Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * An Analysis of Diffe

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: * A Study on the Re

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of


(5차 편집).hwp

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )


歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac


ePapyrus PDF Document

,......


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

2012북가이드-최종교

1..

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>



Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: The Exploratory Stu

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationships a

<C1DF3320BCF6BEF7B0E8C8B9BCAD2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : * A Study on Appl

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.1-22 DOI: * An Analysis of the Ext

44-4대지.07이영희532~

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

<BFCFBCBA30362DC0B1BFECC3B62E687770>

,......

<BFA9BAD02DB0A1BBF3B1A4B0ED28C0CCBCF6B9FC2920B3BBC1F62E706466>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: (Problem-Based Lear

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.55-76 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.1.201803.55 * An Analysis of Differences and Influencing Factors of College Students' Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions Based on Their Individual Backgrounds Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences and influencing factors of college students' critical thinking skills and dispositions depending on their individual backgrounds. Method: The sample included 227 college students (second year - fourth year) at A university in Seoul. The instruments used in this study were A university critical thinking skill test and KRIVET's comprehensive thinking function test. The data were analyzed using MANOVA and hierarchical multiple regression that adds GPA to individual background variables. Results: The results of this study were as follows: First, there were significant gender differences. Second, there was no significant difference based on students' GPA and admission types. Third, there were some differences in the within-subject effect of majority fields. Conclusion: The results of the analysis indicated that female students perceived lower levels of self-efficacy for critical thinking compared to their real critical thinking skills. In addition, the individual background variable has an effect on critical thinking dispositions., while on the other hand, the credit of the previous semester has an effect on critical thinking skills. The detailed results of the study were elaborated in the main text, and related academic and policy implications were discussed. Key words : critical thinking disposition, critical thinking skills or ability, individual backgrounds * 3 K-CESA. Corresponding Author: Park, Ji-Hoe. Sungkyunkwan University, Dept. of Education, Sungkyunkwan-ro, Joungno-gu, Seoul, Korea, e-mail: jihoe27@naver.com

..., (,, 2009)., (learning) (Bowen, 1996).,,,. (knowledge), (characteristics), (behavior)., 4,. (World Economic Forum, 2016),,,,,,,,, 4. (Bloom, Englehart, Furst, Hill, & Krathwohl, 1956),,..., OECD AHELO(Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes) CLA(Collegiate Learning Assessment), GSA(Graduate Student Assessment) (, 2015). K-CESA,,. K-CESA, (,, 2017). (ability or skills) (disposition) (, 2006; Facione, 1990),

(self-reported)., (,,,,, 2015). (, 2011)... (between-college effects) (within-college effects) (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005).,,,, (, 2016). (,,,,,,, ).., (Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006).,,,, (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005).,,,,, (Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006).,,, (,, 2014),,,,,,, (,,, 2014)..,.. 1:? 2:?

..,, (Ennis, 1989), (Facione, 1990). (,, 2017). (, 2009;,, 2015;,,,, 2009; Facione, Facione, & Sanchez, 1994; Profetto-McGrath, 2003), (,, 2006;,,, 2005). (critical thinking), (, 2005; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005)., Gagne(1988),, Swarts(1987, 1991), Swarts Parks(1999), (, 2005)., (critical performance) (Ennis, 1987; Facione, Sanchez, Facione, & Gainen, 1995; Perkins, Jay, & Tishman, 1993). Ennis(1987), Siegel(1988, 1991),,,.,,.

, (Profetto-McGrath, 2003),.,...,..,.,,. Kuh, Bridges, Hayek(2006),. (pre-college experiences), (student engagement), (post-college outcomes).. -,, (,, 2003;,,, 2011;,, 2009)., (Terenzini, Springer, Pascarella, & Nora, 1995). (enrollment choice), (academic preparation), (aptitude & college readiness),,

(Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006).,,,,,, (, 2015)., (,, 2006;, 2005; Pascarela & Terenzini, 2005) (,, 2015; Profetto-McGrath, 2003). (,, 2006) (Rodzalan & Saat, 2015), (, 2005). (Farley & Elmore, 1992; McMillan, 1987; Wilson, 1989), (,, 2015). (Li, Long, & Simpson, 1998; Money, 1997) (Gadzella & Masten, 1998).,. (quality of student effort) (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005). (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005),, (Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006).,,,,,,,, (,, 2014;,,, 2014). ( ) (2016),..,.

. (net-effects)..,.,,,,, (,, 2006;, 2005; Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005; Terenzini, Springer, Pascarella, & Nora, 1995). (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005), (Astin, 1999), (Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006).,, < III-1>. A 2~4, 2.

1 2016 6 20 8 4, 2 K-CESA 9 20 10 10. 318,,, 91 227. 227. 124 (54.6%), 103 (45.4%). 2 43 (18.9%), 3 116 (51.1%), 4 68 (30.0%). 123 (54.2%), 104 (45.8%)., 105 (46.3%), 30 (13.2%), 92 (40.5%). 1) 227 100.0 124 54.6 103 45.4 2 43 18.9 3 116 51.1 4 68 30.0 123 104 105 30 92 54.2 45.8 46.3 13.2 40.5 2017,.,. 1) < 1>.

