ๆญฏ7๊ถŒ2ํ˜ธ.PDF

Similar documents
ๆญฏ๊น€์˜ํƒœ5-1.PDF

ๆญฏ6๊ถŒ2ํ˜ธ.PDF

ๆญฏ์ œ7๊ถŒ1ํ˜ธ(์ตœ์ข…ํŽธ์ง‘).PDF

ๆญฏ7๊ถŒ2ํ˜ธ.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

(5์ฐจ ํŽธ์ง‘).hwp

ๆญฏ์žฅ์„ ์•„5-2.PDF

ๆญฏ๋ฐฐ์†Œ์˜.PDF

ๆญฏ์ œ7๊ถŒ1ํ˜ธ(์ตœ์ข…ํŽธ์ง‘).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

ๆญฏ5-2-13(์ „๋ฏธํฌ์™ธ).PDF

์„์‚ฌ


ํŠน์ˆ˜๊ต์œก๋…ผ์ด * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

ๆญฏ6๊ถŒ2ํ˜ธ.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

ๆญฏ๊น€์˜ํƒœ๊น€์ˆ˜์ง„.PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

200609link.PDF

, (, 2000) (public management),,, ( ), (Parasuraman, 1988), Lacobucci(1996) (consumer evaluation),,, ( ) ( E x p e c t a t i o n ) (, 2001) Parasurama

ๆญฏ14.์–‘๋ˆ๊ทœ.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

๋ณด๊ฑด์‚ฌํšŒ์—ฐ๊ตฌ-25์ผ์ˆ˜์ •

a16.PDF

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

ๆญฏ6๊ถŒ2ํ˜ธ.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

ๆญฏ5-4-04(์œค์น˜์—ฐ์™ธ).PDF

118 ๊น€์ •๋ฏผ ์†ก์‹ ์ฒ  ์‹ฌ๊ทœ์ฒ  ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค(๊ฐ•์„์ง„ ๋“ฑ, 2000; ์‹ฌ๊ทœ์ฒ  ๋“ฑ, 2001; ์œค์น˜์› ๋“ฑ, 2005; ํ•˜ํƒœ๊ฒฝ ๋“ฑ, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). ๋ชจ๋‘  ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์›๋“ค์ด ๊ณต๋™์œผ ๋กœ ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ•™์Šต ๋ชฉํ‘œ์˜ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑ์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ์ž ๋งก์€ ์—ญํ• ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ•จ๊ป˜

ร€รŒรร–รˆรฑ.hwp

ํ•™์Šต์˜์—ญ์˜ Taxonomy์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆํ•œ CD-ROM Title์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ถ„์„

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

๋ฐ•์„ ์˜๋ฌด์„ ์ถฉ์ „-๋‚ด์ง€

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

09์˜ค์ถฉ์›(613~623)

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

์‹ ์„ธ๊ณ„

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

230 ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ต์œกํ•™์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ œ20๊ถŒ ์ œ3ํ˜ธ I. ์„œ ๋ก  ์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„์˜ ์–ธ์–ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฑฐ์น ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐœใ……ใ„ฒ, ใ…†ใ…‚๋†ˆ(๋…„), ๋ฏธ์นœใ…†ใ„ฒ, ๋‹ฅ์ณ, ์— ์ฐฝ, ๋’ค์ ธ ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ง์€ ์ฃผ์œ„์—์„œ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋“ค์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ธ€์ด ์ ์ฐจ ๋œ์†Œ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜ ๊ฑฐ์„ผ์†Œ๋ฆฌ๋กœ ๋ฐ”๋€Œ๊ณ , ์™ธ ๊ตญ์–ด ๋‚จ์šฉ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์ด๋ฒ„ ๋ฌธํ™”์˜ ์ต๋ช…์„ฑ ๋“ฑ

BEAA hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

ๆญฏ PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach ฮฑ=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

( )๋ฐ•์šฉ์ฃผ97.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy


ํ•œ๊ตญ์„ฑ์ธ์—์„œ์ดˆ๊ธฐํ™ฉ๋ฐ˜๋ณ€์„ฑ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋œ์œ„ํ—˜์š”์ธ์—ฐ๊ตฌ

09-๊น€์„ ์˜.hwp

16-๊ธฐ06 ํ™˜๊ฒฝํ•˜์ค‘237~246p

44-4๋Œ€์ง€.07์ด์˜ํฌ532~

54 ํ•œ๊ตญ๊ต์œก๋ฌธ์ œ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ œ 27 ๊ถŒ 2 ํ˜ธ, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

