Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.26.1.201604.1 *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( ).,,,. * 2014. 2015. ** 1, : (E-mail: cajoo@pusan.ac.kr)
.,.,,,.., 1960 1970, 1980, 1990 (, 2010)..,,..,..,,,....,,, (Cheng, 2006)...,,,,..
. 1,,,,,. 1960 1 80. 1970 2000 10 12. 1960,. OECD PISA TIMMS.., 1, OECD,.. 75% 1 2 (, 2015)..,,, (, 2014;, 2014)., top-down,,,, (, 2014).,,,.,, (, 2006)., (, 2010, 2012).,,,,,,, (, 2014;, 2014)..,,,,,,,,,
. 2000,, (, 2009)., 2010 (, 2014;,, 2011).,, (, 2010, 2012; Ravitch, 2010, 2011).,,.,,,,,., 1970,.,,,,,,, (Adams, 2010).,,, (, 2004).,.,,.,,.
. 19,..,,, 3,, 5 (1985 ) (, 1999).,,,.. 6.25,. 1 (1948 1960) 1960 4 19 2. 1949, 1950,.,,. 3, 4 (1961 1980) 5.16. 1968,. 1974. 5 (1983 1987) 4. 5 1980 7 30.,, 5. 6 (1988 1992),
,,,, 31. (, 2014). (1993 1997) 1994 2 1995 5. 5.31,,,, GNP 5%.,, (, 2007). (1998 2002), 21...,, (, 2007). (2003 2007),. (, ),, (, )., (, 2007). (2008 2012) ( 300 ),, (,, ).,, (, 2010). (2013 ),
,,,.,, (, 2015).,.,, (, 2014).,,.,,,.,.., 6-3-3-4. 1960,., 1974. 1990 (, 2010)., 1990 IMF,,. 2000.,.,.. (, 2010)..,
.,.,.,. (excellence).,,., 1995.,,.,,,.,.,. 18.. 2,. 1980 6.29,. 1990,,.,.,,.,,,, (, 2006).., 7.30.,,,,,
,, (, 1999).,,.,.,.,,,.,,.. (, 2015;, 2014).,,.,. 5,,., (, 2015;, 2015;, 2014).,..,,, (, 2015).,.,,.,., 15.,
., (,, 2008)., 2000, ( )., (,, 2008).,. 1991, 2006.., 2010., - -.,.,,.,,, SNS.,,,,.,. 1950.,,, (, 2006)..,., (, 2010).
., (30.8%) (55.5%) (, 2015)., (,, ). 6.,..,.,.,.,..,., 5.31,.,,,,, (, 2015).. (WCED, 1987).,,..,,, (, 2015; UNESCO, 2005).,,,
.,,..,,,, (, 2011;, 2014).,.,.,,,,.,.,,.,..,,,,.., (2010) 2020.,,,,,.,,.,.,, 24.,.,,,..,.
,,,.,., (, 2003)., (, 2010)..., (, 2006)., (Cheng, 2006).. UNESCO(1996) (Learning to know), (Learning to do), (Learning to live together), (Learning to be)., ESD(Education for Sustainable Development),, (UNESCO, 2005)., Trilling Fadel(2009) 21 ( ), (,, ), ( )., 2..,,.,, 2.,.,,,.,
..,,.,.,,.,,,..,,..,,, - - -.,.,, ( )..,., - - - -, - -.,,,,,., (,, SNS )., - -
.,.,,.,..,,,., ( ).,..,.,,.,.,., 6 5 6 7.,..,.,,.
..,,,.,,,..,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( ).,,,.,,,,,.,,., (2008).. (4), 293-317. (2015).. (2007) 2030.
(2010). :..,,,,,,, (2011).. (2006).. 2006, 27-32. (2015). 5.31., 3-14. (2006).., 13-32. (2015).. 2015, 69-86. (2015).. 2015, 3-34. (2015).. 2015, 163-193. (2014).. 2, 21-28. (2010)..,,,,,,,,,, (2014).., (2011). :. (1999).. 1999, 41-60. (2003). -., 1-16.,,,, (2014).,,. (3), 667-688. (1999).. 1999, 1-14.,,, (2010)... (2015).. 2015,
42-65. (2004).. (2010).. (1), 41-57. (2014). -. 171, 3-16. (2015)., 2015.5.14. (2014). :.,,,,,,, (2009).. (2010). Mudigkeitsgesellschaft, (2012).. (2006). -. 2006, 15-24. Adams, D. (2010)..,. Ravitch, D. (2010). The Death and Life of the Great America School System, (2011).. Cheng, Y. C. (2006). School Reforms and World-Class Education: Three Waves and Paradigm Shifts. Trends and Tasks of Educational Reform in the East Asian Nations, BK21,. Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons. UNESCO (1996). Learning: the treasure within, report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. UNESCO Publishing. UNESCO (2005). United nations decade of education for sustainable development 2005-2014. draft International Implementation Scheme. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Futur. UN. : 2016.02.24 / : 2016.03.04 / : 2016.03.29
Diagnosis & Redesign of Korean educational policy and system After its Liberation The purpose of this study was to diagnose and redesign Korean educational policy and system after its liberation. Based upon prior literature, it examined bright and dark aspects of Korean educational development, diagnosis & solutions of Korean educational problems. Specifically, it analyzed major characteristics of Korean educational policies and systems in terms of governmental policies, educational goals, educational system, & policy process, school system. The findings of the study were as follows: First, it proposed re-conceptualization of educational ideal which underlies the foundation of educational policies. Second, it proposed the strengthening of character education, self-autonomous life skills, democratic citizenship, ecological education etc. as educational ideals and goals for sustainable society. Third, it proposed healthy educational policy ecology, learning network of schools, collaboration of schools at different levels, collaborative governance among central governmental departments, and among central government, local government, teachers' associations etc. Fourth, it also proposed improvement of competitive educational climate, integration of early education and nursery education systems, providing education service for student outside of formal school system, etc. Key words : Korean educational policy and system, diagnosis, redesign