Similar documents
13.12 ①초점

< FB4EBB1B8BDC320BAB8B0C7BAB9C1F6C5EBB0E8BFACBAB820B9DFB0A320BFACB1B85FBEF6B1E2BAB92E687770>

정책포럼 140호 최종[1].hwp

<BAA3C6AEB3B2C1F6BFF8BBE7BEF72DB1E8B3ADBFB52DC1FD2E687770>

<5BB9E8C0E7B4EBC7D0B1B35DBFACB1B8BAB8B0EDBCAD2DC3D6C1BEC3E2B7C22E687770>

10071珥덉젏11?섏젙

인구정책의 현황과 과제 (4) 수 있다. 과거 서구에서 전염병, 기근, 전쟁 등으로 인하여 대량으로 사망자가 발생하였던 시기 직후 에 사망을 조절하는 정책도 인구조정정책의 중요 한 영역을 차지하였으나 최근 보건의료발달 등에 따라 평균수명이 지속적으로 증가하고 있는 상황

15_3oracle

<C7A5C1D8BFF8B0ED20BCF6BDC328C3D6C1BEBABB292E687770>

歯표지.PDF

(......).hwp

< D B1B9B9AE20BFACB0A3BAB8B0EDBCAD2DC3D6C1BEBCF6C1A4BFE4C3BB2E687770>

기업은행현황-표지-5도

요 약 문 1. 제목 : 개인정보 오남용 유출 2차 피해 최소화 방안 2. 연구의 배경 개인정보란 살아 있는 개인에 관한 정보로서 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보로 해당 정보만으로는 특정 개인을 알아볼 수 없더라도 다른 정보와 쉽게 결합하여 알아볼 수 있는 것을 포함한다.

시안


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review


<5BC0AFBEC6B1E2C7E0BAB9B0A85D20C0CEBCE2BFEB20C3D6C1BEBABB5F F312E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

<BFACB1B8BAB8B0ED D313120B9CEB0A3BACEB9AE20C1F6C0DAC3BCC0C720BACFC7D120BBEAB8B2BAB9B1B8C1F6BFF820C8B0BCBAC8AD20B9E6BEC820BFACB1B85FB3BBC1F62E687770>

Microsoft PowerPoint - 3.공영DBM_최동욱_본부장-중소기업의_실용주의_CRM

2015_11_이슈브리프.indd

<B0ADB9AE5F33B1C75F30315FC0CEBCE232C2F728B9DAC1D6BEF0295F FB3AAB4AEC5EBB0E85FB0B3BCB1B9E6BEC85FC3D6C1BEBAB8B0EDBCAD28C3D6C1BE295FC3D6C1BE E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

범죄통계 DB 구축사업(Ⅹ).hwp

노인의학 PDF


<C0E5BED6C7D0BBFD20B0A1C1B7C2FCBFA920B1B9BFDCC3BCC7E8BFACBCF6BAB8B0EDBCAD2E687770>

2017 1

13.11 ①초점

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

한국관광공사 사장 귀하 본 보고서를 한방의료관광 활성화를 위한 규제 개혁에 관한 연구 결과 보고서로 제출합니다 2014년 6월 경희사이버대학교 조인원

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

ePapyrus PDF Document

코이카 연보

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

¹Ì·¡¼¼´ë¿ÍÀǵ¿Çà-Ç¥Áö ¾ÕµÞ¸é ÇÕº» ¿Ï¼º.PDF

웹진용

Day 1 : 2016년 6월 24일(금) 시 간 프로그램 장 소 10:00-13:00 preconference : 연구방법론 workshop 영역 주제 강연자 양적연구 교육학연구에서 메타분석의 적용과 최근 연구동향 신인수(전주대) 사도관 327 질적연구 질적 연구자

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af


한국의 성장과 사회통합을 위한 틀 서문 2 한국에게 사회통합이 최우선 과제인 이유는? 3 첫째, 지속 가능한 성장은 사회통합을 달성하는 데 필수이다. 3 사회화 (go social) 정책도 그만큼 중요하다. 5 사회지출 증대 6 증가하는 사회지출의 재원을 마련할 방법은

청소년 위기, 함께 나서야 합니다 작년부터 여성가족위원회 활동을 하며 우리 사회 문제 중 위기 청소년에 대한 문 제가 심각함을 느끼고 이 문제에 대한 종합적 대책이 필요하다는 생각을 하게 되었 습니다. 청소년을 보호하고 성장시키는데 있어서 가정에서 담당하던 청소년 교육

kdi 연중기획 홍릉을 떠나며 청량리의 유래 06 kdi special 공 감 special 1 이퀼리브리엄에 대한 상념 16 special 2 해후, 아이와 어른이 만나는 순간 20 special 3 Living Library of KDI(LLK) 24 special

歯CRM개괄_허순영.PDF

<BCADBFEFBDC3BFA9BCBAB0A1C1B7C0E7B4DC2D B3E220BFA9BCBAC1D6B0A320B1E2B3E4C5E4B7D0C8B82E687770>

다문화 가정의 부모

<303220BDC9C6F7C1F6BFF25FC0CFC0DAB8AEC0A7B1E2C7D8B9FDC0BBC3A3C0DA FB1E2C1B6B0ADBFACB1B3C3BC292E687770>

사회동향1-최종

,,,,,,, ,, 2 3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (2001) 2

Contents I II Project Overview 상황분석 및 여건진단 II-1 문화재청 정책 및 사업 분석 II-2 II-3 문화재청 정책 커뮤니케이션 분석 문화재청 일반인식 분석 III 조직분석 및 사례 연구 III-1 문화재청 홍보 조직 및 예산 분석 III

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

< e-business 전략 계획 이슈와 사례 >

환경교육종합계획수립을위한 기초연구

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

코이카 개발정책 포커스 3호.0714.indd

국경의 비전 작업 년대 들어 직면하게 된 국경의 새로운 비전을 모색하기 위 KDI의 노력들 김 주 훈* Main Research Publications 2011 비전과 과: 열린 세상, 유연 경 경사회여건 변와 재정의 역할 재벌개혁의 정책과와 방향 북경 발전

Contents Lotte Focus Lotte Life


< B1B9C1A6B1E2B1B82D594ABFCFB7E12E687770>

<5BC6EDC1FD5D20C2F7B1E2C1A4BACE20BFA9BCBAC1A4C3A B4EB20B0FAC1A62E687770>

BSC Discussion 1

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

< FC3BBBCD2B3E2C1A4C3A5C0C720C8AEC0E5B0FA20B9DFC0FC28C3D6C1BE31292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

4) 종교 및 문화 몽골인의 주된 종교는 티베트 불교로 역사적으로는 티베트와의 관계가 깊다. 하지만 1992 년 선거로 민주화된 이후 개신교가 선교사들에 의해 유입되고 있으며, 그 이전부터 러시아 의 영향으로 정교회 신자들이 존재하고 있었다. 불교 50%, 이슬람교 4

¾Ö´º¾ó¸®Æ÷Æ®(2010)1.ps


歯4차학술대회원고(황수경이상호).PDF

인문사회과학기술융합학회

<5B31362E30332E31315D20C5EBC7D5B0C7B0ADC1F5C1F8BBE7BEF720BEC8B3BB2DB1DDBFAC2E687770>

EU

264 축되어 있으나, 과거의 경우 결측치가 있거나 폐기물 발생 량 집계방법이 용적기준에서 중량기준으로 변경되어 자료 를 활용하는데 제한이 있었다. 또한 1995년부터 쓰레기 종 량제가 도입되어 생활폐기물 발생량이 이를 기점으로 크 게 줄어들었다. 그러므로 1996년부

사회동향1-2장

별을 닮은 대학 별을 담은 대학 KYUNGSUNG UNIVERSITY 학생 중심의 맞춤형 진로설계, 취업&창업 프로그램 복수학위부터 해외 인턴십까지, 글로벌 네트워크 세상을 움직이는 경성인, 동문 파워 교육 패러다임의 진화, 교육 학생지원 프로그램

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

제 출 문 문화체육관광부장관 귀하 본 보고서를 문화예술분야 통계 생산 및 관리 방안 연구결과 최종 보고서로 제출합니다. 2010년 10월 숙명여자대학교 산학협력단 본 보고서는 문화체육관광부의 공식적인 견해와 다를 수 있습니다

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

< B3E220C0CCBDB4C6E4C0CCC6DB2DB9E8B0E6C8AD28C3D6C1BEBCF6C1A4BABB E687770>

CTS사보-2월


afoco백서-내지.indd

歯목차45호.PDF

애경은 사랑과 존경의 마음으로 변하지 않는 가치를 만들어 갑니다 우리는 지난 60여 년의 역사를 자양분으로 어떤 외풍에도 흔들리지 않을 단단한 뿌리를 내렸습니다. 때로는 곧게, 때로는 넓게 뻗어낸 뿌리는 그만큼 굳건한 줄기를 길러냈습니다. 매년 풍성한 과실을 얻을 수

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

제1부(1장~3장)11~47ok :9 PM 페이지12 문화비전의 수립목적과 성격 문화비전의 수립배경과 목적 1 비전은 함께 도달하고자 하는 미래의 설계도 비전이란 우리 사회의 구성원이 함께 도달하고자 하는 미래의 상이다. 개인적 차원의 바 람이나

08_¹Úö¼øöKš

현 안 분 석 2 Catsouphes & Smyer, 2006). 우리나라도 숙련된 인 력부족에 대한 우려가 심화되고 있으며, 일자리의 미 스매치 수준이 해외 주요국보다 심각하다는 점도 지 지부진한 유연근무제의 확산을 위한 진정성 있는 노 력이 필요하다는 점을 보여준다

<BCBCB9CCB3AA E32392E687770>

1

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

<BFACB1B8BFF82031C1D6B3E2B1E2B3E4C0DAB7E1C1FD28C6EDC1FDBCF6C1A4292E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

<3036C0CCBCB1BFEC2E687770>

< D31302D B3E2B5B520C1A4BACE20BCBAB0FAB0E8C8B920C6F2B0A15FB4D9BACEC3B35F DC3D6C1BE2E687770>

hwp

jung, pack, song, kim, and Yi , , , OECD 1.30 (Statistics Korea, 2015a).,,., , 2006 (Ministry of Health

응답하라, 메가스터디 재수를 말한다. Ⅰ. 재수 大 해부 예전에 재수생이라고 하면 성적이 좋지 않아 대학입시에 실패한 학생 이라는 인식이 지배 적이었다. 하지만 최근에는 재수를 목표를 향한 재도전 이라고 긍정적으로 평가하는 경 향이 뚜렷해졌다. 때문에 대학

Transcription:

Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ 1 Ⅰ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 Ⅳ 2 Ⅲ - 4 -

3 Ⅱ 4 5 6 7 1 2 Ⅲ 1 Ⅱ 1 2 1

1 Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ

() (Ⅰ) : 4 (Korean Child Friendly City, KCFC) OECD TALIS - OECD TALIS Starting Strong Survey 2018-3 -

