012), (, 2012;,, 2011;, 2010). (, 2006)

,... Bandura. (, 2001;, 2006;, 1995)...,, Shelton (1990) Eden(2001).., Shelton(1990) Eden(2001) 일반적자기효능감 진로자기효능감 일반적자기효능감 진로자기효능감 진로준비행동 진로준비행동. ( 1, 2 ). D (2012 7 8 ) 1. D 4 ( 2 ) 221 1 259 ( ) 480.

425. 211 (49.6%), 214 (50.4%). (1997) (1997). 24, (7 ),,, (12 ), (5 ) 3. (1 ) (6 ) Likert 6,. (1997) Cronbach.87,.79,.86,.83. Cronbach.90,.86,.92,.79., (2006) (Career Self-Efficacy Scale).,. 32 Likert 5, (10 ), (11 ), (11 ) 3... 3, 1 11 (11, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28 29, 32), 2 16 (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 30, 31), 3 5 (4, 6, 12, 21, 25). (1 ) (6 ) Likert 6., (2006) Cronbach.96, Cronbach.96, 1, 2, 3.94,.95,.75. (2003). 22 4 Likert, (10 ), (5 ), (5 ),

(2 ).,. 2 Cronbach.47 1. 1 8 (9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22), 2 8 (3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 19), 3 4 (1, 2, 4, 20) 3. Likert 6,. Cronbach.89,.86,.77,.79. Cronbach.91, 1, 2, 3 Cronbach.88,.83,.70. PASW 18.0 AMOS 18.0 (Structural Equation Modeling). CFI TLI,, GFI, AGFI, SRMR, RMSEA. RMSEA SRMR.90. SRMR.05, RMSEA.05,.08,.10,.10 (Browne & Cudeck, 1993; Hu & Bentler, 1999).., Sobel.,.,,, 1. t.05. Pearson.,,., (, ), (, ), (, ). 2.

7 7 42 28.85 7.15 -.30-1.06 12 12 72 44.94 10.25 -.03.18 5 5 30 17.48 4.87.07.12 24 44 143 91.27 16.57.04.46 1 11 14 66 48.48 9.92 -.32.15 2 16 15 90 57.63 14.62 -.04.04 3 5 5 30 20.11 4.52 -.03.23 32 49 192 130.32 25.86.04.47 1 8 8 48 21.10 9.01.57 -.09 2 8 8 44 18.81 8.05.74.03 3 4 4 24 15.18 4.12 -.07 -.11 20 20 112 54.90 18.21.57.15 -.712 ** -.513 **.595 ** - Anderson Gerbing(1988),.,,, ( = 95.835, GFI =.955, AGFI =.907, TLI =.934, CFI =.959, SRMR =.041, RMSEA =.089(.071.108))..90.34,.93.40,.89.50,. 9 3..

Chi-Square test / GFI AGFI SRMR TLI CFI (A) 96.990 23 4.217.955.911.041.936.959 (B) 95.835 22 4.356.955.907.041.934.959 RMSEA (90% CI).087 (.070.105).089 (.071.108) (A:B)

,.., ( 3, 3, 4)., 1.05 3.84 ( ), ( ) ( ).... 4., (.876, ), (.902, )..791(=.876.902). Sobel ( ).,. Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).,.876 *** -.876 ***.902 *** -.902 ***

....,,,,. (2010), (2012) (2012). (2006). (r=.712), (2001) (r=.76). (2010), (r=.59) (r=.81),.,.,. Chen et al.(2001, 2004), (2010).,. Shelton(1990), Eden(2001)..., (Rucker, Preacher, Tormala & Petty, 2011) (.791).,

,..,,,..,..., D 1.,...,,.,, Shelton(1990) Eden(2001),,.., (1997), (1997),,. (Chen, Gully & Eden, 2001; Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995), (Scherbaum, Cohen-Charash & Kern, 2006).

