Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte


., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Basic Study on t

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

백서내지1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

<C1A63238B1C731C8A328C6EDC1FDC1DF292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


b77¹¼úÁ¤º¸š

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * The Meaning of Pl

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

380 Hyun Seok Choi Yunji Kwon Jeongcheol Ha 기존 선행연구에서는 이론연구 (Ki, 2010; Lee, 2012), 단순통계분석 (Lee, 2008), 회귀분석 (Kim, 2012)과 요인분석 (Chung, 2012), 경로분석 (Ku,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

44-6대지.08김정희-5

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: ICF Core Set : * Devel

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met


,......

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

<BFCFBCBA30362DC0B1BFECC3B62E687770>

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

(5차 편집).hwp

상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

한국 출산력의 저하 요인에 관한 연구

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

<C1A63236B1C72031C8A328C6EDC1FDC1DF292E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: The Exploratory Stu

레이아웃 1

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

서론 34 2

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.27-43 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.3.201809.27 * Strenghening the Capacity of Cultural Arts Required in Special Education Empirical Validation and its Usefulness Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the empirical validation and usefulness of psychological competence in order to analyzed the purpose of strengthening cultural arts competence for students with disabilities in special education. Method: In this study, 607 students with disabilities and special education teachers were participated for correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis to confirm the relationship and influence of psychological variables. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the relationship among cognitive, behavioral, and competency variables Results: Cognitive variables (perception, role perception, participation perception) were highly related to behavioral variables (experience, motivation), and behavioral variables showed a high influence on competence variables (cultural competence, artistic competence). Also, the structural model of cognition, behavior, and competency variables resulted in a meaningful relationship structure. Conclusion: This study derived the relevance and influence of the cultural arts competence structure model by analyzing the psychological competence in order to strengthen cultural arts competence for students with disabilities. These results will help students with disabilities to expend the scope of thinking and develop healthy mental health by expanding by establishing a psychological foundation to strengthen cultural arts competence. In addition, the ability to understand society and enjoy culture positively is expected to increase. Key words :cultural arts competence, psychological competence, students with disabilities * 2017 ( ). (NRF-2017S1A5B5A07063225). Corresponding Author: Kim, Jung-Suk. Pukyung National University, Liberal Arts Education, Yongsoro, Nam-Gu, Busan, Korea, e-mail: dance1202@daum.net

.,?. (2013),,. (, 2013).,,... (, 2016).,, (2018),,, (2016). (2010),,, (2008). (, 2014). (2015),,, 4

. (2016), / (2016). (2011). (disability).. (Simmel, 2015),..,,, (2013),,. (2015). (, 2012, 2015),..,,.,,..,

......,?,?,?,?,,., (Role Recognition), (Enjoy Recognition), (Participation Recognition) 3. (Role Recognition), (,,, 2014). (Enjoy Recognition). (Participation Recognition). (Experience) (Motivation), (Experience). (Motivation).

(Cultural Competency) (Artistic Competency) (,,,, ).. < -1>,,.,,.. < -1>. 620 30 590.., 10 20 166 454. 20.

(n=607) (n=30) (n=577) 153 10 143 454 20 434 121 10 111 30 0 30 2 0 2 25 0 25 36 0 36 87 10 77 (,, ) 5 0 5 7., (Role Recognition),, 3,, (2014). (Enjoy Recognition),,, 4 (Participation Recognition) 1. (Experience) 2, (Motivation),,, 4. (Cultural Competency), (TV,,, ),,,,,,, 5 (Artistic Competency)

,,,,,, 4 (2012). 3 (,, ) 3 (,, ). < -2>,, KMO Bartlett. Cronbach s α KMO Bartlett ** p<.01, *** p<.001 3 4 1 2 4 5 4.760.426 *** χ 2 =17.355.815.500 *** χ 2 =16.926.674.522 ** χ 2 =8.261 10 19 ( ).,. 3. (face-to-face interview survey) 13. Amos 17.0 SPSS 23.0. (1041386-20180518-HR-007-03).

