경북대학교법학연구원 법학논고 제 66 집 (2019.7) 59 90 면. Kyungpook Natl. Univ. Law Journal Vol.66 (Jul 2019) pp.59 90. 1) 말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 * - 학문후속세대양성과법학교육의미래 - 2) ** < 국문초록 > 2009. 10,.,..... 1.., 2.. 35. 2, 3.,.,,, * 2019 1 23 :. **,.
60 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7)... SJD Ph.D.. 求心的, 求人的.. 주제어 : 법학전문대학원, 법학교육의위기, 변호사시험의개선, 학문후속세대와법조인의양성, 학문법학의회생 투고일 : 2019.06.30. / 심사일 : 2019.07.15. / 게재확정일 : 2019.07.17. I. 2009.,. 10,.. 1),. 2) 1),, 13, ( ), 2018.12.31., 1.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 61. 3) ( 衆志 ),, (renaissance).., 10. 4) 2) 1 85.45%. 2000 1,698 33 1,665 1,451., 8 1,691 50.78% 49.35%. 3),,, 58,, 2017.05., 4 6 ( ) ( ) 3,, (2019 1 23 ), 57. 4) (Wissenschaft). 1790, (Paul Koschaker) (Koschaker, Paul, Europa und das römische Recht, 4. Aufl., 1966, S. 210, 265, 337 ff.).,. " (Begriffspyramide) " (Genealogie der Begriffe) (G. F. Puchta, Cursus der Institutionen, Bd. 1, 9. Aufl., 1881, S. 36.). " Begriffsrealismus,.
62 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7),.. Ⅱ. ( ) :. (Rechtswissenschaft) (Brotwissenschaft).,?., 學 (Wissenschaft;, ) 術 (art;, )? 1., (Brotwissenschaft)? (Rechtswissenschaft), (Brotwissenschaft)?,? ( ),. 5) ( 反響 ). ( 適答 ) / ( ). K. Larenz, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 4. Aufl., 1979, S. 21; F. Wieacker, Privarrechsgeschichte der Neuzeit, 2. Aufl., 1967, S, 399 ff.(, :,, 2018. 9. 3., 3-5 ). 5),, -,, 7 1,, 2015.06., 1.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 63. /. - 1676 (Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz) (Hanover) (Stellung als Kanzleirath).,., (Mainz). 6) (1883 1924)., (Rechtswissenschaft) (Brotwissenschaft). 7) ( 文學史 ). 8) - (Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller, 1759 1805) (Karlsschule) 2,,., 1789 6) Luig, Klaus, Auszug aus dem Inhalt von Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1646-1716), HRG(Handwörterbuch zur duetschen Rechtsgeschichte), Band III: Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhem (1646-1716) = https://www.hrgdigital.de/.download/pdf/leibniz_gottfried_ wilhelm_1646_1716.pdf( 2019. 1. 19.) Gegen Ende des Jahres 1676 ging L. nach Hannover, wo er zunächst als Bibliothekar arbeitete und später eine Stellung als Kanzleirath annahm. Von da an war, wie er selbst es ausdrückte, die Rechtswissenschaft seine Brotwissenschaft. Neben seinen Verpflichtungen als Richter in Hannover, gab er Anregungen zur Verbesserung der Arbeit der Gerichte und arbeitete intensiv an den in Mainz entwickelten Plänen zur Reform des Röm. Rechts. 7),? (http://www.ohmynews.com/nws_web/ View/ss_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002211240&isPc=true; 2019. 1. 19.) 8) Radbruch, Gustav, Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft, 7./8. Aufl., 1929; Kaufmann, Arthur(Bearbeitet), Gesamtausgabe. Band I: Rechtsphilosophie I, C.F. Müller, 1987, S. 397.