,..,. (Eden, 2001).,.,. (Eden, 2001).,., (, 2002).,,., (2007).. (3), 171-189. (1997).,.,, (2006). ( 2 ). :. (1997).. (2), 1-19. (2004).. (1), 1-39., (2001).

. (1), 95-123. (2001).,. (2012).,., (2011).. (7), 1-32., (2006).. (2), 385-397. (2003).. (2), 121-143. (2006).,., (2011). :. (2), 91-109. (2010).,., (2010)., :. (3), 1325-1350. (2002). :,. (3), 49-72. (2012).,.,,,, (2004).., (2007).,,,. (3), 1085-1099., (2011).. (1), 157-174. (2010).,. (1997).,.,,, (2010).. (4), 75-94. (1995).,. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long(Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001).

Validation of a new General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 375-395. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 835-847. Dahlbeck, D. T., & Lightsey Jr., O. R. (2008). Generalized self-efficacy, coping, and self-esteem as predictors of psychological adjustment among children with disabilities or chronic illnesses. Children's Health Care, 37, 293-315. Eden, D. (2001). Means efficacy: External sources of general and specific subjective efficacy. In M. Erez, U. Kleinbeck, & H. Thierry(Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy(pp. 73-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum. Ferrari, J. R., & Parker, J. T. (1992). High school achievement, self-efficacy and locus of causality as predictors of freshman academic performance. Psychological Reports, 71, 515-518. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1995). Self-efficacy and career choice and development. In J. E. Maddux(Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application(pp.249-280). New York: Plenum Press. Hu, L. Z., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Kumar, R., & Lal, R. (2006). The role of self-efficacy and gender difference among the adolescents. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 32, 345-350. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social congnitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122. Leung, E. Y. P., & Leung, A. Y. M. (2011). Factor structure and gender invariance of the Chinese General Self-Efficacy Scale among soon-to-be-aged adults. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(6), 1383-1392. Löve, J., Moore, C. D., & Hensing, G. (2012). Quality of Life Research, 21, 1249-1253. Mueller, L. M. (1992). The effect of general and task-specific self-efficacy on the performance of a fine motor task. Journal of Sports Behavior, 15, 130-140. Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359-371. Scherbaum, C. A., Cohen-Charash, Y., & Kern, M. M. (2006). Measuring general self-efficacy: A comparison of three measures using item response theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 1047-1063. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Self-efficacy measurement and generalized self-efficacy scale. In

J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston(Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A users' portfolio(pp. 33-39). Windsor: Neer-Nelson. Sharf, R. S. (2010). Applying career development theory to counseling(5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadworth. Shelton, S. H. (1990). Developing the construct of general self-efficacy. Psychological Reports, 66, 987-994. Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671. Taylor, K. M., & Betz, N. E. (1983). Application of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 63-81. Tipton, R. M., & Worthington, Jr. E. L. (1984). The measurement of generalized self-efficacy: A study of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(5), 545-548. : 2013. 2. 15. : 2013. 3. 31. : 2013. 4. 10.

The Structural Relation of General Self-Efficacy, Career Self-Efficacy and Career Preparation Behavior Among Middle School Students Kyungpook National University The purpose of this study was to investigate the relation of general self-efficacy, specific self-efficacy and career preparation behavior among middle school students. Based on Shelton(1990) and Eden(2001)'s general self-efficacy and relevant empirical findings, two models of the complete and partial mediation of career self-efficacy were established and compared. 480 students in D city completed General Self-Efficacy Scale, Career Self-Efficacy Scale and Career Preparation Behavior Scale and 425 questionnaires were used. For data analysis, correlation analysis and structural equation modeling were employed. In comparing the two models, the complete mediation model was determined to be more superior. In the partial mediation model, the direct effect of general self-efficacy on career preparation behavior was not statistically significant, suggesting the complete mediating effect of career self-efficacy. Based on the findings, implications for educational and counseling interventions, as well as limitations of the current study and the suggestions for further research, were discussed. Key words : general self-efficacy, career self-efficacy, career preparation behavior