Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: Exploring Education

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

,......

(5차 편집).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: : C An Exploration

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯1.PDF

<31342DC0CCBFEBBDC42E687770>

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: ICF Core Set : * Devel


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

서론 34 2

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

부산교육 311호

44-4대지.07이영희532~

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특


12이문규

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö


<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>


:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

KD hwp

ePapyrus PDF Document

<B1B3B9DFBFF83330B1C7C1A631C8A35FC6EDC1FDBABB5FC7D5BABB362E687770>


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel


<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

Rheu-suppl hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.1-22 DOI: * An Analysis of the Ext

Research subject change trend analysis of Journal of Educational Information and Media Studies : Network text analysis of the last 20 years * The obje


Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.25-46 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.26.2.201608.25 * A Study on the Research Trends of College Students' Leadership in Korea Purpose: analyze college students' leadership researches in Korea and draw the implications for the desirable directions Method: we searched and analyzed 53 articles published from 2005 to 2014. According to the frame of analysis based upon previous research, we have categorized college students leadership into three parts: models, main subjects, and methodology. Results: First, the studies on college students leadership were more focused on the self-leadership model, more than 38 percent of the analyzed articles. Second, in terms of the research subjects, development of college students' self-leadership program, the relationships between college students' self-leadership and self-efficacy/problem-solving ability etc. were covered repeatedly. Third, quantitative research methods were much more employed than qualitative research methods in college students' leadership studies. Conclusion: Through this study, several suggestions on the direction for future research were identified as follows. First, it is needed to conduct multiple researches and various models of college students' leadership. Second, A study of the concept and theory of college students' leadership is conducted systematically. Third, the classification by theoretical studies on the college students' leadership needs to be refined. We should proceed to the other theoretical frames more than from self-leadership theory. Key words : college student, leadership, research trends * (2 ). Corresponding Author: Joo, Chul-An, Pusan National University, Dept. of Education, Busandaehakro, Jangjeondong, Busan, Korea, e-mail: cajoo@pusan.ac.kr

.. 21,. 1,, (, 2003). 20,,,, (, 2005).. (,,,, 2005;, 2003).,, (, 2009)., (,,,,, 2003;, 2007)..,., (,,,, 2014).,,,..,.

., 2005 2014?,,,?,?.,,,, (2003),,,,..,.. (,, 2008).....,..,...,,. (, 2011).,,.

,,,.,,., (2009).,,. (, 2009) (2007) 10 (1996 2006 ) 38..,,,,,,,,,,.,, -.,,,, (, 2007). (2007), (2009). (2007),,,. (2009) 1998 2008 20 83 (,,,, ), (,,,, ), (,, ). (2009),,,,.

.,,,,.,. 1940, 1950 60 (, 2003, 2003), 1970 80. 1980 90. (, 2002). (2006). (Manz, 1986), (Greenleaf, 1970), (Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee, 2002) (, 2008). < -1>. 1940 (, ) 1950 60 1970 1980 1980 2000 : (2006).... (,, )

(, 2007). Leithwood Duke(1999),,,,, 6 (2007) 6. (2009),,, /,. (2011) (,, ),,.,,,,, 1) 6.,.. (2009),,, 4. (2009),,,, 5. (Eich, 2008), (Kan & Reichard, 2009), (Thurston & Middendorf, 2009)..,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,.,.. Hartley Hinksman(2003) Lee Yarger(1996) (, ) (,, ). (2009),,. 1) Leithwood Duke(1999),.

,,, 4. < -2>.,,,,,,,,,,,, (www.riss.kr), (, ) 2005 2014 10. 1 334 ( 142, 334 ). 1,, 89. 18, 35, 53., < -3>.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 0 2 4 6 6 18 7 6 6 9 7 35 7 8 10 15 13 53 53.,,..,.,,.... < -1>. 1 3 1 2 10 1 18 4 1 5 2 11 12 35 5 4 6 4 21 13 53

