KISEP Original Articles 38 6 1999 J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 38, No 6 한국판상호애착척도의신뢰도와타당도연구 Ⅰ * 김휘중 ** 원승희 *** 임효덕 ** A Reliability and Validity Study of the Reciprocal Attachment Questionnaire Korean VersionRAQ-K * Hwi-Jung Kim, M.D.,** Seung-Hee Won, M.D.,*** Hyo-Deog Rim, M.D.** 국문초록연구목적 : 방법 : 결과 : 결론 : This paper was partly presented at the Annual Academic Meeting of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association on Oct. 23, 1998, Seoul Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Taegu Department of Psychiatry, Kyungsang Hospital, Kyungsan Corresponding author 1376
중심단어 서 론 1377
1. 연구대상 연구대상과방법 2. 평가척도 1) RAQ 1378
2) RAQ의번역 3) 검사시행 4) 평가방법 1379
Table 1. Sex and attachment figure Mother Peerthe other sex Peerthe same sex Others Total Male 4217.95% 12553.42% 4117.52% 2611.11% 234100% Female 4819.28% 9136.55% 6927.21% 4116.47% 249100% Total 9018. 6% 21644. 7% 11022. 8% 6713. 9% 483100% 2 15.789, P0.010 Table 2. Demographic profiles of subjects-peer group attachment figure Total Sex Male Female Attachment figure Peerthe other sex Peerthe same sex Present living arrangement Live alone Live with attachment figure Live with other people Have known attachment figure Less than one year Between one and five years More than five years Frequency 289100% 14249.1% 14750.9% 18162.6% 10837.4% 3712.8% 6 2.1% 24585.1% 24 8.3% 16757.8% 9833.9% 3. 자료분석 1) 신뢰도 2) 타당도 결 과 1. 성별에따른애착대상선호도 2. 신뢰도검정 1) 내적일치도 1380
Table 3. Mean and standard deviation for the RAQ-K subscales Male Female MeanSD MeanSD P Dimension Proximity seeking 7.732.52 8.182.40 0.12 Separation protest 7.582.25 7.242.10 0.18 Feared loss 8.112.55 7.212.21 0.00* Availability 7.351.68 6.971.86 0.07 Use 7.901.80 7.371.79 0.01* Patterns Compulsive self-reliance 17.873.89 17.103.66 0.08 Compulsive care-seeking 16.733.75 17.433.81 0.11 Angry withdrawal 17.874.78 17.213.90 0.20 Compulsive care-giving 24.213.50 23.103.66 0.00* Table 4-1. Reliability statistics for RAQ-K dimension scales Dimension Initial Retest Proximity seeking Internal* 0.810.71 0.81 Test-retest** 0.760.82 Separation protest Internal* 0.660.78 0.60 Test-retest** 0.710.76 Feared loss Internal* 0.670.83 0.67 Test-retest** 0.790.81 Availability Internal* 0.260.85 0.26 Test-retest** 0.660.68 Use Internal* 0.440.74 0.45 Test-retest** 0.710.77 *Crohnbach s alpha coefficient of internal consistency **Pearson s product moment correlation coefficient data of West Sheldon-Keller1994 Table 4-2. Reliability statistics for RAQ-K pattern scales Patterns Initial Retest Compulsive self-reliance Internal* 0.650.73 0.68 Test-retest** 0.780.77 Compulsive care-seeking Internal* 0.720.77 0.77 Test-retest** 0.830.75 Angry withdrawal Internal* 0.740.80 0.71 Test-retest** 0.800.54 Compulsive care-giving Internal* 0.720.70 0.73 Test-retest** 0.810.79 *Crohnbach s alpha coefficient of internal consistency **Pearson s product moment correlation coefficient data of West Sheldon-Keller1994 2) 검사 - 재검사신뢰도 3) 하위척도간상관관계 1381
Table 5-1. RAQ-K dimension scales intercorrelation Dimension Separation protest Feared loss Availability Use Proximity seeking 0.58*0.45 0.21*0.34 0.05 0.16 0.36*0.18 Separation protest 0.44*0.52 0.22*0.40 0.19* 0.18 Feared loss 0.54*0.57 0.20* 0.32 Availability 0.33* 0.55 *p0.05, data of West Sheldon-Keller1994 Table 5-2. RAQ-K pattern scales intercorrelation Patterns Compulsive care-seeking Angry withdrawal Compulsive care-giving Compulsive self-reliance 0.21*0.08 0.37*0.61 0.22*0.24 Compulsive care-seeking 0.34*0.36 0.38*0.37 Angry withdrawl *p0.05, data of West Sheldon-Keller1994 0.15*0.08 Table 6-1. Factor analysis of RAQ-K dimension scales Dimension Factor 1 Factor 2 Proximity seeking 0.872 Separation protest 0.806 Feared loss 0.810 Availability 0.852 Use 0.610 Eigen values 2.009 1.684 Cumulative 0.401 0.739 Table 6-2. Factor analysis of RAQ-K pattern scales Patterns Factor 1 Factor 2 Compulsive self-reliance 0.872 Compulsive care-seeking 0.840 Angry withdrawal 0.825 Compulsive care-giving 0.773 Eigen values 1.609 1.383 Cumulative 0.402 0.748 4. 구성타당도 고찰 1382