,,, (,, 2017)..,. 1) 비판적사고성향 A (self-reported) (,,,,, 2015;,,,, 2015;,,, 2015a, 2015b). 30 9, 9, 7, 5, 5 ( 1 5 )..778( :.781),.781( :.788),.775( :.775),.732( :.733). (30 ).922 ( :.924). 2) 비판적사고기능 K-CESA. K-CESA,,., (, 2016). K-CESA 4 (4 45 ). (ability or skills),,,, 4. K-CESA 2, 8. 2, (,,, 2011). K-CESA.954 2). 2),..

IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0. 1,,,, (MANOVA). 2 (GPA) (multiple regression analysis). Box s M, Levene. (multicollinearity) Durbin-Watson, VIF.. 1) 성별에따른차이분석 1..,,,.,.. (Shaizatul & Maisarah, 2015), (2005).

* (K-CESA ) p<.10, ** p<.05 (n=124) (n=103) M(SD) M(SD) (df) 3.94(0.45) 3.81(.049) 3.913(1) **.017 3.95(0.45) 3.75(0.49) 9.434(1) **.040 3.89(0.47) 3.76(0.52) 3.811(1) *.017 3.91(0.50) 3.82(0.54) 1.581(1).007 =.955 =2.585 * 1.16(0.44) 1.26(0.41) 3.034(1) *.013 1.42(0.39) 1.46(0.32).524(1).002 1.22(0.44) 1.21(0.40).071(1).000 1.22(0.37) 1.29(0.30) 1.996(1).009 =.977 =1.282 2) 전공계열에따른차이분석 1..,.. Shaizatul & Maisarah(2015).. Pascarella & Terenzini(2005). (n=123) (n=104) M(SD) M(SD) (df) 3.85(0.56) 3.90(.042).606(1).003 3.83(0.56) 3.90(0.44).840(1).004 3.80(0.56) 3.87(0.50).880(1).004 3.88(0.59) 3.85(0.52).094(1).000 =.985 =.848

( ) (K-CESA ) ** p<.05 (n=123) (n=104) M(SD) M(SD) (df) 1.23(0.46) 1.18(0.40).076(1).003 1.47(0.36) 1.40(0.35) 1.955(1).009 1.28(0.44) 1.15(0.40) 5.383(1) **.023 1.25(0.37) 1.25(0.30).004(1).000 =.967 =1.919 3) 비판적사고성향과사고기능에대한학년에따른차이분석 1.,. 4,. (,, 2015; Profetto-McGrath, 2003). 2 (n=43) 3 (n=116) 4 (n=68) M(SD) M(SD) M(SD) (df) 3.88(0.51) 3.87(0.49) 3.88(0.53).005(2).000 3.88(0.51) 3.89(0.51) 3.78(0.50) 1.073(2).009 3.90(0.54) 3.82(0.53) 3.80(0.53).535(2).005 3.81(0.57) 3.89(0.55) 3.85(0.56).401(2).004 =.958 =1.199 1.13(0.35) 1.25(0.44) 1.17(0.46).266(2).012 1.38(0.35) 1.43(0.36) 1.47(0.36).127(2).009 (K-CESA 1.20(0.39) 1.26(0.41) 1.16(0.47).138(2).007 ) 1.20(0.30) 1.25(0.35) 1.28(0.35).091(2).007 =.952 =1.379 4) 비판적사고성향과사고기능에대한입학유형에따른차이 1..,,

. (2016). (Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006). (K-CESA ) (n=105) (n=30) (n=92) (df) M(SD) M(SD) M(SD) 3.80(0.50) 3.91(0.43) 3.95(0.52) 2.129(2).019 3.79(0.53) 3.90(0.42) 3.92(0.50) 1.866(2).016 3.79(0.54) 3.92(0.50) 3.85(0.53).649(2).006 3.79(0.56) 3.86(0.51) 3.94(0.54) 2.008(2).018 =.965 =.993 1.20(0.42) 1.30(0.47) 1.18(0.44).908(2).008 1.41(0.35) 1.52(0.38) 1.43(0.36).963(2).009 1.22(0.42) 1.31(0.45) 1.19(0.42).918(2).008 1.25(0.34) 1.30(0.40) 1.23(0.35).503(2).004 =.983 =.483 2.. =0, =1 =0, =1 : =0, =1 =0, =1 : 2 =2, 3 =3, 4 =4 GPA 4.5 8

. * 1.253 0.064 0.043 0.064 3.016 **.154 0.024 0.002 0.024 1.076 2.255 0.065 0.039 0.001 0.239 **.225 0.051 0.025 0.027 6.248 * p<.10, ** p<.05,..,, GPA. 1, GPA GPA 95%. (, 2005; Farley & Elmore, 1992; McMillan, 1987; Wilson, 1989). * 1 2 1 2 β β β β ( ) 4.024 3.915 1.310 0.913-0.185 ** -0.182 ** -0.191 ** -0.188 ** 0.015 0.021-0.006-0.008 0.072 0.071 0.076 0.075-0.066-0.093-0.051-0.072 0.168 0.113 0.175 0.118 0.080 0.076 0.107 0.102 0.124 * 0.121 * 0.121 * 0.118 * 0.004 0.005-0.008-0.010-0.060-0.083-0.058-0.080 0.044 0.085 0.052 0.100 GPA 0.031 0.033 0.112 ** 0.171 ** p<.10, ** p<.05