- 4 -

- 5 -

8,364,535 8,236,119 7,952,768 283,351 3.4% 6,819,416 6,779,000 6,770,000 9,000 0.1% 6,819,416 6,779,000 6,770,000 9,000 0.1% 2,470,847 2,687,842 2,758,000 70,158 2.6% 2,304,789 2,385,562 2,533,000 147,438 6.2% 166,058 302,280 225,000 77,280 25.6% - - - - - 443,515 404,099 404,000 99 0.1% 1,307,054 1,245,059 1,245,000 59 0.1% 1,956,000 1,800,000 1,721,000 79,000 4.4% 642,000 642,000 642,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,545,119 1,457,119 1,182,768 274,351 18.8% 1,501,000 1,413,000 1,161,000 252,000 17.8% - - - - - 39,119 39,119 16,768 22,351 57.1% 5,000 5,000 5,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8,364,535 8,236,119 7,952,768 283,351 3.4% 2,995,668 3,231,032 3,315,000 83,968 2.6% 4,216,352 3,891,988 3,531,768 360,220 9.3% 443,515 404,000 404,000 - - 709,000 702,000 702,000 - - - - - - - - 6 -

8,364,535 8,236,119 7,952,768 283,351 2,995,668 3,231,032 3,315,000 83,968 4,216,352 3,891,988 3,531,768 360,220 1,307,054 1,245,059 1,245,000 59 1,072,148 1,010,153 1,010,000 153 133,000 133,000 133,000-140,000 140,000 140,000-94,906 94,906 95,000 94 1,956,000 1,800,000 1,721,000 79,000 - ( 11-16) 90,000 - - - - -3~5 ( 12-17) 383,500 350,000-350,000 -, ( 13-17) 107,000 110,000-110,000 - ( 13-17) 108,200 80,000-80,000 - ( 15-19) 89,300 80,000 70,000 10,000 - - ( 16-18) 100,000 90,000 79,000 11,000 - - ( 16-20) 200,000 150,000-150,000 - KICCE( 17-21) - 120,000 100,000 20,000 - -2018~2022 ( 18-22) - - 100,000 100,000 - ( 18-22) - - 300,000 300,000 - ( 18-21) - - 60,000 60,000 - - - 100,000 100,000 - ( 15~17) 188,000 160,000-160,000-7 -

- ( 18-20) - - 80,000 80,000 - - - 160,000 160,000 (( 16-20) - (Ⅱ)( 16~27) 500,000 500,000 512,000 12,000 - () 110,000 110,000 110,000 - -() 50,000 50,000 50,000 - -() 30,000 - - - 953,298 846,929 565,768 281,161 443,515 404,099 404,000 99 709,000 709,000 702,000 7,000-8 -

Ⅰ Ⅰ

. ( 2) -. -. ( ) ( 4) - - - - - - - 1,,,. -,. -,. -,,,,. - 13 -

- 2013 1.19 OECD, 2010 11% 2050 38%. -,. - 1, 2. -,,. -,. -. -,. - ( Perry Preschool Project, 2003; EPPE Project, 2007). -. - ECEC(Early Childhood Education and Care),,,. - OECD ECEC. - ECEC,,. - 14 -

- ( Perry Preschool Project, 2003; EPPE Project, 2007). -. - ECEC(Early Childhood Education and Care),,,. - OECD ECEC. - ECEC,,., 3-5....., - 15 -

..,,...,. Hub Hub - 16 -

1. --()- 1-4. 14. (),..,.,,,,,, ( ) 17 3 *, ** * ( ㆍ ㆍ ) ㆍ () **,, 2. 2-1. 17. () ㅇ ( ),, 22 34 ㅇ () - 17 -

-,, -, ( ) - ㆍ 2-4. 4 33., ICT 4 () ㅇ ( ) AI, ㆍ, 3. 3-1. 42. () ㅇ ( ) 18 0~5 10, 17 (30, 3) - 18 ㆍ () 25 43., () ㅇ ( ) 17 43.7 22 80, 20 40 ( ) 44. () ㅇ ( ) - 17 15 5%, 45. () ㅇ ( ) 22,, ㆍ 3-2. 48. () ㅇ ( ㆍ ) 22 30%, 17, ㅇ ( ㆍ ) 18 (0~5, 10), 22 40% ㅇ (- ) 17 3 2, 18 (10to4 ) ㅇ ( ) ㅇ ( ),, - 18 -

- 17-49. () ( ) 18, ㆍ ( 17 25% 22 40%) ㅇ ( ) ㆍ ㆍ - ( 18),, ( ㆍ ) * ㆍ ㅇ ( ) - (,, ), - ㆍ ㆍ ( 17~) 50. () ㅇ ( ) ㆍ,, 51. () ㅇ ( ) ㆍ (), ( ), ㆍ * ㆍ ( 18 6 ) - ㆍ ( 18) -, ㆍ ( 17~) 53. () ㅇ ( ) ㆍ ㆍ -, 54. () ㅇ ( ㆍ ) ( 21, 1), ( 20) ㆍ ( 18~) - STEAM ㆍ ㅇ ( ) 1 OECD, ㆍ ( ㆍ ), ㅇ ( ) 18, -,,, ( 18) ㅇ ( ) 18, ( 18) -, ( 17 3~5 20 ) - 19 -

3-3. 58. () ( ), ㆍ - 19 ㆍ ㆍ 3-4. 65. () ㅇ ( ) ㆍ - * * ㆍ () ㆍ ㆍ ㅇ ( ) ㅇ ( ) - ㅇ ( ) ㆍ 3-5. 71. () ㅇ ( ㆍ ) 17 3 2, 18-10 to 4, ㆍ ㆍ 4. 4-1. 74. () ㅇ ( ) 18-76. () ㅇ ( ) 17, ( 19) ㅇ ( ) 17 ㆍ ㆍ ㆍ ( ) ㅇ ( ) ㆍ ( 17), ㅇ ( ㆍ ), ( 17) 5. 5-2. 94. () ㅇ () ㆍ - 20 -

Ⅱ,.,,,,. - 23 -

,, (KICCE ),.,,. 2018( Ⅱ) (III): : KICCE,. - 24 -

,. (Ⅰ) : OECD TALIS - OECD TALIS Starting Strong Survey 2018. 2018~2022,. (Ⅳ):,. (, ), ( ) :,, : :, - 25 -

- 26 -

- 27 -

Ⅰ..,,. (,, ) - 28 -

3,,.. - 29 -

- 30 -

Ⅲ Ⅲ

Ⅲ Ⅰ - 33 -

- 34 -

- 35 -

- 36 -

Ⅳ Ⅱ - 37 -

. Ⅲ - 38 -

. Ⅱ... - 39 -

- 40 -

Ⅳ Ⅳ

Ⅳ () (Ⅰ) : (Korean Child Friendly City, KCFC) - 43 -

2.. 809,000 70,000 79,000 100,000 100,000-44 -

300,000 60,000 100,000. 240,000 80,000 160,000... - 45 -

. - 46 -

Ⅴ Ⅴ

(1) () (Ⅰ) : 1) 2017. () 49. -,,.,,,. (, 2013)., (, 2012)., (, 2014)., (, 2014). 1) 3 연구로 2 차년에는시설, 3 차년에는프로그램중심으로추진예정임. - 53 -

(, 2014). (, 2014)., / (, 2014). (, 2013)., /.. /.., (). () - 54 -

,, - 55 -

,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,,, /, / (3) 1, 2, 3.,, : ( ) - 56 -

:, :, -,.. -,, 4.,. : : 4 :,, :,, 3 :,, - 300, 300, 300, 300 1,200 :,,,,, 100 : 2 ( 2 ) : :,, - 57 -

,,,, :, () (), :,,, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3-58 -

() (Early Childhood Education) (Preschool Teacher) (Teacher Policy) (Kindergarten) (Child Care Center - 59 -

() 78,000 13,100 700 5,150 1,310 10,408 3,132 18,800-60 -

( ) 2,200 23,200-61 -

( ) - 62 -

(2) - 63 -

, (, 2017,, 2017, 2017 1 11 ) - 64 -

-: -(): (2013) -: -FGI:,, -:,,,,, - -, -: -(): (2015) -:, - -2 : 2013 - :, - :,, - -,, - :, - -: - - -(): (2015) -: - -:, - :,,,,, -. -. -: -(1): 100,, -(2): 500, -: 1) 2), 3) -: -, - -, - - ( ) - 65 -

,, -,, - 66 -

- - - - - 67 -

2018 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 I. 16. () (public-private partnership) (child care) (governance) (care system), - 68 -

() ( ) 2,500,000 1 6 = 15,000,000 70,000 1 9 5 = 3,150,000 2,000 100 = 200,000 20,000 7 = 140,000 (, ) (8,180+101 95) 160p 1.1 = 3,128,000 282,400 10 = 2,824,0000 100,000 3 8 = 2,400,000 20,000 3 5 = 300,000 100,000 3 2 = 600,000 50,000 4 = 200,000 50,000 2 2 = 200,000 6,000 3 3 2 = 108,000 150,000 6 4 = 3,600,000 IRB 200,000 2 = 400,000-200,000 2 = 400,000-18,150 340 5,952 350 3,300 508 7,900-69 -

300,000 3 = 900,000 100,000 3 2 = 600,000 1) : 100,000 10 = 1,000,000 2) : 50,000 10 = 500,000 100,000 5 = 500,000 (, ) 25,000 6 10 = 1,500,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000-1: 35,000 500 = 17,500,000-2: 35,000 100 = 3,500,000 2,500 21,000 ( ) ( ) - 70 -

(3),.. 2017.1.1., 2019.12.31..,..,,,,. - 71 -

,,. - 72 -

, 2019.12.31., - 73 -

,,, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (1/1) 10 2018.2.1 2018.11.30-74 -

M M2 () (child care and (education (child (governance) education policy) finance) care finance) - 75 -

() 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ( ) 2,500,000 1 5 = 12,500,000 70,000 1 3 4 = 840,000 2,000 300 = 600,000 20,000 20 = 400,000 / 5,000 12 = 60,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 150 = 2,933,000 188,900 10 = 1,889,000 ( ) 500,000 1 = 500,000 450,000 1 = 450,000 1,230,000 1 = 1,230,000 PC 70,000 1 5 = 350,000 - ( ) 100,000 5 7 = 3,500,000-20,000 5 10 = 1,000,000 100,000 7 4 = 2,800,000 ( ) 50,000 4 3 = 600,000 50,000 3 2 = 300,000 6,000 3 9 4 = 648,000 ( ) 400,000 3 = 1,200,000 100,000 10 4 = 4,000,000 : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 350,000 2 = 700,000 IRB 200,000 1 = 200,000-100,000 5 8 = 4,000,000 13,340 1,060 4,822 2,530 7,300 2,748 10,200-76 -

8. 25,000 20 4 = 2,000,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 3,000 ( ) () () ( ) - 77 -

(4) 252 (, ),,.,,,. 1 (2015~2019)(, 2015: 54) - 78 -

3 (2016~2020)(, 2016: 64-85),, (, 2016: 258), (, 2012: 36)., (, 2015). (, 2015) (, 2015: 25) +,, (, 2016: 258-260),,,. PMI (Consultatiebureau) - 79 -

(2016),,. (, ),,, - 80 -

2 () GIS () PMI () - 81 -

,, (,, ) : (, ) : 500, 500 1,000 - - (: + ) - - GIS () FGI,,, PMI,, 2~3 15. - 82 -

.,..,, () () 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-83 -

I J I5 I6 J3 () (Integrated Support System) ( Support (Service (Support pregnancy (networking) Integration) rearing) and childbirth) 親 親 2 2 45 48 53-84 -