64 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7). - (Wilhelm Heinrich Wackenroder 1773 1798) (Johann Ludwig Tieck, 1773 1853) :,.,.. 2.??., 學問 (Wissenschaft, science, scientia). 9) 10).,., (Immanuel Kant) 11). 體系 (System)., ( 究明 ) (rerum cognoscere causas),.. 9),,,. :,, 2007.05., 153. 10) Weingartner, Paul, Wissenschaftstheorie, Bd. 1, 1971, S. 11. 11) Vorrede zu "Metaphysische Anfangsgruende der Naturwissenschaft", 1787.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 65 1848, (Julius Hermann von Kirchmann), - - (Wissenschaft) (Jurisprudenz) (Wertlosigkeit). 12) ( ). 13).. 理性 最適性 (ein Optimum an Rationalität),.. 3. : 2 (Publius Juventius Celsus, 67 130 ). 14) - Digesta 1.1.1pr. Ius est ars boni et aequi. ( ) ars (technique) (art, Kunst). (Wissenschaft). 12) Staats-Anwalt v. Kirchmann, Die Wertlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft, 3. Aufl., Julius Springer, Berlin; 1848. 13) drei berichtigende Worte des Gesetzgebers und ganze Bibliotheken werden zu Makulatur." Tschentscher, Axel, Einführung in die Grundprinzipien des Rechts, Universität Bern, Vorbereitungstext zur Dritten Vorlesung : Julius Hermann von Kirchmann, Die Werthlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft (1848), zitiert nach dem Faksimile-Neudruck hrsg. von Hermann Klenner, Freiburg/Berlin 1990, S. 23, 25, 39f., 43f. (http://www.servat.unibe.ch/rphil/t/kirchmann_wertlosigkeit.pdf). ( 2019. 1. 19.) 14),, 151.
66 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7) (ars). 倫理學. 15) 法學 神學, 敎義學 (Dogmatik). Dogma.,. 16) 分析學, 17),,. ( 區分 ). Ⅲ. 1. 對 (Rechtswissenschaft) (Wissenschaft),,. 18) 19, 15),, 151. 16),, 151. 17) Schulz, Fritz, Principles of Roman Law, 1936, p.19 39(,, 151 ). 18) (University) universitas ( ; Union), studium generale, (https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/ # ). 7. 7 3 (trivium) 4 (quadrivium), 3 ( ) 4,,,.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 67.. -,,, 2013, 1 ; Jurisprudenz Rechtswissenschaft, Jurisprudence legal theory, philosophy of law (, Ian McLeod, Legal Theory, 2. ed., Palgrave, 2003, p. 2), (Anglo-American) Jurisprudence legal theory,,. prudentia scientia, Jurisprudenz. 19) Jurisprudenz (,, )., (Rechtswissenschaft). (Jurisprudenz) ( 讀解 ),. ( 獨解 ). 2. 斷想 (Markus D. Dubber) ( ) ( ), (Strafrecht als Botanik, in: Empirische und dogmatische Fundamente, kriminalpolitischer Impetus. Symposium für Bernd Schünemann zum 60. Geburtstag. Herausgegeben von Roland Hefendehl, Köln, Berlin, München 2005, 245 256 ) (Die Anspruchlosigkeit des awissenschaftlichen Strafrechts, ZStW 121 (2009), 977 984 ) 19),, 2 3).
68 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7) ( 國譯 ). 20). 21), / /?. - 1800 (Paul Johann Anselm Feuerbach) 1871 100,. 22) - 쇅 / (Jescheck/Weigend) 19 食人 (Mignonette) [Regina v. Dudley & Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273 (CCR)].,, 쇅 /. 23) - ( 是非 ). 20) /,,, 55,, 2012.05., 401, 21) /,, 405. 22) Gimbernat Ordeig, in: Hirsch (Hrsg.) Krise des Strafrechts und der Strafrechtswissenschaften?, 2001, S. 152, 165( /,, 404 ). 23) Jescheck/Weigend, Strafrecht AT, 5. Aufl., 1996, S. 195( /,, 405 ).
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 69,.. 24).,,.,. 25) -,,. ( ),.. ( ),,. 26) - 19..,,.. - -. 27) - 24) /,, 405. 25) /,, 405 406. 26) /,, 406. 27) /,, 408.