. (,, 2017). A 2~4, 227. 1 (MANOVA),.,,. (), ( ), ( ).. Shaizatul Maisarah(2015) (2005), (2006). (2005), (2006) Cornell Critical Thinking Test Level X, (2005), (2006). (2006),,,..,,.,. Shaizatul Maisarah(2015).,. (2005)...,

(2005).,,.. (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005),. (2015). (Doyle, Edison, & Pascarella, 1998; Pascarella, Bohr, Nora, & Terenzini, 1996) (Grayson, 1996; Whitmire & Lawrence, 1996).,.,..,,.,. (Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006), (2016).,. 2 (Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005), (Astin, 1999), (Kuh, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006)..,.. (, 2005; Farley

& Elmore, 1992; McMillan, 1987; Wilson, 1989),.,,, Bloom, Englehart, Furst, Hill, Krathwohl(1956),,.,,,........,..,,., (2006).. (3), 1-25., (2014). :

. (3), 177-207.,,,,, (2009). : (09-R19-3). :. (2006).. (1), 89-117., (2003).. (1), 367-392. (2016).,,.., (2017).. (3), 137-158. (2011). H. Siegel. 271-292. (2015). -AHELO. (3), 109-131.,, (2005).. (2), 382-389.,, (2015a). KU. :.,, (2015b). KU 2. :., (2015).. (6), 197-203.,, (2011).. (4), 319-337.,, (2014). 69 KEDI. 25-54. :.,,,, (2015). :.,,, (2015). :.,,, (2009). II :. :.,, (2011)..

(4), 461-486., (2009). :. (1), 199-222. (2016). ( ) 2016 K-CESA. :. (2005).. (2), 240-251. Astin, A. W. (1999). Student Involvement: A Development Theory for Higher Education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green. Bowen, H. R. (1996). Investment in learning: The individual and social value of American higher education. NJ: Transaction Publishers. Doyle, S., Edison, M., & Pascarella, E. (1998, November). The seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education as process indicators of cognitive development in college: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami. Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B.Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9 26). New York: Freeman & Co.. Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10. Facione, N. C., Facione, P. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (1994). Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 33(8), 345-350. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Millbrae, CA: California Academic. Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. The Journal of General Education, 44, 1-25. Farley, M. J., & Elmore, P. B. (1992). The relationship of reading comprehension to critical thinking skills, cognitive ability, and vocabulary for a sample of underachieving college freshmen. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 921-931. Gadzella, B. M., & Masten, W. G. (1998). Critical thinking and learning processes for students in two

major fields. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25(4), 256-261. Gagne, R. M. (1988). Mastery learning and instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1(1), 7-18. Grayson, J. (1996). Value added in generic skills between first and final year: A pilot project(research report). Toronto: York University, Institute for Social Research. Kuh, G. D., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What Matters to Student Success? A Review of the Literature, NPEC. Li, G., Long, S., & Simpson, M. (1998). Self-perceives gains in communication and critical thinking skills: Are there disciplinary differences? Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Minneapolis, MN. McMillan, J. H. (1987). Enhancing college students' critical thinking: A review of studies. Research in higher education, 26(1), 3-29. Money, S. (1997). The relationship between critical thinking scores, achievement scores, and grade point average in three different disciplines. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 3401A. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students(vol. 2): A third dacade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 1-21. Profetto-McGrath, J. (2003). The relationship of critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of advanced nursing, 43(6), 569-577. Rodzalan, S. A., & Saat, M. M. (2015). The Perception of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill among Malaysian Undergraduate Students. Procedia: social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 725-732. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.425. Shaizatul, A. R., & Maisarah, M. S. (2015). The Perception of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skill among Malaysian Undergraduate Students [Electronic version]. Procedia-Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 725-732. Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason. NY : Routledge. Siegel, H. (1991). The generalizability of critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 23(1), 18-30. Swartz, R. J. (1987). Teaching for thinking: A development model for the infusion of thinking skill into mainstream instruction. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skill: Theory and practice (pp.106-126). NY: W. H. Freeman and Co.. Swartz, R. J. (1991). Infusing the teaching of critical thinking into content instruction. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (pp.177-184). Association for

Supervision and Curriculum Development. Swartz, R. J. & Parks, S. (1999). Teaching of critical and creative thinking in language arts: Infusion lessons. Critical Thinking Books & Software. Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1995). Influences affecting the development of students' critical thinking skills. Research in higher education, 36(1), 23-39. Wilson, K. D. (1989). Predictors of proficiency in critical thinking for college freshmen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. World Economic Forum (2016). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. Colony/Geneva: World Economic Forum. : 2018.01.31. / : 2018.02.12. / : 2018.03.20.

:. : A 2~4 227 A, K-CESA. (multivariate analysis of variance) (multiple regression). :,.,. :...