() ( ) 2,500,000 1 5 = 12,500,000 70,000 1 11 5 = 3,850,000 2,000 300 = 600,000 20,000 20 = 400,000 / 5,000 12 = 60,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 150 = 2,933,000 43,610 10 = 436,100 920,000 60,000 2 = 120,000 50 120page 120 = 720,000 80,000 1 = 80,000 ( ) - 700,000 2 = 1,400,000 - ( ) 100,000 4 7 = 2,800,000-20,000 4 14 = 1,120,000 (,, 6 8) - 2,220,600 2 = 4,441,200 - (,, ) ( 1 1 ) ($35 8+$160 6+$78 8) 1,130= 2,106,320 ( 1 2 ) ($30 8+$137 6+$59 8) 1,130= 1,724,380 50,000 4 2 = 400,000 50,000 3 2 = 300,000 6,000 4 4 4 = 384,000 100,000 10 3 = 3,000,000 300,000 2 = 600,000 : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 16,350 1,060 4,289 1,400 12,192 1,084 13,500-85 -

200,000 3 = 600,000 100,000 4 = 400,000 (,,, ) 400,000 4 1 = 1,600,000 2,500,000 2 = 5,000,000 ( ) 50,000 20 = 1,000,000 25,000 120 = 3,000,000 25,000 20 6 = 3,000,000 25,000 15 3 = 1,125,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 () : 20,000 500 = 10,000,000 : 20,000 500 = 10,000,000 ( ) 8,125 20,000 ( ) - 86 -

(5), DB.,,,..,.,,..,,,., - 87 -

. (),, (, 2013). 3 (2016~2020), 3 (2016~2020),.,. 2016 11 ( ) ( ),.,,,.,.,.,,.,.. - 88 -

,.,.,,.,,,. - 89 -

( ),,,,,,,, ( ),,,,,.,.., FGI,,,, - 90 -

,, (Focus Group Interview) ( ) 400., (, ), FGI.,, (, ), (Hebamme) (Tagesmutter)., 3, (),.,.,,. - 91 -

2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FGI / I I6 () (Baby-sitter) (Baby-sitter) (Home Based Child Care) - 92 -

() 78,000 ( ) - 93 -

( ) ( ) - 94 -

(6) 4.. 2016 3. 1.21 OECD. 2016 4 0.26 0.03...,,, - 95 -

. 4,,,. 4. 4. 4,.,.. 4. 4,. 4. - 96 -

4 4-97 -

. 4, 4-98 -

4 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 회의 / 면담등구체적진행은상황에따라조정가능함. - 99 -

Ⅰ Ⅰ6 4 () (The Fourth Industrial Revolution) (birth) (child-rearing) (big data) (data-based) () 70,000 1 13 7 = 6,370,000 ( ) 33,870-100 -

2,500,000 1 11 =27,500,000 2,000 200 = 400,000 20,000 20 = 400,000 5,000 20 = 100,000 (, ) (8,180+101 95) 1.1 200 = 3,911,000 87,900 10 = 879,000 ( ) - 800,000 1 = 800,000 PC 70,000 1 7 = 490,000 70,000 1 11 = 770,000 - ( ) 100,000 3 4 = 1,200,000-20,000 3 10 = 600,000 100,000 4 = 400,000 50,000 3 3 = 450,000 6,000 3 5 7 = 630,000 100,000 5 7 = 3,500,000 : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 IRB 300,000 2 = 600,000 100,000 2 40 = 8,000,000 25,000 6 10 = 1,500,000 6 = 900,000 900 4,790 2,060 1,800 1,480 13,400 2,400 ( ) 10,000,000 1 6 = 60,000,000 60,000 ( ) - 101 -

() () ( ),.,,. - 102 -

(7), 55( ),.,,,,.,..,,,,, - 103 -

.,,..,,,.,.,. - 104 -

, ( ),,,,,, - 105 -

,, (50 ),,, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-106 -

2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I(), M(), I6( ), M2() () (Local Childcare Finance) (Local Early Childhood Education Finance) (Financial Analysis),,,,, - 107 -

() 45,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 5 = 12,500,000 70,000 1 4 3 = 840,000 2,000 300 = 600,000 20,000 20 = 400,000 / 5,000 12 = 60,000 10,000 50 2 = 1,000,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 300 = 5,866,000 168,000 10 = 1,680,000 ( ) - 700,000 1 = 700,000 PC 70,000 1 5 = 350,000 70,000 1 3 = 210,000 - ( ) 100,000 2 8 = 1,600,000-20,000 3 10 = 600,000 100,000 3 3 = 900,000 50,000 2 = 100,000 50,000 3 2 = 300,000 13,340 2,060 8,916 1,260 3,100 724-108 -

6,000 3 6 3 = 324,000 100,000 5 6 = 3,000,000 - : 200,000 2 1 = 400,000 - : 300,000 3 1 = 900,000 200,000 1 2 = 400,000 IRB 200,000 1 = 200,000 ( ) 3,000,000 1 = 3,000,000-60,000 50 = 3,000,000-100,000 5 2 = 1,000,000, 10,000 100 1 = 1,000,000 25,000 8 6 = 1,200,000 25,000 5 4 3 = 1,500,000 ( ) 11,900 3,700 ( ) - 109 -

(8).,,.,,.,,.,,.. 2016,.... - 110 -

2016 1.17 10. - (Eurofound, 2016).. 2016 68.8%. 41.5%.. - (Eurofound, 2016).... 2015 65% 50,,.... - 111 -

..,,,.,,. - 112 -

(,, ), ( ),, - 113 -

(400), (400), (400),, FGI (15), (15), (15), FGI EU (Work-life balance) Eurofound - 114 -

FGI 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I. I6 - - () (Work-life balance) (family-friendly working condition) (child care) - (, ) - 115 -

- () ( ) 2,500,000 1 5 = 12,500,000 70,000 1 12 8 = 6,720,000 : 70,000 3 13 1 = 2,730,000 3,000 100 = 300,000 20,000 10 = 200,000 / 5,000 12 = 60,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 150 = 2,933,000 50 400page 150 = 3,000,000 315,236 10 = 3,152,360 (,, ) 850,000 3 = 2,550,000 1,000,000 1 = 1,000,000 PC 70,000 1 5 = 350,000 70,000 1 8 = 560,000 21,950 560 9,085 4,460-116 -

- 100,000 3 5 = 1,500,000-20,000 3 10 = 600,000 100,000 2 5 = 1,000,000 ((), 2, 3 4)) 2,321,500 2 = 4,643,000 ( 2, 1, 3 4) (35$*4+160$*4+78$*3) 1,130 2 = 2,291,640 ( ) 100,000 4 = 400,000 50,000 3 1 = 150,000 300,000 1 = 300,000 6,000 3 5 4 = 360,000 ( ) 300,000 1 = 300,000 100,000 5 5 = 2,500,000 200,000 2 = 400,000 300,000 3 = 900,000 IRB 2(200,000 2) = 400,000 ( ) 1,000,000 1 = 1,000,000 ( 3 ) 1,000,000 1 = 1,000,000 200,000 6 = 1,200,000 150,000 5 = 750,000-100,000 15 = 1,500,000 100,000 15 = 1,500,000 100,000 15 = 1,500,000 25,000 10 4 = 1,000,000 20,000 25 2 = 1,000,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 25,000 150 = 3,750,000 () - 10,035 1,510 12,650 6,750 18,000-117 -

15,000 400 = 6,000,000-15,000 400 = 6,000,000-15,000 400 = 6,000,000 ( ) () () ( ) - 118 -

(9),,. 2016 1.17,. 2016 40 6 1970 100 7..,.., 10., 1991 89,441 2016 145. 1991 3,690 2016 41,084. 0~2 2011~2013 3. - 119 -

2011 2012 2000 8,494 2015 8,930. 2013,,,. 2000 85.8% 2016 82.1%. 70%.,,, (20~39 65 ).,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,, 75%.,.,.,,. - 120 -

-: -(): (2007) -:,, -: -(): (2016) -: -: -(): (2016) -:,,,, -,,. - -:,, 232 - - - - DB -, - -:,,, - -, - - :, -:,, - -, -,,, -, - - - - - -,, - - - - - - - - 121 -

, (, ), : ~ 2018, : ~ 2018,,,, (,, ),,, - 122 -

, ~,,,, (1991~2017),,,, -, -,, 300 2012~2017,, GIS,,,, - 123 -

2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A J M (childcare (demand (low fertility () (kindergarten) center) prediction) policy) ( ),, - 124 -

() 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ( ) 2,500,000 1 5 = 12,500,000 70,000 1 9 10 = 6,300,000 2,000 200 = 400,000 50,000 4 = 200,000 50,000 10 = 500,000 (, ) (8,180+101 95) 1.1 193P = 3,774,000 56,400 10 = 564,000 50 2000page 5 = 500,000 PC 70,000 1 5 = 350,000 ( ) 700,000 1 = 700,000 - ( ) 100,000 2 5 = 1,000,000-20,000 3 10 = 600,000 100,000 3 3 = 900,000 ( ) 50,000 20 = 1,000,000 50,000 3 10 = 1,500,000 6,000 3 3 3= 162,000 100,000 6 10 = 6,000,000 18,800 1,100 4,838 1,050 2,500 2,662 43,300-125 -

8. : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 : GIS, - 3,000,000 2 = 6,000,000 ( ) - (, ) 50,000 300 2 = 30,000,000 25,000 10 10 = 2,500,000 25,000 5 10 = 1,250,000 3,750 ( ) - 126 -

(10) (Korean Child Friendly City, KCFC).,, (,, 2007). - - 2018,, - 1 (2015-127 -

~2019) -,,,. 2013.,,. WHO, (2009), (2009) -,,,,,,,,,,,,, - 2017 10 46 //, - 128 -

(Korean Child Friendly City, KCFC), 1990 1. (KCFC),, - 129 -

-: -():(, ) (2016) -: -: -(): ( ), (2015) -: -: -(): (2015) -: - -: -: (,,,,, ) - - : - - -:, -:1), 2) - 대국민조사 : 국내거주국민 5000 명대상아동친화도시관련수요자욕구조사 - (deep-depth interview) : 1) ( 기인증, 비인증, 인증추진중지자체담당공무원 ), 2) 아동및해당부모를대상으로시행 - : 서울, 경기, 충정, 부산, 전라권역당대표지자체와유관연구최초로오스트리아, 독일주요도시방문하여자료수집및사례조사 - :, NGO, - - - - - - - - - - - - -, - - - 130 -

(), ( ) UN ( : ),,,, 5 NGO, - /,,, - 131 -

(KCFC),, --, - : 3,000 - : (deep-depth interview) - - - - -,,,, 5, - -- - - 132 -

-, ( ) 2018 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 I. 16. () (Communit (Child (governa (Child (Child (Quality of (Law birth y) friendly) nce) right) welfare) life) rate) - 133 -

() 80,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 6 = 15,000,000 70,000 1 15 5 = 5,250,000 70,000 1 10 5 = 3,500,000 2,500 100 = 250,000 30,000 3 = 90,000 (, ) (8,180+101 95) 160p 1.1 = 3,128,000 50 200page 10 = 100,000 23,750 340 5,403-134 -