03ยฑรจร€รงรˆร–ยพรˆรยคร…ร‚

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: Operation Plan of W

<3231C1FD28C3D6C1BE292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

[ ์˜์–ด์˜๋ฌธํ•™ ] ์ œ 55 ๊ถŒ 4 ํ˜ธ (2010) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1) Kyuchul Yoon, Ji-Yeon Oh & Sang-Cheol Ahn. Teaching English prosody through English poems with clon

<28C3D6C1BE295FBEF0BEEEC3BBB0A D325F5F32B4DC2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

์ •๋ด‰์ˆ˜.PDF



ํ…€๋ธ”๋Ÿฌ514

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

์›๊ณ ์Šคํƒ€์ผ ์ •์˜

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach ฮฑ= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

ePapyrus PDF Document

04_์ด๊ทผ์›_21~27.hwp

์ƒ๋‹ดํ•™์—ฐ๊ตฌ,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

KD hwp

ยฐยกยฐร‡6ยฟรนยณยปรรถรƒร–รยพ

328 ้€€ๆบชๅญธ๊ณผ ้Ÿ“ๅœ‹ๆ–‡ๅŒ– ็ฌฌ43่™Ÿ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ธก๋ฉด์„ ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„œ์ˆ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์šฐ์„  ์ •๋„์ „์€ ๊ก”์ฃผ๋ก€๊ก•์—์„œ ์ •์น˜์˜ ๊ณต๊ณต์„ฑ ์ธก๋ฉด์„ ์ฃผ๋ชฉํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ตญ๊ฐ€, ์ •์น˜, ๊ถŒ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ๊ฒƒ์ด ์‚ฌ์ ์ธ ์†Œ์œ ๋ฌผ์ด ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ณต์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์ž„์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ์„ ์—์„œ ํ‘œ๋ฐฉํ•˜๋Š” ์œ 


Rheu-suppl hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Main Title

Output file

ร€รฅยพร–ยฟรยฐรญยฟรซ ยณยปรรถ


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Difference in Paren

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

์˜์ •์—ฐ๊ตฌ_36ํ˜ธ_0828.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

์ˆ˜ํƒ์—ฐ๊ตฌ01-09(์ˆ˜์š”์ž ์ค‘์‹ฌ1).hwp

2014๋ฐ๊ณ ๊ณ ์šด๋™์š”๋ถ€๋ฅด๊ธฐ-์ˆ˜์ •3

2005ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจํ‘œ์ง€

๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ˆ˜์ •๋ณธ.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: ICF Core Set : * Devel

AT_GraduateProgram.key

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Transcription:

(SELSI) : 1 1) ( ). (SELSI) :., 2002, 7, 2, 1-23. 3 (SELSI). SELSI 1090.,.. Cronbach.98.. 14.996,.998. :, SELSI,,,.,., 3.. 1 BK.,,. 1

3,. (babbling ),.. (joint attention ),., 3.., 3, (Bzoch, Kemker & Wood, 1987)., 3..,...,.,,., 3.,. De Villiers (1991) 8 2

(SELSI) : (, 1998 ): (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) /.,. 1.5 (, 1998). KEDI- WISC(, 1991) K - WPPSI(, 1997), K- BNT (, 1997) 1.5....,,, (Cronbach ) (, 1995;, 1998).. (sampling ).. 200, 5-10 (, 1998). (representation ). (simple random sampling )..,,,,. (, 1998). KEDI- WISC K- WPPSI,. 3

. (language age).,,, 6 4 4 (Lund & Duchan, 1993).. (, 1995;, 1998)., -,. (, 1995).,,, (, 1998). K - WPPSI,. KEDI- WISC,.... ( : K - WPPSI, IT PA, ).. 3. (Sequenced Language Scale for Infant s : SELSI),,. 4

(SELSI) :. 1. SELSI. (1), (2), (3). < - 1>. < - 1>.. (prosody).. 2.,,. + ( :, 2-3. ). 5. ( ).. ( :, ). < - 1> ( : & ). 3 5, 8. 3. 1 5