1383
1384
참고문헌 1) Bowlby J(1958):The nature of the child s tie to his mother. Intern J Psychoanalysis 39:350-373 2) West M, Sheldon-Keller AE(1994):Patterns of relating:an adult attachment perspective. New York, The Guilford Press 3) Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Walls S (1978):Patterns of attachment:a psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum 4) Hinde RA(1982):Attachment:Some conceptual and biological issues. The place of attachment in human behavior In:Ed by Parkes CM and Stevenson J-Hinde, New York, Basic Books, pp66-76 5) Bowlby J(1977):The making and breaking of affectional bonds. Br J Psychiatry 130:201-210 6) Sroufe LA(1988):The role of infant-caregiver attachment in development. In:Belsky J and Nezworski, Clinical Implications of Attachment. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum 7) Parkes CM(1969):Separation anxiety:an aspect of the search for a lost object. In:Studies of anxiety. Ed by Lader MH(Br J Psychiatry special publication No. 3), Headley Bros, Ashford, Kent, pp87-92 8) Weiss RS(1982):Attachment in adult life. In:The place of attachment in human behavior, Ed by Parkes CM and Stevenson J-Hinde, New York, Basic Books, pp171-184 9) West M, Sheldon AER, Reiffer L(1987):An approach to the delineation of adult attachment:scale development and reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis 175: 738-741 10) Sperling MB, Berman WH(1994):Attachment in adults. New York, Guilford Press 11) 윤승경 (1989): 청년기자녀의애착과독립성에관한연구 ( 석사학위 ). 이화여자대학교대학원 12) 박은경 (1992): 애착유형이자존감및대인관계에미치는영향-대학생집단을중심으로-( 석사학위 ). 이화여자대학교대학원 13) 장미희 (1995): 애착유형과사랑유형과의관계연구-신학생들의사랑경험을중심으로-( 석사학위 ). 침례신학교대학원 14) 김덕일 (1996): 애착유형에따른부부간의사랑유형과결혼만족도 ( 석사학위 ). 전남대학교대학원 15) 박의순 (1996): 애착과정으로본한국부부의사랑 ( 박사학위 ). 이화여자대학교대학원 16) 조현주, 현명호, 정희연, 박인준 (1997): 성인애착유형이부부만족도에미치는영향. 97년하계학술대회, 수원, 한국심리학회산하임상심리학회 17) 유은희 (1990): 기혼자녀의부모에대한애착및자율성발달유형과결혼만족도 ( 박사학위 ). 이화여자대학교대학원 18) 박희성 (1993): 기혼자녀의친모에대한애착과 갈등에관한연구 ( 석사학위 ). 서울대학교대학원 19) 안동현 (1997): 애착 : 그임상적의미. 정신건강 1385
연구 16:115-124 20) George C, Kaplan N, Main M(1985):Adult attachment interview. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology University of California, Berkeley 21) Feeney JA, Noller P, Hanrahan M(1994):Assessing adult attachment. In:Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives. Ed by Sperling MB and Berman WH, New York, The Guilford Press, pp128-152 22) Sperling MB, Foelsch P, Grace C(1996):Measuring adult attachment:are self-report instruments congruent?. J Pers Assess 67(1):37-51 23) Hazan C, Shaver P(1987):Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:511-524 24) Hindy CG, Schwarz JC, Bodsky A(1989):If this is love why do I feel so insecure. Atlantic Monthly, New York 25) Simpson JA(1990):Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 59: 971-980 26) Collins NL, Read SJ(1990):Adult attachment, working models, and relations hip quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol 58:644-663 27) Sperling MB, Berman WH(1991):An attachment classification of desperate love. J Pers Assess 56: 45-55 28) Kaplan RM, Grant I(1995):Statistics and experimental design. In:Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. 