217,472 10 = 2,174,720 PC 70,000 1 6 = 420,000 70,000 1 4 = 280,000 - ( ) 100,000 3 8 = 2,400,000-20,000 3 10 = 600,000 ( 2, 5 7) - 2,259,600 2 = 4,519,200 - ( 2, 2 ) ($30*7 + $137*5 + $59*7) 1,130 2 = 2,956,080 50,000 4 = 200,000 50,000 2 2 = 200,000 6,000 3 8 3 = 432,000 200,000 2 = 400,000 300,000 3 = 900,000 IRB 200,000 1 = 200,000 1,000,000 2 = 2,000,000 1: (, ) 2: 2,500,000 2 = 5,000,000 1) : 100,000 10 = 1,000,000 2) : 50,000 10 = 500,000 100,000 5 = 500,000 700 12,075 832 13,900 5,000-135 -

18,000 ( ) ( ) - 136 -

(11) OECD TALIS 2) - OECD TALIS Starting Strong Survey 2018. 4... OECD, 2) 교원 은교사와원장을통칭하는표현으로, 본사업의한국명칭을 OECD TALSI 국제유아교원조사 로함을반영함. 다만, 교원 / 교사용어를맥락에따라함께사용함. - 137 -

,., OECD (ISCED 0.2). 3),,. OECD ECEC(Early Childhood Education and Care) 2018. ECEC,. 1 -: - / -3-5 / 3) 유아교원 (3-5 세아동대상교사와원장, ISCED 0.2) 만을대상으로 TALIS 국제비교연구에참여함. 향후 2 주기사업에서는관련예산의확보를고려하여영아교사 (0-2 세아동대상교사 ) 도함께조사하는방안을논의할수있음. - 138 -

2 3 :OECD TALIS 2017 -(): (2017) -: OECD TALIS Starting Strong Survey, 3-5 (Field Trial) -TALIS Starting Strong Survey -2018 - -: - : TALIS 2 - -TALIS -(): (2015) - -: OECD-TALIS -/,,, -: - -(): (2015) -:, 3, -OECD TALIS 2018 - (3-5), OECD. - () - - - - / (Main Survey) -OECD - 258 2,006 258 - -/,, -/ - -, <TALIS 2008-2013 > - - - () - - - - - - - - - (ECEC Staff). -2017,. - 139 -

연도사업진행조사대상 2017 (Field Trial) 42 359 2018 (Main Survey) 258 2,264 2019 OECD TALIS 3S 2020 (2018- ) :,,,,, :,,,, 2018 TALIS 3S (N=2,264: 258, 2,006) OECD TALIS NPM(National Project Manager), NDM(National Data Manager)/NSM(National Sampling Manager) - 140 -

OECD ECEC 3S (NPM) (1/4 분기 ) 본조사수행준비및 7 차네트워크회의 - (2/4) (NPM) - (3/4) 8 *. 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TALIS 3S TALIS 3S TALIS 3S M () I () M2 () I6( ) / OECD TALIS () (staff) (International Survey) (OECD) TALIS Starting Strong Survey - 141 -

OECD () ECEC () () () () 129,300 70,000 1 7 3 = 1,470,000 70,000 1 7 5 = 2,450,000 13,920 2,500,000 1 4 = 10,000,000 2,000 200 = 400,000 20,000 18 = 360,000 760 (, ) (8,180+101 95) 1.1 150 = 2,933,000 OECD () 40,000,000 1 = 40,000,000 54,483 10 = 544,830 ( ) - 500,000 1 = 500,000 250,000 2 = 500,000 70,000 1 4 = 280,000 - ( ) 43,478 1,280 13,124-142 -

100,000 3 2 = 600,000-20,000 3 5 = 300,000 100,000 5 = 500,000 50,000 3 2 = 300,000 6,000 3 3 7 = 378,000 100,000 5 5 = 2,500,000 (Center Coordinator) 50,000 258 1 = 12,900,000 (, ) 300,000 2 2 = 1,200,000 200,000() 2 = 400,000 300,000() 3 = 900,000 IRB 200,000 1 = 200,000-100,000 3 5 = 1,500,000 25,000 10 8 = 2,000,000 / () 15,000 1 2,264 = 33,960,000 1,178 19,600 2,000 33,960-143 -

- 144 -

(12) 양식 EBOP01 EBOP02. EBOP03,. EBOP04 EBOP05 () EBOP06-145 -

EBOP07 2009. 4. 30. 2011. 12. 30. 2014. 2. 4. 2016. 12. 30. 1(). 2( ) 1 1 ( 2011. 12. 30). 2. 1..... 2...... (T/F ) 3( ) 1 ( 2011. 12. 30). 2,,. 3. 4. - 146 -

EBOP07 4( ) 1 (, ). 2 1. 3 3 ( 2011. 12. 30). 2. 3 2,. 3. 2. 5( ) 1, 2 1 ( 2011. 12. 30). 2 ( 2011. 12. 30). 3,. 3 : 1 ( 2011. 12. 30, 2014. 2. 4) 1 (). 2 (). (2011. 12. 30) 1 (). (2014. 2. 4) - 147 -

EBOP07 1 (). (2016. 12. 30.) 1 (). - 148 -

. (1) KICCE ERP02 ERP03.,,. ERP04,,, ERP05 ERP06,.. - 151 -

ERP07 (10/) 2018. 1. 1. 2018.12.31. () ERP08 30,000 20,000 15 = 300,000 13 9,000,000 1 = 9,000,000 (8,180+101 115) 1.1 50 5 = 5,443,000 50 6000page 1 = 300,000 68,700 10 = 687,000 ( ) -, 650,000 4 = 2,600,000-20,000 3 2 = 120,000 50,000 5 5 = 1,250,000 6,000 4 25 = 600,000, - 400,000 2 2 = 1,600,000-200,000 5 2 = 2,000,000-300,000 1 2 = 600,000-200,000 2 8 = 3,200,000 300 15,430 2,600 1,370 600 7,400, 25,000 30 2 = 1,500,000 10,000 10 8 = 800,000 2,300-152 -

( ) ERP09-153 -

(2) ERP01 ERP02 ERP03.,.. ERP04 KICCE 3 International Journal of child care and education policy 2 ERP05 ERP06,.,.. - 154 -

ERP07 (11/) 2018.1.1. 2018.12.31. () 40,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 6 = 15,000,000 15,000-1,107 250 3= 830,000-2,590 {120,000() 2+150,000() 2 +170,000() 2} 2 = 1,760,000 KICCE - 50 120page 250 3=4,500,000-4,000 55 3 = 660,000 12,310 KICCE - () 500(715,000) 10 = 7,150,000-60 20,000 1 3 = 60,000 KICCE - 100,000 9 3 = 2,700,000-50,000 3 10 3 = 4,500,000 9,200 KICCE - 100,000 2 5 2 = 2,000,000-840 20,000 14 3 = 840,000 ERP08 ( ) ERP09-155 -

(3) ERP01 ERP02 ERP03 (The ECEC Hub of the Asia region). ERP04,, 13 - MOU MOU MOU OECD, UNESCO, UNICEF, World Bank, ARNEC -,, (),, - 156 -

,,, - (NCCIC), (ERIC), (NAEYC), (PECERA), (EECERA), OMEP( ) PECERA, SRCD, NAEYC, EECERA, OMEP,, ERP05, ERP06 ERP07 (10/) 2018. 1. 1. 2018.12.31. () ERP08 40,000 () 10,000 50 = 500,000 VIP : 50,000 20 = 1,000,000 : 2,500 100 = 250,000 () 50 2000page 2 = 200,000 500 2,173-157 -

72,316 10 = 723,160 ( ) - 800,000원 1회 = 800,000 () - 100,000 2 2 = 400,000-20,000 2 5 = 200,000 1) MOU (, 2, 1, 1, 57) - 2,220,600 3 1 = 6,661,800 - (), 2, 1, 1 ) ($35 7+$223 5+$107 7) 1,130 3=7,149,514 2) (,, 3, 1, 34) - 860,850 3 = 2,582,550 - (, 3, 1 ) ($35 4+$223 3+$107 4) 1,130 3=4,193,432 () 6,000 4 5 2 = 240,000 250,000 4 = 1,000,000 () 100,000 5 3 = 1,500,000 () ( ) 1,000,000 1 = 1,000,000 13 25,000 120 = 3,000,000 25,000 8 3 = 600,000 - MOU 80,000 5 2 = 800,000-80,000 15 = 1,200,000 MOU 6,000,000 1 = 6,000,000 800 21,187 240 3,500 5,600 6,000-158 -

( ) ERP09-159 -

(4) ERP01 ERP02 ERP03, ERP04 (: OECD,, ), 2, ERP05 ERP06-160 -

(11/) 2018. 1. 1. 2018.12.31 ERP07 () ERP08 30,000 ( ) - 1,500,000 6(6) 1 = 9,000,000-500,000 4 1 = 2,000,000 2,000 500 = 1,000,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 150 2 = 5,866,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 100 = 1,955,000 50 4,000page 3 = 600,000 81,900 10 = 819,000 - ( ) 100,000 2 4 = 800,000-20,000 3 10 = 600,000 6,000 5 2 6 = 360,000 ( ) 1,000,000 2 1 = 2,000,000 500,000 6 = 3,000,000 25,000 10 8 = 2,000,000 11,000 1,000 9,240 1,400 360 5,000 2,000 ( ) ERP09-161 -

- 162 -

. (1) ESP01 ESP02 ESP03.,,.. ESP04,,, ESP05 ESP06. - 165 -

.. ESP07 (11/) 2018. 1. 1. 2018.12.31. () ESP08 42,000 () - 3,000 34 3 1 = 306,000-3,000 34 2 1 = 204,000 ( ) - 5,000 34 3 1 = 510,000-5,000 34 2 1 = 340,000 (8,180+101 25) 1.1 30 1 = 353,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 100 = 1,956,000-72 50 34 5 1=612,000 2,000 34 5 1=340,000-108 50 34 6 1=1,102,000 2,000 34 6 1= 408,000 164,500 2 = 329,000-100,000 4 6 = 2,400,000-20,000 2 5 = 200,000 1,360 5,100 2,600-166 -

6,000 4 10 = 240,000-100,000 10 2 = 2,000,000-200,000 6 2 = 2,400,000-150,000 6 2 = 1,800,000-150,000 6 2 =1,800,000-200,000 4 3 = 2,400,000-25,000 15 2 = 750,000-25,000 10 2 = 500,000-25,000 10 2 = 500,000 8 = 1,400,000 25,000 10 3 = 750,000 () 25,000 10 2 = 500,000 10,000,000 1 = 10,000,000 7,900,000 1 = 7,900,000 240 10,400 4,400 17,900 ( ) ESP09-167 -

(2) ESP01 ESP02 ESP03,,,.,,. ESP04 : 1(, ) () : 4 (e-newsletter): : KICCE Policy Brief: 3 : 1 ESP05-168 -

ESP06,.,. (11/) 2018. 1. 1. 2018.12.31. () ESP07 ESP08 47,000 650,000 4 = 2,600,000 300,000 12 = 3,600,000 () 12,500 80 1 = 1,000,000 3,875 80 1 = 310,000 (, ) - 1,000,000 1 = 1,000,000-215 20p 500 2 = 4,300,000-2,000,000 1 = 2,000,000-50 130page 600 1 = 3,900,000 ( ) 400,000 12 = 4,800,000 50 50page 800 4 = 8,000,000 50 22page 500 12 = 6,600,000 KICCE Policy Brief 50 80page 170 3 = 2,040,000 50 346page 150 1 = 2,600,000 50 330page 100 1 = 1,650,000 7,510 36,890 - ( ) 200-169 -