.. ASQ (Ages & Stages Questionnaires: A parent - completed, child - monitoring system; Brickers, Squires & Mountes, 1995). PLS (Preschool Language Scale; Zimmerman & Steiner, 1979). PRES (Preschool Receptive- Expressive Language Scale;, 2000a, 2000b). REEL (Receptive- Expressive Emergent Language Scale; Bzoch & League, 1971) T he Rossetti Infant- T oddler Language Scale (Rossetti, 1990). Language Development : An introduction (Owens, 1998). (, 1992) 5- (, 1990). 2 23 2, 24 35 3. 24, 24... (, ), (, ), (, ),. 2. 1. 1, 2. 1 0-36, 12 1, 24 2, 36 3, 22. 4, 88. 6

(SELSI) : 3, 7. 1 7,,,. 3. 2 2 1, 2 23 2, 24 36 3, 15 15., 25 4 6.,, 248. 10, 10-20, 20-36. (ceiling effect ),. 10 2-9 10-14, 10-19 6-920 - 23, 20-36 16-19., 15 233. 2 ( ).90, < - 2>. < - 2> 2 10 10-20 20-36.9108 (n = 31).9169 (n = 38).9313 (n = 38).9259 (n = 32).9064 (n = 37).9559 (n = 35),,,.,., 7

, 9.,., 4., ²,.,. 15 5, 75., 75 75, 150. 4.. 2-35, 2-35 20-40. 1000 1000. 15.,,,. 1 % 15. < - 3> 1.5... 2 75 75. 1 2., 3, 7 35., 35, 70. 8

(SELSI) : < - 3> ( ) 240 (16 15) 24 % 353 (32.4 %) 90 (6 15) 60 (4 15) 24 % 257 (23.6 %) 90 (6 15) 30 (2 15) 3 % 19 (1.7 %) 90 (6 15) 45 (3 15) 13 % 162 (14.9 %) 45 (3 15) 30 (2 15) 10 % 107 (9.8 %) 30 (2 15) 90 (6 15) 105 (7 15) 25 % 255 (17.6 %) 60 (4 15) 1005 1090., 1508.,,,.. 1 1 (data cleaning ). 1090. (1) 9

, (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) 2, (7) 3.. < - 3> 32.4 %, 23.6 %, 1.7 %, 14.9 %, 9.8 %, 17.6 %. 67.3 % (< - 4> )., 57853.0 % 50746.5 %, 0.5 %. < - 4> ( ) (%) ( ) 734 356 67.3 32.7 578 507 5 53.0 46.5.5 1090 15 < - 5> 52-964.8-8.8 %. 10

(SELSI) : < - 5> ( ) (%) 2-3 66 6.1 4-5 81 7.4 6-7 81 7.4 8-9 57 5.2 10-11 72 6.6 12-13 96 8.8 14-15 75 6.9 16-17 73 6.7 18-19 65 6.0 20-21 62 5.7 22-23 52 4.8 24-26 70 6.4 27-29 84 7.7 30-32 74 6.8 33-35 82 7.5 1090 100.0. (1).. (2). 0.2. 2-3 ( 5, 5 ) 2-3., 4. 11

(3),. 4 35, 14 4, 56 56, 112. (4).,., 2. (item response theory ), (,, )., (parameter ).,.,. (empirical).,., 14. / ²..01. 12

(SELSI) :. < - 1> < - 2>.. 1.., < - 6>, < - 7>.,, 0.85,.. 14.01 ². 14. 2.. (Cronbach ). < - 8>,.9861,.9859,.9929.. 13

< - 6>, 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-26 27-29 30-32 33-35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 0.9929 0.9674 0.9634 0.9654 0.9502 0.9379 0.9105 0.9003 0.8932 0.8535 0.8484 0.8342 0.8383 0.8159 0.7976 0.7497 0.7528 0.7447 0.6846 0.6694 0.6460 0.6419 0.6419 0.6358 0.6348 0.6063 0.5809 0.5483 0.5443 0.5381 0.5310 0.5097 0.5025 0.4995 0.4924 0.4730 0.4466 0.4446 0.4069 0.3988 0.3418 0.3306 0.3174 0.2818 0.3093 0.2594 0.2665 0.2401 0.2309 0.1790 0.1709 0.1770 0.1668 0.1628 0.1119 0.0793-3.00-2.79 - - 2.43-2.26-1.94-1.59-1.49-1.41-1.18-1.16-1.10-1.13-1.06-0.96-0.86-0.80-0.78-0.59-0.54-0.47-0.46-0.46-0.44-0.44-0.36-0.28-0.19-0.18-0.16-0.14-0.08-0.06-0.05-0.03 0.02 0.09 0.10 0.20 0.22 0.39 0.42 0.46 0.57 0.49 0.63 0.64 0.69 0.72 0.88 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.94 1.23 1.39 1.01 0.85 0.96 1.04 0.99 1.21 1.51 1.63 1.83 2.02 1.90 2.10 1.86 1.76 1.92 1.46 2.25 2.09 2.48 1.87 2.43 2.08 2.28 2.26 2.15 2.30 1.84 2.39 2.37 2.30 2.35 2.40 2.20 2.36 2.31 2.12 2.24 2.26 2.48 2.37 2.48 1.59 2.31 2.35 2.12 1.60 2.01 2.40 1.55 1.56 14