70 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7),., - - 20.,. 28) -,,. 19.,. -,,. 29).,,, / (LEET) ( )., ( ). ( 毒舌 )., /.?? 28) /,, 408. 29) /,, 408.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 71. 3.?,.. - -.,,.,.. 30),,. 31) 3,.. - 眞相,.., 30).. 31),, 3,, 2003.03.10., 166.
72 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7).,. 32) -,.,..,.. 33).? /. ( 像 ) 5,.,?. 32), 1 -, 61, 2004.06, (https://webzine.skku.edu/skkuzine/section/knowledge02.do?mode=list&&pagerli mit=10&articleno=29575&pager.offset=20).( 2019. 2. 19.) 33),, 43, 2003.09 (https://webzine.skku.edu /skkuzine/section/knowledge02.do?articleno=29233&pager.offset=110&pagerlimit=10).( 2019. 2. 19.)
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 73 4.,,?,. AI,. ( 示唆 ) (AI) (Watson),. 2018 2 (?). AI. 34) (deep learning).,,. 35). 2010,. 36),. 34) 2018. 2. 28 : AI, (https://www.mk.co.kr/news/society/view/2018/02/137456/) ( : 2019. 2. 19)., AI 20 30. 35) (Blaise Pascal).. Pensées,. 36) 2010. 10. 28. 2008 429 ( ).
74 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7),,. 37) ( ),.. 38),., ( ).,,. 39) Ⅳ. 1. 37),,, 14 1,, 2013.02., 141. 38),, : 8 ( ),, 2018, 558. 39),, 559.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 75, 10 40). / 3. ( 貧益貧 ) - - ( 枯死 ). ( 富益富 ) 1, 1 41)., 2. 35. 42) 23 ( ) 2 2. 43) 40) ( : ) 2,,. 41) 8 ( ) 1. 42) (2001. 3. 31. 17181 ) 3 ( ) 2 5 2 35. 2006, ( 5 1, 2, 3 ).. 43) 23 ( ) 2, ( ),..
76 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7). 3 2 26 ( ) 2 3. 44) 35. 45), 3.,. 3., ( ) 100 ( 60 40 ).,.. 44) 26 ( ) 2 3 1. 3 3 1. 45),,,, 2007. 4. 26. 2003 947.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 77,..,.,,,. ( ). ( ). ( ) ( 顯在 ) ( 潛在 ). ( ) ( ). 2. 10. - ( )... 46) 46),, 13, ( ), 2018.12.31., 7.
78 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7) (, )..,. 47) 10 /. SKY ( ),...,,. 48) - 2008 429,. 49) 47),, -,, 53 6 (= 2008/6),, 2008.05., 105. 48) :,, 43. 2018 4 : 10. 49), (?),,, 60,, 2017.11., 27.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 79. 1 SJD Ph.D. 2. 1 求心的, 2 求人的.. ( 古事 ).. 50) -,, 3 (Notar) (Einheitsjurist)., 5 1 (Befaehigung zum Richteramt). (Bungersrechtsanwaltsordning, BRAO) 4 1 (Rechtsanwalt) (Befaehigung zum Richteramt). 51),,. 52) 50),,, 28 1,, 2015.06., 128 ;,,, 58,, 2017.05., 63. 51) Haase, Marco, Die Juristenausbildung in Deutschland, in: JuS 2013, 1 f.(,, 129 ). 52),, 130.