() ESP08 100,000 1 1 = 100,000-20,000 1 5 = 100,000-3.0 100,000 2 1 = 200,000-100,000 2 1 = 200,000 200,000 3 = 600,000 200,000 3 = 600,000 25,000 6 2 = 300,000 25,000 4 2 = 200,000 25,000 3 4 = 300,000 400 1,200 800 ( ) ESP09-170 -

EGGP01 ㆍ ESP02 ESP03 ESP04 ESP05 ESP06-171 -

ESP07 (11/) 2018. 1. 1 2018.12.31 () ESP08 6,000 100,000 4 = 400,000 400 100,000 2 1 = 200,000 6,000 2 2 5 = 120,000 320-100,000 2 7 = 1,400,000-20,000 2 10 = 400,000-200,000 1 = 200,000-200,000 2 = 400,000, 2,480,000 = 2,480,000 25,000 4 4= 400,000 1,800 600 2,480 400 ( ) ESP09-172 -

(1) Ⅳ. 5, 2018 4. (, 2016), (, 2016).,,. 2010 (, 2010), 1,594 9.2%, 11.6%. 2005 (, 2010). (, 2016) 2011 2,515 2015 930, (, 2016)., - 177 -

.,,.,. -, ().,..,.,,. 1 -: - - (3 - : 6, 21 ) -(): - : - (207 ) - 178 -

2 3 (2016) 10 -: -: 10 -: 200,. -: -(): (2014) -: -: Ⅱ: -(): (2013) -: -, -, - -,, - -: 20 - :, 20 - - - : 350 - : 6,543 510 - : 50 -: - - -: 500-100 -: 10 - - - - - - - - -, - - - -,, - - - 2015 2017 3,. - 179 -

2015,. 2016,,,. 2017,. 5 4. 1(2015). 2(2016). 3(2017). 4(2018). 5(2019). 4(2018).,, - (, ) - - - 180 -

-, -. - -,,,, -. -., 500 -. 100 -, - 181 -

10, 10. 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I I4 / I6-182 -

(unmarried (unmarried (child care (supporting () (child rearing) mother) father) policy) child care)... () ( ) 19,780 600 3,600 2,860-183 -

( ) ( ) 4,840 2,720 9,600 4,000 22,000-184 -

( ) - 185 -

(2) Ⅲ 4 (2016~2020) 2002 4 (2016~2020) 4 (2016~2020),.. - 186 -

- - 3, 5 212 6. - (2014). : -:. (2015). : -: (NASA) 4, 5.,. -,,,,. - -, - - -,, - NASA Mission-X, 4, 5 4, 5 -,, - (2016). - (I): - (,, ) - -: 4 5 - ( ) KICCE, 4, 5 (2015). - - : -: OECD. - 4 5 NASA Mission-X - - - OECD ISCED0. -. -. - - ( ) - ( ) - - 1 2 KICCE - KICCE - - 187 -

(2014). :, (2015). :,, NASA Mission-X, 4, 5 KICCE (2016). (I): 4 5 NASA Mission-X (). (Ⅱ): 4 5 KICCE (1, 2) KICCE,, 1 2 KICCE 4~5 6~7-188 -

( 1, 1) KICCE,, () 4, 5, 6, 7 250 1,000, NASA Mission-X Working Group Face-to-Face Meeting 2017 (Ⅱ), 2018 NASA Mission X Face-to-Face Meeting - 189 -

,,, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 J J4-190 -

() (young child) (physical activity) (health) (nutrition) (obesity) () 70,000 2 13 4 = 7,280,000 70,000 1 13 5 = 4,550,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 5 = 12,500,000 2,000 200 = 400,000 20,000 20 = 400,000 10,000 10 = 100,000 24,330 900-191 -

(8,180+101 95) 200 1.1 = 3,910,500 10,000 1,000 = 10,000,000 50,000 20 = 1,000,000 50 300page 10 = 150,000 41,148 10 = 411,482 ( ) - 1,000,000 1 = 1,000,000 PC 70,000 1 4 = 280,000 70,000 1 5 = 350,000 70,000 1 5 = 350,000 - ( ) 100,000 3 8 = 2,400,000-20,000 3 10 = 600,000 (, 2, 5 7) - 2,220,600 2 = 4,441,200 - ( 2,, 2) ($30*7 + $176*5 + $81*7) 1,130 2 = 3,744,818 50,000 4 = 200,000 50,000 2 4 = 400,000 6,000 3 8 3 = 432,000 200,000 1 = 200,000 100,000 4 10 = 4,000,000 200,000 2 = 400,000 300,000 3 = 900,000 50,000 10 = 500,000 IRB 200,000 1 = 200,000 2,500,000 2 = 5,000,000 10,000 1,000 = 10,000,000 25,000 8 10 = 2,000,000 15,472 1,980 11,186 1,232 21,000 2,900-192 -

6 = 600,000 25,000 4 3 = 300,000 ( ) ( ). - 193 -

(3) KICCE (Ⅱ)..,.,. 2017 5 KICCE, 2. 1-194 -

. 2(2018) 1,.. 2017 1. 1,. - : KICCE i-pol (2007-2015) - (): KICCE - : KICCE,, - : (KEDI POLL 1-10) - (): KEDI(1999, 2001, 2006, 2008, 2010-2015) - : - : 2014 ( ) - (): (2014) - : 1977. -. - KICCE i-pol. - : 19 75, 2,000 (2015 ) - : (2015 ) - :,,, 9 53 (2015 ) - : 17,664 13 37,000 - - i-pol /. - - - - - - - - - 195 -

- : (The Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public s Attitudes Toward the Public Schools) - (): Phi Delta Kappa(1969-2015) - : 12, - : (Early Childhood Longitudinal Survey) - (): (National Center for Education Statistics) - : (Kindergarten cohort) (Birth cohort), - : - ():,, (2013) - :,,. - : - ():,, (2015) - :,. -, (, ) - :, 14 21 35 - : 18-2014 2015-1,001-3,499 - : - 1 (Kindergarten cohort) - :,,,,,, - 2 (Birth cohort) - : 2001, 14,000 -, -,, 3,, ( 1,500). -,. - (, ). - - : 1,045 98. -,,. -. - - - - - - -,,, -,,, -, (,, ),,, -, -. -,. -. - - - -, - 196 -

,,. - ( ). - - - ( 5., 100. 3.0,, 1 -, - - KICCE - 197 -

-. -. -,, 5. -,..,.,,. ( ) -,. - 19,,, 2,000. - pool. -,,. - 198 -

- 2. - 400 1 (100). FGI,,,.. KICCE POLL (1 ) 3.0. 100( ) / 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-199 -

I(), M(), I6( ), M2() KICCE () (KICCE POLL) (Child care culture) (Child care policy) (), (), ( ),. () 1. 28,640-200 -

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 70,000 1 13 4 = 3,640,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 10 =25,000,000 2,000 200 = 400,000 20,000 20 = 400,000 5,000 20 = 100,000 (, ) (8,180+101 95) 1.1 200 = 3,911,000 4,000 2,000 = 8,000,000 28,900 10 = 289,000 ( ) - 400,000 1 = 400,000 PC 70,000 1 10 = 700,000 - ( ) 100,000 3 6 = 1,800,000-20,000 3 4 = 240,000 ( ) 100,000 4 = 400,000 50,000 3 3 = 450,000 6,000 3 5 3 = 270,000 100,000 5 5 = 2,500,000 200,000 4 = 800,000 - : 200,000 2 = 400,000 - : 300,000 3 = 900,000 IRB 200,000 2 = 400,000 FGI 100,000 6 5 = 3,000,000 25,000 10 5 = 1,250,000 10,000 3 100 = 3,000,000 25,000 6 5 = 750,000 () - 900 12,200 1,100 2,040 1,120 8,000 5,000 41,000-201 -

12,000 1 2,000 = 24,000,000-11,000 2 500 = 11,000,000 500,000 12 = 6,000,000 ( ) ( ) (, ). - 202 -

(4) 2018~2022 2017 5,..,. 2006 3, (3 ) (1.13). 4,. - 1 22, ( ). (2016) 2013 62,984, 2014 66,446, 2016 70,228. -,,. 111,419, 61,321, 35,450, 30,199 (, 2016),.,,., 2015,.,. - 203 -

,,.,,.,. -: - (2010-2015) - -(): (2010), (2011), - (2012), (2013, 2014, - 2015) -:, (: ). -: - (2010-2015) - -(): (2011, 2012, 2013), (2014), - (2015) - -:, (:, ). -: - -/ -(): (2016) DB -: 2006,. - -: - *2015: *2014: 5, *2013: *2012:, *2011: -: - *2011: *2012:,, *2013: *2014:, *2015: - - - - - - 204 -

5 - - -, - - - -,. - - (1) -2-2. -.,. 1(2018 ).. -. -, 1) (;, ; ) 2). - 1),,,,,. - 2) (, ),,..,. 2, (). 2 (). - 205 -

.,, (, ),, (: ) (1 ) (1., ) (STAKES),, (),,,. 1,000, 2,000, 1,000 -, (:,, ),,,,. -,, - 206 -

. 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I M I6 M2 () (Child Care Policy) (Early Children Education) (Early Children Care) (Policy Evaluation) ((Policy Proposal) - 207 -

() 70,000 1 14 7 = 6,860,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 6 = 15,000,000 3,000 100 = 300,000 10,000 20 1 = 200,000 / 5,000 20 = 100,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 200 = 3,911,000 58,470 10 = 584,700 ( ) 500,000 2 = 1,000,000 PC 70,000 1 7 = 490,000 70,000 1 6 = 420,000 - ( ) 100,000 3 5 = 1,500,000-20,000 3 1 5 = 300,000-100,000 4 2 = 800,000 21,860 600 4,496 1,910 10,474-208 -

(, 4 6: 1, 1) - 2,581,150 2 = 5,162,300 - ( 100,000 4 = 400,000 50,000 3 2 = 300,000 ( ) 300,000 3 = 900,000 6,000 3 10 2 = 360,000 300,000 2 = 600,000 100,000 14 = 1,400,000 IRB 200,000 1 = 200,000 200,000 2 = 400,000 300,000 3 = 900,000 20,000 3 15 = 900,000 30,000( ) 10 = 300,000 50,000( ) 10 = 500,000 25,000 8 10 =2,000,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 -,, 3,000 12,000 3,000 = 36,000,000-12,000 1,000 = 12,000,000 2,500,000 1 = 2,500,000 2,560 4,600 3,000 50,500 ( ) - 209 -

( ) - 210 -

(5),,,.,.,.,.,. 2017 5, 5.,,. 2017 5.,. - 211 -

,,,.,,.,.,,., (, ),. A-1..,.,.,.,. -, (, ) A-1., A-3. KICCE - 212 -

- A-2.. A-2.. -, 2017 3 2.2%, 9.8%, 3.1%, 2.8%.., 1, 2..,. A-3. KICCE.,,,.,,., (, ) - 213 -

,,.,,.. -: -(): (2016) -:,. -: -(): (2016) -: -: (1991, 1996, 2001) -(): (1991, 1996, 2001) -:,. - - - (1,202), - - - 62 6-27,000 -: - - Simulation -(): (2011) - - -, - - - - - - - - - - -(Rotation model) -(Rotation Sampling) - 214 -