(SELSI) : < - 7>, 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 20-21 22-23 24-26 27-29 30-32 33-35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 0.9339 0.9742 0.9690 0.9452 0.9180 0.9161 0.9172 0.8921 0.8995 0.8738 0.8128 0.8268 0.8116 0.7882 0.7896 0.7793 0.7477 0.7220 0.7184 0.7144 0.7164 0.6656 0.6197 0.5815 0.5800 0.5726 0.5348 0.5254 0.4642 0.4663 0.4585 0.4575 0.4482 0.4617 0.4161 0.3803 0.3628 0.3606 0.3499 0.3340 0.3116 0.2754 0.2332 0.2344 0.2681 0.2285 0.2114 0.1824 0.2178 0.1455 0.1415 0.1408 0.1620 0.1269 0.1250 0.0960-1.97-2.64-2.56-1.95-1.83-1.62-1.62-1.51-1.49-1.37-1.06-1.05-0.99-0.93-0.91-0.87-0.77-0.69-0.67-0.66-0.67-0.53-0.40-0.31-0.30-0.28-0.18-0.16 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.13 0.23 0.28 0.28 0.31 0.36 0.43 0.54 0.70 0.66 0.56 0.69 0.74 0.84 0.72 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.91 1.03 1.04 1.18 1.10 0.99 1.00 1.32 1.08 1.48 1.54 1.35 1.59 1.47 1.57 2.04 2.00 1.79 2.00 2.49 2.36 2.33 2.28 2.05 2.15 2.32 2.25 2.33 2.12 2.41 2.37 2.23 2.12 2.47 1.64 2.28 2.37 2.13 2.15 2.20 2.18 2.33 2.14 2.44 2.01 2.28 2.06 15

< - 8> (n = 75) (n = 75) ( : ) (n = 150) 0.9861 0.9859 0.9929. 56 56 (test - retest reliability ). 14 1. 14 1 (test ) 2 (retest ). < - 9>.996,.998.998.. < - 9> (n = 28) **p <.01.996 * *.998 * *.998 * *. 3 SELSI.,,., Spearman - Brown 16

(SELSI) :, 40.67, 80.80 (, 1995). SELSI 56, 112., 5 ( ) 13 1090. 112 9.7 (, 1998).,. 2-3,,.., (,, ). SELSI,,., 88 1, 233 2, 1090.,..98 Cronbach.. 1 14.99. SELSI 3. (,, ).,,.,. 17

(2000a). (PRES) :., 5(1), 77-101. (2000b). (PRES)., 35(2), 1-19. (1997). (K- BNT, Korean version- Boston Naming T est). :. (1992). KEDI- WISC. :. (1997). K- WPPSI. :. (1995).. :. (1990). 5:. :. (1992).. :. (1998).. :. Bricker, D., Squires, J. & Mountes, L. (1995). A g es and S tag es Questionaire: A parent- comp leted, child- monitoring system. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Bzoch, K. R. & League, R. (1971). R ecep tive- Exp ressive Em erg ent Lang uag e Scale. Austin, T X: Pro- Ed. Bzoch, K. R., Kemker, F. J. & Wood, V. D. (1987). The prevention of communicative disorders in cleft palate infants. In W. J. Lass (Ed.), Sp eech and lang uag e: A dvances in basic research and p ractice. San Francisco: Academic Press. De Villiers, J. G. (1995). Questioning minds and answering machines. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), P roceedings of the 19th A nnual B oston University Conf erence on Lang uag e D evelopm ent. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Lund, N. J. & Duchan, J. F. (1993). A ssessing children s lang uag e in naturalistic contexts (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall. Owens, R. (1998). Lang uag e developm ent: A n introduction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Rossetti, L. (1990). Infant- toddler lang uag e scale. Moline, IL: Linqui Systems. Zimmerman, I. L. & Steiner, V. G. (1979). P reschool lang uag e scale manual. Columbus, OH: Bell & Howell Company. 18