53 21, 13, 6, 5, 4.. 1) 특성이론 1, 4 5. (, 2013;,, 2012), (,, 2006;,, 2008;, 2010). 2) 행동이론 3, 1 4. (, 2012;, 2013;, 2009), (, 2011). 3) 상황이론 1, 5 6. (, 2008;, 2008),,, (, 2010;, 2008;,, 2010;, 2013). 4) 변혁적리더십 2, 2 4. (,, 2013;, 2010), (, 2006;, 2014). 5) 셀프리더십, 10, 11 21. / / /

(,, 2014;, 2009;, 2007;, 2011;, 2011;, 2009;, 2013;, 2012;,,, 2014;,, 2012;,, 2013;,, 2011, 2012;, 2013), (, 2013;, 2012;,, 2012;,, 2012), / (, 2011;, 2013;, 2005). 6) 일반적리더십 (, 2010;,, 2008;, 2009;, 2008;,, 2010), (,,,, 2014;, 2011;,,,, 2005;, 2011), (, 2005, 2008)... 1, 12 13. < -2>. 2 4 2 9 1 18 5 8 8 13 1 35 7 12 10 22 2 53 2, 5 7, 4, 8 12, 2, 8 10, 9, 13 22. RSLQ (Revised Self-Leadership Questionnire) (, 2009),

(,, 2010) 2.. 1) 대학생리더십일반연구,,., 1 (, 2009), 3 (,, 2012;,, 2008;, 2010). 1 (, 2007), 2 (,, 2006;, 2013). 2) 대학생리더십교육개선관련연구,,. 4 (, 2012;, 2006;, 2009;, 2008), 1 (, 2013). 1 (, 2011). 2 (, 2011;, 2009), 4 (, 2010;, 2008;, 2008;,, 2010). < -3>. (12 ) (4 ) (8 ) (2013) (2006); (2008); (2009); (2012) / (2011) (2011); (2008); (2008);, (2010); (2009) (2010) 3) 대학생리더십교육질관리관련연구. 1 (, 2011), 2

(, 2011;,,,, 2014). 1 (, 2013), 6 (,,,, 2005;, 2005;,,,, 2010;, 2005;, 2005). < -4>. (10 ) (2 ) (8 ) (2011) (2011);,,, (2014) (2013) (2005);,,, (2005); (2005); (2005); (2005);,,, (2010) 4) 대학생리더십의효과분석관련연구.,,., /,,, 4. / 2 (, 2011;, 2012), 2 (, 2011;,,, 2014). 3 (, 2014;, 2012;, 2013), 7 (, 2013;,, 2012;,, 2008;,, 2012;,, 2012;,, 2013;, 2013). 1 (, 2014), 3 (,, 2012;, 2013;,, 2012). 4 3 (, 2008;, 2013;, 2010) 1 (, 2008). < -5>.

(25 ) / (9 ) (2011); (2012) (2012); (2013); (2014) (2014) (2008); (2010); (2013) (13 ),,,,, (2011);,, (2014), (2008);, (2012);, (2012);, (2012);, (2013); (2013); (2013), (2012);, (2012); (2013) (2008),,, 4.,,,,,, (,, 2013;,, 2013). < -6>, < -7>. 0 4 4 14 22 36 1 2 3 3 7 10 18 35 53

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1 2 1 0 0 4 1 5 5 14 11 36 1 1 0 0 1 3 4 0 4 1 1 10 7 8 10 14 14 53 53 36, 10, 4, 3.. 2005 2006, 2007. 14, 22... (www.riss.kr) 2005 2014 10 18, 35, 53. 2,,.., 53 39.6%(21 ). 13 (24.5%), 6 (11.3%), (5, 9.4%), 4 (7.5%).,,,., 22 (41.5%), 12 (22.6%), 10 (18.9%),

7 (13.2%), 2 (3.8%).,.,., 36 (67.9%), 10 (18.9%). 2007. 4 (7.5%), 3 (5.7%)..,,,,,,.,,.,,,,.,,,..,.,., 2007,,.,,.,,,,,.

.,,.,, 2005 10 53,.,,. (2014)...,, (2008).. (2), 515-536. (2006).. (2009)... (2011)... (2012).. (4), 117-137. (2013).. (10), 369-390.,,,, (2003). :. (2010). :. (1), 239-256. (2007)... (2007).. (3), 343-369.