-: 2005 (rotation sample). -: Survey of Income and Program Participation(SIPP) -(): (Census Bureau)(2004, 2008, 2014) -:,,. -: (Ⅳ) -(): (2016) -: -: 2015 - -(): (2016) -:. -: : 2004-2014 -(): (2014) - 4 -: -2 : (2012, 2013 -: 1,312( 1,820) (: ) -: 2,593( 3,650) -:,,,, - : 2004, 2009, 2012,, - -. -,,,. - 16 9., - 6 5, 19 4( 23 6, 4 8 ) - 11 8. -, 563. 0-234, 5.4%. - 1 195, 6 4,114. - 45.6%, 21.4%. - 96,400 2.7% - 35.2%, 23.5%. - : 1-215 -

-: 2004 10,,,. -: -(): (2015) -: 0-5 -: 250, 1000,. - - : - - -: - - -(): - (2012) -:,. -: KICCE -(): (2013) -:, 3 -: KICCE (II) -(): (2014) -: 2,. - - 2 - - (1997~2013 ) - 2-1, 2-1 2004 157,600, 2009 189,500, 2012 208,700 ( ) - - ( ) - : 2014 2024 2.3% - :. - :,.,, 5. - - - -. -,.. -. -2014 - -2013-2014 - 216 -

-: KICCE - (Ⅲ) -(): (2015) -:,,. -. -, -, - 2018 2022 - - - - (1997~2014 ) - 3-1, 2, 3 - - ( ) - - - - - - - : - - - - - - - - -/. -, -,, - - - - - - - -, -, - -,, -2013-2018 ( ) - - - 217 -

5, 3( ), 2018 2022 5 A-1.,. A-1.. - A-1.. -,,.,,. A-1.. - 1 2-3 ( ) 4 5 6-7 8 9-10 11 12 -,,, A-2., 5.,,. - 218 -

-,,,. -, -, -. - 1 (2018). - 2 (2019) 1,, - 3 (2020),,. - 4 (2021) - 5 (2022), 4-219 -

A-3. KICCE (2018-2022) - - 2013 KICCE. - -, (2018-2022) - - - A-3. KICCE - 1 (2018) :, 6-2 (2019) 2013-3 (2020) - 4 (2021) VAR(Vector AutoRegression) / - 5 (2022) 2013-2022 3 5. 1 3 () - 220 -

, 5. A-1., -. -,. A-1.,. - (Rotation). 1,600( 2,400 ), A-1.,, -,. -,. - 221 -

,. A-2. - A-3. KICCE - A-3. KICCE - - 2018 () 2 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-222 -

I. I6. () (Consumption Survey) (Parents () Perception of Childrearing Costs) (Rotation Panel Survey) (Demand for (Childcare (Childrearing ECEC Cost) Price Index) services) (,, ), - 223 -

3 1 3 2 3 2 3 4 3 5 2 1 2 42 48 49 65 71 18, 26 () 300,000 < > 70,000 1 14 5 = 4,900,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 7 = 17,500,000 1. < > 70,000 1 5 4 = 1,400,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 1 = 2,500,000 39,450 2. <KICCE > 70,000 1 15 3 = 3,150,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 4 = 10,000,000 < > 3,000 100 = 300,000 10,000 5 10 = 500,000 5,000 10 10 = 500,000 < > 2,450-224 -

2,000 100 = 200,000-5,000 10 = 50,000 <KICCE > 2,000 250 = 500,000 20,000 20= 400,000 < > (8,180+101 95) 200 1.1 = 3,911,000 29,736 10 = 297,360 50 1000apge 5 = 250,000 3. < > (8,180+101 95) 200 1.1 = 3,911,000 15,900 10 = 159,000 13,288 <KICCE > (8,180+101 95) 1.1 200p = 3,911,000 84,900 10 = 849,000 < > (SAS) 6,000,000 1 = 6,000,000 ( ) 550,000 1 = 550,000 PC 70,000 1 7 = 490,000 70,000 1 3 = 210,000 4. < > ( ) 500,000 2 = 1,000,000 13,540 <KICCE > (SAS) 4,500,000 1copy = 4,500,000 PC 70,000 1 3 = 210,000 70,000 1 4 = 280,000 ( ) - 225 -

5. 300,000 1 = 300,000 < > - 100,000 3 5 = 1,500,000-20,000 3 5 = 300,000 (, 56) - - 3,108,350 2() = 6,216,700 - ( 2, 2 ) - ($30*6 + $137*5 + $59*6) 1,130 2 = 2,754,940 - < > - 100,000 2 1 = 200,000 - ( ) 100,000 2 3 = 600,000-20,000 3 5 = 300,000 <KICCE > - ( ) 100,000 3 2 = 600,000-20,000 3 5 = 300,000 100,000 2 3 = 600,000 < > ( ) 100,000 2 = 200,000 50,000 4 2 = 400,000 6,000 2 5 7 = 420,000 300,000 2 = 600,000 13,372 6. < > ( ) 50,000 2 = 100,000 50,000 2 2 = 200,000 300,000 2 = 600,000 6,000 4 5 4 = 480,000 <KICCE > 4,600-226 -

100,000 2 1 = 200,000 ( ) 100,000 5 1 = 500,000 6,000 5 10 = 300,000 300,000 2 = 600,000 < > 150,000 4 5 = 3,000,000 : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 100,000 5 = 500,000 500,000 2 = 1,000,000-100,000 10 = 1,000,000 7. < > 100,000 5 4 = 2,000,000 : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 100,000 4 5= 2,000,000 16,900 8. <KICCE > 100,000 3 5 = 1,500,000 : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 100,000 5 4 = 2,000,000 < > 25,000 7 10 = 1,750,000 25,000 10 5 = 1,250,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 < > 25,000 8 5 = 1,000,000 9,000-227 -

25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 9. <KICCE > 25,000 8 10 = 2,000,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 < > ( ) - ( ) 10,000,000 1(1) = 10,000,000 - () 80,000 1,600 = 128,000,000 ( 2,700 ) - ( ) 3,400,000 1 = 3,400,000 < > ( ) 1,000,000 1 = 1,000,000 <KICCE > - 50,000 25 6 6 = 45,000,000 187,400 ( ) () ( ) () ( ) 1( ) ( ) (A-1) (A-1) ( ) (A-2) - 228 -

() (A-3),,,, (,,, ). - 229 -

(5)-1..,. 2013,. (, 2016).,,.,. 2017 5, 5. KICCE., 2017 5.,., - 230 -

,.,,.,.,,. ( ),,.,,.. -,, -,. -: -(): (2016) -: - - - (1,202), - - - 231 -

, -. -: -(): (2016) -: -: (1991, 1996, 2001) -(): (1991, 1996, 2001) -:,. - - 62 6-27,000 -: - - Simulation -(): (2011) -: 2005 (rotation sample). -: Survey of Income and Program Participation(SIPP) -(): (Census Bureau)(2004, 2008, 2014) -:,,. - 4 -, - - - - - - - - - - -(Rotation model) -(Rotation Sampling) - -. -,,,. -. -, - - ( ) - - - - - - - - - - 232 -

A-1.,. A-1.. - A-1.. -,,.,. -,. -,. A-1.. - 1 2-3 ( ) 4 5 6-7 8 9-10 11 12,, - 233 -

, A-1.,. (Rotation). - (:6). -,. -,,. 1,600( 2,400 ), -., A-1., -,. - 234 -

,.,,, ( ),,.. 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-235 -

I. I6. () (Consumption (Rotation Panel (Demand for (Childcare Cost) Survey) Survey) ECEC services) 3 1 3 2 3 2 3 5 42 48 49 71 () 200,000 1. 70,000 1 14 5 = 4,900,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 7 = 17,500,000 22,400 2. 1,300-236 -

3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 3,000 100 = 300,000 10,000 5 10 = 500,000 5,000 10 10 = 500,000 (8,180+101 95) 200 1.1 = 3,911,000 29,736 10 = 297,360 50 1000apge 5 = 250,000 (SAS) 6,000,000 1 = 6,000,000 ( ) 550,000 1 = 550,000 PC 70,000 1 7 = 490,000 70,000 1 3 = 210,000-100,000 3 5 = 1,500,000-20,000 3 5 = 300,000 (, 56) - - 3,108,350 2() = 6,216,700 - ( 2, 2 ) - ($30*6 + $137*5 + $59*6) 1,130 2 = 2,754,940 ( ) 100,000 2 = 200,000 50,000 4 2 = 400,000 6,000 2 5 7 = 420,000 300,000 2 = 600,000 150,000 4 5 = 3,000,000 : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 100,000 5 = 500,000 500,000 2 = 1,000,000-100,000 10 = 1,000,000 25,000 7 10 = 1,750,000 4,458 7,250 10,772 1,620 6,800 4,000-237 -

9. 25,000 10 5 = 1,250,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 ( ) - ( ) 10,000,000 1(1) = 10,000,000 - () 80,000 1,600 = 128,000,000 ( 2,700 ) - ( ) 3,400,000 1 = 3,400,000 ( ) 141,400 ( ) ( ) - 238 -

(5)-2. 2012 0-2 5, 2013 3,4 0-5. 2012, 2 15 2, 2011 2 20 2 5 (, 2016). 2012, 2013,, (, 2016). 2016 1 16 9,, 0 8 4, 1 4 5, 2 11 5, 3 23 6 4 25 4, 5 27 5 (, 2016)..,.,. 2018 2022 5, - 239 -

.,., (, ).,,..,,. -: (V) -(): (2016) -: -: -2 : (2012, 2013 -: 1,312( 1,820) (: ) - 16 9., - 6 5, 19 4( 23 6, 4 8 ) - 11 8. -, 563. 0-240 -

-: 2015 - -(): (2016) -:. -: : 2004-2014 -(): (2014) -: 2004 10,,,. -: -(): (2015) -: 0-5 - 2018 2022 - - -: 2,593( 3,650) -:,,,, - : 2004, 2009, 2012,, -: 250, 1000,. - - : - - - - : - - - 234, 5.4%. - 1 195, 6 4,114. - 45.6%, 21.4%. - 96,400 2.7% - 35.2%, 23.5%. - : 1 2004 157,600, 2009 189,500, 2012 208,700 ( ) - - ( ) - : 2014 2024 2.3% - :. - :,.,, 5. -, -, - - 241 -

- -,,, 5. 5 A..,,. -,,,. -,. -,. - 1 (2018) -,,,,, - 242 -

,. -,,, (,,,, ), ( ), (, ). -,,,,. -. 2 (2019) 1 2019., 3 (2020),,. 4 (2021) - 243 -

5 (2022), 4 OECD (A-1 ),.,., 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-244 -

I I6 () (Infant Education and Child-care Service Cost) (Demand for Infant-care) - 245 -

3 2 3 4 3 5 2 1 49 65 71 18, () 20,000 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 70,000 1 5 4 = 1,400,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 1 = 2,500,000 2,000 100 = 200,000-5,000 10 = 50,000 (8,180+101 95) 200 1.1 = 3,911,000 15,900 10 = 159,000 ( ) 500,000 2 = 1,000,000-100,000 2 1 = 200,000 - ( ) 100,000 2 3 = 600,000-20,000 3 5 = 300,000 ( ) 50,000 2 = 100,000 50,000 2 2 = 200,000 300,000 2 = 600,000 6,000 4 5 4 = 480,000 100,000 5 4 = 2,000,000 3,900 250 4,070 1,000 1,100 1,380 5,300-246 -