(SELSI) : < - 1> SELSI * 4-5 1. ( : ). 2.. 3. ( :, ). 4.,,. 6-7 5. ( :, ). 6.,, ( : ). 7.. 8. ( ). 8-9 9. ( ). 10., ( :, ). 11.. 12. ( :,, ) (3-5 ). 10-11 13. ( :, ). 14.. 15.. 16.. 12-13 17. ( :, ). 18.?. 19. ( :,, ). 20.. 14-15 21.. 22. ( :,,,, ). 23. ( :? ). 24. ( : ) 16-17 25. ( :,, ) 1. 26.. 27. 2 ( : ). 28. ( : ). 18-19 29. ( ) 2 ( : ). * [ : : ]. 19

30. 4. 31. ( : ). 32. ( : ). 20-21 33. + ( :, ). 34. ( :, ). 35. 10 ( :,, ). 36. 2 ( :, ). 22-23 37. ( : ). 38. ( :,, ) 3-4. 39. ( :, ) 1. 40. ( :! ) ( :? ). 24-26 41. ( :,, ). 42. ( :?,? ). 43. 5 ( : ). 44. ( :,, ) 3. 27-29 45.. 46. - ", - ( ) ( )", - ( / ) " ( :,, ). 47. ( : ). 48. ( : ). 30-32 49. ( : ). 50.,. 51. ( :, ). 52. ( :?,? ). 33-35 53.,,, 2. 54. ( : ). 55.. ( :, ( ), ) 56. ( :,, ) 5. 20

(SELSI) : < - 2> SELSI 4-5 1. (: ). 2. 2( :,, ). 3. ( : ). 4.,,, ( :,,, ). 6-7 5.. 6. 2 ( :, ). 7.,. 8.. 8-9 9.. 10. ( :,, ). 11.. 12.. 10-11 13. ( : (2 ) (2 ) ). 14. ( : ). 15.. 16. (conventional gestures) ( :,, ). 12-13 17.. 18.. 19. ( : ( ), ( ), ). 20. ( : ) ( :, ). 14-15 21.. 22.. 23. ( :!, ). 24. 4. 16-17 25.,,,. 26. ( ). 27. (). 28. ( :, ). 2 1

18-19 29. ( ). 30. 3 4( : ). 31. ( + ) ( :, ). 32. T V (). 20-21 33.? 1. 34. ( :,, ). 35. 10 20. 36. ( :?,?,? ). 22-23 37. ( :, ). 38. 5. 39. ( :,, ). 40. ( :? ). 24-26 41. ( :,? ). 42. ( :,, ). 43. ( : ). 44. ( :, ). 27-29 45.. 46. ( :? ). 47.? (?,?,? ). 48. ( :, ). 30-32 49.,,,. 50.,. 51. ( :,, ( ) ). 52.. 33-35 53.. 54.. 55. ( : ). 56. ( ) ( :, ). 22

(SELSI) : AB ST RA CT Content an d Reliability An aly ses of the Sequen ced Lan guage Scale for In fant s (SELSI) Y ou n g T a e K im (Dept. of Special Education & Interdisciplinary Program of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) T his study was designed to analyze the content and reliability of the SELSI (Sequenced Language Scale for Infants ). T he SELSI has been developed to assess 4- to 35- month - old infants receptive and expressive language abilities through the parents report. Items of the SELSI were developed on the bases of the language development and disorder literature and the two pilot studies, using 326 normal children. In addition, 1090 normal children served as the participants for the normative data. Using the baseline and ceiling sy stem, SELSI screens the infant s who are at risk of language disorder s. T he item s of the SELSI were arranged based on (1) difficulty level, (2) % of correct respon ses, and (3) discriminative level for the equivalent age. T here was no sex difference among the items. F or reliability analy ses, internal reliability and test - retest reliability were calculated. Cronbach in both receptive and expressive language test s were.99. Correlations betw een the first and second test s with one w eek interval in 14 participant s were.99 in both receptive and expressive language test s. : 2002 5 30 : 2002 7 16 :, e- mail: youngtae@ewha.ac.kr 23