. < -1> (,, ), (, ) (, ).,. (β=.82, p<.001), (β=.65, p<.001), (β=.60, p<.001), (β=.41, p<.001), (β=.72, p<.001), (β=.54, p<.001). (β=.68, p<.001), (β=.55, p<.001) (β=.70, p<.001), (β=.52, p<.001). B SE β C.R 2.24.17.82 4.96*** 1.90.36.65 3.22 *** 2.66.52.60 6.83*** χ 2 Q: 2.60 2.07.49.41 5.26 *** GFI:.90 2.92.12.72 6.60*** AGFI:.91 2.34.30.54 6.11 *** 4.01.43.68 5.29 TLI:93 *** 2.26.27.55 4.02 *** CFI:93 3.39.62.70 7.83 *** 2.50.41.52 7.06 *** *** p<.001

< -1>..46.77, χ 2 /df=q 2.60 GFI(.90) AGFI(.91) 200,,. < -2>. 3.5.. ( ) (2015, 2017) (2016). 2015. (, 2016) 3. M SD F (, 2015) 3.11.61 (, 2017) 3.59.38 ( ) 3.62.59 6.654 *** (, 2016) 3.83.80 - *** p<.001,,, < -3>.

1 -.044. 1.084.234 1.249.450 **.019 1.176 552 ***.082 -.049 1 ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (r²=.552) (r²=.450)..,,, (2013). < -4> (, ). B SE B β T.893.124 7.208 ***.609.153.615 3.991 ***.059.029.273 2.034 ** R²=.623 R=.388 Adjusted R²=.316 F=5.396 *** ** p<.01, *** p<.001.958.166 5.774 ***.426.152.362 2.802 **.523.132.518 3.979 *** R²=.705 R=.421 Adjusted R²=.421 F=6.519 ***

(R²) 62%(F=5.396, p<.001), (β=.615) (β=.273). (R²) 71%(F=6.519, p<.001), (β=.518) (β=.362)....,,,,,..,,...... (, 2017).

(cultural perspective) (, 2011).. (2015) (2016). (,, 2008)..,.,..,,.,,,,, (2013),.. (,, 2016).

..... (, 2017). (2016).,.,. (, 2015).,,., (2017). (disability) (, 2016;,, 2011;,, 2015),. (,, 2015;, 2005;, 2015;,,, 2014;,,,, 2013;,,,, 2013).

(, 2016). (,,, 2018;,, 2008;, 2016;, 2015;,,, 2017;, 2013;, 2010),.,,,... (,,,,, 2009). (, 2017)......

,, (2018).. 81-100., (2012).. (2), 187-206. (2016).. (4), 49-77., (2008).. (2), 131-156. (2016)..., (2016).. (4), 657-671., (2011).. (1), 117-140. (2012).. (3), 1-20. (2015).. (2), 75-92. (2017).. (4), 23-42. (2015)..., (2015). -. (2), 99-128. (2011).. 35-38.,, (2017).. (1), 45-77. (2005).. (2), 47-58.,,,, (2009). :. 12, 3-7. (2015)..

110-114. (2016). :. (1), 21-52. (2013).. 203-232. (2015).. 61-73., (2015).. (3), 35-71. (2010).. (1), 125-147. (2011).. 139-153., (2013).. (1), 209-236. (2016).. 29-59.,, (2014).. (3), 91-116.,,, (2013).. (1), 795-797.,,, (2013).. (1), 123-148., (2016).. (2), 143-164. Reynolds, F. (2002). A survey of opportunities and barriers to creative leisure activity for people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 63-67. Simmel, G. (2015). On Art Exhibitions. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(1), 87-92. : 2018.07.31. / : 2018.08.03. / : 2018.09.20.

:. : 607,,. : (,, ) (, ), (, ).,,. :...