, (2013)., (4), 1-32. (2012).,.., (2012).,. (2), 49-71., (2008).. 35-62.,,, (2014).., 423-432.,,,,,, (2011). :. (2003). :. (2013)..., (2006).. 167-181. (2013)... (2011)... (2008)... (2009)... (2009). (1988-2008). (1), 349-378. (1994). :.,,,,, (2011). :. (1), 117-138., (2011).. (1), 701-713.,,, (2005).. 39-49. (2011).. (1), 1-20.

(2011)... (2011)... (2003)... (2006). - -., 58-74. (2009).., 19-37. (2007).. (1), 125-151. (2009). (Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire) :,. (2008). :. (3), 167-193., (2013).. (3), 431-462. (2005). :., 287-314. (2008).. 1, 27-53., (2012).. (6), 231-251. (2007).. (2), 67-84.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (2002). :., (2008). : -,, -. (7), 319-345., (2012).. (3), 45-65.,,, (2010).,,., 43-61. (2005)... (2005).. (2), 387-399.

(2013)... (2012).,..,, (2014).,,,. (6), 229-240. (2008).., 55-83., (2012).. (2), 19-39., (2013).,,,. (3), 215-245. (2013).. (4), 161-180. (2008).., 129-151. (2014)... (2010).. (2), 135-161. (2013).. (3), 161-187. (2005).. (1), 223-248., (2010). :. (6), 111-121., (2010). :. (4), 95-119. (2000)..., (2011).. 27-46., (2012). :,. (3), 65-84.

(2003)... (2005)... (2013)... (2008).,,, :. (1), 347-356. (2010)... (2009).. 125-154. (2013).,, -,,. 345-380. ( ) (2006).. :. Anderson, J. S., & Prussia, G. E. (1997). The Self-leadership Questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 4(2), 119-143. doi:10.1177/ 107179199700400212. Bligh, M. C., Pearce, C. L., & Kohles, J. C. (2006). The importance of self and shared leadership in team based knowledge work, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 296-318. doi:10.1108/ 02683940610663105. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and prsctice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611. Dolbier, C. L., Soderstorm, M., & Steinhardt. M. A. (2001). The relationship between self leadership and enhanced psychological, health, and work outcomes. Journal of Psychology, 135(5), 469-485. doi:10.1080/00223980109603713. Eich, D. (2008). A grounded theory of high-quality leadership programs: Perspectives from student leadership development programs in higher education. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(2), 176-187. doi:10.1177/1548051808324099. Goleman, D., Boyatzis R., & McKee, A. (2002). The Primal Leadership. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The Servant as Leader: Indianapolis, IN: the Robert, K. Greenleaf Center. Hartley, J., & Hinksman, B. (2003). Leadership Development: A Systematic Review of the Literature, London: NHS Leadership Centre.

Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical fadtor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691. doi:10.1108/02683940210450484. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765-780. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765. Kan, D. B., & Reichard. R. J. (2009). Student selection criteria in undergraduate leadership education programs. Educational Considerations, 37(1), 56-58. Lee, O., & Yarger, S. J. (1996). Modes of inquiry in research on teacher education. in Sikula, J., Buttery, T. J. & Guyton, E.(eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd ed.). NY: Macmillan Publishing Company, 14-37. Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A century's quest to understand school leadership. In Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (Eds). Handbook of Research on Educational Administration (2nd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 45-72. Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-Leadership toward an Expanded Theory of Self-Influence Process in Organization. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585-600. doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4306232. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1996). Thought self-leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee behavior, cognition, and emotion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(5), 445-467. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199609)17:5<445::aid-job770>3.0.co;2-n. Neubert, M. J., & Wu, J. C. (2006). An investigation of the generalizability of the Houghton and Neck Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire to a Chinese context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 360-373. doi:10.1108/02683940610663132. Thurston, L. P., & Middendorf, B. J. (2009). Evaluating department chair and student leadership in higher education. Educational Considerations, 37(1), 11-18. : 2016.02.25 / : 2016.03.08 / : 2016.3.23

: 2005 2014 10. :, (, ) 53.,, (,,, ). :,,. :,,.