8. 9. : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 100,000 4 5= 2,000,000 25,000 8 5 = 1,000,000 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 ( ) 1,000,000 1 = 1,000,000 2,000 1,000 1. ( ) - 247 -

(5)-3. KICCE 2017 3 2.2%, 9.8%, 3.1%, 2.8%. 2016 107 2 31.0%, 90% (, 2016). 2012,. 2012 (,, ),.., 1, 2..,. - 248 -

. -: - - -(): - (2012) -:,. -: KICCE -(): (2013) -:, 3 -: KICCE (II) -(): (2014) -: 2,. -: KICCE (Ⅲ) -(): (2015) -:,,. - - 2 - - (1997~2013 ) - 2-1, 2-1 - - (1997~2014 ) - 3-1, 2, 3 - - - -. -,.. -. -2014 - -2013-2014 -, -,, -: KICCE - -2016 2-249 -

(Ⅳ) - -(): - (2016) - -: - - -/., 2016 KICCE. 2013-2016 () 3 - - - - - - - - - - -/. --2013-2018 ( ) - - (2018-2022) 2013 KICCE., (2018-2022) 1 (2018) - 250 -

, (1) 6 2 (2019) 2013 3 (2020) 4 (2021) VAR(Vector AutoRegression) / 5 (2022) 2013-2022 2013-2017 2018 2018 (,,,, ) - 251 -

/ 6 2018.,, 2 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-252 -

I I6 () (Childrearing Price Index) (Parents Perception of Childrearing Costs) (,, ), 3 2 2 1 2 80,000 () 48 18, 26 13,150 900 4,760-253 -

PC 70,000 1 3 = 210,000 70,000 1 4 = 280,000 ( ) 300,000 1 = 300,000 - ( ) 100,000 3 2 = 600,000 5. - 20,000 3 5 = 300,000 100,000 2 3 = 600,000 100,000 2 1 = 200,000 ( ) 100,000 5 1 = 500,000 6. 6,000 5 10 = 300,000 100,000 3 5 = 1,500,000 7. : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 25,000 8 10 = 2,000,000 8. 25,000 4 10 = 1,000,000 9. - 50,000 25 6 6 = 45,000,000 5,290 1,500 1,600 4,800 3,000 45,000 ( ) () () ( ) - 254 -

(),,,, (,,, ). - 255 -

(6),, - 256 -

(2014). -:,, - - - (2015). - - - -:, (2016). - - - -: - -,, -, - - - - -,,, - - - 257 -

- - - - - -. -, - -, (,,,,,,,, ), - -,,, (customized), (visiting) 1:, 2:,, 3:, 4:, - 258 -

30,, ( 1 ) ( ) 20 40 ( 2 ) 30 10 20 ( ) 30/ 60/,, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-259 -

I I6 () (parent education) (parenting) (family diversity) (dual-earner couples) (customized home visiting service) - 260 -

() 60,000 70,000 1 13 5 = 4,550,000 70,000 1 14 9 = 8,820,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 1 = 2,500,000 2,000 200 = 400,000 20,000 36 = 720,000 10,000 10 = 100,000 (8,180+101 95) 200 1.1 = 3,910,500 50 300page 10 = 150,000 118,750 10 = 1,187,500 PC 70,000 1 5 = 350,000 70,000 1 9 = 630,000 70,000 1 1 = 70,000 - ( ) 100,000 3 10 = 3,000,000-20,000 3 18 = 1,080,000 50,000 10 = 500,000 15,870 1,220 5,248 1,050 4,080 2,232-261 -

50,000 2 4 = 400,000 6,000 3 8 3 = 432,000 300,000 3 = 900,000 100,000 4 10 = 4,000,000 200,000 2 = 400,000 300,000 3 = 900,000 IRB 200,000 1 = 200,000 (1 ) 70,000 40 = 2,800,000 (2 ) 70,000 20 = 1,400,000 25,000 8 5 = 1,000,000 10,000 100 1 = 1,000,000 6 = 600,000 300,000 2 30 = 18,000,000 9,700 2,600 18,000 ( ) () () ( ) - 262 -

(7) : KICCE 2011 5 2012, 2013 3~4 3~5. 2012 5 (, 2012). 2013 3~5 3~5 (, 2013). 2013, 2014 (, 2013;, 2014). 2013,,. 2014 5,.,,. 5 (, 2014). - 263 -

., (; ),. 3~5,. 3~5. 2017 2013 3~5. 3-5,,. 2017 3-5, 2018,,. - 264 -

-: 5 -(): (2014) - 5 -: 5 : -(): (2012) - 5 -: 3~4 -(): (2013) - 3~5 3~4 -: 5 -(): (2013) -, -: 3-5 -(): (2014) - - -5-5 - - - - - - - - - - - -(/) - - - - -5-5 -5-5 -5-5 -5-3~4-3~4-3~4-3~4-5 -5 - -3-5 3~5 5-265 -

- 3-5 3, 4, 5. - 3~5 3-5,,,. 3,4,5 -,,, -3-5 - -,, -5 -,, - 3~5 3~5-3~5-3~5-3~5-3~5 (1) 2018 3~5 3~5 (1) - 2(, ) - 5,, -,,,, 5-5 (1) - 266 -

- 3~5 (2019) 3~5, (, ), 2020 (2020 ~),, - 3~5, 3~5 3~5 3~5, 3~5 3~5 3~5 3~5-267 -

3~5 3~5 3~5 -,, 3~5 (2019) 3~5 3~5,, 년도 2018년 2019년 2020년 2021년 2022년 예산 1억 3억 1억5천 1억5천 1억5천 3~5 전산자료관리및분석 2018 3~5 3~5,,,. - 268 -

5 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I. M. I6 M2 (early ( Nuri () (child care) childhood (observation) web-based Curriculum ) education) - 269 -

() 100,000 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 7,000 1 18 10 = 12,600,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 8 = 20,000,000 3,000 200 = 600,000 10,000 1 40 = 400,000 (8,180+101 95) 1.1 150 = 2,933,000 65,700 10 = 657,000 5,000,000 1 = 5,000,000 5,000,000 1 = 5,000,000 10,000,000 1 = 10,000,000 300,000 2 = 600,000 100,000 3 2 = 600,000-100,000 3 4 = 1,200,000-32,600 1,000 3,590 20,600 2,400-270 -

20,000 3 10 = 600,000 100,000 6 = 600,000 50,000 3 3 = 450,000 6. 300,000 2 = 600,000 6,000 3 5 4 = 360,000-100,000 10 7 = 7,000,000 IRB - 200,000 2 1 = 400,000 7. - 1,000,000 6 = 6,000,000-100,000 10 2 = 2,000,000() - 80,000 10 2 = 1,600,000(), 25,000 30 12 = 9,000,000 8. 25,000 5 4 = 500,000 9. 10,000,000 1 = 10,000,000 2,010 18,300 9,500 10,000 ( ) - 271 -

- 272 -

(1) UN 2030 15 (Sustainable Development Goals: SDGs). SDGs 15 (Millenium Development Goals: MDGs),,, (, 2016). SDGs 2016 2020 5 2 (, 2015 11). 2 SDGs., 24, (Country Partnership Strategies: CPS) (, 2016).,. SDGs (SDG 4) (target 4.2).. - 275 -

,.,. (ECCE). UN (lowest-income level country),. UNESCO,, 6, 11 15 ECCE Teacher Competency Framework. 2,, 3.,.,,,.., ROSA EAPRO, ARNEC (Asia Regional Network of Early Childhood), KDI, (2013. 9), 31 22 220. - 276 -

2 (2016 7, ) 37 SDG Target 4.2.,,. 1), 2) (), 3). SDG 4.2. 3, 1 : 2 : 3 : -: -(): (2007, 2008, 2009) -: 3 -: (I): - -,, - -,,,, -, -, - 277 -

(): (2010) - SWAT -:. 3 (2010-2012) - -,, - - - - - (2) - - - - - - - 1 : ( ),,,,,,,,, - - - 278 -

EFA Global Monitoring Report - UNESCO, OECD, UNICEF, ARNEC, World Bank, -,, ( 3) - UNICEF, ARNEC, World Bank, Plan, -, KOICA(), EWB( ),,, (UNESCO Bangkok Asia-Pacific Regional Bureau for Education) ARNEC(Asia Regional Network of Early Childhood) MOU (2013. 8), 2013 ARNEC. - - - ARNEC, 1 (+ARNEC 1), 1 2 - (3 ) - - ( 1, 23): 3,, ARNEC - -, 2 pool - - 279 -

- ( ) - (Country background report) -, - ( ) - (ARNEC ) - ARNEC - 1 pool - () - -, - ( ) - ( ) ( ) - 3 - - - ( ) (ARNEC ) - ( ) - - ( ) 1) 2) - 60 ( 20) - 280 -

- 30 (, 10 ) - :,,,,, - : : -, KOICA, EWB,,,, -,,,,, / (2) :, ARNEC ( 1 ) - ():, - ():, : 3,, ARNEC : 15, 23 ( ) ( 1) : : 2018 10, :, : 3, ARNEC, (, - 281 -

, ), --- --- --- --- 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- I, M I. 16. M. 2. () (Development Assistance) (Asia-Pacific Region) (Early Childhood Education and Care) (Needs Assessment) (Action Plan) - 282 -

( SDG 4.2 ),, ( SDG 4.2 ),, (, ) (0~5) () ( ) 2,500,000 1 1 = 2,500,000 ( ) - 283 -

420,000 2 = 840,000-284 -

( ) ( ) - 285 -

- 286 -

(2) Ⅲ.,,,, (, 2016, 13).,. 2006 2017 2, 3 2017 10.,,,..,,., CARE.,,, - 287 -

(, 2016).,, (, 2016). (2016, 2017) CARE. CARE. CARE (Common Value), (Ability), (Resource), (Empowering) 4 (, 2016). 2016 2020 < 1>. - 288 -

3 2017 10 2., 1 2., (), (), ( ).. - 289 -

-: - - -(): (2016) - -:, 2015 (, 2015) - - - - 3 2017 10 2. - - -CARE 3 -CARE, - - - 290 -

1 (2016): 3 CARE consulting 90. 3. 2 (2017): 2016, 2017 10. - 2017. CARE consulting, 3 90. 3 (2018): CARE consulting,. 100 CARE consulting. CARE consulting. 3 2017 10-291 -

. CARE 3 2017 CARE 3. CARE. CARE. CARE 1 2. CARE 3. CARE, 2.. CARE 3., - 292 -

1 2,, 2016 2017,.,.,,. 2,.. 100 CARE. 100., - 293 -

. 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I () I 6( ) (child care center quality monitering ) (evaluation-based consulting) - 294 -

: : () 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 70,000 1 15 10 = 10,500,000 ( ) 2,500,000 1 12 =30,000,000 (2018) 6,500,000=6,500,000 2,000 200 = 400,000 20,000 30 = 600,000 (, ) (8,180+101 95) 1.1 200 = 3,911,000 242,900 10 = 2,429,000 ( ) 700,000 1 = 700,000 PC 70,000 1 10 = 700,000 70,000 1 12 = 840,000-100,000 4 5 = 2,000,000-20,000 5 10 = 1,000,000 100,000 5 6 = 3,000,000 100,000 2 = 200,000 50,000 3 2 = 300,000 47,000 1,000 6,340 2,240 6,000 1,220-295 -