80 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7). 구분내용기간 법과대학 법학수업 최소 4 년 * 연방평균약 5.5 년 고시 제1차국가고시 * 응시기회 2번 사법연수 시보과정 (Referendariat) 2년 고시 제2차국가고시 * 응시기회 2번 * 홍선기, 앞의논문, 128면 - (numerus clausus) (Zentralstelle fuer die Vergabevon Studienplatz, ZVS),.. 53) -, 1 2. ( 州 ) (Freiversuch Freischuss) 8 1.. 54) -, - (Baden- Wuerttemberg) (JAPrO BW) 4, 4 (Zwischenpruefung).,,, 1 53),, 131. 54),, 132.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 81.,. 1. 4. 55) - 5a 3 2, 3 (Praktishe Studienzeit).. 1. 56) - 1. 1 4. 1 5 1 2 (Schwerpunktbereich) (Pflichtfach). 1 30%, 70%, 1. 57) 1 (Vorbereitungsdienst), (Rechtsteferendar, Ref. jur.). (Diplom-Jurist, Dipl.-Jur.). 58) - 5b 1 (Vorbereitungsdienst) 2, 1. 55),, 135 136. 56),, 136. 57) 2,,. 58),, 137 138.
82 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7). 20 (Vorbereitungsdienst). 59) - 2 (Justizpruefungsamt). 2 1, (Vorbereitungsdienst)., (Vorbereitungsdienst). 70:30. 2 1 ( 5d ). 2 2, ( 州 ) ( 州 ) 1. 60) - 1 2 (Doktoranden). 0 18 4. 4 6. 16 13 15. 7. (Dissertation), magna cum laude (Habilitanden), 59),, 139-140. 60),, 140 141.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 83 (Habilitationsschrift). 10%. (wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiter). (ordentlicher Professor) ( 7 ), ( 138 ). 61) Ⅴ. 1) 10,..,,.,.. 1.., 2.. 35. 2 61),, 141 142.
84 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7), 3.,.,,,... SJD Ph.D,. 求心的, 求人的.. 2),..,. - ( ). -.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 85. ( ).. 62), 4 ( )..!. 62),, 13, ( ), 2018.12.31., 6.
86 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7) [ ],, 43, 2003.09. (https://webzine.skk u.edu/skkuzine/section/knowledge02.do?articleno=29233&pager.offset=110 &pagerlimit=10).( 2019. 2. 19.), 1 -, 61, 2004.06. (https://webzine.skku.edu/skkuzine/section/knowledge02. do?mode=list&&pagerlimit=10&articleno=29575&pager.offset=20).( 2019. 2. 19.),, (2019 1 23 ), 37.,, -,, 7 1,, 2015.06., 1., :, (2018. 9. 3.).,,, 13, ( ), 2018.12.31., 6., -,, 53 6 (= 2008/ 6),, 2008.05., 105,,, : 8 ( ),, 2018. /,,, 55,, 2012.05., 401. 2018. 2. 28 : AI, (https://www.mk.co.kr/news/society/view/2018/02/137456/) ( : 2019. 2. 19). 2018. 5. 8 : 1-70% (www.lec.co.kr/news/articleprint.html?idxno= 47537). ( 2019. 2. 19.). 2018. 5. 9 : 2-
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 87? (www.lec.co.kr/news/articleprint.html?idx no=47547).( 2019. 2. 19.). 2018. 5. 24 : 3-? (www.lec.co.kr/news/articleprint.html?idxno =47674).( 2019. 2. 19.). 2018. 6. 5 : 4-. (www.lec.co.kr/news/articleprint.html? idxno=47788).( 2019. 2. 19.).,,, 58,, 2017.05., 1.,,, 60,, 2017.11., 27.,,, 14 1,, 2013.02., 141.,,,. :,, 2007.05., 147.,, ( 735 ),, 2019.04. 22., 10.,,, 13, ( ), 2018.12.31., 4.,? (http://www.ohmynews.com/nws_ Web/View/ss_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002211240&isPc=true; 2019. 1. 19.),,, 13, ( ), 2018.12.31., 5.,,, 58,, 2017.05., 63.,,, 28 1,, 2015.06., 115,,, 3,, 2003.03.10.