6th ed, Ed by Kaplan HI and Sadock BJ, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, pp412-429 29) West M, Levesely J, Reiffer L, Sheldon AER (1986):The place of attachment in the life events models of stress and illness. Can J Psychiatry 31 (3):202-207 30) Hill JP, Lynch ME(1983):The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In:Ed by Brooks-Gunn J and Petersen AC, Girls at Puberty:Biological and Psychosocial perspectives. New York, Plenum, pp201-229 31) Stern L(1989):Conception of separation and connection in female adolescents. In:Ed by Gilligan C, Lyons NP and Hanmer TJ, Making connections:the relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Troy, NY, Emma Willard School, pp73-87 32) Compas BE, Wagner BM(1991):Psychosocial stress during adolescence:intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. In:Ed by Colton ME and Gore S, Adolescent stress:causes and consequences. New York, Aldine/De Gruyter, pp67-85 33) Hetherington EM, Cox M, Cox R(1985):Longterm effects of divorce and remarriage on the adjustment of children. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 24 (5):518-530 34) West M, Sheldon AER(1988):The classification of pathological attachment patterns in adults. J Pers Dis 2:153-160 35) 조두영 (1986): 임상행동과학. 일조각, pp51-55 36) Ainsworth MDS(1977):Attachment theory and its utility in cross-cultural research. In:Ed by Leiderman PH, Tulkin SR and Rosenfeld A, Culture and infancy. Variation in the human experience. New York:Academic Press, pp49-67 37) Marinus H, van IJzendoorn, Pieter M, Kroonenberg(1988):Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: A meta-analysis of the strange situation. Child Dev 59:147-156 38) Sato T, Sakado K, Uehara T, Nishioka K, Kasahara Y(1997):Perceived parental styles in a japanese sample of depressive disorders. Br J Psychiatry 170:173-175 1386
ABSTRACT J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc Vol 38, No 6, November, 1999 A Reliability and Validity Study of the Reciprocal Attachment Questionnaire Korean VersionRAQ-K Hwi-Jung Kim, M.D., Seung-Hee Won, M.D., Hyo-Deog Rim, M.D. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Taegu ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to develop the Reciprocal Attachment Questionnaire-Korean versionraq-k. MethodsThe authors tested the reliability of dimensional and pattern scales of RAQ-K with Crohnbach s alpha, test-retest reliability and interscale correlation, and construct validity with factor analysis. The subjects were Korean undergraduate students234 males and 249 females in the medical and nursing schools of Kyungpook National University. ResultsThe dimensional scale of RAQ-K proved to be reliable in terms of Crohnbach s alpha coefficient except Availability and Use subscales, test-retest reliability and interscale correlation. The pattern scales of RAQ-K were reliable. Both dimensional and pattern scales were valid with two factor orthogonal rotation. ConclusionThe authors found RAQ-K retained available psychometric properties. But further study with some consideration to develop RAQ-K is expected. This research should assess samples of various age groups or various kinds of patients after considering two subscales. The authors stress that it is very important to consider the cultural difference between the East and the West and characteristics of Korean culture in developing a Korean version of foreign scales. KEY WORDSReciprocal Attachment Questionnaire-Korean version Adult Attachment Attachment Reliability Validity. 1387
부 록 한국판상호애착척도 1 *. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8,. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16,. 17,. 18,. 19. 20,. 21. 22. 23. * 1388
24. 25. 26. 27. 28,. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34,. 35,. 36. 37. 38,. 39. 40. 41. 42,. 43,. 1389