7. 8. 9. 6,000 4 5 6 = 720,000 100,000 5 6 = 3,000,000 IRB 200,000 2 1 = 400,000 200,000 4 = 800,000 200,000 2 = 400,000 300,000 3 = 900,000-150,000 4 5 = 3,000,000-150,000 1 40 = 6,000,000 25,000 10 8 = 2,000,000 ( ) 25,000 15 8 = 3,000,000 25,000 4 12 = 1,200,000 () - 9,000,000 = 9,000,000 - () 1,000,000 1 =1,000,000 3-20,000,000 3 = 60,000,000 - ( 3) 1,500,000 3 =4,500,000 1,000,000 1 1 = 1,000,000 14,500 6,200 75,500 ( ) () () - 296 -

30,,, (3) - 297 -

- 298 -

(1) 2018 (Ⅱ). (Ⅱ) 2008 2,150, 1,685 20 2027.,,,, (),., 1,770 90%, 70%. OECD Start Strong Ⅲ,,. (Ⅱ). 1,093, 18, 129, 335., KDI,. - 301 -

2018 ( 4),., 3,,,. (:, )..,., 10-302 -

1~8, (2017 10 13 ). 1,093, 18, 335. 4 4, 143. KDI,,. 90%, 70%.. 1 5.54 7 1, 2 30., 47.6%, 35.3%. - 303 -

2006 2008 (). 0~ 3 7~9 11~12 13-15 16-18 19 2 ~6 (1~3) (4~6) ( 1~3) ( 1~3) ( 1) 2008 1 2009 2 1 2010 3 2011 4 2012 5 2013 6 2 2014 7 2015 8 2016 9 3 2017 10 2018 11 2019 12 2020 13 4 2021 14 2022 15 2023 16 2024 17 5 2025 18 2026 19 2027 20 6 2018 (Ⅱ) 11. 11 10, 2017 4. 2017, 12. 11. - 304 -

, TAPI PAPI TAPI - (,,,, ) - (,, ) - (,, ) - (,, ) - (,, ) - (, ) - (, ) - (,, ) - (,, ) - (, ) - (Big 5) CAWI - (, ) - (, ) - (, /, ) 10 1~10. 2017 10 3. 2008 2017 10. 9,. 9,.,.,,,. - 305 -

,.,. 11,, 11. 9,,.. 1. 2. 11 3. 9, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-306 -

, 9 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ⅰ Ⅰ6 () (panel study) (longitudinal (human (children) (child-rearing) study) development), - 307 -

() 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 70,000 1 13 5 = 4,550,000 ( ) 2,500,000 4 10 = 100,000,000 2,000 100 = 200,000 / 20,000 10 = 200,000 1,500 200 = 300,000 (, ) (8,180+101 95) 1.1 200 = 3,911,000-10,000 20 = 200,000-400page 25 200 = 2,000,000 -, (500 300) + (100,000 1)= 250,000-2,200,000 1 = 2,200,000 18,900 10 = 189,000 ( ) - 2,500,000 1 = 2,500,000-1,280,000 1 = 1,280,000-20,000 6 4 1 = 480,000 - (,,, ) 100,000 6 4 1 = 2,400,000-1,000,000 2 = 2,000,000-2,000,000 2 = 4,000,000 ( ) 100,000 4 1 = 400,000 ( ) 104,550 700 8,750 3,780 8,880 3,940-308 -

7. 8. 9. 2,000 1 1,770 = 3,540,000 150,000 4 5 = 3,000,000 / 100,000 9 1 = 900,000 -,, 150,000 20 1 = 3,000,000-1,300,000 2 = 2,600,000 : 200,000 2 = 400,000 : 300,000 3 = 900,000 400,000 1 5 = 2,000,000 200,000 2 = 400,000 25,000 10 5 = 1,250,000 (, ) 15,000 280 = 4,200,000 25,000 4 3 = 300,000 25,000 30 3 = 2,250,000 () - ( ) (TAPI 4) 280,000,000 1 = 280,000,000 - () 45,000,000 1 = 45,000,000-28,200,000 1 = 28,200,000 7,000,000 1 = 7,000,000 13,200 8,000 360,200 ( ) ( ) - 309 -

- 310 -

ㆍ EGGP01 EGGP02 ㆍ EGGP03 365... EGGP06 1. 2. DB 3. 4. MIS 5. 6. DB 7. (NAS, SAN) 8. 9. NAS (, ) 10. SAN (, MIS DB ) 11., DB 12. AD - 315 -

EGGP06 13. USB 14. 15. VMware - - 1. USB 2. 3. 4. NAC 5. 6. DDOS 7. ( ) 1. 1. (2005 ) 1 2. (2005, 2007) 2 EGGP10 EGGP12 (11/) 2018. 1. 1. 2018.12.31-316 -

() EGGP13 110,000-1,100,000 12=13,200,000 - V3 PC 80, PC 80, PMS 80, 3, 1, 80 12,000,000 1=12,000,000-2,400,000 1=2,400,000-5,000,000 2=10,000,000-300,000 12=3,600,000-700,000 12=8,400,000 - NAC 300,000 12=3,600,000 - USB 300,000 12=3,600,000-200,000 12=2,400,000-600,000 1=600,000-200,000 12=2,400,000 - NAS 500,000 12=6,000,000 - SAN 500,000 12=6,000,000-18 600,000 12=7,200,000 - PC 41,200 68,800-317 -

() EGGP13 300,000 12=3,600,000-300,000 1=3,600,000 - VMware 10,000,000 1=10,000,000 - (WAC) 11,400,000 1=11,400,000 ( ) ESP09-318 -

EGGP01 EGGP02 ㆍ, EGGP03. EGGP06 - - EGGP10-319 -

EGGP10 EGGP12 (3/) 2018. 1. 1. 2018.12.31 () EGGP13 50,000 () 4,000,000 1 = 4,000,000 3,700,000 5 = 18,500,000 250,000 1 = 250,000 250,000 1 = 250,000 31,000 19,000-320 -

- 322 -

(1) EFP02 EFP03 ( ),. 2017 : 2558 3, 4 : : 2017. 1 ~ EFP04 EFP05 EFP07 (12/) 2018. 1. 1 2018.12.31 () EFP08 702,000 702,000,000 = 702,000,000 702,000-323 -

() EFP08-324 -

(1) EEP01 EEP02,. 양식 EEP04 -, - -, - - 3-5 - ( ) - -, EEP05. () EEP06 565,768 565,768,000 = 565,768,000 565,768-327 -

EEP07 2006. 1. 26 1 1 () ( ). 2 (). 3 ()., 500. 2 4 ( ) ( ). 3 5 ( ),. 6 ( )1. 2. 7 ( )1 100%. 2,. 3 25%. - 328 -

EEP07 4,. 5.,. 6. 7 1 4. 8 ( ),. 9 ( ). 10 ( ). 11 (). 4 12 ( ). 13 ( )1,,,. 14 () 1. 15 (),. 16 ( ). - 329 -

7,952,768 7,952,768 6,770,000 3,315,000 1,182,768 3,531,768 404,000 702,000-337 -

- 338 -

- 341 -

- 342 -

- 343 -

7,952,768 7,952,768 6,770,000 3,315,000 6,770,000 1,960,946-624,038 1,182,768 250,379 1,161,000 479,637 - - 16,768-5,000 3,531,768-1,245,000-1,010,000 140,000 95,000 1,721,000 565,768 404,000 22,300 299,000 28,110 54,590 702,000-347 -

7,952,768 6,770,000 6,770,000 2,758,000 404,000 1,245,000 1,721,000 642,000 - - - 1,182,768 1,161,000 1,161,000 16,768 16,768 5,000 5,000 - - - 351 -

7,952,768 3,315,000 1,960,946 1,831,011 1,735,971 95,040 129,935 129,215 720 624,038 586,250 586,250 37,788 37,788 250,379 227,419 31,944 81,702 70,290 2,325 41,158 22,960 2,960 6,000 7,800-6,200 479,637-355 -

445,320 217,976 100,301 79,983 5,239 23,524 18,297 34,317 16,774 8,433 5,735 376 1,687 1,312 3,531,768 1,245,000 1,010,000 140,000 95,000 1,721,000 565,768-404,000 22,300 299,000 28,110 54,590 702,000 702,000-356 -

- 358 -

인건비 - 359 -

7,952,768 Ⅰ 3,315,000 1,960,946 1,831,011 1,735,971 1,735,971,420 = 95,040 </> 750,000 1 12 = 9,000 </> 950,000 1 12 = 11,400 </> 500,000 1 12 = 6,000 </> </> </> 129,935 129,215 720 <(,)> 450,000 3 12 = 16,200 400,000 1 12 = 4,800 350,000 11 12 = 46,200 30,000 4 12 = 1,440 129,215,000 = 129,215-361 -

<(,)> 30,000 2 12 = 720 624,038 586,250 586,250 <> 37,788 37,788 <> 586,250,000 = 586,250 37,787,940 = 250,379 227,419 31,944 31,944,000 = : 2 : 4, : 2(1) : 2, : 6, : 10 81,702 81,702,000 = : 300,000() : 200,000() : 100,000() 70,290 70,290,000 = : 130,000() - 362 -

2,325 2,325,000 = 41,158 41,158,000 = 22,960 2,960 2,960,000 = 2,960 : 4, : 2(1) : 2, : 6, : 10 6,000 6,000,000 = 6,000 : 100,000() 7,800 7,800,000 = : 130,000() 6,200 479,637 445,320 217,976 6,200,000 = 6,200 217,976,000-363 -

100,301 79,983 79,983 5,239 79,982,891 23,524 18,297 34,317 16,774 16,774,000 8,433 187,407,940 5,735 187,407,940 376 5,734,683 1,687 187,407,940-364 -

1,312 187,407,940-365 -

기본연구사업

Ⅱ 3,531,768 1,245,000 1,010,000 (1) () (Ⅰ) : 78,000 13,100 <> 5,600 <( )> 7500 < > 400 700 <> 200 < 100 < 2,933 5,150 600 < > 1,617 1,310 10,408 <> < 700 210 < ( )> 400-369 -

- ( ) 400-480 4,643 4,285 <> 600 < > 300 3,132 18,800 < > 400 1,000 < ( )> 400 <> 432 < 600 < 600 < 2,000 900 < 300-370 -

600 < > 400 900 < 3,000 400 600 1,600 < 5,000 2,500 < > 450 300 2,200 250 600 600 23,200 < > 19,200 (2) 60,000 18,150 4,000 <> 70,000 1 9 5 = 3,150 <( )> - 371 -

2,500,000 1 6 = 15,000 < > 2,000 100 = 200 340 </ > 20,000 7 = 140 <(, )> (8,180+101 95) 160p 1.1 = 3,128 5,952 < > 282,400 10 = 2,824 < 350 350 <> - 100,000 3 2 = 600 3,300-100,000 3 8 = 2,400-20,000 3 1 5 = 300 <( )> 50,000 4 = 200 < > 508 50,000 2 2 = 200 <> 6,000 3 3 2 = 108 < > 150,000 6 4 = 3,600 <IRB > 7,900 200,000 2 = 400 < > - 200,000 2 = 400-372 -