Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.423-441 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.29.1.201903.423 An Exploratory Study on the Improvement of Democratic Consultative Culture in Schools Purpose: The purpose of the study was to present the way to improve Democratic Consultative Culture in School by diagnosing it. Method: Qualitative Research was conducted on surveys of teachers of elementary, middle, and high schools in Busan Metropolitan Office of Education. Focus group interview(fgi) was also implemented to deduce improvement for Democratic Consultative Culture in School. The focus of the five approaches was the formation and sharing of democratic value system, the formation of a horizontal relationship and a democratic communication in schools, the establishment a democratic decision-making system in schools, the continuing operation of Democratic Consultative Culture in schools, the support of the Office of Education's democratic consultative culture. Results: As a hindrance factor of Democratic Consultative Culture in School, first, the basic direction of school education was set with the directives of higher-level institutions and the management philosophy of managers. Second, the meeting of small groups was centered on the delivery of work. Third, it was insufficient space and time, operating rules for the revitalization of a teachers' council. Fourth, it was the vertical school culture and obscure perception of the democratic leadership and role of managers. Fifth, the task was centered on reporting performance of Education Office. Conclusion: In the analysis results, we suggested the improvement of Democratic Consultative Culture of teachers in schools. Key words : Democratic, School Culture, Consultative Culture, Qualitative Research Corresponding Author: Kim, Suk-Woo. Pusan National University, Dept. of Education, Busandaehakro, Jangjeondong, Busan, Korea, e-mail: swkim@pusan.ac.kr
. 4.,.,. 2008 4.,. (, 2005). 5 2,...,.,,,,....,,,, (,, 2015)...,, (, 2016).,,. (Hargreaves & Fullan, 2014).. 4
2015 2014 9, 2017. 2015, 2018 8..,,. -., (action research)..., (,,, 2018;, 2005;, 2000)., (,,,, 2016;, 2016;, 2016...,,,...,.,.
.. (Schein, 1992). (, 2014),., (Owens, 2001).,,,,.,,. (2014). ( ).,, (2006).,.,,,, (2016).,., (Hoy & Miskel, 2013).,,.,,
., (, 2007).,,., (2006), (2000),,,,,,., (,, 2011)..,,,,, (,,,, 2016)..?.,, (, 2018)..,..,,, (),.,., (Maxwell & Thomas, 1991).,, (, 2015). (, 2014).
.. 17.,. 2 1 6 FGI(Focus Group Interview). 1) 설문조사, (, 2003;, 2003) 7 (,,,,,, ) 3., (, ), (, ), ( ).,,,, 5 7. < -1>.
.. 1. 2. 3. 6 7~13 14~25 26 4. 5. 6. 1~5 6~10 11~15 16~20 21~25 26 1.?? 2. 3. 4. 5.??????, 2018 10 1 10 25 25., 643 ( 363, 174, 106 ). < -2>. 292 138 96 526(81.8%) 71 36 10 117(18.2%) 6 19 13 1 33(5.1%) 7~13 90 53 8 151(23.5%) 14~25 132 94 52 278(43.2%) 26 122 14 45 181(28.2)
( ) 119 62 73 254(39.5%) 244 112 33 389(60.5%) 25 11 17 53(8.2%) 38 28 29 95(14.8%) 2 1 0 3(0.5%) 146 82 25 253((39.3%) 152 52 35 239((37.2%) 1~5 34 15 7 56(8.7%) 6~10 24 12 6 42(6.5%) 11~15 32 7 5 44(6.8%) 16~20 73 21 15 109(17%) 21~25 39 16 9 64(10%) 26 161 103 64 328(51%) 363 174 106 643(100%), 5 7,. 2) 심층면담,. 2 1 6. < -3>. 1 K 22 2 J 14 3 Y 20 4 B 27 5 M 23 6 B 25, 2018 10 10 10 31 3 1 30 40
.,,.,,.., 5. Stewart(2007),, 1 5, 1. < -4>.,..???? ()?,.., 643 ( 363, 174, 106 ) 5 7. < -1>.
??,, 1 (2),,,,,...???,,,,, /., (/),.. 50% 100% 100%
( )??,,..,.,,,?, 1) 민주적가치체계형성과공유....(K )..(Y )...(B ).
..(M ).,.. 2) 학교내수평적관계맺기와민주적소통...(K )!,,.(M ).,.(B ).,. 3) 학교내민주적의사결정체제구축.
,.,.(J ) 5 2 4 30.,.(Y ) 2 4, 1 3...,.(B ),,.,. 4) 학교내민주적협의문화의지속운영..,...(K ).....(B )...(M )
.,. 5) 교육청의민주적협의문화지원체계..,.(J ),.(Y ).,.(M ).......
,..,.,.,!...,,...,...,... 4,, -... -,.
., 17 6 6,.,.,,.., (2006).. (1), 397-419. (2018). :. (2018). :. (2018). :. (2008). https://www.moe.go.kr/boardcnts/filedown.do?m=040103&s=moe&fileseq=4ef96af28a33a7928fac5621 487e2762 2018.12.24. (2014). 2015. http://www.moe.go.kr/agenda/mainpolicy/attach/2015_moe_1.hwp 2018.12.24. (2018). http://jinhak.use.go.kr/board_on/download.php?id=menu3_01&no=262&gubun=1 2018.12.24.,,, (2016).. (6), 87-113., (2015).. (4), 255-284. (2007). :. (3), 41-63.,, (2018).. (1), 399-417. (2000).. 139-172.
(2014), :.,,,,,, (2016).. (2005),. (2), 133-155. (2018). :. (2018). :. (2003),. (3), 349-375.,,, (2016),. (4), 139-162. (2016).. (1), 297-328., (2006),. 1-32. (2016). :. (1), 259-281.,,, (2016).. (4), 89-115. (2018)..., (2011). :. (1), 311-333. (2018). :. (2003). :. (1), 301-320. (2018). :. (2000).. (2), 184-207. (2015). :. Andy & Fullan.(2016). (2014). :. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Maxwell, T. M., & Thomas, R. A. (1991). School Climate and School Culture. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(2), 72-82.
Owens, R. G. (2001). Organizational behavior in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Fancisco: Jossey-Bass Publishes. Stewart, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: theory and practice. Second Edition. Sage Publications. : 2019.01.31. / : 2019.02.07. / : 2019.03.20.
:. :.,,,, 5. :,,.,.,,.,.,. :.