88 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7) Tschentscher, Axel, Einführung in die Grundprinzipien des Rechts, Universität Bern, Vorbereitungstext zur Dritten Vorlesung : Julius Hermann von K irchmann, Die Werthlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft (1848), zitiert nach dem Faksimile-Neudruck hrsg. von Hermann Klenner, Freiburg/Berlin 1990, S. 23, 25, 39f., 43f.: (http://www.servat.unibe.ch/ rphil/t/kirchmann_wertlosigkeit.pdf).( 2019. 1. 19.) Radbruch, Gustav, Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft, 7./8. Aufl., 1929. Kaufmann, Arthur(Bearbeitet), Gesamtausgabe. Band I: Rechtsphilosophie I, C.F. Müller, 1987. Luig, Klaus, Auszug aus dem Inhalt von Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1646-1716), HRG(Handwörterbuch zur duetschen Rechtsgeschichte), Band III: Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhem (1646-1716) = https://www. hrgdigital.de/.download/pdf/leibniz_gottfried_wilhelm_1646_1716.pdf( 2019. 1. 19.) Weingartner, Paul, Wissenschaftstheorie, Bd. 1, 1971. Staats-Anwalt v. Kirchmann, Die Wertlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft, 3. Aufl., Julius Springer, Berlin; 1848.
말기법학의연명장치마련을위한제언 / 이경렬 89 [Abstract] Revitalization proposal for law education in crisis 63)Lee, Kyung-Lyul * The Law School was introduced and implemented in 2009 to improve the problems of the former judicial examination system, which referred to as 'Shilin - dong Examination Law'. However, ten years after the introduction of law school, lawyers are still being selected with the examination passing rate that is dropping every year. In addition, despite its name, law school is centered on the lawyer examination. Thus, the training of succeeding generation of the scholarship in graduate school of law and the education of the law theory are pushed back. Under these circumstances, the academic field of law will perish. The rumors of legal education due to the lack of legal scholars will lead to a lack of legal knowledge and common sense across the government and society. This will come down as regression of the rule of law. Therefore, the following suggestions are made in order to solve overall problems. 1First of all, I suggest 'revival of undergraduate law' as a countermeasure. However, it seems that the actual legal system and the legal education system will not easily accept it. 2Given the legal system and the reality of the situation, the second suggestion is that the law school admissions strengthen the number of undergraduate law course credits as an assessment factor. It is not a violation of the law as long as admissions do not require the entry of grades acquired at the time of judging the knowledge of the law, which requires the students to submit the credits and subject names of the legal subjects taken during their undergraduate years. Therefore, similar to the '35 credits of the Law of Thought of the Department of Law' at the time of the former judicial examination, the completion of the basic legal subjects in the undergraduate school can be regarded as one of the entrance examination data. * Professor, Law School of SungKyungKwan University, Ph. D. in Law
90 법학논고제 66 집 (2019. 7) If the proposal 2 is considered as expedient or evasion of law, it can be dismissed. 3If so, reformation of lawyer examination can be considered. If the attorney test format is closely related to the extent to which the content of the law school is influenced by the law, this correlation should be used to change its content through the change of its form. In other words, whether it is a lawyer examination or a mock exam, the qualification test urges the change of the case-type problem so that the ability to find and apply the case law in the facts of the presented case can be evaluated. In addition, I suggest degrees such as Ph.D or SJD in law should be additionaly required in addition to the practical experience in high-ranking practical law such as the Constitutional Court judge and the Supreme Court Justice. This highly self-considered prescription will attract leading eminent legal students who have graduated from the field in academic jurisprudence. One concrete measure is the necessity of SJD process or the recognition of Ph.D. in appointment of judges in connection with unification of the law. The other is the introduction of legal professors training system. If the former plan is an incentive, the latter plan can be a job hunting policy. However, if the latter is used as a method of strengthening the credits of undergraduate law as an evaluation factor for the law school admissions, which is effective even in the case of the above-mentioned departments of the Faculty of Law, it will be enough to train lawyers. Keywords : Law School, Crisis in Legal Education, Reform of Lawyer Examination, Training of Follow-up Generation and Legal Profesion, Regeneration of Academic Law